Search

Introduction: EGFR-mutant NSCLC is associated with low mutation burden and low levels of PD-L1 expression. We conducted a phase 2 trial to determine the efficacy of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR-mutant NSCLC after progression with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Methods: Participants were treated with induction durvalumab, tremelimumab, and platinum-pemetrexed, followed by durvalumab-pemetrexed maintenance. Participants were divided into two cohorts: (1) EGFR exon 20 T790M negative (T790M−, progressing on either first-line osimertinib, or on a single line of first/second generation TKI), and (2) T790M positive (T790M+, progressing on greater than or equal to 1 lines of TKI, including osimertinib). The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigators. Progression-free survival and safety were secondary outcomes. Results: One hundred participants from Australia and Taiwan were enrolled. Median follow-up was 26 months with 88% and 96% experiencing progression events for T790M− and T790M+, respectively. The ORR for T790M− was 31% (95% confidence interval: 20–45), including two complete responses. The ORR for T790M+ was 21% (95% confidence interval: 12–34). Median durations of response were 9.5 months and 6.3 months for T790M− and T790M+, respectively; median progression-free survival rates were 6.5 months and 4.9 months, respectively. For T790M−, ORR was 27% for 50% or higher PD-L1 (n = 22) and 0% for less than 50% PD-L1 (n = 10), respectively. For T790M+, ORR was 17% for 50% or higher PD-L1 (n = 24). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Conclusions: Durvalumab, tremelimumab, and platinum-pemetrexed had modest anti-tumor activity in EGFR-mutant NSCLC after progression on TKI. The T790M− cohort had higher ORR and a longer duration of response. Immune adverse events were not increased with tremelimumab. The clinical registration number of this trial is NCT03994393. more...

Abstract This single-arm phase II non-randomised trial (ACTRN12619001265167) evaluated trastuzumab emtansine in solid cancers with HER2 amplification or mutation detected by comprehensive genomic profiling. The primary objective was objective response (OR), while secondary objectives included the time to progression (TTP) on study to TTP on prior therapy ratio, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The cohort included 16 tumours with HER2 mutations (group 1) and 16 with HER2 amplification (group 2). After 17 months median follow-up, ORs occurred in 19% of group 1 (1 salivary gland carcinoma (SGC), 2 lung cancers) and 25% of group 2 (3 SGCs, 1 uterine carcinoma). Fourteen of 29 TTP-evaluable patients achieved a TTP ratio ≥1.3, including 10 without an OR. Median PFS and OS were 4.5 (95% CI 2.1–7.0) and 18.2 months (95% CI 8.1-not reached) respectively. Trastuzumab emtansine showed modest ORs and a favourable change in disease trajectory in select HER2-altered solid cancers. more...

Introduction: ALK-positive lung cancers represent a molecularly diverse disease. With drug exposure, driving selection pressure, and resistance pathways, disease relapse will emerge. There is compelling rationale to investigate novel treatment strategies, informed by dynamic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring. Methods: The single-arm, pilot study ALKTERNATE investigated fixed alternating cycles of lorlatinib intercalated with crizotinib in individuals resistant to second-generation ALK inhibitors. Dynamic ctDNA explored the correlation with disease response and disease recurrence and defined disease resistance. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure, a composite of tolerability, feasibility, and efficacy. Secondary outcomes included standard survival measures, toxicity, pharmacokinetic analysis, and patient-reported outcomes. Tertiary outcomes were proteogenomic analyses of tissue and plasma. Results: A total of 15 individuals were enrolled; three encountered primary resistance to lorlatinib induction. There were 12 participants who received alternating therapy, and this approach revealed safety, feasibility, and effectiveness. Patient-reported outcomes were maintained or improved on therapy, and toxicity was consistent with previous reports. The pharmacokinetic measures were similar to the single-arm drug experience. Median time-to-treatment failure was 10 months; overall survival was 23 months. ctDNA profiles indicated inferior survival in those with preexistent TP53 mutations and those without clear or cleared ctDNA at trial induction. The study defined a vastly heterogeneous population with an abundance of ALK coexisting with non-ALK resistance variants. Conclusions: ALKTERNATE revealed feasibility with a novel alternating ALK inhibitor strategy in ALK-positive NSCLC. Results support progressing inquiry into this approach and propose a flexible design with drug(s) selected and alternating time frames, informed by real-time plasma profiling. Moving this concept to treatment naive may also optimize impact. more...

Abstract In this phase II, single arm trial (ACTRN12617000720314), we investigate if alternating osimertinib and gefitinib would delay the development of resistance to osimertinib in advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation (n = 47) by modulating selective pressure on resistant clones. The primary endpoint is progression free-survival (PFS) rate at 12 months, and secondary endpoints include: feasibility of alternating therapy, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. The 12-month PFS rate is 38% (95% CI 27.5–55), not meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis reveals decrease and clearance of the original activating EGFR and EGFR-T790M mutations which are prognostic of clinical outcomes. In 73% of participants, loss of T790M ctDNA is observed at progression and no participants have evidence of the EGFR C797S resistance mutation following the alternating regimen. These findings highlight the challenges of treatment strategies designed to modulate clonal evolution and the clinical importance of resistance mechanisms beyond suppression of selected genetic mutations in driving therapeutic escape to highly potent targeted therapies. more...

IntroductionBrain metastases commonly occur in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Standard first-line treatment for NSCLC, without an EGFR, ALK or ROS1 mutation, is either chemoimmunotherapy or anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Traditionally, patients with symptomatic or untreated brain metastases were excluded from the pivotal clinical trials that established first-line treatment recommendations. The intracranial effectiveness of these treatment protocols has only recently been elucidated in small-scale prospective trials.MethodsPatients with NSCLC and brain metastases, treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy or anti-PD-1 monotherapy were selected from the Australian Registry and biObank of thoracic cancers (AURORA) clinical database covering seven institutions. The primary outcome was a composite time-to-event (TTE) outcome, including extracranial and intracranial progression, death, or need for local intracranial therapy, which served as a surrogate for disease progression. The secondary outcome included overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and objective response rate (ORR).Results116 patients were included. 63% received combination chemoimmunotherapy and 37% received anti-PD-1 monotherapy. 69% of patients received upfront local therapy either with surgery, radiotherapy or both. The median TTE was 7.1 months (95% CI 5 - 9) with extracranial progression being the most common progression event. Neither type of systemic therapy or upfront local therapy were predictive of TTE in a multivariate analysis. The median OS was 17 months (95% CI 13-27). Treatment with chemoimmunotherapy was predictive of longer OS in multivariate analysis (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.14 – 0.86; p=0.01). The iORR was 46.6%. The iORR was higher in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy compared to immunotherapy (58% versus 31%, p=0.01). The use of chemoimmunotherapy being predictive of iORR in a multivariate analysis (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.68 - 9.98; p=0.04).ConclusionThe results of this study of real-world data demonstrate the promising intracranial efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in the first-line setting, potentially surpassing that of immunotherapy alone. No demonstrable difference in survival or TTE was seen between receipt of upfront local therapy. Prospective studies are required to assist clinical decision making regarding optimal sequencing of local and systemic therapies. more...