Search

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma has emerged as a significant prognostic factor, guiding treatment strategies and enhancing patient outcomes. Despite advancements in therapies such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, CAR-T cell therapy, and bispecific antibodies, complete eradication of malignant plasma cells remains challenging. MRD refers to a small number of residual cancer cells that persist after treatment and require sensitive methods like next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detection. MRD negativity has been associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), making it a key marker in clinical trials. The clinical utility of MRD lies in its ability to predict outcomes, with sustained MRD negativity linked to prolonged survival. Furthermore, it will likely help in tailoring treatment approaches, such as therapy escalation for high-risk patients or de-escalation for those achieving MRD negativity. Despite its prognostic value, challenges remain in standardizing MRD testing, ensuring its widespread availability, and addressing variability in results based on different detection methods. Future research aims to refine MRD-guided treatment and explore novel detection techniques, such as liquid biopsies, to improve patient monitoring in multiple myeloma., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Fees: Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, Takeda, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is challenging as patients exhaust all available therapies and the disease becomes refractory to standard drug classes. Here we report the final results of LocoMMotion, the first prospective study of real-world clinical practice (RWCP) in triple-class exposed (TCE) patients with RRMM, with a median follow-up of 26.4 months (range, 0.1-35.0). Patients (N  =  248) had received median 4 prior LOT (range, 2-13) at enrollment. 91 unique regimens were used in index LOT. Overall response rate was 31.9% (95% CI, 26.1-38.0), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-5.6) and median overall survival was 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.8-17.0). 152 patients (61.3%) had subsequent LOTs with 134 unique regimens, of which 78 were used in first subsequent LOT. Median PFS2 (from start of study through first subsequent LOT) was 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.4-13.0). 158 patients died on study, 67.7% due to progressive disease. Additional subgroup analyses and long-term safety summaries are reported. The high number of RWCP treatment regimens utilized and poor clinical outcomes confirm a lack of standardized treatment for TCE patients with RRMM, highlighting the need for new treatments with novel mechanisms., Competing Interests: Competing interests: M-VM has received honoraria from or served on the board of directors/advisory committees for AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Seagen, and Takeda. KW has served as a consultant and received honoraria from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Karyopharm, and Takeda; has received honoraria from Roche; and has received honoraria and served as a member on boards of directors and/or advisory committees for Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi. VDS has served on an advisory board or speakers’ bureaus and received honoraria from AbbVie, Alexion, AOP Health, argenx, BMS, GSK, Grifols, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, SOBI, and Takeda. HG has served as a consultant for Amgen, Novartis, and Takeda; has served as a consultant and received honoraria, grants, and/or provision of investigational medicinal product and research funding from Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, and Sanofi; has received research funding from Incyte, Molecular Partners, MSD, Mundipharma, and Novartis; and has received other grants from Dietmer Hopp Foundation. MD has received honoraria from Amgen, BMS, GSK, and Janssen; and has served on the speakers’ bureau for Janssen. MM has received honoraria from Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; and has received honoraria/research funding from Celgene and Sanofi. JL-H has no relationships to disclose. DD is an employee/consultant/honoraria/member of board of directors/advisory committees for Janssen Cilag; and a member of the board of directors/advisory committees/received research funding from Celgene. EA has no relationships to disclose. LV has served on the advisory board of BMS, Janssen, and Takeda. AP has received honoraria from or has served in a consulting/advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. RB has received honoraria/research funding from Allogene, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, and Servier. NWCJvdD has received research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Cellectis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; and has served in a consulting/advisory role for Adaptive, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Takeda. EMO has received honoraria from or has served in a consulting/advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Menarini, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. TR is a former Janssen employee. JMS is a Janssen employee. SK is a Janssen employee. IH is a Janssen employee. VS is a Janssen employee. LM is a Janssen employee. JB is a Janssen employee. OCF is an employee of Legend Biotech USA Inc. HE has received research funding or honoraria and has served in a consulting/advisory role for Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, and Sanofi. PM has received honoraria and/or served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Induction chemotherapy followed by autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation and post-transplant therapy (including maintenance therapy with or without prior consolidation) is still considered as the standard of care for newly diagnosed young and fit multiple myeloma patients. Over the last years, superiority of quadruplet regimens for induction was established, with the addition of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to triplet regimen including a proteasome inhibitor, an IMiD (thalidomide or lenalidomide) or cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. Given quadruplet induction regimens are associated with deep response, including a high-rate of sustained measurable residual disease negativity in a significant proportion of patients, they are now recommended for induction chemotherapy when available., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The best donor option for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients lacking an HLA-matched donor has remained intensively debated. We herein report the results of a large retrospective registry study comparing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes between double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation (dCBT, n = 209) versus 9/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (UD) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (UD 9/10, n = 270) in patients with AML in first complete remission (CR1). Inclusion criteria consisted of adult patient, AML in CR1 at transplantation, either peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from UD 9/10 with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis or dCBT without PTCy, transplantation between 2013 and 2021, and no in vivo T-cell depletion. The 180-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 29% in UD 9/10 versus 44% in dCBT recipients (p = .001). After adjustment for covariates, dCBT recipients had a higher non-relapse mortality (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.48; p = .01), comparable relapse incidence (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.67-1.86; p = .66), lower leukemia-free survival (HR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.01-2.23; p = .047), and lower overall survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.08-2.55; p = .02) compared with patients receiving UD 9/10 HCT. In summary, our results suggest that transplantation outcomes are better with UD 9/10 with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis than with dCBT for AML patients in CR1. These data might support the use of UD 9/10 with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis over dCBT in AML patients lacking an HLA-matched donor., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Not available.

