Search

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibits a proclivity for early recurrence and development of metastasis. Moreover, drug resistance tends to arise few months following chemotherapeutic regimen with agents such as Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, and Cisplatin. miR-200 family and miR-205 are considered key regulators of metastasis by regulating the Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) via inhibiting ZEB1. Therefore, these microRNAs may offer therapeutic applications. Moreover, they hold potential for inhibiting chemoresistance and increasing chemosensitivity. These microRNAs are suppressed in TNBC cells. Increasing their levels, however, can inhibit EMT and improve progression-free survival (PFS). Besides using direct miRNA therapy via viral vectors, some drugs like Acetaminophen, or Tamoxifen are deemed useful for TNBC due to their ability to upregulate these miRNAs. In this review, by conducting an advanced search on PubMed, Embase, and Medline and selecting pertinent studies, we aimed to explore the potential applications of these microRNAs in controlling EMT and overcoming chemoresistance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Mario Giuliano declared advisor/consultant role for Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen. Francesco Schettini declares no competing financial and non-financial interests but reports personal fees from Novartis for educational activities. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Positional plagiocephaly is an asymmetrical flattened skull deformity whose incidence increased significantly in the last decades. Osteopathic treatment has been suggested to tackle early deformational sequences, in order to ensure the correct development of the child. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of osteopathic treatment of positional cranial deformities in infants., Methods: Retrospective observational study carried out at the Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine of University of Bari, Italy in collaboration with a specialized pediatric osteopath., Results: 424 infants were enrolled. Isolated positional plagiocephaly affected the vast majority of infants (n. 390, 91.98%); 34 patients (8.02%) were diagnosed with positional brachycephaly. Both infant groups (positional plagiocephaly and positional brachycephaly) had a median severity score of 3 (IQR: 3 - 3 and 2 - 3, respectively) and benefited from a median of 3 osteopathic sessions (IQR 3-4 and 2-4, respectively). Higher severity scores of positional asymmetries were significantly more common in preterm neonates (Pearson chi2: 11.58; p-value: 0.021) and in males (Pearson chi2: 10.06; p-value: 0.039)., Conclusions: Significant improvements in positional cranial deformations of children were obtained after only five osteopathic treatments provided in the first months of life. The osteopathic treatment could positively impact the clinical history of patients with positional plagiocephaly and positional brachycephaly., Implication for Practice: • Positional plagiocephaly is increasingly common among infants and may cause moderate to severe neurodevelopmental adverse effects. • Osteopathic treatment may tackle early deformational sequences, in order to ensure the correct development of the child. • Our study reveals that cranial asymmetry of infants with positional plagiocephaly is significantly reduced after only five osteopathic treatments provided in the first months of life. • Osteopathic treatment should be offered as a first line approach to young infants diagnosed with positional plagiocephaly., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The incidence of breast cancer in ≤ 40 yr-old women (YWBC) has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Although this group of patients represents less than 10 % of all newly diagnosed BC cases it encompasses a significant burden of disease. Usually underrepresented in clinical trials, YWBCs are also characterized by late diagnoses and poorly differentiated, aggressive-subtype disease, partly explaining its poor prognosis along with a high recurrence risk, and high mortality rates. On the other hand, YWBC treatment poses unique challenges such as preservation of fertility, and long-term toxicity and adverse events. Herein, we summarize the current evidence in hormone receptor-positive YWBC including specific risk factors, clinicopathologic and genomic features, and available evidence on response to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Overall, we advocate for a more comprehensive multidisciplinary healthcare model to improve the outcomes and the quality of life of this subset of younger patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [BW reports travel expenses from Astra Zeneca and BMS. IGF has declared honoraria for presentations from Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Esteve, GSK; and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, and BMS. OMS has declared travel expenses and consulting fees from Roche and Reveal, and speaker fees from Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Novartis. FS reports honoraria and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy Sankyo, and advisory role for Pfizer. CS has received honorary for lectures from Roche, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, consulting/advisory role for Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD and Astra Zeneca, and travel expenses from Roche and Pfizer. MM reports grants from Novartis, Breast Cancer Research Foundation- AACR, Breast Cancer Now Career Catalyst, during the study and advisors from Novartis, Roche, Pfizer and Lilly, outside of the submitted work. FBM reports patent application (PCT/EP2022/086493, PCT/EP2023/060810, EP23382703 and EP23383369). AP has declared personal honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, MSD Oncology, Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo, travel, accommodations, and expenses paid by Daiichi Sankyo, research funding from Nanostring Technologies, Roche and Novartis, consulting/advisory role for Nanostring Technologies, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Oncolytics Biotech, Amgen, Lilly, MSD, PUMA and Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. outside the submitted work. MVL has declared honoraria for presentations from Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, and Daichii, and travel expenses from Roche and Pfizer. Additionally, she has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Novartis and Roche.], (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Recent studies have investigated the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer. However, there is an ongoing debate about the optimal approach for integrating this strategy., Objectives: To evaluate the association of neoadjuvant ICIs with pathologic complete response (pCR) across molecular phenotypes, to quantify the survival benefits of ICIs beyond pCR status, and to estimate the incidence of specific adverse events., Data Sources: The PubMed database was searched on December 10, 2023, to identify all potential eligible studies., Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed (neo)adjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy in early breast cancer., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data from the eligible RCTs were extracted by 2 reviewers. An extracted individual patient data meta-analysis and a trial-level random-effect meta-analysis were performed., Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Outcomes were pCR, event-free survival (EFS) in patients with and without pCR, and adverse events. Hazard ratios were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models., Results: Nine RCTs involving 5114 patients met the inclusion criteria (2097 triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC], 1924 hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/ERBB2-negative [ERBB2-], and 1115 ERBB2+ tumors). In TNBC, the addition of ICIs was associated with an improved pCR rate regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status (absolute improvement, >10%). In HR+/ ERBB2- tumors, the administration of ICIs was associated with improved pCR only in the PD-L1-positive (PD-L1+) population (absolute improvement, +12.2%), whereas no benefit was observed in ERBB2+ tumors. In patients with TNBC achieving a pCR, the addition of ICIs was associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.00), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 92.0% with ICIs compared with 88.0% without them. In patients with residual disease, ICIs also showed better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 63.3% with ICIs and 56.1% without them. Adjuvant ICI did not show numerical improvement in patients with either pCR or residual disease (all hazard ratios >1). During the neoadjuvant treatment, the incidence of grade 3 or greater immune-related adverse events with ICI was 10.3%., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that neoadjuvant ICI therapy improves efficacy outcomes in early-stage TNBC and PD-L1+ HR+/ERBB2- tumors with an acceptable safety profile; however, no benefit was observed with adjuvant ICI. Given the financial and toxicity costs associated with ICIs, future research should prioritize identifying patients most likely to benefit from the addition of ICIs to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: The identification of the most appropriate targeted therapies for advanced cancers is challenging. We performed a molecular profiling of metastatic solid tumors utilizing a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to determine genomic alterations' type, frequency, actionability, and potential correlations with PD-L1 expression., Methods: A total of 304 adult patients with heavily pretreated metastatic cancers treated between January 2019 and March 2021 were recruited. The CLIA-/UKAS-accredit Oncofocus assay targeting 505 genes was used on newly obtained or archived biopsies. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used where appropriate. Results were significant for P < .05., Results: A total of 237 tumors (78%) harbored potentially actionable genomic alterations. Tumors were positive for PD-L1 in 68.9% of cases. The median number of mutant genes/tumor was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-3.0). Only 34.5% were actionable ESCAT Tier I-II with different prevalence according to cancer type. The DNA damage repair (14%), the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (14%), and the RAS/RAF/MAPK (12%) pathways were the most frequently altered. No association was found among PD-L1, ESCAT, age, sex, and tumor mutational status. Overall, 62 patients underwent targeted treatment, with 37.1% obtaining objective responses. The same molecular-driven treatment for different cancer types could be associated with opposite clinical outcomes., Conclusions: We highlight the clinical value of molecular profiling in metastatic solid tumors using comprehensive NGS-based panels to improve treatment algorithms in situations of uncertainty and facilitate clinical trial recruitment. However, interpreting genomic alterations in a tumor type-specific manner is critical., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

