Search

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), TP53 mutations or deletions on chromosome 17p lead to adverse prognosis and reduced levels of miR-34a, which targets NOTCH1. Also, hyperactivated NOTCH1 signaling is crucial for CLL progression. Here we explored the interaction between p53, miR-34a, and NOTCH1 in CLL. We investigated the effect of p53 and miR-34a on NOTCH1 signaling and expression in CLL cells with altered TP53 . Our results indicate that miR-34a reduces NOTCH1 3' UTR activity but might not be a mediator between p53 signaling and NOTCH1. p53 activation increases miR-34a expression and NOTCH1 protein levels, correlating with decreased NOTCH1 and miR-34a levels in primary CLL cells with TP53 alterations. Some samples with high NOTCH1 levels presented increased BCL-2, suggesting an anti-apoptotic mechanism of a potentially direct p53-NOTCH1 relation in CLL. This study deepens the understanding of the p53-miR-34a-NOTCH1 signaling network, providing insights that could guide future therapeutic strategies for CLL.

Abstract: The T-box transcription factor T-bet is known as a master regulator of the T-cell response but its role in malignant B cells has not been sufficiently explored. Here, we conducted single-cell resolved multi-omics analyses of malignant B cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and studied a CLL mouse model with a genetic knockout of Tbx21. We found that T-bet acts as a tumor suppressor in malignant B cells by decreasing their proliferation rate. NF-κB activity, induced by inflammatory signals provided by the microenvironment, triggered T-bet expression, which affected promoter-proximal and distal chromatin coaccessibility and controlled a specific gene signature by mainly suppressing transcription. Gene set enrichment analysis identified a positive regulation of interferon signaling and negative control of proliferation by T-bet. In line, we showed that T-bet represses cell cycling and is associated with longer overall survival of patients with CLL. Our study uncovered a novel tumor suppressive role of T-bet in malignant B cells via its regulation of inflammatory processes and cell cycling, which has implications for the stratification and therapy of patients with CLL. Linking T-bet activity to inflammation explains the good prognostic role of genetic alterations in the inflammatory signaling pathways in CLL.

Long-term data of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with favorable risk who were treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) within clinical trials show good efficacy. We here report long-term data collected within the GCLLSG registry. Altogether, 417 CLL patients who received first-line treatment with FCR were analyzed, of which 293 (70.3%) were treated outside of clinical trials. The median observation time from first-line was 95.8 (interquartile range 58.7-126.8) months. Focusing on data of 194 (46.5%) patients who received FCR first-line treatment after 2013 (start of data collection within GCLLSG registry), responses were documented in 85% of the patients, non-responses in 15%, and for 3.6% the assessment was missing. Median event-free survival (EFS, time until disease progression, subsequent treatment, or death) was 60.2 months with a 5-year EFS-rate of 50.6%. Patients with higher-risk disease, characterized by unmutated IGHV (N = 78), had a median EFS of 45.4 months with a 5-year EFS rate of 36.3%, while the median EFS was 77.5 months with a 5-year EFS rate of 60.3% in patients with mutated IGHV (N = 40). Median overall survival was not reached with a 5-year survival rate of 92.7%. In summary, first-line FCR was associated with long EFS, especially in patients exhibiting a mutated IGHV status., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma entity, and its incidence increases with age. There is a paucity of data regarding use of biweekly R-CHOP (R-CHOP-14) in patients ≥80 years of age. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with DLBCL aged ≥80 years treated with R-CHOP-14 and R-miniCHOP in two academic tertiary centers in Germany between 01/01/2005 and 12/30/2019. Overall, 79 patients were included. Median age was 84 years (range 80-91). Despite higher CR rates with R-CHOP-14 (71.4% vs. 52.4%), no statistically significant difference could be found between patients treated with R-CHOP-14 and R-miniCHOP regarding overall survival (OS) (p = .88, HR 0.94, 95% CI = 0.47-1.90) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = .26, HR 0.66, 95% CI = 0.32-1.36). At a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-year OS rates were 56% with R-CHOP-14 and 53% with R-miniCHOP. Two-year PFS rates were 46% for R-CHOP-14 and 50% for R-mini-CHOP. Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy did not correlate with OS (p = .72). With the caveat of a retrospective cohort study, we conclude that lacking a difference in OS, R-miniCHOP should be preferred for most patients with untreated DLBCL aged ≥80 years., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Competing Interests: Nadine Kutsch: Honoraria: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Kite/Gilead; Research support: AstraZeneca, Gilead. travel grants: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene, Janssen. Sandra Robrecht: Honoraria: AstraZeneca. Anna Fink: Research funding: AstraZeneca and Celgene, Travel grants: AbbVie. Elisabeth Lange: no COIs. Rudolf Weide: Personal fees from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Biotest, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Hexal, Incyte, Medac, Menarini‐Stemline, Pierre Fabre, Roche, SeaGen, Sobi, and Takeda. Our institution has received research funding from Amgen, Biotest, Celgene, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GSK, Hexal, Lilly, Medac, Mundipharma, Octapharma, Sobi, and Takeda. Michael G. Kiehl: no COIs. Martin Sökler: no COIs. Rudolf Schlag: no COIs. Ursula Vehling‐Kaiser: no COIs. Georg Köchling: no COIs. Christoph Plöger: no COIs. Michael Gregor: no COIs. Torben Plesner: advisory board: Celgene/BMS. Michael R. Clausen: no COIs. Ilske Oschlies: no COIs. Matthias Ritgen: grants from F. Hoffman‐La Roche; and personal fees from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche and AbbVie. Marco Herling: no COIs. Kirsten Fischer: Advisory Board: AbbVie, Roche, AstaZeneca, Honoraria: Roche, AstraZeneca, Travel Support: Roche. Hartmut Döhner: Advisory role with honoraria for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Jazz, Pfizer, Servier, Stemline, Syndax; clinical research funding (to institution) from AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kronos Bio, Servier. Clemens‐Martin Wendtner: Research grants, advisory boards and travel grants by Hoffmann‐La Roche, Janssen‐Cilag, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, BeiGene and GSK. Karl‐Anton Kreuzer: consultant or advisory board member, honoraria and research support by AbbVie, Amgen, F. Hoffmann‐LaRoche, Gilead, Janssen‐Cilag and Mundipharma. Stephan Stilgenbauer: Advisory board, honoraria, research support, travel support, speaker fees, trial participation: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann‐La Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Sunesis. Michael Hallek: Consultant or advisory board member, honoraria, and research support by AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, F. Hoffmann‐LaRoche, Gilead, Janssen‐Cilag and Mundipharma. Sebastian Böttcher: research funding from Janssen and AbbVie; and honoraria from Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, Novartis, Becton Dickinson, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi. Wolfram Klapper: Research grants from Roche, Amgen, Janssen, InCyte Regeneraon, Takeda and advisory role (Roche) paid to my institution. All without relevance for the current manuscript. Barbara Eichhorst: Consultant or advisory board member, research support or travel support by AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, F. Hoffmann‐LaRoche, Gilead, Janssen‐Cilag.

Abstract: The phase 2 CLL2-BAAG trial tested the measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided triple combination of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab after optional bendamustine debulking in 45 patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). MRD was measured by flow cytometry (FCM; undetectable MRD <10-4) in peripheral blood (PB) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction of variable-diversity-joining (VDJ) rearrangements and CLL-related mutations in plasma. The median number of previous treatments was 1 (range, 1-4); 18 patients (40%) had received a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and/or venetoclax before inclusion, 14 of 44 (31.8%) had TP53 aberrations, and 34 (75.6%) had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region genes. With a median observation time of 36.3 months and all patients off-treatment for a median of 21.9 months, uMRD <10-4 in PB was achieved in 42 of the 45 patients (93.3%) at any time point, including 17 of 18 (94.4%) previously exposed to venetoclax/BTKi and 13 of 14 (92.9%) with TP53 aberrations. The estimated 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 85.0% and 93.8%, respectively. Overall, 585 paired FCM/ctDNA samples were analyzed and 18 MRD recurrences (5 with and 13 without clinical progression) occurred after the end of treatment. Twelve samples were first detected by ctDNA, 3 by FCM, and 3 synchronously. In conclusion, time-limited MRD-guided acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab achieved deep remissions in almost all patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. The addition of ctDNA-based analyses to FCM MRD assessment seems to improve early detection of relapses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03787264., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi) is a standard-of-care for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In the CLL14 study, patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting conditions were randomized to 12 cycles of Ven-Obi (n=216) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (Clb-Obi, n=216). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Key secondary endpoints included time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), overall survival (OS) and rates of adverse events. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) of time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. At a median observation time of 76.4 months, PFS remained superior for Ven-Obi compared to Clb-Obi (median 76.2 vs 36.4 months; HR 0.40[95%CI 0.31-0.52], p<0.0001). Likewise, TTNT was longer after Ven-Obi (6-year-TTNT 65.2% vs 37.1%; HR 0.44, 95%CI 0.33-0.58, p<0.0001). In the Ven-Obi arm, presence of del(17p), unmutated-IGHV and lymph node size ≥5 cm were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. Five years after treatment, 17 patients (7.9% of intention-to-treat-population) in the Ven-Obi arm had uMRD (<10-4 in peripheral blood) compared to 4 (1.9%) in the Clb-Obi arm. 6-year-OS rate was 78.7% in the Ven-Obi and 69.2% in the Clb-Obi arm (HR 0.69[95%CI 0.48-1.01], p=0.052). A significantly longer TUDD in global health status/QoL was observed in the Ven-Obi compared to the Clb-Obi arm (median 82.1 vs 65.1 months; HR 0.70[95%CI 0.51-0.97]). Follow-up adjusted SPM incidence rates were 2.3 and 1.4/1000 patient-months in the Ven-Obi and Clb-Obi arm, respectively. The sustained long-term survival, uMRD and QoL benefits support the use of one-year fixed-duration Ven-Obi in CLL. NCT02242942, EudraCT 2014-001810-24., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Deregulated apoptosis signaling is characteristic for many cancers and contributes to leukemogenesis and treatment failure in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Apoptosis is controlled by different pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules. Inhibition of anti-apoptotic molecules like B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) has been developed as therapeutic strategy. Venetoclax (VEN), a selective BCL-2 inhibitor has shown clinical activity in different lymphoid malignancies and is currently evaluated in first clinical trials in BCP-ALL. However, insensitivity to VEN has been described constituting a major clinical concern. Here, we addressed and modeled VEN-resistance in BCP-ALL, investigated the underlying mechanisms in cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) samples and identified potential strategies to overcome VEN-insensitivity. Leukemia lines with VEN-specific resistance were generated in vitro and further characterized using RNA-seq analysis. Interestingly, gene sets annotated to the citric/tricarboxylic acid cycle and the respiratory electron transport chain were significantly enriched and upregulated, indicating increased mitochondrial metabolism in VEN-resistant ALL. Metabolic profiling showed sustained high mitochondrial metabolism in VEN-resistant lines as compared to control lines. Accordingly, primary PDX-ALL samples with intrinsic VEN-insensitivity showed higher oxygen consumption and ATP production rates, further highlighting that increased mitochondrial activity is a characteristic feature of VEN-resistant ALL. VEN-resistant PDX-ALL showed significant higher mitochondrial DNA content and differed in mitochondria morphology with significantly larger and elongated structures, further corroborating our finding of augmented mitochondrial metabolism upon VEN-resistance. Using Oligomycin, an inhibitor of the complex V/ATPase subunit, we found synergistic activity and apoptosis induction in VEN-resistant BCP-ALL cell lines and PDX samples, demonstrating that acquired and intrinsic VEN-insensitivity can be overcome by co-targeting BCL-2 and the OxPhos pathway. These findings of reprogrammed, high mitochondrial metabolism in VEN-resistance and synergistic activity upon co-targeting BCL-2 and oxidative phosphorylation strongly suggest further preclinical and potential clinical evaluation in VEN-resistant BCP-ALL., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: We have previously identified an unsuspected role for GJB3 showing that the deficiency of this connexin protein induces aneuploidy in human and murine cells and accelerates cell transformation as well as tumor formation in xenograft models. The molecular mechanisms by which loss of GJB3 leads to aneuploidy and cancer initiation and progression remain unsolved., Methods: GJB3 expression levels were determined by RT-qPCR and Western blot. The consequences of GJB3 knockdown on genome instability were assessed by metaphase chromosome counting, multinucleation of cells, by micronuclei formation and by the determination of spindle orientation. Interactions of GJB3 with α-tubulin and F-actin was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemistry. Consequences of GJB3 deficiency on microtubule and actin dynamics were measured by live cell imaging and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments, respectively. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine GJB3 levels on human and murine bladder cancer tissue sections. Bladder cancer in mice was chemically induced by BBN-treatment., Results: We find that GJB3 is highly expressed in the ureter and bladder epithelium, but it is downregulated in invasive bladder cancer cell lines and during tumor progression in both human and mouse bladder cancer. Downregulation of GJB3 expression leads to aneuploidy and genomic instability in karyotypically stable urothelial cells and experimental modulation of GJB3 levels alters the migration and invasive capacity of bladder cancer cell lines. Importantly, GJB3 interacts both with α-tubulin and F-actin. The impairment of these interactions alters the dynamics of these cytoskeletal components and leads to defective spindle orientation., Conclusion: We conclude that deregulated microtubule and actin dynamics have an impact on proper chromosome separation and tumor cell invasion and migration. Consequently, these observations indicate a possible role for GJB3 in the onset and spreading of bladder cancer and demonstrate a molecular link between enhanced aneuploidy and invasive capacity cancer cells during tumor cell dissemination., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), analysis of TP53 aberrations (deletion and/or mutation) is a crucial part of treatment decision-making algorithms. Technological and treatment advances have resulted in the need for an update of the last recommendations for TP53 analysis in CLL, published by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, in 2018. Based on the current knowledge of the relevance of low-burden TP53-mutated clones, a specific variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off for reporting TP53 mutations is no longer recommended, but instead, the need for thorough method validation by the reporting laboratory is emphasized. The result of TP53 analyses should always be interpreted within the context of available laboratory and clinical information, treatment indication, and therapeutic options. Methodological aspects of introducing next-generation sequencing (NGS) in routine practice are discussed with a focus on reliable detection of low-burden clones. Furthermore, potential interpretation challenges are presented, and a simplified algorithm for the classification of TP53 variants in CLL is provided, representing a consensus based on previously published guidelines. Finally, the reporting requirements are highlighted, including a template for clinical reports of TP53 aberrations. These recommendations are intended to assist diagnosticians in the correct assessment of TP53 mutation status, but also physicians in the appropriate understanding of the lab reports, thus decreasing the risk of misinterpretation and incorrect management of patients in routine practice whilst also leading to improved stratification of patients with CLL in clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: We evaluated the chronic lymphocytic leukemia International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) in patients with CLL treated first line with targeted drugs (n = 991) or chemoimmunotherapy (n = 1256). With a median observation time of 40.5 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for targeted drug-treated patients varied by CLL-IPI risk group: 96.5% (low), 87.6% (intermediate), 82.4% (high), and 78.7% (very high). Differences between consecutive CLL-IPI risk groups were observed for intermediate vs low and high vs intermediate, but not very high vs high. CLL-IPI factors β2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) status, and TP53 status each retained prognostic value for PFS. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates by CLL-IPI risk groups were 100%, 96%, 93.9%, and 89.4%, respectively, with no differences between consecutive risk groups. Age, Binet stage, β2-microglobulin, and TP53 status each retained prognostic value for OS. In chemoimmunotherapy patients (median observation time, 66.9 months), 3-year PFS rates for CLL-IPI risk groups were 78.1%, 51.4%, 40.1%, and 16.5%, respectively; corresponding 3-year OS rates were 97.4%, 93.1%, 81.8%, and 57.3%. In a matched-pair analysis, PFS differences in targeted therapies (n = 812) vs chemoimmunotherapy (n = 812) across all risk groups and OS differences in all but patients at low risk were demonstrated. The CLL-IPI maintains its prognostic value in predicting PFS outcomes with targeted drugs, but its impact in predicting survival appears diminished. Targeted therapies showed enhanced outcomes over chemoimmunotherapy, highlighting their effectiveness across various risk groups. Our findings support ongoing assessment of prognostic tools in CLL treatment evolution. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02345863, #NCT02401503, #NCT02689141, #NCT02445131, #NCT02758665, #NCT02950051, #NCT02242942, #NCT00262782, #NCT00281918, and #NCT01010061., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: In the primary analysis report of the GAIA/CLL13 trial, we found that venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib improved undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) rates and progression-free survival compared with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. However, to our knowledge, no data on direct comparisons of different venetoclax-based combinations are available., Methods: GAIA/CLL13 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study conducted at 159 sites in ten countries in Europe and the Middle East. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a life expectancy of at least 6 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status of 0-2, a cumulative illness rating scale score of 6 or lower or a single score of 4 or lower, and no TP53 aberrations. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with a computer-generated list stratified by age, Binet stage, and regional study group, to either chemoimmunotherapy, venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. All treatments were administered in 28-day cycles. Patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group received six cycles of treatment, with patients older than 65 years receiving intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m 2 , days 1-2), whereas patients aged 65 years or younger received intravenous fludarabine (25 mg/m 2 , days 1-3) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m 2 , days 1-3). Intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m 2 , day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m 2 , day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added to chemotherapy. In the experimental groups, patients received daily venetoclax (400 mg orally) for ten cycles after a 5-week ramp-up phase starting on day 22 of cycle 1. In the venetoclax-rituximab group, intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m 2 , day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m 2 , day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added. In the obinutuzumab-containing groups, obinutuzumab was added (cycle 1: 100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, and 1000 mg on days 8 and 15; cycles 2-6: 1000 mg on day 1). In the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, daily ibrutinib (420 mg orally, from day 1 of cycle 1) was added until undetectable MRD was reached in two consecutive measurements (3 months apart) or until cycle 36. The planned treatment duration was six cycles in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 12 cycles in the venetoclax-rituximab and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group and between 12 and 36 cycles in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group. Coprimary endpoints were the undetectable MRD rate in peripheral blood at month 15 for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab versus standard chemoimmunotherapy and investigator-assessed progression-free survival for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib versus standard chemoimmunotherapy, both analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment) with a split α of 0·025 for each coprimary endpoint. Both coprimary endpoints have been reported elsewhere. Here we report a post-hoc exploratory analysis of updated progression-free survival results after a 4-year follow-up of our study population. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02950051, recruitment is complete, and all patients are off study treatment., Findings: Between Dec 13, 2016, and Oct 13, 2019, 1080 patients were screened and 926 were randomly assigned to treatment (chemoimmunotherapy group n=229; venetoclax-rituximab group n=237; venetoclax-obinutuzumab group n=229; and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group n=231); mean age 60·8 years (SD 10·2), 259 (28%) of 926 patients were female, and 667 (72%) were male (data on race and ethnicity are not reported). At data cutoff for this exploratory follow-up analysis (Jan 31, 2023; median follow-up 50·7 months [IQR 44·6-57·9]), patients in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group had significantly longer progression-free survival than those in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·47 [97·5% CI 0·32-0·69], p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·57 [0·38-0·84], p=0·0011). The venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group also had a significantly longer progression-free survival than the chemoimmunotherapy group (0·30 [0·19-0·47]; p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·38 [0·24-0·59]; p<0·0001). There was no difference in progression-free survival between the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups (0·63 [0·39-1·02]; p=0·031), and the proportional hazards assumption was not met for the comparison between the venetoclax-rituximab group versus the chemoimmunotherapy group (log-rank p=0·10). The estimated 4-year progression-free survival rate was 85·5% (97·5% CI 79·9-91·1; 37 [16%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, 81·8% (75·8-87·8; 55 [24%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 70·1% (63·0-77·3; 84 [35%] events) in the venetoclax-rituximab group, and 62·0% (54·4-69·7; 90 [39%] events) in the chemoimmunotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (114 [53%] of 216 patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 109 [46%] of 237 in the venetoclax-rituximab group, 127 [56%] of 228 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, and 112 [48%] of 231 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group). Deaths determined to be associated with study treatment by the investigator occurred in three (1%) patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group (n=1 due to each of sepsis, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, and Richter's syndrome), none in the venetoclax-rituximab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups, and four (2%) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (n=1 due to each of acute myeloid leukaemia, fungal encephalitis, small-cell lung cancer, and toxic leukoencephalopathy)., Interpretation: With more than 4 years of follow-up, venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib significantly extended progression-free survival compared with both chemoimmunotherapy and venetoclax-rituximab in previously untreated, fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, thereby supporting their use and further evaluation in this patient group, while still considering the higher toxicities observed with the triple combination., Funding: AbbVie, Janssen, and F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MF reports research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, and Roche, and honoraria from AbbVie. JvT reports honoraria from AbbVie, BeiGene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Lilly, and Roche; travel grants from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Roche, Lilly, and Janssen; and has received consulting fees from and participated on advisory boards for AbbVe, BeiGene, Amgen, and AstraZeneca. MG has received honoraria for participation in symposia and advisory boards from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS)/Celgene, GSK, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Jazz, Roche, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Servier; travel support from AbbVie, BeiGene, Pfizer, and Roche; all fees went to their institution. GJ has received honoraria from Astellas and AbbVie and participated on advisory boards for AbbVie and Servier. M-DL reports travel grants from AbbVie and Janssen. CdC-B reports consulting fees from Janssen, honoraria for lectures from Octapharma, support for attending meetings from AbbVie and Octapharma, and participation on advisory boards for Janssen, BeiGene, and AstraZeneca. CSchn reports speakers fees from AstraZeneca and AbbVie, travel support from AbbVie, and participation on an advisory board for Janssen. RB reports travel support from BeiGene, Janssen, and AbbVie, and honoraria for participation on an advisory board from AbbVie. TN reports honoraria for lectures or presentations and has participated at advisory boards from AbbVie, Roche, AstraZeneca, Gilead, BeiGene, and Janssen. CBP is the chairman of the Danish CLL group. HF reports research funding from Sanofi, Novartis, and Alexion and honoraria for lectures from Sanofi. NK reports research funding from AstraZeneca; honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Kite/Gilead, BMS, and Lilly; and travel support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Lilly, and Janssen; and participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca and Janssen. JD reports consulting fees, honoraria, and travel support from AbbVie and Janssen. SB reports honoraria from and participation on speakers bureaus for Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi; travel support from Janssen, BeiGene, and Roche; and research funding from Janssen and Miltenyi. FS reports speakers fees from AstraZeneca, travel support from Lilly, and research funding from AstraZeneca. A-MF reports research funding and honoraria from AstraZeneca and travel support from AbbVie. KF reports research grants from AbbVie and Roche, honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, and travel support from Roche. K-AK reports consulting fees, participation on speakers bureaus, and research funding from Roche, AbbVie, and Janssen. MR reports honoraria from Janssen, Roche, and AstraZeneca; consulting fees from Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie; research funding from AbbVie and Roche, and travel support from AstraZeneca. MBr reports research funding and consulting fees from Amgen; honoraria for speakers bureaus from Amgen, Becton Dickinson, Janssen, and Pfizer; travel support from Janssen; and participation on advisory boards for Incyte and Amgen. ET reports participation on advisory boards and honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, and BeiGene, AstraZeneca, and Roche; and travel support from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen. SS reports honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, and Sunesis; research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, and Sunesis; travel support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis; and speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, and Sunesis. MH reports consulting fees from Roche, Gilead, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, and AstraZeneca and honoraria from Roche, Gilead, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, and AstraZeneca. APK reports honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, LAVA, and Roche/Genentech; travel grants from AbbVie and Janssen; research funding from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, AbbVie, and BMS. CUN reports research funding from Octapharma and AstraZeneca; consultancy and speaker fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Genmab, BeiGene, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Takeda, Lilly, and MSD; and participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, MSD, Genmab, and Janssen. BE reports consulting fees fromJanssen, AbbVie, Gilead, AstraZeneca, MSD, BeiGene, and Lilly; participation on speakers bureau for Roche, AbbVie, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, and MSD; honoraria from Roche, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, and MSD; research funding from Janssen, Gilead, Roche, AbbVie, BeiGene, and AstraZeneca; and travel support from BeiGene. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The therapy of relapsed or refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients remains a major clinical challenge to date. We conducted a randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase-III trial hypothesizing superior efficacy of rituximab, high-dose cytarabine and dexamethasone with bortezomib (R-HAD + B) versus without (R-HAD) in r/r MCL ineligible for or relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), secondary endpoints included response rates, progression free survival, overall survival, and safety. In total, 128 of 175 planned patients were randomized to R-HAD + B (n = 64) or R-HAD (n = 64). Median TTF was 12 vs. 2.6 months (p = 0.045, MIPI-adjusted HR 0.69; 95%CI 0.47-1.02). Overall and complete response rates were 63 vs. 45% (p = 0.049) and 42 vs. 19% (p = 0.0062). A significant treatment effect was seen in the subgroup of patients >65 years (aHR 0.48, 0.29-0.79) and without previous ASCT (aHR 0.52, 0.28-0.96). Toxicity was mostly hematological and attributable to the chemotherapeutic backbone. Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and lymphocytopenia were more common in R-HAD + B without differences in severe infections between both arms. Bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy can be effective in r/r MCL and should be evaluated further as a therapeutic option, especially if therapy with BTK inhibitors is not an option. Trial registration: NCT01449344., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Adding ibrutinib to standard immunochemotherapy might improve outcomes and challenge autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in younger (aged 65 years or younger) mantle cell lymphoma patients. This trial aimed to investigate whether the addition of ibrutinib results in a superior clinical outcome compared with the pre-trial immunochemotherapy standard with ASCT or an ibrutinib-containing treatment without ASCT. We also investigated whether standard treatment with ASCT is superior to a treatment adding ibrutinib but without ASCT., Methods: The open-label, randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority TRIANGLE trial was performed in 165 secondary or tertiary clinical centres in 13 European countries and Israel. Patients with previously untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma, aged 18-65 years and suitable for ASCT were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to control group A or experimental groups A+I or I, stratified by study group and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index risk groups. Treatment in group A consisted of six alternating cycles of R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m 2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m 2 on day 1, intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2 on day 1, intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m 2 on day 1, and oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1-5) and R-DHAP (or R-DHAOx, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m 2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous or oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, intravenous cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m 2 for 3 h every 12 h on day 2, and intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 over 24 h on day 1 or alternatively intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1) followed by ASCT. In group A+I, ibrutinib (560 mg orally each day) was added on days 1-19 of R-CHOP cycles and as fixed-duration maintenance (560 mg orally each day for 2 years) after ASCT. In group I, ibrutinib was given the same way as in group A+I, but ASCT was omitted. Three pairwise one-sided log-rank tests for the primary outcome of failure-free survival were statistically monitored. The primary analysis was done by intention-to-treat. Adverse events were evaluated by treatment period among patients who started the respective treatment. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858258., Findings: Between July 29, 2016 and Dec 28, 2020, 870 patients (662 men, 208 women) were randomly assigned to group A (n=288), group A+I (n=292), and group I (n=290). After 31 months median follow-up, group A+I was superior to group A with 3-year failure-free survival of 88% (95% CI 84-92) versus 72% (67-79; hazard ratio 0·52 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-0·86]; one-sided p=0·0008). Superiority of group A over group I was not shown with 3-year failure-free survival 72% (67-79) versus 86% (82-91; hazard ratio 1·77 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-3·76]; one-sided p=0·9979). The comparison of group A+I versus group I is ongoing. There were no relevant differences in grade 3-5 adverse events during induction or ASCT between patients treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP or ibrutinib combined with R-CHOP/R-DHAP. During maintenance or follow-up, substantially more grade 3-5 haematological adverse events and infections were reported after ASCT plus ibrutinib (group A+I; haematological: 114 [50%] of 231 patients; infections: 58 [25%] of 231; fatal infections: two [1%] of 231) compared with ibrutinib only (group I; haematological: 74 [28%] of 269; infections: 52 [19%] of 269; fatal infections: two [1%] of 269) or after ASCT (group A; haematological: 51 [21%] of 238; infections: 32 [13%] of 238; fatal infections: three [1%] of 238)., Interpretation: Adding ibrutinib to first-line treatment resulted in superior efficacy in younger mantle cell lymphoma patients with increased toxicity when given after ASCT. Adding ibrutinib during induction and as maintenance should be part of first-line treatment of younger mantle cell lymphoma patients. Whether ASCT adds to an ibrutinib-containing regimen is not yet determined., Funding: Janssen and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MD reports research grants for clinical studies from AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Roche; speakers' honoraria from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche; travel support from Janssen and Roche; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Novartis, and Roche. JDo reports payment for expert testimony (once Advisory Board) from Lilly. EG reports grants from Janssen; honoraria (educational lecture) from Genmab, Gilead, Janssen, and Lilly; support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen and Roche; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Gilead/Kite and Miltenyi Biotec. MJ reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, and Roche; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Pierre Fabre. JW reports grants to his institution from GlaxoSmithKline/Novartis and Roche; honoraria for lectures from AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Servier, and Takeda; participation on an Advisory Board from AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. MHu reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genmab, Janssen, Merck, Roche, and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genmab, Janssen, Merck, Roche, and Takeda. UM reports travel support from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, and Roche; Advisory Board role for Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; participation in national Guideline committee for the German-Swiss-Austrian Guideline for Mantle Cell Lymphoma. JR reports participation on an Advisory Board for AstraZeneca. VV reports consulting fees from AbbVie, BeiGene, Gilead, Lilly, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen; payment for expert testimony from Gilead and Roche; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie and Gilead. MGdS reports a research grant from AstraZeneca; payment for Advisory Boards from AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for educational events from Gilead and Janssen-Cilag; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche; leadership in a scientific society (Sociedade Portuguesa de Hematologia); administration board on a patient advocacy group (Associação Portuguesa Contra a Leucemia). SL reports grants or contracts to her institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Genmab, HUTCHMED, Novartis, and Roche; consulting fees from AbbVie, Genmab, Gilead, Novartis, ORION Pharma, Roche, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, Incyte, and Novartis; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Incyte. StS reports grants or contracts from any entity from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; consulting fees from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem. AK reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, BeiGene, EUSA Pharma, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda. RJ reports travel support for meeting attendance from BeiGene; meeting fee from Janssen. GH reports grants or contracts for clinical research from AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Pfizer, and Roche; consulting fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, and Roche; support for attending meetings or travel from Gilead/Kite and Janssen; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Miltenyi Biotec. CV reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Istituto Gentili, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Servier; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche. TvM reports payment or honoraria for educational lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Lilly; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for GE HealthCare and Gilead/Kite. SW reports payment to his institution from AbbVie, Stemline Therapeutics, and Takeda; payment for expert testimony from Stemline Therapeutics; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie and BeiGene; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Roche, and Stemline Therapeutics. PLZ reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda. UN reports consulting fees to his institution from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events to his institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, and Takeda; support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen, Gilead, Roche, and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Takeda. CH reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Pfizer; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie and Janssen. MHa reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Falk Foundation, Gilead, Novartis, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi); payment for expert testimony from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi). WK reports research grants provided to his institution from Amgen, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda. DG reports support for attending meetings and travel from Janssen. CS reports consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; support for attending meetings or travel from Gilead/Kite. MU reports institutional funding of the TRIANGLE trial from Janssen. ML reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, and Lilly; honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, and Lilly; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board with Acerta. All other authors (MT, OS, LJ, MC, LA, PH, FB, KS, JDi, CP, and EH) declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Chromosome 17p deletion (del[17p]) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Venetoclax is approved for treatment of previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, including patients with del(17p), based on the open-label, multicenter, phase 2 M13-982 trial (NCT01889186). Here, we detail the 6-year follow-up analysis for M13-982. A total of 158 patients with previously untreated (n = 5) or R/R (n = 153) del(17p) CLL received 400 mg venetoclax daily after initial ramp-up until progressive disease. After a median follow-up of 70 months, the best objective response rate (ORR) was 77% (21% complete remission [CR] and 49% partial remission [PR]), with a median duration of response (DOR) of 39.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.1-50.5). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.2 months (95% CI, 23.4-37.6), and median overall survival (OS) was 62.5 months (95% CI, 51.7-not reached), with 16% of patients remaining on treatment after 6 years. Multivariable analysis did not identify statistically significant correlation between patient subgroups defined by clinical or laboratory variables and ORR or PFS. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (42%), infections (33%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (16%). Post hoc comparative analyses of PFS and OS from treatment initiation, from a 24-month landmark, and by minimal residual disease status were performed between patients with del(17p) in the M13-982 and MURANO studies in the interest of understanding these data in another context. These long-term data show the continued benefits of venetoclax in patients with del(17p) CLL. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01889186., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM5) provides a revised classification of lymphoid malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and plasma cell myeloma/multiple myeloma (PCM/MM). For both diseases the descriptions of precursor states such as monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) have been updated including a better risk stratification model. New insights on mutational landscapes and branching evolutionary pattern were embedded as diagnostic and prognostic factors, accompanied by a revised structure for the chapter of plasma cell neoplasms. Thus, the WHO-HAEM5 leads to practical improvements of biological and clinical relevance for pathologists, clinicians, geneticists and scientists in the field of lymphoid malignancies. The present review gives an overview on the landscape of genetic alterations in CLL and plasma cell neoplasms with a focus on their impact on classification and treatment., (© 2024 the author(s), published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Venetoclax, a highly selective, oral B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor, provides a robust targeted-therapy option for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including patients with high-risk del(17p)/mutated- TP53 and immunoglobulin heavy variable region unmutated CLL and those refractory to chemoimmunotherapy across all age groups. Due to the potent pro-apoptotic effect of venetoclax, treatment initiation carries a risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Prompt and appropriate management is needed to limit clinical TLS, which may entail serious adverse events and death. Venetoclax ramp-up involves gradual, stepwise increases in daily venetoclax dosing from 20 mg to 400 mg (target dose) over 5 weeks; adherence to on-label scheduling provides a tumor debulking phase, reducing the risk of TLS. The key components of safe venetoclax therapy involve assessment (radiographic evaluation and baseline blood chemistry), preparation (adequate hydration), and initiation (blood chemistry monitoring). In addition to summarizing the evidence for venetoclax's efficacy and safety, this review uses hypothetical patient scenarios based on risk level for TLS (high, medium, low) to share the authors' clinical experience with venetoclax initiation and present global approaches utilized in various treatment settings. These hypothetical scenarios highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making, outlining best practices for venetoclax initiation and overall optimal treatment strategies in patients with CLL.

Purpose: The outcome of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved by the introduction of immunochemotherapy, followed by rituximab (R)-maintenance. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) represents a promising tool for individualized treatment decisions and was a prospectively planned part of the European MCL Elderly trial. We investigated how MRD status influenced the efficacy of R-maintenance and how MRD can enable tailored consolidation strategies., Patients and Methods: Previously untreated patients with MCL age 60 years or older have been randomly assigned to R versus interferon-alpha maintenance after response to rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (R-FC) versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP). MRD monitoring was performed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) following EuroMRD guidelines., Results: A qPCR assay with a median sensitivity of 1 × 10 -5 could be generated in 80% of 288 patients in an international, multicenter, multilaboratory setting. More extensive tumor dissemination facilitated the identification of a molecular marker. The efficacy of R-maintenance in clinical remission was confirmed for MRD-negative patients at the end of induction in terms of progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.63]) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.68]), particularly in R-CHOP-treated patients (PFS-HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.52]; OS-HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.52]). R-maintenance appeared less effective in MRD-positive patients (PFS-HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26 to 1.02]) overall and after R-CHOP induction (PFS-HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.26]). R-FC achieved more frequent and faster MRD clearance compared with R-CHOP. MRD positivity in clinical remission after induction was associated with a short median time to clinical progression of approximately 1-1.7 years., Conclusion: The results confirm the strong efficacy of R-maintenance in patients who are MRD-negative after induction. Treatment de-escalation for MRD-negative patients is discouraged by our results. More effective consolidation strategies should be explored in MRD-positive patients to improve their long-term prognosis.

The SCHOLAR-2 retrospective study highlighted poor overall survival (OS) with standard of care (SOC) regimens among patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who failed a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). In the ZUMA-2 single-arm trial, brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel; autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable responses in patients with R/R MCL who had previous BTKi exposure. Here, we compared OS in ZUMA-2 and SCHOLAR-2 using three different methods which adjusted for imbalances in prognostic factors between populations: inverse probability weighting (IPW), regression adjustment (RA), and doubly robust (DR). Brexu-cel was associated with improved OS compared to SOC across all unadjusted and adjusted comparisons. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 0.38 (0.23, 0.61) for IPW, 0.45 (0.28, 0.74) for RA, and 0.37 (0.23, 0.59) for DR. These results suggest a substantial survival benefit with brexu-cel versus SOC in patients with R/R MCL after BTKi exposure.

In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Richter transformation (RT) reflects the development of an aggressive lymphoma that is associated with poor response to chemotherapy and short survival. We initiated an international, investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label phase 2 study in which patients with RT received a combination of the PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab plus the BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib for 12 cycles. Patients responding to treatment underwent maintenance treatment with both agents. The primary end point was overall response rate after six cycles. Of 59 enrolled patients, 48 patients received at least two cycles of treatment and comprised the analysis population according to the study protocol. The median observation time was 13.9 months, the median age was 67 (range 45-82) years. Ten patients (20.8%) had received previous RT-directed therapy. In total, 28 out of 48 patients responded to induction therapy with an overall response rate of 58.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 43.2-72.4), including 9 (18.8%) complete reponse and 19 (39.6%) partial response, meeting the study's primary end point by rejecting the predefined null hypothesis of 40% (P = 0.008). Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival. The median duration of response was not reached, the median progression-free survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 3.8-16.3). Median overall survival was not reached with a 12-month overall survival rate of 74.7% (95% CI 58.4-91.0). The most common adverse events were infections (18.0%), gastrointestinal disorders (13.0%) and hematological toxicities (11.4%). These data suggest that combined checkpoint and BTK inhibition by tislelizumab plus zanubrutinib is an effective and well-tolerated treatment strategy for patients with RT. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271956 ., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Demographics are important prognostic factors in malignant diseases. A nationwide analysis concerning the prognostic impact of demographics in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients (HNCP) has not been performed previously., Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from the Center for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD) and the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) between 2002 and 2017 was performed. A total of 212'920 HNCP were included. Incidence, tumor stage, age development, sex distribution, age-, residence-, and diagnosis-time-specific survival were examined., Results: Mean age of HNCP increased more rapidly than in the general population (slope coefficient: 0.29 vs. 0.20; p < 0.0001). Higher age and male sex were associated with a worse prognosis. Whereas overall survival (OS) increased from the early to the later observation period for HNCP <70 years, no OS improvement for HNCP >70 years was found. Furthermore, an OS disadvantage was observed for East Germany compared to West Germany (median 47 vs. 60 months; p < 0.0001). This disparity was associated with a disproportionately high ratio of men in East Germany (men/women: 4.4 vs. 3.1; p < 0.0001) and a lower mean age (61 vs. 63 years; p < 0.0001). In addition to stage, age and sex, residence in East Germany were confirmed as an independent factor for OS in a multivariate analysis., Conclusion: Finally, three decades after the German reunion, a survival disadvantage for patients in East Germany still exists. This discrepancy may be a result of socioeconomic disparities., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Cilia are best known and most studied for their manifold functions enabling proper embryonic development. Loss of cilia or dysfunction thereof results in a great variety of congenital malformations and syndromes. However, there are also cilia-driven conditions, which manifest only later in life, such as polycystic kidney disease. Even degenerative diseases in the central nervous system have recently been linked to alterations in cilia biology. Surprisingly though, there is very little knowledge regarding cilia in normally aged organisms absent any disease. Here, it is provided evidence that cilia in naturally aged mice are considerably elongated in the kidney and pancreas, respectively. Moreover, such altered cilia appear to have become dysfunctional as indicated by changes in cellular signaling., (© 2023 The Authors. Advanced Biology published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

The Virtual Opinions poll Independent Centered on CLL patients' Experience (VOICE) evaluated patients' knowledge about chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), their perspectives on diagnosis and treatment, and their unmet needs. Clinicians and patient advocacy group representatives developed and distributed the survey from March through December 2022 in 12 countries, and 377 patients with ≥1 line of previous CLL treatment responded from Europe, Latin America, the United States, Australia, Egypt, and Turkey. A majority of them (90%; 336/374) relied on their physicians for information regarding CLL and treatment. If at high risk, respondents prefer oral medications to intravenous (78%; 232/296), fixed duration treatment over treatment until progression (69%; 185/270), outpatient over inpatient treatments (91%; 257/283). Over three-fourths of respondents (78%; 286/368) wanted to be involved in treatment decisions, but a minority actually participated (44%; 138/313). COVID-19 vaccinations were widely available (97%; 273/281), but one-fifth (19%; 63/331) were unaware that CLL increases vulnerability to infections. Most patients' physicians explained their treatment options (84%; 297/355), and 90% (271/301) understood their treatment. Notably, >10% would continue treatment normally if they experienced cardiac problems or arrhythmias, whereas 23% would consider stopping treatment if they developed skin cancer. Treatment-associated side effects affected 27% to 43% of patients. These results in a global patient population highlight gaps in patients' knowledge of risk groups, their susceptibility to infections including COVID, and the side effects of common treatments. Such knowledge can guide the appropriate targeting of patient education initiatives by clinicians, advocates, and policymakers., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: RM, BC, SM, and AHS are AbbVie employees and may hold stock or options. SG, AAS, and SYK were employed at AbbVie when this work was conducted and may hold AbbVie stock or options. TL is a Genentech employee and may own stock. APK receives research funding from Janssen, AbbVie, Roche/Genentech, Astra Zeneca, and BMS and is a member of advisory boards for Janssen, AbbVie, Roche/Genentech, and BMS. APK also receives speaker fees from AbbVie. SS receives honoraria for consultancy, speaker honoraria, research grants, and travel support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffman La-Roche, Janssen, and Novartis and is an advisory board member for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Hoffman La-Roche, Janssen, and Novartis. JFS receives research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, and Roche, provides expert testimony for Celgene and Roche, is on the speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Celgene, and Roche, and is an advisory board member for AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Mei Pharma, Morphosys, Roche, Sunesis, and Takeda. AWR is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute which has received venetoclax-related milestone and royalty payments in which he shares. AWR received research funding from Abbvie and holds a patent related to venetoclax. JAW is a consultant for AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Beigene, and Arqule.

The location of nucleosomes in the human genome determines the primary chromatin structure and regulates access to regulatory regions. However, genome-wide information on deregulated nucleosome occupancy and its implications in primary cancer cells is scarce. Here, we conducted a genome-wide comparison of high-resolution nucleosome maps in peripheral blood B cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and healthy individuals at single-base-pair resolution. Our investigation uncovered significant changes of nucleosome positioning in CLL. Globally, the spacing between nucleosomes-the nucleosome repeat length (NRL)-is shortened in CLL. This effect is stronger in the more aggressive IGHV-unmutated CLL subtype than in the IGHV-mutated CLL subtype. Changes in nucleosome occupancy at specific sites are linked to active chromatin remodeling and reduced DNA methylation. Nucleosomes lost or gained in CLL marks differential binding of 3D chromatin organizers such as CTCF as well as immune response-related transcription factors and delineated mechanisms of epigenetic deregulation. The principal component analysis of nucleosome occupancy in cancer-specific regions allowed the classification of samples between cancer subtypes and normal controls. Furthermore, patients could be better assigned to CLL subtypes according to differential nucleosome occupancy than based on DNA methylation or gene expression. Thus, nucleosome positioning constitutes a novel readout to dissect molecular mechanisms of disease progression and to stratify patients. Furthermore, we anticipate that the global nucleosome repositioning detected in our study, such as changes in the NRL, can be exploited for liquid biopsy applications based on cell-free DNA to stratify patients and monitor disease progression., (© 2023 Piroeva et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.)

We have recently shown that loss of ORP3 leads to aneuploidy induction and promotes tumor formation. However, the specific mechanisms by which ORP3 contributes to ploidy-control and cancer initiation and progression is still unknown. Here, we report that ORP3 is highly expressed in ureter and bladder epithelium while its expression is downregulated in invasive bladder cancer cell lines and during tumor progression, both in human and in mouse bladder cancer. Moreover, we observed an increase in the incidence of N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)-nitrosamine (BBN)-induced invasive bladder carcinoma in the tissue-specific Orp3 knockout mice. Experimental data demonstrate that ORP3 protein interacts with γ-tubulin at the centrosomes and with components of actin cytoskeleton. Altering the expression of ORP3 induces aneuploidy and genomic instability in telomerase-immortalized urothelial cells with a stable karyotype and influences the migration and invasive capacity of bladder cancer cell lines. These findings demonstrate a crucial role of ORP3 in ploidy-control and indicate that ORP3 is a bona fide tumor suppressor protein. Of note, the presented data indicate that ORP3 affects both cell invasion and migration as well as genome stability through interactions with cytoskeletal components, providing a molecular link between aneuploidy and cell invasion and migration, two crucial characteristics of metastatic cells., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The final analysis of the open-label, multicenter phase 2 CLL2-GIVe trial shows response and tolerability of the triple combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax (GIVe regimen) in 41 previously untreated patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation. Induction consisted of 6 cycles of GIVe; venetoclax and ibrutinib were continued up to cycle 12 as consolidation. Ibrutinib was given until cycle 15 or up to cycle 36 in patients not achieving a complete response and with detectable minimal residual disease. The primary end point was the complete remission rate at cycle 15, which was achieved at 58.5% (95% CI, 42.1-73.7; P < .001). The last patient reached the end of the study in January 2022. After a median observation time of 38.4 months (range, 3.7-44.9), the 36-month progression-free survival was 79.9%, and the 36-month overall survival was 92.6%. Only 6 patients continued ibrutinib maintenance. Adverse events of concern were neutropenia (48.8%, grade ≥3) and infections (19.5%, grade ≥3). Cardiovascular toxicity grade 3 occurred as atrial fibrillation at a rate of 2.4% between cycles 1 and 12, as well as hypertension (4.9%) between cycles 1 and 6. The incidence of adverse events of any grade and grade ≥3 was highest during induction and decreased over time. Progressive disease was observed in 7 patients between cycles 27 and 42. In conclusion, the CLL2-GIVe regimen is a promising fixed-duration, first-line treatment for patients with high-risk CLL with a manageable safety profile., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

ELEVATE-RR demonstrated noninferior progression-free survival and lower incidence of key adverse events (AEs) with acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We further characterize AEs of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib via post hoc analysis. Overall and exposure-adjusted incidence rate was assessed for common Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated AEs and for selected events of clinical interest (ECIs). AE burden scores based on previously published methodology were calculated for AEs overall and selected ECIs. Safety analyses included 529 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 266; ibrutinib, n = 263). Among common AEs, incidences of any-grade diarrhea, arthralgia, urinary tract infection, back pain, muscle spasms, and dyspepsia were higher with ibrutinib, with 1.5- to 4.1-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rates. Incidences of headache and cough were higher with acalabrutinib, with 1.6- and 1.2-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rate, respectively. Among ECIs, incidences of any-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding were higher with ibrutinib, as were exposure-adjusted incidence rates (2.0-, 2.8-, and 1.6-fold, respectively); incidences of cardiac events overall (the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class) and infections were similar between arms. Rate of discontinuation because of AEs was lower for acalabrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). AE burden score was higher for ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib overall and for the ECIs atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding. A limitation of this analysis is its open-label study design, which may influence the reporting of more subjective AEs. Overall, event-based analyses and AE burden scores demonstrated higher AE burden overall and specifically for atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hemorrhage with ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Complex karyotypes have been associated with inferior outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), whereas their prognostic impact in the context of venetoclax-based treatments is still debated. In this prospective analysis on karyotype complexity in CLL, we evaluated the impact of complex (≥3 chromosomal aberrations [CAs], CKTs) and highly complex karyotypes (≥5 CAs; hCKTs) as well as specific aberrations in previously untreated patients without TP53 aberrations undergoing either CIT or time-limited venetoclax-based therapies in the phase 3 GAIA/CLL13 trial. Karyotype analyses were available for 895 of 926 patients (96.7%), of whom 153 (17%) had a CKT and 43 (5%) hCKT. In the CIT arm, CKT was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.58; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.54-4.32; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.03-10.26; P = .044). In the pooled venetoclax arms, a multivariable analysis identified hCKTs (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.03-3.72; P = .041), but not CKTs, as independent adverse prognosticators for PFS. The presence of translocations (unbalanced and/or balanced) was also independently associated with shorter PFSs in the venetoclax arms. CIT led to the acquisition of additional CAs (mean CAs, 2.0-3.4; from baseline to CLL progression), whereas karyotype complexity remained stable after venetoclax-based treatments (2.0, both time points). This analysis establishes highly complex karyotypes and translocations as adverse prognostic factors in the context of venetoclax-based combination treatments. The findings of this study support the incorporation of karyotyping into the standard diagnostic workup of CLL, because it identifies patients at high risk of poor treatment outcomes and thereby improves prognostication. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02950051., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) after relapse is associated with poor prognosis. No standard of care exists and available evidence for treatments is limited, particularly in patients who fail Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy. This multicentre retrospective chart review study, SCHOLAR-2, addresses this knowledge gap and reports on data collected from 240 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in Europe who were treated with BTKi-based therapy between July 2012 and July 2018, and had experienced disease progression while on BTKi therapy or discontinued BTKi therapy due to intolerance. The median overall survival (OS) from initiation of first BTKi therapy was 14.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-20.0) in the overall cohort, 5.5 months (95% CI 3.9-8.2) in 91 patients without post-BTKi therapy, and 23.8 months (95% CI 18.9-30.1) in 149 patients who received post-BTKi therapy (excluding chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment). In the latter group, patients received a median of one (range, one to seven) line of post-BTKi therapy, with lenalidomide-containing regimens and bendamustine plus rituximab being the most frequently administered; the median OS from initiation of first post-BTKi therapy was 9.7 months (95% CI 6.3-12.7). These results provide a benchmark for survival in patients with R/R MCL receiving salvage therapy after BTKi failure., (© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), epigenetic alterations are considered to centrally shape the transcriptional signatures that drive disease evolution and underlie its biological and clinical subsets. Characterizations of epigenetic regulators, particularly histone-modifying enzymes, are very rudimentary in CLL. In efforts to establish effectors of the CLL-associated oncogene T-cell leukemia 1A (TCL1A), we identified here the lysine-specific histone demethylase KDM1A to interact with the TCL1A protein in B cells in conjunction with an increased catalytic activity of KDM1A. We demonstrate that KDM1A is upregulated in malignant B cells. Elevated KDM1A and associated gene expression signatures correlated with aggressive disease features and adverse clinical outcomes in a large prospective CLL trial cohort. Genetic Kdm1a knockdown in Eμ-TCL1A mice reduced leukemic burden and prolonged animal survival, accompanied by upregulated p53 and proapoptotic pathways. Genetic KDM1A depletion also affected milieu components (T, stromal, and monocytic cells), resulting in significant reductions in their capacity to support CLL-cell survival and proliferation. Integrated analyses of differential global transcriptomes (RNA sequencing) and H3K4me3 marks (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing) in Eμ-TCL1A vs iKdm1aKD;Eμ-TCL1A mice (confirmed in human CLL) implicate KDM1A as an oncogenic transcriptional repressor in CLL which alters histone methylation patterns with pronounced effects on defined cell death and motility pathways. Finally, pharmacologic KDM1A inhibition altered H3K4/9 target methylation and revealed marked anti-B-cell leukemic synergisms. Overall, we established the pathogenic role and effector networks of KDM1A in CLL via tumor-cell intrinsic mechanisms and its impacts in cells of the microenvironment. Our data also provide rationales to further investigate therapeutic KDM1A targeting in CLL., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19)., Competing Interests: L. Thurner has received travel grants from Abbvie, Janssen and EUSA-Pharm, and has indicated consultancy for Takeda, Astra-Zeneca, Merck, EUSA-pharm. DK-M has received personal fees from Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, and nonfinancial support from Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Novartis. AV has received honoraria from Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and has indicated a membership of the advisory board of Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb. UBK has received honoraria and advisory fees from Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Hexal, Pfizer, Astra- Zeneca, Pentixapharm, Amgen, Novartis, MSD and has received clinical study support for Celgene, Takeda, BMS, Roche, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, MSD, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer. MN has received travel grants from Roche, Celgene and MSD and personal fees from Roche, Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Incyte and Abbvie. FG participates in advisory board of Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Merck, Takeda, MSD, Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen and Janssen. RT has received grants from Atara and Roche and travel support from Roche, Atara, Celgene, Janssen and Abbvie; he has indicated a membership of the advisory board of Atara and Abbvie and has indicated consultancy for s Atara. PdNB has indicated consultancy for Roche, Incyte and Novartis. FM has received travel grants from Roche, Takeda, Janssen and Gilead and has indicated consultancy and advisory role for Roche, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Takeda and Novartis. SS has received grants from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys and has indicated consultancy for for Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys; he has received drug/equipment supplied by entity from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys. VP has received grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid), Chugai, Abbvie, Amgen, Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb. GH has received grants from Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Spectrum and MSD. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

UNFOLDER (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19) is a phase-3 trial in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis, including primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso(lo)ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic/bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized criteria from 1999, which did not include F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET) scans. Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). A subgroup of 131 patients with PMBCLs was included (median age, 34 y; 54% female, 79% elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), 20% LDH >2× upper limit of normal [ULN], and 24% extralymphatic involvement). Eighty-two (R-CHOP-21: 43 and R-CHOP-14: 39) patients were assigned to radiotherapy and 49 (R-CHOP-21: 27, R-CHOP-14: 22) to observation. The 3-year EFS was superior in radiotherapy arm (94% [95% confidence interval (CI), 89-99] versus 78% [95% CI, 66-89]; P = 0.0069), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PRs) (2% versus 10%). PR triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy (n = 5; PR: 4; complete response/unconfirmed complete response: 1). No significant differences were observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (95% [95% CI, 90-100] versus 90% [95% CI, 81-98]; P = 0.25) nor in overall survival (OS) (98% [95% CI, 94-100] versus 96% [95% CI, 90-100]; P = 0.64). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21, EFS, PFS, and OS were not different. A prognostic marker for adverse outcome was elevated LDH >2× ULN (EFS: P = 0.016; PFS: P = 0.0049; OS: P = 0.0014). With the limitation of a pre-PET-era trial, the results suggest a benefit of radiotherapy only for patients responding to R-CHOP with PR. PMBCL treated with R-CHOP have a favorable prognosis with a 3-year OS of 97%., Competing Interests: GH has received grants from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Spectrum and MSD. L Thurner has received travel grants from Abbvie, Janssen and EUSA-Pharm, and has indicated consultancy for Takeda, Astra-Zeneca, Merck, EUSA-pharm. VP has received grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid), Chugai, Abbvie, Amgen, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. AV has received honoraria from Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and has indicated a membership of the advisory board of Roche, Amgen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb. MN has received travel grants from Roche, Celgene, and MSD and personal fees from Roche, Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Incyte, and Abbvie. FG participates in advisory board of Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Merck, Takeda, MSD, Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, and Janssen. PdNB has indicated consultancy for Roche, Incyte, and Novartis. SS has received grants from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys and has indicated consultancy for for Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys; he has received drug/equipment supplied by entity from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Morphosys. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Background: Randomized trials of venetoclax plus anti-CD20 antibodies as first-line treatment in fit patients (i.e., those with a low burden of coexisting conditions) with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been lacking., Methods: In a phase 3, open-label trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, fit patients with CLL who did not have TP53 aberrations to receive six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab or bendamustine-rituximab) or 12 cycles of venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. Ibrutinib was discontinued after two consecutive measurements of undetectable minimal residual disease or could be extended. The primary end points were undetectable minimal residual disease (sensitivity, <10 -4 [i.e., <1 CLL cell in 10,000 leukocytes]) as assessed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood at month 15 and progression-free survival., Results: A total of 926 patients were assigned to one of the four treatment regimens (229 to chemoimmunotherapy, 237 to venetoclax-rituximab, 229 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab, and 231 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib). At month 15, the percentage of patients with undetectable minimal residual disease was significantly higher in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group (86.5%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 80.6 to 91.1) and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (92.2%; 97.5% CI, 87.3 to 95.7) than in the chemoimmunotherapy group (52.0%; 97.5% CI, 44.4 to 59.5; P<0.001 for both comparisons), but it was not significantly higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group (57.0%; 97.5% CI, 49.5 to 64.2; P = 0.32). Three-year progression-free survival was 90.5% in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group and 75.5% in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.32; 97.5% CI, 0.19 to 0.54; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 3 years was also higher with venetoclax-obinutuzumab (87.7%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 97.5% CI, 0.26 to 0.68; P<0.001), but not with venetoclax-rituximab (80.8%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% CI, 0.53 to 1.18; P = 0.18). Grade 3 and grade 4 infections were more common with chemoimmunotherapy (18.5%) and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib (21.2%) than with venetoclax-rituximab (10.5%) or venetoclax-obinutuzumab (13.2%)., Conclusions: Venetoclax-obinutuzumab with or without ibrutinib was superior to chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment in fit patients with CLL. (Funded by AbbVie and others; GAIA-CLL13 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02950051; EudraCT number, 2015-004936-36.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Treatment concepts in oncology are becoming increasingly personalized and diverse. Successively, changes in standards of care mandate continuous monitoring of patient pathways and clinical outcomes based on large, representative real-world data. The German Cancer Consortium's (DKTK) Clinical Communication Platform (CCP) provides such opportunity. Connecting fourteen university hospital-based cancer centers, the CCP relies on a federated IT-infrastructure sourcing data from facility-based cancer registry units and biobanks. Federated analyses resulted in a cohort of 600,915 patients, out of which 232,991 were incident since 2013 and for which a comprehensive documentation is available. Next to demographic data (i.e., age at diagnosis: 2.0% 0-20 years, 8.3% 21-40 years, 30.9% 41-60 years, 50.1% 61-80 years, 8.8% 81+ years; and gender: 45.2% female, 54.7% male, 0.1% other) and diagnoses (five most frequent tumor origins: 22,523 prostate, 18,409 breast, 15,575 lung, 13,964 skin/malignant melanoma, 9005 brain), the cohort dataset contains information about therapeutic interventions and response assessments and is connected to 287,883 liquid and tissue biosamples. Focusing on diagnoses and therapy-sequences, showcase analyses of diagnosis-specific sub-cohorts (pancreas, larynx, kidney, thyroid gland) demonstrate the analytical opportunities offered by the cohort's data. Due to its data granularity and size, the cohort is a potential catalyst for translational cancer research. It provides rapid access to comprehensive patient groups and may improve the understanding of the clinical course of various (even rare) malignancies. Therefore, the cohort may serve as a decisions-making tool for clinical trial design and contributes to the evaluation of scientific findings under real-world conditions., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Data on long-term outcomes and biological drivers associated with depth of remission after BCL2 inhibition by venetoclax in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are limited. In this open-label parallel-group phase-3 study, 432 patients with previously untreated CLL were randomized (1:1) to receive either 1-year venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi, 216 patients) or chlorambucil-Obi (Clb-Obi, 216 patients) therapy (NCT02242942). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included minimal residual disease (MRD) and overall survival. RNA sequencing of CD19-enriched blood was conducted for exploratory post-hoc analyses. After a median follow-up of 65.4 months, PFS is significantly superior for Ven-Obi compared to Clb-Obi (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.26-0.46], p < 0.0001). At 5 years after randomization, the estimated PFS rate is 62.6% after Ven-Obi and 27.0% after Clb-Obi. In both arms, MRD status at the end of therapy is associated with longer PFS. MRD + ( ≥ 10 -4 ) status is associated with increased expression of multi-drug resistance gene ABCB1 (MDR1), whereas MRD6 (< 10 -6 ) is associated with BCL2L11 (BIM) expression. Inflammatory response pathways are enriched in MRD+ patient solely in the Ven-Obi arm. These data indicate sustained long-term efficacy of fixed-duration Ven-Obi in patients with previously untreated CLL. The distinct transcriptomic profile of MRD+ status suggests possible biological vulnerabilities., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Upregulation of the proto-oncogene T-cell leukemia/lymphoma 1A (TCL1A) is causally implicated in various B-cell and T-cell malignancies. High-level TCL1A correlates with aggressive disease features and inferior clinical outcomes. However, the molecular and cell biological consequences of, particularly nuclear, TCL1A are not fully elucidated. We observed here in mouse models of subcellular site-specific TCL1A-induced lymphomagenesis that TCL1A exerts a strong transforming impact via nuclear topography. In proteomic screens of TCL1A-bound molecules in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells and B-cell lymphoma lines, we identified regulators of cell cycle and DNA repair pathways as novel TCL1A interactors, particularly enriched under induced DNA damage and mitosis. By functional mapping and in silico modeling, we specifically identified the mitotic checkpoint protein, cell division cycle 20 (CDC20), as a direct TCL1A interactor. According to the regulatory impact of TCL1A on the activity of the CDC20-containing mitotic checkpoint and anaphase-promoting complexes during mitotic progression, TCL1A overexpression accelerated cell cycle transition in B-cell lymphoma lines, impaired apoptotic damage responses in association with pronounced chromosome missegregation, and caused cellular aneuploidy in Eμ-TCL1A mice. Among hematopoietic cancers, CDC20 levels seem particularly low in CLL. CDC20 expression negatively correlated with TCL1A and lower expression marked more aggressive and genomically instable disease and cellular phenotypes. Knockdown of Cdc20 in TCL1A-initiated murine CLL promoted aneuploidy and leukemic acceleration. Taken together, we discovered a novel cell cycle-associated effect of TCL1A abrogating controlled cell cycle transition. This adds to our concept of oncogenic TCL1A by targeting genome stability. Overall, we propose that TCL1A acts as a pleiotropic adapter molecule with a synergistic net effect of multiple hijacked pathways., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Transformation to aggressive disease histologies generates formidable clinical challenges across cancers, but biological insights remain few. We modeled the genetic heterogeneity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) through multiplexed in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 B-cell editing of recurrent CLL loss-of-function drivers in mice and recapitulated the process of transformation from indolent CLL into large cell lymphoma [i.e., Richter syndrome (RS)]. Evolutionary trajectories of 64 mice carrying diverse combinatorial gene assortments revealed coselection of mutations in Trp53, Mga, and Chd2 and the dual impact of clonal Mga/Chd2 mutations on E2F/MYC and interferon signaling dysregulation. Comparative human and murine RS analyses demonstrated tonic PI3K signaling as a key feature of transformed disease, with constitutive activation of the AKT and S6 kinases, downmodulation of the PTEN phosphatase, and convergent activation of MYC/PI3K transcriptional programs underlying enhanced sensitivity to MYC/mTOR/PI3K inhibition. This robust experimental system presents a unique framework to study lymphoid biology and therapy., Significance: Mouse models reflective of the genetic complexity and heterogeneity of human tumors remain few, including those able to recapitulate transformation to aggressive disease histologies. Herein, we model CLL transformation into RS through multiplexed in vivo gene editing, providing key insight into the pathophysiology and therapeutic vulnerabilities of transformed disease. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 101., (© 2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a common and incurable B-cell malignancy. Recent therapeutic approaches that target the B-cell receptor signaling pathway include inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K). The PI3K isoform delta is constitutively active in CLL, making it an attractive therapeutic target. However, the expression of PI3K isoforms is not exclusive to leukemic cells, as other immune cells in the tumor microenvironment also rely on PI3K activity. Subsequently, therapeutic inhibition of PI3K causes immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we analyzed the impact of the clinically approved PI3Kδ inhibitors idelalisib and umbralisib, the PI3Kγ inhibitor eganelisib, and the dual-γ and -δ inhibitor duvelisib on the functional capacity of T cells. All investigated inhibitors reduced T-cell activation and proliferation in vitro , which is in line with PI3K being a crucial signaling component of the T-cell receptor signaling. Further, dual inhibition of PI3Kγ and PI3Kδ showed strong additive effects suggesting a role also for PI3Kγ in T cells. Extrapolation of this data to a clinical setting could provide an explanation for the observed irAEs in CLL patients undergoing treatment with PI3K inhibitors. Consequently, this highlights the need for a close monitoring of patients treated with PI3K inhibitors, and particularly duvelisib, due to their potentially increased risk of T-cell deficiencies and associated infections., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Richter syndrome (RS) is the transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) into aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We characterize 58 primary human RS samples by genome-wide DNA methylation and whole-transcriptome profiling. Our comprehensive approach determines RS DNA methylation profile and unravels a CLL epigenetic imprint, allowing CLL-RS clonal relationship assessment without the need of the initial CLL tumor DNA. DNA methylation- and transcriptomic-based classifiers were developed, and testing on landmark DLBCL datasets identifies a poor-prognosis, activated B-cell-like DLBCL subset in 111/1772 samples. The classification robustly identifies phenotypes very similar to RS with a specific genomic profile, accounting for 4.3-8.3% of de novo DLBCLs. In this work, RS multi-omics characterization determines oncogenic mechanisms, establishes a surrogate marker for CLL-RS clonal relationship, and provides a clinically relevant classifier for a subset of primary "RS-type DLBCL" with unfavorable prognosis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Richter syndrome (RS) arising from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) exemplifies an aggressive malignancy that develops from an indolent neoplasm. To decipher the genetics underlying this transformation, we computationally deconvoluted admixtures of CLL and RS cells from 52 patients with RS, evaluating paired CLL-RS whole-exome sequencing data. We discovered RS-specific somatic driver mutations (including IRF2BP2, SRSF1, B2M, DNMT3A and CCND3), recurrent copy-number alterations beyond del(9p21)(CDKN2A/B), whole-genome duplication and chromothripsis, which were confirmed in 45 independent RS cases and in an external set of RS whole genomes. Through unsupervised clustering, clonally related RS was largely distinct from diffuse large B cell lymphoma. We distinguished pathways that were dysregulated in RS versus CLL, and detected clonal evolution of transformation at single-cell resolution, identifying intermediate cell states. Our study defines distinct molecular subtypes of RS and highlights cell-free DNA analysis as a potential tool for early diagnosis and monitoring., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

WNT pathways play an important role in cancer development and progression, but WNT pathways can also inhibit growth in melanoma, prostate, and ovarian cancers. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is known for its overexpression of several WNT ligands and receptors. Canonical WNT signaling is β-catenin-dependent, whereas non-canonical WNT signaling is β-catenin-independent. Research on WNT in CLL focuses mainly on non-canonical signaling due to the high expression of the WNT-5a receptor ROR1. However, it was also shown that mutations in canonical WNT pathway genes can lead to WNT activation in CLL. The focus of this review is β-catenin-independent signaling and β-catenin-dependent signaling within CLL cells and the role of WNT in the leukemic microenvironment. The major role of WNT pathways in CLL pathogenesis also makes WNT a possible therapeutic target, directly or in combination with other drugs.