Search

Academic neurology departments across the country have been rapidly adding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs over the past 5-10 years. These programs frequently come with leadership roles that carry a variety of names and responsibilities, such as vice chair of DEI or diversity officer. Furthermore, there are roles for members of the department to be involved with DEI work without being designated the departmental DEI leader. This article provides a framework for understanding the different responsibilities that are typically associated with each of these roles, along with reasonable expectations to associate with the respective job titles. Our goal is to prevent departments from asking too much or expecting too little based on the job title and support provided to the people in these positions. Likewise, we hope to empower DEI leaders who are currently asked to perform duties beyond their scope to obtain the title and support they have earned. For each departmental DEI role, we review prerequisites to success and potential impediments.

Objective: To describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of a two-week rotation intended to enhance junior surgical residents' preparation for their dedicated professional development time (PDT) and academic careers., Design: As part of a multifaceted effort to promote residents' academic development, we designed a two-week, nonclinical "Academic Development Block" (ADB) rotation for postgraduate year (PGY)-2 and -3 residents. During this rotation, residents meet with clinical, research, and peer mentors and work on academic activities, with relevant deliverables specific to each class year. We analyzed feedback from postrotation surveys and interviews, which were inductively coded and thematically analyzed, and data on resident grant applications and earnings before and after implementation., Setting: The general surgery residency program at a major urban, university-affiliated academic medical center. ADBs were first implemented in 2021., Participants: A total of 39 PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents rotated through the program with 51 ADBs over the first two years of implementation., Results: Surveys indicated overwhelmingly positive perceptions on the value of ADBs, including the amount of structure and resources available. Free-response and interview themes indicated appreciation for time to meet with mentors, develop ideas, and complete academic work. Residents believed the ADB rotation accelerated their transition into PDT and was a marker of institutional commitment. Areas for improvement pertained to the timing of ADBs and pairing of mentors. Both cohorts who participated in at least 1 ADB had higher proportions of residents who successfully applied for grants and a greater amount of total funding awarded compared to all 4 of the most recent cohorts prior to implementation., Conclusions: A short academic development rotation protected from clinical responsibilities is a well-regarded intervention to help residents refine their career goals and prepare for their PDT. Similar initiatives may be of interest to residency programs seeking to foster their residents' academic career development., (Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Overcrowding scores have been studied extensively in adult emergency departments (EDs), but few studies have determined utility in the pediatric setting. The objective of this study was to determine the association between a modified National Emergency Department Overcrowding Score (mNEDOCS) and established ED metrics in a large academic tertiary care pediatric ED., Methods: NEDOCS was modified to increase applicability in the pediatric setting by including the number of patients in resuscitation rooms instead of a number of patients on ventilators. Patient characteristics, ED disposition, ED length of stay (LOS), rate of left without being seen (LWBS), hospital LOS (HLOS), ED returns within 72 hours, and mNEDOCS were acquired retrospectively for every ED encounter in 2016-2019 using the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and multivariate analyses were calculated to evaluate the association between specific ED metrics and mNEDOCS., Results: Modified NEDOCS positively correlated with ED LOS, LWBS, and rate of 72-hour return visits. A negative correlation was found between mNEDOCS and HLOS. When controlling for select covariates, the odds of LWBS doubled with each increase in mNEDOCS category (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00-2.06), ED LOS was associated with an increase of 27 minutes as mNEDOCS category increased ( β = 26.80; 95% CI, 26.44-27.16), and the odds of 72-hour return visits increased by 6% when mNEDOCS increased by one category (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.07). Hospital LOS was associated with a 100-minute decrease per increase in mNEDOCS category ( β = -99.85; 95% CI, -180.68 to -18.48) when controlling for covariates., Conclusion: Modified NEDOCS is positively associated with ED LOS, LWBS, and 72-hour return visits, consistent with adult data. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the association between mNEDOCS and HLOS. This study illustrates the utility of mNEDOCS as a measure of overcrowding in a pediatric ED., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Hospital readmissions are associated with poor health outcomes including illness severity and medical complications. The objective of this study was to identify characteristics associated with 30-day post-stroke readmission in an academic urban hospital network., Materials and Methods: We collected data on patients admitted with stroke from 2017 through 2022 who were readmitted within 30 days of discharge and compared them to a subset of non-readmitted stroke patients. Chart review was used to collect demographics, characteristics of the stroke, co-morbid conditions, in-hospital complications, and post-discharge care. Univariate analyses followed by regression analysis were used to assess characteristics associated with post-stroke readmission., Results: We identified 4743 patients with stroke (18 % hemorrhagic, mean age 70.1 (standard deviation (SD) 17.2), 47.3 % female) discharged from the stroke services, of whom 282 (5.9 %) patients were readmitted within 30 days of index hospitalization. Univariate analyses identified 18 significantly different features between admitted and readmitted patients. Regression analysis revealed characteristics associated with readmission included private insurance (odds ratio (OR) 0.4, confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.6, p < 0.001), comorbid peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (OR 2.7, CI 1.3-5.5, p = 0.009), malignancy (OR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.6, p = 0.04), seizure (OR 3.4, CI 1.4-8.2, p = 0.007), thrombolytic administration (OR 0.4, CI 0.2-0.7, p = 0.003), undergoing thrombectomy (OR 5.4, CI 2.9-10.1, p < 0.001), and higher discharge modified Rankin Scale score (OR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.3, p = 0.047)., Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that thrombectomy, high discharge Rankin score, comorbid malignancy, seizure or PVD, and lack of thrombolytic administration or private insurance predict readmission., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

We evaluated the impact of implementing automated hepatitis C (HCV) opt-out screening in the emergency department of an urban, academic medical center with high HCV prevalence, in the context of a longstanding HCV opt-in screening model. We compared nine-month periods before and after implementation. HCV testing increased by 502%, and active HCV infection identification increased by 212%. Settings where there is great opportunity for HCV diagnosis, such as emergency department settings, should consider opt-out HCV screening models. ( Am J Public Health . 2024;114(11):1228-1231. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307783).