The human body represents the habitat of trillions of symbiotic microorganisms, collectively known as human microbiota, approximately half of which residing in the gut. The development of next-generation sequencing techniques has boosted the profiling of human microbiota in recent years. A growing body of evidence seems to support a strict relationship between the disruption of the mutualistic relationship between the microbiota and the host (i.e., dysbiosis) and the development of several diseases, including breast malignancies. Breast cancer still represents the most frequent cause of cancer-related death in women. Its complex relationship with gut microbiota is the object of a growing body of evidence. In fact, the interaction with the host immune system and a direct impact of gut microbiota on estrogen, lipid and polyphenols metabolism, seem to potentially affect breast tumor development, progression and response to treatments. In this review, in an attempt to help oncologists navigating this rapidly-evolving research field, we provide an essential overview on the taxonomy, main analytical techniques and terminology most commonly adopted. We discuss what is currently known regarding the interaction between gut microbiota and breast cancer and potential efforts to harness this complex interplay for therapeutic purposes, and revise main ongoing studies. We also briefly provide an overview on breast cancer intratumoral microbiota and its potential role beyond gut microbiota., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Francesco Schettini reports honoraria from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo for educational events/materials and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo. Daniele Generali declares personal fees for educational events by Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichy-Sankyo, Roche; research funds from Astrazeneca, Novartis and LILT. The other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Breast cancer (BC) in women aged ≤40 years carrying germline pathogenetic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes is infrequent but often associated with aggressive features. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing BC has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic target but has not been characterized in this rare patient subset., Methods: Women aged ≤40 years with newly diagnosed early-stage HER2-negative BC (HER2-0 and HER2-low) and germline BRCA1/2 PVs from 78 health care centers worldwide were retrospectively included. Chi-square test and Student t-test were used to describe variable distribution between HER2-0 and HER2-low. Associations with HER2-low status were assessed with logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. Statistical significance was considered for p ≤ .05., Results: Of 3547 included patients, 32.3% had HER2-low BC, representing 46.3% of hormone receptor-positive and 21.3% of triple-negative (TN) tumors. HER2-low vs. HER2-0 BC were more often of grade 1/2 (p < .001), hormone receptor-positive (p < .001), and node-positive (p = .003). BRCA2 PVs were more often associated with HER2-low than BRCA1 PVs (p < .001). HER2-low versus HER2-0 showed better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97) in the overall population and more favorable DFS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.95) and overall survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.93) in the TN subgroup. Luminal A-like tumors in HER2-low (p = .014) and TN and luminal A-like in HER2-0 (p = .019) showed the worst DFS., Conclusions: In young patients with HER2-negative BC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs, HER2-low disease was less frequent than expected and more frequently linked to BRCA2 PVs and associated with luminal-like disease. HER2-low status was associated with a modestly improved prognosis., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used in the treatment of triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), but its use in estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive/HER2-negative BC is questioned because of the low pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. This retrospective study assessed the mRNA-based MammaTyper® assay's capability of predicting pCR with NACT, and ER, PR, Ki67, and HER2 status at immunohistochemical (IHC) through transcriptomics., Methods: Diagnostic biopsies from 76 BC patients treated at the Cremona Hospital between 2012-2018 were analyzed. Relative mRNA expression levels of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR, and MKI67 were measured using the MammaTyper® kit and integrated into a pCR score. Predicting capability of pCR and standard IHC biomarkers could be assessed with ROC curves in 75 and 76 patients, respectively., Results: Overall, 68.0% patients obtained a MammaTyper® high-score and 32.0% a MammaTyper® low-score. Among high-score patients, 62.7% achieved pCR, compared to 16.7% in the low-score group (p = 0.0003). The binary MammaTyper® score showed good prediction of pCR in the overall cohort (area under curve [AUC] = 0.756) and in HR+/HER2-negative cases (AUC = 0.774). In cases with residual disease, the continuous MammaTyper® score correlated moderately with residual tumor size and decrease in tumor size. MammaTyper® showed substantial agreement with IHC for ESR1/ER and ERBB2/HER2, and moderate agreement for PGR/PR and MKI67/Ki67., Conclusion: Overall, MammaTyper® pCR score may serve as a standardized tool for predicting NACT response in HR+/HER2-negative BC, potentially guiding treatment strategies. Additionally, it could provide a more standardized and reproducible assessment of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 status., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Francesco Schettini reports honoraria from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo for educational events/materials and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo. Daniele Generali declares personal fees for educational events by Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichy-Sankyo, Roche; research funds from Astrazeneca, Novartis and LILT. Uğur Şahin is CEO and Mark Laible is an employee of BioNTech SE. Ralph M Wirtz is an employee of STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH. The other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

This study examines the biological effects of palbociclib and ribociclib in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, pivotal to the HARMONIA prospective phase III clinical trial. We explore the downstream impacts of these CDK4/6 inhibitors, focusing on cell lines and patient-derived tumor samples. We treated HR+ breast cancer cell lines (T47D, MCF7, and BT474) with palbociclib or ribociclib (100 nM or 500 nM), alone or combined with fulvestrant (1 nM), over periods of 24, 72, or 144 h. Our assessments included PAM50 gene expression, RB1 phosphorylation, Lamin-B1 protein levels, and senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity. We further analyzed PAM50 gene signatures from the CORALLEEN and NeoPalAna phase II trials. Both CDK4/6 inhibitors similarly inhibited proliferation across the cell lines. At 100 nM, both drugs partially reduced p-RB1, with further decreases at 500 nM over 144 h. Treatment led to reduced Lamin-B1 expression and increased senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity. Both drugs enhanced Luminal A and reduced Luminal B and proliferation signatures at both doses. However, the HER2-enriched signature significantly diminished only at the higher dose of 500 nM. Corresponding changes were observed in tumor samples from the CORALLEEN and NeoPalAna studies. At 2 weeks of treatment, both drugs significantly reduced the HER2-enriched signature, but at surgery, this reduction was consistent only with ribociclib. Our findings suggest that while both CDK4/6 inhibitors effectively modulate key biological pathways in HR+/HER2- breast cancer, nuances in their impact, particularly on the HER2-enriched signature, are dose-dependent, influenced by the addition of fulvestrant and warrant further investigation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Surfactant is a well-established therapy for preterm neonates affected by respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The goals of different methods of surfactant administration are to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and the severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); however, the optimal administration method remains unknown. This study compares the effectiveness of the INtubate-RECruit-SURfactant-Extubate (IN-REC-SUR-E) technique with the less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique, in increasing BPD-free survival of preterm infants. This is an international unblinded multicenter randomized controlled study in which preterm infants will be randomized into two groups to receive IN-REC-SUR-E or LISA surfactant administration., Methods: In this study, 382 infants born at 24 +0 -27 +6  weeks' gestation, not intubated in the delivery room and failing nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) during the first 24 h of life, will be randomized 1:1 to receive IN-REC-SUR-E or LISA surfactant administration. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. The secondary outcomes are BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age; death; pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen; severe intraventricular hemorrhage; pneumothorax; duration of respiratory support and oxygen therapy; pulmonary hemorrhage; patent ductus arteriosus undergoing treatment; percentage of infants receiving more doses of surfactant; periventricular leukomalacia, severe retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis; total in-hospital stay; systemic postnatal steroids; neurodevelopmental outcomes; and respiratory function testing at 24 months of age. Randomization will be centrally provided using both stratification and permuted blocks with random block sizes and block order. Stratification factors will include center and gestational age (24 +0 to 25 +6  weeks or 26 +0 to 27 +6  weeks). Analyses will be conducted in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, utilizing a log-binomial regression model that corrects for stratification factors to estimate the adjusted relative risk (RR)., Discussion: This trial is designed to provide robust data on the best method of surfactant administration in spontaneously breathing preterm infants born at 24 +0 -27 +6  weeks' gestation affected by RDS and failing nCPAP or NIPPV during the first 24 h of life, comparing IN-REC-SUR-E to LISA technique, in increasing BPD-free survival at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age of life., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05711966. Registered on February 3, 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The characterization and comparison of gene expression and intrinsic subtype (IS) changes induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low versus HR+/HER2-0 breast cancer (BC) has not been conducted so far. Most evidence on the association of HER2 status with pathologic responses and prognosis in HR+/HER2-negative BC is controversial and restricted to NACT-treated disease. Similarly, a temporal heterogeneity in HER2 status has been described only with NACT., Methods: We retrospectively recruited a consecutive cohort of 186 patients with stage I-IIIB HR+/HER2-negative BC treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Available diagnostic biopsies and surgical samples were characterized for main pathological features, PAM50 IS and ROR-P score, and gene expression. Associations with pathologic complete response, residual cancer burden-0/I, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) based on HER2 status were assessed. Pre/post pathologic/molecular changes were analyzed in matched samples., Results: The HER2-low (62.9%) and HER2-0 (37.1%) cohorts did not differ significantly in main baseline features, treatments administered, breast-conserving surgery, pathologic complete response and residual cancer burden-0/I rates, EFS, and OS. NAT induced, regardless of HER2 status, a significant reduction of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and Ki67 levels, a down-regulation of PAM50 proliferation- and luminal-related genes/signatures, an up-regulation of selected immune genes, and a shift towards less aggressive IS and lower ROR-P. Moreover, 25% of HER2-0 changed to HER2-low and 34% HER2-low became HER2-0. HER2 shifts were significant after NACT (P < 0.001), not neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (P = 0.063), with consistent ERBB2 mRNA level dynamics. HER2 changes were not associated with EFS/OS., Conclusions: HER2-low and HER2-0 status change after NAT in ∼30% of cases, mostly after NACT. Targeted adjuvant strategies should be investigated accordingly. Molecular downstaging with current chemo/endocrine agents and immunotherapy should not rely on HER2 immunohistochemical levels in HR+/HER2-negative BC. Instead, HER2-low-targeted approaches should be explored to pursue more effective and/or less toxic dimensional downstaging., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal treatment approach for hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2-negative MBC) with aggressive characteristics remains controversial, with lack of randomized trials comparing cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6-inhibitors (CDK4/6i) + endocrine therapy (ET) with chemotherapy + ET., Materials and Methods: We conducted an open-label randomized phase II trial (NCT03227328) to investigate whether chemotherapy + ET is superior to CDK4/6i + ET for HR+/HER2-negative MBC with aggressive features. PAM50 intrinsic subtypes (IS), immunological features, and gene expression were assessed on baseline samples., Results: Among 49 randomized patients (median follow-up: 35.2 months), median progression-free survival (mPFS) with chemotherapy + ET (11.2 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7-15.4) was numerically shorter than mPFS (19.9 months, 95% CI: 9.0-30.6) with CDK4/6i + ET (hazard ratio: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.75-2.64). Basal-like tumors under CDK4/6i + ET exhibited worse PFS (mPFS: 11.4 months, 95% CI: 3.00-not reached [NR]) and overall survival (OS; mOS: 18.8 months, 95% CI: 18.8-NR) compared to other subtypes (mPFS: 20.7 months, 95% CI: 9.00-33.4; mOS: NR, 95% CI: 24.4-NR). In the chemotherapy arm, luminal A tumors showed poorer PFS (mPFS: 5.1 months, 95% CI: 2.7-NR) than other IS (mPFS: 13.2 months, 95% CI: 10.6-28.1). Genes/pathways involved in BC cell survival and proliferation were associated with worse outcomes, as opposite to most immune-related genes/signatures, especially in the CDK4/6i arm. CD24 was the only gene significantly associated with worse PFS in both arms. Tertiary lymphoid structures and higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes also showed favorable survival trends in the CDK4/6i arm., Conclusions: The KENDO trial, although closed prematurely, adds further evidence supporting CDK4/6i + ET use in aggressive HR+/HER2-negative MBC instead of chemotherapy. PAM50 IS, genomic, and immunological features are promising biomarkers to personalize therapeutic choices., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displays clinical and biological diversity. From a biological standpoint, immune infiltration plays a crucial role in TNBC prognosis. Currently, there is a lack of genomic tools aiding in treatment decisions for TNBC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a B-cell/immunoglobulin signature (IGG) alone, or in combination with tumor burden, in predicting prognosis and treatment response in patients with TNBC., Methods: Genomic and clinical data were retrieved from 7 cohorts: SCAN-B (N = 874), BrighTNess (n = 482), CALGB-40603 (n = 389), METABRIC (n = 267), TCGA (n = 118), GSE58812 (n = 107), GSE21653 (n = 67). IGG and a risk score integrating IGG with tumor/nodal staging (IGG-Clin) were assessed for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in each cohort. Random effects model was used to derive pooled effect sizes. Association of IGG with pathological complete response (pCR) was assessed in CALGB-40603 and BrighTNess. Immune significance of IGG was estimated through CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper., Findings: IGG was associated with improved EFS (pooled HR = 0.77, [95% CI = 0.70-0.85], I 2  = 18%) and OS (pooled HR = 0.79, [0.73-0.85], I 2  = 0%) across cohorts, and was predictive of pCR in CALGB-40603 (OR 1.25, [1.10-1.50]) and BrighTNess (OR 1.57 [1.25-1.98]). IGG-Clin was predictive of recurrence (pooled HR = 2.11, [1.75-2.55], I 2  = 0%) and death (pooled HR = 1.99, 95% [0.84-4.73], I 2  = 79%) across cohorts. IGG was associated with adaptive immune response at CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper analysis., Interpretation: IGG is linked to improved prognosis and pCR in early-stage TNBC. The integration of IGG alongside tumor and nodal staging holds promise as an approach to identify patients benefitting from intensified or de-intensified treatments., Funding: This study received funding from: Associació Beca Marta Santamaria, European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programs, Fundación FERO, Fundación CRIS contra el cáncer, Agència de Gestó d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fundación Contigo, Asociación Cáncer de Mama Metastásico IV, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, RESCUER, Fundación científica AECC and FSEOM., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests B. Conte reports speaker fees from Veracyte and payment for educational events from Medsite and Novartis. A. Prat reports consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Puma, Oncolytics Biotech, MSD, Guardant Health, Peptomyc and Lilly, lecture fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Nanostring Technologies and Daiichi Sankyo; patents filed PCT/EP2016/080056, PCT/EP2022/086493, PCT/EP2023/060810, EP23382703 and EP23383369; stockholder and consultant of Reveal Genomics, SL; and institutional financial interests from Boehringer, Novartis, Roche, Nanostring, Sysmex Europa GmbH, Medica Scientia Innovation Research, SL, Celgene, Astellas and Pfizer. F. Schettini has declared consulting fees from Pfizer, honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy Sankyo, and travel expenses from Novartis and Daiichy Sankyo. O. Martínez-Sáez has declared institutional grants from Roche; personal consulting fees from Roche and Reveal Genomics; honoraria for presentations by Daiichi Sankyo, Pierre Fabre, and Reveal Genomics; and travel expenses by Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, and MSD. A. Vivancos has declared institutional grants from Bristol Meyers Squibb, Incyte, and Roche; personal consulting fees from Bayer, Bristol Meyers Squibb (BMS); Guardant, Incyte, and Roche; and personal stock options from Reveal Genomics. F. Brasó-Maristany has patents filed: PCT/EP2022/086493, PCT/EP2023/060810, EP23382703 and EP23383369. J. Parker as declared individual and institutional royalties from Veracyte–Prosigna, consulting fees from Bristol Meyers Squibb, Reveal Genomics, and GeneCentric, and holds a patent for breast cancer subtyping. Additionally, he has an equity interest in Reveal Genomics. M. Vidal has declared honoraria for presentations from Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, and Daichii, and travel expenses from Roche and Pfizer. Additionally, she has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Novartis and Roche. C. Perou has declared consulting fees and personal stock options from Reveal Genomics. T. Pascual has declared consulting fees from Novartis; honoraria from Novartis, Astra-zeneca, Veracyte, and Argenetics. I. Garcia-Fructuoso has declared honoraria for presentations from Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Esteve, GSK; and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, and BMS. L. Paré has declared contract from Reveal Genomics, a HER2DX patent filed (PCT/EP2022/086493), and the TNBCDX patent filed (EP23382703.9). M. Marín-Aguilera has declared contract from Reveal Genomics. P. Villagrasa has declared contract and personal stock options from Reveal Genomics, the HER2DX patent filed (PCT/EP2022/086493), and the DNADX patent filed (EP22382387.3). G. Villacampa has received a speaker's fee from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and Pierre Fabrer, and received consultant fees from Reveal Genomics. C. Falato is currently employed in AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and aggressive brain tumor in adults. This study aims to evaluate the expression and prognostic impact of CD99, a membrane glycoprotein involved in cellular migration and invasion. In a cohort of patients with glioblastoma treated with surgery, radiotherapy and temozolomide, we retrospectively analyzed tumor expression of CD99 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for both the wild type (CD99wt) and the truncated (CD99sh) isoforms. The impact on overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and by multivariable Cox regression. Forty-six patients with glioblastoma entered this study. Immunohistochemical expression of CD99 was present in 83%. Only the CD99wt isoform was detected by qRT-PCR and was significantly correlated with CD99 expression evaluated by IHC (rho = 0.309, p = 0.037). CD99 expression was not associated with OS, regardless of the assessment methodology used ( p = 0.61 for qRT-PCR and p = 0.73 for IHC). In an exploratory analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas, casuistry of glioblastomas CD99 expression was not associated with OS nor with progression-free survival. This study confirms a high expression of CD99 in glioblastoma but does not show any significant impact on survival. Further preclinical studies are needed to define its role as a therapeutic target in glioblastoma.

Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) represents a condition mainly caused by the type 2 inflammation presence and marked by the existence of polyps within the nasal and paranasal sinuses. The standard of care includes intranasal steroids, additional burst of systemic steroids, if needed, and surgery. However, recurrence is common, especially among patients with comorbid type 2 inflammatory diseases. Recently, biological drugs, addressing the underlying cause of the disease, have been approved in Italy (dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab). A Health Technology Assessment was conducted to define multidimensional impact, assuming Italian NHS perspective and a 12-month time horizon. The EUnetHTA Core Model was deployed, using the following methods to analyze the domains: (i) literature evidence; (ii) administration of semi-structured questionnaires to 17 healthcare professionals; (iii) health economics tools to define the economic sustainability for the system. Evidence from NMA and ITC showed a more favorable safety profile and better efficacy for dupilumab compared with alternative biologics. All the analyses, synthesizing cost and efficacy measures, showed that dupilumab is the preferable alternative. Specifically, the cost per responder analysis for dupilumab, exhibiting a 67.0% response rate at Week 52, is notably economical at 14,209EUR per responder. This presents a more economical profile compared with the cost per responder for omalizumab (36.2% response rate) at 24,999EUR and mepolizumab (28.5% response rate) at 31,863EUR. These results underscore dupilumab's potential, not merely in terms of clinical outcomes, but also in terms of economic rationality, thereby solidifying its status as a valid and preferrable alternative in the management of CRSwNP, in the context of the Italian NHS.

Purpose: In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the aromatase gene might affect aromatase inhibitors (AI) metabolism and efficacy. Here, we assessed the impact of SNP on prognosis and toxicity of patients receiving adjuvant letrozole., Experimental Design: We enrolled 886 postmenopausal patients in the study. They were treated with letrozole for 2 to 5 years after taking tamoxifen for 2 to 6 years, continuing until they completed 5 to 10 years of therapy. Germline DNA was genotyped for SNP rs4646, rs10046, rs749292, and rs727479. Log-rank test and Cox model were used for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence (CI) of breast cancer metastasis was assessed through competing risk analysis, with contralateral breast cancer, second malignancies and non-breast cancer death as competing events. CI of skeletal and cardiovascular events were assessed using DFS events as competing events. Subdistribution HR (sHR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated through Fine-Gray method., Results: No SNP was associated with DFS. Variants rs10046 [sHR 2.03, (1.04-2.94)], rs749292 [sHR 2.11, (1.12-3.94)], and rs727479 [sHR 2.62, (1.17-5.83)] were associated with breast cancer metastasis. Three groups were identified on the basis of the number of these variants (0, 1, >1). Variant-based groups were associated with breast cancer metastasis (10-year CI 2.5%, 7.6%, 10.7%, P = 0.035) and OS (10-year estimates 96.5%, 93.0%, 89.6%, P = 0.030). Co-occurrence of rs10046 and rs749292 was negatively associated with 10-year CI of skeletal events (3.2% vs. 10%, P = 0.033). A similar association emerged between rs727479 and cardiovascular events (0.3% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.026)., Conclusions: SNP of aromatase gene predict risk of metastasis and AI-related toxicity in ER+ early breast cancer, opening an opportunity for better treatment individualization., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

In the last couple of decades substantial therapeutic improvements deeply influenced the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The most impactful advancements were obtained especially in the first-line setting, with the trastuzumab/pertuzumab anti-HER2 double blockade, and in the second line, with the advent of the potent antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan. Nevertheless, a careful observation of the patterns of early-progression and long-term effects on overall survival of the most novel agents and combinations, highlights the challenges represented by the emergence of therapeutic resistance and optimal drug sequencing. The integration of sequence studies, tumor-related biomarker development/implementation and understanding of primary mechanisms of resistance to novel anti-HER2 agents, will be the way to move forward to effectively tackle these novel unmet needs., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Francesco Schettini reports honoraria from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo for educational events/materials and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo. Daniele Generali declares personal fees for educational events by 10.13039/100004336Novartis, Lilly, 10.13039/100004319Pfizer, Daiichy-Sankyo, Roche; research funds from Astrazeneca, 10.13039/100004336Novartis and LILT. Fabiola Giudici has nothing to declare., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Obesity and metabolic disorders have been associated with poor outcomes in non-Mediterranean breast cancer (BC) patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic potential of anthropometric variables in patients with early BC living in Southern Mediterranean region of Italy. We enrolled 955 consecutive early BC patients treated in hospitals in Naples between 2009 and 2013 (median follow-up 11.8-year ending 15/09/2022). Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) were collected. All-cause and BC-specific mortality were calculated. At the last day of contact 208 (22%) patients had died, 131 (14%) from BC. High WC (≥ 88 cm) or WHR (> 0.85) and the MetS were significantly associated with moderately increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.39, 1.62, 1.61, respectively). A significant increased risk of BC-specific mortality was found in obese patients, in those with high WC, high WHR and those with MetS (HR=1.72, 1.71, 1.80, 1.81, respectively). Central obesity significantly increased total and BC-specific mortality particularly in pre-menopausal women and in luminal subtypes, while in post-menopause MetS was a stronger risk factor. Obesity and MetS may impair the effectiveness of BC therapies hence active lifestyle interventions are encouraged., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Treatment for HER2-positive (+) metastatic breast cancer has improved in the last decade. We analyzed treatment changes over time and their impact on patients outcomes in a real-world dataset., Methods: Data from 637 HER2+ patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled in the multicenter Italian GIM14/BIOMETA study were retrieved. Progression-free survival (PFS) over time was evaluated according to the type of anti-HER2 therapy, disease onset (de novo vs. relapsing), metastatic site, and year of treatment (2000-2013 vs. 2014-2020)., Results: Median follow-up was 64.4 months. Overall, for first-line therapies, mPFS was 16.5 vs 19.5 months for patients treated in 2000-2013 vs 2014-2020 (HR: 0.78, 95% CI:0.65-0.94, P = 0.008). mPFS improved over time in all patients except for those with brain metastasis. Interestingly mPFS was 17.4 vs13.4 months (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13-1.98, P = 0.005) in 2000-2013 and 24.4 vs 20.9 months (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.78-1.40 p = 0.77) in 2014-2020 in pts without vs with liver metastases. For second line therapies, the overall median PFS was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.31-10.97) and did not change over time., Conclusion: Median first-line PFS improved since 2014, mainly due to the introduction of pertuzumab. The outcome of patients with liver metastases appears to have improved in recent years. Patients with brain metastases had the worst PFS, which also did not improve over time., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest G.A. reports support for the present manuscript from Astra Zeneca and Istitutional Grant from Astra Zeneca; consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Seagen; personal fees for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Astra Zeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Seagen, Viatris; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Daichii - Sankyo, Roche, Novartis; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Astra Zeneca, Daichii - Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Seagen. C.B. reports personal fees for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer; personal fees for support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Novartis; personal fees for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Roche, Novartis. C.D.A. reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Seagen, and Pfizer, Advisory Board for Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Seagen, and Pfizer, support for attending meetings and/or travel AstraZeneca, Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Celgene, and Pfizer, grants (to the Institution) from Novartis. M.D.L. reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Eli Lilly, Menarini; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Gilead, Seagen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Genetic, Pierre Fabre, GSK, Exact Sciences, Tomalab, Eisai, MSD and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Seagen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, GSK, Gilead, Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD; Roche, Eisai, Exact Scences. L.D.M. reports grants to the Institution for patient enrollment in studies from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Daiichi - Sankyo, Seagen; consulting fees from Ely Lilli, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, MSD, Seagen, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Exact sciences, Ipsen, Agendia, GSK, Daiichi – Sankyo; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, Daiichi - Sankyo; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichi - Sankyo, Exact sciences, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Astra Zeneca, Agendia, GSK. M.D.M reports personal fees for Advisory boards or consultant role: Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, MSD, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Amgen, Merck, Servier and research grant to the Institution: Tesaro, GlaxoSmithKline. A.F. reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead; support for attending meetings and/or travel for Astra Zeneca, Roche, Gilead, Eli Lilly; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Dompè, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Sophos, Epionpharma, Gilead, Seagen, Astra Zeneca, Exact Science. M.G. reports consulting fees from Lilly, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Gilead, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events for Lilly, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Istituto Gentili, Eisai Europe Ltd, Roche Astra Zeneca, Daiichi - Sankyo, MSD, Gilead, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. L.M. reports personal fees from MSD for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen. F.P. reports consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Daichii - Sankyo, Novartis, Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Astra Zeneca, Daichii – Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Seagen, Viatris; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Daichii - Sankyo, Roche; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Astrazeneca, Daichii – Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Seagen, Viatris. F.R reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Astra Zeneca, Roche, Gilead, Lilly; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Dompè, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Sophos, Epionpharma, Gilead, Seagen, Astra Zeneca, Exact Science. F.S. reports honoraria for presentations and educational materials from Novartis. Authors not mentioned declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6-inhibitors with endocrine therapy represent the standard of treatment of hormone receptor-positive(HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Gut microbiota seems to predict treatment response in several tumour types, being directly implied in chemotherapy resistance and development of adverse effects. No evidence is available on gut microbiota impact on efficacy of HR+ breast cancer treatment., Patients and Methods: We assessed the potential association among faecal microbiota and therapeutic efficacy of CDK4/6-inhibitors on 14 MBC patients classified as responders (R) and non-responders (NR) according to progression-free survival. A stool sample was collected at baseline and V3-V4 16S targeted sequencing was employed to assess its bacterial composition. Statistical associations with R and NR were studied., Results: No significant differences were observed between R and NR in terms of α-/β-diversity at the phylum and species level. Machine-learning (ML) algorithms evidenced four bacterial species as a discriminant for R (Bifidobacterium longum, Ruminococcus callidus) and NR (Clostridium innocuum, Schaalia odontolytica), and an area under curve (AUC) of 0.946 after Random Forest modelling. Network analysis evidenced two major clusters of bacterial species, named Species Interacting Groups (SIG)1-2, with SIG1 harbouring 75% of NR-related bacterial species, and SIG2 regrouping 76% of R-related species (p < 0.001). Cross-correlations among several patients' circulating immune cells or biomarkers and bacterial species' relative abundances showed associations with potential prognostic implications., Conclusions: Our results provide initial insights into the gut microbiota involvement in sensitivity and/or resistance to CDK4/6-inhibitors + endocrine therapy in MBC. If confirmed in larger trials, several microbiota manipulation strategies might be hypothesised to improve response to CDK4/6-inhibitors., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest FS declares travel expenses by Novartis and Gilead and personal fees for educational events by Novartis, Daiichy-Sankyo and Gilead. DG declares personal fees for educational events by Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichy-Sankyo, Roche; research funds from Astrazeneca, Novartis and LILT. GC declares reports advisory/consulting fees from Seagen, Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre and Gilead, and fees for non-CME services (e.g. speakers' bureaus) from Eli Lilly, Pfizer Inc and Daiichi Sankyo. The other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Preterm infants are at risk of hypoxia and hyperoxia because of the immaturity of their respiratory and antioxidant systems, linked to increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a single administration of the SLAB51 probiotic formula in improving oxygenation in respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)-affected premature babies, thus reducing their need for oxygen administration. Additionally, the capability of SLAB51 in activating the factor-erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2) responsible for antioxidant responses was evaluated in vitro. In two groups of oxygen-treated preterm infants with similar SaO 2 values, SLAB51 or a placebo was given. After two hours, the SLAB51-treated group showed a significant increase in SaO 2 levels and the SaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, while the control group showed no changes. Significantly increased Nrf2 activation was observed in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) exposed to SLAB51 lysates. In preterm infants, we confirmed the previously observed SLAB51's "oxygen-sparing effect", permitting an improvement in SaO 2 levels. We also provided evidence of SLAB51's potential to enhance antioxidant responses, thus counteracting the detrimental effects of hyperoxia. Although further studies are needed to support our data, SLAB51 represents a promising approach to managing preterm infants requiring oxygen supplementation.

Background: In clinically node-negative (cN0) early stage breast cancer (EBC) undergoing primary systemic treatment (PST), post-treatment positive sentinel lymph node (SLN+) directs axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), with uncertain impacts on outcomes and increased morbidities., Patients and Methods: We conducted an observational study on imaging-confirmed cN0 EBC, who underwent PST and breast surgery that resulted in SLN+ and underwent ALND. The association among baseline/postsurgical clinic-pathological factors and positive nonsentinel additional axillary lymph nodes (non-SLN+) was analyzed with logistic regression. LASSO regression (LR) identified variables to include in a predictive score of non-SLN+ (ALND-predict). The accuracy and calibration were assessed, an optimal cut-point was then identified, and in silico validation with bootstrap was undertaken., Results: Non-SLN+ were detected in 22.2% cases after ALND. Only progesterone receptor (PR) levels and macrometastatic SLN+ were independently associated to non-SLN+. LR identified PR, Ki67, and type and number of SLN+ as the most efficient covariates. The ALND-predict score was built based on their LR coefficients, showing an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 and an optimal cut-off of 63, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.925. Continuous and dichotomic scores had a good fit (p = 0.876 and p = 1.00, respectively) and were independently associated to non-SLN+ [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.06, p = 0.002 and aOR: 23.77, p < 0.001, respectively]. After 5000 bootstrap-adjusted retesting, the estimated bias-corrected and accelerated 95%CI included the aOR., Conclusions: In cN0 EBC with post-PST SLN+, non-SLN+ at ALND are infrequent (~22%) and independently associated to PR levels and macrometastatic SLN. ALND-predict multiparametric score accurately predicted absence of non-SLN involvement, identifying most patients who could be safely spared unnecessary ALND. Prospective validation is required., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression in breast cancer has been recently identified as a new therapeutic target. However, it is unclear if HER2-low status has an independent impact on prognosis., Materials and Methods: A systematic literature research was carried out to identify studies comparing survival outcomes of patients affected by HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer. Using random-effects models, pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the metastatic setting as well as disease-free survival (DFS), OS and pathological complete response (pCR) in the early setting. Subgroup analyses by hormone receptor (HoR) status were carried out. The study protocol is registered on PROSPERO (n.CRD42023390777)., Results: Among 1916 identified records, 42 studies including 1 797 175 patients were eligible. In the early setting, HER2-low status was associated with significant improved DFS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95, P < 0.001) when compared to HER2-zero status. Improved OS was observed for both HoR-positive and HoR-negative HER2-low populations, while DFS improvement was observed only in the HoR-positive subgroup. HER2-low status was significantly associated with a lower rate of pCR as compared to HER2-zero status both in the overall population (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = 0.001) and in the HoR-positive subgroup (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90, P = 0.001). In the metastatic setting, patients with HER2-low breast cancers showed better OS when compared with those with HER2-zero tumours in the overall population (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, P = 0.008), regardless of HoR status. No significant PFS differences were found., Conclusions: Compared with HER2-zero status, HER2-low status appears to be associated with a slightly increased OS both in the advanced and early settings, regardless of HoR expression. In the early setting, HER2-low tumours seem to be associated to lower pCR rates, especially if HoR-positive., Competing Interests: Disclosure CM reports support to attend medical conferences from Gilead and honoraria from Novartis and Lilly (all outside the submitted work). EA reports consultancy fees/honoraria from Eli Lilly, Sandoz, AstraZeneca, research grant to her institution from Gilead and support for attending medical conferences from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Genetic, Istituto Gentili, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca. GNM reports support to attend medical conferences from Roche and Bayer (all outside the submitted work). AP reports advisory and consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Puma, Oncolytics Biotech, MSD, Guardant Health, Peptomyc and Lilly, lecture fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Nanostring Technologies and Daiichi Sankyo, institutional financial interests from Boehringer, Novartis, Roche, Nanostring, Sysmex Europe GmbH, Medica Scientia inno. Re-search, SL, Celgene, Astellas and Pfizer; and shares ownership and a leadership role in Reveal Genomics, SL. EB reports funding to her institution from Gilead Science. FS declares personal fees for educational activities from Novartis and Gilead and travel expenses from Gilead, Novartis and Daiichy Sankyo. GV received honoraria for advisory boards and consulting fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD Oncology and Pfizer. LDM reports institutional research grant from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo and Seagen, consulting fees from Eli Lilly; honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Seagen, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisa, Exact Sciences and Ipsen and support for attending meetings from Roche, Pfizer and Eisai; and fees for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, AstraZeneca and Agendia. ML played an advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD and Exact Sciences and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Libbs and Takeda and travel grants from Gilead outside the submitted work. EDA received honoraria and/or participated to advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbs and Pierre Fabre; received travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis; and received research grant to his institution from Roche/GNE, AstraZeneca, GSK/Novartis and Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Mathematical models based on partial differential equations (PDEs) can be exploited to handle clinical data with space/time dimensions, e.g. tumor growth challenged by neoadjuvant therapy. A model based on simplified assessment of tumor malignancy and pharmacodynamics efficiency was exercised to discover new metrics of patient prognosis in the OLTRE trial. We tested in a 17-patients cohort affected by early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with 3 weeks of olaparib, the capability of a PDEs-based reactive-diffusive model of tumor growth to efficiently predict the response to olaparib in terms of SUV max detected at 18 FDG-PET/CT scan, by using specific terms to characterize tumor diffusion and proliferation. Computations were performed with COMSOL Multiphysics. Driving parameters governing the mathematical model were selected with Pearson's correlations. Discrepancies between actual and computed SUV max values were assessed with Student's t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. The correlation between post-olaparib true and computed SUV max was assessed with Pearson's r and Spearman's rho. After defining the proper mathematical assumptions, the nominal drug efficiency (ε PD ) and tumor malignancy (r c ) were computationally evaluated. The former parameter reflected the activity of olaparib on the tumor, while the latter represented the growth rate of metabolic activity as detected by SUV max . ε PD was found to be directly dependent on basal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and Ki67% and was detectable through proper linear regression functions according to TILs values, while r c was represented by the baseline Ki67-to-TILs ratio. Predicted post-olaparib SUV* max did not significantly differ from original post-olaparib SUV max in the overall, gBRCA-mutant and gBRCA-wild-type subpopulations (p > 0.05 in all cases), showing strong positive correlation (r = 0.9 and rho = 0.9, p < 0.0001 both). A model of simplified tumor dynamics was exercised to effectively produce an upfront prediction of efficacy of 3-week neoadjuvant olaparib in terms of SUV max . Prospective evaluation in independent cohorts and correlation of these outcomes with more recognized efficacy endpoints is now warranted for model confirmation and tailoring of escalated/de-escalated therapeutic strategies for early-TNBC patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: In hormone receptor-positive (HoR+) breast cancer (BC), gene expression analysis identifies luminal A (LumA), luminal B (LumB), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched (HER2-E), basal-like (BL) intrinsic subtypes and a normal-like group. This classification has an established prognostic value in early-stage HoR+ BC. Here, we carried out a trial-level meta-analysis to determine the prognostic ability of subtypes in metastatic BC (MBC)., Materials and Methods: We systematically reviewed all the available prospective phase II/III trials in HoR+ MBC where subtype was assessed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) of the LumA subtype compared to non-LumA. Secondary endpoints were PFS/TTP of each individual subtype, according to treatment, menopausal and HER2 status and overall survival (OS). The random-effect model was applied, and heterogeneity assessed through Cochran's Q and I 2 . Threshold for significance was set at P < 0.05. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021255769)., Results: Seven studies were included (2536 patients). Non-LumA represented 55.2% and was associated with worse PFS/TTP than LumA [hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, P < 0.001, I 2  = 61%], independently of clinical HER2 status [P subgroup difference (P sub ) = 0.16], systemic treatment (P sub  = 0.96) and menopausal status (P sub  = 0.12). Non-LumA tumors also showed worse OS (HR 2.00, P < 0.001, I 2  = 65%), with significantly different outcomes for LumB (PFS/TTP HR 1.46; OS HR 1.41), HER2-E (PFS/TTP HR 2.39; OS HR 2.08) and BL (PFS/TTP HR 2.67; OS HR 3.26), separately (PFS/TTP P sub  = 0.01; OS P sub  = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses supported the main result. No publication bias was observed., Conclusions: In HoR+ MBC, non-LumA disease is associated with poorer PFS/TTP and OS than LumA, independently of HER2, treatment and menopausal status. Future trials in HoR+ MBC should consider this clinically relevant biological classification., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of cancer. However, optimal patient selection is still an unmet need. One-hundred-forty-six patients with metastatic cancer candidates to ICI at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona Clinical Trials Unit were prospectively recruited in this observational study. Blood samples were collected at different timepoints, baseline LIPI score calculated and pre-ICI archived tissues retrieved to evaluate PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD1 mRNA levels. Tumor assessments were centrally reviewed by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Associations with overall response rates (ORR), durable clinical benefit (DCB), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed with univariable/multivariable logistic and Cox regressions, where appropriate. At a median follow-up of 26.9 months, median PFS and OS were 2.7 and 12.9 months. Response rates were 17.8% with duration of response (DOR) of 4.4 months. LIPI score was independently associated with PFS (p = 0.025) and OS (p < 0.001). Immunotherapy-naïve status was independently associated with better PFS (p = 0.005). Time-to-best response (TTBR) and ORR (p < 0.001 both) were associated with better OS at univariate analysis. PFS and DOR were moderately correlated with OS (p < 0.001 both). A PD-L1 10% cut-off detected worse/best responders in terms of ORR (univariate p = 0.011, multivariate p = 0.028) and DCB (univariate p = 0.043). PD1 mRNA levels were strikingly associated to complete responses (p = 0.021). To resume, in our prospective observational pan-cancer study, baseline LIPI score, immunotherapy-naïve status, cancer type and RT before starting ICI were the most relevant clinical factors independently correlated with immunotherapy outcomes. Longer TTBR seemed to associate with better survival, while PD1 mRNA and PD-L1 protein levels might be tumor-agnostic predictive factors of response to ICI and should be furtherly explored., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

To date, at least 2.41 billion people with Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) are in need of rehabilitation. Rehabilitation care through innovative technologies is the ideal candidate to reach all people with NCDs in need. To obtain these innovative solutions available in the public health system calls for a rigorous multidimensional evaluation that, with an articulated approach, is carried out through the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodology. In this context, the aim of the present paper is to illustrate how the Smart&TouchID (STID) model addresses the need to incorporate patients' evaluations into a multidimensional technology assessment framework by presenting a feasibility study of model application with regard to the rehabilitation experiences of people living with NCDs. After sketching out the STID model's vision and operational process, preliminary evidence on the experiences and attitudes of patients and citizens on rehabilitation care will be described and discussed, showing how they operate, enabling the co-design of technological solutions with a multi-stakeholder approach. Implications for public health are discussed including the view on the STID model as a tool to be integrated into public health governance strategies aimed at tuning the agenda-setting of innovation in rehabilitation care through a participatory methodology.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder with multifactorial etiology, characterized by impairment in two main functional areas: (1) communication and social interactions, and (2) skills, interests and activities. ASD patients often suffer from gastrointestinal symptoms associated with dysbiotic states and a "leaky gut." A key role in the pathogenesis of ASD has been attributed to the gut microbiota, as it influences central nervous system development and neuropsychological and gastrointestinal homeostasis through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. A state of dysbiosis with a reduction in the Bacteroidetes / Firmicutes ratio and Bacteroidetes level and other imbalances is common in ASD. In recent decades, many authors have tried to study and identify the microbial signature of ASD through in vivo and ex vivo studies. In this regard, the advent of metabolomics has also been of great help. Based on these data, several therapeutic strategies, primarily the use of probiotics, are investigated to improve the symptoms of ASD through the modulation of the microbiota. However, although the results are promising, the heterogeneity of the studies precludes concrete evidence. The aim of this review is to explore the role of intestinal barrier dysfunction, the gut-brain axis and microbiota alterations in ASD and the possible role of probiotic supplementation in these patients.

In advanced HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, the new antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan is more effective compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). However, trastuzumab deruxtecan can have considerable toxicities, and the right treatment sequence is unknown. Biomarkers to guide the use of anti-HER2 therapies beyond HER2 status are needed. Here, we evaluated if preestablished levels of ERBB2 mRNA expression according to the HER2DX standardized assay are associated with response and survival following T-DM1. In ERBB2 low, medium, and high groups, the overall response rate was 0%, 29%, and 56%, respectively (P < .001). ERBB2 mRNA was statistically significantly associated with better progression-free survival (P = .002) and overall survival (OS; P = .02). These findings were independent of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) levels, hormone receptor, age, brain metastasis, and line of therapy. The HER2DX risk score (P = .04) and immunoglobulin signature (P = .04) were statistically significantly associated with overall survival since diagnosis. HER2DX provides prognostic and predictive information following T-DM1 in advanced HER2+ breast cancer., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Traditionally, the classification of breast cancer relies on the expression of immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers readily available in clinical practice. Using highly standardized and reproducible assays across patient cohorts, intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer - also called "intrinsic subtypes" (IS) - have been identified based on the expression of 50 genes. Although IHC-based subgroups and IS moderately correlate to each other, they are not superimposable. In fact, non-luminal biology has been detected in a substantial proportion (5-20%) of hormone receptor-positive (HoR+) tumors, has prognostic value, and identifies reduced and increased sensitivity to endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, respectively. During tumor progression, a shift toward a non-luminal estrogen-independent and more aggressive phenotype has been demonstrated. Intrinsic genomic instability and cell plasticity, alone or combined with external constraints deriving from treatment selective pressure or interplay with the tumor microenvironment, may represent the determinants of such biological diversity between primary and metastatic disease, and during metastatic tumor evolution. In this review, we describe the distribution and the clinical behavior of IS as the disease progresses, focusing on HoR+/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. In addition, we provide an overview of the ongoing clinical trials aiming to validate the predictive and prognostic value of IS towards their incorporation into routine care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: CF declares no competing financial and non-financial interests; FS declares no competing financial and non-financial interests but reports personal fees from Novartis for educational activities; TP declares no competing financial and non-financial interests; FBM declares no competing financial and non-financial interests but reports patent application EP21383165 and patent application on DNA-based predictors of breast tumor phenotypes filed; AP declares no competing non-financial interests but reports advisory and consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Puma, Oncolytics Biotech, MSD, Guardant Health, Peptomyc, and Lilly, lecture fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Nanostring Technologies and Daiichi Sankyo, institutional financial interests from Boehringer, Novartis, Roche, Nanostring, Sysmex Europa GmbH, Medica Scientia inno. Research, SL, Celgene, Astellas, and Pfizer; a leadership role in Reveal Genomics, SL; and a patent PCT/EP2016/080056., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET) associates to satisfactory rates of breast conservative surgery and conversions from inoperable to operable hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), with less toxicities than neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and similar outcomes. Hence, it has been proposed as a logical alternative to NACT in patients with HR+/HER2- BC candidate to a neoadjuvant approach. Nevertheless, potential barriers to the widespread use of NET include the heterogeneous nature of patient response coupled with the long duration needed to achieve a clinical response. However, interest in NET has significantly increased in the last decade, owing to more in-depth investigation of several biomarkers for a more adequate patient selection and on-treatment benefit monitoring, such as PEPI score, Ki67 and genomic assays. This review is intended to describe the state-of-the-art regarding NET, its future perspectives and potential integration with molecular biomarkers for the optimal selection of patients, regimen and duration of (neo)adjuvant treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest MP, received advisory board fees from Novartis. GB received honoraria or speaker’s fee from Novartis, GSK, Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Roche and Genetic Spa. UDG received honoraria for advisory boards or invited speaker fees from Pfizer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche, Clovis, AstraZeneca, institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Roche. The other authors declare no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

During the past decades, scientists have discovered the intimate role of the gut microbiome in human health, and since then, several papers have been published to investigate if the use of biotics (probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics) may have a beneficial impact on human health both in treatment and prevention. We now ask ourselves whether we have reached the finish line or just a new starting point, as the evidence supporting the use of biotics in several conditions still needs a lot of work. Many questions remain unanswered today because the evidence differs depending on the indication, used strain, and amount and duration of administration. Herein we will summarize the evidence on probiotics in some gastrointestinal diseases such as infantile colic, functional abdominal pain disorders, celiac disease, acute gastroenteritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and Helicobacter pylori infection.

Background: Breast cancer is traditionally classified into three clinical subtypes based on hormone receptor and HER2 status (i.e., luminal-like, HER2-positive, and triple negative). Each subtype has distinct clinical-pathological and molecular characteristics and requires tailored treatments. Recent research efforts have been focusing on a new classification, identifying the so-called "HER2-low" category, including tumors characterized by a low level of HER2 expression (immunohistochemistry score 1+ or 2+ without in situ hybridization amplification). Emerging evidence shows that patients with HER2-low tumors can derive benefit from selected anti-HER2 therapies. This represents a major advancement in the field of breast oncology, where a broader proportion of patients with breast cancer can ultimately benefit from new effective targeted treatment strategies., Summary: The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan has proven impressive efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer, and several other drugs are currently under investigation in this subset of patients. Additional investigation is needed to address open issues that exist in this field, including appropriate pathological assessment of HER2-low status, clarification of its prognostic implications, and global access to newly approved drugs., Key Message: Our review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding HER2-low breast cancer, illustrating the current challenges that are being addressed and the future perspectives in this exciting new field., Competing Interests: Dr. Molinelli received honoraria from Novartis and Lilly outside the submitted work. Dr. Jacobs declares no conflicts of interest. Dr. Agostinetto received consultancy fees or honoraria from Eli Lilly and Sandoz and support to attend medical conferences from Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Genetic, Istituto Gentili (all disclosures are outside the submitted work). Dr. Marchiò received honoraria from Bayer, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. De Azambuja received honoraria and/or participated to advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbs, and Pierre Fabre; received travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis; and received research grant to his institution from Roche/GNE, AstraZeneca, GSK/Novartis, and Servier. Dr. Schettini received personal fees from Novartis for educational material. Dr. Lambertini played an advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD, and Exact Sciences and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Libbs, and Takeda and travel grants from Gilead outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is a poor prognostic disease with limited treatments and uncertain therapeutic algorithms. We performed a systematic review and multiple Bayesian network meta-analyses according to treatment line to establish an optimal therapeutic sequencing strategy for this lethal disease. We included 125 first-line trials (37,812 patients) and 33 s/further-lines trials (11,321 patients). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety, for first and further lines, separately. We also estimated separate treatment rankings for the first and subsequent lines according to each endpoint, based on (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) SUCRA values. No first-line treatment was associated with superior PFS and OS than paclitaxel ± bevacizumab. Platinum-based polychemotherapies were generally superior in terms of ORR, at the cost of higher toxicity.. PARP-inhibitors in germline-BRCA1/2-mutant patients, and immunotherapy + chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive mTNBC, performed similar to paclitaxel ± bevacizumab. In PD-L1-positive mTNBC, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy was better than atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel in terms of OS according to SUCRA values. In second/further-lines, sacituzumab govitecan outperformed all other treatments on all endpoints, followed by PARP-inhibitors in germline-BRCA1/2-mutant tumors. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low mTNBC performed similarly and was the best advanced-line treatment in terms of PFS and OS after sacituzumab govitecan, according to SUCRA values. Moreover, comparisons with sacituzumab govitecan, talazoparib and olaparib were not statistically significant. The most effective alternatives or candidates for subsequent lines were represented by nab-paclitaxel (in ORR), capecitabine (in PFS) and eribulin (in PFS and OS)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr Giuliano, Arpino and De Placido S have declared honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Amgen, and Eisai, outside of the submitted work. Dr Lambertini has declared personal fees (advisory role and/or speaker honoraria) from Roche, Takeda, Sandoz, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis Exact Sciences and Ipsen, outside of the submitted work. Dr Bartsch has declared honoraria from AstraZeneca, Daiichy Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, travel, accommodations, expenses from Roche, Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. Dr Pinato has received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare and Bayer Healthcare and travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, and Astra Zeneca; research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS, outside of the submitted work. Dr Harbeck has declared stocks and other ownership interests in the West German Study Group, honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Pfizer, Exact Sciences, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, SeaGen; consulting or advisory role for Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, SeaGen, Pierre Fabre and research funding to institution from Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, outside of the submitted work. Dr Lüftner has received honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eisai, Genomic Health, Eli Lilly, Loreal, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Tesaro, Teva, outside of the submitted work. Dr Denys has reported consulting fees (advisory role) paid to her institution by Pfizer, Roche, PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Tesaro; grants from Research Funding institutional Roche; and other fees (travel, accommodations, expenses) by Pfizer, Roche, PharmaMar, Teva, AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. Dr Zaman has reported travel, accommodation and expenses from Roche, Pierre Fabri and MSD Oncology, research funding from Roche/Genentech consulting/advisory role for Roche, Eli Lilly, MSD Oncology, Mylan, Novartis, Daiichy and Pierre Fabre, and other relationships with Pierre Fabre, all outside the submitted work. Dr Gligorov has declared speakers’ bureau honoraria from Roche-Genentech, Novartis, Eisai, Genomic Health, Ipsen, Pfizer, Mylan, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, and Pierre-Fabre; consultant/advisory board member for Roche-Genentech, Novartis, Onxeo, Daichii Sanyo, MSD, Eisai, Genomic Health, Ipsen, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Mylan, Eli Lilly, Immunomedics, Pierre-Fabre; grant support from Roche-Genetech, Eisai, Genomic Health, Pfizer, Mylan; travel, accommodation paid by Roche-Genentech, Novartis, Eisai, Genomic Health, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Pierre-Fabre; personal fees and non-financial support from Daichii Sanyo, MSD, outside of the submitted work. Dr Awada reports advisory roles, travel grants, and speaker fees from Roche, Eli Lilly, Amgen, ESAI, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Ipsen, and Leopharma. Dr Campone has declared honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, GT1, Consulting or Advisory Role from Novartis, Servier, Menarini, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Abbvie, Pierre Fabre, Accord Healthcare, Sandoz-Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Speakers' Bureau from Novartis, Amgen, Research Funding from Novartis, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Other Relationship from Roche, outside of the submitted work. Dr Wildiers has declared Consulting or Advisory Role from Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sirtex Medical, Orion Corporation, Puma Biotechnology, AstraZeneca, Biocartis, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Research Funding from Roche, Novartis, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses from Pfizer, Roche, outside of the submitted work. Dr Gennari has declared consulting/advisory role for Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, EISAI, and Daichii Sankyo; speakers bureau for Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Teva, Gentili, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, and Daichii Sankyo; research funds from EISAI, Eli Lilly, and Roche, outside of the submitted work. Dr Tjan-Heijnen has declared Honoraria and Travel expenses from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Honoraria from Daichii Sankyo, as well as Research Funding from Roche, Eisai, Pfizer, Novartis, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca and Daichii Sankyo, outside of the submitted work. Dr Cortes has declared Stock and Other Ownership Interests from MedSIR, Honoraria from Novartis, Eisai, Celgene, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Daiichi Sankyo, Consulting or Advisory Role from Celgene, Cellestia Biotech, AstraZeneca, Biothera, Merus, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, ERYTECH Pharma, Polyphor, Athenex, Eli Lilly, Servier, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Leuko, Clovis Oncology, Bioasis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Research Funding from ARIAD, Astrazeneca, Baxalta, Bayer, Eisai, Guardant Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Queen Mary University of London, Roche, Piqur, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses from Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work. Dr Del Mastro acted as a consultant for Roche, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Genomic Health, Eli Lilly, Seattle Genetics, Eisai, Pierre Fabre, and Daiichi Sankyo, received speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly and MSD, and travel grants from Roche, Pfizer and Celgene, outside the submitted work. Dr Martin has declared Honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Consulting or Advisory Role from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, PharmaMar, Speakers' Bureau from Eli Lilly/ImClone, Roche/Genentech, Pierre Fabre, Research Funding from Novartis, Roche, Puma Biotechnology, outside of the submitted work. Dr Curigliano has reported personal fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, BMS, Samsung, Astra Zeneca, Daichii Sankyo Boeringer, GSK, Seagen, non-financial support from Roche, Pfizer, grants from Merck, other from Ellipsis, outside the submitted work. Dr Jerusalem has reported grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, Roche and Pfizer, personal fees and non-financial support from Eli Lilly, Amgen, BMS and Astra-Zeneca, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Abbvie, non-financial support from Medimmune and MerckKGaA, outside the submitted work. Dr Prat reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Nanostring tecnologies, grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants from Roche, personal fees from Oncolytics Biotech, Daiichi Sankyo, PUMA, BMS, consulting/advisory role for NanoString Technologies, Amgen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb and patent PCT/EP2016/080056, outside of the submitted work. Dr Prat is also an equity stockholder, founder and consultant of Reveal Genomics and has a patent HER2DX and WO 2018/103834 licensed to Reveal Genomics, all outside of the submitted work. Dr Generali has declared Honoraria from Novartis and Eli Lilly, Research Funding from Novartis and Astra-Zeneca, outside of the submitted work. All other authors declared nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

