1. Compliance with Early Long-Term Prophylaxis Guidelines for Severe Hemophilia A.
- Author
-
Saultier P, Guillaume Y, Demiguel V, Berger C, Borel-Derlon A, Claeyssens S, Harroche A, Oudot C, Rafowicz A, Trossaert M, Wibaut B, Vinciguerra C, Boucekine M, Baumstarck K, Meunier S, Calvez T, and Chambost H
- Subjects
- Blood Coagulation Factors therapeutic use, Child, Preschool, Drug Administration Schedule, France, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Joint Diseases etiology, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Logistic Models, Male, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Physicians' standards, Severity of Illness Index, Blood Coagulation Factors administration & dosage, Guideline Adherence statistics & numerical data, Hemophilia A complications, Joint Diseases prevention & control, Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the applicability and compliance with guidelines for early initiation of long-term prophylaxis in infants with severe hemophilia A and to identify factors associated with guideline compliance., Study Design: This real-world, prospective, multicenter, population-based FranceCoag study included almost all French boys with severe hemophilia A, born between 2000 and 2009 (ie, after guideline implementation)., Results: We included 333 boys in the study cohort. The cumulative incidence of long-term prophylaxis use was 61.2% at 3 years of age vs 9.5% in a historical cohort of 39 boys born in 1996 (ie, before guideline implementation). The guidelines were not applicable in 23.1% of patients due to an early intracranial bleeding or inhibitor development. Long-term prophylaxis was delayed in 10.8% of patients. In the multivariate analysis, 2 variables were significantly associated with "timely long-term prophylaxis" as compared with "delayed long-term prophylaxis": hemophilia treating center location in the southern regions of France (OR 23.6, 95% CI 1.9-286.7, P = .013 vs Paris area) and older age at long-term prophylaxis indication (OR 7.2 for each additional year, 95% CI 1.2-43.2, P = .031). Long-term prophylaxis anticipation was observed in 39.0% of patients. Earlier birth year (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, P = .010 for birth years 2005-2009 vs 2000-2004) and age at first factor replacement (OR 1.9 for each additional year, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, P = .005) were significantly associated with "long-term prophylaxis guideline compliance" vs "long-term prophylaxis anticipation.", Conclusions: This study suggests that long-term prophylaxis guidelines are associated with increased long-term prophylaxis use. However, early initiation of long-term prophylaxis remains a challenge., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF