Search

Abstract Cold pools formed by precipitating convective clouds are an important source of mesoscale temperature variability. However, their sub‐mesoscale (100 m–10 km) structure has not been quantified, impeding validation of numerical models and understanding of their atmospheric and societal impacts. We assess temperature variability in observed and simulated cold pools using variograms calculated from dense network observations collected during a field experiment and in high‐resolution case‐study and idealized simulations. The temperature variance in cold pools is enhanced for spatial scales between ∼5 and 15 km compared to pre‐cold pool conditions, but the magnitude varies strongly with cold pool evolution and environment. Simulations capture the overall cold pool variogram shape well but underestimate the magnitude of the variability, irrespective of model resolution. Temperature variograms outside of cold pool periods are represented by the range of simulations evaluated here, suggesting that models misrepresent cold pool formation and/or dissipation processes.

Abstract Global reanalyzes like ERA5 accurately capture atmospheric processes at spatial scales of O(10) km or larger. By downscaling ERA5 with large‐eddy simulation (LES), LES can provide details about processes at spatio‐temporal scales down to meters and seconds. Here, we present an open‐source Python package named the “Large‐eddy simulation and Single‐column model—Large‐Scale Dynamics,” or (LS)2D in short, designed to simplify the downscaling of ERA5 with doubly‐periodic LES. A validation with observations, for several sensitivity experiments consisting of month‐long LESs over Cabauw (the Netherlands), demonstrates both its usefulness and limitations. The day‐to‐day variability in the weather is well captured by (LS)2D and LES, but the setup under‐performs in conditions with broken or near overcast clouds. As a novel application of this modeling system, we used (LS)2D to study surface solar irradiance variability, as this quantity directly links land‐surface processes, turbulent transport, and clouds, to radiation. At a horizontal resolution of 25 m, the setup reproduces satisfactorily the solar irradiance variability down to a timescale of seconds. This demonstrates that the coupled LES‐ERA5 setup is a useful tool that can provide details on the physics of turbulence and clouds, but can only improve on its host reanalysis when applied to meteorological suitable conditions.

The diurnal cycle of environmental conditions for shallow and deep convection regimes within the Indian monsoon environment is investigated using comprehensive observations from the surface, boundary layer, and cloud layers. For shallow convection (SC) and deep convection (DC) in the afternoon hours, thermodynamics, moisture convergence, and several other environmental variables provide information on the factors that control the vertical extent of convection in both regimes. The SC regime is characterized by high sensible heat flux, leading to stronger boundary layer turbulence, a higher mixed layer, and increased dry air entrainment from the free troposphere. Evaluation of several pre-conditioning parameters with T-test statistics suggests that stronger mid-level meridional wind shear and lack of mid-level moistening are detrimental to the growth of clouds in the SC regime. Conversely, the DC regime is driven by low surface fluxes and low surface-level buoyancy, with higher boundary layer and mid-layer moisture and more mid-layer instability, supporting larger Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE). Morning precursor conditions for the preference of SC versus DC regime in the afternoon reveal that total column water vapor, relative humidity and CAPE are significantly higher on DC days. Large-scale moisture transport in the early morning within and above the boundary layer, driven by stronger westerly winds, is a key factor for the development of DC later in the day. This investigation enhances our understanding of boundary layer controls on shallow and deep convection within the Indian Monsoon environment.

Abstract This study investigates the role of interactive sea surface temperature (SST) in the early development of aggregated convection using a vector vorticity equation cloud‐resolving model coupled to a slab ocean. The simulations are initialized by a mock Walker circulation driven by initial SST gradient in the elongated x axis, with an average of 300 K and sinusoidal variation of amplitude ranging from 1.5 to 3 K. According to large‐scale perturbation strength, which is caused by SST variation, the results can be divided into two groups. Under weak perturbation, convection‐SST feedback efficiently eliminates SST gradient and moisture anomaly. The large‐scale environment is homogenized within 2 days. Even though SST in the group with stronger perturbation undergoes a similar process, significant moist static energy (MSE) advection in the boundary produces enough moisture difference to introduce virtual temperature effect and aggregation is triggered. Once dry zone starts to expand, radiative and convective effects regenerate SST gradient, which intensifies circulation and accelerates the process. We further show that the evolution of aggregation or not is captured by the trend of MSE‐EIS (estimated inversion strength) variance. The results highlight the boundary layer processes on the formation of aggregated convection in the tropics.

An observing network has been established along the United States west coast that provides up to 20 years of observations to support early warning, preparedness and studies of atmospheric rivers (ARs). The Hydrometeorology Testbed−West Legacy Observing Network, a suite of upper air and surface observing instruments, is now an official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) observing system with real-time data access provided via publicly available websites. This regional network of wind profiling radars and co-located instruments also provides observations of boundary layer processes such as complex-terrain flows that are not well depicted in the current operational rawindsonde and radar networks, satellites, or in high-resolution models. Furthermore, wind profiling radars have been deployed ephemerally for projects or campaigns in other areas, some with long records of observations. Current research uses of the observing system data are described as well as experimental products and services being transitioned from research to operations and applications. We then explore other ways in which this network and data library provide valuable resources for the community beyond ARs, including evaluation of high-resolution numerical weather prediction models and diagnosis of systematic model errors. Other applications include studies of gap flows and other terrain-influenced processes, snow level, air quality, winds for renewable energy and the predictability of cloudiness for solar energy industry.