124 results on '"Le Doare K."'
Search Results
2. An open-label, phase IV randomised controlled trial of two schedules of a four-component meningococcal B vaccine in UK preterm infants.
- Author
-
Calvert A, Andrews N, Barlow S, Borrow R, Black C, Bromage B, Carr J, Clarke P, Collinson AC, Few K, Hayward N, Jones CE, Le Doare K, Ladhani SN, Louth J, Papadopoulou G, Pople M, Scorrer T, Snape MD, and Heath PT
- Subjects
- Humans, United Kingdom, Male, Female, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Antibodies, Bacterial blood, Meningococcal Infections prevention & control, Meningococcal Infections immunology, Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B immunology, Meningococcal Vaccines administration & dosage, Meningococcal Vaccines immunology, Infant, Premature immunology, Immunization Schedule
- Abstract
Objective: To compare immunological responses of preterm infants to a four-component meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero) following a 2+1 vs a 3+1 schedule, and to describe reactogenicity of routine vaccines., Design: An open-label, phase IV randomised study conducted across six UK sites., Setting: Neonatal units, postnatal wards, community recruitment following discharge., Participants: 129 preterm infants born at a gestation of <35 weeks (64 in group 1 (2+1), 65 in group 2 (3+1)) were included in the analysis. Analysis was completed for postprimary samples from 125 participants (59 in group 1, 66 in group 2) and for postbooster samples from 118 participants (59 in both groups)., Interventions: Infants randomised to 4CMenB according to a 2+1 or a 3+1 schedule, alongside routine vaccines., Main Outcome Measures: Serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assays performed at 5, 12 and 13 months of age: geometric mean titres (GMTs) and proportions of infants achieving titres ≥4 compared between groups., Results: There were no significant differences in SBA GMTs between infants receiving a 2+1 compared with a 3+1 schedule following primary or booster vaccination, but a significantly higher proportion of infants had an SBA titre ≥4 against strain NZ98/254 (porin A) at 1 month after primary vaccination using a 3+1 compared with a 2+1 schedule (3+1: 87% (95% CI 76 to 94%), 2+1: 70% (95% CI 56 to 81%), p=0.03).At 12 weeks of age those in the 3+1 group, who received a dose of 4CMenB, had significantly more episodes of fever >38.0°C than those in the 2+1 group who did not (group 2+1: 2% (n=1); 3+1: 14% (n=9); p=0.02)., Conclusions: Both schedules were immunogenic in preterm infants, although a lower response against strain NZ98/254 was seen in the 2+1 schedule; ongoing disease surveillance is important in understanding the clinical significance of this difference., Trial Registration Number: NCT03125616., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JL and RB perform contract research on behalf of UKHSA for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Pfizer and Sanofi. JC works for an institution which conducts meningococcal vaccine research on behalf of GSK; he receives no personal payment or inducement of any kind. MS was an employee of the University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals Foundation NHS trust up until September 2022, and in this role acted as an investigator for clinical research studies funded or otherwise supported by the vaccine manufacturers GSK, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novavax and MCM vaccines. He received no personal financial benefit for this work. As of September 2022, MS has been an employee of Moderna UK and holds equity in this company; however, all study activities and data analysis were completed before this date., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Corrigendum: SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in pregnant women in Kilifi, Kenya from March 2020 to March 2022.
- Author
-
Koech A, Omuse G, Mugo AG, Mwaniki IG, Mutunga JM, Mukhanya MW, Wanje O, Mwashigadi GM, Katana GG, Craik R, von Dadelszen P, Le Doare K, and Temmerman M
- Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1292932.]., (Copyright © 2024 Koech, Omuse, Mugo, Mwaniki, Mutunga, Mukhanya, Wanje, Mwashigadi, Katana, Craik, von Dadelszen, Le Doare, Temmerman, periCOVID-Africa and The PRECISE Network.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Interlaboratory comparison of a multiplex immunoassay that measures human serum IgG antibodies against six-group B streptococcus polysaccharides.
- Author
-
Le Doare K, Gaylord MA, Anderson AS, Andrews N, Baker CJ, Bolcen S, Felek A, Giardina PC, Grube CD, Hall T, Hallis B, Izu A, Madhi SA, Maniatis P, Matheson M, Mawas F, McKeen A, Rhodes J, Alston B, Patel P, Schrag S, Simon R, Tan CY, Taylor S, Kwatra G, and Gorringe A
- Subjects
- Infant, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Immunoassay, Polysaccharides, Streptococcus agalactiae, Immunoglobulin G, Guillain-Barre Syndrome
- Abstract
Measurement of IgG antibodies against group B streptococcus (GBS) capsular polysaccharide (CPS) by use of a standardized and internationally accepted multiplex immunoassay is important for the evaluation of candidate maternal GBS vaccines in order to compare results across studies. A standardized assay is also required if serocorrelates of protection against invasive GBS disease are to be established in infant sera for the six predominant GBS serotypes since it would permit the comparison of results across the six serotypes. We undertook an interlaboratory study across five laboratories that used standardized assay reagents and protocols with a panel of 44 human sera to measure IgG antibodies against GBS CPS serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, and V. The within-laboratory intermediate precision, which included factors like the lot of coated beads, laboratory analyst, and day, was generally below 20% relative standard deviation (RSD) for all six serotypes, across all five laboratories. The cross-laboratory reproducibility was < 25% RSD for all six serotypes, which demonstrated the consistency of results across the different laboratories. Additionally, anti-CPS IgG concentrations for the 44-member human serum panel were established. The results of this study showed assay robustness and that the resultant anti-CPS IgG concentrations were reproducible across laboratories for the six GBS CPS serotypes when the standardized assay was used.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The role of vaccines in reducing antimicrobial resistance: A review of potential impact of vaccines on AMR and insights across 16 vaccines and pathogens.
- Author
-
Hasso-Agopsowicz M, Sparrow E, Cameron AM, Sati H, Srikantiah P, Gottlieb S, Bentsi-Enchill A, Le Doare K, Hamel M, Giersing BK, and Hausdorff WP
- Subjects
- Humans, Vaccines immunology, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Vaccine Development, Bacterial Vaccines immunology, Bacterial Vaccines administration & dosage, Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology
- Abstract
In 2019, an estimated 4.95 million deaths were linked to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Vaccines can prevent many of these deaths by averting both drug-sensitive and resistant infections, reducing antibiotic usage, and lowering the likelihood of developing resistance genes. However, their role in mitigating AMR is currently underutilized. This article builds upon previous research that utilizes Vaccine Value Profiles-tools that assess the health, socioeconomic, and societal impact of pathogens-to inform vaccine development. We analyze the effects of 16 pathogens, covered by Vaccine Value Profiles, on AMR, and explore how vaccines could reduce AMR. The article also provides insights into vaccine development and usage. Vaccines are crucial in lessening the impact of infectious diseases and curbing the development of AMR. To fully realize their potential, vaccines must be more prominently featured in the overall strategy to combat AMR. This requires ongoing investment in research and development of new vaccines and the implementation of additional prevention and control measures to address this global threat effectively., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Vaccine value profile for Klebsiella pneumoniae.
- Author
-
Dangor Z, Benson N, Berkley JA, Bielicki J, Bijsma MW, Broad J, Buurman ET, Cross A, Duffy EM, Holt KE, Iroh Tam PY, Jit M, Karampatsas K, Katwere M, Kwatra G, Laxminarayan R, Le Doare K, Mboizi R, Micoli F, Moore CE, Nakabembe E, Naylor NR, O'Brien S, Olwagen C, Reddy D, Rodrigues C, Rosen DA, Sadarangani M, Srikantiah P, Tennant SM, Hasso-Agopsowicz M, and Madhi SA
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Pregnancy, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Vaccination methods, Bacterial Vaccines immunology, Bacterial Vaccines administration & dosage, Klebsiella Infections prevention & control, Klebsiella Infections epidemiology, Klebsiella pneumoniae immunology, Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenicity, Klebsiella pneumoniae drug effects
- Abstract
Klebsiella pneumoniae causes community- and healthcare-associated infections in children and adults. Globally in 2019, an estimated 1.27 million (95% Uncertainty Interval [UI]: 0.91-1.71) and 4.95 million (95% UI: 3.62-6.57) deaths were attributed to and associated with bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR), respectively. K. pneumoniae was the second leading pathogen in deaths attributed to AMR resistant bacteria. Furthermore, the rise of antimicrobial resistance in both community- and hospital-acquired infections is a concern for neonates and infants who are at high risk for invasive bacterial disease. There is a limited antibiotic pipeline for new antibiotics to treat multidrug resistant infections, and vaccines targeted against K. pneumoniae are considered to be of priority by the World Health Organization. Vaccination of pregnant women against K. pneumoniae could reduce the risk of invasive K.pneumoniae disease in their young offspring. In addition, vulnerable children, adolescents and adult populations at risk of K. pneumoniae disease with underlying diseases such as immunosuppression from underlying hematologic malignancy, chemotherapy, patients undergoing abdominal and/or urinary surgical procedures, or prolonged intensive care management are also potential target groups for a K. pneumoniae vaccine. A 'Vaccine Value Profile' (VVP) for K.pneumoniae, which contemplates vaccination of pregnant women to protect their babies from birth through to at least three months of age and other high-risk populations, provides a high-level, holistic assessment of the available information to inform the potential public health, economic and societal value of a pipeline of K. pneumoniae vaccines and other preventatives and therapeutics. This VVP was developed by a working group of subject matter experts from academia, non-profit organizations, public-private partnerships, and multi-lateral organizations, and in collaboration with stakeholders from the WHO. All contributors have extensive expertise on various elements of the K.pneumoniae VVP and collectively aimed to identify current research and knowledge gaps. The VVP was developed using only existing and publicly available information., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ziyaad Dangor reports financial support was provided by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Ziyaad Dangor reports financial support was provided by World Health Organization. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. GBS vaccines in the UK: a round table discussion.
- Author
-
Thorn N, Guy RL, Karampatsas K, Powell M, Walker KF, Plumb J, Khalil A, Greening V, Eccleston E, Trotter C, Andrews N, Rush L, Sharkey C, Wallis L, Heath P, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Humans, United Kingdom epidemiology, Female, Streptococcal Vaccines therapeutic use, Streptococcal Vaccines immunology, Streptococcal Infections prevention & control, Streptococcal Infections epidemiology, Streptococcus agalactiae immunology
- Abstract
Background: Group B streptococcus (GBS) remains a leading cause of infant sepsis, meningitis and death despite intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. A vaccine is urgently required, and two candidates are in advanced clinical trials. For successful GBS vaccine implementation, especially if a vaccine is licensed based on an immunological threshold, there must be cross-sector engagement, effective advocacy, robust plans for phase IV studies and equitable access., Meeting: A round-table discussion, held at St George's University of London, reviewed the current position of GBS vaccines in the UK context, focusing on phase IV plans, convening a diverse group of stakeholders from across the UK, with a role in GBS vaccine licensure, advocacy, implementation or effectiveness evaluation.Presentations outlined the latest UK epidemiology, noting the rising infant invasive GBS (iGBS) infection rates from 1996 to 2021 for both early and late onset disease, with the highest disease rates in Black infants (1.1/1000 livebirths vs white infants (0.81/1000 livebirths). Potential coverage of the candidate vaccines was high (>95%). Regulatory input suggested that EU regulators would consider waiving the need for a pre-licensure efficacy study if a putative correlate of protection could be adequately justified. Phase IV study methodologies for a GBS vaccine were considered, largely based on previous UK maternal vaccine assessments, such as a nationwide cohort study design using a vaccine register and a maternal services dataset. Other strategies were also discussed such as a cluster or stepped-wedge randomised trial to evaluate implementation outcomes. Opportunities for advocacy, education and engagement with additional key partners were discussed and identified., Conclusions: With an approved GBS vaccine a near possibility, planning of phase IV studies and identification of critical barriers to implementation are urgently needed. Cross-sector engagement is essential and will facilitate a successful pathway., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2024 Thorn N et al.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Antibody kinetics between birth and three months of life in healthy infants with natural exposure to Group B streptococcus: A UK cohort study.
- Author
-
Karampatsas K, Hall T, Voysey M, Carreras-Abad C, Cochet M, Ramkhelawon L, Peregrine E, Andrews N, Heath PT, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Humans, Infant, Female, Infant, Newborn, Male, United Kingdom, Fetal Blood immunology, Cohort Studies, Pregnancy, Adult, Serogroup, Immunity, Maternally-Acquired, Antibodies, Bacterial blood, Antibodies, Bacterial immunology, Streptococcus agalactiae immunology, Immunoglobulin G blood, Streptococcal Infections immunology
- Abstract
Introduction: Capsular polysaccharide (CPS) serotype-specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in cord blood has been proposed as a correlate of protection against invasive Group B Streptococcus (iGBS) disease. Although protective levels are required in infants throughout the window of vulnerability up to 3 months of age, little is known regarding the kinetics of GBS-specific IgG over this period., Methods: We enrolled 33 healthy infants born to mothers colonized with GBS. We collected cord blood and infant blood samples either at one (21-35 days), two (49-63 days), or three months of age (77-91 days). We measured GBS serotype-specific CPS IgG concentrations and calculated the decay rate using a mixed-effects model. We further explored whether the antibody kinetics were affected by common maternal and infant factors and estimated the correlation between IgG concentration at birth and one, two, and three months of age., Results: The half-life estimate of IgG concentration for homologous and non-homologous GBS serotypes in paired samples with detectable IgG levels at both time points was 27.4 (95 % CI: 23.5-32.9) days. The decay rate did not vary by maternal age (p = 0.7), ethnicity (p = 0.1), gravida (p = 0.1), gestation (p = 0.7), and infant sex (p = 0.1). Predicted IgG titres above the assay lower limit of quantification on day 30 strongly correlated with titres at birth (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.71 [95 % CI: 0.60-0.80])., Conclusion: Our results provide a basis for future investigations into the use of antibody kinetics in defining a serocorrelate of protection against late-onset iGBS disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Paul Heath reports financial support was provided by National Institute for Health Research. MV is a contributor to intellectual property licensed by Oxford University Innovation to AstraZeneca. PTH has conducted studies on behalf of St George’s University of London funded by GBS vaccine manufacturers, including Minervax and Pfizer, but receives no personal funding for these activities. KLD is supported by Future Leaders Fellowships by UK Research and Innovation Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/S016570/1) and has conducted studies on behalf of St George’s University of London funded by GBS vaccine manufacturers, including Minervax and Pfizer, but receives no personal funding for these activities. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.]., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier India Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Data challenges for international health emergencies: lessons learned from ten international COVID-19 driver projects.
- Author
-
Boylan S, Arsenault C, Barreto M, Bozza FA, Fonseca A, Forde E, Hookham L, Humphreys GS, Ichihara MY, Le Doare K, Liu XF, McNamara E, Mugunga JC, Oliveira JF, Ouma J, Postlethwaite N, Retford M, Reyes LF, Morris AD, and Wozencraft A
- Subjects
- Humans, International Cooperation, Emergencies, Pandemics, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 epidemiology, Information Dissemination methods, Global Health
- Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of international data sharing and access to improve health outcomes for all. The International COVID-19 Data Alliance (ICODA) programme enabled 12 exemplar or driver projects to use existing health-related data to address major research questions relating to the pandemic, and developed data science approaches that helped each research team to overcome challenges, accelerate the data research cycle, and produce rapid insights and outputs. These approaches also sought to address inequity in data access and use, test approaches to ethical health data use, and make summary datasets and outputs accessible to a wider group of researchers. This Health Policy paper focuses on the challenges and lessons learned from ten of the ICODA driver projects, involving researchers from 19 countries and a range of health-related datasets. The ICODA programme reviewed the time taken for each project to complete stages of the health data research cycle and identified common challenges in areas such as data sharing agreements and data curation. Solutions included provision of standard data sharing templates, additional data curation expertise at an early stage, and a trusted research environment that facilitated data sharing across national boundaries and reduced risk. These approaches enabled the driver projects to rapidly produce research outputs, including publications, shared code, dashboards, and innovative resources, which can all be accessed and used by other research teams to address global health challenges., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests All coauthors (except EF) received funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Minderoo Foundation for the ICODA initiative. KLD received grant funding for the main project from the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) 2 programme supported by the European Union (RIA2020EF-2926 periCOVID Africa). LFR received grants from Pfizer and Merck Sharp & Dohme; consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and GSK; payment for lectures and presentations from Merck Sharp & Dohme and GSK; and payment for expert testimony from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and GSK. MYI received grant funding from the Ministry of Health (decentralised executive term, process number 25000200517/2019-46), National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), and the Wellcome Trust; and payment to participate in the International Population Data Linkage Network Conference from the NIHR Global Health Research Program Award. MB received grants from the London School of Economics, The Rockefeller Foundation, Global Challenges Research Fund Global Multimorbidity, and Google; has received consultancy fees from the Singapore Institute of Management; and has a patent from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association. AF has received grants from the Ministry of Health, NIHR, and the Wellcome Trust. GSH received funding from the Gates Foundation contract for contract work unrelated to the contents of the manuscript; consultancy fees from Vivli clinical data sharing platform and ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com clinical data sharing platform; and fees from the National Institute on Ageing to present at their data sharing workshop. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Risk of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Preterm Infants.
- Author
-
Calvert A, Campbell H, Heath PT, Jones CE, Le Doare K, Mensah A, and Ladhani S
- Abstract
Background: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is most common in the first year of life. We hypothesized that preterm infants may have a higher risk of IMD and more severe disease than term infants. We compared the incidence, demographics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of IMD in preterm compared with term infants during the first 5 years after implementation of a national meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB) for infants in England., Methods: The UK Health Security Agency conducts enhanced national IMD surveillance with detailed follow-up of all confirmed cases in England. Infants aged <1 year (uncorrected for gestational age) with IMD confirmed between 1 September 2015 and 31 August 2020 were included., Results: There were 393 infant IMD cases (incidence, 12.4/100 000 live births). Among 363 (92.4%) of the infants with known gestational age, the IMD incidence was higher in preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) than in term infants (18.3/100 000 vs 10.9/100 000; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.68 [95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.29]; P = .001). The IMD incidence was highest in those born at <32 weeks' gestation (32.9/100 000; incidence rate ratio for <32 weeks' gestation vs term, 3.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.73-5.24]; P ≤ .001). There were no differences in demographics, clinical presentation, rate of intensive care admission, or case-fatality rate, but preterm infants were more likely than term infants to have ≥1 reported sequela (14 of 39 [35.9%] vs 51 of 268 [19.0%]; P = .02)., Conclusions: Preterm infants had a higher incidence of IMD than term infants and the IMD incidence was highest in infants born at <32 weeks' gestation. Preterm infants also had a higher risk of IMD sequelae., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Paediatric, maternal, and congenital mpox: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Sanchez Clemente N, Coles C, Paixao ES, Brickley EB, Whittaker E, Alfven T, Rulisa S, Agudelo Higuita N, Torpiano P, Agravat P, Thorley EV, Drysdale SB, Le Doare K, and Muyembe Tamfum JJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Child, Child, Preschool, Infant, Infant, Newborn
- Abstract
Background: Although mpox has been detected in paediatric populations in central and west Africa for decades, evidence synthesis on paediatric, maternal, and congenital mpox, and the use of vaccines and therapeutics in these groups, is lacking. A systematic review is therefore indicated to set the research agenda., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching articles in Embase, Global Health, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and WHO databases from inception to April 17, 2023. We included studies reporting primary data on at least one case of confirmed, suspected, or probable paediatric, maternal, or congenital mpox in humans or the use of third-generation smallpox or mpox vaccines, targeted antivirals, or immune therapies in at least one case in our population of interest. We included clinical trials and observational studies in humans and excluded reviews, commentaries, and grey literature. A pooled estimate of the paediatric case fatality ratio was obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420223336648)., Findings: Of the 61 studies, 53 reported paediatric outcomes (n=2123 cases), seven reported maternal or congenital outcomes (n=32 cases), two reported vaccine safety (n=28 recipients), and three reported transmission during breastfeeding (n=4 cases). While a subset of seven observational studies (21 children and 12 pregnant individuals) reported uneventful treatment with tecovirimat, there were no randomised trials reporting safety or efficacy for any therapeutic agent. Among children, the commonest clinical features included rash (86 [100%] of 86), fever (63 [73%] of 86), and lymphadenopathy (40 [47%] of 86). Among pregnant individuals, rash was reported in 23 (100%) of 23; fever and lymphadenopathy were less common (six [26%] and three [13%] of 23, respectively). Most paediatric complications (12 [60%] of 20) arose from secondary bacterial infections. The pooled paediatric case fatality ratio was 11% (95% CI 4-20), I
2 =75%. Data from 12 pregnancies showed half resulted in fetal death. Research on vaccine and immune globulin safety remains scarce for children and absent for pregnant individuals., Interpretation: Our review highlights critical knowledge gaps in the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of mpox in children and pregnant individuals, especially those residing in endemic countries. Increased funding, international collaboration, and equitable research is needed to inform mpox control strategies tailored for at-risk communities in endemic countries., Funding: None., Translations: For the French, Spanish and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SBD has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi for taking part in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) advisory boards and has provided consultancy and/or investigator roles in relation to product development for Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Valneva, MSD, iLiAD, and Sanofi with fees paid to St George's, University of London. SBD is a member of the UK Department of Health and Social Care's (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) RSV subcommittee and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's (MHRA) Paediatric Medicine Expert Advisory Group (PMEAG), but the reviews expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of DHSC, JCVI, MHRA, or PMEAG. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Seroepidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of pregnant women and their infants in Uganda and Malawi.
- Author
-
Hookham L, Cantrell L, Cose S, Freyne B, Gadama L, Imede E, Kawaza K, Lissauer S, Musoke P, Nankabirwa V, Sekikubo M, Sommerfelt H, Voysey M, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Infant, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, SARS-CoV-2, Pregnant Women, Prospective Studies, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Malawi epidemiology, Cohort Studies, Uganda epidemiology, Placenta, COVID-19 epidemiology, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious epidemiology, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and infancy has accumulated throughout the course of the pandemic, though evidence regarding asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse birth outcomes are scarce. Limited information is available from countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The pregnant woman and infant COVID in Africa study (PeriCOVID Africa) is a South-South-North partnership involving hospitals and health centres in five countries: Malawi, Uganda, Mozambique, The Gambia, and Kenya. The study leveraged data from three ongoing prospective cohort studies: Preparing for Group B Streptococcal Vaccines (GBS PREPARE), SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 in women and their infants in Kampala and Mukono (COMAC) and Pregnancy Care Integrating Translational Science Everywhere (PRECISE). In this paper we describe the seroepidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women enrolled in sites in Uganda and Malawi, and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy and infant outcomes., Outcome: Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in maternal blood, reported as the proportion of seropositive women by study site and wave of COVID-19 within each country., Methods: The PeriCOVID study was a prospective mother-infant cohort study that recruited pregnant women at any gestation antenatally or on the day of delivery. Maternal and cord blood samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using Wantai and Euroimmune ELISA. In periCOVID Uganda and Malawi nose and throat swabs for SARS-Cov-2 RT-PCR were obtained., Results: In total, 1379 women were enrolled, giving birth to 1387 infants. Overall, 63% of pregnant women had a SARS-CoV-2 positive serology. Over subsequent waves (delta and omicron), in the absence of vaccination, seropositivity rose from 20% to over 80%. The placental transfer GMR was 1.7, indicating active placental transfer of anti-spike IgG. There was no association between SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity and adverse pregnancy or infancy outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Hookham et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Defining and reporting adverse events of special interest in comparative maternal vaccine studies: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Davies HG, Thorley EV, Al-Bahadili R, Sutton N, Burt J, Hookham L, Karampatsas K, Lambach P, Muñoz F, Cutland CL, Omer S, and Le Doare K
- Abstract
Introduction: The GAIA (Global Alignment on Immunisation Safety Assessment in Pregnancy) consortium was established in 2014 with the aim of creating a standardised, globally coordinated approach to monitoring the safety of vaccines administered in pregnancy. The consortium developed twenty-six standardised definitions for classifying obstetric and infant adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the current state of adverse event reporting in maternal vaccine trials following the publication of the case definitions by GAIA, and the extent to which these case definitions have been adopted in maternal vaccine safety research., Methods: A comprehensive search of published literature was undertaken to identify maternal vaccine research studies. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and keyword searches to identify observational or interventional studies that examined vaccine safety in pregnant women with a comparator group. A two-reviewer screening process was undertaken, and a narrative synthesis of the results presented., Results: 14,737 titles were identified from database searches, 435 titles were selected as potentially relevant, 256 were excluded, the remaining 116 papers were included. Influenza vaccine was the most studied (25.0%), followed by TDaP (20.7%) and SARS-CoV-2 (12.9%).Ninety-one studies (78.4%) were conducted in high-income settings. Forty-eight (41.4%) utilised electronic health-records. The majority focused on reporting adverse events of special interest (AESI) in pregnancy (65.0%) alone or in addition to reactogenicity (27.6%). The most frequently reported AESI were preterm birth, small for gestational age and hypertensive disorders. Fewer than 10 studies reported use of GAIA definitions. Gestational age assessment was poorly described; of 39 studies reporting stillbirths 30.8% provided no description of the gestational age threshold., Conclusions: Low-income settings remain under-represented in comparative maternal vaccine safety research. There has been poor uptake of GAIA case definitions. A lack of harmonisation and standardisation persists limiting comparability of the generated safety data., Competing Interests: Financial support for this work was provided by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership. Clare Cutland and Flor Muñoz were involved in leading the GAIA definition development. Hannah Davies is involved in the GAIA definition revision process., (© 2024 The Authors.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. The safety and immunogenicity of vaccines administered to pregnant women living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Nakabembe E, Cooper J, Amaral K, Tusubira V, Hsia Y, Abu-Raya B, Sekikubo M, Nakimuli A, Sadarangani M, and Le Doare K
- Abstract
Background: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants have a higher burden of infectious diseases related morbidity and mortality compared with HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU). Immunization of pregnant women living with HIV (PWLWH) could reduce the severity and burden of infectious diseases for HEU in early infancy., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of safety and immunogenicity of vaccines administered to PWLWH and meta-analyses to test the overall effect of immunogenicity comparing pregnant women without HIV (PWWH) to PWLWH. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Review articles, case series, conference abstracts, and animal studies were excluded. Studies were included from inception to 6th September 2023, with no language restrictions. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for immunogenicity using Review manager (RevMan) analysis software version 5.4.1, Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) values were transformed to obtain the mean and standard deviation within RevMan, the effect size was computed and reported as mean difference with respective 95% confidence intervals. The review was registered with PROSPERO CRD42021289081., Findings: We included 12 articles, comprising 3744 pregnant women, 1714 were PWLWH given either influenza, pneumococcal or an investigational Group B streptococcal (GBS) vaccine. Five studies described safety outcomes, and no increase in adverse events was reported in PWLWH compared to PWWH. The GMT increase from baseline to 28-35 weeks post vaccination in HA units ranged from 12.4 (95% CI: 9.84-14.9) to 238.8 (95% CI: 0.35-477.9). Meta-analyses of influenza vaccines showed the pooled geometric mean difference in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) titers post vaccination was 56.01 (95% CI: 45.01-67.01), p < 0.001. The increase was less in PWLWH when compared with PWWH: -141.76 (95% CI: -194.96, -88.55), p < 0.001., Interpretation: There are limited data on the safety and immunogenicity of vaccines given to PWLWH making policy consideration in this group difficult when new vaccines are introduced. With new vaccines on the horizon, PWLWH need to be included in studies to promote vaccine confidence for this special population., Funding: This work was funded by Medical Research Council Joint Clinical Trials Round 9 [MR/T004983/1]., Competing Interests: EN received clinical research stipend from MRC Joint Clinical Trials Round 9 [MR/T004983/1]. KLD is funded by a United Kingdom Research Institute Future Leaders Fellowship. KLD has been an investigator for projects funded by Pfizer and Minervax. All funds have been paid to her institution and she has not received personal payments of any kind. MSa is supported via salary awards from the BC Children’s Hospital Foundation and Michael Smith Health Research BC. MSa has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer,Sanofi-Pasteur,Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. BA has received honoraria for participation in meetings organized by Sanofi, relating to pertussis and RSV. All other authors report no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. The immunogenicity and safety of Group B Streptococcal maternal vaccines: A systematic review.
- Author
-
Bjerkhaug AU, Ramalingham S, Mboizi R, Le Doare K, and Klingenberg C
- Subjects
- Infant, Adult, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Female, Pregnancy, Vaccination adverse effects, Streptococcus agalactiae, Immunoglobulin G, Immunogenicity, Vaccine, Placenta, Vaccines
- Abstract
Purpose: To systematically review immunogenicity and safety data of maternal group B streptococcal (GBS) vaccines in published clinical trials until July 2023., Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov. databases were searched for clinical studies that reported immunogenicity and/or safety of GBS vaccine in non-pregnant adults, pregnant women and infants between 1st of January 1996 to 31st of July 2023. Pairs of reviewers independently selected, data extracted, and assessed the risk of bias of the studies. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. (PROSPERO CRD42020185213)., Results: We retrieved 1472 records from the literature search; 20 studies and 6 sub-studies were included, involving 4440 non-pregnant participants and 1325 pregnant women with their newborns. There was a significantly higher IgG Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) and IgG placental transfer ratios in vaccinated compared to placebo groups, with peak response 4-8 weeks after vaccination. Placental transfer ratio varied from 0.4 to 1.4 across five studies. The different clinical trials used different assays that limited direct comparison. There were no significant differences in the risk of serious adverse events (adjusted OR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.49-1.07), serious adverse events leading to withdrawal (adjusted OR 0.44; 95 % CI 0.13-1.51), and systemic illness or fever (adjusted OR 1.05; 95 % CI 0.26-4.19) between the vaccine and placebo groups., Conclusions: The published clinical trials show significant IgG GMC response in subjects receiving the conjugated capsular polysaccharide and surface subunit protein vaccines compared to placebo. In current clinical trials of experimental GBS maternal vaccines, there have been no observed serious adverse events of special interest directly linked to vaccination., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors AUB, SR and RM declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. CK is involved in a seroepidemiologocal study, partly funded by Pfizer, but does no receive personal honoraria in this study. KLD’s University has received funds from Pfizer, Minervax and GSK for unrelated vaccine work. KLD has received no personal honoraria., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Refining estimates of neurodevelopmental impairment after group B streptococcal sepsis and meningitis in infancy.
- Author
-
Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Infant, Humans, Streptococcus agalactiae, Meningitis, Sepsis, Meningitis, Bacterial
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in pregnant women in Kilifi, Kenya from March 2020 to March 2022.
- Author
-
Koech A, Omuse G, Mugo AG, Mwaniki IG, Mutunga JM, Mukhanya MW, Wanje O, Mwashigadi GM, Katana GG, Craik R, von Dadelszen P, Le Doare K, and Temmerman M
- Subjects
- Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Kenya epidemiology, Cohort Studies, SARS-CoV-2, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Antibodies, Viral, Immunoglobulin G, Pregnant Women, COVID-19 epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Seroprevalence studies are an alternative approach to estimating the extent of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and the evolution of the pandemic in different geographical settings. We aimed to determine the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence from March 2020 to March 2022 in a rural and urban setting in Kilifi County, Kenya., Methods: We obtained representative random samples of stored serum from a pregnancy cohort study for the period March 2020 to March 2022 and tested for antibodies against the spike protein using a qualitative SARS-CoV-2 ELISA kit (Wantai, total antibodies). All positive samples were retested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies (Euroimmun, ELISA kits, NCP, qualitative, IgG) and anti-spike protein antibodies (Euroimmun, ELISA kits, QuantiVac; quantitative, IgG)., Results: A total of 2,495 (of 4,703 available) samples were tested. There was an overall trend of increasing seropositivity from a low of 0% [95% CI 0-0.06] in March 2020 to a high of 89.4% [95% CI 83.36-93.82] in Feb 2022. Of the Wantai test-positive samples, 59.7% [95% CI 57.06-62.34] tested positive by the Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 NCP test and 37.4% [95% CI 34.83-40.04] tested positive by the Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 QuantiVac test. No differences were observed between the urban and rural hospital but villages adjacent to the major highway traversing the study area had a higher seroprevalence., Conclusion: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rose rapidly, with most of the population exposed to SARS-CoV-2 within 23 months of the first cases. The high cumulative seroprevalence suggests greater population exposure to SARS-CoV-2 than that reported from surveillance data., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Koech, Omuse, Mugo, Mwaniki, Mutunga, Mukhanya, Wanje, Mwashigadi, Katana, Craik, von Dadelszen, Le Doare, Temmerman, periCOVID-Africa and The PRECISE Network.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Antibody and B-cell Immune Responses Against Bordetella Pertussis Following Infection and Immunization.
- Author
-
Abu-Raya B, Esser MJ, Nakabembe E, Reiné J, Amaral K, Diks AM, Imede E, Way SS, Harandi AM, Gorringe A, Le Doare K, Halperin SA, Berkowska MA, and Sadarangani M
- Subjects
- Humans, Infant, Immunity, Immunization, Vaccine Development, Antibodies, Bacterial immunology, Bordetella pertussis immunology, Pertussis Vaccine immunology, Whooping Cough immunology
- Abstract
Neither immunization nor recovery from natural infection provides life-long protection against Bordetella pertussis. Replacement of a whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine with an acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine, mutations in B. pertussis strains, and better diagnostic techniques, contribute to resurgence of number of cases especially in young infants. Development of new immunization strategies relies on a comprehensive understanding of immune system responses to infection and immunization and how triggering these immune components would ensure protective immunity. In this review, we assess how B cells, and their secretory products, antibodies, respond to B. pertussis infection, current and novel vaccines and highlight similarities and differences in these responses. We first focus on antibody-mediated immunity. We discuss antibody (sub)classes, elaborate on antibody avidity, ability to neutralize pertussis toxin, and summarize different effector functions, i.e. ability to activate complement, promote phagocytosis and activate NK cells. We then discuss challenges and opportunities in studying B-cell immunity. We highlight shared and unique aspects of B-cell and plasma cell responses to infection and immunization, and discuss how responses to novel immunization strategies better resemble those triggered by a natural infection (i.e., by triggering responses in mucosa and production of IgA). With this comprehensive review, we aim to shed some new light on the role of B cells and antibodies in the pertussis immunity to guide new vaccine development., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘BA has received honoraria for participation in meetings organized by Sanofi, relating to pertussis and RSV. MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. SH has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, CanSino, Entos, and VBI Vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments.’., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Improving the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis in Resource-Limited Settings: Gaps and Recommendations.
- Author
-
Sturrock S, Sadoo S, Nanyunja C, and Le Doare K
- Abstract
Neonatal sepsis causes significant global morbidity and mortality, with the highest burden in resource-limited settings where 99% of neonatal deaths occur. There are multiple challenges to achieving successful treatment of neonates in this setting. Firstly, reliable and low-cost strategies for risk identification are urgently needed to facilitate treatment as early as possible. Improved laboratory capacity to allow identification of causative organisms would support antimicrobial stewardship. Antibiotic treatment is still hampered by availability, but also increasingly by antimicrobial resistance - making surveillance of organisms and judicious antibiotic use a priority. Finally, supportive care is key in the management of the neonate with sepsis and has been underrecognized as a priority in resource-limited settings. This includes fluid balance and nutritional support in the acute phase, and follow-up care in order to mitigate complications and optimise long-term outcomes. There is much more work to be done in identifying the holistic needs of neonates and their families to provide effective family-integrated interventions and complete the package of neonatal sepsis management in resource-limited settings., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Sturrock et al.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Using electronic medical records to understand the impact of SARS-CoV-2 lockdown measures on maternal and neonatal outcomes in Kampala, Uganda.
- Author
-
Ouma J, Hookham L, Akera LA, Rukundo G, Kyohere M, Kakande A, Nakyesige R, Musoke P, and Le Doare K
- Abstract
Kawempe National Referral Hospital (KNRH) is a tertiary facility with over 21,000 pregnant or postpartum women admitted annually. The hospital, located in Kampala, Uganda, uses an Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system to capture patient data. Used since 2017, this readily available electronic health record (EHR) has the benefit of informing real-time clinical care, especially during pandemics such as COVID-19. We investigated the use of EHR to assess risk factors for adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes that can be incorporated into a data visualization dashboard for real time decision making during pandemics. This study analysed data from the UgandaEMR collected at pre-, during- and post-lockdown timepoints of the COVID-19 pandemic to determine its use in monitoring risk factors for adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors for adverse pregnancy and maternal outcomes including prematurity, obstetric complications, still births and neonatal deaths. Pearson chi-square test was used for pair-wise comparison of the outcomes at the various stages of the pandemic. Data analysis was performed in R, within the International COVID-19 Data Alliance (ICODA) workbench. A visualisation dashboard was developed based on the risk factors, to support decision making and improved healthcare delivery. Comparison of pre-and post-lockdown variables showed an increased risk of pre-term birth (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR = 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-2.01)); obstetric complications (aOR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.53-3.03); immediate neonatal death (aOR = 3.89, 95% CI 2.65-5.72) and Caesarean section (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.34). The significant risk factors for adverse outcomes were younger maternal age and gestational age <32weeks at labour. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using EHR to identify and monitor at-risk subpopulation groups accessing health services in real time. This information is critical for the development of timely and appropriate interventions in outbreaks and pandemic situations., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Ouma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Placental Streptococcus agalactiae DNA is associated with neonatal unit admission and foetal pro-inflammatory cytokines in term infants.
- Author
-
Gaccioli F, Stephens K, Sovio U, Jessop F, Wong HS, Lager S, Cook E, de Goffau MC, Le Doare K, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Charnock-Jones DS, and Smith GCS
- Subjects
- Infant, Newborn, Humans, Pregnancy, Infant, Female, Placenta, Streptococcus agalactiae genetics, Case-Control Studies, Inflammation, Streptococcal Infections, Sepsis
- Abstract
Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus; GBS) is a common cause of sepsis in neonates. Previous work detected GBS DNA in the placenta in ~5% of women before the onset of labour, but the clinical significance of this finding is unknown. Here we re-analysed this dataset as a case control study of neonatal unit (NNU) admission. Of 436 infants born at term (≥37 weeks of gestation), 7/30 with placental GBS and 34/406 without placental GBS were admitted to the NNU (odds ratio (OR) 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-7.8). We then performed a validation study using non-overlapping subjects from the same cohort. This included a further 239 cases of term NNU admission and 686 term controls: 16/36 with placental GBS and 223/889 without GBS were admitted to the NNU (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.6). Of the 36 infants with placental GBS, 10 were admitted to the NNU with evidence of probable but culture-negative sepsis (OR 4.8, 95% CI 2.2-10.3), 2 were admitted with proven GBS sepsis (OR 66.6, 95% CI 7.3-963.7), 6 were admitted and had chorioamnionitis (inflammation of the foetal membranes) (OR 5.3, 95% CI 2.0-13.4), and 5 were admitted and had funisitis (inflammation of the umbilical cord) (OR 6.7, 95% CI 12.5-17.7). Foetal cytokine storm (two or more pro-inflammatory cytokines >10 times median control levels in umbilical cord blood) was present in 36% of infants with placental GBS DNA and 4% of cases where the placenta was negative (OR 14.2, 95% CI 3.6-60.8). Overall, ~1 in 200 term births had GBS detected in the placenta, which was associated with infant NNU admission and morbidity., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. 'Unable to have a proper conversation over the phone about my concerns': a multimethods evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on routine childhood vaccination services in London, UK.
- Author
-
Buck E, Burt J, Karampatsas K, Hsia Y, Whyte G, Amirthalingam G, Skirrow H, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Infant, Child, Humans, London epidemiology, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Immunization, Vaccination, Vaccines, Conjugate, Immunization Schedule, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Haemophilus Vaccines
- Abstract
Objectives: Investigating the completion rate of 12-month vaccinations and parental perspectives on vaccine services during COVID-19., Study-Design: Service evaluation including parental questionnaire., Methods: Uptake of 12-month vaccinations in three London general practices during three periods: pre-COVID (1/3/2018-28/2/2019, n = 826), during COVID (1/3/2019-28/2/2020, n = 775) and post-COVID first wave (1/8/2020-31/1/2021, n = 419). Questionnaire of parents whose children were registered at the practices (1/4/2019-1/22/2021, n = 1350)., Results: Comparing pre-COVID and both COVID cohorts, the completion rates of 12-month vaccines were lower. Haemophilus influenzae type B/meningococcal group C (Hib/MenC) vaccination uptake was 5.6% lower (89.0% vs 83.4%, P=<0.001), meningococcal group B (MenB) booster uptake was 4.4% lower (87.3% vs 82.9%, P = 0.006), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) booster uptake was 6% lower (88.0% vs 82.0%, P < 0.001) and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine uptake was 5.2% lower (89.1% vs 83.9%, P = 0.003). Black/Black-British ethnicity children had increased odds of missing their 12-month vaccinations compared to White ethnicity children (adjusted odds ratio 0.43 [95% confidence interval 0.24-0.79, P = 0.005; 0.36 [0.20-0.65], P < 0.001; 0.48 [0.27-0.87], P = 0.01; 0.40 [0.22-0.73], P = 0.002; for Hib/MenC, MenB booster, PCV booster and MMR. Comparing pre-COVID and COVID periods, vaccinations coded as not booked increased for MMR (10%), MenB (7%) and PCV booster (8%). Parents reported changes to vaccination services during COVID-19, including difficulties booking and attending appointments and lack of vaccination reminders., Conclusion: A sustained decrease in 12-month childhood vaccination uptake disproportionally affected Black/Black British ethnicity infants during the first wave of the pandemic. Vaccination reminders and availability of healthcare professionals to discuss parental vaccine queries are vital to maintaining uptake., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Development of A Standardized Opsonophagocytosis Killing Assay for Group B Streptococcus and Assessment in an Interlaboratory Study.
- Author
-
Leung S, Collett CF, Allen L, Lim S, Maniatis P, Bolcen SJ, Alston B, Patel PY, Kwatra G, Hall T, Thomas S, Taylor S, Le Doare K, and Gorringe A
- Abstract
The placental transfer of antibodies that mediate bacterial clearance via phagocytes is likely important for protection against invasive group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease. A robust functional assay is essential to determine the immune correlates of protection and assist vaccine development. Using standard reagents, we developed and optimized an opsonophagocytic killing assay (OPKA) where dilutions of test sera were incubated with bacteria, baby rabbit complement (BRC) and differentiated HL60 cells (dHL60) for 30 min. Following overnight incubation, the surviving bacteria were enumerated and the % bacterial survival was calculated relative to serum-negative controls. A reciprocal 50% killing titer was then assigned. The minimal concentrations of anti-capsular polysaccharide (CPS) IgG required for 50% killing were 1.65-3.70 ng/mL (depending on serotype). Inhibition of killing was observed using sera absorbed with homologous CPS but not heterologous CPS, indicating specificity for anti-CPS IgG. The assay performance was examined in an interlaboratory study using residual sera from CPS-conjugate vaccine trials with international partners in the Group B Streptococcus Assay STandardisatiON (GASTON) Consortium. Strong correlations of reported titers between laboratories were observed: ST-Ia r = 0.88, ST-Ib r = 0.91, ST-II r = 0.91, ST-III r = 0.90 and ST-V r = 0.94. The OPKA is an easily transferable assay with accessible standard reagents and will be a valuable tool to assess GBS-specific antibodies in natural immunity and vaccine studies.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Vaccine value profile for Group B streptococcus.
- Author
-
Trotter CL, Alderson M, Dangor Z, Ip M, Le Doare K, Nakabembe E, Procter SR, Sekikubo M, and Lambach P
- Subjects
- Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Female, Humans, Streptococcus agalactiae, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control, Streptococcal Infections prevention & control, Streptococcal Vaccines, Meningitis
- Abstract
Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a major global cause of neonatal meningitis, sepsis and pneumonia, with an estimated 91,000 infant deaths per year and an additional 46,000 stillbirths. GBS infection in pregnancy is also associated with adverse maternal outcomes and preterm births. As such, the World Health Organization (WHO) prioritised the development of a GBS vaccine suitable for use in pregnant women and use in LMICs, where the burden of disease is highest. Several GBS vaccines are in clinical development. The WHO Defeating Meningitis by 2030 has set a target of 2026 for vaccine licensure. This 'Vaccine Value Profile' (VVP) for GBS is intended to provide a high-level, holistic assessment of the information and data that are currently available to inform the potential public health, economic and societal value of pipeline vaccines and vaccine-like products. This VVP was developed by a working group of subject matter experts from academia, non-profit organizations, public private partnerships and multi-lateral organizations, and in collaboration with stakeholders from the WHO regions of AFR, AMR, EUR, WPR. All contributors have extensive expertise on various elements of the GBS VVP and collectively aimed to identify current research and knowledge gaps. The VVP was developed using only existing and publicly available information., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus agalactiae in non-pregnant populations: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Founou LL, Khan UB, Medugu N, Pinto TCA, Darboe S, Chendi Z, Founou RC, To KN, Jamrozy D, Karampatsas K, Carr VR, Pepper K, Dangor Z, Ip M, Le Doare K, and Bentley SD
- Subjects
- Pregnancy, Adult, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Female, Molecular Epidemiology, Phylogeny, Databases, Factual, Streptococcus agalactiae genetics, Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Abstract
Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus , GBS) has recently emerged as an important pathogen among adults. However, it is overlooked in this population, with all global efforts being directed towards its containment among pregnant women and neonates. This systematic review assessed the molecular epidemiology and compared how the lineages circulating among non-pregnant populations relate to those of pregnant and neonatal populations worldwide. A systematic search was performed across nine databases from 1 January 2000 up to and including 20 September 2021, with no language restrictions. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool (PCAT) was used to assess the quality of included studies. The global population structure of GBS from the non-pregnant population was analysed using in silico typing and phylogenetic reconstruction tools. Twenty-four articles out of 13 509 retrieved across 9 databases were eligible. Most studies were conducted in the World Health Organization European region (12/24, 50 %), followed by the Western Pacific region (6/24, 25 %) and the Americas region (6/24, 25 %). Serotype V (23%, 2310/10240) and clonal complex (CC) 1 (29 %, 2157/7470) were the most frequent serotype and CC, respectively. The pilus island PI1 : PI2A combination (29 %, 3931/13751) was the most prevalent surface protein gene, while the tetracycline resistance tet M (55 %, 5892/10624) was the leading antibiotic resistance gene. This study highlights that, given the common serotype distribution identified among non-pregnant populations (V, III, Ia, Ib, II and IV), vaccines including these six serotypes will provide broad coverage. The study indicates advanced molecular epidemiology studies, especially in resource-constrained settings for evidence-based decisions. Finally, the study shows that considering all at-risk populations in an inclusive approach is essential to ensure the sustainable containment of GBS.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Meeting report: Towards better risk stratification, prevention and therapy of invasive GBS disease, ESPID research meeting May 2022.
- Author
-
Snoek L, Karampatsas K, Bijlsma MW, Henneke P, Jauneikaite E, Khan UB, Zadoks RN, and Le Doare K
- Abstract
The European Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (ESPID) hosted the third Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Research Session in Athens on 11th May 2022, providing researchers and clinicians from around the world an opportunity to share and discuss recent advances in GBS pathophysiology, molecular and genetic epidemiology and how these new insights can help in improving prevention and control of early- and late-onset GBS disease. The meeting provided a state-of-the-art overview of the existing GBS prevention strategies and their limitations, and an opportunity to share the latest research findings. The first presentation provided an overview of current GBS prevention and treatment strategies. In the second presentation, the genomic and antimicrobial resistance profiles of invasive and colonizing GBS strains were presented. The third presentation explained the association of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) with the development of late-onset disease (LOD) and the interplay of host innate immunity and GBS. The fourth presentation evaluated the role of genomics in understanding horizontal GBS transmission. The fifth presentation focused on the zoonotic links for certain GBS lineages and the last presentation described the protective role of breastmilk. Talks were followed with interactive discussions and concluded with recommendations on what is needed to further GBS clinical research; these included: (i) the development of better risk stratification methods by combining GBS virulence factors, serological biomarkers and clinical risk factors; (ii) further studies on the interplay of perinatal antimicrobials, disturbances in the development of host immunity and late-onset GBS disease; (iii) routine submission of GBS isolates to reference laboratories to help in detecting potential clusters by using genomic sequencing; (iv) collaboration in animal and human GBS studies to detect and prevent the emergence of new pathogenic sequence types; and (v) harnessing the plethora of immune factors in the breastmilk to develop adjunct therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. COVID-19 disease and vaccination in pregnancy: understanding knowledge, perceptions and experiences among pregnant women and community leaders in Uganda.
- Author
-
Nalubega P, Namugumya R, Zalwango F, Ssali A, Mboizi R, Hookham L, Seeley J, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnant Women, Uganda epidemiology, Vaccination, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Vaccines
- Abstract
Background: We investigated pregnant women and community leaders' knowledge, perceptions and experiences of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination program during pregnancy in Uganda and how this changed over the course of the pandemic., Methods: We conducted 20 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and two group discussions (GDs) with pregnant women and four GDs with community leaders in Kawempe division of Kampala, Uganda. The first round of IDIs/GDs were carried out in March 2021. In July 2021, telephone IDIs were conducted with 7 pregnant women and 10 community leaders randomly selected from first-round interview participants. Themes were analysed deductively drawing codes from the topic guides., Results: In the first round, the majority of participants thought COVID-19 was not real because of misconceptions around government messaging/motivation and beliefs that Africans would not be affected. In the second round, participants recognised COVID-19 disease, because of rising case numbers and fatalities. There was increased awareness of the benefits of the vaccine. However, pregnant women remained unsure of vaccine safety and quality, citing side effects like fevers and general body weakness. Role models and coherent public health messaging and healthcare workers were key enablers of vaccine uptake., Conclusions: Targeted and sustained COVID-19 communication and engagement strategies are needed, especially for pregnant women and others in their communities, to improve vaccine confidence during outbreaks., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Comparison of diagnoses of early-onset sepsis associated with use of Sepsis Risk Calculator versus NICE CG149: a prospective, population-wide cohort study in London, UK, 2020-2021.
- Author
-
Piyasena C, Galu S, Yoshida R, Thakkar D, O'Sullivan J, Longley C, Evans K, Sweeney S, Kendall G, Ben-Sasi K, Richards J, Harris C, Jagodzinski J, Demirjian A, Lamagni T, Le Doare K, Heath PT, and Battersby C
- Subjects
- Infant, Newborn, Infant, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Prospective Studies, London epidemiology, Risk Assessment, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Neonatal Sepsis diagnosis, Neonatal Sepsis epidemiology, Neonatal Sepsis drug therapy, Sepsis diagnosis, Sepsis epidemiology, Sepsis drug therapy
- Abstract
Objective: We sought to compare the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation identified >24 hours after birth, in hospitals using the Kaiser Permanente Sepsis Risk Calculator (SRC) with hospitals using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance., Design and Setting: Prospective observational population-wide cohort study involving all 26 hospitals with neonatal units colocated with maternity services across London (10 using SRC, 16 using NICE)., Participants: All live births ≥34 weeks' gestation between September 2020 and August 2021., Outcome Measures: EOS was defined as isolation of a bacterial pathogen in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture from birth to 7 days of age . We evaluated the incidence of EOS identified by culture obtained >24 hours to 7 days after birth. We also evaluated the rate empiric antibiotics were commenced >24 hours to 7 days after birth, for a duration of ≥5 days, with negative blood or CSF cultures., Results: Of 99 683 live births, 42 952 (43%) were born in SRC hospitals and 56 731 (57%) in NICE hospitals. The overall incidence of EOS (<72 hours) was 0.64/1000 live births. The incidence of EOS identified >24 hours was 2.3/100 000 (n=1) for SRC vs 7.1/100 000 (n=4) for NICE (OR 0.5, 95% CI (0.1 to 2.7)). This corresponded to (1/20) 5% (SRC) vs (4/45) 8.9% (NICE) of EOS cases (χ=0.3, p=0.59). Empiric antibiotics were commenced >24 hours to 7 days after birth in 4.4/1000 (n=187) for SRC vs 2.9/1000 (n=158) for NICE (OR 1.5, 95% CI (1.2 to 1.9)). 3111 (7%) infants received antibiotics in the first 24 hours in SRC hospitals vs 8428 (15%) in NICE hospitals., Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the incidence of EOS identified >24 hours after birth between SRC and NICE hospitals. SRC use was associated with 50% fewer infants receiving antibiotics in the first 24 hours of life., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CB reports grants and personal awards funded by the National Institute for Health Research, personal fees from Chiesi Pharmaceuticals and AbbVie Pharmaceuticals and is deputy chair of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Prioritisation Committee for hospital-based care. PTH was a member of NICE CG149 guideline committee and deputy chair of NICE CG195 guideline committee. The other authors do not have any conflicts of interests to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Standardizing case definitions for monitoring the safety of maternal vaccines globally: GAIA definitions, a review of progress to date.
- Author
-
Davies HG, Bowman C, Watson G, Dodd C, Jones CE, Munoz FM, Heath PT, Cutland CL, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Pregnancy, Female, Humans, Vaccination, Immunization adverse effects, Family, Income, Vaccines adverse effects
- Abstract
In 2014, the Global Alignment on Immunization safety Assessment in pregnancy consortium (GAIA) was formed, with the goal of developing a harmonized, globally-concerted approach to actively monitor the safety of vaccines in pregnancy. A total of 26 standardized definitions for the classification of adverse events have been developed. The aim of this review was to identify and describe studies undertaken to assess the performance of these definitions. A literature search was undertaken to identify published studies assessing the performance of the definitions, and reference lists were snowballed. Data were abstracted by two investigators and a narrative review of the results is presented. Four studies that have evaluated 13 GAIA case definitions (50%) were identified. Five case definitions have been assessed in high-income settings only. Recommendations have been made by the investigators to improve the performance of the definitions. These include ensuring consistency across definitions, removal of the potential for ambiguity or variations in interpretation and ensuring that higher-level criteria are acceptable at lower levels of confidence. Future research should prioritize the key case definitions that have not been assessed in low- and middle-income settings, as well as the 13 that have not undergone any validation., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Considerations for post-licensure group B streptococcus vaccine effectiveness studies.
- Author
-
Skirrow H, Kajungu D, Le Doare K, Chantler T, and Kampmann B
- Subjects
- Humans, Pregnancy, Female, Vaccine Efficacy, Vaccination, Streptococcus agalactiae, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control, Streptococcal Infections prevention & control
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Strengthening the maternal and child health responses to Ebola outbreaks in Uganda.
- Author
-
Chowdhury M, Ouma J, Nakabembe E, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, Kirenga B, Bosa HK, Wayengera M, Le Doare K, and Sekikubo M
- Subjects
- Child, Humans, Uganda epidemiology, Child Health, Disease Outbreaks prevention & control, Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola epidemiology, Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola prevention & control, Ebolavirus
- Abstract
Competing Interests: We declare no competing interests.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Optimising the timing of whooping cough immunisation in mums (OpTIMUM) through investigating pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: an open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Calvert A, Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Basude S, Coleman M, Cuthbertson H, England A, Greening V, Hallis B, Johnstone E, Jones CE, Karampatsas K, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Matheson M, Peregrine E, Snape MD, Vatish M, and Heath PT
- Subjects
- Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Antibodies, Bacterial, Pertussis Vaccine, Vaccination methods, Immunoglobulin G, Whooping Cough prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is recommended in many countries to provide protection to young infants. The best timing for this vaccination is uncertain. In the UK, vaccination is recommended between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. In this trial we aimed to investigate the equivalence of three time periods for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy., Methods: In this open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial to investigate equivalence of different time windows for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to receive a pertussis-containing vaccine (Boostrix-inactivated poliovirus vaccine) in one of three gestational age groups, comprising group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), group 2 (24-27 weeks + 6 days), and group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) using a computer-generated randomisation list. The primary outcome was concentration of pertussis-specific antibodies in the infant born at term at birth. Maternal blood sampling was done before and 2 weeks after vaccination and at delivery, together with a cord sample, and an infant sample was collected at least 4 weeks after primary vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after vaccination. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03908164)., Findings: Between May 7, 2019, and Feb 13, 2020, of 1010 women assessed for eligibility, 364 women were recruited and 351 received the intervention (120 in group 1, 119 in group 2, and 112 in group 3). Equivalence of time periods was demonstrated for anti-pertussis toxin and anti-pertactin IgG concentrations. The cord blood geometric mean concentrations of anti-filamentous haemagglutinin IgG were higher with increasing gestational age at vaccination, such that for infants in group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), equivalence to group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) was not shown. Reported rates of fever were similar between study groups., Interpretation: Pertussis vaccination at three different time intervals in pregnancy resulted in equivalent concentrations of IgG antibodies in infants against two of the three pertussis antigens assessed. Overall, these findings support recommendations to vaccinate any time between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation., Funding: The Thrasher Research Fund and the National Immunisation Schedule Evaluation Consortium through the National Institute for Health and Care Research policy research programme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GA and NA report that the Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division has provided vaccine manufacturers with postmarketing surveillance reports on pneumococcal and meningococcal infection, which the companies are required to submit to the UK Licensing Authority in compliance with their Risk Management Strategy. A cost recovery charge is made for these reports. CEJ has done studies on behalf of the University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust funded by vaccine manufacturers, including Novavax, Moderna, Medicago, and Pfizer, but receives no personal funding for these activities. CEJ has served on advisory boards, data safety monitoring boards, or as a consultant for Moderna, MSD, Sanofi, Minervax, and Pfizer. MDS has acted as an investigator on behalf of the University of Oxford for studies funded or supported by vaccine manufacturers including GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, MCM vaccines, Novavax, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. MDS received no direct financial benefit for this work. From September, 2022 (after completion of this work), MDS became an employee of Medimmune and Moderna. PTH has conducted studies on behalf of St George's, University of London funded by vaccine manufacturers, including AstraZeneca, Novavax, Moderna, Valneva, Janssen, Minervax, and Pfizer, but receives no personal funding for these activities. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. 20 million pregnant women with group B streptococcus carriage: consequences, challenges, and opportunities for prevention.
- Author
-
Paul P, Gonçalves BP, Le Doare K, and Lawn JE
- Subjects
- Pregnancy, Infant, Newborn, Female, Humans, Pregnant Women, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical prevention & control, Streptococcus agalactiae, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious diagnosis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious epidemiology, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control, Premature Birth, Streptococcal Infections diagnosis, Streptococcal Infections epidemiology, Streptococcal Infections prevention & control, Streptococcal Vaccines therapeutic use
- Abstract
Purpose of Review: Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is currently the only recommended preventive approach against clinical consequences of maternal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization. In this review, we discuss new findings of total perinatal GBS burden and relative effectiveness of differing targeting of IAP, notably microbiology-based and risk factor-based screening, including potential limitations. Finally, we provide updates on maternal GBS vaccines and their potential cost-effectiveness in disease reduction., Recent Findings: Updated estimates of the burden of GBS related to pregnancy outcomes show (1) early-onset GBS disease incidence and deaths are high in some low- and middle-income countries where IAP has not been implemented and (2) late-onset GBS disease, preterm birth, and stillbirth, which are not preventable by IAP, remain a public health problem in both high and low-middle income settings. Observational evidence indicates that microbiology-based screening may be more effective than risk factor-based screening, but even in high-income countries, compliance is imperfect. To address the need for alternative prevention strategies, several maternal vaccine candidates are in clinical development, and modelling suggests these could be cost-effective in most scenarios., Summary: Recent progress in GBS vaccine research holds promise of reducing the large and preventable burden of mortality and disability caused by GBS disease, especially in higher-burden settings where clinical and laboratory services may be limited. Importantly vaccines also hold potential to prevent GBS stillbirths and GBS-associated preterm births., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Changes in preterm birth and stillbirth during COVID-19 lockdowns in 26 countries.
