1. Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in a European cohort of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CHRINOSOR).
- Author
-
Seys SF, Schneider S, de Kinderen J, Reitsma S, Cavaliere C, Tomazic PV, Morgenstern C, Mortuaire G, Wagenmann M, Bettio G, Ciofalo A, Diamant Z, Eckl-Dorna J, Fokkens WJ, Holzmeister C, Mariën G, Masieri S, Otten J, Scheckenbach K, Tu A, and Bachert C
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Chronic Disease, Middle Aged, Adult, Europe, Treatment Outcome, Cohort Studies, Aged, Quality of Life, Rhinosinusitis, Nasal Polyps drug therapy, Nasal Polyps immunology, Sinusitis drug therapy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Rhinitis drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Pivotal studies with dupilumab demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in nasal polyp score, symptom score, and quality-of-life score in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)., Objective: We evaluated the effectiveness of dupilumab in a large-scale CRSwNP cohort from 6 European tertiary-care centers., Methodology: Nasal polyp score, Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 score, visual analog scale for total sinus symptoms, loss of smell, and nasal blockage, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) score were collected from hospital records and assessed at baseline and again at 24 and 52 weeks' treatment with dupilumab in CRSwNP patients. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated in relation to demographic and lifestyle factors, sinus surgery history, presence of comorbidities, and blood eosinophil counts (BEC). Treatment response was evaluated according to European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) 2021 criteria., Results: All patient outcomes improved at 24 and 52 weeks' treatment compared to baseline. Dupilumab showed effectiveness independent of age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, prior sinus surgery, presence of asthma, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergy, or baseline BEC. A total of 92.5% and 94.4% showed an improvement in at least 1 EUFOREA criterion at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively; 54.4% and 68.2% met all 4 of the more stringent EUFOREA criteria at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively., Conclusions: Real-world evaluation of dupilumab effectiveness demonstrates a robust and sustained response in at least two thirds of patients at 52 weeks' treatment. Favorable treatment response was independent of the number of sinus surgery procedures, major comorbidities, or baseline systemic levels of type 2 inflammation., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement This study was in part financially supported by Sanofi &Regeneron. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: C. Bachert reports grants or contracts from GSK, Sanofi, Novartis, and Galenus Health. G. Bettio is an employee of Galenus Health. C. Cavaliere reports consulting fees from GSK, Sanofi, Novartis, and AstraZeneca, participation on advisory board from GSK, Sanofi, and Novartis. A. Ciofalo reports participation on advisory board and lecture from Sanofi, GSK, and Recordati. Z. Diamant reports consulting fees and/or payment for lectures from Sanofi-Genzyme, GSK, Galenus Health, Antabio, Arcede, Biosion, Foresee Pharmaceuticals, Hippo-Dx, QPS-NL, and EUFOREA; leadership role in EUFOREA (asthma expert panel chair 2020-2024); and associate editorships at Springer (MedNet), Respiratory Medicine and Allergy. J. Eckl-Dorna reports grants (to institution) from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Sanofi; payment for lectures from Allergopharma and Sanofi; and participation on advisory boards from GSK, AstraZeneca, and Bencard. W. Fokkens reports grants (to institution) from GSK, Novartis, and Sanofi; consulting fees from Dianosic, Sanofi, GSK, and Novartis; payment for lectures from Sanofi, GSK, and Novartis; participation on advisory board from Lyra; and leadership roles in the European Respiratory Society (ERS; secretary general), Rhinology (editor in chief), and Allergy (associate editor). J. de Kinderen and G. Mariën are partners and shareholders of Galenus Health. S. Masieri reports consulting fees from GSK, Sanofi, Novartis, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings from LoFarma and Sanofi; and participation on advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Novartis. G. Mortuaire reports payments for lectures from Sanofi, GSK, Novartis, Dianosic, and Medtronic; support for travel from Audika; participation in advisory boards of Sanofi, GSK, Novartis, and Dianosic; and board role in ALK. J. Otten reports grants (to institution) from GSK, Sanofi, and Novartis; and payment for lectures from Sanofi. S. Reitsma reports grants (to institution) from GSK, Sanofi, and Novartis; and advisory board fees from Sanofi, Novartis, and GSK. S. Seys is an employee of Galenus Health; and reports payment for lectures from Teva Pharmaceutical. S. Schneider reports grants (to institution), payment for lectures, and participation on advisory board from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, and Menarini. M. Wagenmann reports grants from ALK-Abello, GSK, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda; consulting fees from ALK, Genzyme, Novartis, Stallergenes, AstraZeneca, GSK, and Sanofi; payment for lectures from ALK-Abello, AstraZeneca, GSK, Leti Pharma, Sanofi, Allergopharma, Bencard Allergie, Infectopharm, Novartis, Stallergenes; and leadership role in the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI; executive committee). The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF