1. Assessing the intensity of sexual selection on male body mass and antler length in roe deer Capreolus capreolus: is bigger better in a weakly dimorphic species?
- Author
-
Vanpe, Cecile, Gaillard, Jean-Michel, Kjellander, Petter, Liberg, Olof, Delorme, Daniel, and Hewison, A.J. Mark
- Subjects
Natural selection ,Environmental issues - Abstract
To authenticate to the full-text of this article, please visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18312.x Byline: Cecile Vanpe, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Petter Kjellander, Olof Liberg, Daniel Delorme, A. J. Mark Hewison Abstract: Little is known about traits under sexual selection in territorial mammals with low sexual size dimorphism. We examined the potential for sexual selection on male body mass and antler length in the European roe deer Capreolus capreolus, a territorial ungulate in which males are less than 10% heavier than females. Independently, both body mass and antler length (irrespective of age) had a positive effect on male yearly breeding success. However, when corrected for body mass, antler length at a given mass only had a slight effect on male breeding success. This suggests that: (1) 'bigger is better' and (2) sexual selection is responsible for at least part of the observed variation in body mass and antler length in roe deer. High body mass and large antlers may be advantageous to males for two reasons: (1) they enhance fighting ability and dominance, so allowing males to defend better their territory and hence access mates, and (2) they attract females because they are honest signals of male phenotypic quality. This suggests that, even in weakly dimorphic ungulate species, sexual selection may lead to a marked influence of body mass on male breeding success, as long as body mass is also strongly selected in females. Author Affiliation: (1)Laboratoire Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage, Inst. National de la Recherche Agronomique, BP 52627, FR-31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France (2)Laboratoire de Biometrie et Biologie Evolutive, Univ. Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, FR-69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France (3)Grimso Wildlife Research Station, Dept of Ecology, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Science (SLU), SE-73091 Riddarhyttan, Sweden (4)Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Centre National de Recherches Appliquees sur les Cervides-Sanglier, 1 Place Exelmans, FR-55000 Bar-le-Duc, France Article History: Paper manuscript accepted 7 January 2010 Article note: A. J. M. Hewison, Laboratoire Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage, Inst. National de la Recherche Agronomique, BP 52627, FR-31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France. E-mail: mark.hewison@toulouse.inra.fr
- Published
- 2010