1. Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the pediatric population: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Giossi R, Menichelli D, D'Amico F, Idotta L, Cirino M, Scardoni L, Furlanetto C, Maggi M, Bernocchi O, Bosca F, Girlando L, Pignatelli P, Pani A, Pastori D, Tozzo A, Scaglione F, and Fornasari D
- Subjects
- Humans, Child, Anticoagulants therapeutic use, Hemorrhage drug therapy, Blood Coagulation, Administration, Oral, Venous Thromboembolism diagnosis, Venous Thromboembolism drug therapy, Venous Thromboembolism prevention & control, Heart Diseases drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a cornerstone of adult venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. Recently, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DOACs in pediatrics have been performed., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in the pediatric population., Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from initiation up to August 20, 2022, for RCTs comparing DOACs to standard of care (SOC) in patients aged <18 years according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42022353870). The primary analysis was performed according to the anticoagulation intensity and clinical setting (ie, prophylaxis in cardiac disease or treatment in VTE). Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality and VTE. Safety outcomes were major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-MB, any bleeding, serious adverse events, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs)., Results: Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and 6 in the meta-analysis (3 prophylaxis in cardiac disease and 3 treatment in VTE). DOACs showed a significant reduction of VTE recurrence for treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.94) and a nonsignificant reduction in VTE occurrence in prophylaxis (OR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03-1.55). No differences were observed for any bleeding, serious AEs, and MB in prophylaxis. Nonsignificant trends were observed for clinically relevant non-MB, MB in treatment, and discontinuation due to AE in prophylaxis. We found a significant increase in discontinuation due to AE in treatment., Conclusions: DOAC treatment seems to reduce VTE compared with SOC without major safety issues in the pediatric population, whereas DOAC prophylaxis seems at least comparable to SOC., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interests R.G. received support for congress participation from Mylan and acted as a consultant for Daiichi-Sankyo, outside this work. M.C. received support for congress participation from Abbvie. F.S. received fees as speaker or member of Advisory Boards from Bayer, MSD, Angelini, and Dompè. D.F. received fees in the last 2 years as speaker or member of Advisory Boards from the following companies: Alfasigma, Astellas, Bayer, Grünenthal, Lundbeck, Molteni, and SPA. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF