Search

Background: Interleukin profiles can be used as biochemical markers regarding the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer., Aims: To assess CRP, CA 19-9, CEA levels, and interleukin-6, -10, and -17 profiles in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis was compared with a control group, and the correlation with pancreatic cancer survival., Methods: A total of 87 patients were prospective divided in pancreatic cancer (n = 53), chronic pancreatitis (n = 22) ,and control group (n = 12). The diagnosis of PDAC was made histologically. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was based on medical history, imaging methods, and endoscopic ultrasound. Systemic concentrations of interleukins were measured using ELISA kits. The patients were followed at 1, 3, and 6 months., Results: CRP, CA 19-9, and CEA were higher in the pancreatic cancer group (p < 0.001). Interleukin-10 was significantly higher in the pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis groups (p < 0.001). Interleukin-17 was statistically higher in the pancreatic cancer group (p < 0.0001). The cut-off of interleukin-17 of 0.273 had a sensitivity of 90.9 and a specificity of 80.9 with a curve under ROC of 0.80 in order to differentiate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The serum levels of interleukins are not correlated with the stage of the disease. CRP, CA 19-9, CEA, and interleukin-6, -10, and -17 were lower in patients with survival more than 6 months., Conclusions: We detected high levels of interleukin-6, -10, and -17 in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Serum interleukin-17 levels can discriminate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The prognostic role of interleukins needs to be established., (© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Barrett's Esophagus (BE) is defined as a premalignant condition, where the esophageal squamous epithelium is replaced by intestinal epithelium. Specialized intestinal columnar metaplasia, typical for Barrett's esophagus, does not generate any symptoms. Most of the patients are initially seen for symptoms associated with the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), such as heartburn, regurgitation and dysphagia. The histological progression from intestinal metaplasia to dysplasia and then to BE-associated adenocarcinoma forms the argument for screening and endoscopic monitoring. The examination of Barrett's esophagus is controversial. Certain groups suggest a screening of the patients who exhibit more risk factors for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (for instance, gastroesophageal reflux disease, age 50, male, high body mass index with abdominal fat distribution). The main reason behind the treatment of acid reflux is that it may lead to chronic esophageal inflammation, which in its turn may predispose to the development of cancer., (Celsius.)

Background: Optimal bowel preparation is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of colonoscopy. Several patient-related factors are known to influence the quality of bowel cleansing but randomized trials in this area are lacking. We aimed to compare an individualized bowel prep strategy based on patient characteristics to a standard preparation regimen., Material and Methods: We conducted an endoscopist-blinded multicenter randomized control-trial. The Boston Bowel Prep Score (BBPS) was used to assess quality of bowel preparation and a 10 point visual analogue scale to assess patient comfort during bowel prep. Patients were randomised to either the standard regimens of split-dose 4L polyethylene-glycol (group A), split-dose sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (group B) or to either of the two depending on their responses to a 3-item questionnaire (individualized preparation, group C)., Results: 185 patients were randomized during the study period and 143 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients in the individualized group had a median BBPS of 7 compared to a median of 6 in the standard group (p = 0.7). Also, there was no significant difference in patients' comfort scores, irrespective of study group or laxative regimen. However, on multivariable analysis, a split-dose 4L polyethylene-glycol was an independent predictor for achieving a BBPS>6 (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.4-9.8), regardless of patient-related factors., Conclusion: The choice of laxative seems to be more important than patient-related factors in predicting bowel cleansing. Comfort during bowel prep is not influenced by the type of strategy used.

Background: There are some studies which have reported a higher diagnosis probability for PC if the DM occurred within the past 2-3 years. Information on the clinical profile of pancreatic cancer (PC) associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) is limited. The aim of the study was to compare clinic-morphological features in patients with new onset DM and PC and long lasting DM and PC, in order to detect new factors or markers which can help in early diagnosis of PC., Methods: This study included 76 patients with pancreatic cancer admitted between 2000-2009 in the 4th Medical Clinic Cluj-Napoca; in group A 56 patients with PC and new onset of DM (< 24 months duration) were included and in group B 20 patients with PC and long standing diabetes (> 60 months duration) were included. We compared the demographic, clinical, biochemical and morphological characteristics of new onset or long lasting DM and pancreatic cancer., Results: New onset DM was more prevalent (74% vs. 26%, p < .05) than long lasting DM among patients with PC. The patients with long lasting DM had a greater frequency of urban environment (100% vs. 55.6% p = .02), a higher body mass index (BMI)(32.1 SD 8.4 vs. 29.9 SD 6.7 kg/m2, p = .05), higher fasting blood glucose levels (182 mg/dL vs. 134 mg/dL, p = .008) and urinary ketone bodies (60% vs. 10.7%, p = .002) compared with those with new-onset DM and PC. There was no statistical difference regarding gender, median age, blood group, location and staging of tumours, long and hard alcohol and cigarettes consumption, between group A and B., Conclusions: New onset DM was more significantly frequent than long lasting DM in patients with PC. New onset diabetes DM associated with PC is frequent, mild and non-decompensated. In patients with PC and long lasting DM, the metabolic status and diabetes are imbalanced.

Aims: Colonoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer-related mortality and incidence. However, many patients are reluctant to undergo colonoscopy or return for follow-up because of the investigation's cumbersome and unpleasant nature. We aimed to identify patient-related factors significantly influencing comfort and quality of colonoscopy analyzing responses to a self-administered validated questionnaire., Methods: Patients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation in two high-volume endoscopy units were invited to answer a short prevalidated questionnaire regarding preprocedure anxiety, satisfaction with information provided, most worrisome aspect of the procedure and knowledge of the benefits of colonoscopy. Self-reported comfort during colonoscopy as graded on a 10 point visual analog scale was the main variable considered. Univariate analysis identified factors possibly associated with a higher degree of comfort during colonoscopy that were then tested through multivariate logistical regression., Results: 452 questionnaires were returned. Most patients reported an acceptable degree of discomfort during colonoscopy but 70.2% of the respondents considered the information provided prior to the procedure to be insufficient. On multivariate analysis older age, higher degree of satisfaction with information provided (p = 0.04), lower preprocedure anxiety levels (p < 0.01) and endoscopy center (p < 0.01) were shown to correlate with increased comfort during colonoscopy. Education level, previous colonoscopy, gender and bowel prep quality did not influence patient comfort., Conclusions: Patient comfort during colonoscopy is dependent on satisfaction with the information provided before the procedure. Higher availability of the physician and better interaction with the patient might decrease patient perceived burden of colonoscopy and lead to higher return rates in the screening and surveillance setting.

Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma accounts for 13-18% of all malignant tumours of small bowel and only 1 % of large bowel tumours (1). Multiple lymphomatous polyposis is a rare entity, characterized by the presence of multiple lymphomatous polyps along the gut (2). Majority of cases with gastrointestinal primary lymphoma are classified histologically as "mantle cell" lymphomas. A 59 year old patient was admitted to our clinic for fatigue and rectal bleeding. Endoscopic examination of the colon revealed an infiltrative-exulcerative lesion of the terminal ileon, a polypoid mass on ileocecal valve and multiple polyps over the entire colon and rectum. Gastroscopy revealed polyps into the duodenal bulb. Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies on biopsy specimens from colon and duodenum confirmed gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, probably "mantle cell" lymphoma. Because she was in an advanced stage she received only cytostatic treatment. A clinical, endoscopical and histopathological follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months was performed.