Search

Abstract Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation can improve the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma. However, the precise role of tandem transplantation remains debatable. We evaluated the clinical benefits of tandem transplantation retrospectively. Of the 655 included patients, 117 underwent tandem transplantation; the remaining were assigned to the control group. After a single transplantation, the tandem group achieved a complete remission (CR) rate of 24.8%, which increased to 46.2% after a second transplantation. The tandem group had a significantly longer median PFS than the control group in patients with International Staging System (ISS) III and high-risk cytogenetics (23.1 vs. 14.7 months, p = 0.007 for ISS III; 21.7 vs. 13.2 months, p = 0.042 for high-risk cytogenetics). The tandem group exhibited significantly superior PFS to the control group (20.3 vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.003) among patients who failed to achieve CR after a single transplantation. Tandem transplantation was associated with significantly improved PFS after adjusting for maintenance therapy in patients with ISS III, those with high-risk cytogenetics, and those who did not achieve CR after a single transplantation. Following propensity score matching, the tandem group exhibited significantly longer PFS than the control group (30.3 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.028). Tandem transplantation should be considered in high-risk patients.

Here, we present the outcomes of four patients with COVID-19 who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at the National Cancer Center in South Korea. Despite concerns about the unfavorable course of COVID-19 in HSCT recipients, none of our patients experienced severe COVID-19. Moreover, extended viral shedding in case 1, lasting over 100 days, was resolved after successful engraftment. Contracting the virus when the host could not mount enough of an immune reaction might result in a paradoxically favorable course. Vaccination, monoclonal antibodies, and antiviral agent usage against COVID-19 might also be effective. We suggest, if necessary, HSCT should not be deferred in COVID-19 patients.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) combination therapy improves the survival of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Nonetheless, evidence on the use of KRd in Asian populations remains scarce. Accordingly, this study aimed at investigating this regimen’s efficacy in a large group of patients. This retrospective study included patients with RRMM who were treated with KRd at 21 centers between February 2018 and October 2020. Overall, 364 patients were included (median age: 63 years). The overall response rate was 90% in responseevaluable patients, including 69% who achieved a very good partial response or deeper responses. With a median follow-up duration of 34.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.4 months and overall survival (OS) was 59.5 months. Among adverse factors affecting PFS, highrisk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, and doubling of monoclonal protein within 2 to 3 months prior to start of KRd treatment significantly decreased PFS and overall survival (OS) in multivariate analyses. Patients who underwent post-KRd stem cell transplantation (i.e.delayed transplant) showed prolonged PFS and OS. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 56% of the patients, and non-fatal or fatal AE’s that resulted in discontinuation of KRd were reported in 7% and 2% of patients, respectively. Cardiovascular toxicity was comparable to that reported in the ASPIRE study. In summary, KRd was effective in a large real-world cohort of patients with RRMM with long-term follow-up. These findings may further inform treatment choices in the treatment of patients with RRMM.

Abstract The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) has not been assessed in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL, the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma). This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic value of CAR in 186 DLBCL patients. A CAR value of 0.158 was selected as the most discriminative cut-off for identifying patients with high CAR values (73/141 patients, 51.8%). During a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the high CAR group had significantly poorer complete response to induction therapy (64.4% vs. 92.6%; p 0.158 also showed worse 3-year OS (47.9% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.0035) and 3-year PFS (36.1% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.0011). A high CAR remained significantly associated with poor outcomes for > 60-year-old patients (OS: p = 0.0038, PFS: p = 0.0015) and younger patients (OS: p = 0.0041, PFS: p = 0.0044). Among older patients, a high CAR value also predicted non-relapse mortality (p = 0.035). Therefore, the CAR might complement the International Prognostic Index in DLBCL cases.