Search

Background: The objective of this study was to test a novel household-based approach to improve late-season influenza vaccine uptake during the 2020-2021 season, using Epic's MyChart patient portal messages and/or interactive voice response telephone calls., Methods: This study was a non-blinded, quality improvement program using a block randomized design conducted among patients from Reliant Medical Group clinics residing in a traditional household (≥2 individuals clinically active in the Reliant system living at the same address). Households were randomized 1:1:1 into intervention arms: non-tailored communication (messaging based on CDC's seasonal influenza vaccination campaign), tailored communication (comprehensive communication including reinforcement of the importance of influenza vaccination for high-risk individuals), and standard-of-care control. Influenza vaccination during the program was captured via medical records, and the odds of vaccination among communication arms versus the control arm were assessed. A survey assessing influenza vaccination drivers was administered using MyChart., Results: Influenza vaccination increased by 3.3% during the program period, and no significant differences in vaccination were observed in intervention arms relative to the control arm. Study operationalization faced substantial challenges related to the concurrent COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with vaccinated survey respondents, unvaccinated respondents less frequently reported receiving a recommendation for influenza vaccination from their healthcare provider (15.8% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001) or awareness that vaccination could protect themselves and higher risk contacts (82.3% vs. 92.6%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: No significant effects of the interventions were observed. Survey results highlighted the importance of healthcare provider recommendations and the need for increased education around the benefits of vaccination., (© 2022 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: While frequent contact with diabetes care providers may improve glycemic control among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), in-person visits are labor-intensive and costly. This study was conducted to assess the impact of an intensive remote therapy (IRT) intervention for pediatric patients with T1D., Methods: Pediatric patients with T1D were randomized to IRT or conventional care (CC) for 6 months. Both cohorts continued routine quarterly clinic visits and uploaded device data; for the IRT cohort, data were reviewed and patients were contacted if regimen adjustments were indicated. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline was assessed at 6 and 9 months. Diabetes-related quality of life (QoL), healthcare services utilization, and hypoglycemic events were also tracked., Results: Among 117 enrollees (60 IRT, 57 CC), mean (SD) 6-month %HbA1c change for IRT vs CC was -0.34 (0.85) (-3.7 mmol/mol) vs -0.05 (0.74) (-0.5 mmol/mol) overall (P = .071); -0.15 (0.67) (1.6 mmol/mol) vs -0.02 (0.66) (0.2 mmol/mol) for ages 8 to 12 (P = .541); and -0.50 (0.95) (-5.5 mmol/mol) vs -0.06 (0.80) (-0.7 mmol/mol) for ages 13 to 17 (P = .056). Diabetes-related QoL increased by 6.5 and 1.3 points for IRT and CC, respectively (P = .062). Three months after intervention cessation, %HbA1c changed minimally among treated children aged 8 to 12 but increased by 0.22 (0.89) (2.4 mmol/mol) among those aged 13 to 17., Conclusions: IRT substantially affected diabetes metrics and improved QoL among pediatric patients with T1D. Adolescents experienced a stronger treatment effect, but had difficulty in sustaining improved control after intervention cessation., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)