1. A phase 1b/2b multicenter study of oral panobinostat plus azacitidine in adults with MDS, CMML or AML with ⩽30% blasts.
- Author
-
Garcia-Manero G, Sekeres MA, Egyed M, Breccia M, Graux C, Cavenagh JD, Salman H, Illes A, Fenaux P, DeAngelo DJ, Stauder R, Yee K, Zhu N, Lee JH, Valcarcel D, MacWhannell A, Borbenyi Z, Gazi L, Acharyya S, Ide S, Marker M, and Ottmann OG
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Azacitidine administration & dosage, Bone Marrow pathology, Female, Humans, Hydroxamic Acids administration & dosage, Indoles administration & dosage, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic mortality, Male, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Middle Aged, Myelodysplastic Syndromes mortality, Panobinostat, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute drug therapy, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic drug therapy, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic pathology, Myelodysplastic Syndromes drug therapy, Myelodysplastic Syndromes pathology
- Abstract
Treatment with azacitidine (AZA), a demethylating agent, prolonged overall survival (OS) vs conventional care in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). As median survival with monotherapy is <2 years, novel agents are needed to improve outcomes. This phase 1b/2b trial (n=113) was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of panobinostat (PAN)+AZA (phase 1b) and evaluate the early efficacy and safety of PAN+AZA vs AZA monotherapy (phase 2b) in patients with higher-risk MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia with <30% blasts. The MTD was not reached; the RP2D was PAN 30 mg plus AZA 75 mg/m
2 . More patients receiving PAN+AZA achieved a composite complete response ([CR)+morphologic CR with incomplete blood count+bone marrow CR (27.5% (95% CI, 14.6-43.9%)) vs AZA (14.3% (5.4-28.5%)). However, no significant difference was observed in the 1-year OS rate (PAN+AZA, 60% (50-80%); AZA, 70% (50-80%)) or time to progression (PAN+AZA, 70% (40-90%); AZA, 70% (40-80%)). More grade 3/4 adverse events (97.4 vs 81.0%) and on-treatment deaths (13.2 vs 4.8%) occurred with PAN+AZA. Further dose or schedule optimization may improve the risk/benefit profile of this regimen.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF