1. Outcomes after radical endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter retrospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Chan MW, Haidry R, Norton B, di Pietro M, Hadjinicolaou AV, Barret M, Doumbe Mandengue P, Seewald S, Bisschops R, Nafteux P, Bourke MJ, Gupta S, Mundre P, Lemmers A, Vuckovic C, Pech O, Leclercq P, Coron E, Meijer SL, Bergman J, and Pouw RE
- Abstract
Introduction Post-endoscopic resection (ER) management of high-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is debated, with conflicting reports on lymph node metastases (LNM) We aimed to assess outcomes following radical ER for high-risk T1 EAC. Methods We identified patients who underwent radical ER (tumor-negative deep margin) of high-risk T1 EAC, followed by surgery or endoscopic surveillance, between 2008-2019 across 11 international centers. Results In total, 106 patients (86 men, 70 ±11 years) were included. Of these, 26 patients (64 ±11 yrs) underwent additional surgery, with residual T1 EAC in 5 (19%) and LNM in 2 (8%) cases. After median 47 (IQR 32-79) months follow-up, 2/26 (8%) developed LNM/distant metastasis (DM), with 1 (4%) EAC-related death. There was 1/26 (4%) unrelated death and 4/26 (15%) were lost to follow-up. Eighty patients (71 ±9 yrs) entered endoscopic surveillance. Over 46 (IQR 25-59) months follow-up, 5/80 (6%) developed LNM/DM, with 4/80 (5%) EAC-related deaths. There were 15/80 (19%) unrelated deaths, and 10/80 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Overall rates during follow-up were 6% (95% CI 2-12) for LNM, 7% (95% CI 3-13) for LNM/DM, 5% (95% CI 2-11) for EAC-related mortality, and 20% (95% CI 13-29) for overall mortality. Conclusion Our findings present low rates of LNM after radical ER of high-risk T1 EAC, consistent with other endoscopy-focused studies. Post-surgical patients are still at risk for metastasis and disease-specific mortality. These results suggest that endoscopic surveillance is suitable for selected cases, but further prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and confirm optimal outcomes., Competing Interests: R. Haidry has received research support from Pentax Medical, Medtronic, AquaMedical, Odin Vision, Fractyl, Cook Medical, Endo gastric solutions and Apollo/BSC; M. di Pietro is consultant for Medtronic; M. Barret is a consultant for Medtronic, has contributed to boards for Ambu and Fujifilm, and has received funding from Olympus for medical training; R. Bisschops is supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (G072621N), has received consultancy fees, research support and speaker fees from Medtronic, Fujifilm and Pentax, and has received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific. M.J. Bourke has received research support from Olympus, Cook Medical and Boston Scientific; A. Lemmers has received research support from Boston Scientific and Medtronic, and speaker fees from Erbe; O. Pech has received speaker fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Falk, Aohua and Fujifilm; P. Leclercq has received speaker’s fee from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Erbe, Fujifilm; J.J.G.H.M. Bergman has received funding for institutional review board-approved research from C2Therapeutics and Pentax Medical, Medtronic, and Aqua Medical; R.E. Pouw is consultant for Medtronic, MicroTech, Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Cook, and has received fees from Olympus and Fujifilm. M.W. Chan, B. Norton, A.V. Hadjinicolaou, P. Doumbe-Mandengue, S. Seewald, P. Nafteux, S. Gupta, P. Mundre, C. Vuckovic, E. Coron and S.L. Meijer have no conflict of interest to report., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF