1. First-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Real-world experience from >2000 patients treated in the multicentre AVANTI study.
- Author
-
Müller V, Ruhnke M, Hoffmann O, Grafe A, Tomé O, Fett W, Bruch HR, Sommer-Joos AK, and Schneeweiss A
- Subjects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Bevacizumab, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Receptor, ErbB-2, Treatment Outcome, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Aim: The multicentre non-interventional AVANTI study assessed safety, effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes with approved first-line bevacizumab-containing regimens for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/MBC) in German routine oncology practice., Methods: Eligible patients had HER2-negative LR/MBC, no bevacizumab contraindications and no prior chemotherapy for LR/MBC. Chemotherapy schedule, diagnostics and follow-up were at physicians' discretion. Data were collected for 1 year after starting bevacizumab, then every 6 months for 1.5 years (maximum follow-up: 2.5 years). Patients and physicians rated treatment satisfaction. Subgroup analyses were prespecified in clinically relevant populations, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)., Results: Between November 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016, 2065 eligible patients at 346 centres received bevacizumab with paclitaxel or capecitabine. Patients receiving bevacizumab-capecitabine were less likely to have de novo disease and more likely to have TNBC, age ≥60 years and prior anthracycline/taxane and/or endocrine therapy. Median PFS was 12.6 (95% CI 11.9-13.2) months (12.8 with bevacizumab-paclitaxel, 10.5 with bevacizumab-capecitabine); median OS was 23.9 (95% CI 22.2-25.1) months. Outcomes were worse in patients with TNBC, prior anthracycline/taxane or prior endocrine therapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 27% of patients. Treatment was discontinued for adverse events in 15%. Treatment satisfaction was rated as good or better by 304/394 responding patients (77%) at week 54 and in 1393/2065 patients (67%) by physicians overall., Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, effectiveness and safety of first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for LR/MBC were consistent with experience from phase III trials. Patient and physician treatment satisfaction showed high concordance., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest statement V.M. reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Teva and Seattle Genetics (for advisory boards) and from Genomic Health, Hexal, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, ClinSol, Novartis, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Tesaro, Seattle Genetics and Nektar (for consultancy); research funding to his institution from Novartis, Roche, Seattle Genetics and Genentech; and travel grants from Roche, Pfizer and Daiichi-Sankyo. O.H. reports honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Hexal, Amgen and Riemser Pharma; advisory/consultancy roles for Roche, Novartis, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo and Hexal; and travel/accommodation/expenses from Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Hexal and Amgen. A.-K.S.-J. is an employee of Roche Pharma AG and holds shares in Roche. A.S. reports honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Tesaro and Lilly; expert testimony for Roche and AstraZeneca; research funding to his institution from Roche, Celgene and AbbVie; and travel/accommodation/expenses from Roche, Celgene and Pfizer. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF