Search

This phase 2 study investigated pevonedistat + azacitidine + venetoclax ( n  = 83) versus azacitidine + venetoclax ( n  = 81) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The study was stopped early following negative results from PANTHER, which evaluated pevonedistat in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or low-blast AML. Outcomes were analyzed up to the datacut. For pevonedistat + azacitidine + venetoclax versus azacitidine + venetoclax, the median follow-up was 8.44 versus 7.95 months; the complete remission (CR) rate was 45% versus 49%; composite CR (CCR; CR+CR with incomplete blood count recovery) was 77% versus 72%. There were no differences in event-free survival (primary endpoint; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.60; p  = 0.477) or overall survival (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.82-2.49; p  = 0.896). In exploratory analyses in IDH -mutated AML, CCR rates were higher with pevonedistat + azacitidine + venetoclax versus azacitidine + venetoclax. Safety was similar between treatment arms. Efficacy/safety with azacitidine + venetoclax was consistent with the phase 3 VIALE-A study., Trial Registration: NCT04266795.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) prevents acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relapses following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the life-threatening toxicities such as graft versus host disease (GVHD), the identification of variables associated with response without toxicities is warranted. We hypothesized that HLA evolutionary divergence (HED), defined by the diversity between two given alleles of the same HLA gene, may be such a factor. A retrospective multicenter case-control study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of pre-emptive (preDLI) and prophylactic DLI (proDLI) regarding their HED score, in AML or MDS patients. DLI-treated patients were matched with controls (1:2 matched) from French transplantation centers according to hospital, hemopathy, donor type, and risk classification. In total, 201 patients were included ( N  = 147 in the preDLI group, N  = 54 in the proDLI group). Relapse-free survival was significantly better in the preDLI group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.55, p  < 0.001) than in controls. However, this benefit was offset by a higher incidence of severe GVHD (HR = 4.88, 95% CI: 2.30-10.32, p  < 0.001). HED A, B, C, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1, and DRB1 were calculated for 65 DLI-treated patients. High-class II HED was significantly associated with higher GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS, HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20-0.77, p  = 0.005). Specific DQAB associations directly improved GRFS (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.58, p  = 0.004). In conclusion, screening the class II HED score identifies patients eligible for DLI treatment who will benefit the most from this strategy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2025 The Author(s). HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Hematology Association.)

Patients with Core-Binding Factor (CBF) and NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be monitored by quantitative PCR after having achieved first complete remission (CR) to detect morphologic relapse and drive preemptive therapy. How to best manage these patients is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 303 patients with CBF and NPM1-mutated AML, aged 18-60 years, without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first CR, with molecular monitoring after first-line intensive therapy. Among these patients, 153 (51%) never relapsed, 95 (31%) had molecular relapse (53 received preemptive therapy and 42 progressed to morphologic relapse at salvage therapy), and 55 (18%) had upfront morphologic relapse. Patients who received preemptive therapy had higher OS than those who received salvage therapy after having progressed from molecular to morphologic relapse and those with upfront morphologic relapse (three-year OS: 78% vs. 51% vs. 51%, respectively, P = 0.01). Preemptive therapy included upfront allogeneic HCT (n = 19), intensive chemotherapy (n = 21), and non-intensive therapy (n = 13; three-year OS: 92% vs. 79% vs. 58%, respectively, P = 0.09). Although not definitive due to the non-randomized allocation of patients to different treatment strategies at relapse, our study suggests that molecular monitoring should be considered during follow-up to start preemptive therapy before overt morphologic relapse., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration., Methods: SIMPLIFY-2 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 trial of momelotinib versus best available therapy (BAT; 88.5% continued ruxolitinib) in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis (n = 156). Patient subgroups (n = 105 each) were defined by either baseline (1) hemoglobin (Hb) of < 100 g/L or (2) non-transfusion independence (not meeting the criteria of no transfusions and no Hb of < 80 g/L for the previous 12 weeks); outcomes have been summarized descriptively., Results: In both subgroups of interest, week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher with momelotinib versus BAT/ruxolitinib: baseline Hb of < 100 g/L, 22 (33.3%) versus 5 (12.8%); baseline non-transfusion independent, 25 (34.7%) versus 1 (3.0%). Mean Hb levels over time were also generally higher in both subgroups with momelotinib, despite median transfusion rates through week 24 with momelotinib being comparable to or lower than with BAT/ruxolitinib. Spleen and symptom response rates with momelotinib in these subgroups were comparable to the intent-to-treat population, while rates with BAT/ruxolitinib were lower., Conclusion: In patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and/or in need of RBC transfusions, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using anemia supportive therapies., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02101268., (© 2024. Crown.)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a challenging hematological malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Leukemic stem cells (LSCs) contribute to therapeutic failure, relapse, and adverse outcome. This study investigates the role of quiescence and related molecular mechanisms in AML pathogenesis and LSC functions to identify potential therapeutic targets. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the LSC-enriched quiescent cell population has a distinct gene signature with prognostic relevance in patients with AML. Mechanistically, quiescent blasts exhibit increased autophagic activity, which contributes to their sustained viability. Proteomic profiling uncovered differential requirements for iron metabolism between quiescent and cycling cells, revealing a unique dependence of quiescent cells on ferritinophagy, a selective form of autophagy mediated by nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4), which regulates iron bioavailability. We evaluated the therapeutic potential of inhibiting NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy using genetic knockdown and chemical inhibition approaches. In vitro assays showed that suppression of NCOA4 was toxic to leukemic blasts, particularly the CD34 + CD38 - LSC-enriched population, without affecting normal CD34 + hematopoietic progenitors. In vivo studies using murine patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of AML confirmed that NCOA4 inhibition reduced tumor burden and impaired LSC viability and self-renewal, indicating a specific vulnerability of these cells to ferritinophagy disruption. Our findings underscore the role of NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy in maintaining LSC quiescence and function and suggest that targeting this pathway may be an effective therapeutic strategy for AML. This study highlights the potential of NCOA4 inhibition to improve AML outcomes and paves the way for future research and clinical development.

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

CPX-351, a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a 1:5 molar ratio, is approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. In a pivotal phase III trial, CPX-351 significantly improved overall survival compared with standard-of-care 7 + 3 chemotherapy (7 days cytarabine; 3 days daunorubicin) in adults aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML (median = 9.56 months vs. 5.95 months; hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval = 0.52-0.90; p = 0.003). Approximately 30% of patients with newly diagnosed AML have mutations in the FLT3 gene, which may be associated with poor outcomes. Here, we review the current in vitro , clinical, and real-world evidence on the use of CPX-351 in patients with AML and mutations in FLT3 . Additionally, we review preliminary data from clinical trials and patient case reports that suggest the combination of CPX-351 with FLT3 inhibitors may represent another treatment option for patients with FLT3 mutation-positive AML., Competing Interests: CA has participated in advisory board meetings for Jazz Pharmaceuticals and AOP Orphan and has received an honorarium from Incyte. VP has received speaker and consultancy fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. CR has received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, IQVIA, and MaaT Pharma; has received personal fees from AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, and Takeda; and has received nonfinancial support from AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Servier., (Copyright © 2023 Andrews, Pullarkat and Recher.)

Cusatuzumab is a high-affinity, anti-CD70 monoclonal antibody under investigation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This two-part, open-label, multicenter, phase I/II trial evaluated cusatuzumab plus azacitidine in patients with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Patients received a single dose of cusatuzumab at one of four dose levels (1, 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg) 14 days before starting combination therapy. In phase I dose escalation, cusatuzumab was then administered on days 3 and 17, in combination with azacitidine (75 mg/m2) on days 1-7, every 28 days. The primary objective in phase I was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of cusatuzumab plus azacitidine. The primary objective in phase II was efficacy at the RP2D (selected as 10 mg/kg). Thirty-eight patients were enrolled: 12 in phase I (three per dose level; four with European LeukemiaNet 2017 adverse risk) and 26 in phase II (21 with adverse risk). An objective response (≥partial remission) was achieved by 19/38 patients (including 8/26 in phase II); 14/38 achieved complete remission. Eleven patients (37.9%) achieved an objective response among the 29 patients in phase I and phase II treated at the RP2D. At a median follow-up of 10.9 months, median duration of first response was 4.5 months and median overall survival was 11.5 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infections (84.2%) and hematologic toxicities (78.9%). Seven patients (18.4%) reported infusion-related reactions, including two with grade 3 events. Thus, cusatuzumab/azacitidine appears generally well tolerated and shows preliminary efficacy in this setting. Investigation of cusatuzumab combined with current standard-of-care therapy, comprising venetoclax and azacitidine, is ongoing.

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as safety outcomes in patients who received post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy. ADMIRAL was a global phase 3 randomized controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML. Patients with R/R AML who harbored FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in the juxtamembrane domain or D835/I836 point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain were randomized (2:1) to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or to preselected high- or low-intensity salvage chemotherapy (1 or 2 cycles). Patients in the gilteritinib arm who proceeded to HSCT could receive post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy if they were within 30 to 90 days post-transplantation and had achieved composite complete remission (CRc) with successful engraftment and no post-transplantation complications. Adverse events (AEs) during HSCT were recorded in the gilteritinib arm only. Survival outcomes and the cumulative incidence of relapse were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT during the trial. Treatment-emergent AEs were evaluated in patients who restarted gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Patients in the gilteritinib arm underwent HSCT more frequently than those in the chemotherapy arm (26% [n = 64] versus 15% [n = 19]). For all transplantation recipients, 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Despite a trend toward longer OS after pretransplantation CRc, post-transplantation survival was comparable in the 2 arms. Patients who resumed gilteritinib after HSCT had a low relapse rate after pretransplantation CRc (20%) or CR (0%). The most common AEs observed with post-transplantation gilteritinib therapy were increased alanine aminotransferase level (45%), pyrexia (43%), and diarrhea (40%); grade ≥3 AEs were related primarily to myelosuppression. The incidences of grade ≥III acute graft-versus-host disease and related mortality were low. Post-transplantation survival was similar across the 2 study arms in the ADMIRAL trial, but higher remission rates with gilteritinib facilitated receipt of HSCT. Gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy had a stable safety and tolerability profile and was associated with low relapse rates. Taken together, these data support a preference for bridging therapy with gilteritinib over chemotherapy in transplantation-eligible patients., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and safety of venetoclax + azacitidine in treatment-naïve patients with acute myeloid leukemia harboring poor-risk cytogenetics and TP53mut or TP53wt., Patients and Methods: We analyzed data from a phase III study (NCT02993523) comparing venetoclax (400 mg orally days 1-28) + azacitidine (75 mg/m2 days 1-7) or placebo + azacitidine, and from a phase Ib study (NCT02203773) of venetoclax + azacitidine. Patients were ineligible for intensive therapy. TP53 status was analyzed centrally; cytogenetic studies were performed locally., Results: Patients (n = 127) with poor-risk cytogenetics receiving venetoclax + azacitidine (TP53wt = 50; TP53mut = 54) were compared with patients with poor-risk cytogenetics (n = 56) receiving azacitidine alone (TP53wt = 22; TP53mut = 18).For poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53wt patients, venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine alone resulted in composite remission rates (CRc) of 70% versus 23%, median duration of remission (DoR) of 18.4 versus 8.5 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 23.4 versus 11.3 months, respectively. Outcomes with venetoclax + azacitidine were comparable with similarly treated patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and TP53wt.For poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53mut patients, venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine alone resulted in CRc of 41% versus 17%, median DoR of 6.5 versus 6.7 months, and median OS of 5.2 versus 4.9 months, respectively.For poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53mut patients, predominant grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) for venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine were febrile neutropenia (55%/39%), thrombocytopenia (28%/28%), neutropenia (26%/17%), anemia (13%/6%), and pneumonia (28%/33%). AEs were comparable between TP53mut and TP53wt patients., Conclusions: In poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53mut patients, venetoclax + azacitidine improved remission rates but not DoR or OS compared with azacitidine alone. However, in poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53wt patients, venetoclax + azacitidine resulted in higher remission rates and longer DoR and OS than azacitidine alone, with outcomes comparable with similarly treated patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Toxicities were similar in TP53mut and TP53wt patients. See related commentary by Green and Zeidner, p. 5235., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may extend to extra-medullary sites at diagnosis or at relapse, either isolated or associated with bone marrow disease. Granulocytic sarcoma of uterine cervix is rare, and there is no established treatment for this disease. Two cases of uterine cervix-limited AML relapse showed that brachytherapy may be an effective therapeutic option in this setting along with chemotherapy, with good tolerance., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Termedia.)

Resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs is a major cause of treatment failure in acute myeloid leukemias (AML). To better characterize the mechanisms of chemoresistance, we first identified genes whose expression is dysregulated in AML cells resistant to daunorubicin or cytarabine, the main drugs used for induction therapy. The genes found to be activated are mostly linked to immune signaling and inflammation. Among them, we identified a strong upregulation of the NOX2 NAPDH oxidase subunit genes (CYBB, CYBA, NCF1, NCF2, NCF4 and RAC2). The ensuing increase in NADPH oxidase expression and production of reactive oxygen species, which is particularly strong in daunorubicin-resistant cells, participates in the acquisition and/or maintenance of resistance to daunorubicin. Gp91phox (CYBB-encoded Nox2 catalytic subunit), was found to be more expressed and active in leukemic cells from patients with the French-American-British (FAB) M4/M5 subtypes of AML than in those from patients with the FAB M0-M2 ones. Moreover, its expression was increased at the surface of patients' chemotherapy-resistant AML cells. Finally, using a gene expression based score we demonstrated that high expression of NOX2 subunit genes is a marker of adverse prognosis in AML patients. The prognostic NOX score we defined is independent of the cytogenetic-based risk classification, FAB subtype, FLT3/NPM1 mutational status and age.

DDX41 germline mutations (DDX41MutGL) are the most common genetic predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent reports suggest that DDX41MutGL myeloid malignancies could be considered as a distinct entity, even if their specific presentation and outcome remain to be defined. We describe here the clinical and biological features of 191 patients with DDX41MutGL AML. Baseline characteristics and outcome of 86 of these patients, treated with intensive chemotherapy in 5 prospective Acute Leukemia French Association/French Innovative Leukemia Organization trials, were compared with those of 1604 patients with DDX41 wild-type (DDX41WT) AML, representing a prevalence of 5%. Patients with DDX41MutGL AML were mostly male (75%), in their seventh decade, and with low leukocyte count (median, 2 × 109/L), low bone marrow blast infiltration (median, 33%), normal cytogenetics (75%), and few additional somatic mutations (median, 2). A second somatic DDX41 mutation (DDX41MutSom) was found in 82% of patients, and clonal architecture inference suggested that it could be the main driver for AML progression. DDX41MutGL patients displayed higher complete remission rates (94% vs 69%; P < .0001) and longer restricted mean overall survival censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) than 2017 European LeukemiaNet intermediate/adverse (Int/Adv) DDX41WT patients (5-year difference in restricted mean survival times, 13.6 months; P < .001). Relapse rates censored at HSCT were lower at 1 year in DDX41MutGL patients (15% vs 44%) but later increased to be similar to Int/Adv DDX41WT patients at 3 years (82% vs 75%). HSCT in first complete remission was associated with prolonged relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.88; P = .02) but not with longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.68; P = .5)., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

In order to improve the outcome observed with azacitidine (AZA) in higher-risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), its combination with other drugs in MDS must be evaluated. So far, no combination has not been shown to be more effective than AZA alone. AZA-PLUS was a phase II trial that, in a "pick a winner" approach, randomly assigned patients with higher-risk MDS, CMML and low blast count AML to: AZA; AZA plus lenalidomide; AZA plus Valproic Acid or AZA plus Idarubicin. 322 patients were included. After six cycles, 69 (21.4%) CR + PR were observed with no benefit from any combination. Median EFS and OS were 17.2 and 19.7 months in the whole cohort, respectively, with no difference across randomised arms. Infection and rates of hospitalisation during the first six cycles were higher in the AZA-LEN And AZA-IDA arm, related to increased myelosuppression. Factors associated with better response were IPSS, favourable or intermediate karyotype, haemoglobin, lower circulating blast count, fibrinogen level and lower LDH, while poorer survival was seen in therapy-related MDS and, in the case of TP53, PTPN11 or CSF3R mutation. The combinations used did not improve the outcome obtained with AZA alone. However, our "pick a winner" randomised strategy may remain useful with potentially more active drugs to be tested in combination with AZA., (© 2022 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The phase 3 MIRROS (MDM2 antagonist Idasanutlin in Relapsed or Refractory acute myeloid leukemia [AML] for Overall Survival) trial (NCT02545283) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the small-molecule MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin plus cytarabine in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Adults (n = 447) with R/R AML whose disease relapsed or was refractory after ≤2 prior induction regimens as initial treatment or following salvage chemotherapy regimen, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 were enrolled regardless of TP53 mutation status and randomly assigned 2:1 to idasanutlin 300 mg or placebo orally twice daily plus cytarabine 1 g/m2 IV on days 1 to 5 of 28-day cycles. At primary analysis (cutoff, November 2019), 436 patients were enrolled, including 355 in the TP53 wild-type intention-to-treat (TP53WT-ITT) population. The primary endpoint, overall survival in the TP53WT-ITT population, was not met (median, 8.3 vs 9.1 months with idasanutlin-cytarabine vs placebo-cytarabine; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.45; P = .58). The complete remission (CR) rate, a key secondary endpoint, was 20.3% vs 17.1% (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 0.70-2.18). The overall response rate (ORR) was 38.8% vs 22.0% (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.36-3.72). Common any-grade adverse events (≥10% incidence in any arm) were diarrhea (87.0% vs 32.9%), febrile neutropenia (52.8% vs 49.3%), and nausea (52.5% vs 31.5%). In summary, despite improved ORR, adding idasanutlin to cytarabine did not improve overall survival or CR rates in patients with R/R AML., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and safety of venetoclax + azacitidine among treatment-naïve patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia., Patients and Methods: Data were pooled from patients enrolled in a phase III study (NCT02993523) that compared patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine or placebo + azacitidine and a prior phase Ib study (NCT02203773) where patients were treated with venetoclax + azacitidine. Enrolled patients were ineligible for intensive therapy due to age ≥75 years and/or comorbidities. Patients on venetoclax + azacitidine received venetoclax 400 mg orally (days 1-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m2; days 1-7/28-day cycle). FLT3 mutation was analyzed centrally on pretreatment bone marrow aspirates., Results: In the biomarker evaluable population, FLT3 mutation was detected in 42 (15%) and 22 (19%) patients in the venetoclax + azacitidine and azacitidine groups. Composite complete remission [CRc; complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)] rates (venetoclax + azacitidine/azacitidine) for FLT3-mutant patients were 67%/36%, median duration of remission (DoR) was 17.3/5.0 months, and median OS was 12.5/8.6 months. The CRc rates among FLT3 wild-type patients were 67%/25%, median DoR 18.4/13.4 months, and median OS 14.7/10.1 months. In patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine, CRc in patients with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD was 63% and 77% and median OS was 9.9 and 19.2 months, and in comutated FLT3-ITD + NPM1 patients, CRc was 70%, median DoR was not reached, and median OS was 9.1 months. There were no unexpected toxicities in the venetoclax + azacitidine group., Conclusions: When treated with venetoclax + azacitidine, patients with FLT3 mutations and FLT3 wild-type had similar outcomes. Future analyses in larger patient populations may further define the impact of venetoclax + azacitidine in patients harboring FLT3-ITD. See related commentary by Perl and Vyas, p. 2719., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is indicated for relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), based on its observed superior response and survival outcomes compared with salvage chemotherapy (SC). Frontline use of FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) midostaurin and sorafenib may contribute to cross-resistance to single-agent gilteritinib in the R/R AML setting but has not been well characterized. To clarify the potential clinical impact of prior TKI use, we retrospectively compared clinical outcomes in patients with R/R FLT3-mutated AML in the CHRYSALIS and ADMIRAL trials who received prior midostaurin or sorafenib against those without prior FLT3 TKI exposure. Similarly high rates of composite complete remission (CRc) were observed in patients who received a FLT3 TKI before gilteritinib (CHRYSALIS, 42%; ADMIRAL, 52%) and those without prior FLT3 TKI therapy (CHRYSALIS, 43%; ADMIRAL, 55%). Among patients who received a prior FLT3 TKI in ADMIRAL, a higher CRc rate (52%) and trend toward longer median overall survival was observed in the gilteritinib arm versus the SC arm (CRc = 20%; overall survival, 5.1 months; HR = 0.602; 95% CI: 0.299, 1.210). Remission duration was shorter with prior FLT3 TKI exposure. These findings support gilteritinib for FLT3-mutated R/R AML after prior sorafenib or midostaurin., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Despite recent advances in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) molecular characterization and targeted therapies, a majority of AML cases still lack therapeutically actionable targets. In 127 AML cases with unmet therapeutic needs, as defined by the exclusion of ELN favorable cases and of FLT3-ITD mutations, we identified 51 (40%) cases with alterations in RAS pathway genes (RAS+, mostly NF1, NRAS, KRAS, and PTPN11 genes). In 79 homogeneously treated AML patients from this cohort, RAS+ status were associated with higher white blood cell count, higher LDH, and reduced survival. In AML models of oncogenic addiction to RAS-MEK signaling, the MEK inhibitor trametinib demonstrated antileukemic activity in vitro and in vivo. However, the efficacy of trametinib was heterogeneous in ex vivo cultures of primary RAS+ AML patient specimens. From repurposing drug screens in RAS-activated AML cells, we identified pyrvinium pamoate, an anti-helminthic agent efficiently inhibiting the growth of RAS+ primary AML cells ex vivo, preferentially in trametinib-resistant PTPN11- or KRAS-mutated samples. Metabolic and genetic complementarity between trametinib and pyrvinium pamoate translated into anti-AML synergy in vitro. Moreover, this combination inhibited the propagation of RA+ AML cells in vivo in mice, indicating a potential for future clinical development of this strategy in AML., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The combination of ivosidenib - an inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) - and azacitidine showed encouraging clinical activity in a phase 1b trial involving patients with newly diagnosed IDH1 -mutated acute myeloid leukemia., Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed IDH1 -mutated acute myeloid leukemia who were ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy to receive oral ivosidenib (500 mg once daily) and subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area for 7 days in 28-day cycles) or to receive matched placebo and azacitidine. The primary end point was event-free survival, defined as the time from randomization until treatment failure (i.e., the patient did not have complete remission by week 24), relapse from remission, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first., Results: The intention-to-treat population included 146 patients: 72 in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group and 74 in the placebo-and-azacitidine group. At a median follow-up of 12.4 months, event-free survival was significantly longer in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group than in the placebo-and-azacitidine group (hazard ratio for treatment failure, relapse from remission, or death, 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.69; P = 0.002). The estimated probability that a patient would remain event-free at 12 months was 37% in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group and 12% in the placebo-and-azacitidine group. The median overall survival was 24.0 months with ivosidenib and azacitidine and 7.9 months with placebo and azacitidine (hazard ratio for death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.73; P = 0.001). Common adverse events of grade 3 or higher included febrile neutropenia (28% with ivosidenib and azacitidine and 34% with placebo and azacitidine) and neutropenia (27% and 16%, respectively); the incidence of bleeding events of any grade was 41% and 29%, respectively. The incidence of infection of any grade was 28% with ivosidenib and azacitidine and 49% with placebo and azacitidine. Differentiation syndrome of any grade occurred in 14% of the patients receiving ivosidenib and azacitidine and 8% of those receiving placebo and azacitidine., Conclusions: Ivosidenib and azacitidine showed significant clinical benefit as compared with placebo and azacitidine in this difficult-to-treat population. Febrile neutropenia and infections were less frequent in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group than in the placebo-and-azacitidine group, whereas neutropenia and bleeding were more frequent in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group. (Funded by Agios Pharmaceuticals and Servier Pharmaceuticals; AGILE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03173248.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Phase 3 trials Viale-A and Viale-C evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy who received venetoclax (VEN) + (AZA) (Viale-A) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) (Viale-C) or placebo (PBO) + AZA or LDAC. Patient-reported outcomes included: EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS/QoL) and physical functioning (PF), PROMIS Cancer Fatigue Short Form 7a (Fatigue), and EQ-5D-5L health status visual analog scale (HS-VAS). Time to deterioration (TTD), defined as worsening from baseline in meaningful change thresholds (MCT) of ≥10, 5, or 7 points for GHS/QoL or PF, fatigue, and HS-VAS, respectively, was assessed; differences between groups were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and unadjusted log-rank analyses. VEN + AZA vs PBO + AZA patients had longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.066) and fatigue (P = 0.189), and significantly longer TTD in PF (P = 0.028) and HS-VAS (P < 0.001). VEN + LDAC vs PBO + LDAC patients had significantly longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.011), PF (P = 0.020), and fatigue (P = 0.004), and a trend in HS-VAS (P = 0.057). Approximately 43%, 35%, 32%, and 18% of patients treated with VEN + AZA, AZA + PBO, VEN + LDAC, or LDAC + PBO, respectively, saw improvements >MCT in GHS/QoL. Overall, VEN may positively impact HRQoL in patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, leading to longer preservation of functioning and overall health status., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Daunorubicin pharmacokinetics (PK) are characterised by an important inter-individual variability, which raises questions about the optimal dose regimen in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. The aim of the study is to assess the joint daunorubicin/daunorubicinol PK profile and to define an optimal population PK study design. Fourteen patients were enrolled in the PK ancillary study of the BIG-1 trial and 6-8 samples were taken up to 24 h after administration of the first dose of daunorubicin (90 mg/m 2 /day). Daunorubicin and daunorubicinol quantifications were assessed using a validated liquid chromatography technique coupled with a fluorescence detector method. Data were analysed using a non-compartmental approach and non-linear mixed effects modelling. Optimal sampling strategy was proposed using the R function PFIM. The median daunorubicin and daunorubicinol AUC0-tlast were 577 ng/mL·hr (Range: 375-1167) and 2200 ng/mL·hr (range: 933-4683), respectively. The median metabolic ratio was 0.32 (range: 0.1-0.44). Daunorubicin PK was best described by a three-compartment parent, two-compartment metabolite model, with a double first-order transformation of daunorubicin to metabolite. Body surface area and plasma creatinine had a significant impact on the daunorubicin and daunorubicinol PK. A practical optimal population design has been derived from this model with five sampling times per subject (0.5, 0.75, 2, 9, 24 h) and this can be used for a future population PK study.

Harnessing or monitoring immune cells is actually a major topic in pre-clinical and clinical studies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mucosal-Associated Invariant T cells (MAIT) constitute one of the largest subset of innate-like, cytotoxic T cell subsets in humans. Despite some papers suggesting a role for MAIT cells in cancer, their specific involvement remains unclear, especially in myeloid malignancies. This prospective monocentric study included 216 patients with a newly diagnosed AML. Circulating MAIT cells were quantified by flow cytometry at diagnosis and during intensive chemotherapy. We observed that circulating MAIT cells show a specific decline in AML patients at diagnosis compared to healthy donors. Post-induction monitored patients presented with a drastic drop in MAIT cell numbers, with recovery after one month. We also found correlation between decrease in MAIT cells number and adverse cytogenetic profile. FLT3-ITD and IDH ½ mutations were associated with higher MAIT cell numbers. Patients with high level of activated MAIT cells are under-represented within patients with a favorable cytogenetic profile, and over-represented among patients with IDH1 mutations or bi-allelic CEBPA mutations. We show for the first time that circulating MAIT cells are affected in newly diagnosed AML patients, suggesting a link between MAIT cells and AML progression. Our work fosters new studies to deepen our knowledge about the role of MAIT cells in cancer., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: There is limited evidence on the clinical utility of monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy. Herein, we explored the outcomes of patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine who achieved composite complete remission (CRc; complete remission + complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and MRD < 10 -3 in the VIALE-A trial., Methods: The patients included in this report were treated with venetoclax and azacitidine. Bone marrow aspirate samples for multiparametric flow cytometry assessments were collected for central analysis at baseline, end of cycle 1, and every three cycles thereafter. MRD-negative response was defined as < 1 residual blast per 1,000 leukocytes (< 10 -3 or 0.1%) with an estimated analytic sensitivity of 0.0037%-0.0027%. CRc, duration of remission (DoR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors associated with OS., Results: One hundred sixty-four of one hundred ninety (86%) patients with CRc were evaluable for MRD. MRD < 10 -3 was achieved by 67 of 164 (41%), and 97 of 164 (59%) had MRD ≥ 10 -3 . The median DoR, EFS, and OS were not reached in patients with CRc and MRD < 10 -3 , and the 12-month estimates for DoR, EFS, and OS in this group were 81.2%, 83.2%, and 94.0%. Among patients with CRc and MRD ≥ 10 -3 , the median DoR, EFS, and OS were 9.7, 10.6, and 18.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that CRc with MRD < 10 -3 was a strong predictor of OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.285; 95% CI, 0.159 to 0.510; P < .001)., Conclusion: Patients who achieved CRc and MRD < 10 -3 with venetoclax and azacitidine had longer DoR, EFS, and OS, than responding patients with MRD ≥ 10 -3 ., Competing Interests: Keith W. PratzConsulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, Boston Biomedical, AbbVieResearch Funding: Agios (Inst), Millennium (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst) Brian A. JonasConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, GlycoMimetics, Treadwell Therapeutics, Takeda, Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, PfizerResearch Funding: Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Glycomimetics (Inst), Celgene (Inst), FORMA Therapeutics (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Arog (Inst), Roche (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Sigma-Tau (Inst), Forty Seven¸ Amgen (Inst), Immune-Onc Therapeutics (Inst), Loxo (Inst), Gilead/Forty Seven (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Vinod PullarkatConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie/GenentechSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Christian RecherConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Janssen, Astellas Pharma, MacroGenics¸ Daiichi Sankyo, Otsuka, Novartis¸ Incyte, Pfizer¸ Roche, TakedaResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Agios (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), MaaT Pharma (Inst), Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), IQVIA (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Incyte, Celgene, Sanofi, Amgen, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences Andre C. SchuhHonoraria: Celgene, Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Celgene, Amgen, Agios, Pfizer Michael J. ThirmanConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Genentech, AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Celgene¸ PharmacyclicsResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst), Syndax (Inst), Merck (Inst), TG Therapeutics (Inst) Jacqueline S. GarciaConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Takeda, Astellas PharmaResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Prelude Therapeutics (Inst) Courtney D. DiNardoThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Leadership: Notable LabsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Notable LabsHonoraria: Agios, Celgene, AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Agios, AbbVieResearch Funding: AbbVie, Agios, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo Vladimir VorobyevConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, Novartis, BeiGene, Roche, AbbVie, Takeda, Gilead SciencesSpeakers' Bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, BioCad, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda¸ Novartis, BeiGeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Nicola S. FracchiollaConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer Su-Peng YehHonoraria: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen¸ Takeda, AbbVie, Amgen, Sanofi, Bayer, Astellas PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Sanofi, Novartis, Pfizer, Chugai Pharma Jun Ho JangSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis Muhit OzcanResearch Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Bayer, Merck, Archigen Biotech, Roche, AbbVie, Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca Kazuhito YamamotoHonoraria: Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda¸ Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Sumitomo Dainippon, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Novartis, Otsuka, Mundipharma, Eisai, MSD, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Sanofi, Nippon Shinyaku, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, Micron, Daiichi SankyoConsulting or Advisory Role: Ono Pharmaceutical, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Chugai Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Celgene, HUYA Bioscience International, Stemline Therapeutics, Eisai, Janssen, AstraZeneca¸ Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie,Research Funding: Chugai Pharma (Inst), Novartis (Inst), ARIAD (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Solasia Pharma (Inst), MSD (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Zenyaku Kogyo (Inst), Bayer (Inst), SymBio Pharmaceuticals (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Mundipharma (Inst), Yakult Pharmaceutical (Inst) Arpad IllesConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, CelgeneResearch Funding: Takeda, Seattle GeneticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche Ying ZhouStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Monique DailEmployment: Genentech/RocheStock and Other Ownership Interests: Roche/Genentech Brenda ChylaEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Jalaja PotluriEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Hartmut DöhnerConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Agios¸ Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Oncology, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie, GEMoaB, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead Sciences, SyndaxResearch Funding: Arog, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Kronos BioNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: A single-group, phase 1-2 study indicated that eltrombopag improved the efficacy of standard immunosuppressive therapy that entailed horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine in patients with severe aplastic anemia., Methods: In this prospective, investigator-led, open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of horse ATG plus cyclosporine with or without eltrombopag as front-line therapy in previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia. The primary end point was a hematologic complete response at 3 months., Results: Patients were assigned to receive immunosuppressive therapy (Group A, 101 patients) or immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag (Group B, 96 patients). The percentage of patients who had a complete response at 3 months was 10% in Group A and 22% in Group B (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 7.8; P = 0.01). At 6 months, the overall response rate (the percentage of patients who had a complete or partial response) was 41% in Group A and 68% in Group B. The median times to the first response were 8.8 months (Group A) and 3.0 months (Group B). The incidence of severe adverse events was similar in the two groups. With a median follow-up of 24 months, a karyotypic abnormality that was classified as myelodysplastic syndrome developed in 1 patient (Group A) and 2 patients (Group B); event-free survival was 34% and 46%, respectively. Somatic mutations were detected in 29% (Group A) and 31% (Group Β) of the patients at baseline; these percentages increased to 66% and 55%, respectively, at 6 months, without affecting the hematologic response and 2-year outcome., Conclusions: The addition of eltrombopag to standard immunosuppressive therapy improved the rate, rapidity, and strength of hematologic response among previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia, without additional toxic effects. (Funded by Novartis and others; RACE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02099747; EudraCT number, 2014-000363-40.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

