Search

Background: HER2-low expression has gained clinical relevance in breast cancer (BC) due to the availability of anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates for patients with HER2-low metastatic BC. The well-reported instability of HER2-low status during disease evolution highlights the need to identify patients with HER2-0 primary BC who may develop a HER2-low phenotype at relapse. In response to the urgency of maximizing treatment access, we utilized artificial intelligence to predict this occurrence., Patients and Methods: We included a large multicentric retrospective cohort of patients with BC who underwent tissue resampling at relapse. The dataset was preprocessed to address relevant issues such as missing data, feature abundance, and target class imbalance. We then trained two models: one focused on explainability [Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)] and another aimed at performance (an ensemble of XGBoost and support vector machine)., Results: A total of 1200 patients were included in this study. Among 386 patients with HER2-0 primary BC and matched HER2 status at relapse, 42.5% (n = 157) converted to a HER2-low phenotype. The explainable model achieved a balanced accuracy of 58%, with a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 64%. The most important variables for this model were primary BC phenotype [mean Shapley value (SHAP) 0.540], primary BC histological type (SHAP 0.101), grade (SHAP 0.182), and sites of relapse (SHAP 0.008-0.213). The ensemble model had a balanced accuracy of 64%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 53%., Conclusions: This work represents one of the first proof-of-concept applications of machine learning models to predict a highly relevant phenomenon for drug access in modern BC oncology. Starting with an explainable model and subsequently integrating it with an ensemble approach enabled us to enhance performance while maintaining transparency, explainability, and intelligibility., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of our retrospective study was to describe the immunophenotypic characteristics of neuroendocrine breast neoplasm (BNEN), a peculiar and rare type of breast carcinoma., Methods: Pathological data from 51 patients affected by BNEN were retrospectively evaluated, and 44 patients were considered eligible (7 patients with incomplete data were excluded). The patients were followed in six different Italian hospitals between 2009 and 2019. The histological samples, collected by biopsies and/or surgery pieces, were analyzed to determine: 1) tumor histology; 2) immunophenotypic pattern; 3) presence of lymphatic infiltration; 4) presence of necrosis., Results: The median age of the patients included in our analysis was 70 years (67.6±13.7 years). As concerns the histological type we identified 7 cases of well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (16%), 8 cases of poorly differentiated/small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (18%), 29 cases of breast carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation (66%). From the analysis of breast-specific immunophenotype we identified: 24 cases (54%) of Luminal A pattern; 9 cases (20%) of Luminal B pattern; 8 case (18%) of triple negative pattern. The presence of lymphatic infiltration was assessed in 29 samples and it was observed in 13 cases (45%), necrosis was assessed in 29 samples and was absent in 72% of all cases (21 samples). Neuroendocrine markers expression was heterogeneous with a prevalence of synaptophysin (positivity in 95%); chromogranin A was evaluated in 31 samples and it was positive in 58% of cases., Conclusions: in our series BNENs mainly affect a post-menopausal population and luminal A pattern is the most frequent immunophenotype. As expected, lymphatic infiltration is most frequently reported in invasive breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation; necrosis is absent in well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Synaptophysin and chromogranin A are important markers for the diagnosis of BNEN.

Background/objectives: HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC) is an aggressive subtype, with neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) aiming to achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) to improve long-term outcomes. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been established as the standard of care in the adjuvant setting for HER2 + BC patients who do not obtain pCR. The ATD study aimed to evaluate the real-world tolerability of T-DM1 in this setting. The secondary objective was to assess the effectiveness., Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective study across 24 Italian oncology centers, including 410 patients with HER2 + BC treated with adjuvant T-DM1 following a lack of pCR after NAT. Patient characteristics, NAT regimens, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Tolerability was assessed by documenting adverse events (AEs) according to the CTCAE (v5.0). Preliminary effectiveness was evaluated in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Overall, 228 patients (55.6%) experienced at least one AE related to T-DM1, with 4.9% experiencing grade 3 or higher AEs. The most common AEs were hepatotoxicity (18.5%) and thrombocytopenia (17.6%). T-DM1 was discontinued in 10.0% of patients due to toxicity. After a median follow-up of 25 months, 31 relapse events (7.6%) and 22 deaths (5.4%) were reported. The preliminary incidence of RFS and OS events was similar between patients who completed the T-DM1 course and those who discontinued it early., Conclusions: T-DM1 demonstrated a manageable safety profile, and the adverse events were consistent with those reported in randomized trials. The data are not yet sufficient to allow for a formal analysis of RFS and OS, and long-term follow-up is required.

Purpose : Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) therapy is the standard for non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%. Smoking-induced harm generates high tumor mutation burden (H-TMB) in smoking patients (S-pts), while never-smoking patients (NS-pts) typically have low TMB (L-TMB) and are unresponsive to IO. However, the molecular characterization of NS-pts with H-TMB remains unclear. Experimental design : Clinical data of 142 aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% treated with first line pembrolizumab were retrospectively collected. Next-generation sequencing was performed using the FoundationOne ® CDx assay to correlate genomic alterations with clinical characteristics and response outcomes. Detected mutations were classified into eleven main pathways and enrichment analysis identified patient subgroups based on mutated pathways. Additionally, a patient similarity network was constructed to analyze molecular characterization. Results were validated using data from 853 aNSCLC patients in POPLAR and OAK trials. Results : Among the patients, S-pts had higher TMB than NS-pts. Interestingly, 11 (8%) NS-pts exhibited H-TMB and were enriched in β-catenin/Wnt and DDR pathway mutations. DDR pathway mutations were confirmed to be enriched in NS-pts with H-TMB using data from POPLAR and OAK trials. In the real-world cohort, the NS/H-TMB subgroup with DDR pathway mutations demonstrated improved IO outcome. Patient similarity network analysis confirmed the clustering of NS/H-TMB patients with DDR mutations and their association with improved overall survival in both the real-world cohort and the trials. Conclusions : The DDR signature has a potential role as an additional generator of H-TMB in NS-pts. This subgroup of IO-responsive NS-pts may have better prognosis. Our findings suggest that DDR-based mutational profiling may help identify NS-pts who could benefit from IO therapy.

Immunotherapy has a crucial role in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, only a small percentage of patients achieve long-term benefit in terms of overall response and survival. It was shown that HNSCC has an immunosuppressive microenvironment due to high levels of regulatory T cells and immunosuppressive molecules, such as LAG3 and CD73. The aim of our study was to investigate if the expression of CD73 by neoplastic and immune cells could affect the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. We reviewed data from 50 patients with R/M HNSCC receiving first line immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy based on a combined positive score (CPS). CD73 expression by cancer and immune cells was evaluated on pre-treatment and the percentage of stained cells was recorded. We analysed the association between CD73 expression on neoplastic and immune cells and early progression (EP), defined as progression occurring within 3 months. In 88 % of patients the primary tumour site was in the oral cavity or larynx. All patients received pembrolizumab associated in 40 % of cases to chemotherapy. CD73 was positive in 82 % and 96 % of cases on neoplastic and immune cells, respectively. The median value of CD73 was 32 % for neoplastic cells and 10 % for the immune ones. We observed a significant association between the CD73 expression on neoplastic cells over the median value and EP disease. We didn't record a correlation between the expression of CD73 on immune cells and early progression. Our findings suggest that higher expression of CD73 on neoplastic cells could predict resistance to immunotherapy in patients with CPS positive R/M HNSCC. The addition of this biomarker to routine evaluation of CPS could help to select the patients primary resistant to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

In the last two-decades, innovative drugs have revolutionized cancer treatments, demonstrating a significant improvement in overall survival. These drugs may present several pharmacokinetics interactions with non-oncological drugs, and vice versa, and, non-oncological drugs can modify oncological treatment outcome both with pharmacokinetic interaction and with an "off-target impact" on the tumor microenvironment or on the peripheral immune response. It's supposed that the presence of a drug-drug interaction (DDI) is associated with an increased risk of reduced anti-tumor effects or severe toxicities. However, clinical evidence that correlate the DDI presence with outcome are few, and results are difficult to compare because of difference in data collection and heterogeneous population. This review reports all the clinical evidence about DDI to provide an easy-to-use guide for DDI management and dose adjustment in solid tumors treated with inhibitors of the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4-6, Antibody-drug conjugates, Poly ADPribose polymerase inhibitors, androgen-receptor targeted agents, or immunecheckpoints inhibitors., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All the authors declare no conflicts of interest for this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Abemaciclib demonstrated clinical benefit in women affected by HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (aBC). Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can lead to reduced treatment efficacy or increased toxicity. This retro-prospective study aimed to evaluate outcomes, DDIs' impact, and toxicities of abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy in a real-world setting. Patients from 12 referral Italian hospitals with HR+/HER2- aBC who received abemaciclib were included. Clinical data about comorbidities, concurrent medications, outcomes, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Drug-PIN® (Personalized Interactions Network) is a tool recognizing the role of multiple interactions between active and/or pro-drug forms combined with biochemical and demographic patient data. The software was used to define the Drug-PIN score and Drug-PIN tier (green, yellow, dark yellow, and red) for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of patients' PFS or toxicity. One hundred seventy-three patients were included. 13% of patients had >75years. The overall response rate (ORR) was 63%. The general population's median PFS (mPFS) was 22 months (mo), while mOS were not reached. Patients treated with abemaciclib in combination with AI and fulvestrant had a mPFS of 36 and 19 mo, respectively. The most common toxicities were diarrhea, asthenia, and neutropenia detected in 63%,49%, and 49% of patients. The number of concomitant medications and comorbidities were not associated with survival outcomes (22 vs 17 mo, p = 0.068, p = 0.99). Drug-PIN tier from dark yellow to red and Drug-PIN score >12 were associated with shorter PFS compared to no/low-risk DDIs and score <12 (15 vs 23, p = 0.005, p = 0.0017). Drug interaction was confirmed as an independent biomarker in a multivariate model (p = 0.02). No difference in any grade AE, severe toxicities, and diarrhea were detected among different age subgroups. No association was found between Drug-PIN score or Drug-PIN tier and overall toxicity (p = 0.44), severe AEs (p = 0.11), or drug reduction (p = 0.27). The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus ET were confirmed in a real-world setting, even in the elderly population and patients with comorbidities. Evaluation of DDIs with Drug-PIN appears to be an independent predictor of PFS., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The therapeutic landscape for early breast cancer (eBC) has expanded by introducing novel anticancer agents into clinical practice. During their reproductive years, women with eBC should be informed of the potential risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and infertility with the proposed systemic therapy. Although the topic of female fertility is becoming increasingly relevant in patients with cancer, limited information is available on the gonadotoxicity of new agents available for eBC treatment. Analyses from clinical trials and prospective data on ovarian function biomarkers are lacking. The purpose of this systematic review is to report the available preclinical and clinical data on female fertility risk with the use of the new agents that are part of clinical practice use or under development for eBC management. This review highlights the clear need to perform additional research efforts to improve our understanding on the gonoadtoxicity of new anticancer agents., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Matteo Lambertini reports advisory roles for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Exact Sciences; speaker honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Libbs, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, and Gilead; travel Grants from Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche; and research funding (to the Institution) from Gilead, all outside the submitted work. Andrea Botticelli has advisory and consulting roles for Roche, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Amgen, BMS, Gilead, Sofos, Daichii, and AstraZeneca. Simone Scagnoli reported speaker fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, BMS, and MSD. Advisory role for AstraZeneca and Daiichi-Sankyo., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: The classic paradigm for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) consists of (chemo)radiotherapy (C)RT), total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT). At present, due to the high rate of distant metastasis (up to 30%), the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with the administration of systemic CHT in the neoadjuvant setting has gained acceptance as standard of care.Our aim is to critically review the current literature on LARC management and summarize the different approaches recently proposed to improve clinical outcomes. It represents a starting step to develop an effective strategy that ultimately could harmonize the standard of care in daily clinical practice., Areas Covered: Studies reporting the impact of TNT approaches were deemed eligible. De-escalation strategies, including non-operative management (NOM) after TNT, as well as RT omission or systemic therapy alone, were also investigated., Expert Opinion: The year 2020 has seen promising new data from randomized phase III trials in the field of LARC management. Nowadays, TNT strategy has been accepted as the primary treatment for LARC. The role of de-escalation strategies is still unknown. The goal is to achieve better survival outcomes with improving quality of life. Only selected patients are likely to benefit from NOM or immunotherapy alone.

We aim at investigating the association between subclinical autoimmunity and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a cohort of patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid metastatic cancer. In the context of an oncology/rheumatology outpatient clinic, we evaluated patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Before treatment, each patient underwent a physical evaluation and a blood sample to identify the presence of a set of autoantibodies. Indeed, all the patients were followed during treatment to identify irAEs and to assess the association with autoantibodies. Fifty-one patients (M/F 16/35; median age 70 years, IQR 16.5) were evaluated; 34.8% of patients showed ANA positivity, 6.5% ENA positivity (anti-SSA), 4.3% Ratest positivity, and 2.1% (one patient) ACPA positivity. During a median period of 21 months (IQR 38.75), 39.2% of patients developed irAEs. Musculo-skeletal manifestations, in particular arthritis, were the most frequent. We found a significant association between the positivity for ANA and the development of irAES (p = 0.03, RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.03-3.92). Furthermore, the progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients developing irAEs compared to those who are not experiencing these events (p = 0.007). This study underlines the potential role of ANA positivity as a predictive biomarker for the development of irAEs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The KEYNOTE-048 trial showed that pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment for R/M HNSCC led to improved OS in the PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 population when compared to the EXTREME regimen. However, the R/M HNSCC real-world population is generally frailer, often presenting with multiple comorbidities, worse performance status and older age than the population included in phase III clinical trials., Methods: This is a retrospective, single-centre analysis of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment., Results: From February 2021 to March 2023, 92 patients were treated with pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment. Patients treated with pembrolizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy had better ECOG PS and younger age than those treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. Median PFS and OS were 4 months and 8 months, respectively. PFS was similar among patients treated with pembrolizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy, while patients treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy had worse OS (log-rank p =.001, HR 2.7). PFS and OS were improved in patients with PD-L1 CPS > = 20 (PFS: log-rank p =.005, HR 0.50; OS: log-rank p =.04, HR 0.57). Patients with higher ECOG PS scores had worse PFS and OS (PFS, log-rank p =.004; OS, log-rank p = 6e-04). In multivariable analysis, ECOG PS2 was associated with worse PFS and OS., Conclusions: PFS in our real-world cohort was similar to the KEYNOTE-048 reference while OS was numerically inferior. A deeper understanding of clinical variables that might affect survival outcomes of patients with R/M HNSCC beyond ECOG PS and PD-L1 CPS is urgently needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in patients with pretreated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, few data are available about its efficacy in routine clinical practice. In this multicenter retrospective study, we examined effectiveness and safety of T-DXd in a real-world population., Methods: Clinico-pathological information about patients with HER2+ mBC who received T-DXd were collected from 12 Italian hospitals. HER2 status was determined locally. Patients who received at least one administration of T-DXd, as any therapy line for advanced disease were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was real-word PFS (rwPFS)., Results: One hundred and forty-three patients were included. Median age was 66 (range: 37-90), and 4 men were included. Hormone receptor (HR) status was positive in 108 (75%) patients and negative in 35(25%). T-DXd was administered as first, second, third, or subsequent lines in 4 (3%), 16 (11%), 42 (29%), and 81 (57%) patients, respectively. Among 123 patients with measurable disease, the ORR was 68%, and the DCR was 93% (9 CRs, 74 PRs, and 30 SD). Nine (7%) patients had a primary resistance to T-DXd. With a median follow-up of 12 months, the median rwPFS was 16 months. RwPFS was 84%, 59%, and 39% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. A favorable trend in rwPFS was reported in patients receiving T-DXd as I/II line versus further lines (17 vs. 15 months; P = .098). Any-grade toxicity was registered in 84 patients (59%). Most common adverse events (AEs) reported were nausea (33%), neutropenia (21%), and asthenia (21%). Liver toxicity and diarrhea were uncommon (5% and 1%). Severe toxicities was registered in 18% of patients, and the most frequent were neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, and ILD observed in 15, 2, and 3 patients. AEs led to dose reduction in 37 patients (26%). Dose reduction and AEs do not affect patients' response and survival outcomes., Conclusions: Efficacy and safety of T-DXd were confirmed in an unselected real-world population of HER2+ mBC. These results are consistent with the results of known findings, and no new safety concerns were reported., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), administered alone or combined with chemotherapy, are the standard of care in advanced non-oncogene addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Despite these treatments' success, most long-term survival benefit is restricted to approximately 20% of patients, highlighting the need to identify novel biomarkers to optimize treatment strategies. In several solid tumors, immune soluble factors, the activatory CD137 + Tcells, and the immunosuppressive cell subsets Tregs and MDSCs (PMN(Lox1 + )-MDSC and M-MDSCs) correlated with responses to ICIs and clinical outcomes thus becoming appealing predictive and prognostic factors. This study investigated the role of distinct CD137 + Tcell subsets, Tregs, MDSCs, and immune-soluble factors in NSCLC patients as possible biomarkers., Methods: The levels of T cells, MDSCs and soluble factors were evaluated in 89 metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent ICIs as first- or second-line treatment. T cell analysis was performed by cytoflurimetry evaluating Tregs and different CD137 + Tcell subsets also combined with CD3 + , CD8 + , PD1 + , and Ki67 + markers. Circulating cytokines and immune checkpoints were also evaluated by Luminex analysis. All these parameters were correlated with several clinical factors (age, sex, smoking status, PS and TPS), response to therapy, PFS , and OS . The analyses were conducted in the overall population and in patients treated with ICIs as first-line (naïve patients)., Results: In both groups of patients, high levels of circulating CD137 + and CD137 + PD1 + T cells (total, CD4 and CD8) and the soluble factor LAG3 positively correlated with response to therapy. In naïve patients, PMN(Lox1 + )-MDSCs negatively correlated with clinical response, and a high percentage of Tregs was associated with favorable survival. Moreover, the balance between Treg/CD137 + Tcells or PMN(Lox1 + )-MDSC/CD137 + Tcells was higher in non-responding patients and was associated with poor survival. CD137 + Tcells and Tregs resulted as two positive independent prognostic factors., Conclusion: High levels of CD137 + , CD137 + PD1 + Tcells and sLAG3 could predict the response to ICIs in NSCLC patients independently by previous therapy. Combining the evaluation of CD137 + Tcells and Tregs also as Treg/CD137 + T cells ratio it is possible to identify naive patients with longer survival., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Breast cancer (BC) treatment has recently been revolutionized by the introduction of newer targeted agents, that helped tailoring therapies around the single patient. Along with increased survival rates, a careful evaluation of diet, lifestyle habits, physical activity, emotional and psychological experiences linked to the treatment journey, is now mandatory. However, a true proposal for an omnicomprehensive and "integrative" approach is still lacking in literature., Methods: A scientific board of internationally recognized specialists throughout different disciplines designed a shared proposal of holistic approach for BC patients., Results: A narrative review, containing information on BC treatment, endocrinological and diet aspects, physical activity, rehabilitation, integrative medicine, and digital narrative medicine, was developed., Conclusions: In the context of a patient-centered care, BC treatment cannot be separated from a patient's long-term follow-up and care, and an organized interdisciplinary collaboration is the future in this disease's cure, to make sure that our patients will live longer and better., Trial Registration: NCT05893368: New Model for Integrating Person-based Care (PbC) in the Treatment of Advanced HER2-negative Breast Cancer (PERGIQUAL). Registration date: 29th May 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the approach to metastatic triple-negative breast cancers. Atezolizumab was approved for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancers whose tumors express PD-L1, determined by SP 142 assay. To assess the availability and practice of SP142 test we administered a survey to all the 15 pathology departments of the Lazio Region during a six-month period., Methods: The survey comprised 12 questions regarding the availability of SP142 in the pathology departments, the percentage of positive tests, the difficulties of pathologists in cases close to cut-off value and the tested samples., Results: The SP142 assay was available in only eight centers. In case of positive result, most centers (5/8, 62.5%) reported values of PD-L1 expression ranging from > 1 to ⩽ 5%, with values close to the cut-off point (⩾ 1% or < 1%) being the greatest challenge.Most of the centers (6/8, 75%) tested material from both their own and other hospitals. In most centers, the evaluations were performed either on primary tumors or metastasis, in particular lymph nodes (5/8, 62.5%), followed by lung (3/8, 37.5%) and liver (1/8, 12.5%) metastasis., Conclusion: Our results raise some important issues concerning the evaluation of PD-L1 in the "real-life" setting, providing strategies for its implementation., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Paolo Marchetti (PM) has/had a consultant/advisory role for BMS, Roche- Genentech, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Incyte. The other authors declare they have no competing interests.

(1) Background: We estimated the prevalence and clinical outcomes of sarcopenia among breast cancer patients. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out for the period between July 2023 and October 2023. Studies with breast cancer patients evaluated for sarcopenia in relation to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse of disease (DFS), pathological complete response (pCR), or toxicity to chemotherapy were included. (3) Results: Out of 359 screened studies, 16 were eligible for meta-analysis, including 6130 patients, of whom 5284 with non-MBC. Sarcopenia was evaluated with the computed tomography (CT) scan skeletal muscle index and, in two studies, with the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) appendicular lean mass index. Using different classifications and cut-off points, overall, there were 2007 sarcopenic patients (33%), of whom 1901 (95%) presented with non-MBC. Sarcopenia was associated with a 33% and 29% higher risk of mortality and progression/relapse of disease, respectively. Sarcopenic patients were more likely to develop grade 3-4 toxicity (OR 3.58, 95% CI 2.11-6.06, p < 0.0001). In the neoadjuvant setting, a higher rate of pCR was observed among sarcopenic patients (49%) (OR 2.74, 95% CI 0.92-8.22). (4) Conclusions: Our meta-analysis confirms the correlation between sarcopenia and negative outcomes, especially in terms of higher toxicity.

The use of neoadjuvant or perioperative anti-PD(L)1 was recently tested in multiple clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant or perioperative chemoimmunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC. Nine reports from 6 studies were included. Receipt of surgery was more frequent in the experimental arm (odds ratio, OR 1.39) as was pCR (OR 7.60). EFS was improved in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, HR 0.55) regardless of stage, histology, PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 negative, HR 0.74) and smoking exposure (never smokers, HR 0.67), as was OS (HR 0.67). Grade > = 3 treatment-related adverse events were more frequent in the experimental arm (OR 1.22). The experimental treatment improved surgical outcomes, pCR rates, EFS and OS in stage II-IIIB, EGFR/ALK negative resectable NSCLC; confirmatory evidence is warranted for stage IIIB tumours and with higher maturity of the OS endpoint., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: DM: none. FTG: none. SP: none. MADC: none. AT: none. RG: none. AJG: none. MR: none. MV: none. EM: none. RT: none. FLC: none. LL: none. PN: none. NP: none. MO: sub-investigator in KEYNOTE-671. MB: none. PMF: consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo Company, F-Star, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Iteos, Janssen Global Services LLC, Merck, Novartis, SANOFI PASTEUR INC, Surface Oncology; grant/contract (to institution) from AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, LUNGevity Foundation, Mark Foundation, NCI Cancer Center Support Grant, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Stand Up To Cancer; gift (research funding) from Bloomberg Philantropies, Earl & Darielle Linehan, Martha Furman, Susan Troll. SVL: advisory board/consultant for Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalyst, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Elevation Oncology, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Guardant Health, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Merus, Mirati, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics; research grant (to institution) from Alkermes, Elevation Oncology, Genentech, Gilead, Merck, Merus, Nuvalent, RAPT, Turning Point Therapeutics; data safety monitoring board for Candel Therapeutics. AB: none. SN: consultant for Thermo Fisher Scientific; grant/contract (to institution) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene Switzerland GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, PFIZER CANADA INC, SANOFI PASTEUR INC, Takeda Oncology; speaker bureau from AstraZeneca, BeiGene Switzerland GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda Oncology. GC: none. EC: none. FF: none. FC: personal fees from Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, and Bayer. DS: Advisory Board role and speaker honoraria with Astra Zeneca, MSD, BMS, Astellas, Janssenn, EISAI, Merck, Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Lilly., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Metastatic breast cancer patients are the most prevalent oncology population with advanced disease facing COVID-19 pandemic. Immune responses after mRNA-based vaccination during treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors or HER2-directed agents remain unclear. We conducted a prospective analysis to elucidate changes in antibody titers and lymphocyte counts following full course of mRNA-BNT162b2 (tozinameran) vaccination in recipients undergoing these targeted therapies., Methods: Patients who had received a booster dosing and had been treated for at least 6 months were eligible. Antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured at four subsequent time points. Immunophenotyping of circulating lymphocytes was performed before the third dose of tozinameran and four weeks later to quantify the absolute counts of CD3 + CD4 + T-helper cells, CD3 + CD8 + T-cytotoxic cells, CD19 + B cells, and CD56 + CD16 + NK cells. We also assessed the incidence of breakthrough infections and investigated whether immune changes affect time-to-treatment failure (TTF) after booster vaccination., Results: The current analysis included 69 patients, of whom 38 (55%) and 31 (45%) were being treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors and HER2-targeted therapies, respectively. All participants received a third dose of tozinameran between September 23 and October 7, 2021. Multivariate analysis revealed that CDK4/6 inhibition predicted a significantly impaired humoral response after the booster dose. This detrimental effect was also evident for T-helper cell counts before the third immunization, but it disappeared in the subsequent evaluation. After a median follow-up of 22.3 months, we observed 19 (26%) cases of COVID-19 outbreaks, all experiencing favorable clinical outcomes. Univariate analysis showed a significant association between the onset of SARS-CoV-2 infections and the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, as well as with an impaired antibody and T-helper cell response. Only the last two covariates remained independent predictors after multivariate testing. Dynamic variations in antibody titers and T-helper cell counts did not affect TTF in multivariate regression analysis., Conclusions: Our results confirm that the immune response to tozinameran is impaired by CDK4/6 inhibitors, increasing the odds of breakthrough infections despite the third vaccine dose. Current evidence recommends maintaining efforts to provide booster immunizations to the most vulnerable cancer patients, including those with advanced breast cancer undergoing CDK4/6 inhibition., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2023 Nelli, Fabbri, Botticelli, Giannarelli, Marrucci, Fiore, Virtuoso, Berrios, Scagnoli, Pisegna, Cirillo, Panichi, Massari, Silvestri and Ruggeri.)

The therapeutic scenario of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been recently enriched by a number of innovative agents, which are reshaping treatment sequence. While randomized trials have documented an advantage in terms of efficacy, for the newly available agents we lack effectiveness and tolerability evidence from the real-world setting. Similarly, the identification of predictive biomarkers might improve clinical decision. We herein describe the outline of a prospective/retrospective study which aims to explore the optimal sequence of treatment in HER2+, pertuzumab pre-treated ABC patients treated in II line with anti-HER2 agents in clinical practice. As part of the pre-clinical tasks envisioned by the STEP study, in vitro cell models of resistance were exploited to investigate molecular features associated with reduced efficacy of HER2 targeting agents at the transcript level. The aggressive behavior of resistant cell populations was measured by growth assessment in mouse models. This approach led to the identification of DARPP-32 and t-DARPP proteins as possible predictive biomarkers of efficacy of anti-HER2 agents. Biomarkers validation and the clinical goals will be reached through patients' inclusion into two independent cohorts, i.e., the prospective and retrospective cohorts, whose setup is currently ongoing., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: FSDL: Ipsen and Novartis, outside the submitted work. AB: Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Msd, Seagen, Gilead and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work. DS: Amgen, Astellas, Astrazeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, outside the submitted work. GDA: Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. CM: Bayer, Roche, AstraZeneca and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work. P.V.: Pfizer, Novartis, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo and Eli Lilly, outside of the manuscript under consideration L.P.: Novartis and Pfizer, outside of the manuscript under consideration. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed for other authors, (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Up to 20% of breast cancer overexpress HER2 protein, making it a reliable target for antibody-based treatments. In early HER2-positive breast cancer avoiding anthracycline-based chemotherapy is a challenge. Based on the single-arm phase II APT trial results, adjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab is an accepted regimen for patients with stage I HER2-positive disease. In our retrospective study of 240 patients, the median tumor size was 12.0 mm (IQR 9 -15), and 204 (85%) had estrogen receptor-positive disease. After a median follow-up of 4.6 years, 3-year real-world disease-free survival, distant DFS, and overall survival were 98.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 96.2-99.6), 99.2% (95% CI, 96.7-99.8), and 98.3% (95% CI, 96.2-99.6), respectively. In a real-world setting, an adjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab regimen was associated with low recurrence rates among women with stage I, HER2-positive breast cancer. Additionally, we reviewed other treatment optimization strategies attempted or ongoing in HER2-positive breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest VD, MS, FJ, MM, MP, IS, WH: none. GNM: Travel grants for meetings from Roche and Bayer, outside the submitted work. EA: Speaking fee/consultancy: Eli Lilly, Sandoz, AstraZeneca. Support to attend medical conferences from Eli Lilly, Roche, Novartis, Genetics, Istituto Gentili, Daiichi Sankyo (all outside the present work). CM: receive fees from Novartis and Lilly outside the submitted work.Ugo De Giorgi received honoraria for advisory boards or speaker fees for Pfizer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Clovis, GSK, AstraZeneca, Institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Roche all outside the submitted work. UDG: Advisory boards: Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche; Institutional research grant: AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi. AS: Advisory Board: BMS (BRISTOL-MYERS-SQUIBB), Servier,Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD (MERCK SHARP & DOHME); Consultancy: Arqule, Sanofi, Incyte; Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda, BMS, Roche, Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Servier, Gilead, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Arqule, Lilly, Sandoz, Eisai, Novartis, Bayer, MSD. DT: advisory board: Agendia, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Travel: AstraZeneca,Pfizer, Roche. FPD: Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sceince, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seagen; Contracted Research: Fondation belge contre le cancer; Institutional grant: AstraZeneca. AB: Advisory board: Argen, BMS, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. GB: Advisory board: BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Travel: BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. ML: reports advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD and Exact Sciences; speaker honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Libbs, Daiichi Sankyo and Takeda; Travel Grants from Gilead; Research funding (to the Institution) from Gilead outside the submitted work. EdA: Honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, SeaGen, Zodiac, Libbs, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Astra-Zeneca; travel grants from Roche/GNE and Astra-Zeneca; Research grant to my institution from Roche/GNE, AstraZeneca, and GSK/Novartis. MP: Board Member (Scientific Board): Oncolytics; Consultant (honoraria): AstraZeneca, Camel-IDS/Precirix, Gilead, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Immutep, Seagen, NBE Therapeutics, Frame Therapeutics; Research grants to my Institute: AstraZeneca, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Radius, Roche-Genentech, Servier, Synthon., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: BRAF and MEK inhibition is a successful strategy in managing BRAF-mutant melanoma, even if the treatment-related toxicity is substantial. We analyzed the role of drug-drug interactions (DDI) on the toxicity profile of anti-BRAF/anti-MEK therapy., Methods: In this multicenter, observational, and retrospective study, DDIs were assessed using Drug-PIN software (V 2/23). The association between the Drug-PIN continuous score or the Drug-PIN traffic light and the occurrence of treatment-related toxicities and oncological outcomes was evaluated., Results: In total, 177 patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma undergoing BRAF/MEK targeted therapy were included. All grade toxicity was registered in 79% of patients. Cardiovascular toxicities occurred in 31 patients (17.5%). Further, 94 (55.9%) patients had comorbidities requiring specific pharmacological treatments. The median Drug-PIN score significantly increased when the target combination was added to the patient's home therapy ( p -value < 0.0001). Cardiovascular toxicity was significantly associated with the Drug-PIN score ( p -value = 0.048). The Drug-PIN traffic light ( p = 0.00821) and the Drug-PIN score ( p = 0.0291) were seen to be significant predictors of cardiotoxicity. Patients with low-grade vs. high-grade interactions showed a better prognosis regarding overall survival (OS) ( p = 0.0045) and progression-free survival (PFS) ( p = 0.012). The survival analysis of the subgroup of patients with cardiological toxicity demonstrated that patients with low-grade vs. high-grade DDIs had better outcomes in terms of OS ( p = 0.0012) and a trend toward significance in PFS ( p = 0.068)., Conclusions: DDIs emerged as a critical issue for the risk of treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity. Our findings support the utility of DDI assessment in melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

The combination of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel is recommended in the EU as first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), based on the results of phase III IMpassion130 trial. However, 'real-world' data on this combination are limited. The ANASTASE study (NCT05609903) collected data on atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in PD-L1-positive mTNBC patients enrolled in the Italian Compassionate Use Program. A retrospective analysis was conducted in 29 Italian oncology centers among patients who completed at least one cycle of treatment. Data from 52 patients were gathered. Among them, 21.1% presented de novo stage IV; 78.8% previously received (neo)adjuvant treatment; 55.8% patients had only one site of metastasis; median number of treatment cycles was five (IQR: 3-8); objective response rate was 42.3% (95% CI: 28.9-55.7%). The median time-to-treatment discontinuation was 5 months (95% CI: 2.8-7.1); clinical benefit at 12 months was 45.8%. The median duration of response was 12.7 months (95% CI: 4.1-21.4). At a median follow-up of 20 months, the median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.9-8.7) and the median time to next treatment or death was 8.1 months (95% CI: 5.5-10.7). At 12 months and 24 months, the overall survival rates were 66.3% and 49.1%, respectively. The most common immune-related adverse events included rash (23.1%), hepatitis (11.5%), thyroiditis (11.5%) and pneumonia (9.6%). Within the ANASTASE study, patients with PD-L1-positive mTNBC treated with first-line atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel achieved PFS and ORR similar to those reported in the IMpassion130 study, with no unexpected adverse events., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have sculpted the current landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment. With the advent of targeted maintenance therapies, improved survival rates have led to a timely interest in exploring de-intensified strategies with the goal of improving quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. The emerging concept of systemic treatment de-escalation would represent a new frontier in personalizing therapy in ovarian cancer. PARPi are so effective that properly selected patients treated with these agents might require less chemotherapy to achieve the same oncologic outcomes. The fundamental key is to limit de-escalation to a narrow subpopulation with favorable prognostic factors, such as patients with BRCA -mutated and/or homologous recombination-deficient tumors without macroscopic residual disease after surgery or other high-risk clinical factors. Potential de-escalation strategies include shifting PARPi in the neoadjuvant setting, de-escalating adjuvant chemotherapy after primary debulking surgery, reducing PARPi maintenance therapy duration, starting PARPi directly after interval debulking surgery, omitting maintenance therapy, and continuing PARPi beyond oligoprogression (if combined with locoregional treatment). Several ongoing trials are currently investigating the feasibility and safety of de-escalating approaches in ovarian cancer and the results are eagerly awaited. This review aims to discuss the current trends, drawbacks, and future perspectives regarding systemic treatment de-escalation in advanced ovarian cancer., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RLC: Leadership: Onxeo; Stock and Other Ownership Interests: McKesson; Consulting or Advisory Role: Clovis Oncology, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Genmab, Tesaro, OncoMed, Sotio, Oncolytics, AbbVie/Stemcentrx, ImmunoGen, AbbVie, Agenus, Novocure, Merck, OncXerna Therapeutics, Alkermes, Gradalis, Regeneron; Research Funding: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Esperance Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma, Clovis Oncology, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Abbott/AbbVie, ImmunoGen (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Regeneron (Inst); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Array BioPharma, Clovis Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Research to Practice, GOG Foundation, Sotio, Vaniam Group. NC reports fees for advisory board membership for AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, Immunogen, Mersana, MSD/Merck, Nuvation Bio, Onxerna, Pfizer, Pieris, Roche; fees as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Clovis Oncology, GSK, MSD/Merck; institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, and Roche. She has also reported non-remunerated activities as a member of the ESMO Guidelines Steering Committee and chair of the Scientific Committee of ACTO (Alleanza Contro il Tumore Ovarico). All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Metastasis is the main cause of breast cancer (BC) mortality. Increasing evidence points to a role of syndecan-1 (CD138) expression as a prognostic marker involved in BC tissue and leptomeningeal metastasis. Aim of this study was to investigate and compare syndecan-1 tissue expression and localization in primary and secondary BC, focusing on brain metastases., Methods: Syndecan-1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Focal vs diffuse (< or > 50% of cancer cells, respectively) pattern of expression, cellular localization (cytoplasm vs membrane) and intensity of immunostaining on neoplastic cells were evaluated. Moreover, the extent and pattern of expression of syndecan-1 were compared between primary tumors and paired metastases and correlated with the tumor intrinsic subtype., Results: A total of 23 cases, 10 with paired primary and metastatic tumor and 13 brain metastases, were evaluated. Syndecan-1 was expressed in both primary and metastatic BC. A diffuse cytoplasmic expression was observed in most primary BCs; by contrast, all metastatic lesions showed a membrane pattern of expression, suggesting a shift in cellular localization of syndecan-1 during the metastatic process. Concerning the extent of expression, we observed in metastatic lesions, a trend of association between intrinsic subtypes and extent of positivity. In particular, both BC characterized by overexpression of HER2 and triple-negative tumors were correlated with a diffuse pattern of expression with a moderate to strong intensity., Conclusion: A diffuse cytoplasmic expression was observed in most primary BCs; by contrast, all metastatic lesions showed a membrane pattern of expression, suggesting a shift in cellular localization of syndecan-1 during the metastatic process., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Tissue-based biopsy is the present main tool to explore the molecular landscape of cancer, but it also has many limits to be frequently executed, being too invasive with the risk of side effects. These limits and the ability of cancer to constantly evolve its genomic profile, have recently led to the need of a less invasive and more accurate alternative, such as liquid biopsy. By searching Circulating Tumor Cells and residues of their nucleic acids or other tumor products in body fluids, especially in blood, but also in urine, stools and saliva, liquid biopsy is becoming the future of clinical oncology. Despite the current lack of a standardization for its workflows, that makes it hard to be reproduced, liquid biopsy has already obtained promising results for cancer screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and risk of recurrence.Through a more accessible molecular profiling of tumors, it could become easier to identify biomarkers predictive of response to treatment, such as EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer, or Microsatellite Instability and Mismatch Repair as predictive markers of pembrolizumab response.By monitoring circulating tumor DNA in longitudinal repeated sampling of blood we could also predict Minimal Residual Disease and the risk of recurrence in already radically resected patients.In this review we will discuss about the current knowledge of limitations and strengths of the different forms of liquid biopsies for its inclusion in normal cancer management, with a brief nod to their newest biomarkers and its future implications., (© 2023. Italian National Cancer Institute ‘Regina Elena’.)

Purpose: No evidence exists as to whether type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) impairs clinical outcome from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with solid tumors., Experimental Design: In a large cohort of ICI recipients treated at 21 institutions from June 2014 to June 2020, we studied whether patients on glucose-lowering medications (GLM) for T2DM had shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We used targeted transcriptomics in a subset of patients to explore differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of patients with or without diabetes., Results: A total of 1,395 patients were included. Primary tumors included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 54.7%), melanoma (24.7%), renal cell (15.0%), and other carcinomas (5.6%). After multivariable analysis, patients on GLM (n = 226, 16.2%) displayed an increased risk of death [HR, 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI),1.07-1.56] and disease progression/death (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43) independent of number of GLM received. We matched 92 metformin-exposed patients with 363 controls and 78 patients on other oral GLM or insulin with 299 control patients. Exposure to metformin, but not other GLM, was associated with an increased risk of death (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16-2.03) and disease progression/death (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72). Patients with T2DM with higher pretreatment glycemia had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.04), while exploratory tumoral transcriptomic profiling in a subset of patients (n = 22) revealed differential regulation of innate and adaptive immune pathways in patients with T2DM., Conclusions: In this study, patients on GLM experienced worse outcomes from immunotherapy, independent of baseline features. Prospective studies are warranted to clarify the relative impact of metformin over a preexisting diagnosis of T2DM in influencing poorer outcomes in this population., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: The immune profile of each patient could be considered as a portrait of the fitness of his/her own immune system. The predictive role of the immune profile in immune-related toxicities (irAEs) development and tumour response to treatment was investigated., Methods: A prospective, multicenter study evaluating, through a multiplex assay, the soluble immune profile at the baseline of 53 patients with advanced cancer, treated with immunotherapy as single agent was performed. Four connectivity heat maps and networks were obtained by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficients for each group: responder patients who developed cumulative toxicity (R-T), responders who did not develop cumulative toxicity (R-NT), non-responders who developed cumulative toxicity (NR-T), non-responders who did not develop cumulative toxicity (NR-NT)., Results: A statistically significant up-regulation of IL-17A, sCTLA4, sCD80, I-CAM-1, sP-Selectin and sEselectin in NR-T was detected. A clear loss of connectivity of most of the soluble immune checkpoints and cytokines characterized the immune profile of patients with toxicity, while an inversion of the correlation for ICAM-1 and sP-selectin was observed in NR-T. Four connectivity networks were built for each group. The highest number of connections characterized the NR-T., Conclusions: A connectivity network of immune dysregulation was defined for each subgroup of patients, regardless of tumor type. In patients with the worst prognosis (NR-T) the peculiar connectivity model could facilitate their early and timely identification, as well as the design of a personalized treatment approach to improve outcomes or prevent irAEs., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Mezi, Pomati, Fiscon, Amirhassankhani, Zizzari, Napoletano, Rughetti, Rossi, Schinzari, Tortora, Lanzetta, D’Amati, Nuti, Santini and Botticelli.)

Background: Real-life spectrum and survival implications of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with extended interval dosing (ED) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unknown., Methods: Characteristics of 812 consecutive solid cancer patients who received at least 1 cycle of ED monotherapy (pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W or nivolumab 480 mg Q4W) after switching from canonical interval dosing (CD; pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or nivolumab 240 mg Q2W) or treated upfront with ED were retrieved. The primary objective was to compare irAEs patterns within the same population (before and after switch to ED). irAEs spectrum in patients treated upfront with ED and association between irAEs and overall survival were also described., Results: A total of 550 (68%) patients started ICIs with CD and switched to ED. During CD, 225 (41%) patients developed any grade and 17 (3%) G3 or G4 irAEs; after switching to ED, any grade and G3 or G4 irAEs were experienced by 155 (36%) and 20 (5%) patients. Switching to ED was associated with a lower probability of any grade irAEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.99; P = .047), whereas no difference for G3 or G4 events was noted (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.81 to 2.94; P = .18). Among patients who started upfront with ED (n = 232, 32%), 107 (41%) developed any grade and 14 (5%) G3 or G4 irAEs during ED. Patients with irAEs during ED had improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.82; P = .004 after switching; aHR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.93; P = .025 upfront)., Conclusions: Switching ICI treatment from CD and ED did not increase the incidence of irAEs and represents a safe option also outside clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

