1. Assessing indices for predicting potential nitrogen mineralization in soils under different management systems
- Author
-
Schomberg, Harry H., Wietholter, Sirio, Griffin, Timothy S., Reeves, D. Wayne, Cabrera, Miguel L., Fisher, Dwight S., Endale, Dinku M., Novak, Jeff M., Balkcom, Kip S., Raper, Randy L., Kitchen, Newell R., Locke, Martin A., Potter, Kenneth N., Schwartz, Robert C., Truman, Clinton C., and Tyler, Don D.
- Subjects
Tillage -- Environmental aspects ,Soil mineralogy -- Research ,Soils -- Nitrogen content ,Soils -- Properties ,Earth sciences - Abstract
A reliable laboratory index of N availability would be useful for making N recommendations, but no single approach has received broad acceptance across a wide range of soils. We compared several indices over a range of soil conditions to test the possibility of combining indices for predicting potentially mineralizable N ([N.sub.0]). Soils (0-5 and 5-15 cm) from nine tillage studies across the southern USA were used in the evaluations. Long-term incubation data were fit to a first-order exponential equation to determine [N.sub.0], k (mineralization rate), and [N.sub.0.sup.*] ([N.sub.0] estimated with a fixed k equal to 0.054 [wk.sup.-1]). Out of 13 indices, five [total C (TC), total N (TN), N mineralized by hot KC1 (Hot_N), anaerobic N (Ana_N), and N mineralized in 24 d (Nmin_24)] were strongly correlated to NO (r > 0.85) and had linear regressions with [r.sup.2] > 0.60. None of the indices were good predictors of k. Correlations between indices and [N.sub.0.sup.*] improved compared with [N.sub.0], ranging from r = 0.90 to 0.95. Total N and flush of C[O.sub.2] determined after 3 d (Fl_C[O.sub.2]) produced the best multiple regression for predicting [N.sub.0] ([R.sup.2] = 0.85) while the best combination for predicting [N.sub.0.sup.*] ([R.sup.2] = 0.94) included TN, Fl_CO2 Cold_N, and NaOH_N. Combining indices appears promising for predicting potentially mineralizable N, and because TN and Fl_CO2 are rapid and simple, this approach could be easily adopted by soil testing laboratories. Abbreviations: Ana_N, anaerobic N mineralization; TC, total carbon; Ca_hypcl, calcium hypochlorite; Cold_N, KCl extractable N[O.sub.3]--N; CT, conventional tillage; Fl_CO2, flush of C[O.sub.2] during 3 d; Hot_N, hot KCl extractable N[H.sub.4]- -N; Hyd_N, hydrolyzable N; k, mineralization rate constant; TN, total nitrogen; NaOH_N, sodium hydroxide distillable N; [N.sub.0], potentially mineralizable N; [N.sub.0.sup.*], value of [N.sub.0] determined using a fixed value for k, Nmin_24, N mineralization during 24 d; NP, not plowed (prairie soil); NT, no-Tillage; NT+SS, no-tillage with non-inversion subsurface deep tillage; PB_N, phosphate- berate distillable N; POMC, particulate organic matter C; POMN, particulate organic matter N; SM, stubble mulch tillage (sweeps to undercut weeds); ST, strip tillage (in-row subsoil for disruption of subsurface pan and coulters for preparation of narrow strip of tilled soil).
- Published
- 2009