Search

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a very hypofractionated radiotherapy (>7.5Gy per fraction), and therefore is more likely to induce late toxicities than conventional normofractionated irradiations. The present study examines four frequent and potentially serious late toxicities: brain radionecrosis, radiation pneumonitis, radiation myelitis, and radiation-induced pelvic toxicities. The critical review focuses on the toxicity scales, the definition of the dose constrained volume, the dosimetric parameters, and the non-dosimetric risk factors. The most commonly used toxicity scales remain: RTOG/EORTC or common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). The definition of organ-at-risk volume requiring protection is often controversial, which limits the comparability of studies and the possibility of accurate dose constraints. Nevertheless, for the brain, whatever the indication (arteriovenous malformation, benign tumor, metastasis of solid tumors...), the association between the volume of brain receiving 12Gy (V12Gy) and the risk of cerebral radionecrosis is well established for both single and multi-fraction stereotactic irradiation. For the lung, the average dose received by both lungs and the V20 seem to correlate well with the risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis. For the spinal cord, the maximum dose is the most consensual parameter. Clinical trial protocols are useful for nonconsensual dose constraints. Non-dosimetric risk factors should be considered when validating the treatment plan., (Copyright © 2023 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate the educational impact on radiation oncology residents in training when introducing an automatic segmentation software in head and neck cancer patients regarding organs at risk (OARs) and prophylactic cervical lymph node level (LNL) volumes. Two cases treated by exclusive intensity-modulated radiotherapy were delineated by an expert radiation oncologist and were considered as reference. Then, these cases were delineated by residents divided into two groups: group 1 (control group), experienced residents delineating manually, group 2 (experimental group), young residents on their first rotation trained with automatic delineation, delineating manually first (M -) and then after using the automatic system (M +). The delineation accuracy was assessed using the Overlap Volume (OV). Regarding the OARs, mean OV was 0.62 (SD = 0.05) for group 1, 0.56 (SD = 0.04) for group 2 M - , and 0.61 (SD = 0.03) for group 2 M + . Mean OV was higher in group 1 compared to group 2 M - (p = 0.01). There was no OV difference between group 1 and group 2 M + (p = 0.67). Mean OV was higher in the group 2 M + compared to group 2 M - (p < 0.003). Regarding LNL, mean OV was 0.53 (SD = 0.06) in group 1, 0.54 (SD = 0.03) in group 2 M - , and 0.58 (SD = 0.04) in group 2 M + . Mean OV was higher in group 2 M + for 11 of the 12 analysed structures compared to group 2 M - (p = 0.016). Prior use of the automatic delineation software reduced the average contouring time per case by 34 to 40%. Prior use of atlas-based automatic segmentation reduces the delineation duration, and provides reliable OARs and LNL delineations., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors. Currently, the use of radiation therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer is subject to discussion. In the adjuvant setting, the standard treatment is six months of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracile, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Chemoradiation may improve the survival of patients with incompletely resected tumours (R1). This remains to be confirmed by a prospective trial. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a promising treatment especially for patients with borderline resectable tumours. For patients with locally advanced tumours, there is no standard. An induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for non progressive patients reduces the rate of local relapse. Whereas in the first trials of chemoradiation large fields were used, the treated volumes have been reduced to improve tolerance. Tumour movements induced by breathing should be taken in account. Intensity modulated radiation therapy allows a reduction of doses to the organs at risk. Whereas widely used, this technique has poor evidence-based recommendation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is also being studied, as a neoadjuvant or exclusive treatment., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study is to correlate locoregional relapse with radiation therapy volumes in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 02 trial., Patients and Methods: We identified patients who had a locoregional relapse included in ACCORD 12's database. We studied their clinical, radiological, and dosimetric data to analyze the dose received by the area of relapse., Results: 39 patients (6.5%) presented 54 locoregional relapses. Most of the relapses were in-field (n = 21, 39%) or marginal (n = 13, 24%) with only six out-of-field (11%), 14 could not be evaluated. Most of them happened in the anastomosis, the perirectal space, and the usual lymphatic drainage areas (presacral and posterior lateral lymph nodes). Only patients treated for a lower rectum adenocarcinoma had a relapse outside of the treated volume. 2 patients with T4 tumors extending into anterior pelvic organs had relapses in anterior lateral and external iliac lymph nodes., Conclusions: Lowering the upper limit of the treatment field for low rectal tumors increased the risk of out of the field recurrence. For very low tumors, including the inguinal lymph nodes in the treated volume should be considered. Recording locoregional involvement, treated volumes, and relapse areas in future prospective trials would be of paramount interest to refine delineation guidelines., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Adjuvant whole-pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) improves locoregional control for high-intermediate stages I-III endometrial cancer patients. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) tends to replace the standard 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) technique used in trials. Material and methods: Consecutive patients with stages I-IIIc endometrial cancer treated between 2008 and 2014 in our department with post-operative 3DCRT or IMRT WPRT were studied retrospectively. Patients with cervical involvement underwent additional low-dose rate vaginal brachytherapy. The impact of the WPRT technique on local control, tolerance, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. Clinicians evaluated routinely acute radiation toxicity each week during radiation therapy and late toxicity during standard follow-up consultations. Results: Median follow-up was 50 months (range: 6-158). Among the 83 patients included, 47 were treated with 3DCRT and 36 with IMRT. There was no difference in patient characteristics between groups. The 5-year locoregional control and DFS rates were 94.5% and 68%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 3DCRT and IMRT groups in terms of survival, with 5-year OS rates of 74.6% and 78%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age over 68, stage > T1 and grade 3 were independently associated with shorter DFS and OS. Seven patients (8.4%) had grades 3-4 acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity with five patients (10.6%) and two (5.4%) in the 3DCRT and IMRT groups, respectively ( p  = .69). One case (1.2%) of late grade 3 GI toxicity was observed treated in 3DCRT. Conclusions: IMRT seems to be a safe technique for the treatment of endometrial cancer with a trend towards decreased acute GI toxicities. Results of the phase 3 RTOG 1203 trial are needed to confirm these results.

Currently, the use of radiation therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer is subject to discussion. In adjuvant setting, the standard treatment is 6 months of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine. Chemoradiation (CRT) may improve the survival of patients with incompletely resected tumors (R1). This should be confirmed by a prospective trial. Neoadjuvant CRT is a promising treatment especially for patients with borderline resectable tumors. For patients with locally advanced tumors, there is no a standard. An induction chemotherapy followed by CRT for non-progressive patients reduces the rate of local relapse. Whereas in the first trials of CRT large fields were used, the treated volumes have been reduced to improve tolerance. Tumor movements induced by breathing should be taken in account. Intensity modulated radiation therapy allows a reduction of doses to the organs at risk. Whereas widely used, this technique is not recommended., (Copyright © 2016 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

About 7200 new cases of pancreatic adenocarcinomas are diagnosed each year in France. At the time of diagnosis, an efficient carcinologic surgery will not be possible for nearly 80% of patients, in relation to loco-regional extension or metastatic dissemination. After surgical resection, the median survival of resected patients ranges from 12 to 20 months, with a high rate of relapses. Currently, the use of radiotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer is controversial. In adjuvant setting, the standard treatment is six months of chemotherapy with FUFOL or gemcitabine. Chemoradiation (CRT) may improve the survival of patients with incompletely resected tumors (R1). This must be validated in a prospective trial. Neoadjuvant CRT is a promising treatment but always under evaluation. For the treatment of patients with locally advanced tumors, there is not a standart treatment. A strategy of initial chemotherapy followed by CRT for non progressive patients is under evaluation. Whereas in the first trials of CRT large fields were used, the current trend is to reduce the treated volumes to improve tolerance. The delineation of target volumes has been improved by the use of simulation CT. The aims of this work are to precise the radio-anatomical particularities, the pattern of spread of pancreatic cancer and the principles of 3D conformal radiotherapy illustrated with a clinical case., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: A survey of the literature has been performed to find arguments in order to help the choice between radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases., Patients and Methods: A comparison of two groups of brain metastases treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery, with or without WBRT was performed. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: there were eight series including 448 patients published from 2000 to 2009; treated with 5-6 MV X-Rays, non invasive head immobilization, a margin 2 to 10mm; 24 to 40Gy in three to five fractions; a 5 to 8 days duration in six series and 15-16 days in two other series. WBRT (30%) ; radiosurgery: there were 12 series (1994 to 2005) including 2157 patients; an invasive head immobilization, no margin; doses from 10 to 25 Gy; six series over 12 had Gamma Knife radiosurgery and six had Linacs X-Rays. WBRT (30 Gy/10 F/12 days) associated to radiosurgery in several series. The following parameters were compared: median GTV, median survival, 1-year survival rate, local control rate, necrosis and WBRT rates., Results: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy series: the parameters were respectively: 0,52-4,47 cm(3) (median 2,8 cm(3)); 5-16 months (median 8,7 months); 68,2-93% (median 82,5%); necrosis rate 3,1%; associated WBRT 30%. Radiosurgery series: the parameters were respectively: 1,3 to 5,5 cm(3) (median 2 cm(3)); 5,5 to 22 months (median 11 months); 71 to 95% (median 85%); 0,5 to 6% (median 2,4%); associated WBRT 58%. Results seem similar in the two groups: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with non invasive immobilization could theoretically treat all brain metastases sizes except lesions<10 mm (500 mm(3)). In large volumes,>4200 mm(3) GTV, the toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was not reported, thus it was difficult to compare its results with the published reports of radiosurgery toxicity. WBRT was a confusing parameter. Obviously, this initial survey has important limitations, specifically its methodology., Conclusion: Radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy could be used to treat brain metastases with GTV>500 mm(3) and < or = 4200 mm(3) (Ø 20mm); for GTV<500 mm(3) (Ø 10mm) an invasive procedure with radiosurgery is necessary. For GTV>4200 mm(3) (Ø 20mm), hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy could be proposed, provided further studies, using 4 to 6 Gy fractions, a duration less or equal to 10-12 days and a margin of 2mm will be performed., (Copyright (c) 2009 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The work presented herein rests on the study of the Varian EPID aS500-II and the Image Acquisition system IAS3. We assessed the dosimetric performance of this EPID for measurements and quality assurance of enhanced dynamic wedge profiles and wedge factors., Materials and Methods: We evaluated the dosimeter properties using the integrated asynchronous mode of acquisition in treatments with enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW). We studied the performance, stability and the reproducibility in measurements of the transmission factors and profiles of the fields with dynamic wedges. EPID profiles were compared to the "Profiler Sun Nuclear" diode array and PTW ion chamber. Analytical functions were developed in order to correct EDW profiles. The dependence of EPID measurements on wedge direction, beam dimensions and source to EPID distance was assessed., Results: The backscatter produced by the "exact arm" was evaluated; EPID profiles depended on the EDW direction and on the detector source distance. Wedge factors were determined using this detector and compared to the ion chamber response, differences were all within 1 %. Two empirical correction functions were developed to produce EPID wedge profiles that correspond to diode for all wedge angles and energies depending on the wedge direction., Conclusion: The EPID is highly suited to regular measurement of EDW due to the reproducibility of the EPID-measured wedge factors and profiles.

Introduction: This paper evaluates the role of an acquisition parameter, the frame cycle time "FCT", in the performance of an aS500-II EPID., Materials and Methods: The work presented rests on the study of the Varian EPID aS500-II and the image acquisition system 3 (IAS3). We are interested in integrated acquisition using asynchronous mode. For better understanding the image acquisition operation, we investigated the influence of the "frame cycle time" on the speed of acquisition, the pixel value of the averaged gray-scale frame and the noise, using 6 and 15MV X-ray beams and dose rates of 1-6Gy/min on 2100 C/D Linacs., Results: In the integrated mode not synchronized to beam pulses, only one parameter the frame cycle time "FCT" influences the pixel value. The pixel value of the averaged gray-scale frame is proportional to this parameter. When the FCT <55ms (speed of acquisition V(f/s)>18 frames/s), the speed of acquisition becomes unstable and leads to a fluctuation of the portal dose response. A timing instability and saturation are detected when the dose per frame exceeds 1.53MU/frame. Rules were deduced to avoid saturation and to optimize this dosimetric mode., Conclusion: The choice of the acquisition parameter is essential for the accurate portal dose imaging.

Purpose: In case of external breast radiotherapy, the usual treatment consists of two tangential beams homogeneously attenuated by a dynamic or physics wedge in order to obtain the most homogeneous dose distribution as possible. Depending of the shape and size of the breast volume, we may observe with this technique dose heterogeneity over 20% from the recommendation of the International Committee on Radiation Units and Measurements (95-107%). We propose to study breast treatment planning by compensating tissues thickness in order to decrease dose heterogeneity observed on the dose distribution for conventional treatment., Materials and Methods: We have segmented the initial tangential beams used for this kind of treatment into several smaller beams. Their shape was adapted to the distribution of the greys level on the DRR image. Therefore, we have compensated the thickness gradient and we have given the right dose to the right thickness group., Results: Dose distribution performed with this method shows an improvement of the dose homogeneity in the three space dimensions and a decrease of the maximal dose between 5 and 10% over the ICRU recommendation., Conclusion: This technique allows us to perform breast irradiation on a single photon energy linac even if the treated volume presents important thickness gradient. However, in case of large breast, this method is not able to reduce the overdosage at the entry of the volume due to inappropriate photon energy relative to the breast thickness.

Purpose: Retrospective comparison of Linac radiosurgery (RS) in 93 single brain metastases with or without a 2-mm margin., Patients and Methods: A total of 153 patients had Linac RS (between April 1992 and June 2004), with 139 patients (90.8%) evaluable in June 2005. Sixty-one patients (44%) had extracranial lesions and 65 patients had neurologic symptoms (47%). RS alone: 105 patients (66%); RS +whole brain radiotherapy: 34 patients (24%). Single metastasis: 93/139 patients; classic RS: 42/93 patients; 2-mm margin: 51/93 patients; 30 multiple lesions patients were excluded., Treatment: 15 Mv X-ray Linac, circular minibeams, 8-30 mm, four to six noncoplanar coronal arcs. Isodose was 60-80%; doses were 10-20 Gy., Follow-Up: 12 months-13 years; median, 14 months., Results: Local control (LC) was not improved in 51 margin patients vs. 42 classic RS patients: 1 year: 69.1% and 72.4%. Two-year LC rate: 64% and 54.7%, respectively. Survival: median classic RS: 11.3 months; margin RS, 19 months (p = 0.34) and 1 year, 41.6% and 60.2%, respectively. Margin RS patients had a significantly higher rate of severe parenchymal complications: 19.6% vs. 7.1% (p = 0.02); surgery was necessary in 4 of 51 cases vs. 1 of 42 classic RS cases., Conclusion: No increase of 1- and 2-year LC rate in margin RS or survival and median survival: 11.3 vs. 19 months (NS) 2-mm margin associated with more severe parenchymal complications (p = 0.02). This procedure is therefore not recommended. Late CT images and 1-mm margin as recommended by pathologists, use of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and fuzzy method to calculate volumes may yield better results. Stereotactic hypofractionation requires further studies.