Search

This MiniReview shows that both WHO and IUPHAR very early recognized that there is a gap between the availability of academic expert knowledge in pharmacology and its utilization in health care. Many initiatives have been taken to bridge this gap, but still 12 European countries do not recognize clinical pharmacology as a medical speciality because the profession has failed to develop defined functions in patient care. A first priority for EACPT therefore ought to be to promote clinical pharmacology as a medical speciality recognized by the European Union. The pharmacological services listed in Table 7 that focus on drug problems agree well with those that were recently prioritized in the IUPHAR/WHO/CIOMS manifesto to correct a major weakness in the health care of today in order to promote rational use of drugs., (© 2014 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).)

Introduction: In order to discover how well the discipline of clinical pharmacology (CP) has developed in Europe, a questionnaire survey was undertaken in 31 countries., Methods: The senior delegate of each of the 31 countries on the Council of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT) was approached personally. This study was not an official EACPT survey., Results: Based on the results of the completed survey forms, CP is recognized as an academic discipline in teaching and research fields in 28 of the 31 participating countries, but as a medical specialty in only 22 of these 31 countries. Surprisingly, France and Italy were two of the nine countries where CP was not recognized as a medical specialty. In 50 % of the countries where CP was recognized as a medical specialty, this recognition had occurred more than 30 years ago. The training of clinical pharmacologists in terms of years after internship varied between the countries. In eight countries the training was predominantly in internal medicine with shorter periods in pharmacology. In 11 countries the training was predominantly in CP, and in six countries there was dual training in pharmacology and clinical medicine. The training played a decisive role in terms of the clinical functions undertaken in health care. There was considerable variation in the numbers of clinical pharmacologists in each country, with the total figure varying between ≤ 10 to 600. In terms of the number of clinical pharmacologists per million inhabitants, nine countries have ≤ 1 (Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Turkey and UK) while four have ≥ 10 (Hungary, Norway, Slovakia and Sweden). Stumbling blocks which inhibit the development of CP as a discipline in health care are the lack of defined functions and consultant posts for clinical pharmacologists in health care in many countries and the underrepresentation of CP in pre- and postgraduate curricula., Conclusion: The majority of the responding countries suggested that EACPT should prioritize that CP becomes recognized and accredited as a European medical specialty.

The aim was to present and evaluate the impact of a comprehensive strategy over 10 years to select, communicate and achieve adherence to essential drug recommendations (EDR) in ambulatory care in a metropolitan healthcare region. EDRs were issued and launched as a 'Wise List' by the regional Drug and Therapeutics Committee in Stockholm. This study presents the concept by: (i) documenting the process for selecting, communicating and monitoring the impact of the 'Wise List'; (ii) analysing the variation in the number of drug substances recommended between 2000 and 2010; (iii) assessing the attitudes to the 'Wise List' among prescribers and the public; (iv) evaluating the adherence to recommendations between 2003 and 2009. The 'Wise List' consistently contained 200 drug substances for treating common diseases. The drugs were selected based on their efficacy, safety, suitability and cost-effectiveness. The 'Wise List' was known among one-third of a surveyed sample of the public in 2002 after initial marketing campaigns. All surveyed prescribers knew about the concept and 81% found the recommendations trustworthy in 2005. Adherence to recommendations increased from 69% in 1999 to 77% in 2009. In primary care, adherence increased from 83% to 87% from 2003 to 2009. The coefficient of variation (CV%) decreased from 6.1% to 3.8% for 156 healthcare centres between these years. The acceptance of the 'Wise List' in terms of trust among physicians and among the public and increased adherence may be explained by clear criteria for drug recommendations, a comprehensive communication strategy, electronic access to recommendations, continuous medical education and involvement of professional networks and patients.

The use of doping agents, particularly anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), has changed from being a problem restricted to sports to one of public-health concern. We review the prevalence of misuse, the evidence that some drugs improve performance in sport, their side-effects, and the long-term consequences of AAS misuse for society at large. There is substantial under-reporting of the side-effects of AAS to health authorities. We describe neuropsychiatric side-effects of AAS and their possible neurobiological correlates, with particular emphasis on violent behaviour. Analytical methods and laboratories accredited by the World Anti-Doping Agency can detect the misuse of all doping agents; although the analysis of testosterone requires special techniques, and recently discovered interethnic differences in testosterone excretion should be taken into account. The prevention of misuse of doping agents should include random doping analyses, medical follow-ups, pedagogic interventions, tougher legislation against possession of AAS, and longer disqualifications of athletes who use AAS.