The three current oncology models (histological, agnostic and mutational) mainly differ in clinical, technological and organisational aspects, leading to different regulatory procedures and implications in antineoplastic therapy access by patients. Within the histological and agnostic models, Regulatory Agencies authorise target therapies and define their price, reimbursement, prescription and access based on results from clinical trials including patients affected by the same tumour (histological) or subjects with specific genetic mutations regardless of the tumour site or the histology (agnostic). The mutational model has been developed to identify specific actionable molecular alterations found by next-generation sequencing test-based large platforms on solid and liquid biopsies. Nevertheless, due to the highly uncertain efficacy and possible toxicity of drugs tested within this model, regulatory procedures based on histological or agnostic oncology cannot be followed. Multidisciplinary skills are required (e.g. the molecular tumour board's (MTB) representatives) to identify the best association between the genomic profile and the drug planned to be used, but quality requirements, practices and procedures of these discussions still need to be standardised. Real-world evidence from clinical practice (i.e. genomic findings, clinical data and MTBs' choices) lacks, therefore, it is urgently needed as opposed to limited findings from clinical trials. A potential solution for an appropriate access to the therapy chosen by the mutational model can be the indication-value-based sub iudice procedure of authorisation. The access to therapies suggested by extensive molecular profiling could be easily implementable within the Italian national health system, thanks to the existing regulatory procedures, i.e. the managed-entry agreements and the antineoplastic drug monitoring registries, alongside those granted by conventional studies (phase I, II, III, IV) conducted according to the histological and agnostic models., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: PM declares grants to his Institution from Roche, BMS, Pfizer, Incyte, Novartis, Takeda, MSD, Pierre Fabre; Personal payments from Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre; Personal support for congress attendance from BMS, Roche; is President of the Italian Foundation of Personalized Medicine, of AIOM Servizi s.r.l., of the Steering and Verification Board of the 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute. GC declares grants from Merck; consulting fees from BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Merck, Seagen, Ellipsis, Gilead; payment for lectures from Lilly, Pfizer, Relay; support for attending meetings from Daichii Sankyo. AB declares grants, consulting fees and payment for lectures from BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Msd, Seagen, Gilead; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Msd, Seagen, Gilead. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

KRAS G12C mutations are found in about 12-13% of LUAD samples and it is unclear whether they are associated with worse survival outcomes in resected, stage I LUAD. We assessed whether KRAS-G12C mutated tumours had worse DFS when compared to KRAS-nonG12C mutated tumours and to KRAS wild-type tumours in a cohort of resected, stage I LUAD (IRE cohort). We then leveraged on publicly available datasets (TCGA-LUAD, MSK-LUAD 604 ) to further test the hypothesis in external cohorts. In the stage I IRE cohort we found a significant association between the KRAS-G12C mutation and worse DFS in multivariable analysis (HR: 2.47). In the TCGA-LUAD stage I cohort we did not find statistically significant associations between the KRAS-G12C mutation and DFS. In the MSK-LUAD 604 stage I cohort we found that KRAS-G12C mutated tumours had worse RFS when compared to KRAS-nonG12C mutated tumours in univariable analysis (HR 3.5). In the pooled stage I cohort we found that KRAS-G12C mutated tumours had worse DFS when compared to KRAS-nonG12C mutated tumours (HR 2.6), to KRAS wild-type tumours (HR 1.6) and to any other tumours (HR 1.8); in multivariable analysis, the KRAS-G12C mutation was associated with worse DFS (HR 1.61). Our results suggest that patients with resected, stage I LUAD with a KRAS-G12C mutation may have inferior survival outcomes.., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have particular, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), as a consequence of interfering with self-tolerance mechanisms. The incidence of irAEs varies depending on ICI class, administered dose and treatment schedule. The aim of this study was to define a baseline (T0) immune profile (IP) predictive of irAE development., Methods: A prospective, multicenter study evaluating the immune profile (IP) of 79 patients with advanced cancer and treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) drugs as a first- or second-line setting was performed. The results were then correlated with irAEs onset. The IP was studied by means of multiplex assay, evaluating circulating concentration of 12 cytokines, 5 chemokines, 13 soluble immune checkpoints and 3 adhesion molecules. Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) activity was measured through a modified liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using the high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. A connectivity heatmap was obtained by calculating Spearman correlation coefficients. Two different networks of connectivity were constructed, based on the toxicity profile., Results: Toxicity was predominantly of low/moderate grade. High-grade irAEs were relatively rare, while cumulative toxicity was high (35%). Positive and statistically significant correlations between the cumulative toxicity and IP10 and IL8, sLAG3, sPD-L2, sHVEM, sCD137, sCD27 and sICAM-1 serum concentration were found. Moreover, patients who experienced irAEs had a markedly different connectivity pattern, characterized by disruption of most of the paired connections between cytokines, chemokines and connections of sCD137, sCD27 and sCD28, while sPDL-2 pair-wise connectivity values seemed to be intensified. Network connectivity analysis identified a total of 187 statistically significant interactions in patients without toxicity and a total of 126 statistically significant interactions in patients with toxicity. Ninety-eight interactions were common to both networks, while 29 were specifically observed in patients who experienced toxicity., Conclusions: A particular, common pattern of immune dysregulation was defined in patients developing irAEs. This immune serological profile, if confirmed in a larger patient population, could lead to the design of a personalized therapeutic strategy in order to prevent, monitor and treat irAEs at an early stage., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Clinical trials have shown a significant increase in pathologic complete response (pCR) with the addition of pertuzumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early-stage HER-2 positive breast cancer. To date, limited studies have examined comparative outcomes of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in real-world setting. The Neopearl study aimed to assess comparative real-life efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab for these patients., Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective analysis involving 17 oncology facilities with a certified multidisciplinary breast cancer treatment committee. We identified patients with HER-2 positive stage II-III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on trastuzumab and taxanes with or without pertuzumab. All patients underwent breast surgery and received a comprehensive cardiologic evaluation at baseline and after neoadjuvant treatment. Patients who received the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy constituted case cohort (PTCT), whereas those treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy accounted for control cohort (TCT). The pCR rate and 5-year event free survival (EFS) were the primary outcomes. Secondary end-points were rates of conversion from planned modified radical mastectomy (MRM) to breast conservation surgery (BCS) and cardiotoxicities., Results: From March 2014 to April 2021, we included 271 patients, 134 (49%) and 137 (51%) in TCT and PTCT cohort, respectively. Positive axillary lymph nodes and stage III were more frequent in PTCT cohort. The pCR rate was significantly increased in patients who received pertuzumab (49% vs 62%; OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.04-2.89) and with HER-2 enriched subtypes (16% vs 85%; OR 2.94, 95%CI 1.60-5.41). After a median follow-up of 5 years, the 5-year EFS was significantly prolonged only in patients treated with pertuzumab (81% vs 93%; HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.03-4.79). The same analysis performed on propensity score matched population showed concordant results. On univariate analysis, only patients with positive lymph nodes were found to benefit from pertuzumab for both pCR and 5-year EFS. The rates of conversion from MRM to BCS and cardiologic toxicities did not differ between the cohorts., Conclusion: Our findings support previous data on improved outcomes with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This benefit seems to be more significant in patients with clinically positive lymph nodes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Fabbri, Nelli, Botticelli, Giannarelli, Marrucci, Fiore, Virtuoso, Scagnoli, Pisegna, Alesini, Sini, Orlandi, Fabi, Piacentini, Moscetti, D’Auria, Gamucci, Mazzotta, Pizzuti, Vici, Cretella, Scavina, La Cesa, Persano, Atzori and Ruggeri.)

This study aims to retrospectively assess the potential risk of malignant transformation in patients with diagnosed oral lichen planus (OLP) between 2015 and 2022, and to evaluate the influence of different risk factors. The department's database and medical records from 2015 to 2022 were searched for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of OLP based on both clinical and histological parameters. A total of 100 patients (59 females and 41 males) were found with a mean age of 64.03 years. In the considered period, the percentage of diagnosed OLP patients was 1.6%, while the percentage of diagnosed OLP patients with transformation to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) was 0.18%. A statistically significant difference was found with age ( p = 0.038), tobacco status ( p = 0.022), and radiotherapy ( p = 0.041). The analysis revealed the presence of significant risk in ex-smokers (>20 pack-years), with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.0000 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5793-63.3186); in alcohol-drinker patients, with an OR of 4.0519 (95% CI 1.0182-16.1253); in ex-smoker and alcohol-drinker patients, with OR of 17.6250 (95% CI 2.2464-138.2808); and in patients who had undergone radiotherapy, with OR of 6.3000 (95% CI 1.2661-31.3484). The malignant transformation of oral lichen planus was slightly higher than thought, and the results revealed a possible association with age, tobacco and alcohol status, and history of radiotherapy. An elevated risk of malignant transformation was observed in heavy ex-smoker patients, alcohol-drinker patients, and alcohol-drinker patients with a history of smoking (ex-smokers). Persuading the patient to quit tobacco and alcohol consumption and periodic follow-ups are recommended in general, but particularly in the presence of these risk factors.

Background: In triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual disease at surgery is the most relevant unfavorable prognostic factor. Current guidelines consider the use of adjuvant capecitabine, based on the results of the randomized CREATE-X study, carried out in Asian patients and including a small subset of triple negative tumors. Thus far, evidence on Caucasian patients is limited, and no real-world data are available., Methods: We carried out a multicenter, observational study, involving 44 oncologic centres. Triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease, treated with adjuvant capecitabine from January 2017 through June 2021, were recruited. We primarily focused on treatment tolerability, with toxicity being reported as potential cause of treatment discontinuation. Secondarily, we assessed effectiveness in the overall study population and in a subset having a minimum follow-up of 2 years., Results: Overall, 270 patients were retrospectively identified. The 50.4% of the patients had residual node positive disease, 7.8% and 81.9% had large or G3 residual tumor, respectively, and 80.4% a Ki-67 >20%. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuation was observed only in 10.4% of the patients. In the whole population, at a median follow-up of 15 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 62%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 84.0% and 76.2%, respectively. In 129 patients with a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 43.4%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 78.0% and 70.8%, respectively. Six or more cycles of capecitabine were associated with more favourable outcomes compared with less than six cycles., Conclusion: The CaRe study shows an unexpectedly good tolerance of adjuvant capecitabine in a real-world setting, although effectiveness appears to be lower than that observed in the CREATE-X study. Methodological differences between the two studies impose significant limits to comparability concerning effectiveness, and strongly invite further research., Competing Interests: LP received speaker fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. UDG: Pfizer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMAR, AStellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Novartis; Invited speaker Roche, BMS, SAnofi, AstraZeneca; received research grants from AstraZeneca, SAnofi, Roche, outside the submitted work. AF received honoraria as a speaker from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, outside the submitted work. GT: advisory boards from Novartis, Pfizer, Eisai, Roche, and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. DS: advisory boards from Novartis, Pfizer, Eisai, Roche, and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. NLV: Roche, MSD, Eisai, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GSK, Pfizer, Gentili, Daiichi Sankyo, Dephaforum, outside the submitted work. OG: Eisai, MSD, Gilead, Seagen, Novartis, Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. IM: advisory boards from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Gentili, Roche, Pfizer, Ipsen, and Pierre-Fabre, outside the submitted work. GD’A: Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly outside the submitted work. TG received travel grants from Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, and Novartis; speaker fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili, and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. MPi Consultant/advisory boards from Gilead, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili, MSD, outside the submitted work. RB received research grant/advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, MSD, Otsuka, Eli Lilly, Roche, Amgen, GSK, Eisai, outside the submitted work. FGi: advisory boards from Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, Seagen, outside the submitted work. MEC consultant/advisory role for Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Celgene, outside the submitted work. RT: AstraZeneca, Eisai, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, MSD, Exact Science, outside the submitted work. AB: MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche outside the submitted work. AM received travel grants from Eisai, Celgene, and Novartis Ipsen; personal fees/advisory boards from Eisai, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Teva, Pfizer, and Celgene, outside the submitted work. IP received personal fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Italfarmaco, Gentili, and Pierre-Fabre. LG received congress travel accomodation from Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis; advisory role for Astra Zeneca outside the submitted work. MMin: Novartis, MSD, Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. LM received personal fees/advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Eisai, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. EC: Astellas, Roche, BMS, Jansen, MSD, Sirtex, Merck, Bayer, Servier, Novartis, outside the submitted work. PM has/had a consultant/advisory role for BMS, Roche, Genentech, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre and Incyte, outside the submitted work. PV received speaker fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Di Lisa, Krasniqi, Pizzuti, Barba, Cannita, De Giorgi, Borella, Foglietta, Cariello, Ferro, Picardo, Mitidieri, Sini, Stani, Tonini, Santini, La Verde, Gambaro, Grassadonia, Tinari, Garrone, Sarobba, Livi, Meattini, D’Auria, Vergati, Gamucci, Pistelli, Berardi, Risi, Giotta, Lorusso, Rinaldi, Artale, Cazzaniga, Zustovich, Cappuzzo, Landi, Torrisi, Scagnoli, Botticelli, Michelotti, Fratini, Saltarelli, Paris, Muratore, Cassano, Gianni, Gaspari, Veltri, Zoratto, Fiorio, Fabbri, Mazzotta, Ruggeri, Pedersini, Valerio, Filomeno, Minelli, Scavina, Raffaele, Astone, De Vita, Pozzi, Riccardi, Greco, Moscetti, Giordano, Maugeri-Saccà, Zennaro, Botti, Pelle, Cappelli, Cavicchi, Vizza, Sanguineti, Tomao, Cortesi, Marchetti, Tomao, Speranza, Sperduti, Ciliberto and Vici.)

Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, has been approved as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma ((R/M) HNSCC). However, only a minority of patients benefit from immunotherapy, which highlights the need to identify novel biomarkers to optimize treatment strategies. CD137 + T cells have been identified as tumour-specific T cells correlated with immunotherapy responses in several solid tumours. In this study, we investigated the role of circulating CD137 + T cells in (R/M) HNSCC patients undergoing pembrolizumab treatment. PBMCs obtained from 40 (R/M) HNSCC patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 were analysed at baseline via cytofluorimetry for the expression of CD137, and it was found that the percentage of CD3 + CD137 + cells is correlated with the clinical benefit rate (CBR), PFS, and OS. The results show that levels of circulating CD137 + T cells are significantly higher in responder patients than in non-responders ( p = 0.03). Moreover, patients with CD3 + CD137 + percentage ≥1.65% had prolonged OS ( p = 0.02) and PFS ( p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis, on a combination of biological and clinical parameters, showed that high levels of CD3 + CD137 + cells (≥1.65%) and performance status (PS) = 0 are independent prognostic factors of PFS (CD137 + T cells, p = 0.007; PS, p = 0.002) and OS (CD137 + T cells, p = 0.006; PS, p = 0.001). Our results suggest that levels of circulating CD137 + T cells could serve as biomarkers for predicting the response of (R/M) HNSCC patients to pembrolizumab treatment, thus contributing to the success of anti-cancer treatment.

The introduction of the so-called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) substantially changed the history of cancer therapy. On the other hand, they can induce the development of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (Rh-irAEs). In the scenario of a joint oncology/rheumatology outpatient clinic, we conducted a single-centre descriptive study to define from a laboratory, clinical and therapeutic point of view, rheumatic conditions developed during anti-PD1 treatment. The study included 32 patients (M/F 16/16, median age 69, IQR 16.5). According to the international classification criteria, eight patients could be classified as affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis, one by Psoriatic Arthritis, six by Polymyalgia Rheumatica, five by systemic connective tissue diseases (two systemic lupus erythematosus, two Sjögren's syndrome, one undifferentiated connective tissue disease). The remaining patients were diagnosed as having undifferentiated arthritis or inflammatory arthralgia. The median interval between ICIs starting and the onset of symptoms was 14 weeks (IQR 19.75). Moving to treatment, the longitudinal observation revealed that all RA, PsA and CTD patients required the introduction of treatment with DMARDs. In conclusion, the growing use of ICIs in a real-life setting confirmed the possible development of different rheumatological conditions, further emphasising the need for shared oncology/rheumatology management.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is commonly defined as a breast cancer occurring during pregnancy, throughout 1 year postpartum, or during lactation. Despite being a rare circumstance, PABC is one of the most common types of malignancies occurring during pregnancy and lactation, with growing incidence in developed countries, due both to decreasing age at onset of breast cancer and to increasing maternal age. Diagnosis and management of malignancy in the prenatal and postnatal settings are challenging for practitioners, as the structural and functional changes that the breast undergoes may be misleading for both the radiologist and the clinician. Furthermore, safety concerns for the mother and child, as well as psychological aspects in this unique and delicate condition, need to be constantly considered. In this comprehensive review, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of PABC (including surgery, chemotherapy and other systemic treatments, and radiotherapy) are presented and fully discussed, based on medical literature, current international clinical guidelines, and systematic practice.

Our understanding of the gut microbiota has significantly evolved over the last two decades. Advances in the analysis of the gut microbiome continues to reveal complex microbial communities and discoveries about their role in health and diseases, including cancer development, are continuously growing. In addition, research has demonstrated that the use of antibiotics can modulate the gut microbiota composition negatively and influence cancer treatment outcomes, suggesting that antibiotics should be avoided if possible. In this article, we review the role of the gut microbiota in the formation of GI cancers. We show that specific bacterial populations can positively or negatively affect cancer formation with specific attention given to gastric and colorectal cancer. We also review the role of microbial-targeted therapies on cancer treatment outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Blocking the Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated great efficacy in cancer immunotherapy treatment and remains the central modality of immune targeting. To support the rational and tailored use of these drugs, it is important to identify reliable biomarkers related to survival. The role of the soluble form of the PD-L1 (sPD-L1) as a prognostic biomarker related to survival in solid cancer patients treated with immunotherapy has not yet been consistently evaluated. A systematic literature search of original articles in PubMed, MEDLINE and Scopus was conducted. Studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) or Kaplan−Meier curves or individual patient data for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) associated with baseline levels of sPD-L1 in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy treatment were considered eligible. Twelve studies involving 1076 patients and different tumor types treated with immunotherapy were included in the analysis. High blood levels of sPD-L1 correlated with poorer OS and PFS in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy (HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.15, 1.93, p < 0.01, I2 = 77% for OS; HR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.20, 2.12, p < 0.01, I2 = 82% for PFS). A subgroup analysis highlighted that high levels of sPD-L1 were associated with worse survival in patients affected by NSCLC (HR = 1.81 95%CI: 1.09−3.00, p = 0.02, I2 = 83% for OS; HR = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.27−3.76, p < 0.01, I2 = 88% for PFS). An HR > 1 indicated that patients with low levels of sPD-L1 have the highest rates of OS/PFS. In this meta-analysis, we clarified the role of sPD-L1 in different solid cancers treated exclusively with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). sPD-L1 could represent a non-invasive biomarker that is easily dosable in the blood of patients. The pooled data from the selected studies showed that a high circulating concentration of sPD-L1 in cancer patients correlates with worse survival, suggesting that it may be a helpful prognostic biomarker for the selection of cancer patients before immunotherapy, thus improving the efficacy of ICIs and avoiding unnecessary treatment.

The aim of this study was to combine breast MRI-derived biomarkers with clinical-pathological parameters to identify patients who truly need an Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® (ODXRS) genomic assay, currently used to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer, with the ultimate goal of customizing therapeutic decisions while reducing healthcare costs. Patients who underwent a preoperative multiparametric MRI of the breast and ODXRS tumor profiling were retrospectively included in this study. Imaging sets were evaluated independently by two breast radiologists and classified according to the 2013 American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) lexicon. In a second step of the study, a combined oncologic and radiologic assessment based on clinical-pathological and radiological data was performed, in order to identify patients who may need adjuvant chemotherapy. Results were correlated with risk levels expressed by ODXRS, using the decision made on the basis of the ODXRS test as a gold standard. The χ2 test was used to evaluate associations between categorical variables, and significant ones were further investigated using logistic regression analyses. A total of 58 luminal-like, early-stage breast cancers were included. A positive correlation was found between ODXRS and tumor size (p = 0.003), staging (p = 0.001) and grading (p = 0.005), and between BI-RADS categories and ODXRS (p < 0.05 for both readers), the latter being confirmed at multivariate regression analysis. Moreover, BI-RADS categories proved to be positive predictors of the therapeutic decision taken after performing an ODXRS assay. A statistically significant association was also found between the therapeutic decision based on the ODXRS and the results of combined onco-radiologic assessment (p < 0.001). Our study suggests that there is a correlation between BI-RADS categories at MRI and ODXRS and that a combined onco-radiological assessment may predict the decision made on the basis of the results of ODXRS genomic test.

Background: Despite the efficacy of immunotherapy, only a small percentage of patients achieves a long-term benefit in terms of overall survival. The aim of this study was to define an immune profile predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)., Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, who underwent ICI treatment were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were collected at the baseline. Thirteen soluble immune checkpoints, 3 soluble adhesion molecules, 5 chemokines and 11 cytokines were analyzed. The results were associated with oncological outcomes., Results: Regardless of tumor type, patients with values of sTIM3, IFNα, IFNγ, IL1β, IL1α, IL12p70, MIP1β, IL13, sCD28, sGITR, sPDL1, IL10 and TNFα below the median had longer overall survival (p<0.05). By using cluster analysis and grouping the patients according to the trend of the molecules, two clusters were found. Cluster A had a significantly higher mean progression free survival (Cluster A=11.9 months vs Cluster B=3.5 months, p<0.01), a higher percentage of disease stability (Cluster A=34.5% vs. Cluster B=0%, p<0.05) and a lower percentage of disease progression (Cluster A=55.2% vs. Cluster B = 94.4%, p=0.04)., Conclusion: The combined evaluation of soluble molecules, rather than a single circulating factor, may be more suitable to represent the fitness of the immune system status in each patient and could allow to identify two different prognostic and predictive outcome profiles., Competing Interests: PM has/had a consultant/advisory role for BMS, Roche, Genentech, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, and Incyte. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Botticelli, Pomati, Cirillo, Scagnoli, Pisegna, Chiavassa, Rossi, Schinzari, Tortora, Di Pietro, Cerbelli, Di Filippo, Amirhassankhani, Scala, Zizzari, Cortesi, Tomao, Nuti, Mezi and Marchetti.)

Introduction: Only a minority of patients with platinum refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (PR/HNSCC) gain some lasting benefit from immunotherapy., Methods: The combined role of the comprehensive genomic (through the FoundationOne Cdx test) and immune profiles of 10 PR/HNSCC patients treated with the anti-PD-1 nivolumab was evaluated. The immune profiles were studied both at baseline and at the second cycle of immunotherapy, weighing 20 circulating cytokines/chemokines, adhesion molecules, and 14 soluble immune checkpoints dosed through a multiplex assay. A connectivity map was obtained by calculating the Spearman correlation between the expression profiles of circulating molecules., Results: Early progression occurred in five patients, each of them showing TP53 alteration and three of them showing a mutation/loss/amplification of genes involved in the cyclin-dependent kinase pathway. In addition, ERB2 amplification (1 patient), BRCA1 mutation (1 patient), and NOTCH1 genes alteration (3 patients) occurred. Five patients achieved either stable disease or partial response. Four of them carried mutations in PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathways. In the only two patients, with a long response to immunotherapy, the tumor mutational burden (TMB) was high. Moreover, a distinct signature, in terms of network connectivity of the circulating soluble molecules, characterizing responder and non-responder patients, was evidenced. Moreover, a strong negative and statistically significant ( p -value ≤ 0.05) correlation with alive status was evidenced for sE-selectin at T1., Conclusions: Our results highlighted the complexity and heterogeneity of HNSCCs, even though it was in a small cohort. Molecular and immune approaches, combined in a single profile, could represent a promising strategy, in the context of precision immunotherapy.

The Hippo pathway and its two key effectors, Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), are consistently altered in breast cancer. Pivotal regulators of cell metabolism such as the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Stearoyl-CoA-desaturase 1 (SCD1), and HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) are relevant modulators of TAZ/YAP activity. In this prospective study, we measured the tumor expression of TAZ, YAP, AMPK, SCD1, and HMGCR by immunohistochemistry in 65 Her2+ breast cancer patients who underwent trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the immunohistochemical expression of the Hippo pathway transducers and cell metabolism regulators on pathological complete response. Low expression of cytoplasmic TAZ, both alone and in the context of a composite signature identified by machine learning including also low nuclear levels of YAP and HMGCR and high cytoplasmic levels of SCD1, was a predictor of residual disease in the univariate logistic regression. This finding was not confirmed in the multivariate model including estrogen receptor > 70% and body mass index > 20. However, our findings were concordant with overall survival data from the TCGA cohort. Our results, possibly affected by the relatively small sample size of this study population, deserve further investigation in adequately sized, ad hoc prospective studies.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine cancer that usually affects the elderly and immunosuppressed in sun-exposed areas. Due to its rarity, it is frequently unrecognized, and its management is not standardized across medical centers, despite the more recent availability of immunotherapy, with avelumab as first-line treatment improving the prognosis even in advanced stages of disease. We conducted a purpose-designed survey of a selected sample of physicians working in the Lazio region, in Italy, to assess their awareness and knowledge of MCC as well as their perspective on assisted diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The Lazio region, and in particular Rome, is one of the most important academic and non- academic center in Italy dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer. A total of 368 doctors (including 100 general practitioners, 72 oncologists, 87 dermatologists, 59 surgeons, and 50 anatomopathologists) agreed to be part of this survey. Surgeons, oncologists, and dermatologists thought themselves significantly more updated on MCC than primary care physicians, but more than half of the interviewees are interested in CCM training courses and training with clearer and more standardized care pathways. Significant differences have been reported from survey participants in terms of multidisciplinary team set up for MCC management. The identification of specialized centers and the improvement of communication pathways among different specialties, as well as between patients and physicians, could be very beneficial in improving patients' journey modeling and starting a uniform diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for MCC patients in the new era of immunotherapies.