Search

Aim: This study aimed to describe characteristics, treatment patterns and survival among Korean patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: A retrospective patient chart review was conducted in major cancer centers in Korea in 2014-2015. Participating physicians reviewed patient charts and reported characteristics, treatment patterns, clinician-defined progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ALK+ locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients. PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: Physicians reported on 55 ALK+ NSCLC patients. Median age at locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC diagnosis was 60 years. Most patients (82%) received initial chemotherapy; 13% received an ALK inhibitor in the first line; 62% received an ALK inhibitor by the end of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who received crizotinib, 83% discontinued and 13% died during crizotinib therapy. Median PFS on crizotinib was 6.7 months. Of those who discontinued, 32% switched to chemotherapy, 16% switched to a different ALK inhibitor and 52% received no further therapy. After discontinuing crizotinib, median OS was 6.0 months overall, and 3.4 months among patients who did not receive a second-generation ALK inhibitor., Conclusion: In this study of locally advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC patients in Korea, roughly one-third did not receive an ALK inhibitor. Among patients who discontinued crizotinib, over half received no further antineoplastic therapy and OS was poor, particularly among patients without second-generation ALK inhibitor use. These findings suggest a need for greater access to effective treatments following crizotinib discontinuation for ALK+ NSCLC patients in Korea., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: Periodic fever syndrome (PFS) conditions are characterized by recurrent attacks of fever and localized inflammation. This study examined the diagnostic pathway and treatments at tertiary centers for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), and mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD)/hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome (HIDS)., Methods: PFS specialists at medical centers in the US, the European Union, and the eastern Mediterranean participated in a retrospective chart review, providing de-identified data in an electronic case report form. Patients were treated between 2008 and 2012, with at least 1 year of followup; all had clinical and/or genetically proven disease and were on/eligible for biologic treatment., Results: A total of 134 patients were analyzed: FMF (n = 49), TRAPS (n = 47), and MKD/HIDS (n = 38). Fever was commonly reported as severe across all indications. Other frequently reported severe symptoms were serositis for FMF patients and elevated acute-phase reactants and gastrointestinal upset for TRAPS and MKD/HIDS. A long delay from disease onset to diagnosis was seen within TRAPS and MKD/HIDS (5.8 and 7.1 years, respectively) compared to a 1.8-year delay in FMF patients. An equal proportion of TRAPS patients first received anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents, whereas IL-1 blockade was the main choice for FMF patients resistant to colchicine and MKD/HIDS patients. For TRAPS patients, treatment with anakinra versus anti-TNF treatments as first biologic agent resulted in significantly higher clinical and biochemical responses (P = 0.03 and P < 0.01, respectively). No significant differences in responses were observed between biologic agents among other cohorts., Conclusion: Referral patterns and diagnostic delays highlight the need for greater awareness and improved diagnostics for PFS. This real-world treatment assessment supports the need for further refinement of treatment practices., (© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: Second-generation ALK inhibitors are recently available for ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with crizotinib. This study described characteristics, treatment sequencing, and outcomes among locally advanced/metastatic crizotinib-experienced ALK+ NSCLC patients., Materials and Methods: From July 2014 to June 2015, a retrospective patient chart review was conducted among physicians from the US, EU, Korea, and Latin America. Participating clinicians identified their ALK+ NSCLC patients who received crizotinib and reported on their clinical characteristics, treatments, and survival using a pre-defined case report form. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to describe overall survival (OS) and clinician-defined progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Participating clinicians reviewed charts of 158 ALK+ NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib during the study period. Crizotinib was most commonly received in the second-line setting (41% of patients), though this varied across geographical regions. Roughly half (53%) of the patients who discontinued crizotinib received further antineoplastic therapy; second-generation ALK inhibitors (44%) and chemotherapy (42%) regimens were used most frequently. Following crizotinib discontinuation, median OS was 8.2 months. Among patients who did not initiate a second-generation ALK inhibitor following crizotinib, median OS was 4.9 months; among those who did, median OS was not reached. Among patients who received chemotherapy immediately following crizotinib discontinuation, time to clinician-defined PFS from post-crizotinib chemotherapy initiation was 3.6 months., Conclusion: Following crizotinib discontinuation, many patients received no further antineoplastic therapy, and OS was poor among patients who did not receive a second-generation ALK inhibitor. Recently available second-generation ALK inhibitors may provide important treatment options for ALK+ NSCLC patients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Healthcare resource utilization in breast cancer varies by disease characteristics and treatment choices. However, lack of clarity in guidelines can result in varied interpretation and heterogeneous treatment management and costs. In Europe, the extent of this variability is unclear. Therefore, evaluation of chemotherapy use and costs versus hormone therapy across Europe is needed., Methods: This retrospective chart review (N = 355) examined primarily direct costs for chemotherapy versus hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer across 5 European countries (France, Germany, The Netherlands, Belgium, and Sweden)., Results: Total direct costs across the first 3 treatment lines were approximately €10,000 to €14,000 lower for an additional line of hormone therapy-based treatment versus switching to chemotherapy-based treatment. Direct cost difference between chemotherapy-based and hormone therapy-based regimens was approximately €1900 to €2500 per month. Chemotherapy-based regimens were associated with increased resource utilization (managing side effects; concomitant targeted therapy use; and increased frequencies of hospitalizations, provider visits, and monitoring tests). The proportion of patients taking sick leave doubled after switching from hormone therapy to chemotherapy., Conclusions: These results suggest chemotherapy is associated with increased direct costs and potentially with increased indirect costs (lower productivity of working patients) versus hormone therapy in HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Background: International guidelines for hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2(-)) advanced breast cancer (BC) recommend sequential lines of hormonal therapy (HT), and only recommend chemotherapy for patients with extensive visceral involvement or rapidly progressive disease. This study evaluated actual physician-reported treatments for advanced BC in Europe., Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 355 postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced BC who progressed on ≥1 line of HT (adjuvant or advanced) and completed ≥1 line of chemotherapy (advanced). Treatment choice was evaluated for each line of therapy., Results: Of 355 patients, 111 (31%) received first-line chemotherapy, whereas 218 (61%) and 26 (7%) switched from HT to chemotherapy in second and third line, respectively. More patients receiving first-line HT had bone metastases (73% vs 27% chemotherapy). Patients treated with first-line chemotherapy had more brain (12% vs 3% HT) or extensive liver (13% vs 6% HT) metastases. Subgroup analysis of 188 patients who received first-line HT and had de novo advanced BC or relapsed/recurrent disease more than 1 year after adjuvant therapy found that the majority (89%; n = 167) of these patients switched to chemotherapy in second line. However, among these 167 patients, 27% had no significant changes in metastases between first and second line. Among the 73% of patients who had significant changes in metastases, 20% had no brain metastases or extensive visceral disease., Conclusions: Our study suggests that the guideline-recommended use of multiple HT lines is open to interpretation and that optimal treatment for European postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced BC who responded to HT may not be achieved.