Search

Background: There is limited insight into the current disease burden and everyday clinical management of moderate-to- severe AD in Poland, Czechia, Russia, and Turkiye. Therefore, this study aimed to get information-driven insights regarding the current disease burden and clinical management of patients with moderate-to-severe AD with common and differentiating aspects of the patient journey and establish a consensus., Methods: In this modified 2-round Delphi panel, 133 questions were asked in total to 27 dermatologists. A consensus was achieved when 70% of the panel members strongly agreed or agreed (or strongly disagreed or disagreed) with an item. Statements with <40% agreement dropped from the Delphi rounds and were not repeated., Results: The results state that AD has a significant impact on the quality of life for both patients and their families with social and economic consequences in these countries. While there were significant dissimilarities regarding the current treatment approach by preference order and treatment duration among participants, there was also a high percentage of consensus on literature and guideline-based statements. Current topical therapies and the immune response modifiers were not found to be sufficient by panelists to cover the therapeutic needs of patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Moreover, panelists highlighted the significant burden of adverse events with the off-label use of currently available immunosuppressants., Conclusions: These results underlined that there is a significant disease burden with an unmet treatment need for patients with moderate-to-severe AD in Poland, Czechia, Russia, and Turkiye., Competing Interests: All panel members/authors received honoraria from Pfizer for their consultancy on answering the questionnaires. DF has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline and has received speaker honorarium from Abbvie, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Takeda, CSl Behring, AstraZeneca. MS has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Byers Squibb and has received speaker honorarium from Abbvie and Pfizer. AL'v has acted in advisory board of Bayer AG, Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, and Sanofi and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Sanofi, Janssen, Bayer AG, and Sun Pharma. MT has acted in advisory board of Sanofi, Abbvie, and Leopharma, has received speaker honorarium from Abbvie, Bioderma, LEO Pharma, Pierre Fabre, La Roche Possey, Bausch Health, Mead Johnson, Eli Lilly and subinvestigator in clinical trials sponsored by Amge, Novartyis, and Pfizer. MB has acted in advisory board of UCB, Sanofi, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie, and has received speaker honorarium from UCB, Sanofi, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Janssen, and Abbvie. AM has acted in advisory board of Bayer AG and has received honorarium from L'Oreal, Roche, and Novartis. ZP has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer, and Bristol Byers Squibb and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer and Abbvie. EA has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Johnson and Johnson, and Abbvie and has received speaker honorarium from Novartis, Johnson and Johnson, and Abbvie. AR has been a consultant or speaker for AbbVie, Bioderma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chema Elektromet, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Medac, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sandoz, and Trevi; and principal investigator or sub investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Abbvie, Argenx, Corbus, Drug Delivery Solutions Ltd., Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, Janssen, Kymab Limited, LEO Pharma, Menlo Therapeutics, MetrioPharm, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Trevi, and VielaBio. OE has acted in advisory boards of Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, and Sanofi and has received speaker honorarium from Abbvie, Sanofi, Berlin-Chemie/Menarini, and Eli-Lilly. EÖ has acted in advisory boards of Pfizer and Sanofi, and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer and Sanofi. MK has served as consultant, speaker, or investigator for Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. BE has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Lilly, and Abbvie and has received speaker honorarium from Novartis and Abbvie. EF has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer, Abbvie, Sanofi, and Eli Lilly and has received speaker honorarium from Novartis, Pfizer, Abbvie, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Berlin-Chemie/Menarini. WO has worked as a Consultant or Speaker and participated as Principal Investigator or Subinvestigator in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Alfasigma, Almirall, Bioderma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Egis, Eli Lilly, Galenica, Galderma, Janssen-Cilag, Leo Pharma, Medac GmbH, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and UCB Pharma. MC-O has acted in the Advisory Board of Novartis and Pfizer. OF has acted in advisory board of Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, Sanofi, and Janssen and was Principal Investigator in clinical studies of Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Abbvie, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis, and Janssen. NM has received research grants from Jansen, Eli Lilly, and Novartis; has acted in advisory board of Galderma, Pierre Fabre, Bayer, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, AbbVie, Amryt Pharma, Zeldis Pharma LLC companies and has received speaker honorarium from LEO Pharma, Abbvie, Novartis, and Viatris. AG has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, L'Oreal, and Piere Fabre. SB has received speaker honoraria/travel fees from LEO Pharma. ALe has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Abbvie, Leo pharma, Sandoz, Sanofi, and Jansssen Squibb and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Abbvie, Sandoz, Novartis, Leo pharma, Galderma, and Janssen. LR member of advisory boards –Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies, L'Oreal, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, UCB; invited speaker – Eli Lilly, Leo Pharma, Abbvie, L'Oreal, Lilly, and Pierre Fabre. SA has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer and Abbvie. BG is an employee of Pfizer., (Copyright © 2024 Trzeciak, Rudnicka, Arenberger, Engin, L'vov, Alper, Alpsoy, Benáková, Bobko, Borlu, Czarnecka-Operacz, Elisyutina, Ergun, Ertam, Fedenko, Filipovská, Fomina, Gadzhigoroeva, Kojanová, Lesiak, Michenko, Murashkin, Owczarek, Özkaya, Plzáková, Reich, Selerova and Gurbuz.)

Objectives: This study aims to update the understanding of Alopecia Areata (AA) in Poland, Czechia, Russia, and Türkiye, focusing on the disease burden, clinical management, and patient journey. It seeks to establish a consensus on optimal management strategies for AA in these regions., Methods: A modified 2-round Delphi panel was conveyed with 23 Dermatologists (Russia; 4, Türkiye; 7, Poland; 6, and Czechia; 6). The Delphi questionnaire consisted of 61 statements and 43 questions designed to obtain an overall understanding of the perception and acceptance of available information regarding the care of patients with alopecia areata., Results: The study revealed that moderate-to-severe AA significantly impacts patients' and their families' QoL, consistent with previous studies. AA was found to cause more substantial impairment when additional lesions appeared in visible areas besides the scalp. Work and productivity impairment were notably higher in adults with moderate-to-severe AA. Diagnostic consensus highlighted the importance of skin biopsies and trichoscopy, while the need for more practical severity scoring systems was emphasized. Current treatments, including topical therapies, corticosteroids, and systemic immune modifiers, were deemed insufficient, highlighting the unmet medical need., Conclusion: The Delphi study underscores a significant disease burden and unmet medical needs in patients with moderate-to-severe AA. It highlights the necessity of access to novel treatments and further research to develop more effective therapies with a tolerable safety profile. The findings align with global research, emphasizing the psychosocial impact of AA and the need for standardized, effective treatment protocols., Competing Interests: PA has acted in advisory board of AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Abbvie. MK has served as consultant, speaker, or investigator for Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. MC has acted on the advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb and has received a speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Abbvie, OF has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Lilly, LeoPharma, Almirall and in clinical studies Pfizer, Janssen, Lilly, Amgen, Abbvie, Novartis, Regeneron. AM has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb and has received speaker honorarium from L’Oreal, La Roche Posay. MT has been a speaker and/or consultant an/or investigator and/or participant of Advisory Board of Abbvie, BauschHealth, Bioderma, Eli Lilly, La Roche, Leo pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme. ZP has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Abbvie. IS has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Abbvie. WO received honorarium for lectures and clinical research from AbbVie, Aflofarm Farmacja, Alfasigma, Almirall, Amgen, Apotex Polska Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bausch Health Poland, Berlin Chemie Menarini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, EGIS, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Medac GmbH, Merck, Mylan Healthcare, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre Medicamente, TZF Polfa S.A., Roche Diagnostics, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, SUN-FARM, Teva Pharmaceuticals, UCB Pharma. AL has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Sanofie, Sandoz, Lilly, Janssen, Almiral and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Sanofie, Sandoz, Lilly, Almiral, UCB. AG has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer. NM reports grants and personal fees from Jansen, grants from Eli Lilly, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Galderma, personal fees from Pierre Fabre, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Leofarma, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from AbbVie, grants from Amryt Pharma, personal fees and non-financial support from Viatris, outside the submitted work. NB declare to have acted as member of Advisory Board of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals and has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer. SB has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, LEO PHARMAEB has acted in advisory board of Novartis and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals has received speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Abbvie. SA has acted in advisory board of Novartis, Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb, and has received honorarium from Pfizer and Abbvie. AR has worked as a consultant or speaker for AbbVie, Bioderma, Celgene, Chema Elektromet, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Medac, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sandoz and Trevi and has participated as principal investigator in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Anaptys, Argenx, Biogen, Biothera, BMS, Celltrion, Dermira, Dice, Evelo, Galderma, Genentech, Horizon Therapeutics, Incyte, Janssen, Kymab Ltd., Leo Pharma, Eli Lilly, Menlo Therapeutics, MetrioPharm, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, Trevi, and UCB. BG is an employee of Pfizer. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Rudnicka, Trzeciak, Alpsoy, Arenberger, Alper, Benáková, Bobko, Borlu, Czarnecka Operacz, Engin, Ergun, Sağduyu, Filipovská, Gadzhigoroeva, Kojanová, Lesiak, Michenko, Murashkin, Onsun, Owczarek, Plzakova, Reich, Selerová and Gürbüz.)

Background/objectives: This subgroup analysis of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 trial (NCT03732807) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral, selective dual JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA) in patients aged 12-17 years., Methods: In ALLEGRO-2b/3, patients aged ≥12 years with AA and ≥50% scalp hair loss received once-daily ritlecitinib 50 or 30 mg (±4-week 200-mg loading dose) or 10 mg or placebo for 24 weeks. In a subsequent 24-week extension period, ritlecitinib groups continued their doses, and patients initially assigned to placebo switched to 200/50 or 50 mg daily. Clinician- and patient-reported hair regrowth outcomes and safety were assessed., Results: In total, 105 adolescents were randomized. At Week 24, 17%-28% of adolescents achieved a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20 (≤20% scalp without hair) in the ritlecitinib 30 mg and higher treatment groups versus 0% for placebo. At Week 48, 25%-50% of patients had a SALT score ≤20 across ritlecitinib treatment groups (30 mg and higher). Adolescents reporting that their AA "moderately" or "greatly" improved were 45%-61% in the ritlecitinib groups (30 mg and higher) (vs. 10%-22% for placebo) at Week 24 and 44%-80% at Week 48. The most common adverse events in adolescents were headache, acne, and nasopharyngitis. No deaths, major adverse cardiovascular events, malignancies, pulmonary embolisms, opportunistic infections, or herpes zoster infections were reported., Conclusion: Ritlecitinib treatment demonstrated clinician-reported efficacy, patient-reported improvement, and an acceptable safety profile through Week 48 in adolescents with AA with ≥50% scalp hair loss., (© 2023 Pfizer Inc. Pediatric Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus vs other topical treatments in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD), focusing on children and sensitive skin areas. An SLR was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases on January 15th, 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with pimecrolimus as a study arm. Another SLR performed on October 5th, 2020 identified RCTs with a crisaborole study arm. Direct pair-wise meta-analysis was used to compare pimecrolimus with vehicle, tacrolimus or topical corticosteroids (TCS; n = 27 studies). Outcomes included Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score 0/1 up to week 6 and adverse events. Pimecrolimus was more efficacious than vehicle in achieving IGA 0/1 up to week 6 in children, and similar safety profiles were observed with pimecrolimus and vehicle in children and the mixed population, including on sensitive skin. No significant differences in efficacy and safety were observed between pimecrolimus and tacrolimus 0.03%. Efficacy and safety were similar for pimecrolimus and mild medium potency TCS; mildly potent steroids caused transient epidermal thinning in sensitive skin areas (not seen with pimecrolimus). Pimecrolimus can be considered as a first-line option for mild-to-moderate AD, particularly in children and sensitive skin areas.

The human skin barrier is structurally and functionally immature at birth, with elevated skin surface pH, lower lipid content, and lower resistance to chemicals and pathogens. Infants at risk for atopic dermatitis (AD) may present with xerosis almost immediately after birth. The current algorithm on skincare for newborns and infants aims to promote a healthy skin barrier and potential mitigation of AD. The project used a modified Delphi hybrid process comprising face-to-face discussions followed by an online follow-up replacing a questionnaire. During the meeting, a panel of eight clinicians who treat newborns and infants discussed the systematic literature review results and a draft algorithm addressing non-prescription skincare for neonates and infants. Online the panel reviewed and adopted the algorithm using evidence coupled with the panel's expert opinion and clinical experience. The algorithm provides clinical information for pediatric dermatologists, dermatologists, and pediatric healthcare providers treating neonates and infants. The advisors adopted a scale based on clinical signs for the algorithm: 1) scaling/xerosis; 2) erythema; and 3) erosion/oozing. Skincare for newborns and infants includes: aim for a cool environment and soft cotton clothing, give lukewarm baths (~5 min, 2-3 x week) with consideration of a gentle cleanser (pH 4-6) and the application of a full-body moisturizing after bath, while avoiding products with toxic and irritating ingredients. A growing body of evidence recognizes the benefits of ongoing daily use of non-alkaline cleansers and moisturizers. Gentle cleansers and moisturizers containing barrier lipids help maintain the protective skin barrier when applied from birth onwards.

Introduction: Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is one of the most severe forms of congenital epidermolysis bullosa and characterized by the formation of many surgical complications. Esophageal stenosis is a common complication of DEB and occurs in almost 76% of cases. Balloon dilatation (BD) under X-ray control is the main therapeutic technique, however conservative treatment is necessary to prevent restenosis. The use of the drug losartan is promising due to its antifibrotic effect through the suppression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)., Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of losartan in the prevention of restenosis after BD of esophageal stenosis in children with DEB., Materials and Methods: The study included 19 children from 2 to 16 years old (mean age 9.2 ± 3.58 years) with DEB and X-ray confirmed esophageal stenosis. All children underwent BD. In the main group 9 children after BD have received losartan, in the control group of 10 children - only standard therapy. The observation period was 12 months., Results: In the main group, 1 child (11.1%) required repeated dilatation, in the control group - 4 children (40%). Indicators of nutritional deficiency (THINC scale) and the disease severity index (EBDASI) were significantly lower in the group of children treated with losartan. No undesirable actions of the drug were recorded., Conclusions: In this study losartan showed its safety, contributed to a decrease in the restenosis frequency and an improvement in the nutritional status of children with DEB after BD. However, further studies are required to confirm its effectiveness., Level of Evidence: IV., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The pathogenic variants of genes encoding proteins, participating in the formation and functioning of epidermis and dermo-epidermal junctions, create a large variety of clinical phenotypes from: small localized to severe generalized dermatitis, as well as early, or even, prenatal death due to extensive epidermis loss. The diagnostic panel in this study was developed for the purposes of identifying these pathogenic genetic variants in 268 Russian children, who possessed the epidermolysis bullosa symptom complex in a selection of 247 families. This panel included the targeted areas of 33 genes, which are genetic variants that can lead to the development of the phenotype mentioned above. The usage of next generation sequencing allowed the revelation of 192 various altered alleles (of which 109 alleles were novel, i.e., had not been described previously). In addition, it allowed the definition of the genetic variants that are both typical for most of the examined children and for the separate ethnic groups inhabiting modern Russia. We found that the most characteristic mutations for the Dargin and Chechen ethnic groups are the c.3577del deletion in the COL7A1 gene and the c.2488G>A missense mutation in the COL17A1 gene, respectively. In addition, the study of haplotypes of microsatellite markers, which we managed to conduct in the Dargin population, confirmed the presence of the founder effect.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions regarding the management of chronic skin diseases, especially in patients on systemic treatments. Data concerning the use of biologics in adults with psoriasis are reassuring, but data specific to children are missing. Moreover, COVID-19 could impact the course of psoriasis in children., Objectives: The aim of this study was therefore to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the psoriasis of children, and the severity of the infection in relation to systemic treatments., Methods: We set up an international registry of paediatric psoriasis patients. Children were included if they were under 18 years of age, had a history of psoriasis, or developed it within 1 month of COVID-19 and had COVID-19 with or without symptoms., Results: One hundred and twenty episodes of COVID-19 in 117 children (mean age: 12.4 years) were reported. The main clinical form of psoriasis was plaque type (69.4%). Most children were without systemic treatment (54.2%); 33 (28.3%) were on biologic therapies, and 24 (20%) on non-biologic systemic drugs. COVID-19 was confirmed in 106 children (88.3%) and 3 children had two COVID-19 infections each. COVID-19 was symptomatic for 75 children (62.5%) with a mean duration of 6.5 days, significantly longer for children on non-biologic systemic treatments (P = 0.02) and without systemic treatment (P = 0.006) when compared with children on biologics. The six children who required hospitalization were more frequently under non-biologic systemic treatment when compared with the other children (P = 0.01), and particularly under methotrexate (P = 0.03). After COVID-19, the psoriasis worsened in 17 cases (15.2%). Nine children (8%) developed a psoriasis in the month following COVID-19, mainly a guttate form (P = 0.01)., Discussion: Biologics appear to be safe with no increased risk of severe form of COVID-19 in children with psoriasis. COVID-19 was responsible for the development of psoriasis or the worsening of a known psoriasis for some children., (© 2022 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Introduction: The vulnerable skin of neonates and infants is still developing anatomically and functionally and more susceptible to skin barrier disruption. The current consensus paper explores challenges in caring for neonates and infants' skin, skincare use and evaluates the role of ceramides (CERs) containing cleansers and moisturizers., Evidence Aquisition: A panel of eight clinicians who treat neonates and infants developed a consensus paper on new-born and infant skin barrier integrity and CERs-containing skincare importance. The consensus process consisted of a modified Delphi technique. The selected information from the literature searches, coupled with the panel's opinion and experience, was used to adopt statements to provide clinical data for pediatric dermatologists, dermatologists, and pediatric healthcare providers who treat neonates and infants., Evidence Synthesis: Increasingly, evidence supports skincare starting early in life, recognizing the benefits of ongoing daily use of non-alkaline cleansers and moisturizers to maintain skin barrier function. Skincare for neonates and infants should be safe, effective, and fragrance as well as sensitizing agent-free. Skincare with CERs may benefit the stratum corneum's lipid and water content., Conclusions: When applied from birth onwards, gentle cleansers and moisturizers containing barrier lipids help maintain the protective skin barrier and soothe the skin with long-term moisturizing benefits.

Competing Interests: Dr Su has been an investigator, consultant, or advisor for AbbVie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Ego, Eli Lilly, Janssen/JNJ, L'Oreal, Meda, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi. Dr Lio reports grants and personal fees from AOBiome, grants and personal fees from 10.13039/100006483AbbVie, grants and personal fees from 10.13039/100009857Regeneron/10.13039/100013995Sanofi Genzyme, personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Pierre Fabre, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from LEO pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Galderma, personal fees from L'Oreal, personal fees from Dermavant, other from Micreos, personal fees from Johnson and Johnson, personal fees from Unilever, other from Theraplex, personal fees from IntraDerm, other from Altus Labs, outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Lio has a patent Theraplex AIM pending and receives royalties. Drs Mushkin, Wollenberg, Svensson, Chernyshov, Murrell Nosbaum, Faure, and Mery have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Fragile skin is a poorly understood skin condition, particularly in the general adult population. There are currently limited epidemiological data on the prevalence of fragile skin in adults. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of perceived fragile skin across different skin types in representative samples of the general adult populations in Mexico and Russia, and to identify skin characteristics associated with perceived fragile skin., Methods: Two identical cross-sectional surveys, using a short online self-administered questionnaire, were conducted on samples of recruited individuals that were representative of the general Mexican and Russian populations. Participants responded to questions about fragile skin, with the main question being "In your opinion, do you have fragile skin (ie, skin less resistant and reacting quickly to external aggressions)?". The survey also covered questions relating to skin appearance, skin symptoms, skin disease, dermatological procedures, and living environment and climate., Results: Overall, 1,210 individuals in Mexico (N=606) and Russia (N=604) completed the online survey. Fragile skin was perceived in 50.0% and 45.9% of participants in Mexico and Russia, respectively. The principal skin appearance characteristics reported by individuals with perceived fragile skin were thin, easily wrinkled, and transparent; the main skin symptoms were dryness, redness, and/or itching (≥50% of individuals in Mexico), and dryness, tightness, and/or redness (>60% of individuals in Russia). Individuals with perceived fragile skin had experienced skin disease and/or undergone a dermatological procedure in the past 12 months, and they reported being exposed to stress (>80% of individuals in both surveys)., Conclusion: A substantial proportion of the general adult population of Mexico and Russia perceived that they had fragile skin, regardless of their skin type; fragile skin was perceived more frequently in women. These findings should assist dermatologists to extend their understanding and management of individuals with perceived fragile skin.

Forty-four patients fitted with fixed dentures made of stainless steel with TiN-based decorative coating were followed up for 2 years. Abrasion of the decorative coating at the site of the crown contact with the basis and clammers of plate dentures and at the site of cutting edges of frontal teeth was recorded in 11 (25 percent) subjects. Measurements of the electric potentials have revealed their essential increase in the patients fitted with dentures with TiN-based coating vs. those with dentures made of gold and steel.