Search

Purpose: To assess the methodological quality of all relevant and recent European clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancers, and to synthesise their recommendations on the use of chemotherapy., Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, guidelines repositories, and other sources from 2010 onwards. We appraised quality using AGREE-II and AGREE-REX., Results: 11 CPGs were included (five high, five low, and one moderate quality). Most guidelines showed deficiencies in the domain "applicability", with only three scoring above 60%. Nine did not report having sought the views and preferences of the target population. The lowest scores for AGREE-REX were item Values and Preferences of Target Users (1.6; SD 1.3), and item Values and Preferences of Policy/Decision-Makers (1.8; SD 1.7). The domain Clinical Applicability got the highest score and the domain Implementability got the lowest., Conclusions: An urgent area of research is how to develop credible and implementable recommendations on the clinical use of CT for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021236753)., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) compared with continuous androgen deprivation therapy (CADT) for men with prostate cancer (PCA)., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ECONLIT, from the database inception to December 2017. We adhered to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to assess the quality of the evidence and to formulate recommendations., Results: We included one systematic review with 15 trials as well as three additional studies that assessed IADT versus CADT, all of them focused on PCA patients in advanced stages. The findings did not show differences for critical and important outcomes, including adverse events. Trials reported the benefits of IADT in terms of selected domains of health-related quality of life, although with high heterogeneity. Evidence quality was considered moderate or low for most of the assessed outcomes. We identified a patient preference study reporting a high preference for IADT, due to issues related to quality of life, general well-being, and side effects, among others. We did not identify economic studies comparing these regimes. We formulate four recommendations: one no-recommendation, one conditional recommendation, and two good practice points., Conclusion: For men in early stages of PCA, it is not possible to make any recommendation about the preferable use of IADT or CADT due to the lack of available evidence. For men in advanced stages of the disease, an IADT should be considered as soon as clinically reasonable (weak recommendation and low certainty of the evidence). Clinicians should discuss the risks and benefits of IADT and CADT with their patients, taking into account their values and preferences., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Objective: To describe the development of a novel on-line database aimed to serve as a source of information concerning healthcare interventions appraised for their clinical value and appropriateness by several initiatives worldwide, and to present a retrospective analysis of the appraisals already included in the database., Methods and Findings: Database development and a retrospective analysis. The database DianaHealth.com is already on-line and it is regularly updated, independent, open access and available in English and Spanish. Initiatives are identified in medical news, in article references, and by contacting experts in the field. We include appraisals in the form of clinical recommendations, expert analyses, conclusions from systematic reviews, and original research that label any health care intervention as low-value or inappropriate. We obtain the information necessary to classify the appraisals according to type of intervention, specialties involved, publication year, authoring initiative, and key words. The database is accessible through a search engine which retrieves a list of appraisals and a link to the website where they were published. DianaHealth.com also provides a brief description of the initiatives and a section where users can report new appraisals or suggest new initiatives. From January 2014 to July 2015, the on-line database included 2940 appraisals from 22 initiatives: eleven campaigns gathering clinical recommendations from scientific societies, five sets of conclusions from literature review, three sets of recommendations from guidelines, two collections of articles on low clinical value in medical journals, and an initiative of our own., Conclusions: We have developed an open access on-line database of appraisals about healthcare interventions considered of low clinical value or inappropriate. DianaHealth.com could help physicians and other stakeholders make better decisions concerning patient care and healthcare systems sustainability. Future efforts should be focused on assessing the impact of these appraisals in the clinical practice.

Objective: To analyze phenotypic classification and other risk factors for interval breast cancer, focusing on true interval and false negative cancers., Methods: A nested case-control study was performed among 115 cancers detected between two screening mammograms (interval cancers) and 115 screen-detected cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2008 in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Barcelona (Spain). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare patient and tumor molecular characteristics among all interval cancers, true intervals and false negatives, and screen-detected cancers., Results: A total of 42.5% of interval cancers were true interval tumors and 16.2% were false negatives. High breast density and triple negative phenotype were more frequent in true interval cancers than in screen-detected cancers (57.6 and 34.1%, respectively for breast density, p = 0.023; 28.1 and 7.5%, respectively for triple negative phenotype, p = 0.028), while no statistically significant differences were observed between false negatives and screen-detected cancers. The main adjusted factors associated with true interval cancers compared with screen-detected cancers were high breast density and triple negative phenotype (OR = 3.1, 95% CI, 1.03-9.24 and OR = 8.9, 95% CI, 2.03-38.62, respectively)., Conclusion: A more aggressive molecular phenotype and high breast density were identified in breast tumors that truly arise in the interval between screenings.

Objective: To compare sensitivity an effectiveness of ThinPrep vs. Pap Test and determine whether the Hybrid Capture System II (HCII) for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) could increase the sensitivity and effectiveness of cervical screening in a low risk population., Study Design: We present a comparative observer, blind, "split sample" study of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou staining in a population of 2026 consecutive women., Results: Conventional Papanicolaou stain detected lesions in 62 cases (3.06%), including 1 atypical glandular cell of undetermined significance (AGUS), 34 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (1.73% of atypias), 20 (0.99%) low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 7 (0.35%) high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). ThinPrep detected lesions in 63 cases (3.11%), including 26 (1.28%) ASCUS, 27 (1.33%) LSIL and 10 (0.49%) HSIL. Despite this overall similarity, only 35 had a coincident cytopathologic result by both methods. The kappa concordance index between ThinPrep and Pap was 0.546. Sensitivity and specificity were 74.6 and 45.0 in ThinPrep and 69.5 and 25.0 in Papanicolaou-stained smears. High risk HPV (HR-HP 17) was positive in 13 of ZOASCUS and in 21 of 22 SIL., Conclusion: Technologies now widely available such as Thin Prep and viral detection aim to improve accuracy of screening.

Incidence rates of oral and oropharyngeal cancers (oral cancer) in Spain are among the highest in Europe. Spain has a population heavily exposed to various types of tobacco and alcoholic beverages but the role and impact of tobacco type and beverage type in oral carcinogenesis remain controversial. To estimate the independent and joint effects of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking habits on the risk of developing oral cancer, we carried out a multicenter, hospital-based, case-control study in Spain. Data from 375 patients newly diagnosed with cancer of the oral cavity or oropharynx and 375 matched control subjects were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression procedures. All exposure characteristics of amount, duration and cessation of both tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking were strongly associated with cancer risk following a dose-dependent relationship. At equal intake or duration levels, black-tobacco smoking and drinking of spirits were both associated with a 2- to 4-fold increase in cancer risk compared to blond tobacco smoking or drinking of wine or beer, respectively. While ever exposure to smoking only or drinking only was associated with a moderate and nonsignificant increase in cancer risk, a history of simultaneous exposure to both habits was associated with a 13-fold increase that was compatible with a synergistic effect model (p-value for interaction: 0.008). Exposure to black tobacco smoking and/or drinking of spirits may account for up to 77% of oral cancer occurrence in Spain. Both black tobacco smoking and drinking of spirits place individuals at a very high risk of developing oral cancer. Simultaneous exposure to tobacco and alcohol consumption increases oral cancer risk in a synergistic fashion, even when consumption levels are moderate. These results underline the importance of type of tobacco and alcohol concentration in oral carcinogenesis., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)