Search

Background: Hepaticojejunostomy is a challenging and complex procedure to be administered with the confidence, in conditions which contain a large number of bile duct damaged by benign pathologies or major bile duct trauma., Methods: Here, our clinical series of portoenterostomy (PE), in which we applied in patients who had aggressive hilar dissection for hilar benign biliary pathologies and major bile duct traumas during laparoscopic cholecystectomies were discussed in the light of the literature. The PE procedure was performed in the presence of three or more bile ducts that could not be merged. The classic Roux-en-Y style hepaticojejunostomy was performed to prevent postoperative ascending cholangitis. The ropeway system was used when sewing. 6-8 stitches were laid on the back or anterior wall and the sutures were tied on the outside. Thin-long silicone stents placed in the small diameter (2 mm) bile ducts coinciding with the anastomosis line were extended into the jejunum., Results: This study included six patients who underwent PE between 2015-2019. Five of the cases were male and one was female and the mean age was 70.33 years. Hepaticojejunostomy was performed in two of the four cases with biliary trauma, but the endoscopic and surgical revision was performed due to developing strictures and bile flow was corrected with stents. In these two cases coming from the external center, PE was applied to multiple bile ducts resulting from aggressive hilar dissection. In two patients who developed major biliary tract trauma (Strasberg-Bismuth-E4) at our hospital underwent PE in the same session. In the other two cases, PE was performed due to a large number of bile ducts caused by benign pathology-related complications (Mirizzi syndrome, Type 4). The mean follow-up period for six patients was 20.1 months (range 11 to 37 months)., Conclusion: Portoenterostomy can be performed as a salvage procedure in cases where multiple biliary tracts occur and hepaticojejunostomy is inadequate. PE can be safely used in selected cases that had benign pathologies, major bile duct trauma, in the presence of intense fibrosis, inflammation, very thin bile ducts and more fragile tissues in the liver hilum. PE should be performed in centers with surgeons experienced in hepatobiliary surgery. However, to better understand the efficacy of PE, large multicentric clinical series and patient follow-up are required.

Hepaticojejunostomy is a challenging and complex procedure to be done with confidence in conditions that contain a large number of segmental bile ducts. Portoenterostomy can be defined as the joining of multiple bile ducts into a single cavity using segmenter bile duct ends, stents, and surrounding connective tissues. During surgery, in cases with advanced stage biliary tract tumors that cannot be performed hepatectomy, after aggressive dissections to provide a negative surgical margin, a large number of segmental bile ducts can be revealed and needs to ensure the continuity of bile flow. Here, our clinical series of portoenterostomy (PE) in which we applied in patients who had aggressive hilar dissection and resection for hilar cholangiocarcinomas and biliary tract tumors were discussed. The study included 15 patients who underwent PE for biliary tract tumors and hilar cholangiocarcinomas between 2015 and 2019. Six of the patients had a tumor-negative surgical margin, with a mean follow-up of 14.4 months (range 2 to 28 months). Nine of the patients had a tumor-positive surgical margin, with a mean follow-up of 7.7 months (range 2 to 17 months). Portoenterostomy instead of hepaticojejunostomy in small and multiple biliary radicles and bile duct cancers has been successfully performed in 15 patients of bile duct cancer and Klatskin tumor. In the presence of active inflammation, fibrosis, major bile duct trauma, and thin bile duct radicles, this method, which is described in detail, provides an excellent salvage surgical procedure with less morbidity., Competing Interests: Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© Association of Surgeons of India 2020.)

Background: Iatrogenic biliary tract injury (BTI) is a rare complication but has high risks of morbidity and mortality when it is not early noticed. Although the treatment varies depending on the size of injury and the time until the injury is noticed, endoscopic and percutaneous interventions are usually sufficient. However, it should be remembered that these interventions may cause major complications in the following years, such as biliary stricture, recurrent episodes of cholangitis and even cirrhosis. In this paper, we aimed to present our approach to BTI following cholecystectomy and our treatment management in the light of the literature., Methods: The medical records of 105 patients who were treated for BTI between January 2015 and July 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The majority of the patients consisted of the patients who underwent cholecystectomy at an external medical center and were referred to our clinic due to biliary leakage (BL). Patients were grouped according to Strasberg classification determined by the place of leakage., Results: Among 105 patients included in this study, 55 were male, and 50 were female. Mean age was 55.2±16.26 years (range, 21-93 years). According to Strasberg classification, type A, B, C, D and E injuries were detected in 57, 1, 3, 29 and 15 patients, respectively. Eighty-five patients were successfully treated with endoscopic and percutaneous interventions, while 20 patients underwent surgery., Conclusion: In all patients with suspected BTI, a detailed screening and appropriate treatment provide a significant decline in morbidity and mortality. Therefore, early diagnosis is very important for both early and late outcomes.

Background: Anal fissure which is defined as a longitudinal tear in anoderm under the dentate line is one of the most common benign diseases of anorectal area, and due to the severe pain during the defecation and emotional stress that it causes may reduce people's quality of life. There are several treatment methods such as medical substances and surgical procedures. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the safe and adequate option of lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) in chronic anal fissure treatment., Methods: This study is a retrospective study in which 417 patients who were treated for chronic anal fissure were included., Results: Of 417 patients included in the study, 228 (54.7%) were female and the mean ± SD age was 36.1 ± 8.96 years (ranging from 17 to 73 years). Major complaints of patients; pain, bleeding, constipation, pruritus, perianal discharge. Recurrence occurred in 15 patients (3.6%) (12 males, three females) and eight patients (1.9%) developed incontinence (four with gas, four with soiling and seven females, one male). The complaints of all patients with gas incontinence and a patient with fluid incontinence regressed, whereas three patients had permanent fluid incontinence., Conclusion: LIS is still the gold standard for the treatment of chronic anal fissure when the physicians would like to avoid recurrence and obtain the best pain relief., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)