Search

Background: Dual HIV/syphilis testing may be an acceptable intervention to identify men with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and at risk of HIV acquisition., Objectives: We sought to determine the acceptability, and performance of dual HIV/syphilis testing among men attending voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) services at six public sector facilities in Gauteng., Method: This was a cross-sectional study at VMMC facilities. Men ≥ 18 years were enrolled. The men had (1) a questionnaire administered, (2) on-site dual HIV/syphilis testing with First Response HIV1+2/Syphilis Combo Card Test by routine lay counsellors, and (3) a blood specimen collected for centralised laboratory testing for HIV and syphilis serology. We evaluated pre-test and post-test acceptability and performance compared to serological testing., Results: Of the 679 men analysed (median age 32.1 years), 96.7% of HIV-negative men preferred testing for HIV and syphilis simultaneously. Of the 675 men tested for syphilis, 28 (4.7%) tested positive (past or recent). In the laboratory, 43/609 (7.1%) had syphilis infection detected, with 9/609 (1.5%) having recent syphilis. There was sub-optimal sensitivity for HIV detection (90.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.5% - 93.3%), and for past/recent syphilis (55.8%; 95% CI: 51.9% - 59.8%), improving to 88.9% (95% CI: 86.4% - 91.4%) for recent syphilis. Specificities were > 99% for HIV and syphilis (past or recent). Post-test acceptability was 96.6% and willingness to pay for future testing was 86.1%., Conclusion: Dual HIV/syphilis testing was acceptable but had sub-optimal sensitivity for HIV and syphilis. Syphilis detection was adequate for recent infection., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article., (© 2024. The Authors.)

Monitoring of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) remains critical for ensuring countries attain and sustain the global goals for ending HIV as a public health threat by 2030. On an individual patient level, drug resistance results assist in ensuring unnecessary treatment switches are avoided and subsequent regimens are tailored on a case-by-case basis, should resistance be detected. Although there is a disparity in access to HIVDR testing in high-income countries compared to low- and middle-income countries (LMICS), more LMICs have now included HIVDR testing for individual patient management in some groups of patients. In this review, we describe different strategies for surveillance as well as where HIVDR testing can be implemented for individual patient management. In addition, we briefly review available technologies for HIVDR testing in LMICs, including Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and some point-of-care options. Finally, we describe how South Africa has implemented HIVDR testing in the public sector.

Objective: In 2012, 7 years after the introduction of antiretroviral treatment (ART) in the South African township of Orange Farm, we measured the proportion of HIV-positive people who were virally suppressed, especially among high-risk groups (women 18-29 years and men 25-34 years)., Design: A community-based cross-sectional representative survey was conducted among 3293 men and 3473 women., Methods: Study procedures included a face-to-face interview and collection of blood samples that were tested for HIV, 11 antiretroviral drugs and HIV-viral load., Results: HIV prevalence was 17.0% [95% confidence interval: 15.7-18.3%] among men and 30.1% [28.5-31.6%] among women. Overall, 59.1% [57.4-60.8%] of men and 79.5% [78.2-80.9%] of women had previously been tested for HIV. When controlling for age, circumcised men were more likely to have been tested compared with uncircumcised men (66.1 vs 53.6%; P < 0.001). Among HIV+, 21.0% [17.7-24.6%] of men and 30.5% [27.7-33.3%] of women tested positive for one or more antiretroviral drugs. Using basic calculations, we estimated that, between 2005 and 2012, ART programs prevented between 46 and 63% of AIDS-related deaths in the community. Among antiretroviral-positive, 91.9% [88.7-94.3%] had viral suppression (viral load <400 copies/ml). The proportion of viral suppression among HIV+ was 27.0% [24.3-29.9%] among women and 17.5% [14.4-20.9%] among men. These proportions were lower among the high-risk groups: 15.6% [12.1-19.7%] among women and 8.4% [5.0-13.1%] among men., Conclusion: In Orange Farm, between 2005 and 2012, ART programs were suboptimal and, among those living with HIV, the proportion with viral suppression was still low, especially among the young age groups. However, our study showed that, in reality, antiretroviral drugs are highly effective in viral suppression at an individual level.

Background: The optimum collection procedure for the evaluation of HIV-1 burden in ulcer secretions has not been well defined., Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare ulcer swabs and ulcer lavages for the detection and quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in genital ulcers., Study Design: A convenience sample of the first 84 HIV-positive participants in a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial of acyclovir episodic treatment among men with genital ulcer disease were included in this evaluation. At baseline, participants were screened for HIV, syphilis and HSV-2 by serology and for ulcer etiology by PCR. Ulcer specimens were collected by using (1) a non-traumatic washing procedure with 10ml of PBS, and (2) sterile dry swabs. Ulcer samples were tested with HIV-1 Amplicor 1.5 Ultra Sensitive Assay with a lower threshold of 50 copies/ml., Results: Of ulcer samples 35 (41.7%) had HIV detected by ulcer lavage and 32 (38.1%) by swabs (p=0.68). Overall, 45 (53.6%) were positive by one or both methods. The overall proportion of agreement was 73% (61/84). The chance-corrected proportion of agreement was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.65) as estimated by the Kappa statistic. The log mean viral load from lavages (1.49log(10) copies/ml, 95% CI: 1.17-1.81) did not differ significantly from that of swabs (1.41log(10) copies/ml, 95% CI: 1.16-1.71) (p=0.29) with a mean difference of 0.08log copies/ml (SD 0.96)., Conclusion: Ulcer lavage and ulcer swab performed in moderate agreement in the detection and quantitation of HIV RNA from ulcer specimens.