Search

To purchase or authenticate to the full-text of this article, please visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2008.00531.x Byline: AMANDA ROBINSON (1), KIRSTY HUDSON (2), FIONA BROOKMAN (3) Keywords: multi-agency work; victims; sexual assault; sexual violence; SARC Abstract: Abstract: The current policy climate in Britain requires that agencies work together to improve their performance and provide a better service to clients. This is especially apparent in recent initiatives designed to improve the services afforded to victims of crime. Whilst there is an established literature dealing with both the potential benefits of, and challenges posed by, multi-agency work (for example, Crawford 1997; Hughes 2007; Maguire 2004; Pearson et al. 1992; Taylor 2003), the unique issues arising from multi-agency partnerships dealing with sexual violence have received less attention, even though the interface of criminal justice and health is a relatively new and unusual phenomenon warranting scrutiny. For the current study, interviews with professionals working together to develop a Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) were conducted to address this gap. Positive aspects of multi-agency work identified by the respondents included: a shared concern over the poor quality of existing arrangements; a shared vision for a better response to victims; sharing a broader view of the victim; and having experience with, and commitment to, multi-agency work. Continuing challenges were noted as: sustained multi-agency participation; diverse agency cultures; competing agendas and priorities across agencies and systems; funding and staffing issues; and future responsibility for, and ownership of, the SARC. Implications of the research are discussed. Author Affiliation: (1)Senior Lecturer in Criminology and Criminal Justice, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University (2)Lecturer in Criminology and Criminal Justice, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University (3)Reader in Criminology and Criminal Justice, Centre for Criminology, University of Glamorgan Article History: Date submitted: October 2007Date accepted: March 2008

This article argues that legal advice is particularly important for young suspects and pre-trial remand prisoners. We explore the experience of these two groups in accessing legal advice and consider whether it breaches Article 6(3)(c) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), which guarantees the right to consult a lawyer when charged with a criminal offence. We find that, whilst policies may appear compatible on paper, the reality in terms of practice is more problematic. As well as considering the implications of the HRA where contraventions persist, we suggest several reforms which might ensure compliance.

This article examines the nature of two predominant forms of masculine male-on-male) homicide identified in England and Wales--"confrontational" homicide and "revenge" homicide. Based on analysis of police murder investigation files, [...]