Search

Despite being the most important form of biotechnology in animal reproduction, artificial insemination was used in about 23% of Brazilian bovine herds in 2021. This is due to the variability of results caused by varying bull fertility and body condition of the cows. This study aimed to correlate the fertility indices of bulls with qualitative attributes of the semen. Semen samples from 28 bulls (Nellore and Angus) were used to evaluate postthaw sperm morphology and kinetics using conventional analysis, image-based flow cytometry (IBFC) and computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA). The fertility index was effective in separating bulls into 4 different fertility classes (P < 0.001), and fertility rates in timed artificial insemination (TAI) remained constant between the cows' fertility categories (P < 0.001) and in the different grades of female body condition (P < 0.005). After partial least squares regression (PLS) analysis, four models were proposed with different variables. The coefficients of determination for the conventional analysis, CASA, and IBCFC models were 0.154, 0.380, and 0.259, respectively. The composite model, including select IBFC and CASA parameters, showed a greater R 2 (0.481) with progressive motility, average speed (VAP, μm/s), membrane integrity, and mitochondrial potential, showing a positive effect. Linear speed (VSL, μm/s) and acrosomal integrity had a negative effect on bull fertility indices. Bulls classified by the fertility index attained dispersed pregnancy rates in different cow body condition score (BCS) classes, and the sperm quality pattern was consistent with this classification. In conclusion, this novel composite model including CASA and IBFC parameters improves the prediction of bull fertility used in TAI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The anthelmintic efficiency of doramectin, fenbendazole, and nitroxynil, used individually or in combination, was determined by the Fecal Egg Count Reduction (FECR) test and cultivation of larvae of anthelminthic-treated sheep grouped as follows: G1 (doramectin), G2 (fenbendazole), G3 (nitroxynil), G4 (doramectin + fenbendazole), G5 (doramectin + nitroxynil), G6 (fenbendazole + nitroxynil), G7 (doramectin + nitroxynil + fenbendazole), G8 (untreated). In addition to individually used doramectin and fenbendazole, the helminths were also resistant to the combination of doramectin + fenbendazole; nitroxynil + fenbendazole; and doramectin + nitroxynil + fenbendazole, with their FECR rates ranging from 62-83%. The helminths showed possible nitroxynil-resistance, but had low resistance when the drug was administered in combination with doramectin. The evaluation of individual helminth species revealed that fenbendazole was fully effective against Cooperia; doramectin (G1), moderately effective against Haemonchus and insufficiently active against Cooperia; nitroxynil, effective against Haemonchus and insufficiently active against Cooperia. It was concluded from the results that herd nematodes are resistant to doramectin, fenbendazole, and nitroxynil, and that the combined use of the drugs not only fails to significantly improve the anthelmintic efficiency against Haemonchus and Cooperia, but is also cost-ineffective.