Search

Background: Atypical lentiginous melanocytic nevi (ALMNs) are atypical pigmented lesions with histopathological features similar to those of dysplastic nevi, with a lentiginous pattern. Variable histopathological features of ALMNs were observed in our practice., Methods: We described the histopathological features of ALMNs diagnosed in the period 2009-2015. Our cases were divided into 2 groups: Group 1: ALMNs showing the same histopathological features as previously described in the literature; Group 2: ALMNs with different features., Results: Twenty-nine ALMNs were diagnosed; 2 groups of ALMNs were identified. Group 1 ALMNs showed a constant, mild epidermal acanthosis; frequently, an inflammatory infiltrate and dermal fibrosis, cytological atypia and mild architectural atypia. Group 2 ALMNs showed a constant psoriasis-like acanthosis with a hypercellularity of the rete ridges; cytological atypia was rare, whereas architectural atypia was constantly observed. Immunohistochemistry (MART-1 staining) revealed that the melanocytes were localized at the dermo-epidermal junction in both groups. ALMNs showed a broad spectrum of histopathological features., Conclusions: Our main finding was a constant architectural atypia in all lesions of Group 2. The identification of a unique type of ALMN seems no longer possible. The correct recognition of such benign, though atypical, melanocytic lesions is important in order to avoid an overdiagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and to prevent their potential evolution to the latter.

Spitzoid neoplasms may represent a difficult diagnosis in the practice of dermatopathology. We evaluated the concordance of the fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) assay, histopathology, and dermoscopy in a group of adults and in a group of children with spitzoid neoplasms. The FISH assay, designed to detect the copy number of the RREB1 (6p25), MYB (6q23), and CCND1 (11q13) genes and of centromere 6 (Cep 6), was performed in a group of children and in a group of adults with a histopathologic diagnosis of spitzoid neoplasms. FISH data were compared with dermoscopy and histopathology. Fifteen spitzoid neoplasms were collected from 13 patients (five children and eight adults): nine lesions were histologically diagnosed as typical Spitz nevi; three lesions were melanomas and three were atypical Spitz nevi. The conventional FISH criteria were concordant with the clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of Spitz nevi in four adults and in three children. FISH criteria of the other neoplasms showed a concordance with the histopathologic diagnosis in three cases. Discordant results were obtained in five cases (two children, three adults). The FISH melanoma assay proved more reliable in spitzoid lesions found in adults than in children. This assay should be interpreted carefully in pediatric patients with Spitz nevi in the context of histological features as melanomas in the pediatric population may show distinct chromosomal aberrations., (Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Thirteen melanocytic skin neoplasms with a consultation diagnosis by A. Bernard Ackerman were submitted to immunohistochemistry for HMB-45, Ki67, cyclin D1, e-cadherin, and p16; 9/13 cases underwent fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test targeting 6p25 (RREB1), 6q23 (MYB), centromere 6 (Cep6), and 11q13 (CCND1), as well as the centromere 7 (Cep7). A "consensus diagnosis" among 3 experts was also advocated both before and after morphomolecular information. Three neoplasms with a consultation diagnosis of Spitz nevus showed at least 3 abnormal immunohistochemical patterns; 2 of these cases were also FISH-positive for CCND1 gain, but none of them had a final consensus diagnosis of melanoma. Two neoplasms with a consultation diagnosis of congenital nevus received a consensus diagnosis of melanoma. Molecular morphology techniques can highlight the atypical features of melanocytic neoplasms and support existence of a morphobiologic "spectrum": This should be mirrored in the final report by abandoning the dichotomic (benign vs malignant) diagnostic approach.

Chloracne, first described by Herxheimer in 1899, is a dermatosis consisting of more or less diffuse acneiform lesions distributed prevalently on the face and on body areas not usually affected by acne and caused by chronic or acute exposure to halogenated chemical compounds. Dioxin is the common name for dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, contaminants nearly ubiquitous in the environment and highly resistant to chemical and biological degradation. These compounds can survive for decades in the environment and accumulate in the human and animal food chains. Chloracne is characterized by the onset of numerous comedo-like lesions and yellowish cysts on the face, particularly on the cheeks, that can spread to the trunk and other body regions not usually affected by acne vulgaris, with diffuse grayish skin pigmentation and sometimes associated with hypertrichosis and areas of folliculitis. The lesions may occasionally be accompanied by skin or systemic manifestations. We report 9 cases of chloracne, 8 of them with rapid onset in patients residing in the same building, and 1 in a patient occupationally exposed to halogenated compounds. In our series, the doses of dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyls in the soil, water and plant material, and the serum titer of dioxin were within the normal range. This consideration raises the issue of the need to revise the serum threshold for dioxin poisoning and the environmental threshold. We wish also to underline the value of dermatopathology in the differential diagnosis of chloracne., (Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

We report here a new case of neutrophilic figurate erythema of infancy in a 1-year and 9-month-old white boy. Neutrophilic figurate erythema of infancy is a rare inflammatory dermatosis which is part of the figurate inflammatory dermatoses of infancy and is considered a variant of annular erythema of infancy. The disease is clinically characterized by annular erythematous lesions, sometimes with a polycyclic configuration, and histologically by a dermal neutrophilic infiltration with leukocytoclasia. Differential diagnosis mainly includes clear-cut severe diseases with a well-known etiology, such as neonatal lupus erythematosus and its variant erythema gyratum atrophicans transiens neonatale, erythema chronicum migrans and erythema marginatum rheumaticum, and diseases of unknown origin and with less clear limits, such as erythema annulare centrifugum and its variant familial annular erythema. Anamnesis, laboratory findings, clinical features, and histology allow the correct diagnosis and therefore, having excluded severe diseases, parents should be reassured as neutrophilic figurate erythema of infancy, as the annular erythema of infancy, is a benign disease, in most cases unassociated with other conditions and usually self-limiting over a few months, even though a chronic course may rarely occur. Our case was characterized by a chronic persistent course and by a complete resolution of the lesions only during febrile episodes.

Background: Ulcerous rectocolitis and Crohn's disease are the best known forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Skin manifestations are not uncommon in IBD and may be divided into specific cutaneous signs, aspecific cutaneous signs, and cutaneous signs caused by drugs used for IBD therapy. The specific signs (fistulas, rhagades and ulcers) are the result of the diffusion of the intestinal inflammatory process into the skin. Aspecific cutaneous signs (stomatic aphthosis, erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, Sweet's syndrome, vasculitis, bullous diseases) are quite frequently found in those suffering from IBD, but also in apparently healthy subjects, and may sometimes be the first sign of the intestinal disease. Cutaneous manifestations due to drugs vary in clinical aspect and are the direct consequence of the therapies adopted, which in IBD patients can be quite numerous: steroids, immunosuppressants, 5-aminosalicylic acid, biological agents, antibiotics., Objective and Methods: Due to the frequent finding of cutaneous manifestations in patients affected by IBD, a collaboration was set up between the Dermatological Clinic of the University of Bologna and the Center for the Study of IBD of the same university hospital. The aim was to diagnose the cutaneous signs appearing during IBD and to establish their etiopathogenesis in order to assess whether they were the result of epiphenomena of the IBD or side effects of the therapies adopted., Results: The cutaneous manifestations we observed can be divided into three distinct groups: signs that were specific to the basic disease, aspecific signs and finally signs attributable to the drugs used for therapy. Particular attention was given to the aspecific signs and those consequential to therapy. The aspecific cutaneous signs seen in our clinic generally reflect those reported in the literature. The cutaneous manifestations due to drugs were further divided into three groups: rosacea, acneiform dermatitis and psoriasis-like dermatitis. The most notable aspect of our series is the high number of patients presenting psoriasiform-type dermatitides with a generally widespread diffusion., Conclusion: We would like to draw attention to the fact that all patients with psoriasis had been undergoing treatment with drugs inhibiting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) as part of IBD therapy. In all cases, the cutaneous reaction started after the third or fourth infusion of the biological drug. Anti-TNF-alpha agents have also been successfully used to treat psoriasis in the last few years. The reason for this apparently paradoxical effect of the therapy is still unclear., (2007 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Leishmaniasis is emerging as a common and serious opportunistic disease for patients with HIV infection. Almost all cases of HIV-Leishmania coinfection have been described in Mediterranean countries and they occur with various clinical presentations, ranging from typical visceral forms to asymptomatic or atypical cases, including cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Pentavalent antimony compounds have been the mainstays of antileishmanial therapy for half a century and new lipid formulations of amphotericin B seem reliable, but the most effective treatment remains unknown. We describe a patient who was HIV infected and an intravenous drug user, with an unusual disseminated cutaneous leishmaniasis, after an initial visceral disease and after a 13-month maintenance treatment with liposomal amphotericin. The severe concurrent immunosuppression probably played an essential role in leading to this atypical cutaneous form, characterized by diffuse, nonulcerated, nonscabby maculopapular lesions.

Although HIV infection is often associated with several rheumatic diseases, the coexistence of this retroviral infection and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is extremely uncommon. Generally, HIV-related immunosuppression improves SLE symptoms, and antiretroviral therapy may lead to an autoimmune disease flare subsequent to the increase of circulating CD4+ cell number. Two HIV-infected female patients with SLE and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) diagnosed a few months after the highly active antiretroviral therapy initiation, are described. To our knowledge, this is the second case of DLE and the twenty-seventh case of SLE reported to date in association with HIV infection.