REACH2 and REACH3 were randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 3 studies comparing the selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib versus investigators' choice of best available therapy (BAT) in steroid-refractory (SR) acute (REACH2) or chronic (REACH3) graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD/cGVHD). Moderate-severe aGVHD/cGVHD can progress rapidly; thus, key clinical considerations driving management of patients with SR-aGVHD/SR-cGVHD are prompt treatment initiation and concomitant cytopenias. These post hoc analyses of REACH2/REACH3 describe the impact of timing of treatment initiation after SR-aGVHD/SR-cGVHD diagnosis and development of concomitant cytopenias on treatment outcomes. Ruxolitinib initiation within 3 days from SR-aGVHD diagnosis yielded an extended duration of response and higher Day 28 complete response rates compared with initiation ≥7 days after SR-aGVHD diagnosis (median 178 vs 167 days and 36.6% vs 25.0%, respectively). For patients with SR-cGVHD, Week 24 overall response was not impacted by time to treatment (54.5% vs 42.6% for <14 vs >28 days). Clinically relevant cytopenias were manageable, allowing for maintenance of dose intensity (median 20 mg/d), and did not impact the favorable efficacy outcomes from ruxolitinib treatment. This analysis highlights the practical importance of considering earlier ruxolitinib initiation after SR diagnosis in GVHD and the benefits of ruxolitinib treatment compared with BAT even for patients with cytopenias., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The t(11;14) translocation is among the most prevalent cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM), distinguished by its unique features and biology that have been thoroughly explored for decades. What further sets this MM subtype apart is its oscillating prognostic significance, from initially being considered a favorable alteration to intermediate risk and potential future reclassification as favorable risk. Despite not being inherently a high-risk alteration indicative of an aggressive phenotype, it appears that t(11;14)-MM is less responsive to novel agents like proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs which have otherwise transformed the disease's treatment landscape, perhaps partially explained by its reduced propensity for immunoglobulin production and oligosecretory nature. However, its distinct reliance on Bcl-2 has heightened its sensitivity to venetoclax. Further subclassification based on morphological and genomic characteristics could enhance our prediction models of treatment responses and enable more tailored therapeutic strategies for patients. This review aims to encapsulate the existing research evidence in this area., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The past two decades have witnessed an impressive expansion in the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma, leading to significant improvements in progression-free; as well as overall survival. However, almost all patients still experience multiple relapses during their disease course, with biological and cytogenetic heterogeneity affecting response to subsequent treatments. The purpose of this review is to provide a historical background regarding the role of alkylating agents and an updated data regarding the use of peptide-drug conjugates such as melflufen for patients with multiple myeloma., Recent Findings: The combination of daratumumab-melflufen-dexamethasone evaluated in the LIGHTHOUSE study showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to single-agent daratumumab (not reached vs. 4.9 months respectively; P  = 0.0032), with improvement in overall response rate to 59% vs. 30% respectively; P  = 0.03., Summary: There have been an interest in developing and utilizing peptide-drug conjugates such as melflufen for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, especially in the relapsed setting given historical results with alkylating agents, the use of which has been limited by dose-related toxicities in a disease that remains largely incurable. Single agent melflufen initially showed promising results especially in specific subgroups of heavily pretreated patients before the decision to suspend all clinical trials evaluating this agent after results from the OCEAN phase 3 trial. Subsequent reported analyses especially for melflufen-based combinations appear promising and suggest a potential use of peptide-drug conjugates provided optimal patient selection, as well as identification of the best companion agent., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

We compared transplantation (HSCT) outcomes in AML patients undergoing HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in first complete remission from 1065 young (<35 years) haploidentical (Haplo) donors (yHaplo) vs. 147 old (≥35 years) mismatched unrelated donors (oMMUD) (first comparison) and from 271 young (<35 years) MMUD (yMMUD) vs. 1315 old (≥35 years) Haplo donors (oHaplo) (second comparison). Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) grades II-IV were significantly lower in the yHaplo vs. oMMUD group (HR = 0.62, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in chronic GVHD, non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence, leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival. As for the second comparison, more patients in the oHaplo group had de novo AML, 86.6% vs. 81.9% in the yMMUD group (p = 0.044), while myeloablative conditioning was used more frequently in the yMMUD group, 53.3% vs. 46.8% in the oHaplo group (p = 0.049). aGVHD grades II-IV and NRM were significantly lower in the yMMUD vs. oHaplo group (HR = 0.69, p = 0.013 and HR = 0.60, p = 0.022). All other transplant outcomes did not differ. In conclusion, HSCT from young alternative donors (<35 years) results in a lower incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD. In addition, NRM is lower in HSCT from yMMUD compared to HSCT from oHaplo., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

We assessed outcomes of allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) in favorable risk AML in CR1 over 3 time periods. 1850 patients were included, 2005 to 2009- 222, 2010 to 2014 -392, and 2015 to 2021-1236; 526 with t (8:21), 625 with inv (16), and 699 with NPM1 mut FLT3 WT . Patients transplanted in 2015-2021 were older (p < 0.0001) with more patients ≥60 years of age (p < 0.0001). The most frequent diagnosis in 2015-2021 was NPM1 mut FLT3 WT vs. t (8:21) in the 2 earlier periods, (p < 0001). Haploidentical transplants (Haplo) increased from 5.9% to 14.5% (p < 0.0001). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was more frequent in 2015-2021 vs. the other 2 periods (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, incidence of total chronic GVHD was reduced in HSCTs performed ≥2015 vs. those performed in 2005-2009, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.99, p = 0.046) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) improved for patients transplanted from 2010-2014 vs. those transplanted in 2005-2009, HR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.98, p = 0.037). Other HSCT outcomes did not differ with no improvement ≥2015. LFS, OS, and GRFS were inferior in patients with t (8:21) with HR = 1.32 (95% CI 1.03-1.68, p = 0.026), HR = 1.38 (95% CI 1.04-1.83, p = 0.027) and HR = 01.25 (95% CI 1.02-1.53, p = 0.035), respectively. In conclusion, this retrospective analysis of HSCT in patients with favorable risk AML, transplanted over 16 years showed an increased number of transplants in patients ≥60 years, from Haplo donors with PTCy. Most importantly, 3-year GRFS improved ≥2010 and total chronic GVHD reduced ≥2015, with no significant change in other HSCT outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) mutations have uncertain prognostic implications in AML. We investigate the impact IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first complete remission (CR1). In total, 1515 adult patients were included, 15.91% (n = 241) carried IDH1 mutation (mIDH1), and 26.27% (n = 398) IDH2 mutation (mIDH2) and 57.82% (n = 876) had no-IDH mutation. NPM1 was frequently encountered with IDH1 mutation (no-IDH group, n = 217, 24.8%, mIDH1, n = 103, 42.7%, mIDH2, n = 111, 27.9%, p < 0.0001). At day 180, the cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower in mIDH1 and mIDH2 compared to no-IDH groups (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66 (95% CI 0.47-0.91), p = 0.011; HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.56-0.96), p = 0.025, respectively). In the mIDH1 group, overall survival (OS) was improved compared to no-IDH (HR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.48-0.94), p = 0.021), whereas mIDH2 was associated with lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.7), p < 0.001), improved leukemia free survival (LFS) (HR = 0.7 (95% CI 0.55-0.9), p = 0.004) and OS (HR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.97), p = 0.027). In the subgroup of NPM1 wild type, only IDH2 was associated with improved outcomes. In conclusion, our data suggest that IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are associated with improved outcomes in patients with AML undergoing allo-HCT in CR1., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

The association of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) is well-established but was not confirmed in the modern era and following post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We assessed GVHD/ GVL association in AML patients following HLA-matched SCT with standard calcineurin-based (n = 12,653, 57% with additional in-vivo T-cell depletion) or PTCy-based (n = 508) GVHD prophylaxis. Following standard prophylaxis, acute GVHD grade II-IV and III-IV, chronic GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD rates were 23.8%, 7.5%, 37.0%, and 16.3%, respectively. Acute GVHD grade II and III-IV were associated with lower relapse [hazard-ratio (HR) 0.85, P = 0.002; HR 0.76, P = 0.003, respectively)], higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 1.5, P < 0.001; HR 6.21, P < 0.001) and lower overall survival (OS) (HR 1.49, P < 0.001; HR 6.1, P < 0.001). Extensive chronic GVHD predicted lower relapse (HR 0.69, P < 0.001), higher NRM (HR 2.83, P < 0.001), and lower OS (HR 2.74, P < 0.001). Following PTCy, GVHD rates were 22.8%, 6.2%, 35.5%, and 17.7%, respectively. Acute GVHD was not associated with relapse (HR 1.37, P = 0.15) but predicted higher NRM (HR 3.34, P < 0.001) and lower OS (HR 1.92, P = 0.001). Chronic GVHD was not prognostic for these outcomes. In conclusion, GVHD and GVL are strongly associated with contemporary SCT. However, following PTCy, GVHD is not associated with reduced relapse., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is a preferred first-line treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Whether the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab to the VRd regimen would reduce the risk of disease progression or death among patients ineligible to undergo transplantation is unclear., Methods: In an international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation to receive either isatuximab plus VRd or VRd alone. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points included a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in patients with a complete response., Results: A total of 446 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 59.7 months, the estimated progression-free survival at 60 months was 63.2% in the isatuximab-VRd group, as compared with 45.2% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.60; 98.5% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was significantly higher in the isatuximab-VRd group than in the VRd group (74.7% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.01), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status and a complete response (55.5% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.003). No new safety signals were observed with the isatuximab-VRd regimen. The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment and the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Isatuximab-VRd was more effective than VRd as initial therapy in patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation. (Funded by Sanofi and a Cancer Center Support Grant; IMROZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03319667.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Information on late complications in patients with acute leukemia who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is limited. We performed a left-truncated analysis of long-term survival in patients with acute leukemia who were alive and disease-free 2 years after HCT. We included 2701 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 9027 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent HCT between 2005 and 2012. The 10-year overall survival (OS) rate was 81.3% for ALL and 76.2% for AML, with the main causes of late mortality being relapse (ALL-33.9%, AML-44.9%) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (ALL-29%, AML-18%). At 10 years, HCT-related mortality was 16.8% and 20.4%, respectively. Older age and unrelated donor transplantation were associated with a worse prognosis for both types of leukemia. In addition, transplantation in the second or third complete remission and peripheral blood HSC for ALL are associated with worse outcomes. Similarly, adverse cytogenetics, female donor to male patient combination, and reduced intensity conditioning in AML contribute to poor prognosis. We conclude that 2-year survival in remission after HCT for acute leukemia is encouraging, with OS of nearly 80% at 10 years. However, the long-term mortality risk of HCT survivors remains significantly higher than that of the age-matched general population. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring transplantation strategies to improve long-term outcomes in patients with acute leukemia undergoing HCT., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Hematology Association.)

Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) is a common toxicity associated with an important morbidity after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy. Multiple factors seem to be involved in the development of severe ICAHT, making its management difficult. Here, we report three cases of severe ICAHT after axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma showing an expansion of large granular lymphocyte in the bone marrow with a CD3/CD57-positive non-CAR-T immunophenotype. We show that it is possible to treat them with low-dose steroids, obtaining a striking resolution of cytopenias with no deleterious impact on the underlying malignancy., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Not available.

This international questionnaire survey aimed to explore the current incidence, diagnostic policies, management, and outcomes of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) among healthcare providers involved in the management of these patients. A questionnaire was e-mailed to practitioners with an interest in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Of the respondents, 144 of 215 (67.0%) felt that early detection or diagnosis of VOD/SOS was difficult. Regarding diagnostic criteria, 142 (66.1%) already declared using the 2023 EBMT refined criteria. Most respondents (163/215, 75.8%) found these recent refined EBMT criteria useful for diagnosis, and 193 (89.8%) found the severity criteria easy to use. The major risk factors identified for VOD/SOS were a second allo-HCT (41.4%), pre-existing liver disease (54.9%), and prior use of antibody-drug conjugates (49.8%). Preferences for starting VOD/SOS treatment varied, with 61 (28.4%) preferring initiating therapy at a mild stage, and 122 (56.7%) preferring the moderate stage. In summary, this survey provided valuable insight into the challenges and opportunities of the identification and management of VOD/SOS. By improving current knowledge and increasing collaboration among healthcare professionals, early detection, management, and clinical outcomes for patients with this potentially serious complication can also be improved., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation is a standard treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), Hodgkin lymphoma and various subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells is standard practice that allows time for delivery of conditioning regimen prior to cell infusion. The aim of this Worldwide Network for Blood & Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) work was to assess existing evidence on non-cryopreserved autologous transplants through a systematic review/meta-analysis, to study feasibility and safety of this approach. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS for studies that utilized non-cryopreserved autologous PBSC transplantation. Identified literature was reviewed for information on mobilization, apheresis, preservation and viability, conditioning regimen, engraftment, response, and survival. Results highlight collective experience from 19 transplant centers (1686 patients), that performed autologous transplants using non-cryopreserved PBSCs. The mean of infused CD34+ was 5.6 × 10 6 /kg. Stem cell viability at transplantation was >90% in MM and >75% in lymphomas, after a storage time of 24-144 h at +4 °C. Mean time-to-neutrophil engraftment was 12 days and 15.3 days for platelets. Pooled proportion estimates of day 100 transplant-related mortality and graft failure were 1% and 0%, respectively. Non-cryopreservation of apheresed autologous PBSCs appears feasible and safe., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Competing Interests: TA declares consulting fees from Biotest and Amgen; honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Biotest; receiving meeting or travel support from Biotest, Sandoz, Novartis, Astellas Pharma, and Viatris; and leadership or fiduciary roles for the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (unpaid, responsible for practice harmonisation group). MM declares grants or contracts (outside of the present Series papers) from Sanofi, Novartis, and Janssen; consulting fees from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, Takeda, and MaaT; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Janssen; and leadership or fiduciary role for European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the International Academy for Clinical Hematology. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Sexual health is important for the quality of life of patients who have received haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Sexual dysfunction and couple dissatisfaction can seriously affect a patient's recovery and treatment process. However, this aspect of post-transplantation recovery is still usually neglected in clinical practice. In this Series paper, we aim to elucidate the emotional and psychosocial factors affecting the sexual function in these patients, with a special focus on the partner's role and the psychological consequences of some adverse effects of HSCT. Moreover, we provide an overview of the management approaches and assessment tools of psychological issues associated with sexual dysfunction reported in the literature. These tools can help clinicians in this field to plan essential lifestyle and clinical interventions to help their patients. In conclusion, screening for psychological issues is indispensable when approaching sexual dysfunction in patients with HSCT. Health-care teams in transplantation units should be trained to discuss this aspect of recovery and provide the required treatment and follow-up plan., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests LA declares a PhD scholarship by PAUSE (Programme d'aide à l'Accueil en Urgence des Scientifiques en Exil). YC has received honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Incyte, Jazz, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, and Takeda; and travel support from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Incyte, Jazz, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. AL is an unpaid member of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Patient Advocacy Committee (board member). HS declares grants or contracts, paid to her institution, from Novartis and the Belgian Hematological Society; consulting fees, paid to her institution, from Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, and Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events, paid to her institution, from Novartis and the Belgian Hematological Society; support for attending meetings and travel, paid to her institution, from Pfizer, Gilead, EBMT, and Center for International Bone Marrow Transplantation Research; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (unpaid); and leadership or fiduciary roles for EBMT (unpaid), the Center for International Bone Marrow Transplantation Research (unpaid voluntary work), and Belgian Hematological Society (unpaid). TA declares consulting fees from Biotest and Amgen; honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from biotest; receiving meeting or travel support from Biotest, Sandoz, Novartis, Astellas Pharma, and Viatris; and leadership or fiduciary roles for the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (unpaid, responsible for practice harmonisation group). MM declares grants or contracts (outside of the present Series papers) from Sanofi, Novartis, and Janssen; consulting fees from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, Takeda, and MaaT; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Janssen; and leadership or fiduciary role for EBMT and the International Academy for Clinical Hematology. FM declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Therakos–Mallinckrodt, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Astrazeneca, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, and Novartis. ZP declares consulting fees from Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Therakos, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Astrazeneca; and was the transplant complications working party chair for EBMT. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Sexual health is an important aspect of a person's life. Many patients and haematologists believe that intimacy and sexuality issues are substantial during cancer treatment. The haematological cancer disease, diagnosis, shock of the announcement, treatment, and follow-up appointments, can all have negative effects on the quality of life of patients, their partners, other family members, and friends. Addressing the intimate aspects of patients' lives not only enhances their wellbeing but also contributes to the quality of their survivorship. Progress has been made in the management of sexual life-related complications; however, novel strategies in coordination with a multidisciplinary team need to be implemented. New and comprehensive approaches must be developed on a multidisciplinary scale. In this Series paper, we discuss the factors affecting the sexual life of patients with haematological malignancies, different methods to assess sexual function, as well as management approaches of sexual wellbeing among patients with haematological cancers., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TA declares consulting fees from Biotest and Amgen; received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Biotest; received meeting and travel support from Biotest, Sandoz, Novartis, Astellas Pharma, and Viatris; is a member of Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire; and is responsible of practice harmonisation group and committee for the Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (unpaid). MM declares grants or contracts (out the present manuscript) from Sanofi, Novartis, and Janssen; received consulting fees from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, Takeda, and MaaT; was a participant of a Data Safety Monitoring Board and Advisory Board for Janssen; has a leadership and fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, and advocacy group, (unpaid) for European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and International Academy for Clinical Hematology. EB declares consulting fees from Pfizer and Astellas; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Novartis, Astellas, Alexion, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, MSD, Keocyt, Amgen, Beigen, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; declared support for attending meetings and travel from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) represents 12-15% of all AML cases. Although CBF positivity infers a survival advantage, overall survival (OS) remains dismal. Treatment is with cytarabine/anthracycline-based chemotherapy induction followed by high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is reserved for relapse or for patients having not achieved MRD-negativity at high risk for relapse. The role of SCT in first complete remission (CR1) remains controversial and is considered in high risk conditions. In this retrospective, multi-national, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-based study, we identified 1901 patients with de novo CBF-AML who received an allo-SCT or autologous transplantation (ASCT) in CR1. 65.5% harbored t(8;21) and 34.4% inv(16). In this group, the majority (77%) were treated with allo-SCT in CR1. In multivariate analysis, treatment with allo-SCT was an independent and significant, negative predictor of NRM and OS (HR 4.26, p < 0.0001 and HR 1.67, p = 0.003) and among patients treated with allo-SCT, those treated with MSD had the best outcomes, comparable to those treated with ASCT. There was no interaction between the type of transplant and MRD status at time of SCT. In both, MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups, NRM was worse in the allo-SCT group (MRD-: 12.9% vs 5.2%, p = 0.007; MRD+: 10.6% vs 0%, p = 0.004). We therefore demonstrated that consolidation in CR1 with allo-SCT results in worse outcomes than ASCT. Whether consolidation with ASCT yields better outcomes than chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy in combination with Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin is yet to be investigated., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may impact the outcome of patients undergoing T-cell replete hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We retrospectively analyzed 2427 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission transplanted from a haploidentical (n = 1844) or unrelated donor (UD, n = 583) using cyclosporine A (CSA, 63%) or tacrolimus (TAC, 37%) and PT-Cy/MMF. In univariate analysis, CSA and TAC groups did not differ in 2-year leukemia-free or overall survival, cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse or non-relapse mortality. CI of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD was lower with TAC (6.6% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.02), without difference in grade II-IV acute GVHD or grade III-IV acute GVHD/severe chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (GRFS). In multivariate analysis, TAC was associated with a lower risk of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD solely with haploidentical donors (HR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.98], p = 0.04), but not UD (HR 0.49 [95% CI, 0.2-1.21], p = 0.12). There was no significant difference for chronic GVHD. In conclusion, PT-Cy/MMF-based GVHD prophylaxis resulted in favorable OS and GRFS, irrespective of the CNI added. In haploidentical HCT, TAC seemed to prevent severe acute GVHD more effectively than CSA without impact on other outcome parameters., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with translocation t(8;16)(p11;p13) represents a rare entity that has been categorized as a disease-defining recurring cytogenetic abnormality with adverse risk in the 2022 European LeukemiaNet classification. This rating was mainly based on a retrospective analysis comprising patients from several large clinical trials, which, however, included only 21 patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Therefore, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation performed a registry study on a larger cohort to evaluate the role of alloSCT in t(8;16) AML. Sixty transplant recipients with t(8;16) AML were identified. Two-year overall and leukemia-free survival (OS/LFS) was 43/39%. Patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1, n = 44) achieved a 2-year OS/LFS of 48%/48%. Following alloSCT in CR1, the multivariable analysis identified a complex karyotype (CK) as a major risk factor for relapse (HR 4.17, p = .016), lower LFS (HR 3.38, p = .01), and lower OS (HR 3.08, p = .017). Two-year OS/LFS of patients with CK was 19%/19%, in contrast to 67%/67% in patients with t(8;16) outside a CK. Other factors for inferior outcomes were older age and secondary AML. In summary, alloSCT could mitigate the adverse risk of patients with t(8;16) AML not harboring a CK, particularly when performed in CR1., (© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Multiple myeloma patients aged 80 years and older are a population more prone to comorbidities and frailty. We aim to describe the real-life management and outcomes of this population. EMMY is a descriptive large-scale study., Patients: Between 2017 and 2021 we included 4383 patients of which 894 (20.3%) were aged ≥ 80 years. Four cohorts of patients aged ≥ 80 years were analysed: line 1 (L1), line 2 (L2), line 3 (L3) or line 4+ (L4+)., Results: The proportion of patients ≥ 80 years old was 20.8% in L1, 21.3% in L2, 20.9% in L3 and 17.8% in L4+. L1 patients received more treatment including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) (42.9%), L2 patients received mainly an immunomodulator (IMID) (65.9%) or an anti-CD38 (31.5%). For L3, IMID was used in 71.4% than an anti-CD38 (33.5%). L4+ patients received a PI (40.6%), IMID (33.2%) or an anti-CD38 (29.1%). Regarding efficacy, the median progression-free survival was 18.4 months in L1, 15.1 months in L2, 10.4 months in L3 and 6.5 months in L4+. The median overall survival was 49 months in L1, 31.3 months in L2, 21.4 months in L3 and 13.6 months in L4+., Conclusion: EMMY cohort confirmed that patients ≥ 80 years of age represent an important proportion of MM patients, in the de novo or relapse setting. This study is an important step in improving our comprehension and management of treatment in elderly patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal choice for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) remains debatable. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) are two common strategies, but little is known about their combination., Methods: Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, the authors identified 3649 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent haplo-SCT in complete remission between 2007 and 2021 at 260 EBMT-participating centers who received either PTCy (n = 2999), ATG (n = 358), or combination prophylaxis (n = 292). Cord blood transplants, combined bone marrow and peripheral grafts, and transplants with ex vivo graft manipulation were excluded. Median follow-up was 31.8 months., Results: On multivariate analysis, adjusting for patient age and performance status, disease status at transplant, cytogenetic risk, conditioning intensity, stem cell source, female-to-male graft, and donor and patient CMV status, we present the following. Compared to PTCy, ATG had a higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; p = .003), worse leukemia-free survival (HR, 1.4; p = .002), overall survival (HR, 1.49; p = .0009), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (HR, 1.29; p = .012). The combination of PTCy and ATG, however, led to significantly reduced rates of grade 2-4 (HR, 0.51; p = .0003) and grade 3-4 (HR, 0.5; p = .018) acute GVHD and did not affect any transplant outcomes compared to PTCy without ATG., Conclusion: The authors conclude that ATG alone is a less effective prophylaxis strategy compared to PTCy, however, the combination of PTCy and ATG is superior to either monotherapy. They propose that this combination could be considered a potential new standard of care for GVHD prophylaxis in haplo-SCT for AML., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), received early access program (EAP) authorization in France in April 2021 for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We conducted a real-world registry-based multicentre observational study in 11 French hospitals to evaluate ide-cel outcomes. Data from 176 RRMM patients who underwent apheresis between June 2021 and November 2022 were collected from the French national DESCAR-T registry. Of these, 159 patients (90%) received ide-cel. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 90% with 2% grade ≥3, and neurotoxicity occurred in 12% with 3% grade ≥3. Over the first 6 months, the best overall response and ≥complete response rates were 88% and 47% respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) from the ide-cel infusion was 12.5 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 20.8 months and the estimated OS rate at 12 months was 73.3%. Patients with extra-medullary disease (EMD) had impaired PFS (6.2 months vs. 14.8 months). On multivariable analysis, EMD and previous exposure to BCMA-targeted immunoconjugate or T-cell-redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody were associated with inferior PFS. Our study supports ide-cel's feasibility, safety and efficacy in real-life settings, emphasizing the importance of screening for EMD and considering prior treatments to optimize patient selection., (© 2024 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

An increasing number of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Normally, older patients have older matched related donors (MRD). Matched unrelated donors (MUD) are an important alternative, but it remains unclear whether a younger MUD is associated with better outcomes, especially in the context of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We compared outcomes of patients older than 50 years with AML in first complete remission (CR1) and receiving a first HSCT from a 10/10 MUD aged younger than 40 years to those receiving a graft from a MRD aged older than 50 years, using PTCy and with well-known transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. A total of 345 consecutive patients were included and classified according to TCI score as low, intermediate, or high. On multivariable analysis in the TCI-intermediate/high group, MUD was associated with better graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival, lower non-relapse mortality and lower relapse incidence. For patients receiving a TCI-low regimen, outcomes are independent on the type of donor. In patients with AML in CR1, older than 50 years and receiving a TCI-intermediate/high conditioning regimen using PTCy, a MUD younger than 40 years is preferable over a MRD older than 50 years., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) constitutes a distinctive cytogenetic entity associated with challenging outcomes, particularly in adult patients. Current upfront chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies include first, second and third-generation TKIs that have revolutionized patient outcomes including molecular remission and overall survival. Chemotherapy-free regimens such as blinatumomab-dasatinib or blinatumomab-ponatinib offer exciting possibilities, yet challenges arise, particularly in preventing central nervous system relapse. Monitoring measurable residual disease is now a cornerstone particularly using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-Clonoseq for accurate assessment. Controversy regarding the ability to omit consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation, specifically for patients achieving early molecular remission, is related to the excellent survival achieved with novel combinations in the upfront setting, however challenged by the lower disease control when transplant is utilized beyond first remission. Post-transplant maintenance introduces new dilemmas: the optimal TKI, dosing, and duration of therapy are open questions. Meanwhile, a myriad of new combinations and cellular therapies are used for relapsed Ph+ ALL, prompting us to unravel the optimal sequencing of these promising regimen. In this review, we delve into the breakthroughs and controversies in Ph+ ALL with ten commonly asked questions., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) predominantly affects individuals in late childhood and young adulthood. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative modality particularly in the setting of poor risk genetics and/or persistent minimal residual disease. Limited studies have directly explored the impact of patient- and transplant-related factors on post-transplant outcomes in T-ALL. Using a large dataset from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, we identified 1907 adult T-ALL patients (70% male) who underwent their first allo-HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) from matched sibling donors (MSD; 45%), unrelated donors (UD; 43%) or haploidentical donors (12%) between 2010 and 2021. The median age at transplant was 33.4 years (18.1-75). The median follow up was 2.9 years. Most patients underwent total body irradiation (TBI)-based myeloablative conditioning (69%). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 69.4%, and leukemia -free survival (LFS) was 62.1%. In multivariate analysis, advanced age at transplant negatively affected LFS (for each 10-year increment, HR = 1.11, p = 0.004), GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR = 1.06, p = 0.04), OS (HR = 1.12, p = 0.002), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 1.23, p < 0.001). More recent years of allo-HSCT were associated with improved GFRS (For each 3-year increment, HR = 0.89, p < 0.001), OS (HR = 0.9, p = 0.02), and decreased NRM (HR = 0.82, p = 0.008). TBI improved LFS. (HR = 0.79, p = 0.02), GRFS (HR = 0.83, p = 0.04), and relapse incidence (RI) (HR = 0.65, p < 0.001). Female-to-male transplant negatively affected GRFS (HR = 1.21, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 1.23, p = 0.048). In vivo T-cell depletion significantly improved GFRS (HR = 0.74, p < 0.001). This large study identified prognostic factors, such as age at transplant conditioning regimen, in influencing post-transplant in adult T-ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Importantly, a significant improvement over time was noted. These findings hold great promise for new adapted treatment strategies and can serve as a benchmark for future studies in that setting., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

We compared relapse incidence (RI) post-unrelated transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) versus no PTCy graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, in 7049 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in remission, 707 with PTCy, and 6342 without (No PTCy). The patients in the PTCy group were younger, 52.7 versus 56.6 years (p < .001). There were more 9/10 donors in the PTCy group, 33.8% versus 16.4% (p < .001), and more received myeloablative conditioning, 61.7% versus 50.2% (p < .001). In the No PTCy group, 87.7% of patients received in vivo T-cell depletion. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were lower in the PTCy versus No PTCy group, 93.8% and 80.9% versus 97.6% and 92.6% (p < .001). RI was not significantly different in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, hazard ratio (HR) of 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.37) (p = .31). Acute GVHD grades II-IV and III-IV, were significantly lower in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.92, p = .007) and HR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.83, p = .004), as were total and extensive chronic GVHD, HRs of 0.5 (95% CI 0.41-0.62, p < .001) and HR = 0.31 (95% CI 0.22-0.42, p < .001). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower with PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.5-0.91, p = .007). GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.81, p = .001). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between the groups. In summary, we observed comparable RI, OS, and LFS, significantly lower incidences of GVHD and NRM, and significantly higher GRFS in AML patients undergoing unrelated donor-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with PTCy versus No PTCy GVHD prophylaxis., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Abstract: We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients with primary refractory (PR) or first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML; n = 129) vs those with de novo AML (n = 590), who received HSCT between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of patients with sAML vs de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs 58.6%; P = .002). In 81.4% of patients with sAML , the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (P = .13). In multivariate analysis, haplo-HSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups: nonrelapse mortality hazard ratio (HR), 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.98; P = .083), relapse incidence HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.4.7.-1.00; P = .051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and GVHD and relapse-free survival were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.76-1.28; P = .94), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.29; P = .97), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.27; P = .94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of haplo-HSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison with PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a chronic hematologic malignancy that remains incurable, because most patients eventually relapse or become refractory to current treatments. MM is a major health problem, with a globally increasing incidence. While, increase in the choice of MM treatment, including new immunotherapies (bispecific monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy), may allow to further improve MM patients' outcomes, some non-therapy-related key issues may represent a pre-requisite towards improving MM outcomes in the next few years. This includes, the necessity of real-world evidence data, of a better definition of frailty, of a dynamic disease risk assessment, of a better definition of high-risk disease, broader accessibility to novel drugs, and to ensure diversity and representation of underrepresented groups. These key issues will be discussed in the current perspective review., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Given the selection of elderly patients with AML in first complete remission (CR1) the advantage of consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) over chemotherapy is still unclear. Newly diagnosed AML patients in CR1 aged 60-75 years were registered and a donor search initiated. After one consolidation cycle, patients with a matched donor were randomized to HCT with fludarabine/lowdose total body irradiation and cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression or conventional non-HCT. Primary outcome was restricted mean leukemia-free survival (RM-LFS) up to five years. Between 2010 and 2017, 245 patients (median age 67 years) were registered at CR1. After one consolidation, 26.9% of patients failed inclusion criteria. Of the 179 (73%) patients still on study, 75.4% had an HLA identical donor. Ten ineligible patients were excluded, and 125 randomized to HCT (n=83) or non-HCT (n=42). The primary outcome RM-LFS up to 5 years was 24.5 months (95%CI:18.9-30.1) in the HCT and 15.6 months (95%CI:10.4-20.8) in the non-HCT arm (p=0.022) due to a decrease in cumulative relapse incidence from 91.1 (95%CI:80.7-100.0) after non-HCT to 37.8 (95%CI:27.2-48.4)% after HCT (p.

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are now used in routine practice for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Severe (grade ≥ 3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are still the most concerning acute toxicities leading to frequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonging hospitalization, and adding significant cost to treatment. We report on the incidence of CRS and ICANS and the outcomes in a large cohort of 925 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in France based on patient data captured through the DESCAR-T registry. CRS of any grade occurred in 778 patients (84.1%), with 74 patients (8.0%) with grade 3 CRS or higher, while ICANS of any grade occurred in 375 patients (40.5%), with 112 patients (12.1%) with grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Based on the parameters selected by multivariable analyses, two independent prognostic scoring systems (PSS) were derived, one for grade ≥ 3 CRS and one for grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CRS-PSS included bulky disease, a platelet count < 150 G/L, a C-reactive protein (CRP) level > 30 mg/L and no bridging therapy or stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 CRS. ICANS-PSS included female sex, low level of platelets (< 150 G/L), use of axi-cel and no bridging therapy or SD/PD after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Both scores were externally validated in international cohorts of patients treated with tisa-cel or axi-cel., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: CASSIOPEIA part 1 demonstrated superior depth of response and prolonged progression-free survival with daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) alone as an induction and consolidation regimen in transplant-eligible patients newly diagnosed with myeloma. In CASSIOPEIA part 2, daratumumab maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival and increased minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rates versus observation. Here, we report long-term study outcomes of CASSIOPEIA., Methods: CASSIOPEIA was a two-part, open-label, phase 3 trial of patients done at 111 European academic and community-based centres. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pre-transplant induction and post-transplant consolidation with D-VTd or VTd. Patients who completed consolidation and had a partial response or better were re-randomised (1:1) to intravenous daratumumab maintenance (16 mg/kg every 8 weeks) or observation for 2 years or less. An interactive web-based system was used for both randomisations, and randomisation was balanced using permuted blocks of four. Stratification factors for the first randomisation (induction and consolidation phase) were site affiliation, International Staging System disease stage, and cytogenetic risk status. Stratification factors for the second randomisation (maintenance phase) were induction treatment and depth of response in the induction and consolidation phase. The primary endpoint for the induction and consolidation phase was the proportion of patients who achieved a stringent complete response after consolidation; results for this endpoint remain unchanged from those reported previously. The primary endpoint for the maintenance phase was progression-free survival from second randomisation. Efficacy evaluations in the induction and consolidation phase were done on the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who underwent first randomisation, and efficacy analyses in the maintenance phase were done in the maintenance-specific intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who were randomly assigned at the second randomisation. This analysis represents the final data cutoff at the end of the study. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02541383., Findings: Between Sept 22, 2015 and Aug 1, 2017, 1085 patients were randomly assigned to D-VTd (n=543) or VTd (n=542); between May 30, 2016 and June 18, 2018, 886 were re-randomised to daratumumab maintenance (n=442) or observation (n=444). At the clinical cutoff date, Sept 1, 2023, median follow-up was 80·1 months (IQR 75·7-85·6) from first randomisation and 70·6 months (66·4-76·1) from second randomisation. Progression-free survival from second randomisation was significantly longer in the daratumumab maintenance group than the observation-alone group (median not reached [95% CI 79·9-not estimable (NE)] vs 45·8 months [41·8-49·6]; HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·40-0·59]; p<0·0001); benefit was observed with D-VTd with daratumumab maintenance versus D-VTd with observation (median not reached [74·6-NE] vs 72·1 months [52·8-NE]; 0·76 [0·58-1·00]; p=0·048) and VTd with daratumumab maintenance versus VTd with observation (median not reached [66·9-NE] vs 32·7 months [27·2-38·7]; 0·34 [0·26-0·44]; p<0·0001)., Interpretation: The long-term follow-up results of CASSIOPEIA show that including daratumumab in both the induction and consolidation phase and the maintenance phase led to superior progression-free survival outcomes. Our results confirm D-VTd induction and consolidation as a standard of care, and support the option of subsequent daratumumab monotherapy maintenance, for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma., Funding: Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome, Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology, and Janssen Research & Development., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PM served on advisory boards for and received honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVie, Sanofi, and Pfizer. CH received honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, AbbVie, and Pfizer. AP served in a consulting or advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Pfizer; and received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, and Takeda. BA received research funding (paid to institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb; received honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, and GSK; received travel funding from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and served on an advisory board for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda. KB has a direct financial relationship with Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Sanofi, and Pfizer. SZ received research support from Janssen and Takeda; and served on advisory boards for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Amgen, and Takeda. MD received honoraria from and served in a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Sanofi, and Stemline; and received research funding from Janssen. CS received consulting fees or honoraria from Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Amgen, Sanofi, and Pfizer. MMo received honoraria from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, and Sanofi; and received research funding from Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi. LK received honoraria from, served on advisory boards for, or received travel funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. MMa received honoraria from and served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Sanofi, and Takeda; received research funding from Janssen and Takeda; and received travel, accommodations, or expenses from Janssen and Sanofi. FO-P served on boards for Janssen, Sanofi, and Pfizer. MR served on an advisory board for Janssen and Pfizer; received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sanofi; gave lectures for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda; and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed by Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. JMSdC served on an advisory board and received honoraria from Janssen, Sanofi, GSK, and AbbVie; and received accommodations from Pfizer and Amgen. NWCJvdD received research support from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, Novartis, Cellectis, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and serves on advisory boards for Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Takeda, Roche, Novartis, Bayer, Adaptive, Merck, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Servier (all paid to institution). AB served on advisory boards for Janssen, Sanofi, Amgen, and Bristol Myers Squibb. CT served on an advisory board for and received honoraria from Janssen. NM served on an advisory board for Janssen. M-CV received travel support from Janssen and Sanofi. M-DL received travel expenses from Janssen. WH is an employee of Cytel and is a contractor for Johnson & Johnson. JW, CdB, MR, VV, RC, and JV are employees of Janssen and hold stock in Johnson & Johnson. AT is an employee of Janssen. JC served on advisory boards for Sanofi and Bristol Myers Squibb; served as a consultant for Janssen, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Adaptive; received research support from Sanofi and Bristol Myers Squibb; and received travel support from Janssen, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. PS served on an advisory board for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Pfizer; and received research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, and Karyopharm. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: For the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in first complete remission (CR) is preferred. However, whether the number of courses required to achieve CR has a prognostic impact is unclear. It is unknown which factors remain important in patients requiring more than one course of induction to attain remission., Methods: This Acute Leukaemia Working Party study from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation identified adults who received an allograft in first CR from either a fully matched sibling or 10/10 or 9/10 human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, or HLA-DQ). Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to identify the prognostic impact of one or two courses of induction to attain CR., Results: A total of 4995 patients were included with 3839 (77%) patients attaining a CR following one course of induction chemotherapy (IND1), and 1116 patients requiring two courses (IND2) to attain CR. IND2 as compared to IND1 was a poor prognostic factor in a univariate analysis and remained so in a multivariate Cox model, resulting in an increased hazard ratio of relapse (1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.64; p = .0003) and of death (1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47; p = .002). Adverse prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis of the outcomes of patients requiring IND2 included age, FLT3-ITD, adverse cytogenetics, and performance status. Pretransplant measurable residual disease retained a prognostic impact regardless of IND1 or IND2., Conclusion: Initial response to chemotherapy as determined by number of courses to attain CR, retained prognostic relevance even following SCT in CR., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) of the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Vedolizumab is a gut-selective anti-α 4 β 7 integrin monoclonal antibody that reduces gut inflammation by inhibiting migration of GI-homing T lymphocytes. The efficacy and safety of vedolizumab added to standard GVHD prophylaxis (calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate/mycophenolate mofetil) was evaluated for prevention of lower-GI aGVHD after unrelated donor allo-HSCT in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Enrollment closed early during the COVID-19 pandemic with 343 patients randomized (n = 174 vedolizumab, n = 169 placebo), and 333 received ≥1 intravenous dose of 300 mg vedolizumab (n = 168) or placebo (n = 165) and underwent allo-HSCT. The primary end point was met; Kaplan-Meier (95% confidence interval) estimated rates of lower-GI aGVHD-free survival by day +180 after allo-HSCT were 85.5% (79.2-90.1) with vedolizumab versus 70.9% (63.2-77.2) with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.73; P < 0.001). For the 5 key secondary efficacy end points analyzed by day +180 after allo-HSCT, rates of lower-GI aGVHD-free and relapse-free survival and grade C-D aGVHD-free survival were significantly higher with vedolizumab versus placebo. No significant treatment differences were found for the other key secondary end points of non-relapse mortality, overall survival and grade B-D aGVHD-free survival, respectively. Incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events analyzed in patients receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment (n = 334) was 6.5% (n = 11 of 169) vedolizumab versus 8.5% (n = 14 of 165) placebo. When added to standard calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prevention, lower-GI aGVHD-free survival was significantly higher with vedolizumab versus placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03657160 ., (© 2024. Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.)

CD38-targeting immunotherapy is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) that are transplant ineligible (TI) and is considered the best standard of care (SOC). To improve current SOC, we evaluated the added value of weekly bortezomib (V) to isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaRd versus Isa-VRd). This Intergroupe Francophone of Myeloma phase 3 study randomized 270 patients with NDMM that were TI, aged 65-79 years, to IsaRd versus Isa-VRd arms. The primary endpoint was a minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate at 10 -5 by next-generation sequencing at 18 months from randomization. Key secondary endpoints included response rates, MRD assessment rates, survival and safety. The 18-month MRD negativity rates at 10 -5 were reported in 35 patients (26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19-34) in IsaRd versus 71 (53%, 95% CI 44-61) in Isa-VRd (odds ratio for MRD negativity 3.16, 95% CI 1.89-5.28, P < 0.0001). The MRD benefit was consistent across subgroups at 10 -5 and 10 -6 , and was already observed at month 12. The proportion of patients with complete response or better at 18 months was higher with Isa-VRd (58% versus 33%; P < 0.0001), as was the proportion of MRD negativity and complete response or better (37% versus 17%; P = 0.0003). At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, no difference was observed for survival times (immature data). The addition of weekly bortezomib did not significantly affect the relative dose intensity of IsaRd. Isa-VRd significantly increased MRD endpoints, including the 18-month negativity rate at 10 -5 , the primary endpoint, compared with IsaRd. This study proposes Isa-VRd as a new SOC for patients with NDMM that are TI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04751877 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) during induction and consolidation, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), is a standard of care for patients with Philadelphia (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The goal of this study was to compare results of allo-HCT according to the type of TKI used pre-transplant, either imatinib, dasatinib or both. This was a retrospective, registry-based analysis including adult patients with Ph-positive ALL treated with allo-HCT between years 2010-2022. The analysis included 606 patients pre-treated with imatinib, 163 with dasatinib and 94 with both imatinib and dasatinib. Allo-HCTs were performed in first complete remission from either unrelated (56%), matched sibling (36%) or haploidentical donors (8%). Relapse incidence at 2 years was 26% in the imatinib group and 21% in the dasatinib group and 19% in the imatinib + dasatinib group (P = .06) while non-relapse mortality was 19%, 15%, and 23%, respectively (P = .37). No significant differences were found for leukemia-free survival (55% vs. 63% vs. 58%, P = .11) and overall survival (72% vs. 76% vs. 65%, P = .32). The incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was comparable across study groups, while the incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was significantly increased for patients pre-treated with dasatinib alone (20%) than in the imatinib group (10%) or imatinib + dasatinib group (13%) (P = .002). On multivariate analysis a chance of GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was significantly decreased while the risk of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was increased for the dasatinib compared to imatinib group (hazard ratio, HR = 1.27, P = .048 and HR = 2.26, P = .0009, respectively). This study provides no evidence for the advantage of one TKI over another in terms of LFS and OS. However, the use of dasatinib is associated with increased risk of severe acute GVHD and decreased GRFS., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Michael H. Tomasson: consulting or advisory roles for Janssen. Shinsuke Iida: honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; consulting or advisory roles for Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda; and research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Caelum Biosciences, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Ono, Otsuka, Sanofi, and Takeda. Ruben Niesvizky: consulting or advisory roles for Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Takeda and research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Takeda. Mohamad Mohty: honoraria from Amgen, Celgene; consulting or advisory roles for Adaptive Biotechnologies, GSK, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MaaT Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi, and Xenikos; personal fees from Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Pfizer, Stemline‐Menarini and Takeda; and speakers bureau roles for Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi. Nizar J. Bahlis: honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sanofi, and Takeda; consulting or advisory roles for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sanofi, and Takeda; and patents, royalties, and/or other intellectual property interests with Celgene and Janssen. Joaquin Martinez‐Lopez: consulting or advisory roles for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Novartis; research funding from Astellas and Bristol Myers Squibb; and speakers bureau roles for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen‐Cilag, and Roche. Paula Rodriguez‐Otero: consulting or advisory roles for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, and Sanofi; personal fees from AbbVie, Celgene, GSK, H3 Biomedicine, Janssen, Pfizer, and Sanofi; travel and accommodations expenses paid by Pfizer; and speakers bureau roles for Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, and Sanofi. Alexander M. Lesokhin: honoraria from iTeos Therapeutics, Janssen, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Trillium Therapeutics; consulting or advisory roles for Pfizer, Trillium Therapeutics, and Arcellx; personal fees from iTeos Therapeutics, Janssen, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Trillium Therapeutics; research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Trillium Therapeutics; and patents, royalties and/or other intellectual property interests with Serametrix. Andrea Viqueira, Eric Leip, Umberto Conte, and Sharon T. Sullivan: employment and stock ownership at Pfizer. Guenther Koehne: has no conflicts of interest.