Search

BackgroundBreast cancer has the highest mortality rate among all cancers affecting females worldwide. Several new effective therapeutic strategies are being developed to minimize the number of breast cancer-related deaths and improve the quality of life of breast cancer patients. However, resistance to conventional therapies in breast cancer patients remains a challenge which could be due to several reasons, including changes in the tumor microenvironment. Attention is being diverted towards minimizing the resistance, toxicity, and improving the affordability of therapeutics for better breast cancer management. This includes personalized medicine, target-specific drug delivery systems, combinational therapies and artificial intelligence based screening and disease prediction. Nowadays, researchers and clinicians are also exploring the use of combinatorial immunotherapies in breast cancer patients, which have shown encouraging results in terms of improved survival outcomes. This study attempts to analyze the role of combinational immunotherapies in breast cancer patients, and offer insights into their effectiveness in breast cancer management.MethodologyWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for which we selected the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focused on completed Phase I/II/III/IV clinical trials investigating combination immunotherapies for breast cancer. The analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of combination therapies in comparison to mono-therapies, focusing on overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsWe observed that, combination immunotherapies significantly (P

Late detection and lack of precision diagnostics are the major challenges in cancer prevention and management. Biomarker discovery in specific cancers, especially at the pre-invasive stage, is vital for early diagnosis, positive treatment response, and good disease prognosis. Traditional diagnostic measures require invasive procedures such as tissue excision using a needle, an endoscope, and/or surgical resection which can be unsafe, expensive, and painful. Additionally, the presence of comorbid conditions in individuals might render them ineligible for undertaking a tissue biopsy, and in some cases, it is difficult to access tumours depending on the site of occurrence. In this context, liquid biopsies are being explored for their clinical significance in solid malignancies management. These non-invasive or minimally invasive methods are being developed primarily for identification of biomarkers for early diagnosis and targeted therapeutics. In this review, we have summarised the use and importance of liquid biopsy as significant tool in diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and therapeutic development. We have also discussed the challenges that are encountered and future perspective.

The global cancer cases and mortality rates are increasing and demand efficient biomarkers for accurate screening, detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that variations in epigenetic mechanisms like aberrant promoter methylation, altered histone modification and mutations in ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes play an important role in the development of carcinogenic events. However, the influence of other epigenetic alterations in various cancers was confirmed with evolving research and the emergence of high throughput technologies. Therefore, alterations in epigenetic marks may have clinical utility as potential biomarkers for early cancer detection and diagnosis. In this review, an outline of the key epigenetic mechanism(s), and their deregulation in cancer etiology have been discussed to decipher the future prospects in cancer therapeutics including precision medicine. Also, this review attempts to highlight the gaps in epigenetic drug development with emphasis on integrative analysis of epigenetic biomarkers to establish minimally non-invasive biomarkers with clinical applications.