Search

The emergence of infectious disease and antibiotic resistance in bacteria like Escherichia coli (E. coli) shows the necessity for novel computational techniques for identifying essential genes that contribute to resistance. The task of identifying resistant strains and multi-drug patterns in E. coli is a major challenge with whole genome sequencing (WGS) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. To address this issue, we suggest ARGai 1.0 a deep learning architecture enhanced with generative adversarial networks (GANs). We mitigate data scarcity difficulties by augmenting limited experimental datasets with synthetic data generated by GANs. Our in-silico method (augmentation with feature selection) improves the identification of resistance genes in E. coli by using feature extraction techniques to identify valuable features from actual and GAN-generated data. Employing comprehensive validation, we exhibit the effectiveness of our ARGai 1.0 in precisely identifying the informative and resistant genes. In addition, our ARGai 1.0 identifies the resistant strains with a classification accuracy of 98.96 % on Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network (DCGAN) augmented data. Additionally, ARGai 1.0 achieves more than 98 % of sensitivity and specificity. We also benchmark our ARGai 1.0 with several state-of-the-art AI models for resistant strain classification. In the fight against antibiotic resistance, ARGai 1.0 offers a promising avenue for computational genomics. With implications for research and clinical practice, this work shows the potential of deep networks with GAN augmentation as a practical and successful method for gene identification in E. coli., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background  Artificial intelligence chatbots have demonstrated potential to enhance clinical decision-making and streamline health care workflows, potentially alleviating administrative burdens. However, the contribution of AI chatbots to radiologic decision-making for clinical scenarios remains insufficiently explored. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of four prominent Large Language Models (LLMs)-Microsoft Bing, Claude, ChatGPT 3.5, and Perplexity-in offering clinical decision support for initial imaging for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods  Open-ended (OE) and select-all-that-apply (SATA) questions were crafted, covering four variants of case scenarios of PE in-line with the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. These questions were presented to the LLMs by three radiologists from diverse geographical regions and setups. The responses were evaluated based on established scoring criteria, with a maximum achievable score of 2 points for OE responses and 1 point for each correct answer in SATA questions. To enable comparative analysis, scores were normalized (score divided by the maximum achievable score). Result  In OE questions, Perplexity achieved the highest accuracy (0.83), while Claude had the lowest (0.58), with Bing and ChatGPT each scoring 0.75. For SATA questions, Bing led with an accuracy of 0.96, Perplexity was the lowest at 0.56, and both Claude and ChatGPT scored 0.6. Overall, OE questions saw higher scores (0.73) compared to SATA (0.68). There is poor agreement among radiologists' scores for OE (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = -0.067, p  = 0.54), while there is strong agreement for SATA (ICC = 0.875, p  < 0.001). Conclusion  The study revealed variations in accuracy across LLMs for both OE and SATA questions. Perplexity showed superior performance in OE questions, while Bing excelled in SATA questions. OE queries yielded better overall results. The current inconsistencies in LLM accuracy highlight the importance of further refinement before these tools can be reliably integrated into clinical practice, with a need for additional LLM fine-tuning and judicious selection by radiologists to achieve consistent and reliable support for decision-making., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).)

Diabetes is an enduring metabolic condition identified by heightened blood sugar levels stemming from insufficient production of insulin or ineffective utilization of insulin within the body. India is commonly labeled as the "diabetes capital of the world" owing to the widespread prevalence of this condition. To the best of the authors' last knowledge updated on September 2021, approximately 77 million adults in India were reported to be affected by diabetes, reported by the International Diabetes Federation. Owing to the concealed early symptoms, numerous diabetic patients go undiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment. While Computational Intelligence approaches have been utilized to improve the prediction rate, a significant portion of these methods lacks interpretability, primarily due to their inherent black box nature. Rule extraction is frequently utilized to elucidate the opaque nature inherent in machine learning algorithms. Moreover, to resolve the black box nature, a method for extracting strong rules based on Weighted Bayesian Association Rule Mining is used so that the extracted rules to diagnose any disease such as diabetes can be very transparent and easily analyzed by the clinical experts, enhancing the interpretability. The WBBN model is constructed utilizing the UCI machine learning repository, demonstrating a performance accuracy of 95.8%., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Kharya, Soni, Pati, Panigrahi, Giri, Qin, Mallik, Nayak and Swarnkar.)

Background: There are several antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) for the Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria that cause urinary tract infections (UTI), and it is therefore important to identify these ARG. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been used previously in the field of gene expression data, but never adopted for the detection and classification of bacterial ARG. We hypothesize, if the data is correctly conferred, right features are selected, and Deep Learning (DL) classification models are optimized, then (i) non-linear DL models would perform better than Machine Learning (ML) models, (ii) leads to higher accuracy, (iii) can identify the hub genes, and, (iv) can identify gene pathways accurately. We have therefore designed aiGeneR, the first of its kind system that uses DL-based models to identify ARG in E. coli in gene expression data., Methodology: The aiGeneR consists of a tandem connection of quality control embedded with feature extraction and AI-based classification of ARG. We adopted a cross-validation approach to evaluate the performance of aiGeneR using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Further, we analyzed the effect of sample size ensuring generalization of models and compare against the power analysis. The aiGeneR was validated scientifically and biologically for hub genes and pathways. We benchmarked aiGeneR against two linear and two other non-linear AI models., Results: The aiGeneR identifies tetM (an ARG) and showed an accuracy of 93% with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 ( p < 0.05). The mean accuracy of non-linear models was 22% higher compared to linear models. We scientifically and biologically validated the aiGeneR., Conclusions: aiGeneR successfully detected the E. coli genes validating our four hypotheses., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Background  Differential diagnosis in radiology is a critical aspect of clinical decision-making. Radiologists in the early stages may find difficulties in listing the differential diagnosis from image patterns. In this context, the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has introduced new opportunities as these models have the capacity to access and contextualize extensive information from text-based input. Objective  The objective of this study was to explore the utility of four LLMs-ChatGPT3.5, Google Bard, Microsoft Bing, and Perplexity-in providing most important differential diagnoses of cardiovascular and thoracic imaging patterns. Methods  We selected 15 unique cardiovascular ( n  = 5) and thoracic ( n  = 10) imaging patterns. We asked each model to generate top 5 most important differential diagnoses for every pattern. Concurrently, a panel of two cardiothoracic radiologists independently identified top 5 differentials for each case and came to consensus when discrepancies occurred. We checked the concordance and acceptance of LLM-generated differentials with the consensus differential diagnosis. Categorical variables were compared by binomial, chi-squared, or Fisher's exact test. Results  A total of 15 cases with five differentials generated a total of 75 items to analyze. The highest level of concordance was observed for diagnoses provided by Perplexity (66.67%), followed by ChatGPT (65.33%) and Bing (62.67%). The lowest score was for Bard with 45.33% of concordance with expert consensus. The acceptance rate was highest for Perplexity (90.67%), followed by Bing (89.33%) and ChatGPT (85.33%). The lowest acceptance rate was for Bard (69.33%). Conclusion  Four LLMs-ChatGPT3.5, Google Bard, Microsoft Bing, and Perplexity-generated differential diagnoses had high level of acceptance but relatively lower concordance. There were significant differences in acceptance and concordance among the LLMs. Hence, it is important to carefully select the suitable model for usage in patient care or in medical education., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).)