Search

Many cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are idiopathic and clonal haemopoiesis, a risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease, may be a contributing factor to VTE. The report by Englisch and colleagues suggests that clonal haemopoiesis is a risk factor for recurrent VTE, especially in people without identifiable thrombotic predisposition. Commentary on: Englisch et al. Association of clonal hematopoiesis with recurrent venous thromboembolism: A case-control study. Br J Haematol 2024 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.19871., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The WHO and International Consensus Classification 2022 classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes enhance diagnostic precision and refine decision-making processes in these diseases. However, some discrepancies still exist and potentially cause inconsistency in their adoption in a clinical setting. We adopted a data-driven approach to provide a harmonisation between these two classification systems. We investigated the importance of genomic features and their effect on the cluster assignment process to define harmonised entity labels. A panel of expert haematologists, haematopathologists, and data scientists who are members of the International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Syndromes was formed and a modified Delphi consensus process was adopted to harmonise morphologically defined categories without a distinct genomic profile. The panel held regular online meetings and participated in a two-round survey using an online voting tool. We identified nine clusters with distinct genomic features. The cluster of highest hierarchical importance was characterised by biallelic TP53 inactivation. Cluster assignment was irrespective of blast count. Individuals with monoallelic TP53 inactivation were assigned to other clusters. Hierarchically, the second most important group included myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q). Isolated del(5q) and less than 5% of blast cells in the bone marrow were the most relevant label-defining features. The third most important cluster included myelodysplastic syndromes with mutated SF3B1. The absence of isolated del(5q), del(7q)/-7, abn3q26.2, complex karyotype, RUNX1 mutations, or biallelic TP53 were the basis for a harmonised label of this category. Morphologically defined myelodysplastic syndrome entities showed large genomic heterogeneity that was not efficiently captured by single-lineage versus multilineage dysplasia, marrow blasts, hypocellularity, or fibrosis. We investigated the biological continuum between myelodysplastic syndromes with more than 10% bone marrow blasts and acute myeloid leukaemia, and found only a partial overlap in genetic features. After the survey, myelodysplastic syndromes with low blasts (ie, less than 5%) and myelodysplastic syndromes with increased blasts (ie, 5% or more) were recognised as disease entities. Our data-driven approach can efficiently harmonise current classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes and provide a reference for patient management in a real-world setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests UG reports speaker honoraria from Novartis, AbbVie, and BMS; and institutional research support from BMS, AbbVie, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. FE reports consultancy or advisory roles for AbbVie, Incyte, Syros, Novartis, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. SH reports research support from STORM Therapeutics and AstraZeneca. EAG reports honoraria from AAMDS, MedscapeLIVE!, MediCom Worldwide, MJH Life Sciences, ASH, MDS International Foundation, and Physicians’ Education Resource; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Apellis, Takeda Oncology, Astex/Taiho Oncology, Alexion/AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Celgene/BMS, CTI BioPharma, Novartis, Partner Therapeutics, Picnic Health, and Servier; and research funding from Alexion, Apellis, Astex /Otsuka/Taiho Oncology, Blueprint Medicines, Celldex Therapeutics, Genentech, and NextCure. MAS reports participation on advisory boards for BMS, Kurome, Schrödinger, and Karyopharm. MD-C reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for BMS, Novartis, Blueprint Medicines, GSK, Agios, Hemavan, Syros, Keros, Curis, and Astex/Otsuka; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events for BMS, Novartis, and Keros. UP reports research support and honoraria from BMS, Geron, Curis, AbbVie, and Janssen. RBe reports employment or equity from Aptose Biosciences; participation on advisory boards for BMS, Servier, NeoGenomics, and Geron; being Data Monitoring Committee Chair for Gilead, Ipsen, and Keros; and consultancy for TenSixteen. YM reports honoraria from Nippon Shinyaku, BMS, Novartis, Sumitomo Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Janssen, Astellas, Pfizer, Eisai, and Otsuka; and research funding from Chugai. AED reports participation on advisory boards, consultancy, or honoraria from Celgene/BMS, Agios, Novartis, Astellas, and Gilead; and participation on clinical trial committees or data safety monitoring boards for Novartis, AbbVie, Kura, Geron, Servier, Keros, and Celgene/BMS. DPS reports employment by Ajax Therapeutics; former employment by Novartis; and minor equity in Arrowhead and Bluebird. TKK reports consultancy for Agenus and ImmunoBiome. AK reports research support from Novartis and BMS; consulting fees from Alexion, Novartis, Amgen, Agios, Pfizer, Samsung, Celgene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Sobi; honoraria from Alexion, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Samsung, Celgene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, Sobi, and Silence Therapeutics; and speakers fees from Alexion, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Celgene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Sobi. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Myelodysplastic neoplasms/syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of biologically distinct entities characterized by variable degrees of ineffective hematopoiesis. Recently, 2 classification systems (the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid tTumours and the International Consensus Classification) further subcharacterized MDS into morphologically and genetically defined groups. Accurate diagnosis and subclassification of MDS require a multistep systemic approach. The International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) summarizes a contemporary, practical, and multimodal approach to MDS diagnosis and classification., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is more common in older persons and has been associated with an increased risk of hematological cancers and cardiovascular diseases. The most common CH mutations occur in the DNMT3A and TET2 genes and result in increased proinflammatory signaling. The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study (NCT01327846) evaluated the neutralizing anti-IL1β antibody canakinumab in 10,061 randomized patients with a history of myocardial infarction and persistent inflammation; DNA samples were available from 3,923 patients for targeted genomic sequencing. We examined the incidence of non-hematological malignancy by treatment assignment and CH mutations and estimated the cumulative incidence of malignancy events during trial follow-up. Patients with TET2 mutations treated with canakinumab had the lowest incidence of non-hematological malignancy across cancer types. The cumulative incidence of at least one reported malignancy was lower for patients with TET2 mutations treated with canakinumab versus those treated with placebo. These findings support a potential role for canakinumab in cancer prevention and provide evidence of IL1β blockade cooperating with CH mutations to modify the disease course. Prevention Relevance: We reveal that administering canakinumab is associated with a decrease in non-hematological malignancies among patients with clonal hematopoiesis (CH) mutations. These findings underscore canakinumab's potential in preventing cancer and provide proof of IL1β blockade collaborating with CH mutations to enhance its clinical benefits. See related Spotlight, p. 399., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Stamp Vignettes focus on biographical details and accomplishments related to science and medicine, and not individual views and prejudices except where they had a major impact on the subject's life. The authors do not intend to imply any endorsement of such views when discussing a Stamp Vignette on Medical Science., (Copyright © 2024 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Summary: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is treatable with inhibitors of mutant IDH and also responds well to combination therapies including venetoclax, but most patients with IDH-mutant AML either never achieve complete remission or relapse because mutant hematopoietic stem cells persist despite treatment. An interesting new study in Blood Cancer Discovery characterizes a specific vulnerability in the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system in preleukemic hematopoietic stem cells from patients with IDH1 mutations that is not present in those with IDH2 mutations; will this susceptibility prove amenable to therapy? See related article by Landberg et al., p. 114 (10)., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The great pathologist Paul Ehrlich in Berlin is commonly credited with describing the first clear case of aplastic anaemia in 1888: a 21-year-old woman who presented with haemorrhage and signs and symptoms of severe anaemia, quickly succumbing to her illness. Ehrlich's description of this patient's background and clinical course allowed individual identification. Re-analysis of this case suggests an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome as a possible additional diagnosis., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: This study investigated the effectiveness of algorithmic testing in hematopathology at the Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). The algorithm was predicated on test selection after an initial pathologic evaluation to maximize cost-effective testing, especially for expensive molecular and cytogenetic assays., Materials and Methods: Standard ordering protocols (SOPs) for 17 disease categories were developed and encoded in a decision support application. Six months of retrospective data from application beta testing was obtained and compared with actual testing practices during that timeframe. In addition, 2 years of prospective data were also obtained from patients at one community satellite site., Results: A total of 460 retrospective cases (before introduction of algorithmic testing) and 109 prospective cases (following introduction) were analyzed. In the retrospective data, 61.7% of tests (509 of 825) were concordant with the SOPs while 38.3% (316 of 825) were overordered and 30.8% (227 of 736) of SOP-recommended tests were omitted. In the prospective data, 98.8% of testing was concordant (244 of 247 total tests) with only 1.2% overordered tests (3 of 247) and 7.6% omitted tests (20 of 264 SOP-recommended tests; overall P < .001). The cost of overordered tests before implementing SOP indicates a potential annualized saving of $1,347,520 in US dollars (USD) in overordered testing at Brigham and Women's Hospital/DFCI. Only two of 316 overordered tests (0.6%) returned any additional information, both for extremely rare clinical circumstances., Conclusion: Implementation of SOPs dramatically improved test ordering practices, with a just right number of ancillary tests that minimizes cost and has no significant impact on acquiring key informative test results.

Canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β (IL-1β), improved hemoglobin levels while preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in the Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS). This cardiovascular (CV) preventive effect was greater in patients with TET2 mutations associated with clonal hematopoiesis (CH). The current proteogenomic analysis aimed to understand the clinical response to canakinumab and underlying proteomic profiles in the context of CH and anemia. The analysis included 4595 patients from the CANTOS study who received either canakinumab or placebo and evaluated multiplexed proteomics (4785 proteins) using SomaScan and targeted deep sequencing for CH mutations. Incident anemia was more common in the presence of CH mutations but reduced by canakinumab treatment. Canakinumab treatment was significantly associated with higher hemoglobin increment in patients with concurrent CH mutations and anemia than patients with CH mutations without anemia or without CH mutations. Compared with those without CH mutations, the presence of CH mutations was associated with proteomic signatures of inflammation and defense response to infection, as well as markers of high-risk CV disease which was further enhanced by the presence of anemia. Canakinumab suppressed hepcidin, proinflammatory cytokines, myeloid activation, and complement pathways, and reversed pathologically deregulated pathways to a greater extent in patients with CH mutations and anemia. These molecular findings provide evidence of the clinical use of IL-1β blockade and support further study of canakinumab for patients with concurrent anemia and CH mutations. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01327846., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) at time of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been shown to be associated with decreased overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with multiple myeloma not receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD). However, the significance of CH in newly diagnosed patients, including transplant ineligible patients, and its effect on clonal evolution during multiple myeloma therapy in the era of novel agents, has not been well studied. Using our new algorithm to differentiate tumor and germline mutations from CH, we detected CH in approximately 10% of 986 patients with multiple myeloma from the Clinical Outcomes in MM to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile (CoMMpass) cohort (40/529 transplanted and 59/457 non-transplanted patients). CH was associated with increased age, risk of recurrent bacterial infections and cardiovascular disease. CH at time of multiple myeloma diagnosis was not associated with inferior OS or PFS regardless of undergoing ASCT, and all patients benefited from IMiD-based therapies, irrespective of the presence of CH. Serial sampling of 52 patients revealed the emergence of CH over a median of 3 years of treatment, increasing its prevalence to 25%, mostly with DNMT3A mutations., Significance: Using our algorithm to differentiate tumor and germline mutations from CH mutations, we detected CH in approximately 10% of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, including both transplant eligible and ineligible patients. Receiving IMiDs improved outcomes irrespective of CH status, but the prevalence of CH significantly rose throughout myeloma-directed therapy., (© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: Cancer treatment can result in burdensome toxic effects that profoundly affect patient quality of life. In seeking to emphasize the efficacy of tested treatments, clinical trial reports may use subjective or minimizing terms to describe adverse events (AEs)., Objective: To evaluate patterns of AE reporting in multiple myeloma (MM) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 2015 and early 2023., Design, Setting, and Participants: For this cohort study, the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched to assess the prevalence of minimizing terms in MM RCTs published between January 1, 2015, and March 1, 2023. Minimizing terms were defined as subjective terms used to favorably describe the safety profile of the intervention. The terms searched included convenient, manageable, acceptable, expected, well-tolerated, tolerable, favorable, and safe. Final data analysis was performed on July 21, 2023., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of at least 1 minimizing term in an article. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the presence of at least 1 minimizing term and the actual incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs, serious AEs, or grade 5 AEs., Results: Of the 65 RCTs included, 56 (86%) used minimizing terms when describing treatment-emergent AEs. The most frequently used minimizing terms were well-tolerated or tolerable in 29 trials (45%), manageable in 18 (28%), and acceptable in 16 (25%). Grade 3 or 4 AE rate in the examined RCTs ranged from 23% to 94%, with a median of 75% (IQR, 59%-82%). A univariate regression analysis demonstrated no association between the use of minimizing terms and grade 3 or 4 AE rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.35 [95% CI, 0.88-2.10] per 10% AE rate increase; P = .17) or grade 5 AE rates (OR, 3.16 [95% CI, 0.27-12.7] per 10% AE rate increase; P = .45)., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that trial investigators and sponsors regularly use minimizing terms to describe toxic effects in MM trials, and use of this terminology may not reflect actual AE rates in these studies. Instead of using these terms, trial investigators should highlight event rates and patient-reported outcomes, to allow clinicians and patients to better evaluate the true tolerability of AEs.

The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maximilian Stahl consulted for Curis Oncology and Boston Consulting; served on the advisory board for Novartis and Kymera, GSK, Rigel, Sierra Oncology; and participated in GME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media and Clinical care options (CCO). Elizabeth A. Griffiths has received honoraria for advisory board membership from AbbVie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis, Celgene/BMS, CTI Biopharma, Genentech, Novartis, Picnic Health, Takeda Oncology, Taiho Oncology. EAG has received research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech Inc., and honoraria for CME activities from Physicians Educational Resource, MediComWorldwide, American Society of Hematology, AAMDS International Foundation. Ravindra Majeti is on the Advisory Boards of Kodikaz Therapeutic Solutions, Syros Pharmaceuticals, TenSixteen Bio, Roche, and Cullgen Inc. and is an inventor on several patents related to CD47 cancer immunotherapy licensed to Gilead Sciences. R.M. receives research support from Gilead Sciences. Ravindra Majeti. is a co-founder and equity holder of Pheast Therapeutics, MyeloGene, and Orbital Therapeutics. Stephanie Halene consulted for Forma Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski is a consultant and received research funding from Kymera Therapeutics, Kurome Therapeutics, Captor Therapeutics, and Tolero Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski has equity in Kurome Therapeutics. Gail Roboz: Consultancy: Abbvie, Amgen, Argenx, Astra Zeneca, Bluebird Bio, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jasper Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Rigel, Roche, Syndax, Takeda (IRC Chair), Telix Pharma Research support: Janssen. David A. Sallman served on the advisory board of Aprea, AvenCell, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Kite, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax. David A. Sallman served as a consultant for AbbVie, Magenta, Molecular Partners AG, Takeda and on the speakers' bureau for BMS, Incyte, Servier; David A. Sallman received research funding from Aprea, Jazz. Mrinal Patnaik received research funding from Kura Oncology and StemLine Pharmaceuticals. Andrew Brunner received consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Acceleron, Agios, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Keros Therapeutics, Taiho, Gilead. Andrew Brunner has research support from the NIH SPORE in Myeloid Malignancies, and from the Edward P. Evans Foundation. Tae Kon Kim received research funding from Nextcure and is a consultant for Agenus. Alan List is employed by and has equity in Precision BioSciences, and has served as a consultant for Halia Therapeutics, CTI Biopharma, Aileron. Naval Daver has received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, Trillium, and ImmunoGen and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck labs, and Agios. Guillermo Sanz received honoraria, advisory board membership or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, ExCellThera, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda and participated in sponsored speaker's bureau for BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. Mikkael A. Sekeres has served on advisory boards for BMS, Novartis, Kurome, and Gilead. Pierre Fenaux received research funding from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Janssen. Pierre Fenaux had a consultancy with and received honoraria from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Fabio Efficace had a consultancy or advisory role for AbbVie, Incyte, Janssen, and Syros, outside the submitted work. Omar Abdel-Wahab has served as a consultant for H3B Biomedicine, Foundation Medicine Inc., Merck, Prelude Therapeutics, and Janssen, and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Envisagenics Inc., AIChemy, Harmonic Discovery Inc., and Pfizer Boulder; Omar Abdel-Wahab has received prior research funding from H3B Biomedicine and LOXO Oncology unrelated to the current manuscript. Andrew H.Wei has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Jazz, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Servier, Gilead, BMS, Shoreline, Macrogenics, Novartis and Agios; receives research funding to the Institution from Novartis, Abbvie, Servier, Janssen, BMS, Syndax, Astex, Astra Zeneca, Amgen; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Novartis, BMS, Servier, Astellas; Andrew H.Wei is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI). WEHI receives milestone and royalty payments related to the development of Venetoclax. Current and past employees of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute may be eligible for financial benefits related to these payments. Andrew H. Wei receives such a financial benefit. Amer M. Zeidan received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. AMZ participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, and Tyme. AMZ served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, BioCryst, Abbvie, ALX Oncology, Geron and Celgene/BMS. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute receives research funding for the laboratory of Dr. Hourigan from Sellas and from the Foundation of the NIH AML MRD Biomarkers Consortium. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Biological events that contribute to the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are becoming increasingly characterized and are being translated into rationally designed therapeutic strategies. Herein, we provide updates from the first International Workshop on MDS (iwMDS) of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) detailing recent advances in understanding the genetic landscape of MDS, including germline predisposition, epigenetic and immune dysregulation, the complexities of clonal hematopoiesis progression to MDS, as well as novel animal models of the disease. Connected to this progress is the development of novel therapies targeting specific molecular alterations, the innate immune system, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. While some of these agents have entered clinical trials (e.g., splicing modulators, IRAK1/4 inhibitors, anti-CD47 and anti-TIM3 antibodies, and cellular therapies), none have been approved for MDS. Additional preclinical and clinical work is needed to develop a truly individualized approach to the care of MDS patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maximilian Stahl consulted for Curis Oncology and Boston Consulting; served on the advisory board for Novartis and Kymera; and participated in GME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media and Clinical care options (CCO). Elizabeth A. Griffiths has received honoraria for advisory board membership from AbbVie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis, Celgene/BMS, CTI Biopharma, Genentech, Novartis, Picnic Health, Takeda Oncology, Taiho Oncology. EAG has received research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech Inc., and honoraria for CME activities from Physicians Educational Resource, MediComWorldwide, American Society of Hematology, AAMDS International Foundation. Ravindra Majeti is on the Advisory Boards of Kodikaz Therapeutic Solutions, Syros Pharmaceuticals, TenSixteen Bio, Roche, and Cullgen Inc. and is an inventor on a number of patents related to CD47 cancer immunotherapy licensed to Gilead Sciences. R.M. receives research support from Gilead Sciences. Ravindra Majeti. is a co-founder and equity holder of Pheast Therapeutics, MyeloGene, and Orbital Therapeutics. Stephanie Halene consulted for Forma Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski is a consultant and received research funding from Kymera Therapeutics, Kurome Therapeutics, Captor Therapeutics, and Tolero Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski has equity in Kurome Therapeutics. David A. Sallman served on the advisory board of Aprea, AvenCell, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Kite, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax. David A. Sallman served as a consultant for AbbVie, Magenta, Molecular Partners AG, Takeda and on the speakers' bureau for BMS, Incyte, Servier; David A. Sallman received research funding from Aprea, Jazz. Mrinal Patnaik received research funding from Kura Oncology and StemLine Pharmaceuticals. Andrew Brunner received consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Acceleron, Agios, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Keros Therapeutics, Taiho, Gilead. Andrew Brunner has research support from the NIH SPORE in Myeloid Malignancies, and from the Edward P. Evans Foundation. Tae Kon Kim received research funding from Nextcure and is a consultant for Agenus. Alan List is employed by and has equity in Precision BioSciences, and has served as a consultant for Halia Therapeutics, CTI Biopharma, Aileron. Naval Daver has received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, Trillium, and ImmunoGen and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck labs, and Agios. Guillermo Sanz received honoraria, advisory board membership or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, ExCellThera, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda and participated in sponsored speaker's bureau for BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. Mikkael A. Sekeres has served on advisory boards for BMS, Novartis, Kurome, and Gilead. Pierre Fenaux received research funding from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Janssen. Pierre Fenaux had a consultancy with and received honoraria from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Omar Abdel-Wahab has served as a consultant for H3B Biomedicine, Foundation Medicine Inc., Merck, Prelude Therapeutics, and Janssen, and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Envisagenics Inc., AIChemy, Harmonic Discovery Inc., and Pfizer Boulder; Omar Abdel-Wahab has received prior research funding from H3B Biomedicine and LOXO Oncology unrelated to the current manuscript. Andrew H.Wei has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Jazz, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Servier, Gilead, BMS, Shoreline, Macrogenics, Novartis and Agios; receives research funding to the Institution from Novartis, Abbvie, Servier, Janssen, BMS, Syndax, Astex, Astra Zeneca, Amgen; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Novartis, BMS, Servier, Astellas; Andrew H.Wei is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI). WEHI receives milestone and royalty payments related to the development of Venetoclax. Current and past employees of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute may be eligible for financial benefits related to these payments. Andrew H.Wei receives such a financial benefit. Valeria Santini served in advisory boards from Abbvie, BMS, Geron, Gilead,Menarini, Novartis, Servier, Syros, ad received research support from BMS. Amer M. Zeidan received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. AMZ participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, and Tyme. AMZ served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, BioCryst, Abbvie, ALX Oncology, Geron and Celgene/BMS. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute receives research funding for the laboratory of Dr. Hourigan from Sellas and from the Foundation of the NIH AML MRD Biomarkers Consortium. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is indicated for patients with higher-risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Age, performance status, patient frailty, comorbidities, and nonclinical factors (eg, cost, distance to site) are all recognized as important clinical factors that can influence HCT referral patterns and patient outcomes; however, the proportion of eligible patients referred for HCT in routine clinical practice is largely unknown. This study aimed to assess patterns of consideration for HCT among patients with HR-MDS and AML enrolled in the Connect® Myeloid Disease Registry at community/government (CO/GOV)- or academic (AC)-based sites, as well as to identify factors associated with rates of transplantation referral. We assessed patterns of consideration for and completion of HCT in patients with HR-MDS and AML enrolled between December 12, 2013, and March 6, 2020, in the Connect Myeloid Disease Registry at 164 CO/GOV and AC sites. Registry sites recorded whether patients were considered for transplantation at baseline and at each follow-up visit. The following answers were possible: "considered potentially eligible," "not considered potentially eligible," or "not assessed." Sites also recorded whether patients subsequently underwent HCT at each follow-up visit. Rates of consideration for HCT between CO/GOV and AC sites were compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis with covariates for age and comorbidity. Among the 778 patients with HR-MDS or AML enrolled in the Connect Myeloid Disease Registry, patients at CO/GOV sites were less likely to be considered potentially eligible for HCT than patients at AC sites (27.9% versus 43.9%; P < .0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with factors for age (<65 versus ≥65 years) and ACE-27 comorbidity grade (<2 versus ≥2) showed that patients at CO/GOV sites were significantly less likely than those at AC sites to be considered potentially eligible for HCT (odds ratio, 1.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.4; P = .0155). Among patients considered eligible for HCT, 45.1% (65 of 144) of those at CO/GOV sites and 35.7% (41 of 115) of those at AC sites underwent transplantation (P = .12). Approximately one-half of all patients at CO/GOV (50.1%) and AC (45.4%) sites were not considered potentially eligible for HCT; the most common reasons were age at CO/GOV sites (71.5%) and comorbidities at AC sites (52.1%). Across all sites, 17.4% of patients were reported as not assessed (and thus not considered) for HCT by their treating physician (20.7% at CO/GOV sites and 10.7% at AC sites; P = .0005). These findings suggest that many patients with HR-MDS and AML who may be candidates for HCT are not receiving assessment or consideration for transplantation in clinical practice. In addition, treatment at CO/GOV sites and age remain significant barriers to ensuring that all potentially eligible patients are assessed for HCT., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND: The hypomethylating agents are part of the standard of care in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but their role in patients with lower-risk disease is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated MDS with low/intermediate-1 risk by the International Prognostic Scoring System with a Bayesian response-adaptive design to receive either 20 mg/m2 decitabine daily or 75 mg/m2 azacitidine daily on days 1 to 3 every 28-day cycle. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were treated: 73 (65%) with decitabine and 40 (35%) with azacitidine. The overall response rate was 67% and 48% in the decitabine and azacitidine groups, respectively (P=0.042); among 59 patients with baseline transfusion dependency, 19 (32%) reached transfusion independence (decitabine, 16 of 39 [41%]; azacitidine, 3 of 20 [15%]; P=0.039). Of the 19 patients who reached transfusion independence, the median duration of transfusion independency was 22 months. Among 54 patients who were transfusion independent at baseline, 5 patients (9%) became transfusion dependent after therapy. No early death was observed. With a median follow-up of 68 months, the median overall event-free survival and overall survival were 17 months and 33 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Attenuated dose treatment of hypomethylating agents in patients with lower-risk MDS can improve outcomes without dose-limiting side effects in a high-risk cohort as defined by the Lower-Risk Prognostic Scoring System. (Funded in part by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01720225.)

Background: Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) comprise several rare hematologic malignancies with shared concomitant dysplastic and proliferative clinicopathologic features of bone marrow failure and propensity of acute leukemic transformation, and have significant impact on patient quality of life. The only approved disease-modifying therapies for any of the MDS/MPN are DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) for patients with dysplastic CMML, and still, outcomes are generally poor, making this an important area of unmet clinical need. Due to both the rarity and the heterogeneous nature of MDS/MPN, they have been challenging to study in dedicated prospective studies. Thus, refining first-line treatment strategies has been difficult, and optimal salvage treatments following DNMTi failure have also not been rigorously studied. ABNL-MARRO (A Basket study of Novel therapy for untreated MDS/MPN and Relapsed/Refractory Overlap Syndromes) is an international cooperation that leverages the expertise of the MDS/MPN International Working Group (IWG) and provides the framework for collaborative studies to advance treatment of MDS/MPN and to explore clinical and pathologic markers of disease severity, prognosis, and treatment response., Methods: ABNL MARRO 001 (AM-001) is an open label, randomly allocated phase 1/2 study that will test novel treatment combinations in MDS/MPNs, beginning with the novel targeted agent itacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, combined with ASTX727, a fixed dose oral combination of the DNMTi decitabine and the cytidine deaminase inhibitor cedazuridine to improve decitabine bioavailability., Discussion: Beyond the primary objectives of the study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of novel treatment combinations in MDS/MPN, the study will (i) Establish the ABNL MARRO infrastructure for future prospective studies, (ii) Forge innovative scientific research that will improve our understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms of disease, and (iii) Inform the clinical application of diagnostic criteria, risk stratification and prognostication tools, as well as response assessments in this heterogeneous patient population., Trial Registration: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on August 19, 2019 (Registration No. NCT04061421)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTIs) for patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) have low complete remission rates and are not curative. Early DNMTI combination clinical trials in HR-MDS are often termed "promising," but many randomized trials subsequently failed to show benefit. Clearer understanding of when a combination is likely to improve upon DNMTI monotherapy would inform randomized studies. We reviewed MDS azacitidine or decitabine monotherapy studies. We collected baseline demographics including International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk, DNMTI, disease characteristics; and response variables including survival and marrow and hematologic responses. Aggregate estimates across studies were calculated using meta-analyses techniques. Using a binomial design, we estimated the necessary operating characteristics to design a phase 2 study showing improved efficacy of a combination over monotherapy. Among 1908 patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 24% (n = 464; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.26): 267 complete response (CR, 14%), 68 partial response (4%), and 129 marrow complete remission (7%). Among 1604 patients for whom a hematologic response was reported, 476 (30%; 95% CI, 0.27-0.32) reported hematologic improvement (HI). More patients treated with azacitidine achieved HI (38%; 95% CI, 0.35-0.41) compared with decitabine (15%; 95% CI, 0.13-0.19), whereas the marrow ORR rate was higher with decitabine (29%; 95% CI, 0.26-0.33) compared with azacitidine (21%; 95% CI, 0.19-0.23). CR rates were similar between DNMTIs: 13% with azacitidine and 16% with decitabine. Variables that influence MDS response include the specific DNMTI backbone and the distribution of IPSS risk of patients enrolled on a trial. Considering these factors can help identify which early combination approaches are worth assessing in larger randomized trials., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Still, its implications for patients with indolent NHL have not been well studied. We report the prevalence of CH in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and its association with clinical outcomes. To unambiguously differentiate CH mutations from those in the WM clone, CH was defined by the presence of somatic mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, or ASXL1 (DTA) and was detected in 14% of 587 patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering WM (SWM) or WM. The presence and size of DTA clones were associated with older age. Patients with CH had an increased risk of progression from MGUS or SWM to WM, but not worse overall survival in this cohort. These findings further illuminate the clinical effects of CH in patients with indolent NHL such as WM., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) is characterized by anemia, ring sideroblast erythroid precursors, and persistent thrombocytosis. Case reports suggest lenalidomide may be effective in treating MDS/MPN-RS-T. We evaluated a large series of patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T to compare hematological improvement (HI) response rates among different drug therapies including lenalidomide. We identified 167 patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T. Among the patients tested, 84% had SF3B1 mutations and 43% had JAK2 V617F mutations. The median OS for the cohort was 81 months. Overall, 76 patients (46%) received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), 47 patients (28%) received lenalidomide, and 45 patients (27%) received hypomethylating agents (HMAs). The HI rates were 58%, 53%, and 24%, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 11 months for lenalidomide compared to 6 months for HMAs. Rates of HI improvement were higher in patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T treated with ESAs or lenalidomide, in comparison to those treated with HMAs.

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) - a biological state in which one or a small number of hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells contribute disproportionately to blood cell production, usually as a result of somatic gene mutations in the stem cells - is often considered to be a precursor to myeloid neoplasia, especially myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the majority of people with CH never develop an overt myeloid neoplasm, and CH can be a precursor to lymphoid cancers as well as myeloid neoplasms. In addition, CH increases all-cause mortality and augments the risk of several non-neoplastic medical conditions, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. CH can arise during aging, or in the context of an inherited marrow failure syndrome, aplastic anemia, or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Risk factors for progression of CH to myeloid neoplasia include larger clone size; the presence of a TP53, IDH1/2, or splicing mutation; multiple mutations; and associated cytopenias or abnormal red blood cell indices. The receipt of genotoxic chemotherapy or radiation, which can promote clonal expansion of mutant clones at the expense of healthy progenitor cells, may result in therapy-related MDS/AML., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

We conducted a phase I clinical trial of H3B-8800, an oral small molecule that binds Splicing Factor 3B1 (SF3B1), in patients with MDS, CMML, or AML. Among 84 enrolled patients (42 MDS, 4 CMML and 38 AML), 62 were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent at study entry. Dose escalation cohorts examined two once-daily dosing regimens: schedule I (5 days on/9 days off, range of doses studied 1-40 mg, n = 65) and schedule II (21 days on/7 days off, 7-20 mg, n = 19); 27 patients received treatment for ≥180 days. The most common treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. No complete or partial responses meeting IWG criteria were observed; however, RBC transfusion free intervals >56 days were observed in nine patients who were transfusion dependent at study entry (15%). Of 15 MDS patients with missense SF3B1 mutations, five experienced RBC transfusion independence (TI). Elevated pre-treatment expression of aberrant transcripts of Transmembrane Protein 14C (TMEM14C), an SF3B1 splicing target encoding a mitochondrial porphyrin transporter, was observed in MDS patients experiencing RBC TI. In summary, H3B-8800 treatment was associated with mostly low-grade TAEs and induced RBC TI in a biomarker-defined subset of MDS., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Lay Summary: People who have advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) may live longer if they get a bone marrow transplant (BMT) instead of other therapies. However, only 15% of people with MDS actually get BMT. Experts say community physicians and transplant physicians should team up with insurance companies and patient advocacy groups to 1) spread this news about lifesaving advances in BMT, 2) ensure that everyone can afford health care, 3) provide emotional support for patients and families, 4) help patients and families get transportation and housing if they need to travel for transplant, and 5) improve care for people of under-represented racial and ethnic backgrounds., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a survival that can range from months to decades. Prognostic systems that incorporate advanced analytics of clinical, pathologic, and molecular data have the potential to more accurately and dynamically predict survival in patients receiving various therapies., Methods: A total of 1,471 MDS patients with comprehensively annotated clinical and molecular data were included in a training cohort and analyzed using machine learning techniques. A random survival algorithm was used to build a prognostic model, which was then validated in external cohorts. The accuracy of the proposed model, compared with other established models, was assessed using a concordance (c)index., Results: The median age for the training cohort was 71 years. Commonly mutated genes included SF3B1 , TET2 , and ASXL1 . The algorithm identified chromosomal karyotype, platelet, hemoglobin levels, bone marrow blast percentage, age, other clinical variables, seven discrete gene mutations, and mutation number as having prognostic impact on overall and leukemia-free survivals. The model was validated in an independent external cohort of 465 patients, a cohort of patients with MDS treated in a prospective clinical trial, a cohort of patients with paired samples at different time points during the disease course, and a cohort of patients who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation., Conclusion: A personalized prediction model on the basis of clinical and genomic data outperformed established prognostic models in MDS. The new model was dynamic, predicting survival and leukemia transformation probabilities at different time points that are unique for a given patient, and can upstage and downstage patients into more appropriate risk categories., Competing Interests: Aziz NazhaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AmazonHonoraria: DCI PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Tolero PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, IncyteResearch Funding: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Rami KomrokjiStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Geron, Acceleron PharmaSpeakers' Bureau: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, AgiosTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Agios Manja MeggendorferEmployment: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory Betty K. HamiltonConsulting or Advisory Role: Syndax, Equilium Sudipto MukherjeeHonoraria: Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, McGraw-Hill Education, Partnership for Health Analytic Research, EUSA PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, CelgeneResearch Funding: Novartis, BMS (formerly Celgene)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS (formerly Celgene), Novartis, EUSA Pharma Wencke WalterEmployment: Munich Leukemia Laboratory Stephan HutterEmployment: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory Eric PadronHonoraria: Stemline Therapeutics, Blueprint MedicinesSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, Taiho PharmaceuticalResearch Funding: Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kura Oncology David SallmanConsulting or Advisory Role: Celyad, Agios, AbbVie, Aprea AB, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Intellia Therapeutics, Kite, a Gilead Company, Magenta Therapeutics, Novartis, SyndaxSpeakers' Bureau: Agios, Incyte, Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Celgene, Jazz PharmaceuticalsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Patent for LB-100 in MDS David P. SteensmaEmployment: Novartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchStock and Other Ownership Interests: Arrowhead PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Aprea AB, Celgene/BMS, H3 Biomedicine Amy DezernConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Novartis, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Celgene, Astex PharmaceuticalsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Gail RobozConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Bayer, Celltrion, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Genentech/Roche, Sandoz, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, MEI Pharma, Otsuka, Takeda, Roche, Agios, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Helsinn Therapeutics, Mesoblast, Jasper TherapeuticsResearch Funding: AbbVie, Agios, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, CTI, Karyopharm Therapeutics, MedImmune, MEI Pharma, Moffitt, Novartis, Onconova Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Tensha Therapeutics, Cellectis, Cellectis, Janssen, AmphivenaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amphivena, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, Array BioPharma, Novartis, AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Celltrion, Roche/Genentech, Sandoz, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Amgen, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Agios Guillermo Garcia-ManeroHonoraria: Celgene, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, Helssin, AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Helsinn TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Amphivena, Helsinn Therapeutics, Novartis, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Onconova Therapeutics, H3 Biomedicine, Merck Harry ErbaConsulting or Advisory Role: Agios, Astellas Pharma, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Glycomimetics, Immunogen, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Macrogenics, Novartis, AbbVie/Genentech, Janssen Oncology, Pfizer, Trillium Therapeutics, Takeda, Kura OncologySpeakers' Bureau: Agios, Celgene, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, AbbVie/GenentechResearch Funding: AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, FORMA Therapeutics, Gilead/Forty Seven, Immunogen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Macrogenics, Novartis, PTC Therapeutics, AbbVie, Glycomimetics, ALX OncologyOther Relationship: Glycomimetics, CelgeneUncompensated Relationships: Daiichi Sankyo Claudia HaferlachEmployment: MLL Munich Leukemia LaboratoryLeadership: MLL Munich Leukemia LaboratoryStock and Other Ownership Interests: MLL Munich Leukemia LaboratoryHonoraria: AstraZeneca Jaroslaw P. MaciejewskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Novartis Torsten HaferlachEmployment: MLL Munich Leukemia LaboratoryLeadership: MLL Munich Leukemia LaboratoryConsulting or Advisory Role: Illumina Mikkael A. SekeresThis author is a member of the JCO Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Millennium, Pfizer, NovartisResearch Funding: Takeda, Pfizer, Bristol Myers SquibbNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare leukemia characterized by peripheral monocytosis with no disease-modifying therapies. CMML cells are uniquely hypersensitive to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and robustly engraft in immunocompromised mice that secrete human cytokines. To leverage these unique biological features, we conducted an integrated human and murine study evaluating ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor that potently downregulates intracellular GM-CSF signaling., Patients and Methods: A total of 50 patients with WHO-defined CMML were enrolled in this open-label, multi-institution phase I/II clinical study, with a ruxolitinib dose of 20 mg twice daily studied in phase II. In parallel, 49 patient-derived xenografts (PDX) derived from 13 study participants were generated and randomized to receive ruxolitinib or vehicle control., Results: The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities observed were anemia (10%) and thrombocytopenia (6%). The clinical overall response rate was 38% by Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MDS/MPN) International Working Group (IWG) criteria and 43% of patients with baseline splenomegaly achieved a spleen response. Profiling of cytokine levels and somatic mutations at baseline failed to identify predictive biomarkers. PDX models derived from screening samples of study participants recapitulated responses seen in humans, particularly spleen responses, and corroborated ruxolitinib's clinical efficacy in a randomized murine study not feasible in human trials., Conclusions: Ruxolitinib demonstrated clinical efficacy and an acceptable adverse event profile in patients with CMML, identifying a potential novel therapeutic in this rare malignancy. Furthermore, this study demonstrates proof of concept that PDX modeling can recapitulate responses of patients treated on clinical trial and represents a novel correlative study that corroborates clinical efficacy seen in humans. See related commentary by Shastri and Adrianzen-Herrera, p. 6069 ., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Stamp Vignettes focus on biographical details and accomplishments related to science and medicine, and not individual views and prejudices except when they had a major impact on the subject's life. The authors of Stamp Vignettes do not intend to imply any endorsement of such views when discussing a Stamp Vignette on Medical Science., (Copyright © 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The presence of ring sideroblasts (RS) and mutation of the SF3B1 gene are diagnostic of lower-risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and are correlated with favorable outcomes. However, information on testing and reporting in community-based clinical settings is scarce. This study from the Connect ® MDS/AML Disease Registry aimed to compare the frequency of RS and SF3B1 reporting for patients with LR-MDS, before and after publication of the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) MDS classification criteria., Methods: Ring sideroblasts assessment and molecular testing data were collected from patients with LR-MDS at enrollment in the Registry. Patients enrolled between December 2013 and the data cutoff of March 2020 were included in this analysis., Results: Among 489 patients with LR-MDS, 434 (88.8%) underwent RS assessment; 190 were assessed prior to the 2016 WHO guidelines (Cohort A), and 244 after (Cohort B). In Cohort A, 87 (45.8%) patients had RS identified; 29 (33.3%) patients had RS < 15%, none of whom underwent molecular testing for SF3B1. In Cohort B, 96 (39.3%) patients had RS identified; 31 (32.3%) patients had < 15% RS, with 13 undergoing molecular testing of which 10 were assessed for SF3B1., Conclusions: In the Connect ® MDS/AML Registry, only 32% of patients with <15% RS underwent SF3B1 testing after the publication of the WHO 2016 classification criteria. There was no change in RS assessment frequency before and after publication, despite the potential impact on diagnostic subtyping and therapy selection, suggesting an unmet need for education to increase testing rates for SF3B1 mutations., (© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Approximately 20% of patients with TP53 -mutant myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) achieve complete remission (CR) with hypomethylating agents. Eprenetapopt (APR-246) is a novel, first-in-class, small molecule that restores wild-type p53 functions in TP53 -mutant cells., Methods: This was a phase Ib/II study to determine the safety, recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of eprenetapopt administered in combination with azacitidine in patients with TP53 -mutant MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20%-30% marrow blasts (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03072043)., Results: Fifty-five patients (40 MDS, 11 AML, and four MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms) with at least one TP53 mutation were treated. The overall response rate was 71% with 44% achieving CR. Of patients with MDS, 73% (n = 29) responded with 50% (n = 20) achieving CR and 58% (23/40) a cytogenetic response. The overall response rate and CR rate for patients with AML was 64% (n = 7) and 36% (n = 4), respectively. Patients with only TP53 mutations by next-generation sequencing had higher rates of CR (69% v 25%; P = .006). Responding patients had significant reductions in TP53 variant allele frequency and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry, with 21 (38%) achieving complete molecular remission (variant allele frequency < 5%). Median overall survival was 10.8 months with significant improvement in responding versus nonresponding patients by landmark analysis (14.6 v 7.5 months; P = .0005). Overall, 19/55 (35%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant, with a median overall survival of 14.7 months. Adverse events were similar to those reported for azacitidine or eprenetapopt monotherapy, with the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events being febrile neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (29%), and neutropenia (29%)., Conclusion: Combination treatment with eprenetapopt and azacitidine is well-tolerated yielding high rates of clinical response and molecular remissions in patients with TP53 -mutant MDS and oligoblastic AML., Competing Interests: David A. SallmanConsulting or Advisory Role: Celyad, Agios, Abbvie, Aprea AB, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Intellia Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Magenta Therapeutics, Novartis, SyndaxSpeakers' Bureau: Agios, Incyte, Bristol-Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Celgene, Jazz PharmaceuticalsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Patent for LB-100 in MDS Amy E. DeZernConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Novartis, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Celgene, Astex PharmaceuticalsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbvie Guillermo Garcia-ManeroHonoraria: Celgene, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, Helssin, AbbvieConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Helsinn TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Amphivena, Helsinn Therapeutics, Novartis, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Onconova Therapeutics, H3 Biomedicine, Merck David P. SteensmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Sage TherapeuticsHonoraria: Daiichi Sankyo, Summer Road, Stemline Therapeutics, Celgene, Astex PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Janssen Oncology, Agios, Onconova Therapeutics, Geron, Astex PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Aprea AB, Celgene/BMS, H3 Biomedicine Gail J. RobozConsulting or Advisory Role: Amphivena, Janssen, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Genoptix, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Abbvie, Argenx, Array BioPharma, Bayer, Celltrion, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Orsenix, Genentech/Roche, Sandoz, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Eisai, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, MEI Pharma, Otsuka, Takeda, Roche, Agios, Trovagene, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Helsinn Therapeutics, MesoblastResearch Funding: Abbvie, Agios, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, CTI, Karyopharm Therapeutics, MedImmune, MEI Pharma, Moffitt, Novartis, Onconova Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Tensha Therapeutics, Cellectis, Janssen, AmphivenaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amphivena, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, Array BioPharma, Novartis, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Celltrion, Roche/Genentech, Sandoz, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Amgen, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Agios Mikkael A. SekeresConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Millennium, Syros PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Takeda, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb Thomas CluzeauConsulting or Advisory Role: Abbvie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Syros PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Astellas PharmaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Kendra L. SweetLeadership: ImmtechConsulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda, Stemline TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Incyte Kathy L. McGrawResearch Funding: Genentech, Celgene Eric PadronHonoraria: Stemline Therapeutics, Blueprint MedicinesSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, Taiho PharmaceuticalResearch Funding: Incyte, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kura Oncology Greg KorbelEmployment: Aprea Therapeutics, IncLeadership: Aprea Therapeutics, IncStock and Other Ownership Interests: Aprea Therapeutics, Inc Eyal C. AttarEmployment: Agios, Aprea ABLeadership: Aprea ABStock and Other Ownership Interests: Agios, Aprea ABConsulting or Advisory Role: TeladocTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Aprea AB, Agios Hagop M. KantarjianHonoraria: Abbvie, Amgen, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Immunogen, Orsenix, Pfizer, Agios, Takeda, Actinium PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Pfizer, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, ARIAD, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Agios, Cyclacel, Immunogen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Jeffrey E. LancetStock and Other Ownership Interests: ArvinasConsulting or Advisory Role: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Abbvie, Agios, BerGenBio, Daiichi Sankyo, ElevateBioResearch Funding: Pfizer Pierre FenauxHonoraria: CelgeneResearch Funding: Celgene Alan F. ListHonoraria: Celgene, Aileron Therapeutics, Cellular Biomedicine GroupConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Aileron Therapeutics, Acceleron Pharma, International Personalized Cancer Center, Precision Biosciences, CTI BioPharma Corp, Prelude TherapeuticsResearch Funding: CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Cellular Biomedicine GroupOther Relationship: Thousand Talents Award Rami S. KomrokjiStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbvieConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Incyte, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Geron, Acceleron PharmaSpeakers' Bureau: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AgiosTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AgiosNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The hypomethylating agent azacitidine can prolong overall survival (OS) in patients with higher risk-myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) compared to conventional regimens. However, outcomes differ largely between studies, making it challenging to determine the contribution of novel therapies added to azacitidine. Further, a discrepancy is seen between complete (CR) or partial (PR) response rates and OS improvement with azacitidine, making it challenging to rely on earlier endpoints than OS. We conducted a systematic literature search and study-level systematic review of 237 clinical studies to better understand outcomes for HR-MDS patients treated with azacitidine. Pooled marrow CR was 9% (N = 2654; 95% CI: 6-13 %), CR rate was 17 % (N = 6943; 95% CI: 15-20 %), and median OS (mOS) was 18.6 months (N = 2820; 95% CI: 15.3-21.9). A weak correlation to mOS was detected with CR rate (207 patient cohorts, Pearson's r = 0.315; P < 0.0005), and a much stronger correlation with median progression-free survival (mPFS) (r=0.88, P = 3 × 10 -14 ). Six-months progression-free survival rates correlated with 1-year OS rates but were only infrequently reported (N = 41 patient cohorts) therefore not allowing a robust recommendation for a surrogate to the established OS endpoint. Larger patient numbers and patient-level data appear necessary, especially for designing future clinical trials using azacitidine combinations., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)