Search

Objectives: We aimed to assess the frequency, management, and burden of enterococcal-related vascular graft infection., Patients and Methods: From 2008 to 2021, data regarding all episodes of vascular graft infections initially managed or secondarily referred to our referral center were prospectively collected. We described the history and management of the infection, depending on the type of prosthesis used., Results: The frequency of enterococcal-related vascular graft infections was 29/249 (12 %). Most of them were early infections (22/29, 76 %). Infections were polymicrobial (26/29, 90 %), mostly associated with Enterobacterales. Among patients with positive blood cultures, 7/8 (88 %) involved enterococci. Patients with enterococcal-related vascular graft infections were mainly (22/29, 76 %) treated with an association of antibiotics. Mortality and relapse occurred in 28 % and 7 % respectively of the cases., Conclusions: Enterococcal-related vascular graft infections occurred in patients with comorbidities, during the early period following surgery and were more frequent in cases of intra-cavitary prosthesis. Their potential virulence needs to be considered, especially in polymicrobial infections., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Polypharmacy can lead to drug-drug interactions (DDIs), especially with ART. The burden of co-medications, including over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and self-medications, could be underestimated. We aimed to investigate the proportion of people living with HIV (PLHIV) with declared and undeclared co-medications, as well as their potential burden., Methods: We conducted a national, multicentre, 1 week cross-sectional study between 10 December and 16 December 2019 in 23 French hospitals amongst consecutive adult PLHIV presenting for a routine outpatient visit. A standardized questionnaire filled in by the physicians assessed all medications and other active chemical substances taken by the PLHIV., Results: Overall we enrolled 496 participants from 23 centres. Median age was 50.6 years; ART regimens included an integrase inhibitor in 61% (n = 302), an NNRTI in 34% (n = 169) and a PI in 14% (n = 70) of the cases. Co-medications involved 392 (79%) PLHIV, among which 85 (17%) received polypharmacy (≥5 medications). Previously unknown co-medications or other active substances were found for 32% (n = 159) of the participants. Corticosteroids (9%, n = 46) and proton pump inhibitors (10%, n = 50) were frequently administered. These co-medications did not differ according to age range. Illegal drug use was declared by 11% (n = 54) and OTC drugs by 23% (n = 113) of PLHIV. Potential DDIs were discovered for 11% (n = 53), leading to treatment modifications in 47% (25/53) of cases., Conclusions: Potential DDIs that lead to therapeutic modifications remain significant whatever the age of PLHIV. More devoted time to identify co-medications and OTC treatment is needed in all PLHIV., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Since 2017, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been one of the tools in combination HIV prevention strategies. The objective of our questionnaire was to analyze the knowledge and the position of general practitioners in Hauts-de-France on PrEP., Method: This quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020 using an anonymous questionnaire sent by post to a sample of 3007 GPs., Results: Four hundred and forty-four questionnaires (14.8 %) were included. The GPs were predominantly male (n = 253, 57 %) with a median age of 47 years. The median interest shown by respondents was 7/10. One hundred and sixty participating GPs (36%) were aware of the principles of PrEP, one hundred and sixty were only aware of the title (36%) and 124 (28%) showed no awareness at all. Out of the 160 GPs who knew about PrEP, 72 % considered it effective, 30 % knew about it from a patient and 34 % declared having at least one patient using PrEP. GPs who knew about PrEP were more likely to: have graduated less than 10 years before, having seen in consultation men who have sex with men (MSMs) and, lastly; using screening practices for sexually transmitted infections that were better aligned with the recommendations than those who reported not knowing about PrEP., Conclusion: Although PrEP remains insufficiently known to GPs, many expressed eagerness to be involved. The training of health professionals and the highlighting of GPs' role in prevention could help to optimize the fight against HIV., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Staphylococci account for approximately 60% of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Rifampicin (RMP) combination therapy is generally considered to be the treatment of choice for staphylococcal PJIs but carries an important risk of adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin (RFB) shares many of the properties of rifampicin but causes fewer adverse events., Objectives: To compare the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC), and the minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC) of rifabutin and rifampicin for staphylococcal clinical strains isolated from PJIs., Methods: 132 clinical strains of rifampicin-susceptible staphylococci [51 Staphylococcus aureus (SA), 48 Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) and 33 other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS)] were studied. The MBC and the MBEC were determined using the MBEC® Assay for rifabutin and rifampicin and were compared., Results: When compared with the rifampicin MIC median value, the rifabutin MIC median value was significantly higher for SA (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference for SE (P = 0.25) and CoNS (P = 0.29). The rifabutin MBC median value was significantly higher than that of rifampicin for SA (P = 0.003) and was lower for SE (P = 0.003) and CoNS (P = 0.03). Rifabutin MBEC median value was statistically lower than that of rifampicin for all strains tested., Conclusions: Using the determination of MBEC values, our study suggests that rifabutin is more effective than rifampicin against clinical strains of Staphylococcus spp. obtained from PJIs. Using MBECs instead of MICs seems to be of interest when considering biofilms. In vivo higher efficacy of rifabutin when compared with rifampicin needs to be confirmed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Disseminated Mycobacterium marinum infections occur rarely, in immunocompromised patients. Treatment with a prolonged multi-drug regimen exposes patients to drug-drug interactions and side effects., Case Report: We report a case of disseminated M. marinum infection in a 54-year-old renal transplant, HIV-infected woman. Manifestations of the infection were cutaneous and subcutaneous nodules, mediastinal lymph nodes and left pulmonary infiltrate. Empirical treatment for non-tuberculous mycobacteria was initiated with rifabutin, ethambutol and azithromycin. After identifying M. marinum in sputum, due to unfavourable clinical evolution and severe drug-related adverse events, treatment was changed to doxycycline and rifabutin. Digestive and haematologic side effects motivated a change in antimycobacterial treatment to a combination of moxifloxacin and bedaquiline. Tolerance was satisfactory, and the patient was cured after 12 months of treatment., Conclusion: We report (to the authors' knowledge) the first case of disseminated M. marinum infection successfully treated with a bedaquiline-containing regimen. Bedaquiline could be an alternative to recommended antimicrobial regimens in cases of non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease, including M. marinum infection., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an innovative technique to explore hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. We aimed to assess its diagnostic accuracy in HIV-infected patients in a tuberculosis low-burden area. A retrospective review was performed of all HIV-infected patients with thoracic lymphadenopathy referred for EBUS-TBNA between January 2012 and January 2019 in 3 Northern French Hospitals. A total of 15 patients was included during the study period. Our patients were predominantly male (80%), with a mean age of 50 ± 11 years. Six patients (43%) had a CD4 cells count of less than 200/mm 3 . Eleven patients (73%) were receiving antiretroviral therapy, and 7 (47%) reached undetectable viral load. Adequate lymphnode sampling was accomplished in all patients. No serious complications were reported. EBUS-TBNA led to a definitive diagnosis in 12 out of 15 patients (80%). It identified 4 neoplasia, 3 atypical mycobacterial diseases, 2 tuberculosis, 1 Castleman disease, 1 sarcoidosis, and 1 professional dustiness. In 3 cases, sampling revealed normal lymphoid tissue. Active surveillance confirmed the suspected diagnosis of HIV adenitis with regression of lymphadenopathy on antiretroviral therapy in 2 cases. In one case of negative sampling, thoracoscopy led to the diagnosis of tuberculosis. In our cohort, accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was 92%. EBUS-TBNA appeared to be a safe and accurate tool in the investigation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in HIV-infected patients in settings of tuberculosis low-prevalence. It can avoid more invasive procedures such as mediastinoscopy.

Issues have been raised concerning clinical relevance of HIV-1 proviral DNA genotypic resistance test (DNA GRT). To assess impact of DNA GRT on choice of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and subsequent virological outcome, we retrospectively reviewed decision-making and viral load (VL) evolution following DNA GRT performed in our center between January 2012 and December 2017, except those prescribed within the framework of a clinical trial. A total of 304 DNA GRTs were included, 185 (62%) performed in a context of virological success. Only 34% of tests were followed by ART change, more frequently in situation of virological success (39% vs. 26%, p  = 0.02). In this situation, ART change guided by DNA GRT led to VL >20 copies/mL after 6 months in 5% of cases. In multivariate analysis, higher HIV DNA quantification ( p  = 0.01) was associated with occurrence of viremia. A higher nadir of CD4 count ( p  = 0.04) and a longer time with VL <20 copies/mL ( p  = 0.04) were independently associated with a lower risk of viremia. In situation of low-level viremia, ART change guided by DNA GRT led to VL <20 copies/mL after 6 months in 52% of cases, while decision to maintain the same treatment led to VL <20 copies/mL in 74% of cases. In multivariate analysis, longer time with VL >20 copies/mL ( p  = 0.02) was associated with persistence of virological replication. In conclusion, in situation of virological success, use of DNA GRT in addition to analysis of historical RNA GRT to guide ART optimization appears safe. Its prescription framework in situation of low-level viremia deserves to be better defined.

