Search

It is unclear whether nonhuman animals can use physical tokens to flexibly represent various quantities by combining token values. Previous studies showed that chimpanzees (Pan trogloclytes) and a macaque (Macaca mulatta) were only partly successful in tests involving sets of different-looking food containers representing different food quantities, while some capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) have shown greater success in tests involving sets of various concrete objects representing different food quantities. Some of the discrepancy in results between these studies may be attributed to the different methods used. In an effort to reconcile these discrepancies, we presented two primates species, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, with two token tasks. The critical test in each task involved summing the value of multiple tokens of different types to make accurate quantity judgments. We found that, using either method, individuals of both species learned to associate individual tokens with specific quantities, as well as successfully compare individual tokens to one another or to sets of visible food items. However, regardless of method, only a few individuals exhibited the capacity to sum multiple tokens of different types and then use those summed values to make an optimal response. This suggests that flexible combination of symbolic stimuli in quantity judgments tasks is within the abilities of chimpanzees and capuchins but does not characterize the majority of individuals. Furthermore, the results suggest the need to carefully examine specific methodological details that may promote or hinder such possible representation. Keywords: quantity representation, summation, token, chimpanzee, capuchin monkey DOI: 10.1037/a0019855

The authors investigated choice behavior by chimpanzees in five experiments involving choices between different amounts of food. Chimpanzees did not maximize the amount of food they obtained when choosing between a single 20-g banana piece and another option containing a 20-g piece and a 5-g piece. This was true even though they successfully discriminated between 20-g and 25-g banana pieces in other trials. When items in the mixed option were stacked, however, the chimpanzees chose the larger amount. Later experiments indicated that changing the magnitude of the two amounts did not change performance if the difference in magnitude between the two options remained the same (e.g., 40 g plus 10 g vs. 40 g). However, chimpanzees did improve when the two-item option was increased in its magnitude relative to the single slice (e.g., 20 g plus 10 g vs. 20 g). These results indicated that chimpanzees undervalued the total amount of food in sets when items differed in size and did not appear to be whole. Another experiment confirmed that it was this notion of wholeness that evoked suboptimal responding because chimpanzees were successful in the same comparisons with a different type of food that appeared less fractionated when presented as two pieces. These results provide evidence of suboptimal responding in some natural choice situations that prevents chimpanzees from maximizing food intake. Keywords: chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, choice, magnitude, wholeness DOI: 10.1037/a0015488

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2008.11.002 Byline: Michael J. Beran (a), Chasity L. Ratliff (b), Theodore A. Evans (a) Keywords: Chimpanzees; Pan troglodytes; Natural choice; Selective value effect; Foraging; Decision-making Abstract: In three experiments, four chimpanzees made choices between two visible food options to assess the validity of the selective value effect (the assignment of value to only the most preferred type of food presented in a comparison). In Experiment 1, we established that all chimpanzees preferred single banana pieces to single apple pieces before presenting the critical test. In this test two chimpanzees preferred a mix of one banana piece and one apple piece to a single banana piece when both banana pieces were approximately the same size, but two chimpanzees were indifferent between the two options, exhibiting the selective value effect. In Experiment 2, when the banana pieces in both options were more closely equated in size, the chimpanzees were biased to choose the single banana piece over the mixed array even though this was the smaller total amount of food. However, in Experiment 3, when we introduced longer intervals between each trial, the chimpanzees preferred the mixed set and thus the larger total amount of food. The results demonstrate that only some chimpanzees exhibit the choice pattern indicative of the selective value effect, and they do so only when item size is not carefully controlled and trials are presented quickly in succession. Thus, the behavior pattern originally labeled the selective value effect may actually be explained by a combination of chimpanzees' sensitivity to small differences in preferred food amount and chimpanzees tendency to avoid less preferred foods that would delay the acquisition of further preferred food items. Author Affiliation: (a) Language Research Center, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA (b) Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA Article History: Received 2 September 2008; Revised 25 October 2008

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.035 Byline: Michael J. Beran, Theodore A. Evans, Emily H. Harris Abstract: Nonhuman animals reliably select the largest of two or more sets of discrete items, particularly if those items are food items. However, many studies of these numerousness judgements fail to control for confounds between amount of food (e.g. mass or volume) and number of food items. Stimulus dimensions other than number of items also may influence how animals perceive sets and make choices. Four chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, completed a variety of tasks that involved comparisons of food items (graham crackers) that varied in number, size and orientation. In experiment 1, chimpanzees chose between two alternative sets of visible cracker pieces. In experiment 2, the experimenters presented one set of crackers in a vertical orientation (stacked) and the other in a horizontal orientation. In experiment 3, the experimenters presented all food items one at a time by dropping them into opaque containers. Chimpanzees succeeded overall in choosing the largest amount of food. They did not rely on number or contour length as cues when making these judgements but instead primarily responded to the total amount of food in the sets. However, some errors reflected choices of the set with the smaller total amount of food but the individually largest single food item. Thus, responses were not optimal because of biases that were not related to the total amount of food in the sets. Author Affiliation: Language Research Center, Georgia State University, U.S.A. Article History: Received 16 May 2007; Revised 14 July 2007; Accepted 29 October 2007 Article Note: (miscellaneous) MS. number: A10772R

Ordinal learning was investigated in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). In Experiment 1, both species were presented with pairings of the Arabic numerals 0 to 9. Some monkeys were given food rewards equal to the value of the numeral selected and some were rewarded with a single pellet only for choosing the higher numeral within the pair. Both species learned to select the larger numeral, but only rhesus monkeys that were differentially rewarded performed above chance levels when presented with novel probe pairings. In Experiment 2, the monkeys were first presented with arrays of 5 familiar numerals (from the range 0 to 9) and then arrays of 5 novel letters (from the range A to J) with the same reward outcomes in place as in Experiment 1. Both species performed better with the numerals, suggesting that an ordinal sequence of all stimuli had been learned during Experiment 1, rather than a matrix of two-choice discriminations. Keywords: ordinality, capuchin monkeys, rhesus monkeys, cebus apella, macaca mulatta

Learning styles in capuchin monkeys were assessed with a computerized reversal-learning task called the mediational paradigm. First, monkeys were trained to respond with 90% accuracy on a two-choice discrimination (A+B-). Then the authors examined differences in performance on three different types of reversal trials (A-B+, A-C+, B+C-), each of which offered differing predictions for performance, depending on whether the monkeys were using associative cues or rule-based strategies. Performance indicated that the monkeys mainly learned to avoid the B stimulus during training, as the A-C+ condition produced the best performance levels. Therefore, negative stimuli showed greater control over responding after reversal and reflected a more associative rather than rule-based form of learning., Reports of cognitive abilities in a variety of animal species have surged in recent years (e.g., Wasserman & Zentall, 2006). Many of these reports emerged from studies with nonhuman primates, [...]

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2007.02.001 Byline: Theodore A. Evans Keywords: Self-control; Delay of gratification; Delay; Effort; Rhesus monkey; Macaca mulatta Abstract: The variables of delay and effort have been found to influence self-control predictably and in similar fashion when tested independently, but it is unclear how they influence self-control interactively. In the present study, I tested these two variables simultaneously to gain better understanding of their combined influence on self-control. A computerized task was employed in which monkey participants could sequence 1 or more digital images before 'cashing-out,' after which they would receive their accumulated rewards. Delay was manipulated by adjusting the speed of the cursor used to select images. Cognitive effort was manipulated by presenting image sets that appeared in either a constant or a randomized configuration. For most monkeys, an interaction was found between the effects of delay and effort on the number of images selected before cashing-out. The results suggest that, when combined, these two variables have a complex influence on self-control. Author Affiliation: Language Research Center, Georgia State University, 3401 Panthersville Road, Decatur, GA 30034, USA Article History: Received 24 October 2006; Revised 7 February 2007 Article Note: (footnote) [star] This research was supported by grant HD-38051 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. All applicable institutional rules and regulations regarding animal care and use have been followed in the care and testing of the macaques. The experiments complied with all laws of the United States of America. I thank Michael Beran for thoughtful discussion of methodological issues relevant to this study and both Michael Beran and Emily Klein for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Self-control is defined as forgoing immediate gratification to obtain a greater reward. Tool use may relate to self-control because both behaviors may require foresight and deliberate control over one's actions. The authors assessed 20 capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) tot the ability to delay gratification in a tool task. Subjects were given rod-shaped food items that could either be consumed immediately or be carried to an apparatus and used to extract a more preferred food. The authors found that some monkeys were able to exhibit self-control. Monkeys with relatively more tool use experience demonstrated the greatest levels of self-control. These results indicate that capuchins are capable of delaying gratification when a higher quality reinforcer is present and that tool experience can influence levels of self-control in this task. Keywords: tool, self-control, capuchin, Cebus apella

Research on cross-modal performance in nonhuman primates is limited to a small number of sensory modalities and testing methods. To broaden the scope of this research, the authors tested capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) for a seldom-studied cross-modal capacity in nonhuman primates, auditory--visual recognition. Monkeys were simultaneously played 2 video recordings of a face producing different vocalizations and a sound recording of 1 of the vocalizations, Stimulus sets varied from naturally occurring conspecific vocalizations to experimentally controlled human speech stimuli. The authors found that monkeys preferred to view face recordings that matched presented vocal stimuli. Their preference did not differ significantly across stimulus species or other stimulus features. However, the reliability of the latter set of results may have been limited by sample size. From these results, the authors concluded that capuchin monkeys exhibit auditory visual cross-modal perception of conspecific vocalizations. Keywords: cross-modal, auditory-visual communication, capuchin

Contrary to the common perception that termites are indiscriminant eaters, termites choose their food carefully; however, the methods by which they choose food are not well understood. Using choice experiments and recordings of termites feeding on wooden blocks of different sizes, we show that worker drywood termites (Cryptotermes domesticus) use the resonant frequency of a block of wood to assess its size. Drywood termites showed differences in their response to vibration recordings of termites compared with artificially generated signals, suggesting that they can discriminate the source of vibration. Furthermore, fewer workers matured into neotenic reproductives when recorded termite signals were played, suggesting that vibration signals play an important role in termite communication. foraging | vibroacoustic | communication | social insects

Using techniques established by E. M. Brannon and H. S. Terrace (2000) with rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta), the authors tested the ability of brown capuchins (Cebus alpella) to order arrays of items ranging in quantity from 1 to 9. Three monkeys were trained on a touch screen to select the quantities 1-4 in ascending order. The monkeys exhibited successful transfer of this ability to novel representations of the quantities 1-4 and to pairs of the novel quantities 5-9. Patterns of responding with respect to numeric distance and magnitude were similar to those seen in human subjects, suggesting the use of similar psychological processes. The capuchins demonstrated an ordinal representation of quantity equivalent to that shown in Old World monkeys.

Experiments were conducted to assess the quantity judgments of capuchins when responding to sets of food items, identical in food type but differing in number, at the time of response. Results showed response to quantitative differences between sets.

A mixture of hydrogenated compounds results from the reduction of C60 with rhodium on alumina and hydrogen in deuterated benzene (C6D6) at ambient temperature and pressure. H NMR facilitates the characterization of the key product, C60H2, obtained in 14% yield. The yield of C60H2 decreases within 24 hours of attaining peak concentration.

Matriphagy, where the young consume the mother, may be a survival adaptation of the Australian social spider Diaea ergandros. The mother's weight is directly correlated to the number of surviving offspring because the heavier the mother, the longer before the spiderlings turn to cannibalism of siblings. Additionally, the mother spiders appear to have a physiological adaptation to encourage matriphagy because, after the one clutch carried by this species, the ovaries redevelop with nonviable oocytes which may be designed to provide extra nutrients for the offspring.