Search

This prospective, parallel-group, dose-escalation study evaluated the cardiac safety of trastuzumab (Herceptin) plus epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and determined an epirubicin dose for further evaluation. HER2-positive patients received standard-dose trastuzumab plus epirubicin (60 or 90 mg/m(2))/cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) 3-weekly (EC60+H, n=26; EC90+H, n=25), for four to six cycles; 23 HER2-negative patients received EC alone (90/600 mg/m(2)) 3-weekly for six cycles (EC90). All patients underwent thorough cardiac evaluation. Two EC90+H-treated patients experienced symptomatic congestive heart failure 4.5 and 6 months after the end of chemotherapy. One EC60+H-treated patient experienced an asymptomatic decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to <50% 6 months after the end of chemotherapy. No such events occurred in control patients. Asymptomatic LVEF decreases of >10% points were detected in 12 (48%), 14 (56%) and 5 (24%) patients treated with EC60+H, EC90+H, and EC90. Objective response rates with EC60+H and EC90+H were >60%, and 26% for EC90 alone. These results indicate that trastuzumab may be combined with EC with manageable cardiotoxicity and promising efficacy.

To enable individualized risk-oriented adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, validated parameters are needed to help evaluate the individual relapse risk. The clinical significance of these factors is assessed by published evidence (level of evidence) and its utility in the clinical setting (utility score). The traditional prognostic factors (age, TNM stage, grading, and steroid hormone receptor status are of established clinical relevance, and their determination should be obligatory. Of the "new" tumor-biologic parameters, only the measurement of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor (PAI-1) in the primary tumor of node-negative patients has been adequately validated and can therefore be recommended for clinical application. Promising recent prognostic markers are the expression of Her2/neu, detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates, various different surrogates for proliferative activity, and tumor-specific gene expression profiles. Currently, however, the data available are insufficient to allow recommendation of the parameters for routine clinical use at this time.

Objective: In 90 patients with primary node-negative breast carcinomas we compared the prognostic impact of total S-phase fraction (SPF) and MIB1 proliferation rate (MIB1-PR) after a median follow-up of 34 months (9-72 months)., Methods: SPF was determined flow cytometrically and MIB1 (Ki-67) immunohistochemically in parallel-cut, paraffin-embedded tissue sections., Results: SPF was significantly correlated to tumor size and steroid hormone receptor status, MIB1-PR to grading. In univariate analysis both SPF and MIB1-PR were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival. In multivariate analysis however, S-phase fraction was the only significant prognostic factor when compared to MIB1-PR, tumor size, steroid hormone receptor status, menopausal status, grading, lymph vessel invasion, and tumor necrosis., Conclusions: In our study SPF was of higher prognostic strength and may therefore be better suited for clinical application than MIB1-PR in node-negative breast cancer.