Search

Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibility of metric-related knowledge: While taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multi-stage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides the first reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. To facilitate comprehension, illustrations and specific examples accompany each pitfall. As a structured body of information accessible to researchers of all levels of expertise, this work enhances global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation.

Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. In biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, and thus fail to adequately measure scientific progress and hinder translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, we created Metrics Reloaded, a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. Developed by a large international consortium in a multistage Delphi process, it is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint-a structured representation of the given problem that captures all aspects that are relevant for metric selection, from the domain interest to the properties of the target structure(s), dataset and algorithm output. On the basis of the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics while being made aware of potential pitfalls. Metrics Reloaded targets image analysis problems that can be interpreted as classification tasks at image, object or pixel level, namely image-level classification, object detection, semantic segmentation and instance segmentation tasks. To improve the user experience, we implemented the framework in the Metrics Reloaded online tool. Following the convergence of ML methodology across application domains, Metrics Reloaded fosters the convergence of validation methodology. Its applicability is demonstrated for various biomedical use cases., (© 2024. Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Validation metrics are key for tracking scientific progress and bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that, particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately. Although taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multistage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides a reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Although focused on biomedical image analysis, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. The work serves to enhance global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation., (© 2024. Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Recent developments in data science in general and machine learning in particular have transformed the way experts envision the future of surgery. Surgical Data Science (SDS) is a new research field that aims to improve the quality of interventional healthcare through the capture, organization, analysis and modeling of data. While an increasing number of data-driven approaches and clinical applications have been studied in the fields of radiological and clinical data science, translational success stories are still lacking in surgery. In this publication, we shed light on the underlying reasons and provide a roadmap for future advances in the field. Based on an international workshop involving leading researchers in the field of SDS, we review current practice, key achievements and initiatives as well as available standards and tools for a number of topics relevant to the field, namely (1) infrastructure for data acquisition, storage and access in the presence of regulatory constraints, (2) data annotation and sharing and (3) data analytics. We further complement this technical perspective with (4) a review of currently available SDS products and the translational progress from academia and (5) a roadmap for faster clinical translation and exploitation of the full potential of SDS, based on an international multi-round Delphi process., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Anand Malpani is a future employee at Mimic Technologies Inc. (Seattle, WA, US). Johannes Fallert and Lars Mündermann are employed at KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG (Tuttlingen, Germany). Hirenkumar Nakawala is employed at CMR Surgical Ltd (Cambridge, UK). Nicolas Padoy is a scientific advisor of Caresyntax (Berlin, Germany). Daniel A. Hashimoto is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson (New Brunswick, NJ, USA), Verily Life Sciences (San Francisco, CA, USA), and Activ Surgical (Boston, MA, USA). He has received research support from Olympus Corporation and the Intuitive Foundation. Carla Pugh is the founder of 10 Newtons Inc. (Madison, WI, US). Danail Stoyanov is employed at Digital Surgery Ltd (London, UK) and Odin Vision Ltd (London, UK). Teodor Grantcharov is the founder of Surgical Safety Technologies Inc. (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). Tobias Roß is employed at Quality Match GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany). All other authors do not declare any conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

About 50% of prostate cancer (PCa) tumors are TMPRSS2:ERG (T2E) fusion-positive (T2E+), but the role of T2E in PCa progression is not fully understood. We were interested in investigating epigenomic alterations associated with T2E+ PCa. Using different sequencing cohorts, we found several transcripts of the miR-449 cluster to be repressed in T2E+ PCa. This repression correlated strongly with enhanced expression of NOTCH and several of its target genes in TCGA and ICGC PCa RNA-seq data. We corroborated these findings using a cellular model with inducible T2E expression. Overexpression of miR-449a in vitro led to silencing of genes associated with NOTCH signaling ( NOTCH1 , HES1 ) and HDAC1 . Interestingly, HDAC1 overexpression led to the repression of HES6 , a negative regulator of the transcription factor HES1 , the primary effector of NOTCH signaling, and promoted cell proliferation by repressing the cell cycle inhibitor p21. Inhibition of NOTCH as well as knockdown of HES1 reduced the oncogenic properties of PCa cell lines. Using tissue microarray analysis encompassing 533 human PCa cores, ERG-positive areas exhibited significantly increased HES1 expression. Taken together, our data suggest that an epigenomic regulatory network enhances NOTCH signaling and thereby contributes to the oncogenic properties of T2E+ PCa.