Search

The pulmonary valve is the most frequently replaced cardiac valve in congenital heart diseases. Whether the valve alone or part of the right ventricular outflow tract have to be repaired or replaced depends on the specific pathological anatomy of the malformation. Once the decision to replace the pulmonary valve has been made, two options are available: the isolated transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement and the surgical implantation of a prosthetic valve either isolated or in combination with a procedure on the right ventricular outflow tract. In this paper, we will focus on the different past and present surgical options and present a new concept called “endogenous tissue restoration,” a promising alternative to the hitherto existing implants. From a general point of view, neither the transcatheter nor the surgical valvular implants are magic bullets in the arsenal for the management of valvular diseases. Smaller valves have to be frequently replaced because of outgrowth of the patients, larger tissue valves may present late structural valve deterioration, while xenograft and homograft conduits may calcify and therefore become narrowed within unpredictable incidence and interval following implantation. Based on long-term research efforts combining the knowledge of supramolecular chemistry, electrospinning, and regenerative medicine, endogenous tissue restoration has emerged most recently as a promising option to create long-term functioning implants. This technology is appealing because following resorption of the polymer scaffold and timely replacement through autologous tissue, no foreign material remain at all in the cardiovascular system. Proof-of-concept studies as well as small first-in-man series have been completed and have demonstrated favorable anatomic and hemodynamic results, comparable to currently available implants in the short term. Based on the initial experience, important modifications to improve the pulmonary valve function have been initiated.

Objectives: We report the first use of a biorestorative valved conduit (Xeltis pulmonary valve–XPV) in children. Based on early follow-up data the valve design was modified; we report on the comparative performance of the two designs at 12 months post-implantation.Methods: Twelve children (six male) median age 5 (2 to 12) years and weight 17 (10 to 43) kg, had implantation of the first XPV valve design (XPV-1, group 1; 16 mm (n = 5), and 18 mm (n = 7). All had had previous surgery. Based on XPV performance at 12 months, the leaflet design was modified and an additional six children (five male) with complex malformations, median age 5 (3 to 9) years, and weight 21 (14 to 29) kg underwent implantation of the new XPV (XPV-2, group 2; 18 mm in all). For both subgroups, the 12 month clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared.Results: All patients in both groups have completed 12 months of follow-up. All are in NYHA functional class I. Seventeen of the 18 conduits have shown no evidence of progressive stenosis, dilation or aneurysm formation. Residual gradients of >40 mm Hg were observed in three patients in group 1 due to kinking of the conduit (n = 1), and peripheral stenosis of the branch pulmonary arteries (n = 2). In group 2, one patient developed rapidly progressive stenosis of the proximal conduit anastomosis, requiring conduit replacement. Five patients in group 1 developed severe pulmonary valve regurgitation (PI) due to prolapse of valve leaflet. In contrast, only one patient in group 2 developed more than mild PI at 12 months, which was not related to leaflet prolapse.Conclusions: The XPV, a biorestorative valved conduit, demonstrated promising early clinical outcomes in humans with 17 of 18 patients being free of reintervention at 1 year. Early onset PI seen in the XPV-1 version seems to have been corrected in the XPV-2, which has led to the approval of an FDA clinical trial.Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02700100 and NCT03022708.