The PEAK1 and Pragmin/PEAK2 pseudo-kinases have emerged as important components of the protein tyrosine kinase pathway implicated in cancer progression. They can signal using a scaffolding mechanism that involves a conserved split helical dimerization (SHED) module. We recently identified PEAK3 as a novel member of this family based on structural homology; however, its signaling mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we found that, although it can self-associate, PEAK3 shows higher evolutionary divergence than PEAK1/2. Moreover, the PEAK3 protein is strongly expressed in human hematopoietic cells and is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia. Functionally, PEAK3 overexpression in U2OS sarcoma cells enhanced their growth and migratory properties, while its silencing in THP1 leukemic cells reduced these effects. Importantly, an intact SHED module was required for these PEAK3 oncogenic activities. Mechanistically, through a phosphokinase survey, we identified PEAK3 as a novel inducer of AKT signaling, independent of growth-factor stimulation. Then, proteomic analyses revealed that PEAK3 interacts with the signaling proteins GRB2 and ASAP1/2 and the protein kinase PYK2, and that these interactions require the SHED domain. Moreover, PEAK3 activated PYK2, which promoted PEAK3 tyrosine phosphorylation, its association with GRB2 and ASAP1, and AKT signaling. Thus, the PEAK1-3 pseudo-kinases may use a conserved SHED-dependent mechanism to activate specific signaling proteins to promote oncogenesis.

Background: The present study evaluated the relative survival benefits associated with enasidenib and current standard of care (SoC) therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)., Methods: Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared survival outcomes observed with enasidenib 100 mg daily in the phase I/II AG221-C-001 trial and SoC outcomes obtained from a real-world chart review of patients in France., Results: Before matching, enasidenib (n = 195) was associated with numerically improved overall survival (OS) relative to SoC (n = 80; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.11). After matching and adjusting for covariates (n = 78 per group), mortality risk was significantly lower with enasidenib than with SoC (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.97). The median OS was 9.26 months for enasidenib (95% CI, 7.72-13.24) and 4.76 months for SoC (95% CI, 3.81-8.21). Results remained robust across all sensitivity analyses conducted., Conclusions: PSM analyses indicate that enasidenib significantly prolongs survival relative to SoC among patients with R/R AML and an IDH2 mutation who are ineligible for HSCT. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings using other data sources and to assess the comparative efficacy of enasidenib for other treatment outcomes., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In this phase 3 trial, older patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive the polo-like kinase inhibitor, volasertib (V; 350 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 in 4-wk cycles), combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 20 mg subcutaneous, twice daily, days 1-10; n = 444), or LDAC plus placebo (P; n = 222). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Primary ORR analysis at recruitment completion included patients randomized ≥5 months beforehand; ORR was 25.2% for V+LDAC and 16.8% for P+LDAC (n = 371; odds ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-2.89]; P = 0.071). At final analysis (≥574 OS events), median OS was 5.6 months for V+LDAC and 6.5 months for P+LDAC (n = 666; hazard ratio 0.97 [95% CI, 0.8-1.2]; P = 0.757). The most common adverse events (AEs) were infections/infestations (grouped term; V+LDAC, 81.3%; P+LDAC, 63.5%) and febrile neutropenia (V+LDAC, 60.4%; P+LDAC, 29.3%). Fatal AEs occurred in 31.2% with V+LDAC versus 18.0% with P+LDAC, most commonly infections/infestations (V+LDAC, 17.1%; P+LDAC, 6.3%). Lack of OS benefit with V+LDAC versus P+LDAC may reflect increased early mortality with V+LDAC from myelosuppression and infections., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Objectives: The impact of conventional treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on the nutritional, cognitive, and functional status of elderly patients is seldom studied. This assessment was performed in the context of the LAMSA 2007 trial., Methods: The trial enrolled 424 patients with de novo AML. Among them, 316 benefited from geriatric assessment (GA) including nutritional, cognitive, and functional status and were scored according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and sorror for the prediction of treatment toxicity, morbidity, and mortality. Patients were investigated at diagnosis for three times during follow-up., Results: This study showed that AML and its treatment have no impact on cognitive (P = .554) nor functional status (P = .842 for Activity of Daily Living and P = .087 for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living). The nutritional status improved over time (P = .041). None of these three parameters at baseline, associated or not with ECOG and sorror scores, impacted survivals or toxicities., Conclusions: The cognitive, functional, and nutritional status had no impact in this cohort of fit elderly AML patients without unfavorable cytogenetics. The GA tools used provided no additional information compared with ECOG and sorror scores, to predict toxicity, morbidity, or mortality due to intensive chemotherapy., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) intensive chemotherapy combined with broad-spectrum antibiotics, leads to gut microbiota dysbiosis promoting pathological conditions and an increased incidence of complications. Here we report findings from a phase II single-arm, multicenter study evaluating autologous fecal microbiota transfer (AFMT) in 25 AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and antibiotics (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02928523). The co-primary outcomes of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of AFMT in dysbiosis correction and multidrug-resistant bacteria eradication. The main secondary outcomes are to define a dysbiosis biosignature, to evaluate the effect of dysbiosis correction on patient clinical status, to assess the short and mid-term safety of AFMT in this immunocompromised population, and to evaluate the feasibility of the AFMT procedure and acceptability by the patient. Intensive induction chemotherapy induces a dramatic decrease of α-diversity indices, and a microbial dysbiosis with a significant shift of the microbial communities and domination of pro-inflammatory families. After AFMT treatment, α-diversity indices return to their initial mean levels and the similarity index shows the restoration of microbial communities. The trial meets pre-specified endpoints. AFMT appears to be safe and may be effective for gut microbiota restoration in AML patients receiving intensive chemotherapy and antibiotics, with an excellent gut microbiota reconstruction based on both richness and diversity indices at the species level.

In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated by intensive chemotherapy (IC), prognostic significance of co-occurring genetic alterations and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are of particular interest with the advent of IDH1/2 mutant inhibitors. We retrospectively analyzed 319 patients with newly diagnosed AML (127 with IDH1, 135 with IDH2R140, and 57 with IDH2R172 mutations) treated with IC in 3 Acute Leukemia French Association prospective trials. In each IDH subgroup, we analyzed the prognostic impact of clinical and genetic covariates, and the role of HSCT. In patients with IDH1 mutations, the presence of NPM1 mutations was the only variable predicting improved overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis (P < .0001). In IDH2R140-mutated AML, normal karyotype (P = .008) and NPM1 mutations (P = .01) predicted better OS. NPM1 mutations were associated with better disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0009), whereas the presence of DNMT3A mutations was associated with shorter DFS (P = .0006). In IDH2R172-mutated AML, platelet count was the only variable retained in the multivariate model for OS (P = .002). Among nonfavorable European LeukemiaNet 2010-eligible patients, 71 (36%) underwent HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) and had longer OS (P = .03) and DFS (P = .02) than nontransplanted patients. Future clinical trials testing frontline IDH inhibitors combined with IC may consider stratification on NPM1 mutational status, the primary prognostic factor in IDH1- or IDH2R140-mutated AML. HSCT improve OS of nonfavorable IDH1/2-mutated AML and should be fully integrated into the treatment strategy., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: TP53 -mutated ( TP53m ) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have very poor outcome irrespective of the treatment received, including 40% responses (20% complete remission [CR]) with azacitidine (AZA) alone, short response duration, and a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 6 months. Eprenetapopt (APR-246), a novel first-in-class drug, leads to p53 protein reconformation and reactivates its proapoptotic and cell-cycle arrest functions., Patients and Methods: This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of eprenetapopt in combination with AZA in untreated high or very high International Prognostic Scoring System-R TP53m MDS and AML patients., Results: Fifty-two TP53m patients (34 MDS, 18 AML [including seven with more than 30% blasts]) were enrolled. In MDS, we observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 62%, including 47% CR, with a median duration of response at 10.4 months. In AML, the ORR was 33% including 17% CR (27% and 0% CR in AML with less than and more than 30% marrow blasts, respectively). Seventy-three percent of responders achieved TP53 next-generation sequencing negativity (ie, variant allele frequency < 5%). The main treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (36%) and neurologic adverse events (40%), the latter correlating with a lower glomerular filtration rate at treatment onset ( P < .01) and higher age ( P = .05), and resolving with temporary drug interruption without recurrence after adequate eprenetapopt dose reduction. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months, median OS was 12.1 months in MDS, and 13.9 and 3.0 months in AML with less than and more than 30% marrow blasts, respectively., Conclusion: In this very high-risk population of TP53m MDS and AML patients, eprenetapopt combined with AZA was safe and showed potentially higher ORR and CR rate, and longer OS than reported with AZA alone., Competing Interests: Thomas CluzeauConsulting or Advisory Role: Abbvie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Syros PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Astellas PharmaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Jacqueline Lehmann-CheConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Roche Pierre PeterlinConsulting or Advisory Role: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly Odile Beyne RauzyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis Christian RecherConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Pfizer, Incyte, Novartis, Otsuka, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Macrogenics, Janssen, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, CelgeneResearch Funding: Abbvie, Roche, MaaT Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Agios, Chugai Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Amgen, CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, Sanofi, Incyte Aspasia StamatoullasHonoraria: CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer Lise WillemsHonoraria: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis Emmanuel RaffouxTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbvie, Roche Bruno QuesnelResearch Funding: Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH Michael LoschiConsulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, Iqone, NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis/Pfizer, MSD Antoine F. CarpentierStock and Other Ownership Interests: AltevaxHonoraria: Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb David A. SallmanConsulting or Advisory Role: Syndax, Novartis, Magenta Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Intellia Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Aprea AB, Abbvie, Celyad, AgiosSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, AgiosResearch Funding: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, CelgenePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Patent for LB-100 in MDS Rami KomrokjiStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbvieConsulting or Advisory Role: Acceleron Pharma, Abbvie, Geron, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Jazz PharmaceuticalsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte Lionel AdesResearch Funding: CelgeneHonoraria: Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, BerGenBio, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Celgene Pierre FenauxHonoraria: CelgeneResearch Funding: CelgeneNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The aims of this study were to characterize the incidence and outcomes of severe toxicities following the administration of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX; ≥1 g/m 2 ). Among the 468 patients included in the study, 69 (14.9%) developed at least one episode of acute kidney injury (AKI; 138/1264 HD-MTX administrations), including 34 (7.2%) who developed KDIGO stage 2-3 AKI. The three baseline factors independently associated with the risk of developing AKI were age, body mass index and a diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Higher plasma MTX concentration was associated with AKI and extra-renal toxicities. Notwithstanding potentially confounding factors, most patients with AKI who received glucarpidase ( n  = 41) developed extra-renal toxicity (leading to the death of two patients) despite early administration. Thus, severe toxicity and death can occur whether or not glucarpidase is administered, which confirms the need for further interventional studies to provide greater precision on its role in the management of HD-MTX toxicity.

CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin approved for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (MRC-AML). We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of CPX-351 in a real-world setting in 103 patients from 12 French centers, including the evaluation of molecular abnormalities at baseline and minimal residual disease (MRD) in responding patients, compared with a historical data set from Bordeaux-Toulouse DATAML registry. A favorable safety profile was observed, with a low frequency of alopecia (11%) and gastrointestinal toxicity (50%). The overall response rate after induction was 59%, and MRD <10-3 was achieved in 57% of complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) patients. Only the presence of mutated TP53 (P = .02) or PTPN11 (P = .004) predicted lower response in multivariate analysis. Interestingly, high-risk molecular prognosis subgroups defined by 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification, including ASXL1 and RUNX1 mutations, were not associated with a significantly lower response rate using CPX-351. With a median follow-up of 8.6 months, median overall survival (OS) was 16.1 months. Thirty-six patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation with a significantly longer median OS compared with nontransplanted patients (P < .001). In multivariate analyses, only spliceosome mutations were associated with better OS (P = .04). In comparison with intensive chemotherapy, there was no difference in OS for patients <60 years. These data confirm the efficacy and safety of CPX-351 in high-risk AML (t-AML and MRC-AML) in a real-life setting. CPX-351 is a treatment of choice for patients aged ≥60 years., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Introduction: The identification of specific molecular signatures and the development of new targeted drugs have changed the paradigm of onco-nephrology, now allowing a multiscale approach of kidney involvement related to hematologic malignancies relying on combined hematologic and molecular assessments. In this study, we aimed to refine the spectrum of kidney disorders associated with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), 2 very rare conditions scarcely described., Methods: Case series. Patients with myeloid neoplasms who were referred to Toulouse University Hospital Nephrology Unit and were diagnosed with acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or urine abnormalities were retrospectively included., Results: Eighteen patients (males n =13, CMML n =8, essential thrombocytosis [ET] n =7, polycythemia vera [PV] n =1, and myelofibrosis n =2) developed kidney disease 7.7±2 years after the diagnosis of the malignancy. Twelve patients had AKI at presentation. Eight patients had glomerular presentation (high-range proteinuria 33%, microscopic hematuria 56%). Kidney biopsy ( n =14) showed various patterns, including pauci-immune glomerulosclerosis ( n =5), extramedullary hematopoiesis ( n =6), or tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis with polymorphic inflammation ( n =8). Immunostaining of CD61 confirmed the infiltration of megakaryocytes within glomeruli or interstitium in 5 of 8 patients. Other pictures of glomerulopathy were identified in 3 patients (IgA nephropathy n =2, AA amyloidosis n =1). Massive kidney infiltration by CMML was identified in 1 patient. After a mean follow-up of 24±6 months, malignancy was considered as stable in 11 patients (61%), but 22% of patients had progressed to end-stage renal failure. The remaining had persistently reduced kidney function. No correlation between the malignancy and the renal presentation and outcomes could be identified., Conclusions: Kidney complications of CMML/MPN are heterogenous, and kidney biopsy may help to identify new molecular targets to prevent the development of kidney fibrosis., (© 2021 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The development of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other B cell malignancies. The first-generation inhibitor ibrutinib works by covalent irreversible binding to BTK, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase of the TEC (transient erythroblastopenia of childhood) family that plays a critical role in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway. It also induces an 'off-target' inhibition of a range of other kinases including (but not limited to) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), SRC, and other kinases of the TEC family (interleukin-2-inducible T-cell kinase [ITK], Tec, BMX). Dermatological toxicities are among the most common toxicities of ibrutinib, but remain of mild to moderate intensity in most cases and are readily manageable. Their incidence is highest during the first year of treatment and declines over time. In addition, it has been postulated that ibrutinib-related dermatologic adverse events are mediated by the direct binding to both BTK and other 'off-target' kinases. Bruising, ecchymoses, and petechiae represent the most characteristic dermatologic adverse events. Nail and hair changes are also common, as skin infections (opportunistic infections including herpes simplex and herpes zoster virus reactivations, and Staphylococcus aureus superinfection), folliculitis, and other types of rashes. Panniculitis, aphthous-like ulcerations with stomatitis, neutrophilic dermatosis, peripheral edema, and skin cracking can also occur. Next-generation BTK inhibitors, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, have been designed to optimize BTK inhibition and minimize off-target inhibition of alternative kinases (Tec, ITK, EGFR, SRC-family kinases). These drugs have been recently FDA-approved for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Although the overall incidence of their toxicities is expected to be more limited, acalubrutinib and zanubrutinib are associated with a range of dermatologic toxic effects that appear to be similar to those previously described with ibrutinib, including bruising and ecchymoses, panniculitis, human herpesvirus infections, cellulitis, and skin rash. In particular, both drugs induce skin bleeding events in more than 30% of patients treated. However, the available dermatological data are still rather limited and will have to be consolidated prospectively. This review article analyses the wide spectrum of dermatological toxicities that can be encountered with first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors. Finally, recommendations for appropriate treatment as well as a synthesis algorithm for management are also proposed.

Hypomethylating agents are a classical frontline low-intensity therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Recently, TP53 gene mutations have been described as a potential predictive biomarker of better outcome in patients treated with a ten-day decitabine regimen., However, functional characteristics of TP53 mutant are heterogeneous, as reflected in multiple functional TP53 classifications and their impact in patients treated with azacitidine is less clear. We analyzed the therapeutic course and outcome of 279 patients treated with azacitidine between 2007 and 2016, prospectively enrolled in our regional healthcare network. By screening 224 of them, we detected TP53 mutations in 55 patients (24.6%), including 53 patients (96.4%) harboring high-risk cytogenetics. The identification of any TP53 mutation was associated with worse overall survival but not with response to azacitidine in the whole cohort and in the subgroup of patients with adverse karyotype. Stratification of patients according to three recent validated functional classifications did not allow the identification of TP53 mutated patients who could benefit from azacitidine. Systematic TP53 mutant classification will deserve further exploration in the setting of patients treated with conventional therapy and in the emerging field of therapies targeting TP53 pathway., Competing Interests: Christian Recher has received research funding from Celgene, unrelated to this study. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: Midostaurin (MIDO) combined with standard chemotherapy was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2017 for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on results from the RATIFY trial., Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare MIDO and standard-of-care (SOC) to SOC alone in France. Per Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) guidelines, a partitioned survival model with eight health states was used: diagnosis/induction, complete remission, relapse, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), HSCT recovery, post-HSCT recovery (stabilized after HSCT recovery), post-HSCT relapse, and mortality. A lifetime horizon was used beginning at diagnosis with a "cure model,", which assumed natural mortality after trial cut-off. Utility values were obtained from a systematic literature review and included disutilities. Resource utilization was based on HAS clinical guidelines and a survey of French physicians and included drugs and administration, adverse events, routine medical care, HSCT, and end-of-life care costs., Results: In RATIFY and after extrapolation, MIDO improved survival compared to SOC, translating into MIDO-treated patients gaining 1.12 life years (LYs) and 1.23 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus SOC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for MIDO versus SOC was €68,781 per LY and €62,305 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed consistency with base case findings., Conclusions: MIDO represents a clinically significant advancement in the management of newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML. In this analysis, MIDO add-on therapy showed gains in LYs and QALYs versus SOC alone and was found to be a cost-effective option at a €100,000 per QALY threshold for end-of-life treatment.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive leukemia for which we developed a nationwide network to collect data from new cases diagnosed in France. In a retrospective, observational study of 86 patients (2000-2013), we described clinical and biological data focusing on morphologies and immunophenotype. We found expression of markers associated with plasmacytoid dendritic cell origin (HLA-DRhigh, CD303+, CD304+, and cTCL1+) plus CD4 and CD56 and frequent expression of isolated markers from the myeloid, B-, and T-lymphoid lineages, whereas specific markers (myeloperoxidase, CD14, cCD3, CD19, and cCD22) were not expressed. Fifty-one percent of cytogenetic abnormalities impact chromosomes 13, 12, 9, and 15. Myelemia was associated with an adverse prognosis. We categorized chemotherapeutic regimens into 5 groups: acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-like, acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL)-like, lymphoma (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [CHOP])-like, high-dose methotrexate with asparaginase (Aspa-MTX) chemotherapies, and not otherwise specified (NOS) treatments. Thirty patients received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), and 4 patients received autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. There was no difference in survival between patients receiving AML-like, ALL-like, or Aspa-MTX regimens; survival was longer in patients who received AML-like, ALL-like, or Aspa-MTX regimens than in those who received CHOP-like regimens or NOS. Eleven patients are in persistent complete remission after allo-HCT with a median survival of 49 months vs 8 for other patients. Our series confirms a high response rate with a lower toxicity profile with the Aspa-MTX regimen, offering the best chance of access to hematopoietic cell transplantation and a possible cure., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

L-asparaginase is a key chemotherapeutic agent in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It is also known for multiple and severe specific toxicities, without consensual management. We report the case of a 51-year-old man treated with L-asparaginase for recently diagnosed T-cell ALL. During the treatment, he developed a coma due to multifactorial diffuse cerebral edema, by hepatic encephalopathy, cerebral venous thrombosis, and hyperammonemia, all linked to toxicity of L-asparaginase. Specific and innovative treatments were employed to manage these toxicities: supplementation with L-carnitine, thiamine, and pyridoxine for hepatic toxicity, perfusion of sodium benzoate to decrease ammonemia, and extrahepatic albumin-based dialysis sessions, along with anticoagulation. The patient improved within two weeks and is currently alive 13 months later, in first complete remission, without sequelae, on an alleviated chemotherapy regimen., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Guillaume Beziat et al.)

Background: Patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene ( FLT3 ) infrequently have a response to salvage chemotherapy. Gilteritinib is an oral, potent, selective FLT3 inhibitor with single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory FLT3 -mutated AML., Methods: In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with relapsed or refractory FLT3 -mutated AML in a 2:1 ratio to receive either gilteritinib (at a dose of 120 mg per day) or salvage chemotherapy. The two primary end points were overall survival and the percentage of patients who had complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery. Secondary end points included event-free survival (freedom from treatment failure [i.e., relapse or lack of remission] or death) and the percentage of patients who had complete remission., Results: Of 371 eligible patients, 247 were randomly assigned to the gilteritinib group and 124 to the salvage chemotherapy group. The median overall survival in the gilteritinib group was significantly longer than that in the chemotherapy group (9.3 months vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.83; P<0.001). The median event-free survival was 2.8 months in the gilteritinib group and 0.7 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for treatment failure or death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.09). The percentage of patients who had complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery was 34.0% in the gilteritinib group and 15.3% in the chemotherapy group (risk difference, 18.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 9.8 to 27.4); the percentages with complete remission were 21.1% and 10.5%, respectively (risk difference, 10.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.8 to 18.4). In an analysis that was adjusted for therapy duration, adverse events of grade 3 or higher and serious adverse events occurred less frequently in the gilteritinib group than in the chemotherapy group; the most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher in the gilteritinib group were febrile neutropenia (45.9%), anemia (40.7%), and thrombocytopenia (22.8%)., Conclusions: Gilteritinib resulted in significantly longer survival and higher percentages of patients with remission than salvage chemotherapy among patients with relapsed or refractory FLT3 -mutated AML. (Funded by Astellas Pharma; ADMIRAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02421939.)., (Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: Nucleophosmin 1 ( NPM1 ) mutations are associated with a favorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) when an internal tandem duplication (ITD) in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 gene ( FLT3 ) is absent ( FLT3 -ITD neg ) or present with a low allelic ratio ( FLT3 -ITD low ). The 2017 European LeukemiaNet guidelines assume this is true regardless of accompanying cytogenetic abnormalities. We investigated the validity of this assumption., Methods: We analyzed associations between karyotype and outcome in intensively treated patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3 -ITD neg/low AML who were prospectively enrolled in registry databases from nine international study groups or treatment centers., Results: Among 2,426 patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3 -ITD neg/low AML, 2,000 (82.4%) had a normal and 426 (17.6%) had an abnormal karyotype, including 329 patients (13.6%) with intermediate and 83 patients (3.4%) with adverse-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3 -ITD neg/low AML, adverse cytogenetics were associated with lower complete remission rates (87.7%, 86.0%, and 66.3% for normal, aberrant intermediate, and adverse karyotype, respectively; P < .001), inferior 5-year overall (52.4%, 44.8%, 19.5%, respectively; P < .001) and event-free survival (40.6%, 36.0%, 18.1%, respectively; P < .001), and a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (43.6%, 44.2%, 51.9%, respectively; P = .0012). These associations remained in multivariable mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for known clinicopathologic risk factors ( P < .001 for all end points). In patients with adverse-risk chromosomal aberrations, we found no significant influence of the NPM1 mutational status on outcome., Conclusion: Karyotype abnormalities are significantly associated with outcome in NPM1 mut / FLT3 -ITD neg/low AML. When adverse-risk cytogenetics are present, patients with NPM1 mut share the same unfavorable prognosis as patients with NPM1 wild type and should be classified and treated accordingly. Thus, cytogenetic risk predominates over molecular risk in NPM1 mut / FLT3 -ITD neg/low AML.

Background: Outcome of patients with mutation of the FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain (FLT3-TKD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial., Patients and Methods: Herein, we present a retrospective study of 126 newly diagnosed patients with AML performed in 2 French centers., Results: FLT3-TKD mutations represented 12.7% of patients, whereas FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation was observed in 20.6% of AML cases and 1.6% of patients harbored both anomalies. At diagnosis, FLT3-TKD and FLT3-ITD were associated with higher peripheral leukocytes count and a higher blast count in bone marrow (P < 10 -4 ). Mutations of the NPM1 gene were frequently associated to FLT3-TKD (68.7%) and FLT3-ITD (61.5%) mutations compared with FLT3 wild type (WT) patients (P < 10 -4 ). Patients with both FLT3-TKD and NPM1 mutations (n = 12; 9.5%) showed a favorable outcome. Interestingly, mutations in NPM1 gene lost their favorable prognostic when not associated with FLT3-TKD both in univariate and multivariate analyses., Conclusion: Our data suggest that FLT3-TKD mutations should be routinely determined at the time of diagnosis. In association with NPM1 mutations, patients should follow the therapeutic schedule of favorable-risk patients with AML., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains among the most frequent malignancies in persons living with HIV (PLWHIV). Survival among patients with HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most frequent NHL subtype, has improved markedly in recent years. We aimed to analyze characteristics and outcomes of DLBCL in HIV-infected patients in the era of modern combined antiretroviral therapy (cART)., Design: PLWHIV with lymphoma were prospectively enrolled in the French ANRS-CO16 Lymphovir cohort between 2008 and 2015. We compared the patients treated with R-CHOP) (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vin-cristine, prednisolone) with HIV-negative DLBCL patients enrolled simultaneously in the R-CHOP arms of Lymphoma Study Association trials., Results: Among 110 PLWHIV with NHL, 52 (47%) had systemic DLBCL. These 52 cases had frequent extranodal disease (81%), poor performance status (35%) and advanced age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI) (58%), and were mainly treated with R-CHOP (n = 44, 85%). Their median CD4 T-cell count was 233 cells/μl, and 79% of patients were on cART. The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were both 75% (95% confidence interval: 64%, 88%). Factors associated with progression or death in univariate analysis were poor performance status [hazard ratio: 3.3 (1.2, 8.9)], more than one extranodal site [hazard ratio: 3.4 (1.1, 10.5)] and an advanced aaIPI [hazard ratio: 3.7 (1.0, 13.1)]. Progression-free survival after R-CHOP therapy did not differ from that of the HIV-negative counterparts (P = 0.11)., Conclusion: In the recent cART era, despite frequent high-risk features, the 2-year overall survival of HIV-DLBCL patients reaches 75%. Outcomes after R-CHOP therapy are similar to those of HIV-negative patients with similar aaIPI.

Long non-coding RNAs are defined as transcripts larger than 200 nucleotides but without protein-coding potential. There is growing evidence of the important role of long non-coding RNAs in cancer initiation, development and progression. In this study, we sought to evaluate the long non-coding RNA expression profile of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RNA-sequencing of 40 cytogenetically normal AML patients allowed us to quantify 11,036 long non-coding RNAs. Among these, more than 8000 were previously undescribed long non-coding RNAs. Using unsupervised analysis, we observed a specific long non-coding RNA expression profile dependent on the mutational status of the NPM1 gene. Statistical analysis allowed us to identify a minimal set of 12 long non-coding RNAs capable of discriminating NPM1 -mutated from NPM1 -wild-type patients. These results were validated by qRT-PCR on an independent cohort composed of 134 cytogenetically normal AML patients. Furthermore, we have identified one putative biomarker, the long non-coding RNA XLOC&#95;109948 whose expression pattern predicts clinical outcome. Interestingly, low XLOC&#95;109948 expression indicates a good prognosis especially for NPM1 -mutated patients. Transient transfection of GapmeR against XLOC&#95;109948 in NPM1 -mutated OCI-AML3 cell line treated with Ara-C or ATRA enhances apoptosis suggesting XLOC&#95;109948 plays a role in drug sensitivity. This study improves our knowledge of the long non-coding RNA transcriptome in cytogenetically normal AML patients. We observed a distinct long non-coding RNA expression profile in patients with the NPM1 mutation. The newly identified XLOC&#95;109948 long non-coding RNA emerged as a strong prognostic factor able to better stratify NPM1-mutated patients., (Copyright© 2017 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)