Background: The prevalence of Achromobacter xylosoxidans lung isolation in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients has increased, but the impact on lung function is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of A. xylosoxidans isolation on respiratory function of adult patients with CF in the first 3 years after identification of A. xylosoxidans isolation., Methods: This was a case-control retrospective study performed at a single CF centre in Lille, France. Data for 36 patients with CF who had at least one sputum culture positive for A. xylosoxidans ( Ax+ ) were evaluated and compared with control CF patients uninfected by A. xylosoxidans ( Ax- ). Respiratory function and exacerbation frequency were evaluated between 1 year prior to and 3 years after A. xylosoxidans isolation., Results: Compared with the Ax - group, the Ax+ group had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) at baseline (median (interquartile range): 55.2% (50.6-59.8%) versus 73.8% (67.2-80.4%); p=0.005), a greater decline in FEV 1 (±se) in the first year after A. xylosoxidans identification (-153.6±16.1 mL·year -1 versus -63.8±18.5 mL·year -1 ; p=0.0003), and more exacerbations in the first 3 years after A. xylosoxidans identification (9 (7-12) versus 7 (5-10); p=0.03). Ax+ patients co-colonised with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=27, 75%) had a greater FEV 1 decline (p=0.003) and more exacerbations in the year after A. xylosoxidans identification (p=0.037) compared with patients colonised with A. xylosoxidans alone. Patients with chronic A. xylosoxidans isolation (n=23, 64%) had more exacerbations than intermittently colonised patients in the 3 years after A. xylosoxidans identification (p=0.012)., Conclusion: A. xylosoxidans isolation is associated with a decline in respiratory function in patients with CF. Chronic A. xylosoxidans isolation and P. aeruginosa co-isolation may be markers of more severe respiratory disease in Ax + patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Tetart has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Wallet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Kyheng has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Leroy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Perez reports being the principal investigator of a clinical study evaluating a device for chest clearance in cystic fibrosis (Simeox, PhysioAssist). Conflict of interest: O. Le Rouzic reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Lilly and Novartis, and nonfinancial support from GlaxoSmithKline, MundiPharma, Pfizer, Teva, the Santelys Association, Vertex and Vitalaire, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Wallaert reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Prevotat reports personal fees from Vertex and GSK, and congress invitations from Teva and Novartis, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

Competing Interests: S. Alfandari déclare participer ou avoir participé à des interventions ponctuelles pour l’entreprise Gilead (action de formation), MSD (action de formation, conseil), Novartis (action de formation), Pfizer (action de formation) ; et avoir été pris en charge (transport, hôtel, repas), à l’occasion de déplacement pour congrès, par Astellas, Gilead, MSD, Novex et Pfizer. M. Tetart n'a pas fourni de déclaration de lien d'intérêts.

Competing Interests: S. Alfandari déclare participer ou avoir participé à des interventions ponctuelles pour l’entreprise Gilead (action de formation), MSD (action de formation, conseil), Novartis (action de formation), Pfizer (action de formation) ; et avoir été pris en charge (transport, hôtel, repas), à l’occasion de déplacement pour congrès, par Astellas, Gilead, MSD, Novex et Pfizer. M. Tetart n'a pas fourni de déclaration de lien d'intérêts.