Haloperidol and several other antipsychotic drugs are at least partially metabolized by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). The interindividual variation in metabolic capacity of CYP2D6 might be of importance when dosing. In this study, 26 outpatients with schizophrenia and depot haloperidol as monotherapy were genotyped. The authors found 1 patient with no functional alleles, 8 with one functional allele, 16 with two functional alleles, and 1 with three functional alleles. The daily dose of haloperidol ranged from 0.45 to 14.29 mg. Steady state plasma concentrations were measured at peak (range, 1.6-67 nmol/L) and at trough (range, 1.0-49 nmol/L). The Positive and Negative Syndrome scale for Schizophrenia and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale were used to evaluate the clinical effect. The authors found a clear correlation between haloperidol plasma concentration and number of active CYP2D6 alleles. No correlation was found between plasma concentration of haloperidol or number of CYP2D6 alleles and treatment outcome or side effects. A model to predict plasma concentration from dose and number of active CYP2D6 alleles was formed from the obtained data by means of multiple linear regression.

Since 1990, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Sweden, has created fellowships for physicians embarking upon a career in clinical pharmacology at Swedish medical schools. The fellowship has provided full salary at the level of a resident in clinical medicine for an average period of 1-2 years. Between 1992 and 2004, 22 fellows representing all six medical schools were selected for a fellowship. Of these, 20 have received specialties in clinical pharmacology, 11 now (2006) have positions as physicians in clinical pharmacology in university hospitals, 7 in the pharmaceutical industry, and 2 in a drug control agency. Two have not yet completed their training. The fellowships have been granted on the basis of excellence in clinical pharmacological problem-oriented research. The peer review of the applications has been performed by academic professors in clinical pharmacology and the chairperson of the Swedish Society of Clinical Pharmacology. The importance of having a donor with serious dedication to training and research and a scholarship organization that can prioritize these goals in an unbiased way are underlined. The Swedish MSD fellowships are a valuable complement to the resources provided by society to support the development of clinical pharmacology, i.e. the health care organizations, the faculties in medicine, and various research foundations.

Prescribed daily doses (PDDs) of antiepileptic drugs (AED) (N03A ATC group) were recorded for drugs used in monotherapy or in combination therapy in the University Hospitals in Ostrava, Czech Republic and Huddinge, Sweden. Plasma concentrations were used as an indicator of the quality of treatment. PDDs were compared with the defined daily doses (DDDs) suggested by WHO in the ATC/DDD index 2005. Request and reply forms for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were used as a source of mean PDDs. The study included 2,824 adult out- and in-patients in Huddinge treated from 1995 to 1999 and 1,268 out-patients treated in Ostrava from 1993 to 2004. The differences in PDD were tested by Student's t-test. Mean values of PDD were used when patients were examined more than once. Doses given in mono- and polytherapy were compared. Mean PDDs (in mg) in mono-/polytherapy in Huddinge and Ostrava were as follows (DDDs in parenthesis): carbamazepine 588/842 and 618/770 (1,000), clonazepam 3.0/2.5 and 3.4/2.4 (8), phenytoin 278/314 and 291/288 (300), gabapentin -/1,533 and -/921 (1,800), lamotrigine 228/228 and 216/195 (300), phenobarbital 90/75 and 183/117 (100), vigabatrin -/1,794 and -/1,259 (2,000), valproic acid 1,139/1,476 and 814/950 (1,500). The PDDs of most of the AEDs were lower than the DDDs with the exceptions for valproic acid (Huddinge, in polytherapy only), phenytoin, for which PDDs and DDDs were very close, and phenobarbital for which they were similar in Huddinge but higher in Ostrava. PDDs in monotherapy were only slightly lower than in combination therapy. Patients with plasma concentrations within the therapeutic range were usually treated with slightly higher doses than the remainder. In general, plasma concentrations tended to be in the low therapeutic range. The differences in PDDs between hospitals were significant in the case of valproic acid (P < 0.001), phenobarbital (except monotherapy within), vigabatrin, and gabapentin (P < 0.01), and carbamazepine (in monotherapy P < 0.05, polytherapy P < 0.01). Our data suggest that the DDDs of AEDs should be reconsidered as, in the majority of cases, they appear to be too high.

Plasma concentrations obtained during routine therapeutic monitoring of antiepileptic drugs (AED) (N03A ATC group) were compared in patients treated with one or several AED in the University Hospitals in Ostrava, Czech Republic and Huddinge, Sweden. Request and reply forms for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were used as a source of mean plasma concentrations (PC). The study included 2,824 adult out- and inpatients in Huddinge treated from 1995 to 1999 and 1,268 outpatients treated in Ostrava from 1993 to 2004. PC of valproic acid in Huddinge and all AED except clonazepam in Ostrava were analyzed with gas-liquid chromatography. Plasma concentrations of clonazepam in Ostrava and all AED except valproic acid in Huddinge were analyzed by HPLC. The differences in PC were tested by Student's t-test. Chi(2) method was used for the differences in the distribution of PC relative to the therapeutic window. The mean plasma concentrations generally reached the apparent therapeutic ranges but were below the range in the cases of phenytoin monotherapy in both hospitals, and clonazepam, phenobarbital and phenytoin in polytherapy in Ostrava. In monotherapy 33% of the analyses showed sub-therapeutic concentrations in Huddinge, compared to 38% in Ostrava. Eight percent of the analyses showed potentially toxic concentrations in Huddinge, but only 3% in Ostrava. The highest number of sub-therapeutic concentrations was detected for phenytoin in both hospitals: 59% in Huddinge, 78% in Ostrava. In polytherapy only slight differences between the hospitals were found. PC/dose ratios were significantly lower in polytherapy than in monotherapy for carbamazepine and valproic acid in both hospitals. In contrast a higher PC/dose ratio was found in polytherapy for phenytoin in both cohorts and for lamotrigine in Ostrava. Drug treatment of epilepsy in our two hospitals is surprisingly similar in terms of achieved plasma concentrations, in spite of socioeconomic and cultural differences between our two countries. This may be explained by the long experience with TDM in both hospitals, which has the inherent capacity to promote evidence based drug therapy.

With the support of the Swedish National Institute of Health a national information service was started in 1993 aiming to capture the abuse of doping agents in the general public. It was organized as a telephone service, called the Anti-Doping Hot-Line, from our department and managed by trained nurses co-operating with clinical pharmacologists. Important information collected about all callers (anonymous) was: date of call, its origin, category of caller, doping experience and main question being asked. Abusers were asked about their age, sex, affiliation, abused drug(s), duration of abuse, habit of administration and adverse reactions (ADRs). Between October 1993 and December 2000 25,835 calls were received with a peak during spring and autumn. Most calls (12,400) came from non-abusers, 60% being males. Callers connected with gyms represented the largest group (30%). Most calls about specific drugs concerned anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS). Other drugs or products included ephedrine, clenbuterol and creatine. The most commonly abused anabolic steroids were testosterone, nandrolone-decanoate, methandienone and stanozolol. The ten most commonly reported ADRs of AAS were aggressiveness (835), depression (829), acne (770), gynecomastia (637), anxiousness (637), potency problems (413), testicular atrophy (404), sleep disorders (328), fluid retention (318) and mood disturbances (302). Female side effects included menstruation disturbances, hair growth in the face, lower voice and enlarged clitoris. During the period 1996-200, totally 4339 persons reported about 10,800 side effects. This figure should be compared with the very low number of ADRs (27) reported by prescribers to the Swedish ADR committee during the same period. Abuse of doping agents appears to be a new public health problem that needs detection, medical care and prevention.

Background and Aim: Losartan is metabolized by polymorphic CYP2C9 to E-3174. Our aim was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 in relation to the CYP2C9 genotype., Methods: A 50-mg oral dose of losartan was given to 22 Swedish volunteers with different CYP2C9 genotypes. Losartan and E-3174 were analyzed by HPLC in plasma and urine samples collected up to 24 hours after drug intake. Furthermore, losartan and E-3174 were analyzed in 8-hour urine samples collected from 17 Spanish subjects after a single oral dose of 25 mg losartan., Results: The maximum plasma concentration of E-3174 was significantly (P <.05) lower in the CYP2C9*1/*3 (n = 5) and CYP2C9*2/*3 (n = 4) groups compared with the CYP2C9*1/*1 (n = 6) and CYP2C9*1/*2 (n = 3) groups and extremely low in 1 subject with the CYP2C9*3/*3 genotype. The ratio of the total losartan area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) to the total E-3174 AUC (AUC(losartan)/AUC(E-3174)) was higher in the subject with the CYP2C9*3/*3 genotype (30-fold) and also in the CYP2C9*1/*3 and *2/*3 groups (approximately 2- and 3-fold, respectively) compared with the CYP2C9*1/*1 group. The plasma ratios correlated significantly with the 0- to 8-hour urinary losartan/E-3174 ratios. Among the total of 39 subjects, the urinary ratio was significantly higher in subjects with the CYP2C9*1/*3 (n = 10) and *2/*3 (n = 4) genotypes than in those with the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype (n = 11; P <.01) and approximately 40-fold higher in subjects with the CYP2C9*3/*3 genotype (n = 3)., Conclusion: The CYP2C9*3 allele was shown to be associated with decreased formation of E-3174 from losartan. The significant differences between genotypes in plasma and urine losartan/E-3174 ratios and the good correlation between the plasma and urine ratios suggest that the losartan/E-3174 ratio in 0- to 8-hour urine specimens may serve as a phenotyping assay for CYP2C9 activity. Further studies in larger populations will be required to establish this.