- Author
-
Calvert C, Brockway MM, Zoega H, Miller JE, Been JV, Amegah AK, Racine-Poon A, Oskoui SE, Abok II, Aghaeepour N, Akwaowo CD, Alshaikh BN, Ayede AI, Bacchini F, Barekatain B, Barnes R, Bebak K, Berard A, Bhutta ZA, Brook JR, Bryan LR, Cajachagua-Torres KN, Campbell-Yeo M, Chu DT, Connor KL, Cornette L, Cortés S, Daly M, Debauche C, Dedeke IOF, Einarsdóttir K, Engjom H, Estrada-Gutierrez G, Fantasia I, Fiorentino NM, Franklin M, Fraser A, Gachuno OW, Gallo LA, Gissler M, Håberg SE, Habibelahi A, Häggström J, Hookham L, Hui L, Huicho L, Hunter KJ, Huq S, Kc A, Kadambari S, Kelishadi R, Khalili N, Kippen J, Le Doare K, Llorca J, Magee LA, Magnus MC, Man KKC, Mburugu PM, Mediratta RP, Morris AD, Muhajarine N, Mulholland RH, Bonnard LN, Nakibuuka V, Nassar N, Nyadanu SD, Oakley L, Oladokun A, Olayemi OO, Olutekunbi OA, Oluwafemi RO, Ogunkunle TO, Orton C, Örtqvist AK, Ouma J, Oyapero O, Palmer KR, Pedersen LH, Pereira G, Pereyra I, Philip RK, Pruski D, Przybylski M, Quezada-Pinedo HG, Regan AK, Rhoda NR, Rihs TA, Riley T, Rocha TAH, Rolnik DL, Saner C, Schneuer FJ, Souter VL, Stephansson O, Sun S, Swift EM, Szabó M, Temmerman M, Tooke L, Urquia ML, von Dadelszen P, Wellenius GA, Whitehead C, Wong ICK, Wood R, Wróblewska-Seniuk K, Yeboah-Antwi K, Yilgwan CS, Zawiejska A, Sheikh A, Rodriguez N, Burgner D, Stock SJ, and Azad MB
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Communicable Disease Control, Pandemics prevention & control, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Premature Birth epidemiology, Stillbirth epidemiology
- Abstract
Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of infant mortality worldwide. Changes in PTB rates, ranging from -90% to +30%, were reported in many countries following early COVID-19 pandemic response measures ('lockdowns'). It is unclear whether this variation reflects real differences in lockdown impacts, or perhaps differences in stillbirth rates and/or study designs. Here we present interrupted time series and meta-analyses using harmonized data from 52 million births in 26 countries, 18 of which had representative population-based data, with overall PTB rates ranging from 6% to 12% and stillbirth ranging from 2.5 to 10.5 per 1,000 births. We show small reductions in PTB in the first (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98, P value <0.0001), second (0.96, 0.92-0.99, 0.03) and third (0.97, 0.94-1.00, 0.09) months of lockdown, but not in the fourth month of lockdown (0.99, 0.96-1.01, 0.34), although there were some between-country differences after the first month. For high-income countries in this study, we did not observe an association between lockdown and stillbirths in the second (1.00, 0.88-1.14, 0.98), third (0.99, 0.88-1.12, 0.89) and fourth (1.01, 0.87-1.18, 0.86) months of lockdown, although we have imprecise estimates due to stillbirths being a relatively rare event. We did, however, find evidence of increased risk of stillbirth in the first month of lockdown in high-income countries (1.14, 1.02-1.29, 0.02) and, in Brazil, we found evidence for an association between lockdown and stillbirth in the second (1.09, 1.03-1.15, 0.002), third (1.10, 1.03-1.17, 0.003) and fourth (1.12, 1.05-1.19, <0.001) months of lockdown. With an estimated 14.8 million PTB annually worldwide, the modest reductions observed during early pandemic lockdowns translate into large numbers of PTB averted globally and warrant further research into causal pathways., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Neonatal outcomes and indirect consequences following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Sturrock S, Ali S, Gale C, Battersby C, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Female, Humans, SARS-CoV-2, Cesarean Section, Infant Mortality, Fetal Growth Retardation, Pregnancy Outcome, COVID-19 epidemiology, Premature Birth epidemiology, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious epidemiology
- Abstract
Objectives: To identify the association between maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and individual neonatal morbidities and outcomes, particularly longer-term outcomes such as neurodevelopment., Design: Systematic review of outcomes of neonates born to pregnant women diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 infection at any stage during pregnancy, including asymptomatic women., Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, WHOLIS and LILACS databases, last searched on 28 July 2021., Eligibility Criteria: Case-control and cohort studies published after 1 January 2020, including preprint articles were included. Study outcomes included neonatal mortality and morbidity, preterm birth, caesarean delivery, small for gestational age, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, level of respiratory support required, diagnosis of culture-positive sepsis, evidence of brain injury, necrotising enterocolitis, visual or hearing impairment, neurodevelopmental outcomes and feeding method. These were selected according to a core outcome set., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted into Microsoft Excel by two researchers, with statistical analysis completed using IBM SPSS (Version 27). Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale., Results: The search returned 3234 papers, from which 204 were included with a total of 45 646 infants born to mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy across 36 countries. We found limited evidence of an increased risk of some neonatal morbidities, including respiratory disease. There was minimal evidence from low-income settings (1 study) and for neonatal outcomes following first trimester infection (17 studies). Neonatal mortality was very rare. Preterm birth, neonatal unit admission and small for gestational age status were more common in infants born following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy in most larger studies., Conclusions: There are limited data on neonatal morbidity and mortality following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly from low-income countries and following early pregnancy infections. Large, representative studies addressing these outcomes are needed to understand the consequences for babies born to women with SARS-CoV-2., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021249818., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Maternal colonization and early-onset neonatal bacterial sepsis in the Gambia, West Africa: a genomic analysis of vertical transmission.
- Author
-
Okomo UA, Darboe S, Bah SY, Ayorinde A, Jarju S, Sesay AK, Kebbeh N, Gai A, Dibbasey T, Grey-Johnson M, Le Doare K, Holt KE, Lawn JE, and Kampmann B
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Gambia, Staphylococcus aureus, Cross-Sectional Studies, Bacteria, Africa, Western, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical prevention & control, Genomics, Nucleotides, Neonatal Sepsis, Infant, Newborn, Diseases etiology, Infant, Newborn, Diseases microbiology, Sepsis epidemiology
- Abstract
Objectives: To define bacterial aetiology of neonatal sepsis and estimate the prevalence of neonatal infection from maternal genital tract bacterial carriage among mother-newborn pairs., Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study of newborns with clinical sepsis admitted to three hospitals in the Gambia neonatal wards. Neonatal blood cultures and maternal genital swabs were obtained at recruitment. We used whole-genome sequencing to explore vertical transmission for neonates with microbiologically confirmed bloodstream infection by comparing phenotypically-matched paired neonatal blood cultures and maternal genital tract bacterial isolates., Results: We enrolled 203 maternal-newborn pairs. Two-thirds (67%; 137/203) of neonates presented with early-onset sepsis (days 0-6 after birth) of which 26% (36/137) were because of a clinically-significant bacterial pathogen. Blood culture isolates from newborns with early-onset sepsis because of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5), Klebsiella pneumonia (n = 2), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 1), phenotypically matched their maternal genital tract isolates. Pairwise single-nucleotide variants comparisons showed differences of 12 to 52 single-nucleotide variants only between maternal and newborn S. aureus isolates, presumably representing vertical transmission with a transmission rate of 14% (5/36)., Conclusions: We found a low prevalence of vertical transmission of maternal genital tract colonization in maternal-newborn pairs for early-onset neonatal sepsis in the West African context. Identifying infection acquisition pathways among newborns is essential to prioritize preventive interventions, which could be targeted at the mother or infection control in the hospital environment, depending on the major pathways of transmission., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Using Dried Blood Spots for a Sero-Surveillance Study of Maternally Derived Antibody against Group B Streptococcus.
- Author
-
Auma E, Hall T, Chopra S, Bilton S, Ramkhelawon L, Amini F, Calvert A, Amirthalingam G, Jones CE, Andrews N, Heath PT, and Le Doare K
- Abstract
Vaccination during pregnancy could protect women and their infants from invasive Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease. To understand if neonatal dried blood spots (DBS) can be used to determine the amount of maternally derived antibody that protects infants against invasive GBS disease, a retrospective case-control study was conducted in England between 1 April 2014 and 30 April 2015. The DBS of cases with invasive GBS disease ( n = 61) were matched with healthy controls ( n = 125). The haematocrit, DBS storage temperature, freeze-thaw cycle, and paired serum/DBS studies were set up to optimise the antibody assessment. The samples were analysed using a multiplex immunoassay, and the results were assessed using parametric and nonparametric tests. Antibody concentrations were stable at haematocrits of up to 50% but declined at 75%. DBS storage at room temperature was stable for three months compared with storage from collection at -20 °C and rapidly degraded thereafter. Total IgG levels measured in DBS and paired serum showed a good correlation ( r
2 = 0.99). However, due to suboptimal storage conditions, no difference was found in the GBS IgG levels between DBS samples from cases and controls. We have demonstrated a proof of concept that assays utilising DBS for assessing GBS serotype-specific antibodies in infants is viable. This method could be used to facilitate future large sero-correlate studies, but DBS samples must be stored at -20 °C for long term preservation of antibody.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Clinical risk factors of adverse outcomes among women with COVID-19 in the pregnancy and postpartum period: a sequential, prospective meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Smith ER, Oakley E, Grandner GW, Rukundo G, Farooq F, Ferguson K, Baumann S, Adams Waldorf KM, Afshar Y, Ahlberg M, Ahmadzia H, Akelo V, Aldrovandi G, Bevilacqua E, Bracero N, Brandt JS, Broutet N, Carrillo J, Conry J, Cosmi E, Crispi F, Crovetto F, Del Mar Gil M, Delgado-López C, Divakar H, Driscoll AJ, Favre G, Fernandez Buhigas I, Flaherman V, Gale C, Godwin CL, Gottlieb S, Gratacós E, He S, Hernandez O, Jones S, Joshi S, Kalafat E, Khagayi S, Knight M, Kotloff KL, Lanzone A, Laurita Longo V, Le Doare K, Lees C, Litman E, Lokken EM, Madhi SA, Magee LA, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Metz TD, Miller ES, Money D, Moungmaithong S, Mullins E, Nachega JB, Nunes MC, Onyango D, Panchaud A, Poon LC, Raiten D, Regan L, Sahota D, Sakowicz A, Sanin-Blair J, Stephansson O, Temmerman M, Thorson A, Thwin SS, Tippett Barr BA, Tolosa JE, Tug N, Valencia-Prado M, Visentin S, von Dadelszen P, Whitehead C, Wood M, Yang H, Zavala R, and Tielsch JM
- Subjects
- Pregnancy, Infant, Newborn, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Thinness, SARS-CoV-2, Pregnancy Outcome epidemiology, Risk Factors, Postpartum Period, COVID-19 epidemiology, Premature Birth epidemiology, HIV Infections, Cardiovascular Diseases, Pregnancy Complications epidemiology, Hypertension
- Abstract
Objective: This sequential, prospective meta-analysis sought to identify risk factors among pregnant and postpartum women with COVID-19 for adverse outcomes related to disease severity, maternal morbidities, neonatal mortality and morbidity, and adverse birth outcomes., Data Sources: We prospectively invited study investigators to join the sequential, prospective meta-analysis via professional research networks beginning in March 2020., Study Eligibility Criteria: Eligible studies included those recruiting at least 25 consecutive cases of COVID-19 in pregnancy within a defined catchment area., Methods: We included individual patient data from 21 participating studies. Data quality was assessed, and harmonized variables for risk factors and outcomes were constructed. Duplicate cases were removed. Pooled estimates for the absolute and relative risk of adverse outcomes comparing those with and without each risk factor were generated using a 2-stage meta-analysis., Results: We collected data from 33 countries and territories, including 21,977 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy or postpartum. We found that women with comorbidities (preexisting diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease) vs those without were at higher risk for COVID-19 severity and adverse pregnancy outcomes (fetal death, preterm birth, low birthweight). Participants with COVID-19 and HIV were 1.74 times (95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.71) more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit. Pregnant women who were underweight before pregnancy were at higher risk of intensive care unit admission (relative risk, 5.53; 95% confidence interval, 2.27-13.44), ventilation (relative risk, 9.36; 95% confidence interval, 3.87-22.63), and pregnancy-related death (relative risk, 14.10; 95% confidence interval, 2.83-70.36). Prepregnancy obesity was also a risk factor for severe COVID-19 outcomes including intensive care unit admission (relative risk, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.60), ventilation (relative risk, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-3.51), any critical care (relative risk, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.77), and pneumonia (relative risk, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.33). Anemic pregnant women with COVID-19 also had increased risk of intensive care unit admission (relative risk, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.11) and death (relative risk, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.81)., Conclusion: We found that pregnant women with comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease were at increased risk for severe COVID-19-related outcomes, maternal morbidities, and adverse birth outcomes. We also identified several less commonly known risk factors, including HIV infection, prepregnancy underweight, and anemia. Although pregnant women are already considered a high-risk population, special priority for prevention and treatment should be given to pregnant women with these additional risk factors., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Simultaneous carriage of multiple serotypes of Group B Streptococcus: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Barro C, Salloum M, Lim S, Delputte P, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Humans, Serogroup, Streptococcus agalactiae, Prevalence, Carrier State epidemiology, Pneumococcal Infections prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Epidemiological studies evaluating the distribution of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) serotypes are crucial for serotype-specific vaccine development and post-licensure surveillance. However, there is a paucity of data about the prevalence of simultaneous carriage of multiple serotypes., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of three databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed) to identify studies reporting GBS serotype co-carriage at the same anatomical site (multiple serotypes in one sample) or different anatomical sites (paired samples from one individual with different serotypes). We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to evaluate the prevalence of co-carriage., Results: 18 articles met the inclusion criteria, representing at least 12,968 samples from 14 countries. In a random-effects meta-analysis, we identified that 10 % (95 % CI: 4-19) of the positive samples taken from one anatomical site have more than one serotype, and 11 % (95 % CI: 5-20) of positive participants with samples taken from two anatomical sites carried different serotypes. When reported, the number of serotypes simultaneously carried ranged from 1 to 4. The serotypes most often associated with co-carriage are III (20.3 %), V (20.3 %) and Ia (19.5 %)., Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that co-carriage is a minor but definite phenomenon, but the data are too limited to give a precise picture of the current epidemiology. Co-colonisation detection needs to be taken into consideration in the design and methods of future GBS carriage surveillance studies to estimate and evaluate the potential for serotype replacement once vaccines are introduced., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Adverse maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Smith ER, Oakley E, Grandner GW, Ferguson K, Farooq F, Afshar Y, Ahlberg M, Ahmadzia H, Akelo V, Aldrovandi G, Tippett Barr BA, Bevilacqua E, Brandt JS, Broutet N, Fernández Buhigas I, Carrillo J, Clifton R, Conry J, Cosmi E, Crispi F, Crovetto F, Delgado-López C, Divakar H, Driscoll AJ, Favre G, Flaherman VJ, Gale C, Gil MM, Gottlieb SL, Gratacós E, Hernandez O, Jones S, Kalafat E, Khagayi S, Knight M, Kotloff K, Lanzone A, Le Doare K, Lees C, Litman E, Lokken EM, Laurita Longo V, Madhi SA, Magee LA, Martinez-Portilla RJ, McClure EM, Metz TD, Miller ES, Money D, Moungmaithong S, Mullins E, Nachega JB, Nunes MC, Onyango D, Panchaud A, Poon LC, Raiten D, Regan L, Rukundo G, Sahota D, Sakowicz A, Sanin-Blair J, Söderling J, Stephansson O, Temmerman M, Thorson A, Tolosa JE, Townson J, Valencia-Prado M, Visentin S, von Dadelszen P, Adams Waldorf K, Whitehead C, Yassa M, and Tielsch JM
- Subjects
- Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, SARS-CoV-2, Pregnant Women, COVID-19
- Abstract
Introduction: Despite a growing body of research on the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, there is continued controversy given heterogeneity in the quality and design of published studies., Methods: We screened ongoing studies in our sequential, prospective meta-analysis. We pooled individual participant data to estimate the absolute and relative risk (RR) of adverse outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with confirmed negative pregnancies. We evaluated the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale., Results: We screened 137 studies and included 12 studies in 12 countries involving 13 136 pregnant women.Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection-as compared with uninfected pregnant women-were at significantly increased risk of maternal mortality (10 studies; n=1490; RR 7.68, 95% CI 1.70 to 34.61); admission to intensive care unit (8 studies; n=6660; RR 3.81, 95% CI 2.03 to 7.17); receiving mechanical ventilation (7 studies; n=4887; RR 15.23, 95% CI 4.32 to 53.71); receiving any critical care (7 studies; n=4735; RR 5.48, 95% CI 2.57 to 11.72); and being diagnosed with pneumonia (6 studies; n=4573; RR 23.46, 95% CI 3.03 to 181.39) and thromboembolic disease (8 studies; n=5146; RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 27.12).Neonates born to women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to be admitted to a neonatal care unit after birth (7 studies; n=7637; RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.08); be born preterm (7 studies; n=6233; RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.29) or moderately preterm (7 studies; n=6071; RR 2.92, 95% CI 1.88 to 4.54); and to be born low birth weight (12 studies; n=11 930; RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.40). Infection was not linked to stillbirth. Studies were generally at low or moderate risk of bias., Conclusions: This analysis indicates that SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal death, severe maternal morbidities and neonatal morbidity, but not stillbirth or intrauterine growth restriction. As more data become available, we will update these findings per the published protocol., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CW declares a relationship with Ferring Pharmaceuticals COVID-19 Investigational Grant and NHMRC Fellowship (salary support). AP declares the following research grants to her institution: ‘H2020-Grant—Consortium member of Innovative medicine initiative call 13 topic 9 «ConcePTION», Efficacy and safety studies on Medicines EMA/2017/09/PE/11, Lot 4, WP 2 lead, Safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines in the EU—Reopening of competition no. 20 under a framework contract following procurement procedure EMA/2017/09/PE (Lot 3) (Euro 110,000), Federal Office of Public Health (207,000 CHF)’. EM declares a relationship with the National Institute for Health Research (project grant for PAN COVID study). DM declares a relationship with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (payments to institution only), Public Health Agency of Canada (payments to institution only), BC Women’s Foundation (payments to institution only) and is a member of the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force sponsored by the Canadian government. TDM declares a relationship with Pfizer (site principal investigator for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, money paid to institution and member of Medical Advisory Board for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, money paid to TDM), NICHD (subcommittee chair for the NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Gestational Research Assessments of COVID-19 (GRAVID) study) and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (board member). EL declares a relationship with the US NIH (paid institution) and is an employee of AbbVie, but was employed at the University of Washington at the time of the study. KK declares a relationship with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. VJF declares a relationship with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (payments to institution), Yellow Chair Foundation (payments to institution), Robert Woods Johnson Foundation (payments to institution), CDC Foundation, California Health Care Foundation (payments to institution), Tara Health Foundation (payments to institution), UCSF Women’s Health Center of Excellence (payments to institution) and California Department of Health Care Services (payments made to institution). JS-B declares a relationship with the Ferring Pharmaceuticals, which gave a grant ($10 000) for the expenses of RECOGEST trial and is a part of the Columbian Federation of Perinatology. YA declares a relationship with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (payments made to institution), CDC Foundation (payments made to institution), Robert Woods Johnson Foundation (payments made to institution) and UCLA Dean’s Office COVID-19 research (payments made to institution). RC declares a relationship with the NIH HD36801 (MFMU Network DCC). MCN declares a relationship with the BMGF (project grant made to institution), EDCTP, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Pfizer (research grants made to institution), Sanofi Pasteur (payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events) and Sanofi Pasteur and Pfizer (payment for expert testimony). ESM declares a relationship with Pfizer (site principal investigator for phase 2/3 RCT of COVID vaccine during pregnancy). OS declares a relationship with the NordForsk Funding (Nordic research funding grant number: 105545), the Swedish Medical Products Agency (funding for reports on COVID-19 vaccines and pregnancy) and Karolinska Institutet (funding for COVID research and pregnancy: 2020-01567). EG declares a relationship with the Stavros Niarchos Foundation, Santander Foundation and ‘La Caixa’ Foundation (payments made to institution). SAM declares a relationship with BMGF (funded study in South Africa)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Vaccinating Children against SARS-CoV-2: A Literature Review and Survey of International Experts to Assess Safety, Efficacy and Perceptions of Vaccine Use in Children.
- Author
-
Hookham L, Lee HC, Patel DA, Coelho M, Giglio N, Le Doare K, and Pannaraj PS
- Abstract
Introduction: The balance of risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in children is more complex than in adults with limited paediatric data resulting in no global consensus on whether all healthy children should be vaccinated. We sought to assess the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of childhood vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, as well as better understanding perceptions of vaccination in parents and vaccine experts. Methods: We performed a literature review for COVID-19 vaccine safety, efficacy, effectiveness, and perceptions. We searched international safety databases for safety data and developed an electronic survey to elicit country-specific COVID-19 immunisation data, including vaccine regulations, policies, rates, and public attitudes solicited from vaccine experts. Results: Nine studies were included in the final safety analysis. Local reactions were frequently reported across all studies and vaccine types. Adverse events reported to surveillance systems tended to be non-serious, and commonly included injection site reactions and dizziness. Twenty-three studies reported immunogenicity, efficacy, and effectiveness data. There were nine randomised control trials of six different vaccine types, which showed seroconversion of neutralising antibodies in vaccinated children ranging from 88% to 100%. The vaccine efficacy for Pfizer and Moderna vaccines ranged from 88% to 100%. There were 118 survey responses representing 55 different countries. Reported vaccination rates ranged from <1% to 98%. Most respondents described “mixed opinions” regarding paediatric vaccination policies in their country. By region, a more positive public attitude towards vaccination correlated with higher vaccination rates. Discussion: In this mixed-methods review, we have found evidence that vaccination against COVID-19 in children is safe, efficacious, and effective. Overall, the combined evidence from both the literature review and survey highlights the need for further data on both the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccinations in children.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Gastrointestinal, vaginal, nasopharyngeal, and breast milk microbiota profiles and breast milk metabolomic changes in Gambian infants over the first two months of lactation: A prospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Karampatsas K, Faal A, Jaiteh M, Garcia-Perez I, Aller S, Shaw AG, Kopytek A, Witney AA, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Female, Breast Feeding, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S analysis, Prospective Studies, Gambia, Lactation, Bacteria, Milk, Human chemistry, Microbiota
- Abstract
Microbiota composition in breast milk affects intestinal and respiratory microbiota colonization and the mucosal immune system's development in infants. The metabolomic content of breast milk is thought to interact with the microbiota and may influence developing infant immunity. One hundred seven Gambian mothers and their healthy, vaginally delivered, exclusively breastfed infants were included in our study. We analyzed 32 breast milk samples, 51 maternal rectovaginal swabs and 30 infants' rectal swabs at birth. We also analyzed 9 breast milk samples and 18 infants' nasopharyngeal swabs 60 days post-delivery. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine the microbiota composition. Metabolomic profiling analysis was performed on colostrum and mature breast milk samples using a multiplatform approach combining 1-H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Bacterial communities were distinct in composition and diversity across different sample types. Breast milk composition changed over the first 60 days of lactation. α-1,4- and α-1,3-fucosylated human milk oligosaccharides, and other 33 key metabolites in breast milk (monosaccharides, sugar alcohols and fatty acids) increased between birth and day 60 of life. This study's results indicate that infant gut and respiratory microbiota are unique bacterial communities, distinct from maternal gut and breast milk, respectively. Breast milk microbiota composition and metabolomic profile change throughout lactation. These changes may contribute to the infant's immunological, metabolic, and neurological development and could consist the basis for future interventions to correct disrupted early life microbial colonization., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Evaluation of immunogenicity and reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women.
- Author
-
Blakeway H, Amin-Chowdhury Z, Prasad S, Kalafat E, Ismail M, Abdallah FN, Rezvani A, Amirthalingam G, Brown K, Le Doare K, Heath PT, Ladhani SN, and Khalil A
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Pregnancy, COVID-19 Vaccines, SARS-CoV-2, Cohort Studies, Longitudinal Studies, RNA, Messenger, mRNA Vaccines, COVID-19, Vaccines
- Abstract
Objective: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Vaccines are highly effective at preventing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but there are limited data on COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women when administered according to the 12-week-interval dosing schedule recommended in the UK., Methods: This was a cohort study of pregnant women receiving COVID-19 vaccination between April and September 2021. The outcomes were immunogenicity and reactogenicity after COVID-19 vaccination. Pregnant women were recruited by phone, e-mail and/or text and were vaccinated according to vaccine availability at their local vaccination center. For immunogenicity assessment, blood samples were taken at specific timepoints after each dose to evaluate nucleocapsid protein (N) and spike protein (S) antibody titers. The comparator group comprised non-pregnant female healthcare workers in the same age group who were vaccinated as part of the national immunization program in a contemporaneous longitudinal cohort study. Longitudinal changes in serum antibody titers and association with pregnancy status were assessed using a two-step regression approach. Reactogenicity assessment in pregnant women was undertaken using an online questionnaire. The comparator group comprised non-pregnant women aged 18-49 years who had received two vaccine doses in primary care. The association of pregnancy status with reactogenicity was assessed using logistic regression analysis., Results: Overall, 67 pregnant women, of whom 66 had received a mRNA vaccine, and 79 non-pregnant women, of whom 50 had received a mRNA vaccine, were included in the immunogenicity study. Most (61.2%) pregnant women received their first vaccine dose in the third trimester, while 3.0% received it in the first trimester and 35.8% in the second trimester. SARS-CoV-2 S-antibody geometric mean concentrations after mRNA vaccination were not significantly different at 2-6 weeks after the first dose but were significantly lower at 2-6 weeks after the second dose in infection-naïve pregnant compared with non-pregnant women. In pregnant women, prior infection was associated with higher antibody levels at 2-6 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Reactogenicity analysis included 108 pregnant women and 116 non-pregnant women. After the first dose, tiredness and chills were reported less commonly in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women (P = 0.043 and P = 0.029, respectively). After the second dose, feeling generally unwell was reported less commonly (P = 0.046) in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women., Conclusions: Using an extended 12-week interval between vaccine doses, antibody responses after two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were found to be lower in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women. Strong antibody responses were achieved after one dose in previously infected women, regardless of pregnancy status. Pregnant women reported fewer adverse events after both the first and second dose of vaccine. These findings should now be addressed in larger controlled studies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Clinical Risk Factors Associated With Late-Onset Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
- Author
-
Karampatsas K, Davies H, Mynarek M, Andrews N, Heath PT, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Adult, Antibiotic Prophylaxis adverse effects, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical prevention & control, Male, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Streptococcus agalactiae, Young Adult, Infant, Newborn, Diseases etiology, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious drug therapy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious epidemiology, Streptococcal Infections prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Group B streptococcal (GBS) infection remains one of the most significant causes of late-onset sepsis and meningitis (LOGBS) among young infants. However, transmission routes and risk factors for LOGBS are not yet fully understood., Methods: We conducted systematic reviews on clinical risk factors previously reported in the literature (prematurity, low birth weight [<2500 g], antenatal colonization, multiple-gestation pregnancy, maternal age <20 years, male infant sex, intrapartum fever, prolonged rupture of membranes) and meta-analyses to determine pooled estimates of risk., Results: We included 27 articles, reporting 5315 cases. Prematurity (odds ratio [OR] 5.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.43-7.22), low birth weight (OR 6.73; 95% CI: 4.68-9.67), maternal colonization (2.67; [2.07-3.45]), and multiple-gestation pregnancies (OR 8.01; 95% CI: 5.19-12.38) were associated with an increased risk of LOGBS., Conclusions: Prematurity/low birth weight and maternal colonization are major risk factors for LOGBS. Future GBS vaccine studies should try to establish the optimal time for vaccination during pregnancy to protect preterm infants., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. K. L. D. is supported by Future Leaders Fellowships by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/S016570/1). P. T. H. reports research grants to the institution from Pfizer and Minervax outside of the submitted work. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Comparison of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children With Group B Streptococcal Sepsis and Meningitis.
- Author
-
Davies HG, O'Sullivan CP, Al Janabi H, Rattue H, Trotter C, Giorgakoudi K, Ramsay M, Ladhani S, Lamagni T, Okike IO, Le Doare K, and Heath PT
- Subjects
- Child, Humans, Streptococcus agalactiae, Meningitis, Meningitis, Bacterial drug therapy, Sepsis, Streptococcal Infections complications, Streptococcal Infections drug therapy
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. P. T. H. reports research grants to institution for group B streptococcal vaccine study unrelated to this work from Pfizer and Minervax. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization is dynamic over time, whilst GBS capsular polysaccharides-specific antibody remains stable.
- Author
-
Haeusler IL, Daniel O, Isitt C, Watts R, Cantrell L, Feng S, Cochet M, Salloum M, Ikram S, Hayter E, Lim S, Hall T, Athaide S, Cosgrove CA, Tregoning JS, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Adult, Antibodies, Bacterial, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Polysaccharides, Pregnancy, Streptococcus agalactiae, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Streptococcal Infections diagnosis
- Abstract
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to invasive infection. This study investigated longitudinal variation in GBS rectovaginal colonization, serum and vaginal GBS capsular polysaccharide (CPS)-specific antibody levels. Non-pregnant women were recruited in the UK and were sampled every 2 weeks over a 12-week period. GBS isolates were taken from recto-vaginal swabs and serotyped by polymerase chain reaction. Serum and vaginal immunoglobulin G (IgG) and nasal immunoglobulin A (IgA) specific to CPS were measured by Luminex, and total IgG/A by ELISA. Seventy women were enrolled, of median age 26. Out of the 66 participants who completed at least three visits: 14/47 (29.8%) women that were GBS negative at screening became positive in follow-up visits and 16/19 (84.2%) women who were GBS positive at screening became negative. There was 50% probability of becoming negative 36 days after the first positive swab. The rate of detectable GBS carriage fluctuated over time, although serum, vaginal, and nasal CPS-specific antibody levels remained constant. Levels of CPS-specific antibodies were higher in the serum of individuals colonized with GBS than in non-colonized, but similar in the vaginal and nasal mucosa. We found correlations between antibody levels in serum and the vaginal and nasal mucosa. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of elution methods to retrieve vaginal and nasal antibodies, and the optimization of immunoassays to measure GBS-CPS-specific antibodies. The difference between the dynamics of colonization and antibody response is interesting and further investigation is required for vaccine development., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Protocol for a sequential, prospective meta-analysis to describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pregnancy and postpartum periods.
- Author
-
Smith ER, Oakley E, He S, Zavala R, Ferguson K, Miller L, Grandner GW, Abejirinde IO, Afshar Y, Ahmadzia H, Aldrovandi G, Akelo V, Tippett Barr BA, Bevilacqua E, Brandt JS, Broutet N, Fernández Buhigas I, Carrillo J, Clifton R, Conry J, Cosmi E, Delgado-López C, Divakar H, Driscoll AJ, Favre G, Flaherman V, Gale C, Gil MM, Godwin C, Gottlieb S, Hernandez Bellolio O, Kara E, Khagayi S, Kim CR, Knight M, Kotloff K, Lanzone A, Le Doare K, Lees C, Litman E, Lokken EM, Laurita Longo V, Magee LA, Martinez-Portilla RJ, McClure E, Metz TD, Money D, Mullins E, Nachega JB, Panchaud A, Playle R, Poon LC, Raiten D, Regan L, Rukundo G, Sanin-Blair J, Temmerman M, Thorson A, Thwin S, Tolosa JE, Townson J, Valencia-Prado M, Visentin S, von Dadelszen P, Adams Waldorf K, Whitehead C, Yang H, Thorlund K, and Tielsch JM
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Postpartum Period, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 epidemiology
- Abstract
We urgently need answers to basic epidemiological questions regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant and postpartum women and its effect on their newborns. While many national registries, health facilities, and research groups are collecting relevant data, we need a collaborative and methodologically rigorous approach to better combine these data and address knowledge gaps, especially those related to rare outcomes. We propose that using a sequential, prospective meta-analysis (PMA) is the best approach to generate data for policy- and practice-oriented guidelines. As the pandemic evolves, additional studies identified retrospectively by the steering committee or through living systematic reviews will be invited to participate in this PMA. Investigators can contribute to the PMA by either submitting individual patient data or running standardized code to generate aggregate data estimates. For the primary analysis, we will pool data using two-stage meta-analysis methods. The meta-analyses will be updated as additional data accrue in each contributing study and as additional studies meet study-specific time or data accrual thresholds for sharing. At the time of publication, investigators of 25 studies, including more than 76,000 pregnancies, in 41 countries had agreed to share data for this analysis. Among the included studies, 12 have a contemporaneous comparison group of pregnancies without COVID-19, and four studies include a comparison group of non-pregnant women of reproductive age with COVID-19. Protocols and updates will be maintained publicly. Results will be shared with key stakeholders, including the World Health Organization (WHO) Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health (MNCAH) Research Working Group. Data contributors will share results with local stakeholders. Scientific publications will be published in open-access journals on an ongoing basis., Competing Interests: Clare Whitehead declares a a relationship with the following entities, Ferring Pharmaceuticals COVID19 Investigational, Grant, NHMRC Fellowship (salary support). Edward Mullins declares a relationship with the following entities National Institute for Health Research (Project grant for PAN COVID study). Deborah Money declares a relationship with the following entities, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (payments to my institution only), Public Health Agency of Canada (payments to institution only), BC Women’s Foundation (payments to institution only) and is a Member of the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force sponsored by the Canadian government. Torri D. Metz declares a relationship with the following entities, Pfizer (site Principal Investigator for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, money paid to institution and member of Medical Advisory Board for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, money paid to me), NICHD (subcommittee Chair for the NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Gestational Research Assessments of COVID-19 (GRAVID) study), and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (board member). Erica Lokken declares a relationship with the following entity, US NIH (paid institution). Karen L. Kotloff declares a relationship with the following entity, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Siran He declares a relationship with the following entity, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundtion (payments made to institution). Valerie Flaherman declares a relationship with the following entities, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (payments to institution), Yellow Chair Foundation (payments to institution), Robert Woods Johnson Foundation (payments to institution), CDC Foundation, California Health Care Foundation (payments to institution), Tara Health Foundation (payments to institution), UCSF Women’s Health Center of Excellence (payments to institution) and California Department of Health Care Services (payments made to institution). Jose Sanin-Blair declares a relationship with the following entity, Ferring Pharmaceuticals which gave a grant ($10,000) for the expenses of RECOGEST trial and is a part of the Columbian Federation of Perinatology. Yalda Afshar declares a relationship with the following entities, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (payments made to institution), CDC Foundation (payments made to my institution), Robert Woods Johnson Foundation (payments made to institution), and UCLA Dean’s Office COVID-19 research (payments made to institution). Rebecca Clifton declares a relationship with the following entity, NIH HD36801 (MFMU Network DCC). Alice Panchaud declared a relationship with the European Medicines Agency (research grant to institution) and the Federal Office of Public Health Switzerland (research grant to institution).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy.
- Author
-
Prasad S, Kalafat E, Blakeway H, Townsend R, O'Brien P, Morris E, Draycott T, Thangaratinam S, Le Doare K, Ladhani S, von Dadelszen P, Magee LA, Heath P, and Khalil A
- Subjects
- COVID-19 Vaccines adverse effects, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Placenta, Pregnancy, RNA, Messenger, SARS-CoV-2, Stillbirth epidemiology, Vaccination, COVID-19 prevention & control, Premature Birth epidemiology
- Abstract
Safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy is a particular concern affecting vaccination uptake by this vulnerable group. Here we evaluated evidence from 23 studies including 117,552 COVID-19 vaccinated pregnant people, almost exclusively with mRNA vaccines. We show that the effectiveness of mRNA vaccination against RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection 7 days after second dose was 89·5% (95% CI 69·0-96·4%, 18,828 vaccinated pregnant people, I
2 = 73·9%). The risk of stillbirth was significantly lower in the vaccinated cohort by 15% (pooled OR 0·85; 95% CI 0·73-0·99, 66,067 vaccinated vs. 424,624 unvaccinated, I2 = 93·9%). There was no evidence of a higher risk of adverse outcomes including miscarriage, earlier gestation at birth, placental abruption, pulmonary embolism, postpartum haemorrhage, maternal death, intensive care unit admission, lower birthweight Z-score, or neonatal intensive care unit admission (p > 0.05 for all). COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in pregnancy appears to be safe and is associated with a reduction in stillbirth., (© 2022. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Maternal vaccination: a review of current evidence and recommendations.
- Author
-
Etti M, Calvert A, Galiza E, Lim S, Khalil A, Le Doare K, and Heath PT
- Subjects
- COVID-19 Vaccines, Female, Humans, Infant, Pregnancy, Pregnant Women, Vaccination, COVID-19 prevention & control, Influenza Vaccines
- Abstract
Maternal vaccination is an effective means of protecting pregnant women, their fetuses, and infants from vaccine-preventable infections. Despite the availability of sufficient safety data to support the use of vaccines during pregnancy, maternal immunization remains an underutilized method of disease prevention, often because of concerns from both healthcare providers and pregnant women about vaccine safety. Such concerns have been reflected in the low uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant women seen in many parts of the world. Here, we present an update of the current recommendations for the use of vaccines during pregnancy, including the evidence supporting the use of novel vaccine platforms. We also provide an overview of the data supporting the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy and an update of the status of vaccines that are currently under development for use in pregnant women., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Epidemiology of group B streptococcal disease in infants younger than 1 year in Japan: a nationwide surveillance study 2016-2020.
- Author
-
Shibata M, Matsubara K, Matsunami K, Miyairi I, Kasai M, Kai M, Katayama Y, Maruyama T, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Humans, Infant, Japan epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Serogroup, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcal Infections drug therapy
- Abstract
We aimed to define the burden and clinical features of invasive group B streptococcus (GBS) disease in infants younger than 1 year in Japan, to explore transmission route of late-onset disease (LOD), and to identify risk factors associated with recurrent GBS disease. We conducted a retrospective, questionnaire-based nationwide surveillance study between 2016 and 2020. A total of 875 GBS cases were identified, including 186 early-onset disease, 628 LOD, and 61 ultra-late-onset disease. Case fatality rate in each age category was 6.5%, 3.0%, and 3.3%, respectively. Patients with meningitis had neurodevelopmental sequelae in 21.5% (64/297). Annual incidence in infants younger than 1 year and in LOD significantly increased from 0.28 to 0.45/1000 livebirths (p = 0.021) and from 0.19 to 0.29/1000 livebirths (p = 0.046), respectively. Maternal colonization status at the LOD diagnosis was available for 148 mothers, of whom 21/58 (36.2%) had positive rectovaginal swabs and 42/117 (36.2%) had GBS in breastmilk culture. These two sites are potentially infectious routes in LOD. The four leading disease-causing serotypes III, Ia, Ib, and V represented 95% of the available serotypes. Thirty-one recurrent cases were identified, accounting for 3.7% of total patients. A multivariate regression analysis showed that prematurity (p = 0.029) and antepartum maternal GBS colonization (p = 0.032) were significantly associated with risk for the recurrence. Our findings indicated that GBS disease burden still remains with considerable mortality and morbidity in Japan, and provided important information for developing better strategies for the prevention of GBS disease, including maternal vaccination., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.