Search

Pesticide overuse has resulted in serious ecological problems. Agricultural extension services play a key role in influencing farmers’ pesticide use. China has the world's largest public agricultural extension system, which has experienced a twisting path of reforms over the past four decades. However, there is little empirical evidence regarding the effects of agricultural extension services in the post-reform era since the mid-2000s. This study examines the effect of agricultural extension services in the post-reform era on pesticide use in China, using survey data of 1963 rice farmers in 2016 and 2018. Our results indicate that only 22.5% of surveyed farmers adopted agricultural extension services. After addressing the self-selectivity issue, the treatment effects model revealed that agricultural extension services in the post-reform era resulted in a 3.01 kg/ha reduction in total pesticide use, a 0.86 kg/ha reduction in application rate of active ingredients, and a 250 CNY/ha reduction in pesticide expenditure related to rice production. Our findings provide sound evidence that agricultural extension services in the post-reform era can result in a reduction in pesticide use for rice production. More effective efforts should be made to reinforce the provision of agricultural extension services and encourage farmers to adopt these services.

Direct seeding has been widely adopted in rice production due to its advantages of water- and labor-saving characteristics in China and other countries. This study aims to examine the effects of farmers’ adoption of direct seeding on the yield and fertilizer use in rice production in China. Using survey data of 1002 rice farmers in the Yangtze River Basin in China, the endogenous switching regression model is used to address the self-selectivity bias from both observed and unobserved heterogeneity. The results show that about 79% of surveyed farmers adopted direct seeding in rice production. After addressing the self-selectivity bias, the adoption of direct seeding increased rice yield among the adopters by 3.65%, and would have increased rice yield among the non-adopters by 1.54% if direct seeding had been adopted. In addition to its positive effect on rice yield, however, the adoption of direct seeding was also found to increase fertilizer use among the adopters by 19.84%, and would have increased fertilizer use among the non-adopters by 37.75% if direct seeding had been adopted. Moreover, farmers’ adoption of direct seeding exerted heterogeneous effects on rice yield and fertilizer use in terms of farm size and location.

Return migrants play an increasingly important role in agricultural production in China and other developing countries. However, the effect of rural–urban migration experience on farmers’ arable land use remains unclear. This study aims to fill this gap using data from a survey of 2293 farmers consisting of 586 return migrants and 1707 non-migrants in China. We employ the treatment effects model to account for the self-selectivity of rural–urban migration experience arising from observable and unobservable factors. The results show that after accounting for the self-selectivity bias, the rural–urban migration experience significantly increases farmers’ arable land use by 22%. Meanwhile, the positive effect of rural–urban migration experience on arable land use differs by farmers’ age group and region. While rural–urban migration experience increases arable land use for farmers aged below 65 years old by 29%, it shows no significant effect on arable land use for farmers aged 65 years old and above. In addition, there is a positive relationship between rural–urban migration experience and arable land use in Shaanxi, Shandong, and Zhejiang. However, there is no significant effect of rural–urban migration experience on arable land use. On such a basis, we discuss several important implications for policies related to arable land use in China.