In patients with early-stage endocrine receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC), adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for 5 years is the standard of care. However, for some patients, the risk of recurrence remain high for up to 15 years after diagnosis and extended ET beyond 5 years may be a reasonable option. Nevertheless, this strategy significantly increases the occurrence of side effects. Here we summarize the available evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety profile of extended ET and discuss available clinical and genomic tools helpful to select eligible patients in daily clinical practice.

Purpose of Review: Oral SERDs are under extensive development to overcome fulvestrant main limitations, including intramuscular-only formulation and poor performance in early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence published so far and envisions the potential integration of oral SERDs in the therapeutic algorithm of HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Recent Findings: Amcenestrant and giredestrant, two of the most promising oral SERDs, recently failed to show a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pivotal trials. Conversely, elacestrant demonstrated significant PFS superiority over standard-of-care endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant) in MBC. Additionally, it did not show unusual side effects observed with other oral SERDs, like bradycardia, hematotoxicity and vision impairment, and proved to be effective also in case of ESR1 -mutant endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Combination trials of oral SERDs with target agents, such as CDK4/6-inhibitors, are ongoing. Finally, some window-of-opportunity trials showed promising on-target activity in early-stage for this drug class., Summary: Promising results from early-phase trials are not translating into sufficient clinical benefit in pivotal trials of main oral SERDs in monotherapy, except for elacestrant. Whether oral SERDs might become the backbone for combination strategies in MBC or the preferred (neo)adjuvant endocrine agents is under evaluation., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The study aims to define the economic resources needed to manage chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), assuming the hospital perspective, based on different patient characteristics, within a 24-month time horizon., Methods: Real-world data were collected in 3 Italian hospitals. A time-driven activity-based costing approach was implemented to map and assess the pathways for CRSwNP. The following drivers were considered: diagnostic services, drugs, consumables, human resources, equipment and overhead costs based on the length of stay. Costs related to management of comorbidities and adverse events were evaluated. Three main groups of patients were identified: ineligible for surgery; having 1 intervention; having more than 1 intervention. The economic absorption of patients who continued corticosteroid treatment was analysed., Results: Patients experiencing 1 intervention had a cost of 3,453.31 € that increased to 4,705.03 € for those who required additional surgery. The cost of intranasal corticosteroids was 649.20 €, whereas the cost of oral corticosteroids was 37.60 € per patient., Conclusions: The results demonstrate the strategic relevance of analytical cost definitions of the clinical pathway for CRSwNP, which can help to support decision makers in the review of internal procedures and in the definition of proper reimbursement tariffs., (Copyright © 2022 Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy.)

Background: The study aims to describe the lingual laser frenotomy perioperative protocol for newborns with ankyloglossia with or without breastfeeding difficulties developed by Odontostomatology and Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Units of the Aldo Moro University of Bari., Methods: Authors carried out a prospective observational cohort study. Newborns with ankyloglossia (classified by using both Coryllos' and Hazelbaker's criteria) with or without difficult breastfeeding (according to Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool) underwent diode laser frenotomy (800 ± 10 nm; 5 W; continuous wave mode; contact technique; under topical anesthesia) and follow-up visits after seven and thirty days postoperatively. The authors analyzed as main outcomes the perioperative pain intensity measured by the C.R.I.E.S. scale, the occurrence of complications and quality of healing, the quality of breastfeeding, newborn's postoperative weight gain, maternal nipple pain, and the presence of lesions as secondary outcomes., Results: Fifty-six newborns were included in the current study. Intraoperative mean pain intensity was 5.7 ± 0.5 points, resolved within thirty postoperative minutes. Observed complications were mild punctuating bleeding, carbonization of the irradiated site, and transitory restlessness. All wounds were completely healed within the thirtieth postoperative day. During follow-up, a significant breastfeeding improvement was evident with satisfactory newborns' weight gain and a significant reduction of nipple pain and lesions (p < .05)., Conclusion: Our lingual laser frenotomy protocol provided significant breastfeeding improvement in the mother-newborn dyads with low intraoperative pain and no significant complications., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by the absence of hormone receptor and HER2 expression, and therefore a lack of therapeutic targets. Anthracyclines and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy have historically been the cornerstone of treatment of early TNBC. However, genomic and transcriptomic analyses have suggested that TNBCs include various subtypes, characterized by peculiar genomic drivers and potential therapeutic targets. Therefore, several efforts have been made to expand the therapeutic landscape of early TNBC, leading to the introduction of platinum and immunomodulatory agents into the neoadjuvant setting. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the currently available evidence regarding platinum agents and immune-checkpoint-inhibitors for the neoadjuvant treatment of TNBC, as well as the novel target therapies that are currently being evaluated in this setting. Taking into account the economic issues and the side effects of the expanding therapeutic options, we focus on the potential efficacy biomarkers of the emerging therapies, in order to select the best therapeutic strategy for each specific patient.

Background: Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are highly effective. Nevertheless, immunocompromised participants were excluded from randomized controlled clinical trials. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 (BNT162b2) vaccine in patients with breast and gynecological cancer treated with active anticancer therapy versus a control cohort of healthy participants., Methods: Immune responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with breast cancer ( n = 44) or a gynecological malignancy ( n = 6) on active anticancer therapy (28 on chemotherapy, mostly anthracycline- or taxane-based, and 22 on target therapy) and in a control cohort of participants without cancer ( n = 67) were investigated by SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers measured by S1-binding immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations assessed using the LIAISON XL tools (DiaSorin S.p.A.). Response was assessed after a second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine administered before and at least 3 weeks after the vaccine dose., Results: Overall, 43/50 (86%) patients of the cancer cohort (74% in the breast cancer group and 100% in the gynecological malignancy group) developed IgG antibodies after the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. There were no statistically significant differences in responder rates between patients treated with chemotherapy and those on target therapy. The majority of patients who received chemotherapy with or without target therapy, 21/28 (75%), developed a reliable antibody titer after a vaccine. All seven non-responder patients were undergoing an anthracycline-based regimen. Based on IgG levels (0-400 AU/ml), patients were classified as negative ('non-responders'), weakly positive, or strongly positive ('responders'). No delay in cancer therapy schedule or reported side effects were recorded after BNT162b2 vaccine administration. All healthy participants were strongly positive. Responder rates differed significantly between the two study cohorts (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Most patients develop antibody titers after the second immunization. However, given the persistence of non-responders or weak responders, additional immunization booster seems to be required, along with proactive planning in the vaccination schedule, with vaccine administration spaced out over time with respect to chemotherapy., Competing Interests: CD reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Seagen and Pfizer, Advisory Board for Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Seagen and Pfizer, support for attending meetings and/or travel Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Celgene and Pfizer, grants from Novartis. FS received a European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Fellowship -Translational and the 2021 BBVA Foundation/Hospital Clinic of Barcelona Joan Rodés -Jose Baselga Advanced Research Contract in Oncology. MG reports consulting or advisory Role from Lilly, Seagen, Roche, MSD, Gilead, Novartis and Pfizer, Speaker’s Bureau for Lilly, Seagen, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Pfizer, support for attending meetings and/or travel Novartis and Pfizer, Roche, grants from Novartis. RBi is on the Advisory Board for Pfizer, Astrazeneca and Novartis; GA reports personal fees from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from Roche, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Daichi, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer UM declared a shared affiliation with the authors to the handling editor at time of review., (Copyright © 2022 De Placido, Pietroluongo, De Angelis, Tafuro, Barraco, Giannatiempo, Buonaiuto, Schettini, Iervolino, Vozzella, Giuliano, Bianco and Arpino.)