Search

Data in this article presents the results of conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses in 129 patients with confirmed MECOM rearrangement (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.03.002) [1]. Generally, the MECOM rearrangement has arisen through translocation, inversion, and insertion and/or unknown mechanism. In addition to the typical chromosomal aberrations, inv(3)(q21q26.2) and t(3; 3)(q21; q26.6) [2-4], over 50% of cases presented here exhibit a wide spectrum of MECOM rearrangement-driven, atypical chromosomal aberrations, including inv(3) with breakpoint other than 3q21; t(1; 3); t(2; 3); t(3; 6); t(3; 8); t(3; 12); t(3; 17); t(3; 21) as well as an insertion of 3q26.2 into different chromosomes. These cases are thoroughly characterized by karyotyping, interphase-, metaphase-, map-back FISH and whole chromosomal painting (WCP) analyses.

Chromosome translocation t(16;21)(q24;q22)/RUNX1-RUNX1T3 is an infrequent but recurrent chromosomal abnormality identified in myeloid neoplasms, with only 25 cases have been reported to date. Here, we report eight cases (six women and two men) of myeloid neoplasms associated with t(16;21)(q24;q22): five with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, two with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and one with blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. Morphologic and immunophenotypic features include granulocytic dysplasia, blasts with prominent perinuclear hof, large orange-pink granules, long and slim Auer rods, and aberrant expression of CD19. Six patients received AML-based regimens, and five achieved complete remission after initial induction therapy. Our study suggests that myeloid neoplasm with t(16;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 resembles AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1, in regard to morphology, immunophenotype, and response to therapy. Therefore, the clinical management of AML with t(8;21) may provide the best model for patients with myeloid neoplasms with t(16;21).

Purpose Patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL) rarely achieve long-term survival following disease relapse. Some patients with DHL undergo consolidative autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) to reduce the risk of relapse, although the benefit of this treatment strategy is unclear. Methods Patients with DHL who achieved first complete remission following completion of front-line therapy with either rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or intensive front-line therapy, and deemed fit for autoSCT, were included. A landmark analysis was performed, with time zero defined as 3 months after completion of front-line therapy. Patients who experienced relapse before or who were not followed until that time were excluded. Results Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years were 80% and 87%, respectively, for all patients (n = 159). Three-year RFS and OS rates did not differ significantly for autoSCT (n = 62) versus non-autoSCT patients (n = 97), but 3-year RFS was inferior in patients who received R-CHOP compared with intensive therapy (56% v 88%; P = .002). Three-year RFS and OS did not differ significantly for patients in the R-CHOP or intensive therapy cohorts when analyzed by receipt of autoSCT. The median OS following relapse was 8.6 months. Conclusion In the largest reported series, to our knowledge, of patients with DHL to achieve first complete remission, consolidative autoSCT was not associated with improved 3-year RFS or OS. In addition, patients treated with R-CHOP experienced inferior 3-year RFS compared with those who received intensive front-line therapy. When considered in conjunction with reports of patients with newly diagnosed DHL, which demonstrate lower rates of disease response to R-CHOP compared with intensive front-line therapy, our findings further support the use of intensive front-line therapy for this patient population.

In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, MYC rearrangement (MYC-R), MYC expression, or concurrent expression of MYC and BCL2 is associated with a poorer prognosis. P53 expression also has been shown to confer inferior survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, but less is known about the role of P53 expression in those with MYC-R, MYC expression (MYC+), or MYC&BCL2 co-expression (MYC+/BCL2+). We studied P53 expression in 201 patients with untreated de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Sixty-seven (33%) cases were P53 positive, 56 (28%) had MYC-R (including 17 MYC/BCL2 double hit lymphoma), 86 (45%) were MYC+/BCL2+, and 47 (24%) were positive for both MYC and P53. Compared with patients with P53 negative lymphoma, the P53 positive group had a poorer overall survival (P=0.004). In patients with lymphoma harboring MYC-R, MYC expression or MYC+/BCL2+, P53 expression was associated with a significantly worse overall survival (P<0.0001, P=0.01, and P=0.035, respectively). Patients with lymphoma showing concurrent P53 expression and MYC-R had a worse prognosis compared with patients with either P53 expression or MYC-R alone (P<0.0001). Similarly, P53 enhanced the negative prognostic effect of MYC expression in DLBCL patients. In addition, among patients with lymphoma with concurrent MYC and P53 expression, MYC and BCL2 or BCL2 & P53 expression, those patients with tumors with MYC and P53 expression had the worst overall survival (P=0.005), regardless of BCL2 expression status. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that both MYC-R and P53 expression were independent prognostic factors in this patient cohort. In conclusion, our data suggest that P53 expression and MYC -R or MYC expression have an additive negative prognostic effect in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Assessment of P53 expression adds additional prognostic information in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, especially in subgroups with MYC-R, MYC expression and MYC and BCL2 double expression.

Objectives: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) may present de novo or undergo progression to a clinically aggressive variant, known as a blastoid or pleomorphic variant. We report an unusual case of classic MCL in a 78-year-old man with a typical immunophenotype, including CD5 positivity, who subsequently relapsed with CD5-negative pleomorphic variant MCL., Methods: Biopsy specimens were evaluated using Wright-Giemsa-stained or H&E-stained sections, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, conventional cytogenetic, next-generation sequencing, and fluorescence in situ hybridization., Results: The patient continued to be refractory to intensive chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Initial conventional cytogenetic analysis showed a complex karyotype with amplification of the CCND1-IGH fusion gene on the der(14): 44, Y, t(X;2)(p22.3;q21), del(2)(p21), del(6)(p23), add(7)(p22),-9, del(9)(p22), add(11)(q13),-13, add(14)(p11.2), der(14)t(11;14)(q13;q32)hsr(14)(q32), add(18)(q23), add(21)(p11.1),-22,+mar[12]. A repeat biopsy revealed MCL, pleomorphic variant, with loss of CD5 expression and extra copies of the MYC CONCLUSIONS: CCND1-IGH fusion-amplification with MYC copy number gain is extremely rare and may play a role in disease progression in a subset of MCL cases., (© American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BI-ALCL) is a rare type of T-cell lymphoma that arises around breast implants. The optimal management of this disease has not been established. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of different therapies used in patients with BI-ALCL to determine an optimal treatment approach., Patients and Methods: In this study, we applied strict criteria to pathologic findings, assessed therapies used, and conducted a clinical follow-up of 87 patients with BI-ALCL, including 50 previously reported in the literature and 37 unreported. A Prentice, Williams, and Peterson model was used to assess the rate of events for each therapeutic intervention., Results: The median and mean follow-up times were 45 and 30 months, respectively (range, 3 to 217 months). The median overall survival (OS) time after diagnosis of BI-ALCL was 13 years, and the OS rate was 93% and 89% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Patients with lymphoma confined by the fibrous capsule surrounding the implant had better event-free survival (EFS) and OS than did patients with lymphoma that had spread beyond the capsule (P = .03). Patients who underwent a complete surgical excision that consisted of total capsulectomy with breast implant removal had better OS (P = .022) and EFS (P = .014) than did patients who received partial capsulectomy, systemic chemotherapy, or radiation therapy., Conclusion: Surgical management with complete surgical excision is essential to achieve optimal EFS in patients with BI-ALCL., Competing Interests: Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article., (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Tumor cells evade immune destruction, at least partially, by upregulating inhibitory signals to limit effector T cell activation. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is one of the most critical co-inhibitory molecules limiting the T-cell antitumor response. PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, are overexpressed by various types of tumors as well as reactive cells in the tumor microenvironment. A growing body of evidence has shown the clinical efficiency and minimal toxicity of PD-1 pathway inhibitors in patients with solid tumors, but the role of these inhibitors in lymphoid malignancies is much less well studied. In this review, we analyze the pathologic role of the PD-1 pathway in most common lymphoid malignancies and we organize the clinical data from clinical trials of PD-1 pathway inhibitors. Several anti-PD-1 regimens have shown encouraging therapeutic effects in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Additional progress is needed to foster an improved understanding of the role of anti-PD-1 therapy in reconstituting antitumor immunity in patients with lymphoid malignancies. Upcoming trials will explore the clinical efficiency of combining PD-1 pathway inhibitors and various agents with diverse mechanisms of action and create more therapeutic possibilities for afflicted patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a recently described clinicopathologic entity that usually presents as an effusion-associated fibrous capsule surrounding an implant. Less frequently, it presents as a mass. The natural history of this disease and long-term outcomes are unknown., Patients and Methods: We reviewed the literature for all published cases of breast implant-associated ALCL from 1997 to December 2012 and contacted corresponding authors to update clinical follow-up., Results: The median overall survival (OS) for 60 patients was 12 years (median follow-up, 2 years; range, 0-14 years). Capsulectomy and implant removal was performed on 56 of 60 patients (93%). Therapeutic data were available for 55 patients: 39 patients (78%) received systemic chemotherapy, and of the 16 patients (28%) who did not receive chemotherapy, 12 patients opted for watchful waiting and four patients received radiation therapy alone. Thirty-nine (93%) of 42 patients with disease confined by the fibrous capsule achieved complete remission, compared with complete remission in 13 (72%) of 18 patients with a tumor mass. Patients with a breast mass had worse OS and progression-free survival (PFS; P = .052 and P = .03, respectively). The OS or PFS were similar between patients who received and did not receive chemotherapy (P = .44 and P = .28, respectively)., Conclusion: Most patients with breast implant-associated ALCL who had disease confined within the fibrous capsule achieved complete remission. Proper management for these patients may be limited to capsulectomy and implant removal. Patients who present with a mass have a more aggressive clinical course that may be fatal, justifying cytotoxic chemotherapy in addition to removal of implants.