Search

Background: Multiple treatment options for locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder (LPDS) have been described, including the modified McLaughlin procedure. The purpose of this review, therefore, was to perform a systematic review of the literature to synthesize the available data reporting on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing the modified McLaughlin procedure for the treatment of LPDS. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through January 2023 was performed. Outcomes studies reporting on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing the modified McLaughlin procedure for LPDS were included. Postoperative complications and episodes of recurrent instability were noted. Results: A total of 1322 studies were initially identified, of which 9 were deemed eligible for inclusion in our review. Among included studies, a total of 97 shoulders (96 patients) with a mean age of 37.7 years (range, 26-51) were identified. The most common mechanisms of injury included trauma, seizure, and electrocution. Reverse Hill-Sachs lesions ranged in size from 20% to 50% of the humeral head articular surface. At final follow-up, the weighted mean University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score, Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, and visual analog scale for pain score were 29 (range, 27-31), 75 (range, 65-92), 92 (range, 83-98), and 1.9 (range, 1-2.4), respectively. Postoperative Constant-Murley Score and University of California at Los Angeles scores were highest in the one study reporting exclusively on treatment during the acute period. Weighted mean postoperative forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were 154° (range, 102-176), 144° (range, 118-171), 64° (range, 44-84), and 47° (range, 42-56), respectively. Osteointegration of the lesser tuberosity was noted in all patients at the final follow-up. Postoperative complications occurred in one patient (1.0% of cohort); a screw migration successfully treated with operative removal. Recurrent instability was noted in two epileptic patients (2.1% of cohort). Conclusion: The literature surrounding the use of the modified McLaughlin procedure for LPDS remains sparse. This review demonstrates that this procedure is associated with favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes with overall low rates of complication and recurrent instability, especially when the time from injury to surgery is minimized. These findings illustrate that in patients presenting with LPDS and a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion between 20% and 50% of the humeral head articular surface, the modified McLaughlin procedure is a safe and effective treatment option.

Background: The goal of this study was to estimate the short-term (∼2 years) healthcare costs of failed primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) in the United States. Methods: A review of current literature was performed to estimate the number of RCR performed in the United States in the year 2022 and the rate of progression of these patients to lose repair continuity, reach clinical failure, and progress to nonoperative intervention and revision procedures. A review of the current literature was performed to estimate the costs incurred by these failures over the ensuing 2-year postoperative time period. Results: The direct and indirect healthcare costs of structural and clinical failure of primary RCR performed in 2022 are estimated to reach $438,892,670 in the short-term postoperative period. The majority of the costs come from the estimated $229,390,898 in nonoperative management that these patients undergo after they reach clinical failure. Conclusion: The short-term healthcare costs of failed arthroscopic RCR performed in the United States in 2022 are predicted to be $438,892,670. Although RCR improves quality of life, pain, function, and is cost-effective, there remains great potential for reducing the economic burden of failed RCR repairs on the US society. Investments into research aimed to improve RCR healing rates are warranted. Clinical Relevance: Although RCR improves quality of life, pain, function, and is cost-effective, this study provides evidence that there remains great potential for reducing the economic burden of failed RCR repairs on the US society. Investments into research aimed to improve RCR healing rates are warranted.

Background: The major complication and reoperation rates after distal triceps repair are poorly defined. The purpose of this large retrospective cohort study of distal triceps repairs performed by multiple surgeons within a large orthopedic group was to more clearly define the rates and risk factors of clinically impactful major complications and reoperations. Methods: All distal triceps tendon repairs for traumatic injuries performed from January 2006 to April 2017 with a minimum 2-month follow-up were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology code 24342. A total of 107 patients were included in this study. The primary outcome measure was total major complication rate. Reoperations, minor complications, and risk factors were also tracked. Results: Repairs were performed via bone tunnels (63.5%), suture anchors (13%), or a combination of the two (17.8%). A 14% complication rate and 13.1% reoperation rate were observed. Indication for reoperation included 9 reruptures, 3 infections, and 2 others. The time between injury and surgery was not found to be a risk factor for tendon rerupture. Smoking status, gender, utilization of a splint or controlled motion brace, and time to first active mobilization were not shown to influence rates or rerupture. Conclusion: Distal triceps repair for traumatic injuries is associated with 14% complication and 13.1% reoperation rates. Patient, rehabilitation, and surgeon-specific factors did not influence the complication rate.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has become a well-accepted treatment option for many pathologies of the elbow joint. Its use in distal humerus fractures in elderly patients has become increasingly popular and has good clinical results. However, with the aging population and the increasing number of TEAs performed, so comes the potential for an increasing number of revision TEA cases. Revision TEA can be extremely challenging. In addition to the technical difficulties of safe exposure and implant removal, reimplantation of a cemented humeral component with loss of bone stock can be a challenging step in this procedure. The purpose of this article was to describe a novel technique to address aseptic loosening of the humeral stem and loss of humeral bone stock with revision of the humeral component using a long-stemmed cemented implant and intramedullary allograft fibular strut bone grafting.

Background: Degenerative arthritis of the shoulder is a common condition that is successfully treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Rotator cuff disease has evolved as a leading cause of failure of anatomic TSA, requiring revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This revision procedure can be extremely complex, particularly if removal of a well-fixed glenoid component is necessary. This case series outlines the technique and preliminary clinical results of conversion of anatomic TSA to RSA utilizing both modular humeral and hybrid glenoid components. Methods: From July 2017 to December 2019, the senior author (PMC) performed 84 consecutive anatomic TSA procedures utilizing a modular humeral arthroplasty system and a unique hybrid glenoid component. Three cases (3/84, or 3.6%) required conversion from anatomic TSA to RSA because of postoperative traumatic rotator cuff failure. All modular revision cases were performed without humeral stem removal and with utilization of the existing, well-fixed hybrid glenoid central titanium peg as the foundation for glenoid component revision. Preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, visual analog scale pain scores, forward flexion, and patient satisfaction were analyzed in this modular revision group. In addition, several perioperative variables including operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were compared between this modular revision group and a nonmodular anatomic TSA to RSA revision comparative cohort. Results: At an average follow-up of 24 months, average active forward flexion, postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly compared with preoperative scores in the modular revision group. All three patients were satisfied with their outcome. The average total operative time (109 minutes vs. 154 minutes, P = .02), blood loss (183 cc vs. 500 cc, P = .08), and length of hospital stay (26.3 hours vs. 36.6 hours P < .05) were lower in the modular revision group than those in a nonmodular revision cohort. Conclusion: Revision of anatomic TSA to RSA utilizing a modular humeral system and a convertible hybrid glenoid component that does not require removal of a well-fixed central titanium peg which serves as the foundation for glenoid component revision was performed efficiently, safely, and successfully in three cases. This technique results in significantly improved clinical outcomes when revision to RSA is needed while potentially decreasing perioperative complications in the revision setting.

Uncontrolled electric vehicle (EV) charging loads at a workplace could result in hefty demand charges. Several studies in the literature have focused on mitigating these demand charges at workplaces using aggregator-based centralized control and consensus-based distributed control. Though each model has successfully mitigated the demand charges they all show some limitations. Aggregator-based centralized solver is computation and time intensive while consensus-based distributed control is communication intensive. Other works with algorithms exploring demand charge mitigation also often rely on large amounts communications. These algorithms include water filling algorithms, multiobjective optimization, and a fuzzy logic controller. The machine learning-based (ML) approach investigated in this study seeks to eliminate both drawbacks using the model trained on optimization results obtained with existing methods. The investigation of ML-based controller in this study is not only found to be superior in performance due to speed and accuracy metrics compared to existing control approaches but has also provided the promising resilient approach to deal with communication failure and cybersecurity threats.

Background: Biologic technologies can potentially augment existing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to improve retear rates and postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate healing rates and clinical outcomes of full-thickness rotator cuff repairs augmented with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant. Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, investigators enrolled 115 patients (mean age, 60.4 years) with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. There were 66 (57.4%) medium (1-3 cm) tears and 49 (42.6%) large (3-5 cm) tears. Eligible patients consisted of those ≥21 years of age with chronic shoulder pain lasting longer than 3 months and unresponsive to conservative therapy. Patients underwent single- or double-row repair augmented with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant. At the baseline, 3 months, and 1 year, magnetic resonance imaging was performed and patients were assessed for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). The primary failure end point was retear, classified as any new full-thickness defect observed on magnetic resonance imaging. Results: There were 13 retears (11.3%) at 3 months, with an additional 6 (19 total [16.5%]) found at 1 year. In large tears, double-row repair had a significantly lower rate of retear at 3 months (P = .0004) and 1 year (P = .0001) compared with single-row repair. ASES and CMS scores significantly improved between the baseline and 1 year for medium and large tears. At 1 year, the minimally clinically important difference for ASES and CMS was met by 91.7% (95% CI: 84.9-96.1) and 86.4% (95% CI: 78.2-92.4) of patients, respectively. Patients without retear and those

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost of shoulder arthroplasty (SA) performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) compared with SA performed in hospital-based surgery settings. Methods: The State Inpatient Databases and the State Ambulatory Surgery Databases were queried for patients undergoing primary or reverse SA between 2010 and 2014 in 5 states in either the inpatient (IP), hospital outpatient department (HOPD), or ASC setting. Outcomes included all-cause readmissions, emergency department visits within the 90-day postoperative period, and charges. Covariates included patient demographic data and procedure details. Risk factors for readmission were calculated using logistic regression analysis. Results: We identified 795 ASC (2%), 183 HOPD (0.5%), 38,114 (97.5%) SA procedures. The outpatient cohort was overall younger and healthier with a lower percentage of diabetes (14.1% vs. 20.2%), cardiopulmonary disease (11.4% vs. 20.4%), and obesity (10.7% vs. 15.6%). The US state and obesity were factors significantly (P < .0001) associated with readmission. The median IP charge was $62,905 (range, $41,327-$87,881) vs. $37,395 (range, $21,976-$61,775) for combined outpatient cases. When outpatient SA was stratified into ASC and HOPD cases, the median charges were $31,790 for ASC cases vs. $55,990 for HOPD cases (P < .0001). After adjustment for multiple covariates, the charges for combined outpatient SA surgery were 40% lower than those for IP SA surgery (P < .0001). Conclusion: As the current health care climate shifts toward lower-cost and higher-quality care, this study demonstrates that SAs performed in ASCs have a comparable safety profile to and significant financial advantage over SAs performed in the hospital-based setting.

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament injuries are common in the overhead-throwing athlete as the anterior band of this ligament is the primary soft tissue static stabilizer to valgus stress during a throwing motion. Various surgical techniques have been described over the past 30 years to address these injuries including Jobe, modified Jobe, docking, 3-stranded docking, Graftlink, and anatomic repairs with good to excellent results. Nevertheless, modifications to these techniques may increase the strength and survival of the reconstruction, which may expedite and optimize postoperative rehabilitation and return to play. Indications: This is a reproducible technique that provides excellent outcomes. We believe a 4-ply construct, with the addition of a high tensile strength suture tape, may provide superior biomechanical properties compared to other reconstructive techniques. Biomechanical testing for this technique is currently underway. Technique Description: Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a gracilis autograft passed from proximal to distal, secured at the ulna with a cortical button tension loop construct, and then repassed from distal to proximal with the addition of a high strength suture in parallel to function as an internal brace. Together, this creates a reinforced, 4-ply, ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with excellent tensile strength. Other advantages of this technique are that it avoids bony bridge fracture between ulnar tunnels, it preserves ulnar bone stock, creates a more anatomic insertion at the sublime tubercle and provides a simple method to tension the entire graft construct. Results: The expected outcomes from this procedure are consistently positive with recent literature reporting greater than 90% of patients having an excellent outcome and over 80% of overhead athletes returning to sport at or above previous level. Conclusion: This specific technique provides a rigid, high-tensile strength reconstruction with excellent outcomes and a high percentage of return to play. Additionally, this technique avoids various technical pitfalls by utilizing cortical button suspensory fixation at the ulna which minimizes complications such as ulnar tunnel conversion and iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve when drilling posterior to the sublime tubercle as is necessary with other techniques.