Search

The use of rapid disk diffusion or modified automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) system approaches demonstrates excellent performance for gram-negative organisms directly from blood cultures. In a recent study, S. Khan, A. Das, A. Mishra, A. Vidyarthi, et al. (Microbiol Spectr 12:e03081-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03081-23) compared the performance of three direct-from-blood AST methods against standard of care disk diffusion and automated AST. The results demonstrated high categorical agreements and low error rates across three protocols. The study suggests that locally validated direct-from-blood AST protocols offer reliable and fast results, particularly for resource-limited settings. However, local context and workflows should be considered prior to implementing rapid AST protocols, and more research is needed on the performance of rapid AST protocols for gram-positive organisms., Competing Interests: Andrea Prinzi is a paid employee of bioMerieux (Field Medical Director, US Medical Affairs).

The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance landscape in the United States consists of a data flow that starts in the clinical setting and is maintained by a network of national and state public health laboratories. These organizations are well established, with robust methodologies to test and confirm antimicrobial susceptibility. Still, the bridge that guides the flow of data is often one directional and caught in a constant state of rush hour that can only be refined with improvements to infrastructure and automation in the data flow. Moreover, there is an absence of information in the literature explaining the processes clinical laboratories use to coalesce and share susceptibility test data for AMR surveillance, further complicated by variability in testing procedures. This knowledge gap limits our understanding of what is needed to improve and streamline data sharing from clinical to public health laboratories. Successful models of AMR surveillance display attributes like 2-way communication between clinical and public health laboratories, centralized databases, standardized data, and the use of electronic health records or data systems, highlighting areas of opportunity and improvement. This article explores the roles and processes of the organizations involved in AMR surveillance in the United States and identifies current knowledge gaps and opportunities to improve communication between them through standardization, communication, and modernization of data flow., Competing Interests: A.M.P, D.W.R., and B.R.R. report that they are paid employees of bioMérieux (Salt Lake City, Utah). A.J.S has no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

The advent of rapid molecular microbiology testing has revolutionized infectious disease diagnostics and is now impacting pneumonia diagnosis and management. Molecular platforms offer highly multiplexed assays for diverse viral and bacterial detection, alongside antimicrobial resistance markers, providing the potential to significantly shape patient care. Despite the superiority in sensitivity and speed, debates continue regarding the clinical role of multiplex molecular testing, notably in comparison to standard methods and distinguishing colonization from infection. Recent guidelines endorse molecular pneumonia panels for enhanced sensitivity and rapidity, but implementation requires addressing methodological differences and ensuring clinical relevance. Diagnostic stewardship should be leveraged to optimize pneumonia testing, emphasizing pre- and post-analytical strategies. Collaboration between clinical microbiologists and bedside providers is essential in developing implementation strategies to maximize the clinical utility of multiplex molecular diagnostics in pneumonia. This narrative review explores these multifaceted issues, examining the current evidence on the clinical performance of multiplex molecular assays in pneumonia, and reflects on lessons learned from previous microbiological advances. Additionally, given the complexity of pneumonia and the sensitivity of molecular diagnostics, diagnostic stewardship is discussed within the context of current literature, including implementation strategies that consider pre-analytical and post-analytical modifications to optimize the clinical utility of advanced technologies like multiplex PCR.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to serve as a major global health crisis. Clinicians practising in this modern era are faced with ongoing challenges in the therapeutic management of patients suffering from antimicrobial-resistant infections. A strong educational understanding and synergistic application of clinical microbiology, infectious disease and pharmacological concepts can assist the adventuring clinician in the navigation of such cases. Important items include mobilizing laboratory testing for pathogen identification and susceptibility data, harnessing an understanding of intrinsic pathogen resistance, acknowledging epidemiological resistance trends, recognizing acquired AMR mechanisms, and consolidating these considerations when constructing an ideal pharmacological plan. In this article, we outline a novel framework by which to systematically approach clinical AMR, encourage AMR-related education and optimize therapeutic decision-making in AMR-related illnesses., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

The process of bacterial nomenclature change has evolved in complexity over time and continues to be an iterative process that is not without challenges. The importance and feasibility of such changes vary among basic researchers, clinical microbiologists, and clinicians. In recent years, clinically relevant changes have been made across Gram-positive and Gram-negative organism groups, as well as the mycobacteria. Updated clinical laboratory accreditation requirements state that clinical laboratories must update their reporting practices in the case of clinically relevant nomenclature changes. These updates may significantly affect various sectors of health care, including antimicrobial stewardship, laboratory protocols, and infection prevention procedures and policies. While regularly updating bacterial nomenclature aims to improve the accuracy and consistency of our microbial language, the potential impact of such changes must be considered., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. A. M. P. is a paid employee of BioMérieux. N. M. M. reports no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Competing Interests: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Endotracheal aspirate cultures (EACs) help diagnose lower respiratory tract infections in mechanically ventilated patients but are limited by contamination with normal microbiota and variation in laboratory reporting. Increased use of EACs is associated with increased antimicrobial prescribing, but the impact of microbiology reporting on prescribing practices is unclear. This study was a retrospective analysis of EACs from mechanically ventilated patients at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) admitted between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019. Chart review was performed to collect all culture and Gram stain components, as well as antibiotic use directed to organisms in culture. Reporting concordance was determined for each organism using American Society for Microbiology guidelines. Days of therapy were calculated for overreported and guideline-concordant organisms. A multivariable model was used to assess the relationship between organism reporting and total days of therapy. Overall, 448 patients with 827 EACs were included in this study. Among patients with tracheostomy, 25 (8%) organisms reported from EACs were overreported and contributed 48 days of excess therapy, while 227 (29%) organisms from the EACs of endotracheally intubated patients were overreported, contributing 472 excess days of therapy. After adjustment, organism overreporting was associated with a >2-fold-higher rate of antimicrobial therapy than guideline-concordant reporting (incident rate ratio [IRR], 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23, 6.53; P < 0.05). Overreported organisms from respiratory cultures contribute to excess antimicrobial therapy exposure in mechanically ventilated patients. Microbiology laboratories have an opportunity to mitigate antimicrobial overuse through standardized reporting practices.

Diagnostic stewardship aims to deliver the right test to the right patient at the right time and is optimally combined with antimicrobial stewardship to allow for the right interpretation to translate into the right antimicrobial at the right time. Laboratorians, physicians, pharmacists, and other healthcare providers have an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of diagnostics through collaborative activities around pre-analytical and post-analytical periods of diagnostic testing. Additionally, special considerations should be given to measuring the effectiveness of diagnostics over time. Herein, we perform a narrative review of the literature on these potential optimization opportunities and the temporal factors that can yield changes in diagnostic effectiveness. Our objective is to inform on these considerations to ensure enhanced value through improved implementation and measurement of effectiveness for local stakeholder metrics and/or clinical outcomes research.

In the absence of evidence-based laboratory guidelines, the workup and interpretation of tracheal aspirate (TA) cultures remains controversial and confusing within the fields of clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. Between 22 January and 24 February 2020, we conducted a national, web-based survey of microbiology laboratory personnel in free-standing pediatric hospitals and adult hospitals containing pediatric facilities regarding the laboratory practices used for TA specimens. We hypothesized there would be substantial center-level variability in laboratory processing of TA cultures. The response rate for the survey was 48% (73/153). There was a high level of variability in the criteria used for all processes, including specimen receipt, Gram staining, and culture reporting. Most respondents (77%) reported they do not reject TA specimens based on Gram stain criteria, and 44% of labs do not require that a minimum number of Gram stain fields be reviewed prior to reporting results. Overall, nonacademic hospital laboratories and pediatric-only laboratories are more likely to identify, report, and perform susceptibility testing on organisms from TA cultures, regardless of organism quantity or predominance. There is a substantial amount of process variability among pediatric microbiology laboratories that affects TA culture reporting, and which guides treatment decisions. This variation within and among labs makes clinical outcome studies related to TA cultures difficult to interpret. This study serves as a pragmatic step in informing the development of robust clinical guidelines. Clinical outcome and implementation studies are necessary to determine the effectiveness of guidelines for TA cultures., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.)

The FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel was validated for nonblood sterile site specimens with clinical impact of rapid identification compared to conventional diagnostics. The panel accurately identified target organisms from 98% of positive broth cultures a median 1.1 day faster than conventional techniques (P < 0.0001) with potential clinical impact in 22% of cases., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)