Search

Accurate diagnosis of upper extremity motor function in stroke patients is important for effective rehabilitation. However, the approach to correctly perform clinical assessments is still a matter of discussion and requires both trained personnel and specialized materials, thus, limiting the availability of stroke upper extremity diagnosis. Computer-aided methods have been scarcely reported for stroke upper extremity motor function estimation and could support personnel training and clinical decision-making. For these reasons, in the present study, linear regression and regression tree ensembles were applied to estimate upper extremity assessments’ scores using neurophysiological measurements, including electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A database was used to evaluate these approaches and was comprised by measurements of upper extremity sensorimotor and functional performance of stroke patients assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Regression tree ensembles outperformed linear models, estimating 66.7% of the FMA-UE scores and 70% of the ARAT scores with errors below the minimal clinically important difference. The median absolute errors were 3.5 points for the FMA-UE and 1.8 points for the ARAT, within clinically acceptable ranges. Variables that were associated with a higher upper extremity function measured with FMA-UE and ARAT were a higher corticospinal integrity in patients’ affected hemisphere, lower interhemispheric functional connectivity in the central region of the cortex during hand motor intention and, higher alpha activation in the central and lower activation in the parietal regions of the cortex during hand motor intention. Limitations of the study considered, the performance of the proposed approach implied that computer-aided estimation of upper extremity motor function is feasible using physiological information and nonlinear models. These models could be used to create expert systems that support clinical personnel training and decision making regarding upper extremity assessment in stroke.

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) offer the potential to facilitate neurorehabilitation in stroke patients by decoding user intentions from the central nervous system, thereby enabling control over external devices. Despite their promise, the diverse range of intervention parameters and technical challenges in clinical settings have hindered the accumulation of substantial evidence supporting the efficacy and effectiveness of BCIs in stroke rehabilitation. This article introduces a practical guide designed to navigate through these challenges in conducting BCI interventions for stroke rehabilitation. Applicable regardless of infrastructure and study design limitations, this guide acts as a comprehensive reference for executing BCI-based stroke interventions. Furthermore, it encapsulates insights gleaned from administering hundreds of BCI rehabilitation sessions to stroke patients. • Presents a comprehensive methodology for implementing BCI-based upper extremity therapy in stroke patients. • Provides detailed guidance on the number of sessions, trials, as well as the necessary hardware and software for effective intervention.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) serves as a crucial tool in evaluating motor cortex excitability by applying short magnetic pulses to the skull, inducing neuron depolarization in the cerebral cortex through electromagnetic induction. This technique leads to the activation of specific skeletal muscles recorded as Motor-Evoked Potentials (MEPs) through electromyography. Although various methodologies assess cortical excitability with TMS, measuring MEP amplitudes offers a straightforward approach, especially when comparing excitability states pre- and post-interventions designed to alter cortical excitability. Despite TMS's widespread use, the absence of a standardized procedure for such measurements in existing literature hinders the comparison of results across different studies. This paper proposes a standardized procedure for assessing changes in motor cortical excitability using single-pulse TMS pre- and post-intervention. The recommended approach utilizes an intensity equating to half of the MEP's maximum amplitude, thereby ensuring equal likelihood of amplitude increase or decrease, providing a consistent basis for future studies and facilitating meaningful comparisons of results. • A method for assessing changes in motor cortical excitability using single-pulse TMS before and after a specified intervention. • We recommend using an intensity equal to half of the MEP's maximum amplitude during evaluations to objectively assess motor cortical excitability changes post-intervention.

This work presents the design, implementation, and feasibility evaluation of a Motor Imagery (MI) based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) developed to control a Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) device. The aim of this system is to assist the upper limb motor recovery of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). With this BCI-controlled FES system, the user performs open and close MI with either the left or right hand, which if detected is used to provide visual feedback and electroestimulation to muscles in the forearm to perform the corresponding grasping movement. The system was evaluated with seven healthy subjects (HS group) and two SCI patients (SC group) in several experimental sessions across different days. Each experimental session consisted of a training routine devoted to collect calibration EEG data to train the BCI machine learning model, and of a validation routine devoted to validate system in online operation. The online system validation showed an accuracy of the recognition of the MI task that ranged between 78% and 81% for HS participants and between 63% and 93% for SCI participants. Additionally, the time taken by the BCI system to trigger the FES device ranged between 7.05 and 7.29 s for HS participants and between 8.43 s and 13.91 s for SCI participants. Finally, significant negative correlations were observed ( $r=-0.418$ , $p=0.024$ and $r=-0.437$ , $p=0.018$ for left and right hand MI conditions, respectively) between the online BCI performance with a quantitative EEG parameter based on event-related desynchronization/synchronization analysis. The results of this work indicate the feasibility of the proposed BCI coupled to a FES device to be used for SCI patients with a moderate level of disability and provides evidence of the functionality of the proposed BCI system in a motor rehabilitation context.

IntroductionBrain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) can allow control of external devices using motor imagery (MI) decoded from electroencephalography (EEG). Although BCI have a wide range of applications including neurorehabilitation, the low spatial resolution of EEG, coupled to the variability of cortical activations during MI, make control of BCI based on EEG a challenging task.MethodsAn assessment of BCI control with different feedback timing strategies was performed. Two different feedback timing strategies were compared, comprised by passive hand movement provided by a robotic hand orthosis. One of the timing strategies, the continuous, involved the partial movement of the robot immediately after the recognition of each time segment in which hand MI was performed. The other feedback, the discrete, was comprised by the entire movement of the robot after the processing of the complete MI period. Eighteen healthy participants performed two sessions of BCI training and testing, one with each feedback.ResultsSignificantly higher BCI performance (65.4 ± 17.9% with the continuous and 62.1 ± 18.6% with the discrete feedback) and pronounced bilateral alpha and ipsilateral beta cortical activations were observed with the continuous feedback.DiscussionIt was hypothesized that these effects, although heterogenous across participants, were caused by the enhancement of attentional and closed-loop somatosensory processes. This is important, since a continuous feedback timing could increase the number of BCI users that can control a MI-based system or enhance cortical activations associated with neuroplasticity, important for neurorehabilitation applications.

COVID-19 may increase the risk of acute ischemic stroke that can cause a loss of upper limb function, even in patients with low risk factors. However, only individual cases have been reported assessing different degrees of hospitalization outcomes. Therefore, outpatient recovery profiles during rehabilitation interventions are needed to better understand neuroplasticity mechanisms required for upper limb motor recovery. Here, we report the progression of physiological and clinical outcomes during upper limb rehabilitation of a 41-year-old patient, without any stroke risk factors, which presented a stroke on the same day as being diagnosed with COVID-19. The patient, who presented hemiparesis with incomplete motor recovery after conventional treatment, participated in a clinical trial consisting of an experimental brain-computer interface (BCI) therapy focused on upper limb rehabilitation during the chronic stage of stroke. Clinical and physiological features were measured throughout the intervention, including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), corticospinal excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation, cortical activity with electroencephalography, and upper limb strength. After the intervention, the patient gained 8 points and 24 points of FMA-UE and ARAT, respectively, along with a reduction of one point of MAS. In addition, grip and pinch strength doubled. Corticospinal excitability of the affected hemisphere increased while it decreased in the unaffected hemisphere. Moreover, cortical activity became more pronounced in the affected hemisphere during movement intention of the paralyzed hand. Recovery was higher compared to that reported in other BCI interventions in stroke and was due to a reengagement of the primary motor cortex of the affected hemisphere during hand motor control. This suggests that patients with stroke related to COVID-19 may benefit from a BCI intervention and highlights the possibility of a significant recovery in these patients, even in the chronic stage of stroke.

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) coupled to robotic assistive devices have shown promise for the rehabilitation of stroke patients. However, little has been reported that compares the clinical and physiological effects of a BCI intervention for upper limb stroke rehabilitation with those of conventional therapy. This study assesses the feasibility of an intervention with a BCI based on electroencephalography (EEG) coupled to a robotic hand orthosis for upper limb stroke rehabilitation and compares its outcomes to conventional therapy. Seven subacute and three chronic stroke patients (M = 59.9 ± 12.8) with severe upper limb impairment were recruited in a crossover feasibility study to receive 1 month of BCI therapy and 1 month of conventional therapy in random order. The outcome measures were comprised of: Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), hand dynamometry, and EEG. Additionally, BCI performance and user experience were measured. All measurements were acquired before and after each intervention. FMA-UE and ARAT after BCI (23.1 ± 16; 8.4 ± 10) and after conventional therapy (21.9 ± 15; 8.7 ± 11) were significantly higher (p < 0.017) compared to baseline (17.5 ± 15; 4.3 ± 6) but were similar between therapies (p > 0.017). Via TMS, corticospinal tract integrity could be assessed in the affected hemisphere of three patients at baseline, in five after BCI, and four after conventional therapy. While no significant difference (p > 0.05) was found in patients’ affected hand strength, it was higher after the BCI therapy. EEG cortical activations were significantly higher over motor and non-motor regions after both therapies (p < 0.017). System performance increased across BCI sessions, from 54 (50, 70%) to 72% (56, 83%). Patients reported moderate mental workloads and excellent usability with the BCI. Outcome measurements implied that a BCI intervention using a robotic hand orthosis as feedback has the potential to elicit neuroplasticity-related mechanisms, similar to those observed during conventional therapy, even in a group of severely impaired stroke patients. Therefore, the proposed BCI system could be a suitable therapy option and will be further assessed in clinical trials.

Stroke is a leading cause of motor disability worldwide. Upper limb rehabilitation is particularly challenging since approximately 35% of patients recover significant hand function after 6 months of the stroke’s onset. Therefore, new therapies, especially those based on brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and robotic assistive devices, are currently under research. Electroencephalography (EEG) acquired brain rhythms in alpha and beta bands, during motor tasks, such as motor imagery/intention (MI), could provide insight of motor-related neural plasticity occurring during a BCI intervention. Hence, a longitudinal analysis of subacute stroke patients’ brain rhythms during a BCI coupled to robotic device intervention was performed in this study. Data of 9 stroke patients were acquired across 12 sessions of the BCI intervention. Alpha and beta event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) trends across sessions and their association with time since stroke onset and clinical upper extremity recovery were analyzed, using correlation and linear stepwise regression, respectively. More EEG channels presented significant ERD/ERS trends across sessions related with time since stroke onset, in beta, compared to alpha. Linear models implied a moderate relationship between alpha rhythms in frontal, temporal, and parietal areas with upper limb motor recovery and suggested a strong association between beta activity in frontal, central, and parietal regions with upper limb motor recovery. Higher association of beta with both time since stroke onset and upper limb motor recovery could be explained by beta relation with closed-loop communication between the sensorimotor cortex and the paralyzed upper limb, and alpha being probably more associated with motor learning mechanisms. The association between upper limb motor recovery and beta activations reinforces the hypothesis that broader regions of the cortex activate during movement tasks as a compensatory mechanism in stroke patients with severe motor impairment. Therefore, EEG across BCI interventions could provide valuable information for prognosis and BCI cortical activity targets.

Patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus must monitor their blood glucose levels in order to control the glycaemia. Consequently, they must perform a capillary test at least three times per day and, besides that, a laboratory test once or twice per month. These standard methods pose difficulty for patients since they need to prick their finger in order to determine the glucose concentration, yielding discomfort and distress. In this paper, an Internet of Things (IoT)-based framework for non-invasive blood glucose monitoring is described. The system is based on Raspberry Pi Zero (RPi) energised with a power bank, using a visible laser beam and a Raspberry Pi Camera, all implemented in a glove. Data for the non-invasive monitoring is acquired by the RPi Zero taking a set of pictures of the user fingertip and computing their histograms. Generated data is processed by an artificial neural network (ANN) implemented on a Flask microservice using the Tensorflow libraries. In this paper, all measurements were performed in vivo and the obtained data was validated against laboratory blood tests by means of the mean absolute error (10.37%) and Clarke grid error (90.32% in zone A). Estimated glucose values can be harvested by an end device such as a smartphone for monitoring purposes.