Introduction: The Vice-chair (VC) position is gaining popularity in academic orthopaedic surgery departments; however, there is a paucity of information regarding qualifications and career advancements associated with this role. The purpose of this study was to define the characteristics of current orthopaedic surgery department VCs., Design: Descriptive study following a retrospective web-based search utilizing the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA) database and orthopaedic surgery residency program websites., Setting: 200 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs across the United States., Participants: Program name and hospital affiliations were collected from the FREIDA database to account for all ACGME-accredited programs. The following information was derived from publicly available program websites: title, role description, previously trained institutions, academic rank, and concurrent roles of VCs. Research productivity was measured using the H-index. The previous roles of current Department Chairs (DC) were also evaluated., Results: Of the 178 VCs identified, VC of Research (n = 36; 20%), Education (n = 25; 14%), and Clinical Operations/Affairs (n = 21; 12%) were the most common titles. Women made up 17% (n = 30) of the VCs. Trauma (n = 36; 20%) was the most common fellowship subspecialty among VCs. The average H-index for VCs was 25. Among VCs, 94 (53%) were professors, 78 were also Chiefs/Heads/Directors (44%), 7 (4%) were Fellowship Directors, and 18 (10%) were Residency Directors. Twenty-six of 95 (27%) current DC had VC experience., Conclusion: The findings can facilitate effective leadership development, promotion of diversity and inclusion in these roles, and guidance for those who seek such leadership positions., (Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Many complex abdominal hernias are referred to tertiary academic institutions for evaluation and treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes from complex abdominal hernia repairs and abdominal wall reconstructions at a community hospital vs high volume academic centers participating in Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC)., Methods: Patients undergoing elective complex abdominal hernia repair were identified in our community setting and treated between 2016 and 2019. These results were then compared to Academic centers in the ACHQC database. Complex hernia definition was limited to those who have undergone any myofascial advancement procedure for homogeneity. Informed consent was obtained, and study was IRB approved. All data was de-identified., Results: A total of 180 patients underwent complex abdominal hernia repair at our community hospital. The ACHQC database identified 6299 patients meeting criteria at participating academic centers. Demographics were similar between the two groups including hernia grade, size and wound class. Academic centers tended to have patients with previous component separations (25.7% vs 10.6%) and immunosuppressed (7.2% vs 2.8%), while the community hospital patients included more patients with tobacco use (18.9% vs 12.1%) and hypertension (65% vs 54.9%). Operative times were significantly less at the community hospital, patients requiring >240 minutes of time for repair at academic centers (39.6% vs 5%). Postoperatively length of stay was significantly shorter at the community hospital group averaging 3.7 days vs academic centers of 6 days ( P < .05). Although overall complications were less in the community hospital group (26.5% vs 19.4%). Readmission within 30 days was nearly twice as frequent in the community hospital group (14.4% vs 7.7%)., Conclusion: Community hospitals can provide comparable care and surgical expertise as major academic centers in regard to complex hernias in a large majority of cases. There is a need for dedicated care coordination and continuous review of supporting staff and outcomes is necessary to assure quality care. There is still a need to identify which patients would benefit from treatment at an academic center as opposed to a community hospital in order to maximize patient access and outcomes at both types of hospital setting. Further investigation needs to be performed regarding criteria for which patients should be transferred to academic centers for their complex hernia care. Identifying patients who would benefit from treatment at Academic Centers as opposed to Community hospitals should continue to be investigated., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Trauma is a leading cause of global death, with 200 000 deaths and over 3 million non-fatal injuries/year in the United States. We aim to assess trauma care value for patients who underwent urgent laparotomies (LAP) and thoracotomies (THO) in our Health Network System., Methods: Clinical variables (v = 84) from trauma patients (>18 yo) were retrieved retrospectively (Jan-2010 to July-2016) and prospectively (Aug-2016 to Sept-2021) from a Health System warehouse under IRB-approved protocols. Patients were divided according to their Injury Severity Score (ISS) into mild/moderate cases (ISS <15) and severe cases (ISS >15). Value was assessed using quality and cost domains. Quality surrogates included graded postoperative complications (PCs), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission (RA), patient satisfaction (PS), and textbook (TB) cases. Total charges (TCs) and reimbursement index ( RI) were included as surrogates for cost. Value domains were displayed in scorecards comparing Observed (O) with Expected (E) (using the ACS risk calculator) outcomes. Uni-/multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS., Results: 41,927 trauma evaluations were performed, leading to 16 044 admissions, with 528 (3.2%) patients requiring urgent surgical procedures (LAP = 413 and THO = 115). Although the M:F ratio (7:3) was similar in LAP vs THO groups, age and BMI were significantly different (41.8 ± 19.1 vs 51.8 ± 19.9 years, 28.6 ± 9.9 vs 27.4 ± 7 Kg/m 2 , respectively, P < .05). Blunt trauma was involved in 68.8/77.3% of the LAP/THO procedures, respectively ( P < .05). Multivariate analyses showed ISS, age, ASA class, and medical center as factors significantly predicting PC ( P < .05). Postoperative complication grades from the LAP/THO groups showed above-average outcomes; nonetheless, LOS was higher than the national averages., Conclusions: The Trauma Program holds high value in our Health Network System. Protocols for decreasing LOS are being implemented., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Thiamine is the only therapy for prevention and treatment of Wernicke Encephalopathy among patients with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). Despite this fact, up to 75 % of inpatients with AUD are not prescribed thiamine during hospitalization. Even fewer patients are prescribed high-dose thiamine which many experts recommend should be standard of care. Previous attempts to improve thiamine prescribing for inpatients have had limited success., Methods: We conducted an evaluation of thiamine prescribing in the year before and year after an intervention to increase high-dose thiamine prescribing. Pre-post study analysis occurred on two distinct study cohorts: those with alcohol-related diagnoses and those with elevated alcohol levels. The intervention was new electronic health record-based decision support which encouraged high-dose thiamine when any thiamine order was sought. No educational support was provided. The primary outcome was prescription of high-dose thiamine before versus after intervention. Of those with alcohol-related diagnoses, the monthly percentage of thiamine treatment courses including high-dose thiamine were graphed on a control chart., Results: We examined 5307 admissions with alcohol-related diagnoses (2285 pre- and 3022 post-intervention) and 698 admissions with elevated alcohol levels (319 pre- and 379 post-intervention). Among admissions with alcohol-related diagnoses, the intervention was associated with a higher proportion of admissions receiving high-dose thiamine prescriptions in the first 24 h (4.7 % vs. 1.1 %, adjusted odds ratio 4.50, CI 2.93 to 6.89, p < 0.001). A similar difference in high-dose thiamine was seen post-intervention among admissions with elevated alcohol levels (14.3 % vs. 2.5 %, adjusted odds ratio 6.43, CI 3.05 to 13.53, p < 0.001). The control chart among those with an alcohol-related diagnosis demonstrated special cause variation: the median percentage of thiamine treatment courses including high-dose thiamine improved from 8.2 % to 13.0 %., Conclusions: Electronic decision support without educational interventions increased the use of high-dose thiamine among patients with alcohol-related diagnoses and with elevated alcohol levels during hospitalization. This increase occurred immediately in the month after the intervention and was sustained in the year-long study period after., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of the present manuscript have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High doses and prolonged duration of opioids are associated with tolerance, dependence, and increased mortality. Unfortunately, despite recent efforts to curb outpatient opioid prescribing because of the ongoing epidemic, utilization remains high in the intensive care setting, with intubated patients commonly receiving infusions with a potency much higher than doses required to achieve pain control. We attempted to use implementation science techniques to monitor and reduce excessive opioid prescribing in ventilated patients in our surgical intensive care unit (SICU)., Methods: We conducted a prospective study investigating opioid administration in a closed SICU at an academic medical center over 18 months. Commonly accepted conversions were used to aggregate daily patient opioid use. Patients with a history of chronic opioid use and those being treated with an intracranial pressure monitor/drain, neuromuscular blocker, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. If the patient spent a portion of a day on a ventilator, that day's total was included in the "vent group." morphine milligram equivalents per patient were collected for each patient and assigned to the on-call intensivist. Intensivists were blinded to the data for the first 7 months. They were then provided with academic detailing followed by audit and feedback over the subsequent 11 months, demonstrating how opioid utilization during their time in the SICU compared with the unit average and a blinded list of the other attendings. Student's t tests were performed to compare opioid utilization before and after initiation of academic detailing and audit and feedback., Results: Opioid utilization in patients on a ventilator decreased by 20.1% during the feedback period, including less variation among all intensivists and a 30.9% reduction by the highest prescribers., Conclusion: Implementation science approaches can effectively reduce variation in opioid prescribing, especially for high outliers in a SICU. These interventions may reduce the risks associated with prolonged use of high-dose opioids., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a significant problem worldwide. Many factors contribute to ED overcrowding, including staffing shortages, diagnostic testing delays, and inadequate inpatient beds to meet the demand. ED overcrowding results in patient safety issues like higher inpatient mortality and other negative impacts, such as an increased length of stay (LOS) and an increased trend of leaving the ED before undergoing an evaluation and treatment. The National emergency department overcrowding study (NEDOCS) is a scoring system to detect ED overcrowding objectively. Objective: To determine the impact of implementing an ED adult surge plan on ED throughput. Study Design: Prospective single-site study of adults presenting to the ED from January to April 2023. Setting or Dataset: Academic medical center. Population studied: Adult ED patients. Outcome Measures: Mean adult ED hold times, mean ED LOS, left without seen rate, mean door-to-doctor exam time, mean NEDOCS scores. Results: This analysis included 16,701 ED visits and 12,269 patients. During this time, 3,751 (22.5%) patients were admitted to inpatient status, and 1,413 (8.5%) were admitted to observation status. Pre-implementation, the mean ED hold time was 9.9 hours which decreased to 5.7 hours post-implementation (p=0.03). Pre-implementation, the mean ED LOS was 15.4 hours which decreased to 14.1 hours post-implementation (p=ns). Pre-implementation, the left without being seen rate was 4.8%, which decreased to 4.0% post-implementation (p=ns). Pre-implementation, the mean door-to-doctor exam time was 57.6 minutes which decreased to 54.0 minutes postimplementation (p=ns). Pre-implementation, the mean NEDOCS score was 186.2, which decreased to 131.2 post-implementation (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Our study suggests that implementing an ED adult surge plan can significantly improve ED hold hours and NEDOCS scores. However, it is important to note that other important ED throughput metrics (mean ED LOS, left without seen rate, mean door-to-doctor exam time) did not significantly improve. Further research may be necessary to understand the factors contributing to these outcomes and identify additional interventions that may improve ED throughput., Competing Interests: Authors report none., (2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.)

As the field of cell and gene therapy (CGT) continues to grow, so too must the infrastructure and regulatory guidance supporting the manufacture of these potentially life-saving products-especially early-phase products manufactured at an increasing number of academic or hospital-based facilities providing decentralized (or point of care) manufacturing. An important component of current good manufacturing practices, including those regulating cell and gene therapies, is the establishment of an effective environmental monitoring (EM) program. While several guidelines for establishing an EM program are available, these guidelines do not specifically address the unique aspects of manufacturing CGT products and they do not provide real-world evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the program. Here, we describe the establishment and evolution of an EM program in a cell therapy manufacturing facility at an academic hospital. With 10 years of EM data, we analyze the effectiveness for identifying trends in environmental conditions and highlight important findings, with the aim of providing practical evidence and guidance for the development of future early-phase EM programs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest PJH is an advisor or on the advisory board of Cellevolve, Cellenkos, March Biosciences, Autolomous and Microfluidx., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Many clinics and health systems implemented telemedicine appointment services out of necessity due to the COVID-19 pandemic., Objective: Our objective was to evaluate patient and general provider satisfaction with neurology telemedicine implementation at an urban academic medical center., Methods: Patients who had completed 1 or more teleneurology visits from April 1 to December 31, 2020, were asked to complete a survey regarding their demographic information and satisfaction with teleneurology visits. Providers of all specialties within the same hospital system were given a different survey to gather their experiences of providing telemedicine care., Results: Of the estimated 1500 patients who had completed a teleneurology visit within the given timeframe, 117 (7.8%) consented to complete the survey. Of these 117 respondents, most appointments were regarding epilepsy (n=59, 50.4%), followed by multiple sclerosis (n=33, 28.2%) and neuroimmunology (n=7, 6%). Overall, 74.4% (n=87) of patients rated their experience as 8 out of 10 or higher, with 10 being the highest satisfaction. Furthermore, 75.2% (n=88) of patients reported missing an appointment in the previous year due to transportation issues and thought telemedicine was more convenient instead. A significant relationship between racial or ethnic group and comfort sharing private information was found (P<.001), with 52% (26/50) of Black patients reporting that an office visit is better, compared to 25% (14/52) of non-Black patients. The provider survey gathered 40 responses, with 75% (n=30) of providers agreeing that virtual visits are a valuable tool for patient care and 80% (n=32) reporting few to no technical issues. The majority of provider respondents were physicians on faculty or staff (n=21, 52%), followed by residents or fellows (n=15, 38%) and nurse practitioners or physician assistants (n=4, 10%). Of the specialties represented, 15 (38%) of the providers were in neurology., Conclusions: Our study found adequate satisfaction among patients and providers regarding telemedicine implementation and its utility for patient care in a diverse urban population. Additionally, while access to technology and technology literacy are barriers to telemedical care, a substantial majority of patients who responded to the survey had access to devices (101/117, 86.3%) and were able to connect with few to no technological difficulties (84/117, 71.8%). One area identified by patients in need of improvement was comfortability in communicating via telemedicine with their providers. Furthermore, while providers agreed that telemedicine is a useful tool for patient care, it limits their ability to perform physical exams. More research and quality studies are needed to further appreciate and support the expansion of telemedical care into underserved and rural populations, especially in the area of subspecialty neurological care., (©Noah Robertson, Maryam J Syed, Bowen Song, Arshdeep Kaur, Janaki G Patel, Rohit Marawar, Maysaa Basha, Deepti Zutshi. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 30.10.2024.)

Background: Infectious diseases (ID) physicians are increasingly faced with the challenge of caring for patients with terminal illnesses or incurable infections., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of all patients with an ID consult within an academic health system from 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2023, including community, general, and transplant ID consult services., Results: There were 60 820 inpatient ID consults (17 235 community, 29 999 general, and 13 586 transplant) involving 37 848 unique patients. The number of consults increased by 94% and the rate rose from 5.0 to 9.9 consults per 100 inpatients (P < .001). In total, 7.5% of patients receiving an ID consult died during admission and 1006 (2.6%) of patients were discharged to hospice. In-hospital mortality was 5.2% for community ID, 7.8% for general ID, and 10.7% for transplant ID patients (P < .001). Six-month mortality was 9% for all nonobstetric admissions versus 19% for community ID, 20.9% for general ID, and 22.3% for transplant ID. In total 2866 (7.6%) of all patients receiving ID consultation also received palliative care consultation during the same hospitalization. The index ID consult preceded any palliative consult in the majority (69.5%) of cases. A total of 16.3% of patients had a do-not-resuscitate order during the index hospitalization; 12.2% of all patients with a do-not-resuscitate order had this placed on the same day as the ID consult., Conclusions: Patients receiving ID consultation were increasingly complex and more likely to die soon after consultation. These results provide a framework for ID clinicians to consider their role in end-of-life care., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Coaching in academic medicine may help learners develop lifelong learning skills. Studies typically evaluate the impact on coachees and program outcomes. Limited information is available about educating faculty to integrate the role of coaching. We explored a faculty coach training program at an academic medical center in the southern region of the United States., Methods: Twenty faculty members in the college of medicine completed the 34-h training program meeting alternate weeks from May to November 2021. We collected data from reflections during training, a post-training survey, and three post-training focus group discussions making this a qualitatively driven mixed methods research. We used a transcendental phenomenological approach for the qualitative analysis entailing deriving essential meaning of the participants' training experiences and perceptions about coaching., Results: We identified 3 themes (1) perceptions, skills, and understanding of coaching, (2) perceived additional benefits from coach training, and (3) effective instructional practices to teach coaching. Under the first theme, participants expressed improved understanding about the process of coaching in academic medicine, noted the importance of listening to the whole person without judgment, questioning with curiosity, vulnerability, self-awareness, and reflection for building trust. Perceived additional benefits included personal development and illuminating discoveries. Sub-themes for effective instructional practices were learning community encompassing mindfulness, psychological safety, social cohesion, experiential and interactive learning, and suggestions. Faculty experienced internal transformation while learning coaching and felt they had the capacity to influence personal and professional development of learners and colleagues. The concepts reflection, awareness, growth, and relationship were threaded throughout the three themes., Conclusions: The training evoked self-awareness and opportunities for personal growth. The newly trained coaches expressed the beginning of an internal transformation to embody being a coach and demonstrated willingness to influence personal and professional development of learners and colleagues. Effective instructional practices to teach coaching included mindfulness practice, psychological safety, social cohesion, and experiential and interactive learning. Based on these findings, it may be summarized that in the process of training to be a coach, the faculty not only recognized the benefits of coaching for learners but also realized individual personal benefits., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The closure of a pharmacy-led anticoagulation clinic, which provided point-of-care (POC) international normalized ratio (INR) testing and face-to-face visits, coupled with the transition to an academic physician-led clinic without POC INR testing and reliance on telephone communication, created significant challenges for warfarin management during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The aim of this quality control project was to increase the percentage of patients on warfarin within the optimal time in therapeutic range (TTR) from 52.30% to 65.00%, sustain baseline quarterly cumulative percentage TTR to 59.00%, and transition 20% of eligible patients from warfarin to dual oral anticoagulation (DOAC) within 12 months., Methods: A multidisciplinary team employed a Fishbone diagram, stakeholder analysis, process flow map, and a driver diagram. Significant barriers included knowledge gaps, fear of blood draws, lack of POC INR testing, and noninteroperable electronic health records (EHRs). Primary outcome measures included quarterly cumulative percentage TTR, 2-monthly percentage TTR, and the percentage of eligible patients switched to DOAC. Process measures included INR completion rates. Key interventions involved educating patients and the care team, transitioning patients to DOAC, improving EHRs, and optimizing processes. Data analysis utilized run charts., Results: Monthly INR completion rates rose from 63% to 87% within 12 months and reached 92% during the 6 months post-project period. Among 143 patients, 40.55% (58) were eligible for a DOAC switch, with 51.72% (30/58) successfully transitioning during the project and the 6-month post-project period. Two-monthly TTR rates improved from the baseline of 52.30% to 62.00% during the study period and remained sustainable at 62.80% in the post-project phase. Quarterly cumulative TTR rates remained stable at 59.20% during the study period in 2021. The quarterly cumulative TTR rates continued to increase at 60.50% and 64.40% in 2022 and 2023, respectively, during the post-project period. No bleeding episodes occurred during the 15-month post-project period., Conclusion: Multi-faceted strategies significantly improved warfarin safety during the project and maintained these improvements for 24 months. Transitioning from warfarin to DOACs was crucial for optimizing anticoagulation management with limited resources. The lead physician and team used various tools to address barriers to effective warfarin management, ensure appropriate DOAC prescribing, and enhance practices for DOAC prescriptions. This project effectively addressed barriers, improved population health, and provided a model for anticoagulation management in primary care settings., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Medical oncology is a rapidly evolving field, with new medications being discovered yearly, contributing to increased survival rates. However, accessing drugs in a timely manner can be challenging. In Quebec, Canada, a physician can prescribe an unlisted anticancer treatment through a regulated pathway under exceptional circumstances. We conducted a quality improvement study describing the outcomes of incurable cancer patients receiving unlisted anticancer therapy at the Jewish General Hospital between 2018 and 2019. Though our study did not include a comparator arm, unlisted anticancer therapies were associated with interesting median progression-free survival (11 months) and overall survival (25 months). Moreover, a large proportion of treatments, 44%, were subsequently reimbursed in the province of Quebec. Given the delay in anticancer drug reimbursement, this pathway is essential for timely access to oncology drugs. Such 'special access' programs will likely become increasingly important as precision medicine becomes the standard of practice.

Purpose: Physician-to-physician electronic consultation (eConsults) are used across specialties; however, their effectiveness in ophthalmology has not been reported. This study evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a physician-to-physician ophthalmology eConsult program, assessed the timeliness of in-person evaluation, and characterized the clinical questions of non-ophthalmology providers., Methods: Retrospective review of patients for whom an ophthalmology eConsult was placed to Massachusetts Eye and Ear from February 2019-August 2021. The eConsults were reviewed to identify submission-to-response time, primary diagnoses by eConsultant, and referral outcomes. The eConsults were categorized based on clinical question, urgency, and ophthalmic condition addressed. Demographic data on patients and referring providers were collected., Results: One hundred ophthalmology eConsults were placed, and 100% were responded to by an ophthalmologist. An average of 1.6 ± 1.9 days elapsed from the time of eConsult to completion. Of the 30 patients who presented for in-person evaluation at an ophthalmology clinic, diagnostic concordance between eConsultant and in-person ophthalmologist was observed in 93% of cases (n = 28 of 30). An average of 28.9 ± 27.4 days from eConsult response to in-person follow-up was observed. The most common clinical inquiries were about appropriate triage/referral (24.4%), management (22%), and diagnosis (19.7%). All eConsults were non-urgent. The most common ophthalmic condition addressed was chalazia/hordeola (14%). Only 5% of patients presented to an emergency department for the same ophthalmic concern addressed by eConsult., Conclusions: Ophthalmology eConsults provide timely access to nonurgent ocular diagnosis, triage, and management and in our study seem to provide high rates of diagnostic accuracy for nonurgent ophthalmic conditions., Translational Relevance: Using ophthalmic eConsults can facilitate timely access to specialty care and reduce patient and provider burden.

Purpose: Antiretroviral therapy has revolutionized HIV treatment with didanosine (DDI) as a pioneering drug. However, DDI has been associated with retinal toxicity, characterized by peripheral chorioretinal degeneration with macular sparing. Despite its clinical recognition, the prevalence and risk factors for didanosine-induced retinopathy are not well described., Methods: This retrospective case series analyzed 127 DDI-treated patients at Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Ophthalmology. Inclusion criteria included at least 6 months of DDI use and available ultra-widefield imaging. Patients were categorized as affected or unaffected based on retinal imaging assessed by two reviewers. The affected group was further divided into "probable" or "possible" retinopathy. Patient demographics, DDI usage characteristics, and imaging findings were analyzed with statistical comparisons drawn between affected and unaffected cohorts., Results: Of the 127 patients, 9 (7%) showed signs of didanosine-induced retinal toxicity. On average, the affected group was older compared with the unaffected group (65.1 vs. 56.5 years, P = 0.025), with lower BMI (23.2 vs. 27.4, P = 0.04), and older at the start of the treatment (51.6 vs. 40.8 years, P = 0.026). Mild phenotypes with peripheral pigmentary changes were also identified using ultra-widefield imaging., Conclusion: This pioneering academic study highlighted a notable prevalence of DDI-induced retinal toxicity. Statistical analysis demonstrated age, BMI, and age at treatment initiation as potential risk factors. Ultra-widefield autofluorescence emerged as a valuable tool in detecting and delineating findings. Follow-up studies are needed to determine the necessity of regular screening for individuals on or with a history of didanosine use.

Objective: To investigate the current state of clinical practice and training regarding the use of cardiac point of care ultrasound (cPOCUS) in neonatal intensive care units., Study Design: An online survey was disseminated through the Association of Academic Directors of Neonatology to appraise clinical usage, infrastructure, and training for cPOCUS. A single response per center was obtained., Results: Overall survey response rate was 51% (48/94). Of respondents [40/48 (83%)] who reported having a POCUS program, 19/40 (47%) reported performing cPOCUS. In 74% of centers, <10 cPOCUS studies are performed monthly. Only 16% (3/19) of centers had standardized imaging protocols. The most common indication for cPOCUS was central line evaluation. Only 9 (19%) programs reported cPOCUS training, of whom 4 had a formalized process of ongoing competency assessment., Conclusion: Although use of cPOCUS is increasing, program infrastructure and governance, training, and evaluation vary markedly between institutions and are missing in many. There is an urgent need to develop consensus standards regarding clinical practice and training., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Objective: This study aimed to examine racial-ethnic differences in engagement with and clinical outcomes of a collaborative care model (CoCM) implemented in primary care outpatient clinics in an urban academic medical center., Methods: Adult patients (N=4,911) who screened positive for symptoms of depression, anxiety, or both on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale and who identified as non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic White were offered participation in a CoCM implementation. The primary outcome was treatment engagement, defined as receipt of any follow-up visit, minimally adequate 4-week follow-up (at least one visit), and minimally adequate 16-week follow-up (at least three visits) after initial assessment. Secondary outcomes were response and remission of depression or anxiety., Results: After adjustment of analyses for sociodemographic covariates, Black and Hispanic participants were significantly less likely than White participants to have received any or minimally adequate follow-up. Black and Hispanic participants who received any or minimally adequate 16-week follow-up were more likely than White participants to demonstrate depression symptom response and remission of anxiety symptoms., Conclusions: This CoCM implementation appears to have been effective in treating depression and anxiety among Black and Hispanic patients. However, significant disparities in receipt of follow-up care were observed. Efforts must be made to improve the retention of patients from racial-ethnic minority groups in collaborative care., Competing Interests: Dr. Chung reports serving as an external adviser to McKinsey & Company, adviser to Otsuka, and consultant to Valera Health. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Purpose: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a low-frequency, high-risk event that can occur within minutes of a patient receiving a local anesthetic. The goals of this project were to standardize LAST care management across an academic medical center and sustain an improvement in nurses' knowledge of how to recognize signs and symptoms of LAST and how to competently manage a LAST scenario., Design: We used a quantitative design to accomplish the goals of the project., Methods: Our interdisciplinary team developed a clinical practice guideline based on the LAST Checklist published by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and used a simulation scaffolded by multimodal education and system changes to ensure sustained knowledge. We measured improvement using a graded knowledge assessment as well as qualitative feedback., Findings: Scores on the assessment increased from 4.76 to 6.34 (out of seven points) following the intervention and remained significantly higher than the baseline 9 months after the educational intervention (9-month score = 6.19, t = 2.99, P = .004). Nurses reported feeling more confident and knowledgeable following the intervention and requested to have regular sessions of the simulation. To sustain improvements, we developed a computer-based learning module. The module and simulation were integrated into nursing orientation and an annual competency., Conclusions: While standardizing LAST care in accordance with evidence-based guidance is critical to patient safety due to its infrequent occurrence, nurses should consider implementing simulation supplemented with multimodal education and system changes to ensure sustained knowledge., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We sought to determine the premium associated with a career in academic surgery, as measured by compensation normalized to the work relative value unit (wRVU)., Background: An academic surgical career embodying innovation and mentorship offers intrinsic rewards but is not well monetized. We know compensation for academic surgeons is less than their nonacademic counterparts, but the value of clinical effort, as normalized to the wRVU, between academic and nonacademic surgeons has not been well characterized. Thus, we analyzed the variations in the valuation of academic and nonacademic surgical work from 2010 to 2022., Methods: We utilized Medical Group Management Association Provider Compensation data from 2010, 2014, 2018, and 2022 to compare academic and nonacademic surgeons. We analyzed raw total cash compensation (TCC), wRVU, TCC per wRVU (TCC/wRVU), and TCC to collections (TCCtColl). We calculated collections per wRVU (Coll/wRVU). We adjusted TCC and TCCtColl for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. Linear modeling for trend analysis was performed., Results: Compared with nonacademic, academic surgeons had lower TCC (2010: $500,415.0±23,666 vs $631,515.5±23,948.2, -21%; 2022: $564,789.8±23,993.9 vs $628,247.4±15,753.2, -10%), despite higher wRVUs (2022: 9109.4±474.9 vs 8062.7±252.7) and higher Coll/wRVU (2022: 76.68±8.15 vs 71.80±6.10). Trend analysis indicated that TCC will converge in 2038 at an estimated $660,931., Conclusions: In 2022, academic surgeons had more clinical activity and superior organizational revenue capture, despite less total and normalized clinical compensation. On the basis of TCC/wRVUs, academia charges a premium of 16% over nonacademic surgery. However, trend analysis suggests that TCC will converge within the next 20 years., Competing Interests: T.Z. is currently receiving grant funding from the NIH (T32GM144274). The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prior pandemic research has focused on physicians and nurses who provide direct patient care. Literature on the experiences of nonnurse/physician clinicians and nonclinical health care professionals is sparse., Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted over threetime points to examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical and nonclinical healthcare professionals ( n = 464)., Findings: There were no significant differences in distress across survey waves, except for anger ( p = .046). No significant differences in distress scores were found between job types. Multiple linear regression results varied. Both the threat and interrupted plans scores were significant predictors of distress. Resources available to healthcare providers (HCPs) were underutilized in all three waves., Conclusions: Healthcare professionals' distress increases with exposure. Integrating self-care resources for staff may mitigate the impact and maintain a healthy work environment., Application to Practice: Occupational health providers should incorporate these findings when developing opportunities to address the needs of health care professionals in the workplace., Competing Interests: Conflict of InterestThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: To compare operative time and case characteristics of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repairs between academic and community vitreoretinal surgeons., Design: A retrospective, observational clinical study., Subjects: Patients who underwent primary RRD repair surgeries at Massachusetts Eye and Ear between 2019 and 2021., Methods: A random sample of 20 vitreoretinal surgeons distributed evenly among the academic or community setting was selected. Fifteen consecutive cases of primary RRD repair surgeries were included from each surgeon. A cost analysis was performed for the teaching modifier for the physician fee and for hospital costs., Main Outcome Measures: Length of surgery., Results: Of 300 primary RRD repairs, fellows were present in 75%, which comprised all academic surgeon cases and 50% of community surgeon cases, P < 0.001. Mean operation length was shorter for community surgeon cases without fellows (55.0 ± 24.1) than either academic (73.0 ± 30.8) or community surgeon cases with fellows (75.7 ± 32.5) (P < 0.001). There was a higher percentage of macula-off RRDs in academic versus community surgeon cases (52.7% vs. 38.0%, P = 0.002) and higher rates of combined scleral buckle (SB)/pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) repairs (14% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). When excluding combined SB/PPV cases, there was no difference in operative time between academic and community surgeon cases. Among RRDs repaired by PPV only, there was a 31.4% (16.6 minutes) greater procedure duration in cases with fellows compared with cases without fellows (P < 0.001). Covariates associated with greater surgery time: addition of an SB (β = 32.6), membrane peel (β = 18.5), presence of a fellow (β = 14.5), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (β = 12.8), and greater number of retinal breaks (β = 2.4). The teaching modifier adds 16% extra reimbursement ($184.16) to the physician fee, which is 50.9% of what is necessary to cover the percentage increase in surgeon time (31.4%). Using a time-driven activity-based costing for hospital costs, the extra 16.6 minutes leads to an additional $1038.00, which is 5.6 times more than the reimbursement for the modifier., Conclusions: Retinal detachment repair cases performed by academic surgeons are more likely to be macula-off and include the addition of an SB, which drive longer operative times. Medicare's reimbursement of the assistant modifier in a teaching facility significantly undercompensates the time-driven activity-based costing of trainee participation., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A multidisciplinary Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement study to identify the incidence of "heparin rebound" in our adult cardiac surgical population instead detected a thromboelastometry pattern suggestive of initial protamine overdose in 34% despite Hepcon-guided anticoagulation management. Analysis of our practice led to an intervention that made an additional lower-range Hepcon cartridge available to the perfusionists., Methods: One year later, an IRB-approved retrospective study was conducted in >500 patients to analyze the effects of the intervention, specifically focusing on the impact of the initial protamine dose accuracy and 18-h mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTd)., Results: No differences were observed between group demographics, surgical procedures, duration of CPB or perioperative blood product transfusion. Both groups were managed using the same perfusion and anesthesia equipment, strategies, and protocols. The median initial protamine dose decreased by 19% ( p < .001) in the intervention group (170 [IQR 140-220] mg; n = 295) versus the control group (210 [180-250] mg; n = 257). Mean 18-h MCTd decreased by 13% ( p < .001) in the intervention group (405.15 ± 231.54 mL; n = 295) versus the control group (466.13 ± 286.73 mL; n = 257). Covariate-adjusted mixed effects model showed a significant reduction of MCTd in the intervention group, starting from hour 11 after surgery (group by time interaction p = .002)., Conclusion: Though previous investigators have associated lower protamine doses with less MCTd, this study demonstrates that more accurately matching the initial protamine dose to the remaining circulating heparin concentration reduces postoperative bleeding., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Luspatercept is approved for patients with very low-to intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Dosing is based on pre-dose hemoglobin levels and transfusion requirements. This study aims to evaluate if a site with a pharmacist prospectively reviewing luspatercept doses achieves dose optimization, compared to a site that does not have a pharmacist prospectively reviewing doses. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review involving patients age ≥18 years or older with MDS at a major academic medical center main campus, which does not have a pharmacist prospectively review luspatercept doses, and a satellite campus infusion center, which has a pharmacist prospectively reviewing doses. Patients included received at least one dose of luspatercept between January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2022. The primary endpoint is the percentage of off-label luspatercept doses not consistent with prescribing information (PI) recommended dose adjustments. Results: The study included 17 patients. Of the 162 doses evaluated, 37 (23%) were off-label. Off-label dosing at the main campus was more common than at a satellite location (29.6% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.003). More patients achieved transfusion independence at the satellite compared to the main campus (83.3% vs. 27.3% p < 0.39). Conclusions: There was a higher percentage of off-label dosing at a center without a pharmacist's prospective review vs. a center with a pharmacist's prospective review. On-label dose optimization may lead to a higher percentage of patients achieving transfusion independence. Enhancements in the current ordering and review process can be improved with the involvement of a pharmacist's prospective involvement at both centers., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

In 2019, Indiana University launched the Precision Health Initiative to enhance the institutional adoption of precision medicine, including pharmacogenetics (PGx) implementation, at university-affiliated practice sites across Indiana. The overarching goal of this PGx implementation program was to facilitate the sustainable adoption of genotype-guided prescribing into routine clinical care. To accomplish this goal, we pursued the following specific objectives: (i) to integrate PGx testing into existing healthcare system processes; (ii) to implement drug-gene pairs with high-level evidence and educate providers and pharmacists on established clinical management recommendations; (iii) to engage key stakeholders, including patients to optimize the return of results for PGx testing; (iv) to reduce health disparities through the targeted inclusion of underrepresented populations; (v) and to track third-party reimbursement. This tutorial details our multifaceted PGx implementation program, including descriptions of our interventions, the critical challenges faced, and the major program successes. By describing our experience, we aim to assist other clinical teams in achieving sustainable PGx implementation in their health systems., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Purpose: Prior literature evaluating the importance of timely second-dose antibiotics in patients with sepsis has led to better outcomes and a possible reduction in mortality, length of mechanical ventilation, and length of time requiring vasopressors. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a newly developed pharmacist-led two-dose cefepime protocol implemented within an emergency department (ED) service. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, pre-post observational cohort study. Institutional review board approval was obtained. The primary endpoint was a reduction in time between the first and the second doses of antibiotics for patients with sepsis who present to the emergency department. Secondary endpoints included length of vasopressor therapy, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality. Results: A total of 84 patients were included in the pharmacist-led two-dose hospital protocol and 79 patients were included in the historical control. In the control cohort, the median time between the first and second dose of antibiotics was 12 hours vs 8.5 hours in the tested cohort. The average time requiring vasopressors was 1.20 days for the control cohort vs .46 days for the post-implementation group. Lastly, the median hospital length of stay in days was 8 for the control group vs 7 for the tested cohort. Conclusion: Implementation of a pharmacist-led two-dose cefepime protocol was associated with a numerically lower duration between second-dose antibiotics, days requiring vasopressors, and a slight reduction in hospital length of stay., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Hospital-at-home has become a more recognized way to care for patients requiring inpatient hospitalization. At times, these patients may require escalation of care (transfer from home back to the brick-and-mortar (BAM) hospital for ongoing hospitalization care needs), a process that has not been extensively studied., Objective: To evaluate what patient factors contribute to escalations of care in the hospital-at-home delivery model., Designs, Settings, and Participants: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients admitted to Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022., Intervention: None., Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient information was collected via electronic health record including demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical status. The primary outcome was the of occurrence of an escalation., Results: A total of 904 patients were included, of whom 80 (8.8%) required an escalation of care. In multivariable analysis, risk of an escalation was significantly higher for patients who were married or had a life partner (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.05-3.23, p = .033) for patients admitted with procedure-related disorders (HR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.35-5.05, p = .005) and patients with an increased mortality risk score (HR [per each 1-category increase] = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.39-2.50, p < .001)., (© 2024 Society of Hospital Medicine.)

Introduction: Buprenorphine is a partial mu opioid receptor agonist with high affinity to its receptor, which raises concerns of blocking or displacing full opioid agonists when used during the perioperative period of surgical patients. However, buprenorphine itself has high analgesic potency and discontinuing buprenorphine may lead to suboptimal pain control and risk for opioid use disorder relapse. There is limited data for the continuation of buprenorphine perioperatively., Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study of adult surgical patients taking buprenorphine for opioid use disorder at an urban, teaching, level 1 trauma center. Patients were split into two groups based on whether buprenorphine was continued (n = 46) or held (n = 28) within the first 48 h after surgery., Results: Those who had buprenorphine continued in the first 48 h postoperatively required half the dose of nonbuprenorphine opioids compared to those who had buprenorphine held (113.25 versus 255.75 oral morphine equivalents, P = 0.0040). Both groups had a similar level of analgesia and incidence of adverse events. Nearly all patients who continued buprenorphine in the first 48 h postoperatively were discharged on this agent, while only half of patients who had buprenorphine held were restarted on it at discharge (92.68% versus 56.52%, P = 0.0013)., Conclusions: This present study found lower nonbuprenorphine opioid requirements in patients with continued versus held perioperative buprenorphine use with no difference in degree of analgesia., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ambulatory access to academic medical centers (AMCs) for patients insured with Medi-Cal (i.e., Medicaid in California) is understudied, particularly among the 85% of beneficiaries enrolled in managed care plans. As more AMCs develop partnerships with these plans, data on patient experiences of access to care and quality are needed to guide patient-centered improvements in care delivery., Methods: The authors conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with Medi-Cal-insured patients with initial visits at a large, urban AMC during 2022. Participant recruitment was informed by a database of ambulatory Medi-Cal encounters. The interview guide covered Medi-Cal enrollment, scheduling, and visit experience. Interviews were transcribed and inductively coded, then organized into themes across four domains: access, affordability, patient-provider interactions, and continuity., Results: Twenty participant interviews were completed (55% female, 85% English speaking, 80% self-identified minority or "other" race, and 30% Hispanic or Latino) with primary and/or specialty care visits. Within the access domain, participants reported delays with Medi-Cal enrollment and access to specialist care or testing, though appointment scheduling was reported to be easy. Affordability concerns included out-of-pocket medical and parking costs, and missed income when patients or families skipped work to facilitate care coordination. Participants considered clear, bilateral communication with providers fundamental to positive patient-provider interactions. Some participants perceived discrimination by providers based on their insurance status. Participants valued continuity, but experienced frustration arising from frequent and unexpected health plan changes that disrupted care with their established AMC providers., Conclusions: The missions of AMCs typically focus on clinical care, education, research, and equity. However, reports from Medi-Cal insured patients receiving care at AMCs highlight their stress and confusion related to inconsistent provider access, uncompensated costs, variability in perceptions of quality, and fragmented care. Recommendations based upon patient-reported concerns suggest opportunities for AMC health system-level improvements that are compatible with AMC missions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Acute otitis media (AOM) accounts for roughly 25% of antibiotics prescribed to children annually. Despite national guidelines that recommend short (5-7 days) durations of antibiotics for children 2 years and older with AOM, most receive long (10 day) courses. This study aims to evaluate antibiotic durations prescribed for children aged 2-17 years with uncomplicated AOM across two pediatric academic health systems, and to assess the variability in prescribed durations between and within each system., Methods: Electronic medical record data from 135 care locations at two health systems were retrospectively analyzed. Outpatient encounters for children aged 2-17 years with a diagnosis of AOM from 2019 to 2022 were included. The primary outcome was the percent of 5-day prescriptions. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of 7-day prescriptions, 10-day prescriptions, prescriptions for nonfirst-line antibiotics, cases associated with treatment failure, AOM recurrence, and adverse drug events., Results: Among 73 198 AOM encounters for children 2 years and older, 61 612 (84%) encounters resulted in an antibiotic prescription. Most prescriptions were for 10 days (45 689; 75%), 20% were for 7 days (12 060), and only 5% were for 5 days (3144). Treatment failure, AOM recurrence, adverse drug events, hospitalizations, and office, emergency department or urgent-care visits for AOM within 30 days after the index visit were rare., Conclusions: Despite national guidelines that recommend shorter durations for children with uncomplicated AOM, 75% of our cohort received 10-day durations. Shortening durations of therapy for AOM could reduce antibiotic exposure and should be a priority of pediatric antibiotic stewardship programs., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.)

Purpose: Despite national recommendations to standardize infusion concentrations, there is minimal guidance on institution-specific strategies and outcomes related to epidural infusion concentration standardization and optimization. The purpose of this project is to identify the optimal compounded preparation for use in select adult epidural infusions and assess the impact on drug and fluid utilization and cost savings if the designated preparation is adopted., Methods: A previously validated tool, the VERB (vial, exchange, rate, and bag) analysis, was applied to epidural infusion pump administration data to identify preparations optimized for efficient supply and resource utilization at a large academic medical center., Results: Weighing all components of the VERB analysis, the preferred preparation of hydromorphone and bupivacaine for the hospital site was hydromorphone (10 µg/mL) and bupivacaine (0.125%) in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection (2,500 µg of hydromorphone per epidural). The preferred preparation of fentanyl and bupivacaine was fentanyl (2 µg/mL) and bupivacaine (0.0625%) in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection (100 µg of fentanyl per epidural). Both recommendations are different from the currently utilized preparations at the study site., Conclusion: Analyzing historic drug administration data using the novel 4-step VERB analysis identified optimized drug preparations and fluid bag sizes for the most-prescribed epidural drug combinations at the hospital study site., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: There is a growing body of evidence on shared decision-making (SDM) training programs worldwide. However, there is wide variation in program design, duration, effectiveness, and evaluation in both academia (ie, medical school) and the practice setting. SDM training has been slow to integrate in practice settings., Methods: A pilot study of 6 multidisciplinary clinicians was conducted using quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate changes in participant understanding and implementation of SDM in the practice setting. A 2-rater criterion-based evaluation method was used to assess a simulation-based case study role-play program using 7 domains of SDM pre and post training. The authors assessed whether clinicians addressed each of the 7 domains or what fraction of each domain was addressed as part of their simulation case study role-play performance. Focus groups were conducted pre- and postintervention to provide feedback to participants and to understand the clinician experience in greater detail., Results: The increase in improvement in SDM ranged from 17% to 37%, and 7 of 8 domains for which participants were rated showed significant improvement. The areas of greatest improvement were seen in determining a patient's goals/preferences, including risk tolerance regarding treatments (+37%) and values and self-efficacy (+37%)., Conclusion: The results of this study reveal a significant shift in clinician awareness of a patient's goals, preferences, and values. Postintervention, clinicians began to understand the value of building a partnership with their patients whereby the patient becomes an active participant in their clinical care., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest This work was developed using data from Projects In Knowledge Powered by Kaplan (PIK). The results and findings are entirely the authors’ own and were not influenced by thoughts or opinions from PIK.

Research conducted on homogenous populations can lead to biased and misleading findings, impeding the development of effective interventions and treatments for diverse populations. Low participation among minority groups further leads to disparities in access to innovative cancer care and treatment outcomes associated with trial participation. To better understand cancer patients' attitudes and willingness to participate in clinical trials, solid tumor patients attending their clinic visits were invited to complete a survey. The survey included questions on demographics, previous trial participation, and future trial interest. Responses were analyzed with frequency tables and chi-square tests. Of 300 participants, only 96 (32%) were asked to participate in a clinical trial. Of these, 81 (84%) chose to participate and 15 (16%) did not. There were notable differences by race but not gender or education level. Of the 204 who had never been asked to participate, 70% indicated that they would be willing to participate in future, and there was a strong sex-race interaction. Non-White males were the most hesitant group. Of 204, 99% indicated that they would participate to access new treatments, and 57% would participate to contribute to research overall. This study shows that many solid tumor patients undergoing treatment are not offered clinical trials. Racial differences in attitudes toward trial participation are evident. Nonetheless, many patients are willing to participate in trials to access innovative treatments and to support research. Culturally relevant outreach to build trust with minority groups is needed to increase overall participation in clinical trials.

Given the cost and unclear clinical impact of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), laboratory stewardship may improve utilization. This retrospective observational study examines mNGS results from two academic medical centers employing different stewardship approaches. Eighty mNGS orders [54 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and 26 plasma] were identified from 2019 to 2021 at the University of Washington (UW), which requires director-level approval for mNGS orders, and the University of Utah (Utah), which does not restrict ordering. The impact of mNGS results and the relationship to traditional microbiology orders were evaluated. Nineteen percent (10/54) of CSF and 65% (17/26) of plasma studies detected at least one organism. Compared to CSF results, plasma results more frequently identified clinically significant organisms (31% vs 7%) and pathogens not detected by traditional methods (12% vs 0%). Antibiotic management was more frequently impacted by plasma versus CSF results (31% vs 4%). These outcome measures were not statistically different between study sites. The number and cumulative cost of traditional microbiology tests at UW were greater than Utah for CSF mNGS testing (UW: 46 tests, $6,237; Utah: 26 tests, $2,812; P < 0.05) but similar for plasma mNGS (UW: 31 tests, $3,975; Utah: 21 tests, $2,715; P = 0.14). mNGS testing accounted for 30%-50% of the total microbiology costs. Improving the diagnostic performance of mNGS by stewardship remains challenging due to low positivity rates and difficulties assessing clinical impact. From a fiscal perspective, stewardship efforts should focus on reducing testing in low-yield populations given the high costs of mNGS relative to overall microbiology testing expenditures., Importance: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) stewardship practices remain poorly standardized. This study aims to provide actionable insights for institutions that seek to reduce the unnecessary usage of mNGS. Importantly, we highlight that clinical impact remains challenging to measure without standardized guidelines, and we provide an actual cost estimate of microbiology expenditures on individuals undergoing mNGS., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objective: This paper describes how the administrative leadership of 1 physical therapy department curated, implemented, and evaluated a culturally responsive administrative support strategy to foster a positive working environment. Participants' perceptions of culturally responsive practices were explored using climate survey data., Methods: This case occurred in the physical therapy and rehabilitation science department at an academic medical center in the United States. The department administers 5 educational programs, 3 faculty practices, a community clinic, and a robust research enterprise and employs over 100 employees. After a historic sociocultural event, administrators implemented a series of actions to understand the needs of department employees and to respond in a culturally responsive manner. Interventions included supportive activities, educational opportunities, and community-building events. The department administered an annual climate survey to assess the employees' perceptions of the working climate, perceived impacts of the culturally responsive interventions, and suggestions for improving department climate. Survey analysis included frequency statistics and thematic content analysis with sensitizing concepts from a culturally responsive practice framework previously applied in primary and secondary school settings., Results: A total of 131 employees participated in the annual climate survey from 2020 to 2022. Employees' confidence to identify and address microaggressions in working environments showed trends of overall improvement, and overall self-reported experiences with racial discrimination decreased. Participants reported positive trends in addressing discrimination among colleagues but also reported addressing offensive behaviors perpetrated by patients., Conclusion: Findings suggest that culturally responsive interventions are associated with positive trends in employee climate. Interventions tailored to the audience and curated to deepen cultural knowledge, enhance self-awareness, and validate others fostered a shared commitment to cultural equity., Impact: Administrative leaders have a role in fostering an inclusive climate by capitalizing on culturally significant teachable moments with sound culturally responsive strategy, bidirectional culturally sensitive communication, individual development, and collective action., (© 2024 American Physical Therapy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Yoga is highly sought after by people seeking oncology care, endorsed by clinical practice guidelines, and supported by leading cancer organizations, yet barriers related to access, time, cost, and availability of quality providers remain. Shared medical appointments (SMA), a group healthcare model where patients with similar medical conditions participate in a collective appointment with healthcare providers, are associated with increased access to quality care, patient satisfaction, and clinician satisfaction. We piloted a unique insurance-covered virtual yoga SMA series to assess feasibility and acceptability in a mixed-diagnosis population. In this prospective cohort pilot, a trauma-informed Hanna Somatic Yoga instructor and an integrative medicine physician co-led yoga SMAs via live web-based conferencing. SMA content included conscious self-regulation through mind-body practices including breathing, movement, visualization, meditation, chanting, and guided relaxation. Qualitative and quantitative data were gathered to assess satisfaction with the 88 sessions offered over 33 months. Sixty-nine participants with diverse demographics attended a total of 500 visits. Class attendance ranged from 2-11 participants (mean 6 participants). Participants attended a mean of 7 sessions (range 1-63 sessions), with 63% attending > 1 session. Participants' diagnoses/symptoms included cancer (77%), anxiety/depression (38%), and pain (38%). Preseries, participants reported pain, weakness, neuropathy, lymphedema, insomnia, and fatigue. Postseries survey results suggested improvements in anxiety/fear, pain, fatigue, poor sleep, neuropathy, brain fog, isolation, weakness, inflexibility, and poor balance. Postseries, participants also reported incorporating mindfulness, breathing techniques, somatic skills, weight training, and yoga into their daily routines, with 91% reporting that their goals had been met. Participants appreciated remote delivery, learning new skills, community, and the instructors. This virtual yoga SMA series in a diverse population with mixed diagnoses was feasible, acceptable to participants, and showed promising positive impact. A larger randomized controlled trial with longer follow-up is recommended.

Background: Probiotics are synthetic oral supplements containing live bacterial and fungal species hypothesized to help with various gastrointestinal conditions. However, they can cause infection if the organism spreads outside of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to identify and describe patients who experienced systemic infections caused by probiotic use., Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of pediatric and adult patients at academic medical centers who received probiotics and subsequently developed positive cultures from a sterile site for probiotic-related species. Two individuals completed the chart reviews to determine if the probiotic was the true cause of the infection., Results: Lactobacillus , Bifidobacterium , and Saccharomyces cultures were reviewed, with a total of 71, 8, and 2 cultures isolated from sterile sites for each organism, respectively. Further review revealed 23 Lactobacillus cultures from 13 unique patients who were taking Lactobacillus -containing probiotics. Four patients without gastrointestinal tract compromise were included in the final analysis, including 1 patient whose culture was confirmed as identical to the probiotic. Types of infections included meningitis and bacteremia. Targeted antimicrobial therapy included ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam, with total durations of therapy ranging from 10 to 22 days. No patients had mortality attributed to Lactobacillus infection., Conclusions: Probiotics are not harmless supplements as they come with risk of serious infection as demonstrated in this review. Before use, the risks of probiotics should be considered carefully for each individual patient. Clinicians should consider avoiding probiotics in hospitalized patients, especially those with vascular or extra-ventricular access devices., (Copyright© Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.)

Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services consider the 30-day hospital readmission rate an outcome of care measure; a high rate is associated with high-cost and bed utilization., Purpose: The Division of Vascular Surgery at a large academic medical center implemented a 15-week quality improvement project in the fall of 2022 to reduce readmissions among patients deemed high-risk for readmission and discharged to home., Methods: The discharging provider utilized the "HOSPITAL Score for Readmission" tool to identify patients at high-risk for unplanned 30-day readmission to receive the intervention, which included follow-up with a primary care provider (PCP) within two weeks of hospital discharge to address non-surgical medical conditions that may have been exacerbated during the hospital stay. A hospital based transitional care clinic bridged medical care for identified patients without an established PCP or whose PCP could not accommodate an appointment until PCP assumption of care. Discharging providers included 11 nurse practitioners and 2 surgery residents; each received a one-on-one educational teaching session and a weekly reminder e-mail through week 9., Results: A total of 158 vascular surgery patients (low and high-risk) were discharged home over 15 weeks with 30 patients (19%) having an unplanned readmission within 30-days from discharge. Adherence issues with the intervention among staff allowed for the high-risk group to be divided into those who did not receive the intervention versus those who did. The high-risk patients who did not receive the intervention had a higher readmission rate (30.4%) than the high-risk patients who did receive the intervention (21.4%)., Conclusions: Numerous acute and chronic medical problems were treated at the PCP/transitional care clinic visits, which may have contributed to the reduction in rate of readmissions occurring within 30-days for those patients. Increased usage of the transitional care clinic identified a gap that patients continue to require assistance with establishing care with a PCP and further process change in the future is needed to ensure successful transition for all patients., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Nursing, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Communication and collaboration among health care professionals during bedside rounds improve patient outcomes and nurses' and physicians' satisfaction., Objectives: To determine barriers to nurse-physician communication during bedside rounds and identify opportunities to improve nurse-physician collaboration at an academic medical center., Methods: A survey with Likert-scale and open-ended questions regarding professional attitudes toward nurse-physician communication was administered to 220 nurses and physicians in medical-surgical units to assess perceptions of participation in bedside rounds. After the survey was given, observational data from 1007 bedside rounds were collected via a standardized data collection tool., Results: Nurses and physicians perceived different barriers to including nurses in bedside rounds. Nurses most often cited being unaware that bedside rounds were occurring (38 of 46 nurses [83%]); physicians most often cited nurse unavailability (43 of 52 physicians [83%]). Of 1007 observed rounds, 602 (60%) involved in-person contact of nurses and physicians; 418 (69%) of the 602 included a conversation between the nurse and physician about the nurse's concerns. Of 355 rounds with no in-person or telephone contact between nurses and physicians, the medicine team did not contact the nurse in 284 (80%). Conversations about nurses' concerns occurred more often after physician-initiated contacts (73% of 369 contacts) and nurse-initiated contacts (74% of 93 contacts) than after chance encounters (57% of 140 contacts)., Conclusion: Initiating discussions of care between nurses and physicians and discussing nurses' concerns during bedside rounds have multiple benefits., (©2024 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, a leader in geriatric surgery, was awarded Geriatric Surgery Verification by the American College of Surgeons. This award demonstrates its expertise in meeting the specialized needs of older adults in the perioperative period to optimize their surgical outcomes and experience. Among the program's standards is implementing the geriatric nurse champion role and education in alignment with the Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders (NICHE) practice model. In this month's NICHE column, nurse leaders from Brigham and Women's Hospital describe its path to achieving Geriatric Surgery Verification and implementing the NICHE practice model in the perioperative setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Lung cancer ranks as the third most prevalent cancer in the United States. The use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening significantly reduces mortality from this disease. Unfortunately, Texas lags in completing lung cancer screening (LCS) for high-risk patients, ranking 48th among all states. It is crucial to implement quality improvement (QI) initiatives in Texas. In collaboration with the American Cancer Society, the primary care center (PCC) at our institution led a multidisciplinary QI project aimed at enhancing LCS through LDCT for eligible PCC patients., Methods: The study included patients eligible for screening and who fall into the following categories: established patients with Medicaid, low-income or uninsured established patients, and established patients with either Medicare or commercial insurance. Enhancements to electronic medical records, education for clinical staff and patients, and a coordinated, multidisciplinary effort were implemented., Results: The study revealed a substantial 40.2% improvement in LCS rates., Conclusion: The US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines rely on an accurate history of patient's tobacco use to identify patients eligible for LCS. This QI project achieved success in improving the thoroughness of tobacco use history documentation and surpassed our target for increasing LCS by more than 10%., Competing Interests: The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 National Association for Healthcare Quality.)

Objective: At our 710-bed academic medical center, nine (9) patients sustained injuries during nasogastric (NG) tube insertion attempts over a 16-month period (March 2021-July 2022). No injuries were reported during the comparable period before these events. This increase in reported events prompted an in-depth analysis to determine the root causes and implement a process improvement plan., Methods: Root cause analysis (RCA) of these events failed to identify risk factors or actionable themes. The RCAs demonstrated wide variation in the number of insertion attempts and techniques., Results: A standard process was created to provide team members with guidance for escalation when NG tube placement was difficult., Conclusions: Although the complication rate for NG tube insertion was comparable with the criterion standard for large tertiary care institutions, we focused on minimizing risk and improving outcomes by creating a standard process for NG tube placement., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 National Association for Healthcare Quality.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures: All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated. Disclosure forms are available with this article online.