Search

Introduction: Several meta-analyses (MAs) of the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) exist. They include different types of populations, Daratumumab regimens, and outcomes. Moreover, there is a wide variation in methodological quality and risk of bias., Objective: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of MAs to summarize the literature on the efficacy and safety profile of daratumumab use in RRMM, and also provide an assessment of the quality and risk of bias of the MAs if sufficient data is available., Methods: The literature databases Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched since inception. The quality of methodology was assessed by the AMSTAR-2 tool, and the risk of bias was assessed by the ROBIS tool., Results: Eight MAs were included in the SR. Most studies reported ORR and CR improvement by adding daratumumab to the chemotherapy regimen. Five MAs reported improvement in PFS in daratumumab-based regimens compared to non- daratumumab-based regimens. Only two MAs reported molecular response, favoring daratumumab. Dara was associated with adverse drug events (ADEs), including pneumonia and diarrhea. Conflicting evidence regarding hematological ADEs association with daratumumab exists. The overall quality of the studies is poor, but the MAs had a low risk of bias overall., Conclusion: Despite including low-quality MAs, this SR provides a summary that simplifies clinicians' access to efficacy and safety outcomes of daratumumab in RRMM patients. Future studies are required to reduce the uncertainty and produce higher-quality Mas, particularly regarding daratumumab's safety., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a lethal condition resulting from misfolded immunoglobulin ALs produced by clonal CD38-positive plasma cells. Treatment with daratumumab, an anti-human CD38 monoclonal antibody, led to higher frequencies of complete hematologic response and better clinical outcomes compared with conventional treatment. This study sought to evaluate the survival benefit of daratumumab-containing regimens in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis., Methods and Results: We examined 65 consecutive patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis (mean age: 67.2 ± 10.4 years, male: 69 %) who underwent chemotherapy. We divided patients into a daratumumab group, which used daratumumab-containing regimens before second-line treatment (n = 32), and a conventional treatment group (n = 33). Compared with the conventional treatment group, the daratumumab group tended to be older, but there were no significant differences between groups in biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters. A total of 26 patients (40 %) died (median follow-up duration: 395 days). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the daratumumab group had significantly lower mortality compared with the conventional treatment group (p = 0.04; log-rank test). Cox hazard analysis revealed that use of daratumumab-containing regimens was associated with lower mortality after adjustment for the revised Mayo staging of AL amyloidosis (hazard ratio: 0.32; 95 % confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.85; p = 0.02)., Conclusion: Daratumumab-containing regimens may be associated with improved survival in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The development of newer agents, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), has significantly improved overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the treatment of older patients with RRMM who are transplant-ineligible remains challenging., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated OS in 78 transplant-ineligible patients with RRMM who were aged ≥ 65 years and treated at our institution between February 2012 and November 2023., Results: Unadjusted OS was significantly longer in the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group (i.e., those previously treated with daratumumab and receiving isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone because of disease progression during treatment with daratumumab [ n = 6], daratumumab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone [ n = 9], or isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone without daratumumab-exposure [ n = 14]) than in the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group (no exposure to daratumumab or isatuximab [ n = 49]) ( p < 0.001). To address potential confounder factors associated with use or nonuse of anti-CD38 mAbs, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) using age, sex, performance status, and Geriatric 8 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scores. PSM identified 14 subjects from the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group with baseline characteristics similar to those of 14 subjects from the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group. After PSM, the adjusted OS was significantly longer in the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group than in the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group ( p < 0.001)., Conclusion: These findings provide insights into the optimal use of anti-CD38 mAbs in patients with RRMM who are transplant-ineligible and aged ≥65 years and on candidates who are appropriate for novel approaches, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell or bispecific T-cell engager therapy.

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of adding daratumumab to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (KdD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)., Materials and Methods: A Markov model was established to estimate health and economic outcomes of carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) with or without daratumumab for RRMM patients over a lifetime horizon. The patients and intervention of the two arms were modeled according to the CANDOR trial. Costs were collected from the Chinese health system perspective. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of our conclusions., Results: Compared with the Kd arm, KdD achieved an additional 0.537 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $138,084, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) of $257,319 per QALY. Uncertainty analyses revealed that the model is robust to all the input parameters., Conclusion: From the Chinese healthcare system perspective, adding daratumumab to the Kd regimen for patients with RRMM appears to lack cost-effectiveness. Exploring alternative avenues such as negotiating for a more favorable price or introducing a financial assistance program dedicated to daratumumab and/or carfilzomib could prove to be an effective strategy in enhancing accessibility of this combination., Competing Interests: All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Yi et al.)

Daratumumab and bortezomib, the first-line drugs for AL amyloidosis, typically yield a complete hematologic response (CHR) rate of nearly 60% when used in combinations. An early achievement of CHR is crucial in amyloidosis. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between dFLC (the difference between free light chain) reduction by Day 7 in Cycle 1 (C1D7) and CHR, organ response, and survival in 48 newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients receiving daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone. The CHR rate within six months was 66.7%. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve curve analysis, we predicted CHR based on a dFLC reduction in C1D7 (67.0% change, optimal sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 81.3%). We introduce the novel concept of "rapid hematologic dFLC response", defined as a reduction in dFLC levels ≥ 67% in C1D7. The CHR rate in rapid responders' groups was higher than that in slow responders' group (90.3% vs. 23.5%, P<0.01). After a median follow-up of 19 months (range: 0.3-57), the renal response rate in rapid responders was higher than that in slow responders (72.0% vs. 27.5%, P = 0.025). The median major organ deterioration event-free survival in the rapid responders' group (not reached) was significantly superior to that in the slow responders' group (19 m, 95% CI: 1.79-23.14 m, P = 0.048). In conclusion, early dFLC reduction in C1D7 indicates a high possibility of CHR and organ response and may allow for early modification of therapy in selected patients., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest All authors declare no potential conflict of interest. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Daratumumab (Dara) is the first monoclonal antibody introduced into clinical practice to treat multiple myeloma (MM). It currently forms the backbone of therapy regimens in both newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (RR) patients. However, previous reports indicated an increased risk of infectious complications (ICs) during Dara-based treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine the profile of ICs in MM patients treated with Dara-based regimens and establish predictors of their occurrence., Methods: This retrospective, real-life study included MM patients treated with Dara-based regimens between July 2019 and March 2024 at our institution. Infectious events were evaluated using the Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0., Results: The study group consisted of a total of 139 patients, including 49 NDMM and 90 RRMM. In the RR setting, the majority (60.0%) of patients received the Dara, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) regimen, whereas ND patients were predominantly (98%) treated with the Dara, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVTd) regimen. Overall, 55 patients (39.6%) experienced ICs. The most common IC was pneumonia (37.5%), followed by upper respiratory tract infections (26.8%). Finally, twenty-five patients had severe ICs (grade ≥ 3) and required hospitalization, and eight patients died due to ICs. In the final multivariable model adjusted for setting (ND/RR) and age, hemoglobin level (OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.96, p = 0.0037), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) >1 (OR 4.46, 95% CI: 1.63-12.26, p = 0.0037) were significant factors influencing severe IC occurrence. Additionally, we developed predictive models using the J48 decision tree, gradient boosting, and random forest algorithms. After conducting 10-fold cross-validation, these models demonstrated strong performance in predicting the occurrence of pneumonia during treatment with daratumumab-based regimens., Conclusions: Simple clinical and laboratory assessments, including hemoglobin level and ECOG scale, can be valuable in identifying patients vulnerable to infections during Dara-based regimens, facilitating personalized prophylactic strategies.

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) with pulmonary extramedullary disease is rare and usually associated with poor prognosis, and no data on daratumumab-based regimens have been reported yet., Case Presentation: Here, a 64-year-old man with pulmonary plasmacytoma received daratumumab-based regimens and has achieved a very good partial response with lung mass disappearance and overall survival of 16 months. He did not receive autologous stem cell transplantation because of several comorbidities, such as severe drug-induced neuropathy and JAK2-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasm with marked splenomegaly., Conclusions: We showed the efficacy of daratumumab in combination with targeted therapies for the treatment of pulmonary MM., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd) and bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) are the only preferred treatment regimens for patients with transplant-ineligible (TIE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). As there are no randomized head-to-head studies of DRd versus VRd, this analysis aimed to compare real-world time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) or death in this population., Methods: Patients with NDMM who received front-line (FL) DRd or VRd were identified from the Acentrus database (January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2023). Those with a record of a stem cell transplant or aged < 65 years were excluded to limit analysis to the TIE population. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. A doubly robust Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare TTNT or death between cohorts., Results: A total of 149 and 494 patients who initiated DRd and VRd, respectively, were identified. After weighting (weighted N DRd  = 302, weighted N VRd  = 341), cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Of these, 98 (32.4%) DRd and 175 (51.2%) VRd patients either received a subsequent line of therapy or died, with a median TTNT or death of 37.8 months in the DRd cohort and 18.7 months in the VRd cohort (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.81; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Treatment of TIE NDMM patients with DRd led to a significantly longer TTNT or death compared to VRd, evidenced by a 42% risk reduction, supporting the effectiveness of DRd over VRd as FL treatment in this patient population., (© 2024 Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The immunosuppressive treatment of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) in patients with intolerance or refractoriness to the B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab remains debated. Daratumumab, a plasma cell-directed monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, represents a therapeutic option, but data are scarce. The French Thrombotic Microangiopathies Reference Center conducted a nationwide survey on iTTP patients treated with daratumumab. Nine episodes from seven patients were identified. Treatment was administered for A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase with ThromboSpondin-1 motifs, 13th member (ADAMTS13) relapses while patients were otherwise in clinical response (N = 8), or during the acute phase of the disease following rituximab intolerance (N = 1). Patients have received a median of three previous therapeutic lines. ADAMTS13 activity improved in eight cases following daratumumab administration, including three cases where ADAMTS13 normalized. ADAMTS13 relapses occurred in three patients; in two cases, retreatment with daratumumab was successful. Median ADAMTS13 relapse-free survival was not reached; 12-month ADAMTS13 relapse-free survival was 56%. Daratumumab-related adverse events occurred in five cases and were non-severe infusion-related reactions in all cases. These results suggest that daratumumab may be an effective treatment option for iTTP patients with intolerance or refractoriness to rituximab., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) is a key target on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This multi-centre, Phase 1, single-agent study (NCT04000282) investigated SAR442085, a novel fragment crystallisable (Fc)-modified anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), with enhanced affinity towards Fc-gamma receptor on effector cells in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM., Methods: This study comprised two parts: Part-A (dose-escalation involving anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated and naïve patients) and Part-B (dose expansion). Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D)., Results: Thirty-seven heavily pre-treated patients were treated in Part A. Part-B (dose-expansion) was not studied. Seven dose-limiting toxicities were reported at DL3, DL5, DL6, and DL7. RP2D was determined to be 5-7·5 mg/kg. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 70·3% (26/37) patients. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 48·6% (18/37). Overall response rate was 70% in anti-CD38 mAb naïve and 4% in anti-CD38 pre-treated patients, with a median progression-free survival of 7·62 (95%CI: 2·858; not calculable) months and 2·79 (95%CI: 1·150; 4·172) months and, respectively., Conclusions: The efficacy of SAR442085 was promising in anti-CD38 mAb naïve patients but did not extend to the larger cohort of anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated patients. This observation, along with transient high-grade thrombocytopenia, could potentially limit its clinical use., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare malignancy with poor overall survival (OS). Recently, its diagnostic criteria were revised by lowering the threshold of circulating plasma cells from ≥ 20% to ≥ 5%., Methods: Between 2010 and 2024, patients with primary PCL (pPCL) and secondary PCL (sPCL) were identified at a tertiary center. We retrospectively analyzed baseline characteristics, treatment, and survival in months (m)., Results: We identified 30 patients with pPCL and 29 patients with sPCL. The median time to sPCL in patients who received Daratumumab (Dara)-containing regimens for multiple myeloma was 46.8m compared with 12.3m in patients who did not (P=0.007). Of the whole cohort, 51.9% received an induction regimen with novel agents without chemotherapy. Of the evaluable patients with pPCL and sPCL, 82.1% (23/28) and 64.7% (11/17) achieved partial response or better respectively. Median progression free survival was significantly worse in patients with sPCL than pPCL (2.2 vs. 38.3 months; HR 0.16; 95% CI (0.07-0.35), P < .001). Median OS was also worse in patients with sPCL compared with pPCL (3.1 months vs. NR [not reached]; HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.04-0.23, P < .001). The median post-SCT survival for patients with pPCL was NR compared with 6.7m for patients with sPCL (HR 0.17; 95% CI (0.03-0.83), P = .03). Dara-refractory status was associated with worse OS (HR 5.63; 95% CI (2.75-11.51), P < .0001)., Conclusion: Outcomes of pPCL are improving but remain dismal for sPCL. We explored the role of novel agents, especially Dara, in the treatment of PCL. More prospective trials are needed to improve its outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure K.S., F.A., S.P., C.W, H.Y., and K.A declare no competing conflicts of interest. J.H. is on the data safety and monitoring board for Janssen, the advisory board for Targeted Oncology, Angitia, Prothena, Sebia, Regeneron, and has given talks at Beigene, Targeted Oncology, Integrity Continuing Education, Inc, and Clinical Care Options., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

What Is This Summary About?: This summary describes the final analysis of the GRIFFIN study. In this study, participants were newly diagnosed with a type of blood and bone marrow cancer called multiple myeloma, had never received any treatment, and were able to undergo an autologous stem cell transplant. The GRIFFIN study looked at adding the drug daratumumab (D) to a combination of standard treatments called RVd (lenalidomide [R], bortezomib [V], and dexamethasone [d]) during the treatment phases induction and consolidation, followed by daratumumab and lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance. Participants also received an autologous stem cell transplant to further help reduce multiple myeloma. The GRIFFIN study looked at whether D-RVd followed by D-R maintenance was better at killing multiple myeloma cells compared with RVd on its own followed by R maintenance on its own, and if treatments were safe. This summary also describes results from 2 other GRIFFIN publications: one that looked at participants with certain multiple myeloma characteristics or demographic factors that are associated with worse outcomes, and another that looked at how treatments impacted the participants' quality of life., What Were the Results?: At the time of the final analysis of GRIFFIN, participants who were treated with D-RVd followed by D-R maintenance had very low (undetectable) levels of multiple myeloma cells and multiple myeloma markers (biological signs) and were more likely to be alive without the multiple myeloma getting worse or coming back compared with participants who received standard RVd treatment followed by R maintenance. There was also a pattern of similar benefits achieved by participants who were at risk for worse outcomes. Additionally, participants who received D-RVd treatment followed by D-R maintenance reported less pain, less fatigue (extreme tiredness), and greater improvements in their ability to conduct daily physical activities. While some side effects (unwanted or unexpected effects of treatment) were higher with D-RVd, side effects in both groups were as expected, and adding daratumumab did not reduce a participant's ability to handle treatment., What Do the Results of the Study Mean?: Results of the GRIFFIN study showed that D-RVd treatment followed by D-R maintenance was better at treating multiple myeloma than the standard treatment of RVd followed by R maintenance in adults with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma who were able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant, with no unexpected side effects of treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02874742 (GRIFFIN) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Singapore leads Southeast Asia in the routine use of daratumumab for multiple myeloma and other plasma cell dyscrasias. This retrospective review analyzed 112 patients who received daratumumab between 2012 and 2020. Tolerability, and efficacy based on prior lines (PL) of therapy, cytogenetic risk group, and the presence of renal impairment were presented. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 26.8% of patients. Grades 1 and 2 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were observed in 14.3% and 33.9% of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, there was no significant difference in overall response rates (ORR) (86% versus 76.3%, p = 0.082) or depth of response (≥ complete response (CR), 35.1% versus 28.9%, p = 0.469) between myeloma patients with and without renal dysfunction. Newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients had an ORR of 92% and 76.3%, and a ≥ VGPR (very good partial response) rate of 80% and 55.3%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was better for patients with 0/1 PL compared to ≥ 2 PLs (19.8 versus 6.2 months, p < 0.001), with a deeper response (≥ CR, 38.5% versus 16.7%, p = 0.033). Forty-six and a half percentage of patients had high-risk FISH abnormalities, and those with 0/1 PL had a significantly better ORR than those with ≥ 2 PLs (83.3% vsersus 47.1%, p = 0.022), achieving an ORR similar to that of the general cohort (80.2%, p = 0.905). In conclusion, positioning daratumumab in earlier lines of therapy leads to better outcomes and may mitigate the impact of high-risk FISH abnormalities., Competing Interests: All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Objectives: Paediatric Burkitt's lymphoma (pBL) is the most common childhood non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma. Despite the encouraging survival rates for most children, treating cases with relapse/resistance to current therapies remains challenging. CD38 is a transmembrane protein highly expressed in pBL. This study investigates the effectiveness of CD38-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), daratumumab and isatuximab, in impairing crucial cellular processes and survival pathways in pBL malignant cells., Methods: In silico analyses of patient samples, combined with in vitro experiments using the Ramos cell line, were conducted to assess the impact of daratumumab and isatuximab on cellular proliferation, apoptosis and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway., Results: Isatuximab was found to be more effective than daratumumab in disrupting B-cell receptor signalling, reducing cellular proliferation and inducing apoptosis. Additionally, isatuximab caused a significant impairment of the PI3K pathway and induced metabolic reprogramming in pBL cells. The study also revealed a correlation between CD38 and MYC expression levels in pBL patient samples, suggesting CD38 involvement in key oncogenic processes., Conclusion: The study emphasises the therapeutic potential of CD38-targeting mAbs, particularly isatuximab, in pBL., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be considered as a potential conflict of interest. Cartoon figures were created with Biorender.com., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical & Translational Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology, Inc.)

Introduction: Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) is a chronic glomerular disease caused by monoclonal gammopathy. IgG (mainly IgG3) is the most commonly involved isotype of PGNMID. Here we illustrated a novel medication regimen for the rare variant of PGNMID with deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain only (PGNMID-LC). Daratumumab has been proved effective in the treatment of plasma cell myeloma while its effect for PGNMID-LC has rarely been reported., Methods: A daratumumab combination therapy (D-VCd regimen, specifically are daratumumab + dexamethasone + bortezomib + cyclophosphamide) was adopted to treat a patient diagnosed with PGNMID-LC., Results: The utility of D-VCd regimen showed a favorable effect in this patient. After the fixed course, his clinical symptom, laboratory parameters, neoplastic plasma cells clonity all restored to normal range, and no obvious disease progression was observed throughout the treatment. After a follow up of 14 months, no significant renal or hematological disease progression has been observed., Conclusion: This case underscores the utility of D-VCd regimen in treatment of PGNMID-LC, and it's inferred that daratumumab regimen has clinical effects in the disease primarily through targeting tumor clonity. However, data on the use of daratumumab (either in monotherapy or in combination) in clinical trials of PGNMID-LC is currently so limited that that more experiments are needed to support the inference., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wang, Lv, Xiao, Liu, Du and Zhong.)

The aim of this study is to analyze the profile of patients receiving daratumumab and their presentation to the transfusion laboratory by looking at the different pre-transfusion policies and the risk of erythrocyte alloimmunization. Patients receiving daratumumab from 2018 to 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into two groups: Group I, presented before administration of daratumumab, and Group II, presented after drug administration. Appropriate strategies were applied to mitigate the drug interference, and the transfusion outcome was analyzed by following up with the patients for six months. A total of 48 patients were studied. The antibody screen was negative in patients who presented before the administration of daratumumab (n = 35). Extended phenotyping was done for 31 patients. Blood group genotyping was done for 4 patients. The patients who presented after daratumumab administration (n = 13) had a positive antibody screen that became negative with dithiothreitol-treated cells. A total of 261 red cell units were transfused to these patients (mean 5.55 units per patient). None of the patients developed antibodies during the follow-up period. The transfusion services must frame policies and protocols to mitigate drug interference. Good communication between transfusion services and clinical hematologists is a must to ensure safe transfusions., Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-024-01763-5., (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 2024.)

The recurrence of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after kidney transplantation is associated with a high graft loss rate with standard treatments based on plasmapheresis with/without rituximab. We present 2 consecutive cases of nongenetic early severe recurrent FSGS refractory to rituximab and anti-interleukin 1 treatment and with a partial response to plasmapheresis. Case 1 was a 22-year-old man who was rescue-treated for recurrence 36 weeks after transplantation with obinutuzumab (1000 mg/1.73 m 2 , 1 dose) and daratumumab (18 mg/kg each dose, 8 doses), resulting in plasmapheresis discontinuation and a drop of proteinuria from 29 to 2.3 g/d. Proteinuria increased with circulating CD38 + plasma cells and responded to an additional daratumumab dose. Currently, the proteinuria is 1.8 g/d, 14.5 months after discontinuing plasmapheresis and starting obinutuzumab and daratumumab therapy. Case 2 was a 15-year-old girl who was plasmapheresis dependent with 2 g/d proteinuria 82 weeks after transplantation, with a Tesio catheter in the right jugular vein as the only possible vascular access. After treatment with obinutuzumab and daratumumab (1 dose each), she achieved stable complete remission (0.3 g/d proteinuria) with persistent plasmapheresis discontinuation. These cases suggest the potential of combining obinutuzumab with daratumumab for the treatment of recurrent FSGS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described in the American Journal of Transplantation., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer in the bone marrow. The treatment of MM has developed significantly during the last 20 years, which has resulted in increased survival. Daratumumab is the first CD38 antibody approved for the treatment of MM. It has improved the treatment of MM even further. This is an evaluation of the modes of action of daratumumab and a description of the development of resistance with a focus on inhibitory checkpoint receptors on CD8 + T-cells, complement activation and extracellular vesicles., (© 2024 The Author(s). Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).)

Background: The roles of Lenalidomide (Len) and Daratumumab (Dara) in multiple myeloma treatment are well-established, yet their influences on hematopoietic stem cell harvesting and reconstitution remain disputed., Methods: We conducted a systematic database review to identify cohort studies or RCTs evaluating the effect of the use of Len or Dara on hematopoietic stem cell collection and peripheral blood count recovery in multiple myeloma patients. Effects on hematopoietic collection or reconstitution were estimated by comparing standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences (MD), or median differences., Results: Eighteen relevant studies were identified, summarizing mobilization results. For Len, data from 13 studies were summarized, including total CD34+ cell yield, collection failure rate, and time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Results indicated that Len exposure led to decreased stem cell collection [SMD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.34, -0.12)]. However, collection failure (<2×106) could be mitigated by plerixafor [OR=2.14, 95% CI (0.96, 4.77)]. For Dara, two RCTs and three cohort studies were included, showing that Dara exposure resulted in a reduction in total stem cells even with optimized plerixafor mobilization [SMD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.26, -0.23)], and delayed platelet engraftment recovery [MD=1.20, 95% CI (0.73, 1.66)]., Conclusions: Our meta-analysis offers a comprehensive view of Len and Dara's impacts on hematopoietic stem cell collection and reconstitution in multiple myeloma. Len usage could lead to reduced stem cell collection, counteracted by plerixafor mobilization. Dara usage could result in diminished stem cell collection and delayed platelet engraftment., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: This real-life study aimed to investigate the possible impact of D-VTd induction therapy on hematopoietic engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT)., Methods: Sixty consecutive NDMM patients received four cycles of induction therapy with D-VTd. The conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m 2 . These patients were compared with a historical control group of 80 patients who received four cycles of VTd as induction therapy., Results: The median days to reach neutrophil and platelet engraftment significantly differed between patients treated with D-VTd (11 and 13 days, respectively) and VTd (10 and 12 days). Univariate Cox analyses show that patients treated with D-VTd had a hazard ratio of neutrophil engraftment that was 42% significantly lower than those in the VTd arm (HR: 0.58, p = 0.002), and a multivariate model confirmed this result. Patients treated with D-VTd developed FN more frequently. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions revealed an association between D-VTd and FN. Delayed engraftment did not correlate with more extended hospitalization. No patients died in the first six months after transplantation., Conclusions: Our real-life study showed that a four-drug induction therapy containing DARA does not impact transplant safety outcomes.

Real-world evidence on the impact of monoclonal antibodies as first-line treatment in Spain is limited. This observational, retrospective and prospective, multicenter, descriptive study included 117 transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TIE-NDMM) patients divided into Group A, who received no daratumumab standard regimens, and the DVMP group (daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone treatment). More than 90% of the patients in Group A received bortezomib, lenalidomide, or a combination of them. The median follow-up time for Group A was 38.2 months in comparison to 25.8 months for the DVMP group ( p < 0.0001). The rate of DVMP patients that experienced disease progression or death from any cause was 36.8%, compared to 67.3% of Group A patients at 36 months of follow-up. The DVMP group had a higher 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (52.9% vs. 31.7%). During the retrospective period, 73.0% of patients reported adverse drug reactions, while in the prospective period, 40.5% experienced adverse events, with no clinical differences between groups. The study supports the use of daratumumab regimens in frontline therapy based on real-world data. The findings provide valuable insights into the clinical outcomes of daratumumab therapy, which can help physicians make informed decisions regarding the optimal treatment approach for this patient population.

Objectives: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody against CD38, is increasingly used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, other hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Little is known about its CNS toxicity. We present a case of a patient with POEMS syndrome (syndrome of polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy and skin changes) who developed an acute leukoencephalopathy shortly after initiation of therapy with daratumumab., Methods: Case report following the CARE case report guidelines., Results: The patient presented with symptoms of headache and diffuse worsening of a pre-existing tetraparesis. MRI showed a rapidly progressive leukoencephalopathy. Extensive diagnostic evaluation revealed no specific cause, suggesting the leukoencephalopathy to be caused by daratumumab., Discussion: Our report highlights a probably rare, but clinically significant adverse effect of daratumumab and underlines the necessity of raised vigilance for neurological side effects in patients treated with daratumumab., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Steinegger, Nierobisch, De Vere-Tyndall, Schreiner, Roth, Kappos, Kana and Herwerth.)

Introduction: Anti-CD38 therapeutic modalities (e.g., daratumumab) can impede classical CD38 and CD138 gating use for plasma cell (PC) detection in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with minimal residual disease (MRD). We assessed the applicability of CD229, CD269, and interferon regulatory factor (IRF-4) for PC detection in MM MRD patients., Methods: Bone marrow samples were collected from patients with MM. Through multiparameter flow cytometry, we evaluated the suitability of CD229, CD269, and IRF-4 for distinguishing PCs from other hematopoietic cells and compared their expression pattern on normal PCs (nPCs) and aberrant PCs (aPCs). We also assessed IRF-4 expression stability after sample storage under different conditions. A 10-color MRD antibody panel was used to determine whether IRF-4 is an alternative primary PC-gating marker for MM MRD assessment., Results: IRF-4 was expressed specifically on all PCs; its mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was highest on PCs among all hematopoietic cells. This MFI did not decrease even after sample storage at 4°C or 25°C for 72 h. In all 42 MRD assessment samples, except for samples (n = 10) with no PCs, the use of IRF-4 enabled accurate nPC (n = 12), aPC (n = 13), and nPC + aPC (n = 7) identification. Even samples from daratumumab-treated patients had high IRF-4 MFI, with no difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment (n = 7; p = 0.610)., Conclusions: IRF-4 demonstrates high MFI on PCs, and it is not expressed on other leukocytes. In MM patients with MRD, daratumumab treatment does not affect IRF-4 expression. IRF-4 is a promising marker for PC identification in MRD assessment of MM patients undergoing anti-CD38 therapy., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We previously reported the structure, affinity, and anticancer activity of a bivalent bispecific natural killer cell engager (BiKE) composed of one anti-CD16a VHH and one anti-HER2 VHH fused via a linker. In this study, we explored the engineering of a tetravalent BiKE by fusing two anti-CD16a and two anti-HER2 VHHs in tandem, using bivalent BiKE as a template. The tetravalent BiKE was genetically engineered, and its tertiary structure was predicted using in silico modeling. The antigen binding and affinity of the tetravalent BiKE were assessed using ELISA, flow cytometry, and biolayer interferometry. The ability of the BiKEs to kill cancer cells was evaluated through classical and residual antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays. Additionally, we investigated the potential for NK cell fratricide via CD16a-CD16a crosslinking. Our results revealed that the tetravalent BiKE exhibited at least 100-fold higher affinity toward its target antigens compared to its bivalent counterpart. The residual ADCC assay indicated that the tetravalent BiKE was more effective in killing cancer cells than the bivalent BiKE, attributable to its lower K off value, which prolonged its binding to NK cell surfaces. Fratricide assays demonstrated that neither the bivalent nor the tetravalent BiKE mediated fratricide. Notably, our findings showed that daratumumab-induced NK fratricide was restricted to CD38-CD38 crosslinking and was not related to ADCC via CD16a-CD38 crosslinking. This study is the first in the literature to show the successful engineering of a tetravalent immune cell engager composed of tandem VHH units, which achieves high affinity and anticancer activity without mediating fratricide.

Purpose: To provide real-world data on patient perceptions and experiences with subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) daratumumab., Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional, mixed-method (qualitative/quantitative) survey conducted in France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom involving multiple myeloma (MM) patients who switched from IV to SC daratumumab in the last 12 months (qualitative phase) or 24 months (quantitative phase [26 months in the UK]) prior to enrollment in the study., Results: Nine patients (mean age 65 years) participated in the qualitative phase and 113 patients (mean age 65.1 years) in the quantitative phase. Qualitative study results provided insights for the quantitative study and highlighted the benefits of switching from daratumumab IV to daratumumab SC as an improvement and a satisfactory change in patients' treatment journey. Quantitative survey showed that patients were significantly less anxious, stressed and nervous before SC injections than IV infusions (mean score: 1.3, 1.1, 1.4 versus 2.1, 2.0, 2.0 respectively, p<0.001), and significantly more reassured, ready/well-prepared, usual self and relieved (mean score: 3.8, 4.3, 3.7, 3.6 versus 3.0, 3.6, 3.1, 3.0 respectively, p<0.001). Immediately after SC first injection, 96.5% patients were feeling well or very well versus 77.9% immediately after IV first infusion (p<0.001). 97.3% patients were satisfied with their SC treatment versus 89.4% for the IV injection (p<0.001). Patients spent significantly less time in hospital for an SC injection of daratumumab than for an IV infusion, 1.5 hours and 5.0 hours respectively (p<0.001). In the UK, the differences between the two administration forms were less visible, likely because of confounding factors including a longer time passed since the switch from the IV to the SC form and administration of the survey., Conclusion: In line with results from other studies, the SC form of daratumumab had less impact on patients' emotional burden than the IV form., Competing Interests: Julien Thevenon, Wafae Iraqi and Valeria Magarotto are employees/ shareholders of Janssen. Mrs Valeria Magarotto reports being an employee of Johnson and Johnson outside the submitted work. Xavier Guillaume, Dahbia Horchi, Bleuenn Rault, Marjorie Leclerc and Claire Graziani Taugeron are employees of Oracle France. Kate Morgan and Silene Ten Seldam are employees of Myeloma Patient Europe (MPE) which receives funding from the following sponsors: AbbVie, Amgen, Alexion, BeiGene, Binding Site, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Stemline Therapeutics, Takeda, Sebia, Prothena, SkylineDx, Sandoz. Kate Morgan has been a member of the Janssen Global MM Collaboration Council since 2021. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Magarotto et al.)

Background: Daratumumab-hyaluronidase-fihj (Dara-SQ) is frequently used in the treatment of plasma cell disorders and is associated with improved outcomes. Dara-SQ was shown to be non-inferior to intravenous daratumumab (Dara-IV) in efficacy, safety, and associated with fewer administration-related reactions (ARRs). Despite the lower ARR risk with Dara-SQ, package labeling still recommends indefinite premedication. In this study, we investigated the safety of premedication discontinuation after one cycle of Dara-SQ., Materials and Methods: This pre-post interventional quality improvement study included all patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with multiple myeloma or light chain (AL) amyloidosis who received at least one dose of Dara-SQ. Patients in Arm 1 received Dara-SQ per package labeling, while patients in Arm 2 had premedication omitted (excluding dexamethasone) after cycle 1. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ARR after cycle 1. Overall ARR rate and therapy time saved were also evaluated., Results: A total of 102 patients (63 in Arm 1 and 39 in Arm 2) were included. There were zero reactions in either arm after cycle 1 across 1479 Dara-SQ doses administered over a 30-month period with or without premedication omission. The overall ARR rate was 2.9% (3/102), which all occurred prior to premedication omission. Therapy timed saved from premedication omission was 194 hours in a 6-month period, equating to approximately $140 000 USD., Conclusion: ARRs to Dara-SQ were rare, mild, and occurred during cycle 1 prior to premedication omission. Omission of noncorticosteroid premedication is safe, feasible, and carries substantial time and cost savings for patients and infusion centers., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

The superiority and tolerability of daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) was previously described in the global phase 3 ALCYONE study. The primary analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS study further demonstrated the superiority and tolerability of D-VMP (n = 144) versus VMP (n = 71) in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM. The current analysis describes the final efficacy and safety outcomes for D-VMP versus VMP in OCTANS, with a follow-up of > 3 years. D-VMP demonstrated a benefit versus VMP with regard to the rate of very good partial response or better (80.1% vs. 47.3%), median progression-free survival (38.7 vs. 19.2 months), median time to next treatment (46.8 vs. 20.6 months), rate of complete response or better (46.6% vs. 18.9%), median duration of response (41.3 vs. 18.5 months), achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (40.4% vs. 10.8%), and sustained MRD negativity for ≥ 12 months (24.7% vs. 1.4%) and ≥ 18 months (15.1% vs. 1.4%). Median progression-free survival was longer among patients who achieved MRD negativity and sustained MRD negativity. The progression-free survival benefit observed with D-VMP was preserved across most clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetics. No new safety concerns were identified with extended follow-up. This final analysis of OCTANS continues to demonstrate a clinical benefit for D-VMP versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM, consistent with the global ALCYONE study, and supports the use of daratumumab combinations in this population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03217812 submitted July 13, 2017., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In Australia, bortezomib-based induction (V-IND) is used in >90% of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Four cycles of V-IND with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone are available via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients who demonstrate suboptimal response or who are refractory to V-IND demonstrate inferior survival, representing a subgroup of MM where an unmet need persists. We evaluated an early, response-adapted approach in these patients by switching to an intensive sequential therapeutic strategy incorporating daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone-based (DRd) salvage, high-dose melphalan ASCT followed by DRd consolidation and R maintenance. The overall response rate following four cycles of DRd salvage was 72% (95% credible interval: 57.9-82.4); prespecified, dual, Bayesian proof-of-concept criteria were met. Euro-flow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was 46% in the intention-to-treat population and 79% in the evaluable population following 12 cycles of DRd consolidation. At the 24-month follow-up, median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. DRd salvage was well tolerated with grade 3 and 4 events reported in 24% and 8% respectively. Response-adapted DRd combined with ASCT achieves high rates of MRD negativity and durable disease control in this functional high-risk group., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Daratumumab's incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara., Methods: Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis., Results: Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections., Conclusion: These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure.

TEMPI syndrome is a rare, acquired disorder with multisystemic manifestations. It is classified as a plasma cell disorder and is characterized by telangiectasias, erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections and intrapulmonary shunt. Even though TEMPI's pathophysiology remains elusive, it responds to anti-myeloma therapy indicating that the monoclonal protein or clone plays a key role. We present a challenging case of a 73-year-old man with erythrocytosis and deteriorating renal function with nephrotic-range proteinuria in whom after extensive work up, the diagnosis of TEMPI syndrome was made. He was received treatment with daratumumab-bortezomib-cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) and achieved a hematological and clinical response. We also report preliminary data on a multiplex assay for cytokines and growth factors for two patients with TEMPI syndrome and note lower levels for non-specific innate immunity related cytokines. A direct link between renal impairment and TEMPI syndrome is not currently established; cytokine deregulation could potentially be involved in the ischemic changes observed in the renal biopsy of our patient., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Daratumumab-treated myeloma patients may face increased seasonal influenza risk due to weakened postvaccination immune responses, especially with daratumumab treatment. We aimed to assess humoral responses to boosted influenza vaccination in daratumumab-treated or -untreated patients., Methods: In a single-center study, we evaluated humoral responses (hemagglutination-inhibition assay) one month following a two-injection (4-weeks apart) influenza vaccination (standard dose) in 84 patients with multiple myeloma (40 with daratumumab in the past year)., Results: Seroprotection rates (titer ≥1/40) after the second vaccine injection were low across vaccinal subtypes (except for A-H3N2): 71.3% (A-H3N2), 19.7% (A-H1N1pdm09), 9.9% (B-Victoria), 11.3% (B-Yamagata). Only A-H3N2 seroprotection rates significantly increased with the booster in daratumumab-treated patients (30% (12/40) after one injection vs 55% (22/40) after the boost; P = 0.01).After propensity score weighting, daratumumab was not significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of seroprotection against at least one vaccine strain (OR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.22-1.88])., Conclusion: While daratumumab treatment did not lead to a significant reduction in seroprotection rates following influenza vaccination, a booster vaccine injection demonstrated potential benefit for specific strains (A-H3N2) in patients undergoing daratumumab treatment. Nevertheless, the overall low response rates in patients with multiple myeloma necessitates the development of alternative vaccination and prophylaxis strategies., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: F. Lemonnier received research funding from Institut Roche and travel grant from Gilead, G. Melica received honoraria from lectures from Astellas, Pfizer, Gilead, MSD, Janssen. S. Fourati received research grants from Moderna, and consulting fees from Moderna, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, GSK and Cepheid, as well as support for traval from Astellas, Gilead and Pfizer. C. Haioun received research funding and consulting honoraria for lectures from Amgen, Celgen, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, F.Hoffmann-La Roche, Servier, Takeda, Miltenyi. F. Lemonnier received research funding from La Roche Institute and support for attending meetings from Gilead. F. Le Bras received research funding from Takeda and Celgene BMS, and honoraria from Takeda, Kite Gilead and Novartis. K. Belhadj received nonfinancial research support from AbbVie., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignancy of the B-cell lineage. Remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of MM with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab, which can kill MM cells by inducing complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). We showed that the CDC efficacy of daratumumab and isatuximab is limited by membrane complement inhibitors, including CD46 and CD59, which are upregulated in MM cells. We recently developed a small recombinant protein, Ad35K++, which is capable of transiently removing CD46 from the cell surface. We also produced a peptide inhibitor of CD59 (rILYd4). In this study, we tested Ad35K++ and rILYd4 in combination with daratumumab and isatuximab in MM cells as well as in cells from two other B-cell malignancies. We showed that Ad35K++ and rILYd4 increased CDC triggered by daratumumab and isatuximab. The combination of both inhibitors had an additive effect in vitro in primary MM cells as well as in vivo in a mouse xenograft model of MM. Daratumumab and isatuximab treatment of MM lines (without Ad35K++ or rILYd4) resulted in the upregulation of CD46/CD59 and/or survival of CD46 high /CD59 high MM cells that escaped the second round of daratumumab and isatuximab treatment. The escape in the second treatment cycle was prevented by the pretreatment of cells with Ad35K++. Overall, our data demonstrate that Ad35K++ and rILYd4 are efficient co-therapeutics of daratumumab and isatuximab, specifically in multi-cycle treatment regimens, and could be used to improve treatment of multiple myeloma.

Background: Renal insufficiency (RI) is a key factor affecting the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Because the benefit of daratumumab for treating MM patients with RI remains unclear, our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of daratumumab on MM patients with RI., Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases as of October 24, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the article titles, abstracts, and full text to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.4. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response or better (≥CR), and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, all calculated as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: A total of 10 RCTs with 5003 patients were included. Add-on daratumumab improved PFS and OS among newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with RI (HR 0.48 [95% CI: 0.36, 0.64, I2 = 65%] and HR 0.63 [95% CI: 0.48, 0.82, I2 = 0%]) as well as relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM)-RI patients, compared with the control group (HR 0.46 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.58, I2 = 0%] and HR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.92, I2 = 0%]). In terms of the renal status, the efficacy of add-on daratumumab for MMRI patients was similar to that for MM patients with normal renal function. A prolonged PFS benefit for add-on daratumumab treatment versus the control was evident across all RRMM-RI subgroups, and the benefits tended to increase with the follow-up time., Conclusions: Our results indicate that MM patients with RI could benefit from a daratumumab-added regimen regardless of MM status. Additional high-quality RCTs are still warranted to confirm our findings.

We performed retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients previously exposed to daratumumab treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in real clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of IRd in these patients and select a subset of patients that would benefit from this treatment the most. In total, we analyzed 43 daratumumab-exposed RRMM patients treated in our center. Minimal response or better was achieved by 53.5% of patients from the cohort. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.56 months (95% CI: 2.56, 8.03) and median overall survival (OS) was 28.92 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR). Duration of response (DOR) was evaluable in 28 patients and reached a median of 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR). Next, we evaluated hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS. There was improved OS in patients that were not-triple refractory or worse (HR = 0.39, 95%Cl (0.14; 1.10), p = .07) and in patients, that had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT) (HR = 0.13, 95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) p = .003). Similar to OS, there was improved PFS in patients, that were not triple-refractory or worse (HR = 0.52, 95%Cl (0.25; 1.10), p = .08). We concluded, that the best survival benefit for RRMM patients pretreated with daratumumab to IRd regimen was observed in patients that were not triple-refractory and had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT). The DOR in these patients was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR)., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

