1. Physicians' and patients' perceived risks of chronic pain medication and co-medications in Quebec, Canada: a cross-sectional study.
- Author
-
De Clifford-Faugère G, Lacasse A, Nguena Nguefack HL, Godbout-Parent M, Boulanger A, and Julien N
- Subjects
- Humans, Cross-Sectional Studies, Quebec epidemiology, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Adult, Aged, Analgesics therapeutic use, Analgesics adverse effects, Physicians psychology, Chronic Pain drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: The risks associated with medications and co-medications for chronic pain (CP) can influence a physician's choice of drugs and dosages, as well as a patient's adherence to the medication. High-quality care requires patients to participate in medication decisions. This study aimed to compare perceived risks of medications and co-medications between physicians and persons living with CP., Methods: This cross-sectional survey conducted in Quebec, Canada, included 83 physicians (snowball sampling) and 141 persons living with CP (convenience sampling). Perceived risks of adverse drug reaction of pain medications and co-medications were assessed using 0-10 numerical scales (0 = no risk, 10 = very high risk). An arbitrary cutoff point of 2-points was used to ease the interpretation of our data. Physicians scored the 36 medication subclasses of the Medication Quantification Scale 4.0 (MQS 4.0) through an online survey, while CP patients scored the medication subclasses they had taken in the last three months through telephone interviews., Results: Persons living with CP consistently perceived lower risks of adverse drug reaction compared to physicians. For eight subclasses, the difference in the mean perceived risk score was > 2 points and statistically significant (p < 0.05): non-specific oral NSAIDs, acetaminophen in combination with an opioid, short-acting opioids, long-acting opioids, tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and medical cannabis., Conclusions: Divergent risk perceptions between physicians and patients underscore the necessity of facilitating a more extensive discussion on medications and co-medications risks to empower patients to make informed decisions and participate in shared decision-making regarding their treatments., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Our research was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of Canada’s Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, a policy informed by international ethics norms. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of Université du Québec in Abitibi-Témiscamingue (#2020-01–Diallo, M.A.). Informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants. The physicians provided electronic informed consent via an online questionnaire, and the patients provided electronic consent via email with an attached consent letter. This consent was also reconfirmed orally at the beginning of the telephone questionnaire. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF