Search

Art in neurosurgery has been a critical part of the discipline for centuries. Numerous cultures, such as ancient India, China, and Egypt, and more contemporary scientists, such as Leonardo da Vinci, Max Brödel, and Norman Dott, have significantly contributed to medical illustration. Today, advancements in three-dimensional technology have allowed for the creation of detailed neuroanatomy models for surgical planning and education. Medical illustrations are also used for research and outcome documentation as they help visualize anatomy and surgical procedures. Its use in education, surgical planning, and navigation remains integral to the advancement of neurosurgery. This review demonstrates the invaluable contribution of art in neurosurgery and how it has enabled continuous progress in the field., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patient feedback surveys provide important insight into patient outcomes, satisfaction, and perioperative needs. Recent critiques have questioned provider-initiated surveys and their capacity to accurately gauge patient perspectives due to intrinsic biases created by question framing. In this study, the authors sought to evaluate provider-independent, patient-controlled social media Instagram posts in order to better understand the patient experience following scoliosis correction surgery., Methods: Twitter and Instagram were queried for posts with two tagged indicators, #scoliosissurgery or @scoliosissurgery, resulting in no relevant Twitter posts and 25,000 Instagram posts. Of the initial search, 24,500 Instagram posts that did not directly involve the patient's own experience were eliminated. Posts were analyzed and coded for the following criteria: the gender of the patient, preoperative or postoperative timing discussed in the post, and classified themes related to the patient's experiences with scoliosis correction surgery., Results: Females made 87.6% of the Instagram posts about their experience following scoliosis correction surgery. The initial postoperative stage of surgery was mentioned in 7.6% of Instagram posts. The most common theme on Instagram involved offering or seeking online support from other patients, which constituted 85.2% of all posts. Other common themes included concern about the surgical scar (31.8%), discussing the results of treatment (28.8%), and relief regarding results (21.2%)., Conclusions: Social media provided a platform to analyze unprompted feedback from patients. Patients were most concerned with their scoliosis correction surgery in the period of time 2 weeks or more after surgery. Themes that were most commonly found on Instagram posts were offering or seeking online support from other patients and concern about the surgical scar. Patient-controlled social media platforms, like Instagram, may provide a useful mechanism for healthcare providers to understand the patient experience following scoliosis correction surgery. Such platforms may help in evaluating postoperative satisfaction and improving postoperative quality of care.

Background: With an aging population, elderly patients with multiple comorbidities are more frequently undergoing spine surgery and may be at increased risk for complications. Objective measurement of frailty may predict the incidence of postoperative adverse events., Objective: To investigate the associations between preoperative frailty and postoperative spine surgery outcomes including mortality, length of stay, readmission, surgical site infection, and venous thromboembolic disease., Methods: As part of a system-wide quality improvement initiative, frailty assessment was added to the routine assessment of patients considering spine surgery beginning in July 2016. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and patients were categorized as nonfrail (RAI 0-29) or prefrail/frail (RAI ≥ 30). Comparisons between nonfrail and prefrail/frail patients were analyzed using Fisher's exact test for categorical data or by Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous data., Results: From August 2016 through September 2018, 668 patients (age of 59.5 ± 13.3 yr) had a preoperative RAI score recorded and underwent scheduled spine surgery. Prefrail and frail patients suffered comparatively higher rates of mortality at 90 d (1.9% vs 0.2%, P < .05) and 1 yr (5.1% vs 1.2%, P < .01) from the procedure date. They also had longer in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (3.9 d ± 3.6 vs 3.1 d ± 2.8, P < .001) and higher rates of 60 d (14.6% vs 8.2%, P < .05) and 90 d (15.8% vs 9.8%, P < .05) readmissions., Conclusion: Preoperative frailty, as measured by the RAI, was associated with an increased risk of readmission and 90-d and 1-yr mortality following spine surgery. The RAI can be used to stratify spine patients and inform preoperative surgical decision making., (Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Objective: There is an increasing trend among patients and their families to seek medical knowledge on the internet. Patients undergoing surgical interventions, including lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), often rely on online videos as a first source of knowledge to familiarize themselves with the procedure. In this study the authors sought to investigate the reliability and quality of LLIF-related online videos., Methods: In December 2018, the authors searched the YouTube platform using 3 search terms: lateral lumbar interbody fusion, LLIF surgery, and LLIF. The relevance-based ranking search option was used, and results from the first 3 pages were investigated. Only videos from universities, hospitals, and academic associations were included for final evaluation. By means of the DISCERN instrument, a validated measure of reliability and quality for online patient education resources, 3 authors of the present study independently evaluated the quality of information., Results: In total, 296 videos were identified by using the 3 search terms. Ten videos met inclusion criteria and were further evaluated. The average (± SD) DISCERN video quality assessment score for these 10 videos was 3.42 ± 0.16. Two videos (20%) had an average score above 4, corresponding to a high-quality source of information. Of the remaining 8 videos, 6 (60%) scored moderately, in the range of 3-4, indicating that the publication is reliable but important information is missing. The final 2 videos (20%) had a low average score (2 or below), indicating that they are unlikely to be of any benefit and should not be used. Videos with intraoperative clips were significantly more popular, as indicated by the numbers of likes and views (p = 0.01). There was no correlation between video popularity and DISCERN score (p = 0.104). In August 2019, the total number of views for the 10 videos in the final analysis was 537,785., Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that patients who seek to access information about LLIF by using the YouTube platform will be presented with an overall moderate quality of educational content on this procedure. Moreover, compared with videos that provide patient information on treatments used in other medical fields, videos providing information on LLIF surgery are still exiguous. In view of the increasing trend to seek medical knowledge on the YouTube platform, and in order to support and optimize patient education on LLIF surgery, the authors encourage academic neurosurgery institutions in the United States and worldwide to implement the release of reliable video educational content.

Background: Improving the comprehension and communication of patient education materials could augment patient participation in shared clinical decision making. Inadequate healthcare-oriented educational resources for patients with a newly diagnosed complex disease, such as a cerebral aneurysm, can lead to an insufficient understanding of their ailment. As such, we hypothesized that a PowerPoint-style educational intervention with grade-conscious (i.e., sixth grade level) written material accompanied by visual graphics would help improve patient health literacy and satisfaction., Methods: A randomized prospective pilot study was conducted during a 1-year period in 2018. Preclinic encounter knowledge assessment surveys were administered to 52 patients with brain aneurysms (newly diagnosed or during follow-up) presenting for their neurosurgery outpatient clinic visit. The patients were assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts, with 26 each in the educational intervention group and control group, using a quasi-randomization method of alternating the assigned group for each successive patient. At the conclusion of their clinic encounter, all the patients completed a postclinic encounter knowledge assessment and satisfaction survey. Differences in covariates such as gender distribution, age, and family history of aneurysms were analyzed between the control and intervention groups., Results: The overall study cohort had a high baseline knowledge about cerebral aneurysms with an average preclinic encounter score of 5.37 on the 7-question survey. The educational intervention resulted in an upward trend in the patient knowledge scores. No statistically significant difference was detected in the patient satisfaction scores between the intervention and control groups. However, most of the patients receiving the educational intervention reported that the educational material was easy to understand (95.7%), helpful (86.9%), and relevant (87%) to their clinic visit., Conclusion: Overall, in the present prospective study, the use of a multimedia-based educational intervention resulted in an upward trend in knowledge without a statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction scores compared with the control patients. To better measure the effectiveness of multimedia-based patient education interventions, future studies should account for the patients' baseline education level, preexisting educational resources available to study patients, socioeconomic factors, and emotional state., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The political action committee (PAC) of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, known as NeurosurgeryPAC, was formed in August 2005 to strengthen neurosurgical advocacy efforts. Since its establishment, NeurosurgeryPAC has made nonpartisan, direct campaign contributions to hundreds of candidates for the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives., Methods: Historical contribution data for 2005-2018 was obtained from NeurosurgeryPAC. Data analyzed by year, and a 2-year election cycle included total amount raised, number of contributors, average donation, and percent participation. NeurosurgeryPAC contribution amounts for election cycles were also compared with those of other physician PACs., Results: NeurosurgeryPAC has raised $2,953,870 since its inception in 2005, for an average of $210,991 per year. For this fundraising, the average annual donation amount is $796 per donor. The number of unique contributors per cycle has varied from 316-504, with an average of 389 individuals per annum and a participation rate of 7.8%. To date, the total amount raised in election years ($1,605,940) is 16.1% higher than that raised in nonelection years ($1,347,930). Among 28 physician PACs, NeurosurgeryPAC has ranked as high as 13 and as low as 17 in total hard money contributions. The orthopedic, neurology and general surgery PACs have consistently ranked higher than NeurosurgeryPAC, whereas the otolaryngology, spine, and plastic surgery PACs have ranked lower., Conclusions: Since its creation, NeurosurgeryPAC has collected a steady stream of donations to support political candidates. These donations have helped lawmakers who are supportive of policy issues important to neurosurgery, particularly physician reimbursement, medical liability reform, and graduate medical education. However, there remains a significant opportunity to increase the neurosurgeon participation rate in this vital organization. It is truly through advocacy that we will be able to positively affect the future of neurologic surgery in the United States., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The infliction of a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) propagates damage that occurs in 2 stages. The first phase of trauma develops from the initial mechanical insult. The second phase involves the degradation of nervous tissue but is likely not affected by the initial insult. Thus, therapeutic targets with a high specificity for these secondary injury processes have been of increasing interest. We reviewed the pathophysiologic cascades of inflammation after SCI and potential therapeutic targets., Methods: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried using appropriate medical subject headings for studies involving tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α), nuclear factor (NF)-κB, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), interleukin (IL)-1β, and/or Fas ligand (FasL) targets. The relevant studies found were graded into 3 levels (i.e., A, B, C) according to the quality of evidence., Results: We have summarized the basis of the neurological damage for TNF-α, NF-κB, iNOS, IL-1β, and FasL after SCI. A total of 17 studies were rated, each of which had reported histological, biochemical, physiological, and behavioral outcomes according to the treatment that had focused on TNF-α, NF-κB, iNOS, IL-1β, and FasL., Conclusion: The TNF-α, iNOS, NF-κB, IL-1β, and FasL will become active within minutes after SCI. The adverse effects from the activity of these receptors include inflammation and other important neurological damage. Each of these targets can be modulated by specific agents with differing degrees of efficacy according to the reported data., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)