There is no specific treatment for proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits (PGNMID), a disease that is very rare in the pediatric population. We report the case of a 15-year-old boy who presented with mildly reduced kidney function and nephrotic syndrome. Kidney biopsy revealed PGNMID with monoclonal deposits of IgG3 with kappa light chain restriction. Flow cytometry showed a significant CD38 plasma cell population in the peripheral blood in the absence of other signs of hematological malignancy. The patient was treated with a 6-month course of daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38. There was a significant reduction in proteinuria and normalization of kidney function. Based on positive experience with adults, daratumumab should also be studied in children with PGNMID., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is currently the only viable method of curing patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. In 30% to 50% of patients, donors and recipients have some level of ABO blood group incompatibility. ABO blood group incompatibility can cause antibodies against the donor's red blood cells to persist in the recipient's body, resulting in a delay of several months in the recovery of red blood cells. A number of different treatments have been reported for post-transplant pure red cell aplastic anaemia (PRCA), such as plasmapheresis, donor lymphocyte infusions, anti-thymocyte globulin, rituximab and steroids., Case Summary: A 41-year-old female diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia underwent peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in November 2013 from an HLA matched unrelated donor. The donor was AB-positive and the recipient was O-positive. The patient was diagnosed with PRCA three months after receiving the donor stem cell transplant. After failing multiple lines of therapy, the patient applied for daratumumab. After receiving three doses of daratumumab, the patient developed a reticulocyte response and no longer required blood transfusions., Conclusion: The use of daratumumab anti-CD38 for the remove of plasma cells is safe and effective and may be tried for refractory patients with PRCA after undergoing allo-HSCT for ABO incompatibility., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All of the authors declare that we have no conflict of interest., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

The use of 4-drug induction regimens for treatment naïve newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is associated with improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS). However, head-to-head trials of 4-drug combinations are lacking, and instead, these regimens are typically compared to 3-drug backbones; limiting the ability to discern whether any additional benefit (or toxicity) is simply additive or represents a synergy (or interaction). We conducted a meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials that randomized treatment naïve NDMM patients to either a 4-drug or 3-drug induction regimen. We included 11 trials which represented 6509 unique patients. PFS for all trials in the meta-analysis was 54 months with a 4-drug induction and 8.9 months with a 3-drug induction (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.45; 0.54), but there was no benefit to using a 4-drug induction that did not include an anti-CD38 antibody (PFS 4-drug 8.1 months, PFS 3-drug 8.0 months; HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.86; 1.06). Adverse events were more frequent with the quadruplet regimens but were predominately mild. High-grade (≥3) adverse events (AEs) that were more common with 4-drug regimens were infections (RR: 1.34; 95% CI 1.17; 1.54) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.12; 1.74). This study suggests that 4-drug induction regimens which include an anti-CD38 antibody improve efficacy although with additional toxicity in NDMM patients.

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 trial, CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827), cilta-cel demonstrated improved efficacy vs. standard of care (SOC; daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone [DPd] or pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone [PVd]) with a ≥ complete response (≥CR) rate of 73.1% vs. 21.8%., Methods: A cost-per-responder model was developed to assess the value of cilta-cel and SOC (87% DPd and 13% PVd) based on the CARTITUDE-4 trial data from a US mixed payer perspective (76.7% commercial, 23.3% Medicare). The model was developed using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥CR endpoints from CARTITUDE-4 over a period of 25.4 months. Inpatient stays, outpatient visits, drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring costs were included. The base-case model assumed an inpatient setting for each cilta-cel infusion; another scenario included 30% outpatient and 70% inpatient infusions. Costs of managing grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and grade 1-4 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were included. Subsequent therapy costs were incurred after disease progression; terminal care costs were considered upon death events. Outcomes included total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS between cilta-cel and SOC. Costs were adjusted to 2024 US dollars., Results: Total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and total cost per month in PFS were estimated at $704,641, $963,941, and $30,978 for cilta-cel, respectively, and $840,730, $3,856,559, and $42,520 for SOC over the 25.4-month period. Cost drivers included treatment acquisition costs before progression and subsequent treatment costs ($451,318 and $111,637 for cilta-cel; $529,795 and $265,167 for SOC). A scenario analysis in which 30% of patients received an outpatient infusion (assuming the same payer mix) showed a lower cost per complete responder for cilta-cel ($956,523) than those with an infusion in the inpatient setting exclusively., Discussion: This analysis estimated that cost per treated patient, cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS for cilta-cel were remarkably lower than for DPd or PVd, highlighting the substantial clinical and economic benefit of cilta-cel for patients with RRMM., Competing Interests: DH has consulted for BMS, Janssen, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Kite, and Karyopharm; has received research funding from BMS, Karyopharm, and the Pentecost Family Myeloma Research Center. OP has served on a speaker’s bureau for Adaptive Biotechnologies. SS and EZ are employed by Evidera and were contracted by Janssen to work on this project. SU has served in a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, and Takeda; and has received research funding from Amgen, Array BioPharma, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, and SkylineDx. SJ has served in a consulting or advisory role for BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech USA Inc., Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda; and has received travel, accommodations, and expenses from BMS and Janssen. XL, YZ, and ZQ are currently employed at Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and own Johnson & Johnson stock. SH is currently employed at Janssen Global Services, LLC, and owns Johnson & Johnson stock. This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company and Legend Biotech USA Inc. The sponsors were involved in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, and the decision to submit it for publication., (Copyright © 2024 Hansen, Lu, Puglianini, Sorensen, Usmani, Zhang, Huo, Zhang, Qureshi and Jagannath.)

Daratumumab-based treatment could control severe, treatment-refractory, life-threatening angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency associated with monoclonal gammopathy., Competing Interests: Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: R. S. Petersen has received speaking fees from Pharvaris. L. M. Fijen has received a conference travel grant from 10.13039/100013669Ionis Pharmaceuticals and has acted as a consultant for Pharvaris in the past. L. E. Franssen has received hospitality fees from Servier, Celgene, and AbbVie and speaker fees from AbbVie. J. M. I. Vos has received the following as institutional honoraria: research support from Beigene and AbbVie/Genmab; advisory board/consultancy fees from Sanofi and Janssen; and speaker fees from BMS, Sanofi, and Amgen. D. M. Cohn has received speaking fees from CSL Behring, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Pharvaris, and Takeda; consultancy fees from BioCryst, CSL Behring, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, KalVista, Pharming, Pharvaris, and Takeda; and research support from Ionis Pharmaceuticals, KalVista, Pharvaris, and Takeda., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Systemic light chain amyloidosis is a rare and severe disorder characterized by amyloid fibril deposition in various tissues, often leading to organ failure. Early diagnosis is crucial but challenging due to diverse clinical manifestations. Our case report presents a complex case of systemic light chain amyloidosis in a 62-year-old patient with cardiac, renal, neurological, and gastrointestinal involvement. The patient's treatment with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone, and intravenous daratumumab yielded significant improvement, aligning with recent studies. Following treatment, the patient improved from stage IV to stage II systemic light chain amyloidosis per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, indicating a more favorable prognosis. Hence, the successful integration of daratumumab in our case underscores its potential as a valuable addition to the treatment regimen for advanced systemic light chain amyloidosis, showcasing significant improvements across multiple organ systems., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Hachem et al.)

Certain therapies that target CD markers on some blood cells can affect pretransfusion testing. Key examples are anti-CD38, CD47 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies such as daratumumab (DARA) and magrolimab, which have presented a challenge for transfusion medicine laboratories around the globe. Scientists have been faced with not only introducing a protocol to provide safe blood to patients but also investigating the most effective method to remove the pretransfusion pan-agglutinating interference caused. A number of papers in the last 5 years have reported on various methods to remove pretransfusion interference; however, most of these studies have been conducted only in a few countries. Most recent reviews on this topic have focused on techniques and reagents to remove pretransfusion interference, and dithiothreitol is currently the gold standard for removing DARA interference. However, it was clear from this review that while many laboratories have developed processes for addressing interference in pretransfusion testing, and DARA interference may not be a major issue, there are still laboratories around the world, that may not have adequately addressed this issue. In addition, the impact of mAb interference on widely used techniques such as flow cytometry is unclear., (© 2024 The Authors. Vox Sanguinis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Blood Transfusion.)

POEMS syndrome, characterized as a rare multisystem paraneoplastic syndrome, arises from plasma cell abnormalities. Coined by Bardwick in 1980, the acronym POEMS delineates the distinctive features of the syndrome: Peripheral nerve Lesions, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal gammopathy, and Skin changes. The prevalence of POEMS syndrome stands at approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals. Owing to its low prevalence and the paucity of prospective studies, current treatment approaches largely hinge on retrospective studies and revolve around the use of plasma cell-directed therapy typically used in multiple myeloma treatments. This article presents the pioneering case of utilizing a four-drug combination regimen of DKRd (daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) as a first-line treatment. This is succeeded by induction therapy and subsequently, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A comprehensive review of related literature is conducted., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wang, Liao, Liu and Kong.)

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is among the most frequent causes for graft loss after kidney transplantation. While there are no approved therapies, several case reports with daratumumab and the very recent phase 2 trial of felzartamab in AMR have indicated the potential efficacy of therapeutic interventions targeting CD38. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging biomarker with injury-specific release and a short half-life, which could facilitate early diagnosis of AMR and monitoring of treatment response. We describe two cases of patients with chronic active AMR, who were treated with monthly daratumumab infusions, and in whom donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was measured longitudinally to monitor treatment response. In both patients, daratumumab treatment led to stabilization of kidney function parameters, a strong decline of dd-cfDNA below the previously established threshold for rejection, and partial or complete histologic resolution of AMR activity. Our case series suggests that dd-cfDNA may be a useful companion biomarker for longitudinal monitoring of anti-CD38 treatment in patients with AMR., Competing Interests: The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose. BO received travel reimbursement from Oncocyte. MO acts as a consultant to Oncocyte. JB, KB-K, and ES are employees of Chronix Biomedical GmbH, a subsidiary of Chronix Biomedical Inc. (an Oncocyte company), which holds intellectual property rights (EP 3004388B1, EP3201361B1, and US10570443B2). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Osmanodja, Akifova, Budde, Oellerich, Beck, Bornemann-Kolatzki, Schütz, Velden, Lehmann, Krüger, Bachmann and Kowald.)

Introduction: Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have improved the prognosis of patients with plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD), but are also associated with increased infectious adverse events. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common latent pathogen that is reactivated in immunocompromised individuals. Although CMV reactivation has mostly been reported after high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation in patients with PCD, cases of reactivation during anti-CD38 mAb therapy have been reported recently. Due to limited studies, we aimed to determine the frequency and impact of CMV reactivation during anti-CD38 mAb therapy., Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis included 154 consecutive patients with PCD who were treated with anti-CD38 mAbs at a single institution., Results: Seventy-six patients were evaluated for CMV reactivation by CMV pp65 antigen testing, and 29 (38%) patients, including nine with newly diagnosed PCD, showed positive results. Patients who tested positive for the CMV pp65 antigen had substantially lower serum albumin levels than those who tested negative. However, the two groups showed no marked difference in the concurrent anti-PCD medications or baseline absolute lymphocyte count. Although most patients showing positive results in the CMV pp65 antigen test had mild or no symptoms, with fever being the most common symptom, some patients developed CMV end-organ disease. In addition, CMV reactivation interfered with the course of anti-PCD treatment in most patients, necessitating dose reductions, delays, and discontinuation of chemotherapy., Conclusion: This study provides an overview of the clinical impact of CMV reactivation in patients with PCD treated with anti-CD38 mAb-containing regimens., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The prognosis of patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory (R/R) T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) has consistently been unsatisfactory, with limited treatment options. As reports, the CAG regimen can serve as a salvage treatment for R/R T-ALL/LBL, but there remains a subset of patients who do not benefit from it. Recent studies have indicated that daratumumab (Dara) and venetoclax (Ven) may offer promising therapeutic benefits for T-ALL/LBL. In light of these findings, we conducted a safety and efficacy evaluation of the enhanced treatment regimen, combining Dara and Ven with aclarubicin, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and etoposide (CAGE), in patients suffering from R/R T-ALL/LBL. The participants in this phase I trial were patients with R/R T-ALL/LBL who fail to standard treatment regimens. During each 28-day cycle, the patients were treated by Dara, Ven, cytarabine, aclarubicin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, etoposide. The primary endpoint of this study was the rate of remission. This report presents the prospective outcomes of 21 patients who received the salvage therapy of Dara and Ven combined with the CAGE regimen (Dara + Ven + CAGE). The objective remission rate (ORR) was determined to be 57.1%, while the complete remission (CR) rate was 47.6%. Notably, patients with the early T-cell precursor (ETP) subtype exhibited a significantly higher remission rate in the bone marrow compared to non-ETP patients (100% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.044). The Dara + Ven + CAGE regimen demonstrated a favorable remission rate in patients with R/R T-ALL/LBL. Moreover, the treatment was well-tolerated., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

We conducted a small, open-label, pilot study of daratumumab to explore target engagement, safety, and potential efficacy in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Daratumumab SC 1800 mg was given subcutaneously weekly for 8 weeks, then every 2 weeks for 16 weeks. Flow cytometry to measure the CD38+ proportion of CD8 + CD4- T cells and cognitive assessments were performed at baseline, day 176, and day 246. Daratumumab significantly reduced CD38 + CD8 + CD4- T cells after 24 weeks and this effect persisted 11 weeks thereafter. There was no hematological toxicity or unexpected adverse events. Responder analysis showed no improvement on cognitive outcome measures., Competing Interests: M.L. Gordon has received compensation for participating in Advisory Board meetings for Corium and Labcorp. He has been a clinical trial site Principal Investigator for AbbVie, Alector, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, and Novo Nordisk (payments made to institution). J. Koppel has received grant support from NIA, NIMH, and Alzheimer’s Foundation of America, and has been a clinical trial site Principal Investigator for Karuna and Otsuka (payments made to institution). J. Gomar has received grant support from NIA and Alzheimer’s Association (payments made to institution). E. Christen, L. Keehlisen, M. Gong, F. Lam, and L. Giliberto have no disclosures., (© 2024 – The authors. Published by IOS Press.)