1. External validation and comparative performance of the SLANT score for neuroprognostication in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors undergoing targeted temperature management: insights from an Asian cohort.
- Author
-
Ho YJ, Fan CY, Kuo YC, Chen CH, Lien CJ, Huang CH, Huang CT, Huang SS, Chen CY, Sung CW, Chiang WC, Chang WT, Huang CH, and Huang EP
- Abstract
Background: Neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depend on multiple factors, including the patient's baseline condition and post-arrest management. The SLANT, developed specifically for OHCA survivors treated with targeted temperature management (TTM), requires further validation, particularly in Asian populations., Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2016 to 2023, examining demographics, pre-arrest conditions, resuscitation events, and laboratory biomarkers following TTM. The primary outcome was defined as a poor neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the included variables., Results: A total of 448 eligible adult patients were included, of whom 77.9% experienced poor neurological outcomes at discharge. The performance of the current cohort was comparable to that of the original SLANT cohort, achieving an area under the curve of 0.797 (95% confidence interval: 0.746-0.849). All five factors of the SLANT score remained statistically significant in predicting poor neurological outcomes. At a cutoff of ≥ 6.5, the SLANT score demonstrated a specificity of 53.5% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.9%. Increasing the cutoff value to 8.5 improved the specificity to 66.7% and the PPV to 89.6%., Conclusion: The SLANT showed high PPV for predicting poor neurological outcomes at discharge in patients with OHCA undergoing TTM across a multicenter Asian cohort. Combining the score with other neurological assessments is recommended for improved neuroprognostication., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NTUH (No. 202401013RINC). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study. Consent for publication: This manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data in any form (including any individual details, images or videos). Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF