1. Efficacy and safety of digital nerve block for pain management during sharp debridement of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: A prospective observational study.
- Author
-
Bixio R, Mastropaolo F, Nava F, Veliaj O, Fracassi E, Viapiana O, Rossini M, and Idolazzi L
- Abstract
Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis and vascular abnormalities, often leading to the development of digital ulcers (DUs). DUs are painful and debilitating, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Effective pain management during debridement is crucial, yet there is no consensus on the optimal approach. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of digital nerve block (DNB) using lidocaine and mepivacaine for pain control during sharp debridement of DUs in SSc patients., Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted from September 2023 to May 2024 at the Rheumatology Operating Unit, University of Verona. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 mL of 2% lidocaine or 2% mepivacaine for DNB. Pain levels were assessed using a categorical grading scale during the injection and debridement. The outcomes were pain control and performance of lidocaine versus mepivacaine., Results: The cohort developed 46 ulcers. The pain was abolished in almost all patients. Lidocaine achieved faster anaesthesia (127.92 ± 34.32 s) compared with mepivacaine (252.65 ± 49.89 s, p < 0.001). Mepivacaine resulted in less pain during injection ( p = 0.006). No significant difference in pain levels during debridement was observed between the two anaesthetics. Three mild adverse effects (Raynaud's phenomenon) were reported. All procedures were completed successfully, and 35 ulcers healed with a mean time of 6.1 ± 7.77 weeks., Conclusions: DNB with mepivacaine provides effective pain control during DU debridement in SSc patients, with lower injection site pain and comparable efficacy to lidocaine. The procedure is safe, well-tolerated and facilitates successful ulcer healing. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2024.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF