1. The 1000 Mitoses Project: A Consensus-Based International Collaborative Study on Mitotic Figures Classification.
- Author
-
Lin S, Tran C, Bandari E, Romagnoli T, Li Y, Chu M, Amirthakatesan AS, Dallmann A, Kostiukov A, Panizo A, Hodgson A, Laury AR, Polonia A, Stueck AE, Menon AA, Morini A, Özamrak B, Cooper C, Trinidad CMG, Eisenlöffel C, Suleiman DE, Suster D, Dorward DA, Aljufairi EA, Maclean F, Gul G, Sansano I, Erana-Rojas IE, Machado I, Kholova I, Karunanithi J, Gibier JB, Schulte JJ, Li JJX, Kini JR, Collins K, Galea LA, Muller L, Cima L, Nova-Camacho LM, Dabner M, Muscara MJ, Hanna MG, Agoumi M, Wiebe NJP, Oswald NK, Zahra N, Folaranmi OO, Kravtsov O, Semerci O, Patil NN, Muthusamy Sundar P, Charles P, Kumaraswamy Rajeswaran P, Zhang Q, van der Griend R, Pillappa R, Perret R, Gonzalez RS, Reed RC, Patil S, Jiang XS, Qayoom S, Prendeville S, Baskota SU, Tran TT, San TH, Kukkonen TM, Kendall TJ, Taskin T, Rutland T, Manucha V, Cockenpot V, Rosen Y, Rodriguez-Velandia YP, Ordulu Z, and Cecchini MJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Observer Variation, Pathologists statistics & numerical data, International Cooperation, Mitosis, Consensus, Neoplasms pathology, Neoplasms diagnosis
- Abstract
Introduction. The identification of mitotic figures is essential for the diagnosis, grading, and classification of various different tumors. Despite its importance, there is a paucity of literature reporting the consistency in interpreting mitotic figures among pathologists. This study leverages publicly accessible datasets and social media to recruit an international group of pathologists to score an image database of more than 1000 mitotic figures collectively. Materials and Methods. Pathologists were instructed to randomly select a digital slide from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets and annotate 10-20 mitotic figures within a 2 mm
2 area. The first 1010 submitted mitotic figures were used to create an image dataset, with each figure transformed into an individual tile at 40x magnification. The dataset was redistributed to all pathologists to review and determine whether each tile constituted a mitotic figure. Results. Overall pathologists had a median agreement rate of 80.2% (range 42.0%-95.7%). Individual mitotic figure tiles had a median agreement rate of 87.1% and a fair inter-rater agreement across all tiles (kappa = 0.284). Mitotic figures in prometaphase had lower percentage agreement rates compared to other phases of mitosis. Conclusion. This dataset stands as the largest international consensus study for mitotic figures to date and can be utilized as a training set for future studies. The agreement range reflects a spectrum of criteria that pathologists use to decide what constitutes a mitotic figure, which may have potential implications in tumor diagnostics and clinical management., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF