1. Efanesoctocog Alfa Versus Emicizumab in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors.
- Author
-
Álvarez Román MT, Kragh N, Guyot P, Wilson A, Wojciechowski P, Margas W, Wdowiak M, Santagostino E, and Arnaud A
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Adult, Hemorrhage chemically induced, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Male, Hemophilia A drug therapy, Hemophilia A complications, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Bispecific therapeutic use, Antibodies, Bispecific administration & dosage, Factor VIII therapeutic use
- Abstract
Introduction: The phase 3 XTEND-1 trial (NCT04161495) demonstrated that efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis provided superior bleed protection compared with pre-trial factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A. The aim of this study was to indirectly compare the efficacy of efanesoctocog alfa with non-factor replacement therapy emicizumab in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors., Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify phase 3 trials of emicizumab. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were used to compare annualised bleeding rates (ABRs) for any, treated, joint, and spontaneous bleeds, and joint health (measured using Hemophilia Joint Health Score [HJHS]), between efanesoctocog alfa and emicizumab. Estimated effects for different emicizumab regimens were pooled using random-effect meta-analysis to evaluate the overall difference in bleed outcomes between efanesoctocog alfa and emicizumab., Results: One emicizumab trial was included (HAVEN 3), which investigated three dosing regimens. In meta-analyses, efanesoctocog alfa once-weekly (Q1W) was associated with significantly lower ABRs for any (incidence rate ratio [95% CI] 0.33 [0.20; 0.53]), any treated (0.49 [0.30; 0.80]) and treated joint (0.51 [0.28; 0.91]) bleeds compared with emicizumab Q1W in non-inhibitor patients with prior prophylaxis or on-demand treatment. Efanesoctocog alfa Q1W was also associated with a significantly better improvement from baseline in HJHS Joint Score (mean difference [95% CI] -2.06 [-3.97; -0.14]) and Total Score (-2.37 [-4.36; -0.39]) versus emicizumab Q1W or every 2 weeks., Conclusion: Efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower rates of any, treated, and joint bleeds and improved joint health compared with emicizumab in patients with severe haemophilia A., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Alix Arnaud, Amanda Wilson, and Patricia Guyot are Sanofi employees and may hold stock/stock options in Sanofi. Nana Kragh and Elena Santagostino are employees of Sobi and may hold stock/stock options in Sobi. Marlena Wdowiak and Wojciech Margas are employees of Putnam PHMR. Piotr Wojciechowski is a co-founder of Assignity and an external consultant at Putnam PHMR. María Teresa Álvarez Román has received reimbursement for attending symposia/congresses and/or honoraria for speaking and/or honoraria for consulting, and/or funds for research from Takeda, Bayer, CSL-Behring, Novo Nordisk, Sobi, Roche, Biomarin, Novartis, Amgen, and Pfizer. Piotr Wojciechowski’s and Wojciech Margas’ affiliation Assignity is now called Clever-Access. Ethical Approval: This is a post hoc analysis and modelling of data already collected and/or published data. Original studies were all approved by the relevant institutional review boards at each study site and were carried out in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation good clinical practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF